View Full Version : When the Queen dies should Charles step aside and let William reign?
Kate!
10-06-2019, 03:26 PM
Poll coming....
I think he should stand aside. He and Camilla are hardly popular with the general public and William is very loved. It would be the right thing to do imo. But I can't see it happening unfortunately.
Firewire
10-06-2019, 03:28 PM
They should abolish the monarchy altogether, to be quite honest.
Kate!
10-06-2019, 03:29 PM
They should abolish the monarchy altogether, to be quite honest.
Here for this.
Have a president instead.
Calderyon
10-06-2019, 03:29 PM
Abolish the monarchy altogether. Should have been done ages ago.
Cherie
10-06-2019, 03:31 PM
I like the Monarchs, and I think Charles should be King, I think the public have softened alot towards Camilla as well
Liam-
10-06-2019, 03:31 PM
If Camilla was going to be Queen, then I’d say yeah, he should, but seeing as they’ve confirmed she’ll just be the King’s Consort, then he should take the throne, he’s trained for it so let him have it, he won’t be on there for long anyway
Here for this.
Have a president instead.I can see it now, President Tommy Robinson
user104658
10-06-2019, 03:36 PM
I'm also anti-monarchy but of the poll choice, Charles should step aside. A "younger" and more progressive Monarchy might actually stand a chance of doing the country some good.
Scrap the monarchy with the tv license, win/win
arista
10-06-2019, 03:38 PM
Poll coming....
I think he should stand aside. He and Camilla are hardly popular with the general public and William is very loved. It would be the right thing to do imo. But I can't see it happening unfortunately.
No Charles wants it.
Shaun
10-06-2019, 03:39 PM
Charles is a much better guy than William. Done a ton of good for the country, don't see why he should have to step aside unless he wanted to.
arista
10-06-2019, 03:39 PM
I can see it now, President Tommy Robinson
You are having a laugh.
Niamh.
10-06-2019, 03:44 PM
Poor Charles has been waiting and waiting for his shot on the throne and you're trying to steal it away from him? :o maybe payback for being a **** to Lady Di though
joeysteele
10-06-2019, 04:04 PM
No.
Keep the succession going.
Charles is the next, if he feit he couldn't and wanted to step aside, fair enough.
Wizard.
10-06-2019, 04:06 PM
Charles should be King, it's just the way it is, and the Queen wants him to be so her wishes should be respected.
Marsh.
10-06-2019, 04:06 PM
The Queen has held on this long for precisely this reason.
She's keeping her bony fingers tight hold of that crown until Charles croaks it, even if it means living to 112.
Wizard.
10-06-2019, 04:07 PM
The Queen has held on this long for precisely this reason.
She's keeping her bony fingers tight hold of that crown until Charles croaks it, even if it means living to 112.
:joker:
Denver
10-06-2019, 04:11 PM
For the people who say abolish the monarchy do realise that is the main reason for our tourism? Ain't nobody coming to spend a weekend in Skegness
smudgie
10-06-2019, 04:26 PM
Charles.
He has trained for it most of his life.
William will get his turn soon enough.
Morgan.
10-06-2019, 04:35 PM
For the people who say abolish the monarchy do realise that is the main reason for our tourism? Ain't nobody coming to spend a weekend in Skegness
Because Skegness is the second largest tourist attraction behind the monarchy?
Shaun
10-06-2019, 04:36 PM
Poor Charles has been waiting and waiting for his shot on the throne and you're trying to steal it away from him? :o maybe payback for being a **** to Lady Di though
Idk much about them but considering they both had affairs I'd have said it was 50/50?
Twosugars
10-06-2019, 04:55 PM
Idk much about them but considering they both had affairs I'd have said it was 50/50?
He was first and made her look elsewhere, the tampon
Kate!
10-06-2019, 04:58 PM
Idk much about them but considering they both had affairs I'd have said it was 50/50?
Charles was cheating with Camilla the whole time though. Even when he and Diana were engaged and then it carried on into the marriage. Diana had her affair because she was trapped in a loveless marriage.
Charles was cheating with Camilla the whole time though. Even when he and Diana were engaged and then it carried on into the marriage. Diana had her affair because she was trapped in a loveless marriage.
I think Diana had mental issues aside from Charles behaviour. She also had multiple affairs. There was the rugby player as well as Hewitt and there may have been more :laugh:
I would say each was as bad as the other, although i still believe to this day she was murdered.
