Lord Sugar twitter backlash over anti-Corbyn tweet

[reece(:]

1156897022265430018
1157006351970840579
1157015430382460929
1156995001731158016
1157024323380662278
1157008280314687490
1157020823212961792
1157028599339388928
1157066989380218881

Not one of them respondents lied!

[Twosugars]

Sugar ****ed up, no question

[Liam-]

Tasteless, classless moron, using the victims of religious genocide to try and make a political point is something he’d probably be against if it was the other way around, absolute cockwomble

[Crimson Dynamo]

This is blasphemy @TwitterSupport This man is literally unhinged, deeply disturbed, deeply disturbing.
And of course a Member for Life of the British Parliament #Lords.hite


:laugh2:

[Twosugars]

I take Sugar is on holiday in Italy :idc:

[Oliver_W]

Comparing those martyrs to that shower is truly disgusting.

[Twosugars]

This emoticon seems a good summary of this affair :skull:

[Livia]

Alan Sugar is Jewish. He has no time for Corbyn, and while is joke is in poor taste look at all the people outraged at what a Jew has said about their leader.

[Matthew.]

#Lord****e :joker:

[arista]

Sugar is Fool
at times

[Marsh.]

Alan Sugar is Jewish. He has no time for Corbyn, and while is joke is in poor taste look at all the people outraged at what a Jew has said about their leader.

They seem more offended at the disrespect shown to the martyrs than Corbyn himself.

Your whataboutery has no limit.

[Livia]

They seem more offended at the disrespect shown to the martyrs than Corbyn himself.

Your whataboutery has no limit.

And this thread seems the same... people worried about dead martyrs, although if he'd mentioned anyone but Corbyn this thread wouldn't exist, while being okay with the state of anti-Semitism in the Labour party.

This doesn't count as whataboutery, my post was about Corbyn, the subject of Jewish Sugar's tweet.

[Crimson Dynamo]

They seem more offended at the disrespect shown to the martyrs than Corbyn himself.

Your whataboutery has no limit.

disrepsct for martyrs?


that is probably remains from a plague pit - and martyrs to what - do you seriously believe the Catholic church?

[bots]

Can no-one take a joke these days?

[Twosugars]

disrepsct for martyrs?


that is probably remains from a plague pit - and martyrs to what - do you seriously believe the Catholic church?

Have some decency!
It's not a plague pit, educate yourself
And even if it was, human remains deserve some respect.

If he wanted to compare corbyn to a skull he could find a pic of a plastic one.
If it was a teenager ok, but Sugar should know better

[Twosugars]

Can no-one take a joke these days?

But why drag remains that a sacred to some into it?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Have some decency!
It's not a plague pit, educate yourself
And even if it was, human remains deserve some respect.

If he wanted to compare corbyn to a skull he could find a pic of a plastic one.
If it was a teenager ok, but Sugar should know better

Its common knowledge that almost 99.99% of "martyr" remains and artefacts are fake

Id imagine these remains are from paupers graves. And i have no respect whatsoever for the Catholic church

[Twosugars]

Its common knowledge that almost 99.99% of "martyr" remains and artefacts are fake

Id imagine these remains are from paupers graves. And i have no respect whatsoever for the Catholic church

Do you know these are fake?
Have respect for human remains, not the church
Your frequent attempts to show contempt for believers are tedious. They are people too.
Holding every believer as responsible for the worst excesses of their religious hierarchy is wrong

[Marsh.]

disrepsct for martyrs?


that is probably remains from a plague pit - and martyrs to what - do you seriously believe the Catholic church?

:facepalm: It's not about what you do or don't believe.

They were innocent people slaughtered for their beliefs. Yet he's using them to make cheap jokes.

[Marsh.]

And this thread seems the same... people worried about dead martyrs, although if he'd mentioned anyone but Corbyn this thread wouldn't exist, while being okay with the state of anti-Semitism in the Labour party.

This doesn't count as whataboutery, my post was about Corbyn, the subject of Jewish Sugar's tweet.

