Andrews article getting slated by Daily Mail readers

[poppsywoppsy]

My, if he thinks he is popular, he needs to see the readers comments after his article has been reproduced.

He is hundreds down on every comment even the Gay ones.

I know DM readers get slated but on this, they are spot on for me.

[Vanessa]

That's OK, no one cares about the Daily Fail :hee:

[Jase.]

A thread about DAILY MAIL COMMENTS now?

Wow. :joker:

[poppsywoppsy]

That's OK, no one cares about the Daily Fail :hee:

Just because you don't, it does not make it the same for everybody else.

[Marches]

A thread about DAILY MAIL COMMENTS now?

Wow. :joker:

When nothing happens in the series you have to talk about something

[Amy Jade]

Daily Mail readers are generally scum of the lowest eb

[Vanessa]

A thread about DAILY MAIL COMMENTS now?

Wow. :joker:

Since when their opinion counts :hehe:

[poppsywoppsy]

A thread about DAILY MAIL COMMENTS now?

Wow. :joker:

Absolutely, they are the Great British voting public

And your point is?

[Jase.]

When nothing happens in the series you have to talk about something

True...but...the comments section of the Daily Mail site? :skull:

[poppsywoppsy]

Daily Mail readers are generally scum of the lowest eb

I do not think so because they would not use your turn of phrase for a start.

Look at the numbers, it is brilliant.

[Underscore]

Daily Fail readers are scum of the earth so this isn't exactly a testament against Andrew. It's just scum slating slightly lesser scum :joker:

[Shaun]

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve it but... have you ever read a DM article with positive comments below it?

[joeysteele]

That's OK, no one cares about the Daily Fail :hee:

I certainly don't either Vanessa.
Obviously just speaking for myself.

[poppsywoppsy]

True...but...the comments section of the Daily Mail site? :skull:

Great British public, no less

They see him for exactly like he is, this Is Andrew we are talking about, the woman smashing, thing loving house reject.

[Underscore]

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve it but... have you ever read a DM article with positive comments below it?

The right wing armchair men always love to be up in arms about something - yet they complain about 'snowflakes' being up in arms about something.

So they're up in arms about people being up in arms...

[Jack_]

screaming, if you're slated by the cretins who plague the Daily Mail comment section it means you're doing something RIGHT. God if I was ever praised by anyone with their worldview I'd be ashamed

[poppsywoppsy]

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve it but... have you ever read a DM article with positive comments below it?

Yes many a time

Mock all you like but there are hundreds on there who do not think like you.

Generalizations cannot ever make sense.

[HBIC]

He should be proud of this accomplishment.

[poppsywoppsy]

screaming, if you're slated by the cretins who plague the Daily Mail comment section it means you're doing something RIGHT. God if I was ever praised by anyone with their worldview I'd be ashamed

I don't think that it is likely, so no matter

It's when it's the Sun and Daily Star you have to worry about

[poppsywoppsy]

He should be proud of this accomplishment.

Absolutely.:laugh:

[poppsywoppsy]

Daily Fail readers are scum of the earth so this isn't exactly a testament against Andrew. It's just scum slating slightly lesser scum :joker:

Overused word scum, it loses its shock value after a while

Scum, scum, scum, fill yer boots, scum, scum

[pontyboi]

My, if he thinks he is popular, he needs to see the readers comments after his article has been reproduced.

He is hundreds down on every comment even the Gay ones.

I know DM readers get slated but on this, they are spot on for me.

99% of readers comments are all negative....just like yours on this forum.

This is a non story from people who have nothing better to do than troll forums, newspapers and sadly have a hobby on yelp disgracing restaurants and hotels lol.

Thrilling life they lead.

[Jack_]

I don't think that it is likely, so no matter

It's when it's the Sun and Daily Star you have to worry about

The Mail is from the same cesspit of disgraceful journalism that The Sun is, so that makes no sense

[pontyboi]

Just to add these posters only read the headlines and go straight to the comments to start the bashing.

[Marches]

The Mail is from the same cesspit of disgraceful journalism that The Sun is, so that makes no sense

Either of them barely constitute as journalism

[Patricia4]

Daily Mail readers are generally scum of the lowest eb

Excuse me I read the daily mail everyday and I'm old but I'm not scum.

[Kazanne]

Daily Fail readers are scum of the earth so this isn't exactly a testament against Andrew. It's just scum slating slightly lesser scum :joker:

So did this scum chose the Daily Mail to spout his venom ?

[Shaun]

Yes many a time

Mock all you like but there are hundreds on there who do not think like you.

Generalizations cannot ever make sense.

Thank god you don't get wild generalizations on there, then

[Lstan]

That's OK, no one cares about the Daily Fail :hee:

Just because you don't, it does not make it the same for everybody else.


