Log in

View Full Version : Lack of men means......


Glenn.
12-06-2007, 03:07 PM
Do you suppose the lack of men from the start would mean there will be a female winner. Maybe the producers want a female winner this year. A possibilitly?:puzzled:

Revol
12-06-2007, 03:08 PM
Are you also suggesting a female will win London 2012?

mat118
12-06-2007, 03:09 PM
but with all females, they all start bitching about each other, and everyone hates them.

xxxxxsammiexxxxx
12-06-2007, 03:09 PM
oooo good point:thumbs: i think they are twistin things they just want it to be good tv i dnt think they are botherd bout winners they jus want viewer ratings

Glenn.
12-06-2007, 03:14 PM
Originally posted by VCK
Are you also suggesting a female will win London 2012?
oooo good point i think they are twistin things they just want it to be good tv i dont think they are botherd bout winners they jus want viewer ratings

No.
But maybe they want us to get ot know the girls more than the boys. If not then it would be the first newcomer to win a Big Brother

Callum
12-06-2007, 03:16 PM
Maybe, yes. I would like to see a girl winner this year :)

Glenn.
12-06-2007, 03:23 PM
Originally posted by Callum
Maybe, yes. I would like to see a girl winner this year :)

Yes I agree. I would love to see a girl triumph this year:thumbs:

Psylocke
12-06-2007, 03:29 PM
It shouldnt be about gender that determines the winner,it should be personality

Glenn.
12-06-2007, 03:44 PM
Originally posted by Psylocke
It shouldnt be about gender that determines the winner,it should be personality

Its not about gender, we are merlely saying we would like to see one of the girls win this year. Except the usual bloke