So you're making it about members and not the topic?
How do you know what reece would have posted? :unsure:

Nobody's "worried" about dead martyrs. They're pointing out a sick tweet where they see it.

[Kizzy]

And this thread seems the same... people worried about dead martyrs, although if he'd mentioned anyone but Corbyn this thread wouldn't exist, while being okay with the state of anti-Semitism in the Labour party.

This doesn't count as whataboutery, my post was about Corbyn, the subject of Jewish Sugar's tweet.

Corbyn wasn't the subject of the tweet... the shadow cabinet was. You're so quick to make an Anti Corbyn comment I don't think you even realised.
Sugar was anti Corbyn as party leader way before the issue of antisemitism in the party membership, therefore the suggestion that Sugar being Jewish is the only reason for his rude comments is not a given.
Further to that the fact he is Jewish is not a green light to be as offensive as possible to those who serve in the shadow cabinet :/.

[Crimson Dynamo]

:facepalm: It's not about what you do or don't believe.

They were innocent people slaughtered for their beliefs. Yet he's using them to make cheap jokes.

Yes and i am saying that it is highly likely its total BS, just like the made up man in the sky. Its much more likely to be hearsay and random bones. Churches used "martyr porn" to give then power and status

This is a cult that hides paedos rather than get bad PR

[bots]

Corbyn wasn't the subject of the tweet... the shadow cabinet was. You're so quick to make an Anti Corbyn comment I don't think you even realised.
Sugar was anti Corbyn as party leader way before the issue of antisemitism in the party membership, therefore the suggestion that Sugar being Jewish is the only reason for his rude comments is not a given.
Further to that the fact he is Jewish is not a green light to be as offensive as possible to those who serve in the shadow cabinet :/.

Her are the skulls in the cathedral in Otranto Italy . Looks like @jeremycorbyn shadow cabinet

That very much mentions jeremy corbyn

[Marsh.]

Yes and i am saying that it is highly likely its total BS, just like the made up man in the sky. Its much more likely to be hearsay and random bones. Churches used "martyr porn" to give then power and status

This is a cult that hides paedos rather than get bad PR

That's an awful lot of ifs and maybes to attempt to justify Sugar disrespecting the dead.

[Twosugars]

Her are the skulls in the cathedral in Otranto Italy . Looks like @jeremycorbyn shadow cabinet

That very much mentions jeremy corbyn

With corbyn in genitive and shadow cabinet as the object. Grammar, bots.
He is talking about the shadow cabinet of corbyn

[Crimson Dynamo]

That's an awful lot of ifs and maybes to attempt to justify Sugar disrespecting the dead.

You are welcome to verify what I have posted with some online research and you will find it all in order

[Twosugars]

Next smashing religious cemeteries bc who cares?

[Marsh.]

You are welcome to verify what I have posted with some online research and you will find it all in order

An opinion on whether Sugar's tweet was in bad taste needs verifying with online research?

Sure Jan.

[Kizzy]

Her are the skulls in the cathedral in Otranto Italy . Looks like @jeremycorbyn shadow cabinet

That very much mentions jeremy corbyn

I didn't say it didn't mention him...I said he wasn't the subject...

[Crimson Dynamo]

An opinion on whether Sugar's tweet was in bad taste needs verifying with online research?

Sure Jan.

Taste is just an opinion not a fact

[Kizzy]

'Look at all the people outraged at what a Jew has said about their leader.'

In this instance he said nothing about the party leader.

[Marsh.]

Taste is just an opinion not a fact

Erm...

An opinion on whether Sugar's tweet was in bad taste needs verifying with online research?

Sure Jan.

Read it again.

[Kazanne]

Why are some people going on about respecting the dead when we have a thread where you have to guess the day people die !!! and get points for any that are correct.

[reece(:]

So you're making it about members and not the topic?
How do you know what reece would have posted? :unsure:

Nobody's "worried" about dead martyrs. They're pointing out a sick tweet where they see it.
I do wish everything wouldn't get made into personal jibes, re-highlights exactly what I said the other day
Why are people going on about respecting the dead when we have a thread where you have to guess the day people die !!! and get points for any that are correct.