Nah she's right no one cares :laugh:

[pontyboi]

Also poppsywoppsey have you noticed you are arguing with everyone in thos thread?

[Robodog]

Daily Mail was always bad
It was easy back then

But The Indy and The Guardian have become left wing versions of the Daily Mail now
Same kind of sensationalist sh4t stirring but from another angle
Especially in the last couple of years

But there is still hilarious comments and occasional moments of wisdom from people in the comments section of all of them - always worth raking through

You really can't judge a whole readership as being one thing!
That's just being bigoted yourself.
People everywhere can come up with good stuff once in a while.
All forums are the same - you get a mixed bag of people from all perspectives, just like this site

[poppsywoppsy]

Also poppsywoppsey have you noticed you are arguing with everyone in thos thread?

Yes, so it is a few forum writers against hundreds of DM readers

Why should I care what the few write.

I don't and cannot say how great it is that Andrew hasn't pulled the wool over so many others eyes as he seems to have done with those few.

[poppsywoppsy]

Daily Mail was always bad
It was easy back then

But The Indy and The Guardian have become left wing versions of the Daily Mail now
Same kind of sensationalist sh4t stirring but from another angle
Especially in the last couple of years

But there is still hilarious comments and occasional moments of wisdom from people in the comments section of all of them - always worth raking through

You really can't judge a whole readership as being one thing!
That's just being bigoted yourself.
People everywhere can come up with good stuff once in a while.
All forums are the same - you get a mixed bag of people from all perspectives, just like this site



It's all generalities

I don't read the DM for anything more than news articles and a few celeb infos.

I am educated to degree level and can make my own mind up.

I can also count and a few dissenters does not make a newspaper readership defunct.

[Twosugars]

My, if he thinks he is popular, he needs to see the readers comments after his article has been reproduced.

He is hundreds down on every comment even the Gay ones.

I know DM readers get slated but on this, they are spot on for me.


Well done Andrew:cheer2:
Being hated by that lot is a badge of honour:dance:

[poppsywoppsy]

Well done Andrew:cheer2:
Being hated by that lot is a badge of honour:dance:

When he calls the female members the same names in your house, and tell in detail what he would do, don't forget to give him that badge on the way out.

[T*]

this is like saying you found garbage in the bin?

[Twosugars]

My, if he thinks he is popular, he needs to see the readers comments after his article has been reproduced.

He is hundreds down on every comment even the Gay ones.

I know DM readers get slated but on this, they are spot on for me.

Do they really hate him so much...?
Poppsy, I could give you a kiss for bringing such good news.
I didn't think this night could get any better!
:kiss:

[poppsywoppsy]

Thank god you don't get wild generalizations on there, then

Ok, perhaps I got it wrong.

I will add them all up, there are thousands, you could add them up for yourself
It is all out there.

Enjoy

[poppsywoppsy]

Do they really hate him so much...?
Poppsy, I could give you a kiss for bringing such good news.
I didn't think this night could get any better!
:kiss:

No thanks, random blokes do nothing for me, if you are a bloke that is.

[poppsywoppsy]

this is like saying you found garbage in the bin?

What tripe.

[BBUK-Fan]

How are people defending Andrew? Deluded

[poppsywoppsy]

Yes, arn't they, no better than him IMO

[GoldHeart]

Yes, arn't they, no better than him IMO

I bet he's going to be kissing every gay magazine and LGBT company like the pathetic desperate bitch he is :bored: .

He'll probably even have a drunken night with Shane J like he's hooked up with a call girl :notimpressed: .

[Withano]

Whatever the general census is in the Daily Mail comments, think the opposite of that, and you'll go far in life.

[Jake.]

this is like saying you found garbage in the bin?

:joker:

[Twosugars]

No thanks, random blokes do nothing for me, if you are a bloke that is.
first probing about my age, now gender - hold your horses, poppsy...

ok then, withdrawing the kiss offer; it was champagne talking anyway

...which reminds me, must refill the glass :hee:

[poppsywoppsy]

first probing about my age, now gender - hold your horses, poppsy...

ok then, withdrawing the kiss offer; it was champagne talking anyway

...which reminds me, must refill the glass :hee:

I don't know if you realise but poppsy is my dog. The one in the picture.

I am sure she has lots of wet kisses for you.

[Twosugars]

I don't know if you realise but poppsy is my dog. The one in the picture.

I am sure she has lots of wet kisses for you.

My beloved mastif died only two months ago, I'm still grieving. I miss him so much!!! If your poppsy was anywhere near me I'd hug her to death and let her lick my face as much as she wants. I miss doggie contact so much:sad:

[poppsywoppsy]

:dog:She is asleep with her Dad at the moment. No room for me.

Well must go, going to read the Daily Mail, no less.

[Twosugars]

This is my beloved doggie.