Twosugars
10-06-2019, 05:03 PM
Charles was cheating with Camilla the whole time though. Even when he and Diana were engaged and then it carried on into the marriage. Diana had her affair because she was trapped in a loveless marriage.
This
Kate!
10-06-2019, 05:04 PM
I think Diana had mental issues aside from Charles behaviour. She also had multiple affairs. There was the rugby player as well as Hewitt and there may have been more :laugh:
I would say each was as bad as the other, although i still believe to this day she was murdered.
Yes I also believe Di had mental health issues and that Charles caused them or at the least made them worse.
Niamh.
10-06-2019, 05:12 PM
Idk much about them but considering they both had affairs I'd have said it was 50/50?He was seeing Camilla before, during and after they got married, it's no wonder she looked elsewhere. He married her with no intention of being faithful, that makes him the **** imo
reece(:
10-06-2019, 05:18 PM
The Queen has held on this long for precisely this reason.
She's keeping her bony fingers tight hold of that crown until Charles croaks it, even if it means living to 112.
Omg :skull:
Marsh.
10-06-2019, 05:18 PM
I think Diana had mental issues aside from Charles behaviour. She also had multiple affairs. There was the rugby player as well as Hewitt and there may have been more :laugh:
I would say each was as bad as the other, although i still believe to this day she was murdered.
I'd say that wasn't her intention at the start. The affairs for her only began once she realised she'd basically been hoodwinked into birthing some heirs for a selfish and entitled Prince. Which makes a big difference imo. He never loved her, he just needed her to keep up appearances.
...although I agree with what Marsh has just said regarding Charles’ infidelities...his boys have a great relationship with him and great love for him...and they also seem to have great affection for Camilla...and on the whole I think he’d make an outstanding King...
Amy Jade
10-06-2019, 05:47 PM
Get Camilla on the throne!
Marsh.
10-06-2019, 05:58 PM
She's probably already been on the throne, and done unspeakable things, whilst poor Liz is sleeping.
Liam-
10-06-2019, 06:01 PM
She's probably already been on the throne, and done unspeakable things, whilst poor Liz is sleeping.
‘shh Camilla, one doesn’t want to wake mumsy’
*spanks her with the royal sceptre*
...or maybe she pees around the throne because she doesn’t have great aim either..?...silly old Camilly....
Liam-
10-06-2019, 06:06 PM
...or maybe she pees around the throne because she doesn’t have great aim either..?...silly old Camilly....
She’s learnt to mark her territory to scare off the corgis
Strictly Jake
10-06-2019, 06:08 PM
I still think Harry is hewitts son rather than Charles...
I think Charles should get to have his turn on the throne
William will get the throne not long after but I predict a daeny type power trip
Marsh.
10-06-2019, 06:12 PM
I still think Harry is hewitts son rather than Charles...
Nah, apart from the ginger hair he looks like Charles.
She’s learnt to mark her territory to scare off the corgis
...or marking her territory with William and Kate..?...
...or marking her territory with William and Kate..?...
they were all peeing on the throne? :o
Amy Jade
10-06-2019, 06:30 PM
Stop this horrid Camilla slander right now!
Jordan.
10-06-2019, 07:06 PM
The fact we could have 3 king reigns before another kween is a nightmare, literally a nightmare
Marsh.
10-06-2019, 07:15 PM
We should have Liz stuffed and keep her.
user104658
10-06-2019, 08:22 PM
The fact we could have 3 king reigns before another kween is a nightmare, literally a nightmareEveryone on this forum will be dead and buried before there's even a chance of there being another queen. Sorreh.
Vicky.
10-06-2019, 08:31 PM
Everytie anyone mentions Charles, I get awful awful images on my head..after tampongate :laugh:
Yeah, personally I do think it would make sense to give it William, however, can understand if he feels thas missing his chance..as it is really! Something he had waited for for a very long time.
Marsh.
10-06-2019, 08:33 PM
Everyone on this forum will be dead and buried before there's even a chance of there being another queen. Sorreh.
Or will they? :ninja2: :sniper:
user104658
10-06-2019, 10:16 PM
I guess George could be trans? Queen Georgia?
michael21
12-06-2019, 07:22 AM
Here for this.
Have a president instead.
That not really the same thing is it
And making any thread with when some one dies is stick
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.