Well I don't partake in that "game" so I can go on about respecting the dead as much as I like. Why does everything have to be point scoring and one upping? Just accept Sugar was wrong....

[Twosugars]

Why are some people going on about respecting the dead when we have a thread where you have to guess the day people die !!! and get points for any that are correct.

Ask in that thread then
Otherwise stay on topic

[Alf]

But why drag remains that a sacred to some into it?Why not?

[Kazanne]

Ask in that thread then
Otherwise stay on topic

Don't tell me what to do and say , I will post where I like , its on topic .

[Twosugars]

Don't tell me what to do and say , I will post where I like , its on topic .

Telling that as a religious person you have nothing to say on this topic but baiting

[Twosugars]

Why not?

Why yes?

[Jake.]

An automated BBC-typed apology will no doubt follow soon

[Crimson Dynamo]

the Martyrs of Otranto, were 813 inhabitants of the Salentine city of Otranto in southern Italy who were killed on 14 August 1480. The mass execution is often explained as taking place after the Otrantins refused to convert to Islam when the city fell to an Ottoman force under Gedik Ahmed Pasha.

wiki


:skull:

[Liam-]

Why are some people going on about respecting the dead when we have a thread where you have to guess the day people die !!! and get points for any that are correct.

There’s a big difference between guessing who’ll die and openly using those people who were slaughtered for their religion to mock people you don’t like politically.

He’d be after blood if someone mocked him or anybody else with a picture of Auschwitz victims and we all know it

[Northern Monkey]

Are we really getting all butthurt about some people who died in the fourteen hundreds?
Honestly,If it wasn’t against Labour no one would give a ****.

[Kazanne]

Are we really getting all butthurt about some people who died in the fourteen hundreds?
Honestly,If it wasn’t against Labour no one would give a ****.

Of course they wouldn't NM,it's just another excuse for some to have a go at someone.Infact we'de probably have had various commercial pics on it, had it been said about Boris.

[Twosugars]

Of course they wouldn't NM,it's just another excuse for some to have a go at someone.Infact we'de probably have had various commercial pics on it, had it been said about Boris.

Bc you know better and can read minds :umm2:
Sugar can compare corbyn to satan for all I care, just dont involve the remains of innocent people

And how telling that although you're religious you still can't bring yourself to condemning the use of relics sacred to a religion only bc it doesn't suit your politics

[Alf]

Jesus wept! I just got infracted for singing "Dem bones"

You mods really don't like me, do you?

I expect you to infarct me for this post too, that's why I posted it.

See you all in a month or two.

[Kazanne]

Jesus wept! I just got infracted for singing "Dem bones"

You mods really don't like me, do you?

I expect you to infarct me for this post too, that's why I posted it.

See you all in a month or two.

It's laughable Alf especially when some get away with much worse,chin up enjoy the break

[Kazanne]

Bc you know better and can read minds :umm2:
Sugar can compare corbyn to satan for all I care, just dont involve the remains of innocent people

And how telling that although you're religious you still can't bring yourself to condemning the use of relics sacred to a religion only bc it doesn't suit your politics

Oh be quiet,you don't know the first thing about me ,so stop pretending you do,I do not convey my thoughts to you as I find you quite rude.so maybe ignore me in future that would be good.

[Twosugars]

Oh be quiet,you don't know the first thing about me ,so stop pretending you do,I do not convey my thoughts to you as I find you quite rude.so maybe ignore me in future that would be good.

Only commenting on your posts, on a public forum. Nothing more or nothing less. :)
Don't post if you don't want replies :shrug:
Otherwise don't tell me to be quiet. I'm not here to be liked by you, but to have a debate.

[Cherie]

Jesus wept! I just got infracted for singing "Dem bones"

You mods really don't like me, do you?

I expect you to infarct me for this post too, that's why I posted it.