Ours slept with us too, when he stretched his paws he took up half the bed.

I'm off too.

[Marsh.]

Daily Mail readers filling the comments section with hate and bile?

Omg, WHAT A REVELATION!!!

[poppsywoppsy]

Daily Mail readers filling the comments section with hate and bile?

Omg, WHAT A REVELATION!!!

There are some and some, like on this forum. Mentioning no names :fist:

[Marsh.]

There are some and some, like on this forum. Mentioning no names :fist:
Thank you for answering a question nobody asked. :thumbs:

[jet]

This is my beloved doggie.

Ours slept with us too, when he stretched his paws he took up half the bed.

I'm off too.

Awww, he's so handsome. :)

[poppsywoppsy]

Awww, he's so handsome. :)

Yes, two sugars, He is gorgeous a real handsome boy.

It is heartbreaking, poppsy sends her :hugesmile:

[jet]

Daily Mail was always bad
It was easy back then

But The Indy and The Guardian have become left wing versions of the Daily Mail now
Same kind of sensationalist sh4t stirring but from another angle
Especially in the last couple of years

But there is still hilarious comments and occasional moments of wisdom from people in the comments section of all of them - always worth raking through

You really can't judge a whole readership as being one thing!
That's just being bigoted yourself.
People everywhere can come up with good stuff once in a while.
All forums are the same - you get a mixed bag of people from all perspectives, just like this site

Good post. I read a variety of papers for balance. It's more interesting to look at things from all sides rather than just closing your mind and saying "I'm not going to read anything that I won't agree with".

[Rob!]

Yes because the Daily Mail is known for it’s fair and non bigoted views

[jet]

Yes because the Daily Mail is known for it’s fair and non bigoted views

Generalisations are never helpful. All papers have their own slant, it's interesting to read the different takes on the same subjects from a variety of sources.

[Twosugars]

Awww, he's so handsome. :)

Yes, two sugars, He is gorgeous a real handsome boy.

It is heartbreaking, poppsy sends her :hugesmile:

...and he was such a gentle, sweet dog...

Aw, thank you guys :wavey:

[poppsywoppsy]

Good post. I read a variety of papers for balance. It's more interesting to look at things from all sides rather than just closing your mind and saying "I'm not going to read anything that I won't agree with".

Surprisingly whilst reading about CBB in the Telegraph celebs section, I was struck at how inaccurate it was. I am sure the person had not even seen the programme, yet sensationalized it along the lines the Daily Star uses.

I also read the Huffington Post when they have articles I am interested in.

But mention the Daily Mail and it brings out the wolves even when the article began its life in the Pink News.

People, viewers, posters all have their opinions, one each and to generalize on a whole newspaper readership by decrying it is short sighted.

[Brillopad]

Surprisingly whilst reading about CBB in the Telegraph celebs section, I was struck at how inaccurate it was. I am sure the person had not even seen the programme, yet sensationalized it along the lines the Daily Star uses.

I also read the Huffington Post when they have articles I am interested in.

But mention the Daily Mail and it brings out the wolves even when the article began its life in the Pink News.

People, viewers, posters all have their opinions, one each and to generalize on a whole newspaper readership by decrying it is short sighted.

:flowers:

[Robertocarlo]

The Daily Mail, the rag that supported Hitler and the NAZIS during the 1930s. Say no more!:fist::nono::fist::nono:

[jet]

Surprisingly whilst reading about CBB in the Telegraph celebs section, I was struck at how inaccurate it was. I am sure the person had not even seen the programme, yet sensationalized it along the lines the Daily Star uses.

I also read the Huffington Post when they have articles I am interested in.

But mention the Daily Mail and it brings out the wolves even when the article began its life in the Pink News.

People, viewers, posters all have their opinions, one each and to generalize on a whole newspaper readership by decrying it is short sighted.

Exactly. It's saying "Every word written in the DM is rubbish because I don't like what they say". Some people are so narrow minded their ears must rub together.

[Brillopad]

The Daily Mail, the rag that supported Hitler and the NAZIS during the 1930s. Say no more!:fist::nono::fist::nono:

:sleep:

[poppsywoppsy]

The Daily Mail, the rag that supported Hitler and the NAZIS during the 1930s. Say no more!:fist::nono::fist::nono:

Nearly 90 years ago?

What a ridiculous comparison.

Though a typical example of my point.

[Parmy]

Can we quote the metro?

[Twosugars]

Nearly 90 years ago?

What a ridiculous comparison.

Though a typical example of my point.

So far, it seems there's not much support for your paper of choice, popps

I hope you're not on commission

[GoldHeart]

So far, it seems there's not much support for your paper of choice, popps

I hope you're not on commission

There's alot of newspapers that talk crap and twist stuff for their own biased agenda.