See you all in a month or two.


:umm2: likely someone reported you then Alf

[Kizzy]

Why are some people going on about respecting the dead when we have a thread where you have to guess the day people die !!! and get points for any that are correct.

How is this relevant here....there are lots of silly threads in chat and games, how does that mean that nobody in this thread can find that tweet distasteful?

[smudgie]

If the bones and skulls are so openly on show, I can’t see why a comment or joke about them is so taboo.
If they deserve respect then give them it and bury them in peace.:shrug:

[Twosugars]

If the bones and skulls are so openly on show, I can’t see why a comment or joke about them is so taboo.
If they deserve respect then give them it and bury them in peace.:shrug:

These people were declared saints and it is a tradition, where possible or appropriate, to display relics of saints.
Sugar should know better, basically.

[Kizzy]

Well.. I'm not religious but it seems to me it's ok to Diss religion and religious history as long as it's not your religion being dissed?

[Kazanne]

How is this relevant here....there are lots of silly threads in chat and games, how does that mean that nobody in this thread can find that tweet distasteful?

Just pointing outcome double standards on here at times :shrug:

[DouglasS]

Not going to lie I bet a lot of people who visit that Museum have made a pass away joke/comment to a friend, whether it be tasteless or not. I think people are too easily offended now.

[Marsh.]

Why are some people going on about respecting the dead when we have a thread where you have to guess the day people die !!! and get points for any that are correct.

Explain how that is relevant to me or this thread?

Why are some people so intent on siding with their friends they're literally grasping at straws?

[Marsh.]

Not going to lie I bet a lot of people who visit that Museum have made a pass away joke/comment to a friend, whether it be tasteless or not. I think people are too easily offended now.

They're not supposed "Lord" broadcasting it to the public.

Nor have you provided an example that can be discussed as it's a non existent hypothetical.

[bots]

These people were declared saints and it is a tradition, where possible or appropriate, to display relics of saints.
Sugar should know better, basically.

there is no law against making a joke against a religious relic, certainly in the civilised world. Sugar made a joke .... A JOKE ... that's all

[Marsh.]

Of course they wouldn't NM,it's just another excuse for some to have a go at someone.Infact we'de probably have had various commercial pics on it, had it been said about Boris.

Are you gonna comment on the topic or keep making comments on members based on hypotheticals that exist nowhere but in your head?

I could just as easily have said you'd be saying the opposite if Corbyn mocked Sugar with a picture of Jewish skeletons at Auschwitz.

[Kizzy]

Just pointing outcome double standards on here at times :shrug:

Not really, there are lots of different members, it doesn't naturally follow that the people in this debate then go into chat and games to chat about dead people so where's the double standard?

[Marsh.]

Oh be quiet,you don't know the first thing about me ,so stop pretending you do.

The same goes for you mind reading everyone else in this thread.

[Marsh.]

Just pointing outcome double standards on here at times :shrug:

I'm sorry we're all responsible for everything posted on the forum?

I don't think so darling.

[Kazanne]

Explain how that is relevant to me or this thread?

Why are some people so intent on siding with their friends they're literally grasping at straws?

I thought it quite simple Marsh, some are up in arms about disrespecting the dead but are quite happy to make a game of it when it suits, I am not siding with friends it's my opinion,the tweet was wrong , it's just a bit much when people come over holier than thou when they play games about death.

[Marsh.]

I thought it quite simple Marsh, some are up in arms about disrespecting the dead but are quite happy to make a game of it when it suits, I am not siding with friends it's my opinion,the tweet was wrong , it's just a bit much when people come over holier than thou when they play games about death.

Who makes the game?

You need to be specific?

Because throwing everyone into one basket doesn't work. I've never taken part in that game in my life so drop the ridiculous tangent and stick to the story provided in the OP, eh?

[Kazanne]

Who makes the game?

You need to be specific?

Because throwing everyone into one basket doesn't work. I've never taken part in that game in my life so drop the ridiculous tangent and stick to the story provided in the OP, eh?

I didn't say ALL members,just some

[Marsh.]

I didn't say ALL members,just some

Well discussing members is against the rules isn't it Kaz?

You're normally cheerleading Chuff on that front so let's not get into double standards, eh?

[reece(:]

Turning every thread to about the members is getting more tiring by the day, can you not have debate without making it personal?

[Kazanne]

Well discussing members is against the rules isn't it Kaz?

You're normally cheerleading Chuff on that front so let's not get into double standards, eh?

Very unfair comment as Chuff is not on here much and we don't always agree,isn't she a member that you are discussing aswell, no need to bring her into everything , I agree with some people ,others I do not, that's not cheerleading, it's the way we all are .

[DouglasS]

Are you gonna comment on the topic or keep making comments on members based on hypotheticals that exist nowhere but in your head?

I could just as easily have said you'd be saying the opposite if Corbyn mocked Sugar with a picture of Jewish skeletons at Auschwitz.

I mean it’s not a non existent hypothetical - some people have a dark humour, I bet countless people have made a joke similar - doesn’t mean they’re bad people or should be crucified online. It might be a non existent hypothetical if you are sheltered and haven’t met lots of different people in the real world

I don’t agree with what he said and it is a bit tasteless, but I find it a little embarrassing for people to have such an OTT reaction to something that was a tasteless joke

[Twosugars]

I didn't say ALL members,just some

I never played that game and yet you jumped at me

[Ammi]

...George Galloway wants the Pope to intervene...?..I’m not sure what type of intervention is hoped for...Kazanne mentioned the Death Thread, which isn’t relevant at all...and yet it is in that it shows how frivolous/flippancy etc can walk side by side with respect...sometimes something ‘inappropriate or unwise’ might pop into our head and off our tongue and I think that would probably apply to all of us...and if when it happened..if we were celebrity and if we tweeted it....ooops, how very awful...I feel that all of his insult was directed at the shadow cabinet and not the long dead Christian martyrs...

[Kizzy]

Divine intervention obv.... he needs a good old smiting :)

[Kazanne]

I never played that game and yet you jumped at me

Go back and see my first post in here , I never jumped on YOU at all , if anything it was the other way round, stop thinking everything is about you, you responded by being rude , so I answered you in a likewise manner. Now lets just get back on topic shall we ? Ican see why Sugar doesn't like Corbyn,but he should have chosen a better way to express it, but some people do over react.

[Kizzy]

Go back and see my first post in here , I never jumped on YOU at all , if anything it was the other way round, stop thinking everything is about you, you responded by being rude , so I answered you in a likewise manner. Now lets just get back on topic shall we ? Ican see why Sugar doesn't like Corbyn,but he should have chosen a better way to express it, but some people do over react.

2s wasn't the only one to take exception to your comment, several people did 2s was just the first.
How do you express your dislike for someone for by insulting the people around them?...

[bots]

Ever since time began, jokes have been made about tragic events ... it's human nature, and I am so disappointed that the world has gotten so frightened of saying the wrong thing that it's lost all its humour

A kids joke that was going round at the time of a particularly tragic event .... Why should you not wear loose fitting underwear .... cause cher nob l fallout

Another ... where did the shuttle crew go on holiday ... i wont state that one here

The point is, humour has always been associated with death and tragedy, tasteless maybe, but still humour ... and it's really grim that people try and stop it now because it doesn't fit with their particular political agenda, because as others have said, if the jibe was free of politics, people would be laughing their heads off.

[Livia]

Explain how that is relevant to me or this thread?

Why are some people so intent on siding with their friends they're literally grasping at straws?

Because that particular thread treats death with irreverence. I don't take part in it.... I find it distasteful, but I don't stop other people taking part.

We have thread after thread on here where people ridicule religion and people of faith. The consensus is, how stupid people are to believe fairy stories in an old book probably written by out of work camel drivers. But... if someone is perceived to have insulted Corbyn, suddenly everyone cares about disrespect being shown to Christian martyrs.

[Livia]

I didn't say ALL members,just some

Kazanne…. step away from the bullsh1t.

[Cherie]

Because that particular thread treats death with irreverence. I don't take part in it.... I find it distasteful, but I don't stop other people taking part.

We have thread after thread on here where people ridicule religion and people of faith. The consensus is, how stupid people are to believe fairy stories in an old book probably written by out of work camel drivers. But... if someone is perceived to have insulted Corbyn, suddenly everyone cares about disrespect being shown to Christian martyrs.

:clap1:

[Cherie]

Ever since time began, jokes have been made about tragic events ... it's human nature, and I am so disappointed that the world has gotten so frightened of saying the wrong thing that it's lost all its humour

A kids joke that was going round at the time of a particularly tragic event .... Why should you not wear loose fitting underwear .... cause cher nob l fallout

Another ... where did the shuttle crew go on holiday ... i wont state that one here

The point is, humour has always been associated with death and tragedy, tasteless maybe, but still humour ... and it's really grim that people try and stop it now because it doesn't fit with their particular political agenda, because as others have said, if the jibe was free of politics, people would be laughing their heads off.


omg I was going to post the cher kno will fall off joke on the Chernoybl to see if anyone had heard of it, trust you BOTS :joker:

[Tom4784]

A lot of people downplaying this would be screeching in outrage if a left winger said this about the right or if it was labour saying this about a Tory/Brexit party member.

Partisanship at it's finest....

As for the tweet itself, it's just typical dumbass baby boomer humour, inane, pointless and just plain dumb.

[Kizzy]

Ever since time began, jokes have been made about tragic events ... it's human nature, and I am so disappointed that the world has gotten so frightened of saying the wrong thing that it's lost all its humour

A kids joke that was going round at the time of a particularly tragic event .... Why should you not wear loose fitting underwear .... cause cher nob l fallout

Another ... where did the shuttle crew go on holiday ... i wont state that one here

The point is, humour has always been associated with death and tragedy, tasteless maybe, but still humour ... and it's really grim that people try and stop it now because it doesn't fit with their particular political agenda, because as others have said, if the jibe was free of politics, people would be laughing their heads off.
Do you know what peers are? What they do?...do you not feel that its distasteful for someone of his supposed standing to be engaging in such juvenile humour about elected officials?...
Can we not look past the alleged 'humour' in the tweet, that is not the issue. It's the disrespect.

I'm not doubting this tweet had some rolling on the floor laughing, I'm also not doubting black humour exists.

But lets see this for what it is, childish mocking from a guy who bought his way into the Lords towards the elected shadow cabinet ...he even manages to offend Catholics too well done 'lord' Sugar.

[Livia]

Do I have to ask why people are suddenly defensive of the Catholic church? I've not seen such hypocrisy on here since... yesterday.

[Kizzy]

I haven't defended anyone...not suggesting you're referring to me of course. I made a reference to offence to Catholics is all.

[Marsh.]

Because that particular thread treats death with irreverence. I don't take part in it.... I find it distasteful, but I don't stop other people taking part.

We have thread after thread on here where people ridicule religion and people of faith. The consensus is, how stupid people are to believe fairy stories in an old book probably written by out of work camel drivers. But... if someone is perceived to have insulted Corbyn, suddenly everyone cares about disrespect being shown to Christian martyrs.

It's just changing topic to be about members. Nothing more, nothing less.

The thread is not relevant unless she's specifically referring to members in this thread. Which she refuses to clarify.

As for the religious insults, people do care. Religious debates have been repeated on this forum ad nauseam for years. It's probably hit the point where people avoid them like the plague. Like I do, not because I don't have an opinion on it, but it's literally repeating the same debate for the 1000th time.

[Marsh.]

Ever since time began, jokes have been made about tragic events ... it's human nature, and I am so disappointed that the world has gotten so frightened of saying the wrong thing that it's lost all its humour

A kids joke that was going round at the time of a particularly tragic event .... Why should you not wear loose fitting underwear .... cause cher nob l fallout

Another ... where did the shuttle crew go on holiday ... i wont state that one here

The point is, humour has always been associated with death and tragedy, tasteless maybe, but still humour ... and it's really grim that people try and stop it now because it doesn't fit with their particular political agenda, because as others have said, if the jibe was free of politics, people would be laughing their heads off.

So... kids jokes are an appropriate method of public communication for a member of the house of Lords?

Good grief.

[Marsh.]

I mean it’s not a non existent hypothetical - some people have a dark humour, I bet countless people have made a joke similar - doesn’t mean they’re bad people or should be crucified online. It might be a non existent hypothetical if you are sheltered and haven’t met lots of different people in the real world

I don’t agree with what he said and it is a bit tasteless, but I find it a little embarrassing for people to have such an OTT reaction to something that was a tasteless joke

It is non existent since you're talking about "people in a museum". Not actually referring to anyone real or specific.

[Marsh.]

Very unfair comment as Chuff is not on here much and we don't always agree,isn't she a member that you are discussing aswell, no need to bring her into everything , I agree with some people ,others I do not, that's not cheerleading, it's the way we all are .

Double standard.

[Marsh.]

Do I have to ask why people are suddenly defensive of the Catholic church? I've not seen such hypocrisy on here since... yesterday.

"People" "Why people are defensive?"

Because they are?

It's not hypocritical unless you're referring to someone specific and have proof they're acting hypocritically.

But, yeah, you won't add substance to the statement.

[chuff me dizzy]

If the bones and skulls are so openly on show, I can’t see why a comment or joke about them is so taboo.
If they deserve respect then give them it and bury them in peace.:shrug:

Spot on Smudgie !!

[joeysteele]

I neither care whether any find what Sugar says offensive, funny, interesting or irrelevant.

I think the man ignorant, pompous and I've never liked him and likely never will.

An overgrown idiot, playing at stupid games even on his programmes.
Where he has to play the almighty and sits under the delusion he can fire people even before he's hired them.

What a waste of space and time.
In my view.

[Marsh.]

I neither care whether any find what Sugar says offensive, funny, interesting or irrelevant.

I think the man ignorant, pompous and I've never liked him and likely never will.

An overgrown idiot, playing at stupid games even on his programmes.
Where he has to play the almighty and sits under the delusion he can fire people even before he's hired them.

What a waste of space and time.
In my view.

And insists they call him "Lord". Absolute arse Joey, you're spot on.

[Twosugars]

I've read some ridiculous reaching in this thread claiming this crass insensitive humour is ok for teens so it's ok for a peer of the realm, that we shouldn't be defending the church or religion bc they're bad, that the bones are on show so free for all to take the piss out of, etc etc.
I dont begrudge Sugar having fun at Corbyn's expense, political caricature has a long and important tradition.
But dont drag human remains into it, especially those important to a different religion. Why do it? Corbyn has nothing to do with the catholic church anyway.
Take a pic of a flock of sheep or a pile of bricks and compare them to the shadow cabinet.
Dont go into a church and show your contempt to a different tradition if you expect your traditions to be respected.

[Marsh.]

I've read some ridiculous reaching in this thread claiming this crass insensitive humour is ok for teens so it's ok for a peer of the realm, that we shouldn't be defending the church or religion bc they're bad, that the bones are on show so free for all to take the piss out of, etc etc.
I dont begrudge Sugar having fun at Corbyn's expense, political caricature has a long and important tradition.
But dont drag human remains into it, especially those important to a different religion. Why do it? Corbyn has nothing to do with the catholic church anyway.
Take a pic of a flock of sheep or a pile of bricks and compare them to the shadow cabinet.
Dont go into a church and show your contempt to a different tradition if you expect your traditions to be respected.

:clap1:

That last sentence, especially.

[joeysteele]

And insists they call him "Lord". Absolute arse Joey, you're spot on.

Yes Marsh.
You described him better than I did.