Log in

View Full Version : G7 Summit France:Biarritz 24th - 26th August 2019


arista
20-08-2019, 03:52 PM
Participants:
Canada : Justin Trudeau Prime Minister
France : Emmanuel Macron President
Germany : Angela Merkel Chancellor
Italy : Giuseppe Conte --leader may change
Japan : Shinzō Abe Prime Minister
United Kingdom : Boris Johnson Prime Minister
United States : Donald Trump President
European Union : Donald Tusk Council President


Guests:
Australia Scott Morrison Prime Minister
India Narendra Modi Prime Minister
Spain Pedro Sánchez Prime Minister

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/45th_G7_summit

1107531793140469760


A Chance for PM Johnson to talk with President Trump
in private.

Kate!
20-08-2019, 03:55 PM
I dread to think.

arista
20-08-2019, 03:56 PM
I dread to think.


A Chance to do deals
in private

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/G7_une_fd_cle841133.jpg/220px-G7_une_fd_cle841133.jpg

Twosugars
20-08-2019, 04:44 PM
A Chance to do deals
in private

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/G7_une_fd_cle841133.jpg/220px-G7_une_fd_cle841133.jpg

Yup. Sell farmers and nhs

arista
20-08-2019, 04:48 PM
Yup. Sell farmers and nhs


No the NHS is not for sale

Twosugars
20-08-2019, 04:54 PM
No the NHS is not for sale

Time will tell

arista
23-08-2019, 11:53 PM
https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/vIohCf9yCC4VAgGq7b_Q8A/https/media.fyre.co/aj9YFJFOTTqdxmTsR2Mz_i.JPG

arista
24-08-2019, 11:36 AM
D.Tusk spoke at the G7
and confirmed he does not want a "No Deal"
He also said is Boris Johnson Mr No Deal?


https://news.sky.com/story/donald-tusk-boris-johnson-will-not-want-to-go-down-in-history-as-mr-no-deal-11792723


1165229772663918592

arista
24-08-2019, 12:24 PM
President Trump is seated at a table
With French leader Macron.

Twosugars
24-08-2019, 12:31 PM
Leaving the European Union without a deal would vastly shrink the UK’s international influence and would represent “the biggest unilateral abandonment” of long-term British interests in modern history, a group of former ambassadors have claimed.

In a letter, signed by 25 former senior diplomats and published in the Times, they urged Boris Johnson to “signal a different approach” at this weekend’s G7 summit in Biarritz, France, and retain “close relationships with our European neighbours”.

It said: “An impending no-deal Brexit … would result in an unprecedented – and self-inflicted – diminution of Britain’s international influence. We need a foreign policy based on long-term UK interests and a strong economy, and that requires close relationships with our European neighbours.

“No deal represents the biggest unilateral abandonment of those interests in modern British history. It should not be allowed to happen. We hope the prime minister uses this G7 meeting to signal a different approach.”
The Guardian

arista
24-08-2019, 01:35 PM
1165249614477479939


PM Johnson arrives at the G7

arista
25-08-2019, 07:39 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ECzEjyqXUAELSAL?format=jpg&name=small




A Clip of them talking was only on SkyNewsHD
BBC only showed a still picture.

Johnson Spoke of UK Pork Pie's
that need to get into New York & Boston Ports


https://news.sky.com/story/we-will-have-very-a-big-trade-deal-with-uk-says-trump-at-g7-11793653

Nicky91
25-08-2019, 07:55 AM
Leaving the European Union without a deal would vastly shrink the UK’s international influence and would represent “the biggest unilateral abandonment” of long-term British interests in modern history, a group of former ambassadors have claimed.

In a letter, signed by 25 former senior diplomats and published in the Times, they urged Boris Johnson to “signal a different approach” at this weekend’s G7 summit in Biarritz, France, and retain “close relationships with our European neighbours”.

It said: “An impending no-deal Brexit … would result in an unprecedented – and self-inflicted – diminution of Britain’s international influence. We need a foreign policy based on long-term UK interests and a strong economy, and that requires close relationships with our European neighbours.

“No deal represents the biggest unilateral abandonment of those interests in modern British history. It should not be allowed to happen. We hope the prime minister uses this G7 meeting to signal a different approach.”
The Guardian

a no deal is what people voted for, to be cut off entirely from europe

so if that doesn't go through, it's bad for democracy in britain

arista
25-08-2019, 08:14 AM
1165528276837773313

Nicky91
25-08-2019, 08:15 AM
UK is saved, even after a no deal brexit :clap1:

The Slim Reaper
25-08-2019, 08:51 AM
UK is saved, even after a no deal brexit :clap1:

No, a deal with the US post no-deal brexit will mean they get to take complete advantage of us because of our desperation for a trade deal. It's a threat to food standards, regulations, and our NHS.

Ammi
25-08-2019, 09:07 AM
...listening to the Boris and the Donald fluffing each other’s feathers and egos...I love you...I love you more...no, I love you more...no I said it first, I love you to the Summit and back...or summit...Boris isn’t a ‘great’ anything or the ‘right man’ for anything...those are all things that are undecided yet because it’s about his country, it’s about the U.K...not about Trump...that though is Trump’s mindset...how great will this person and their country leadership be for me..?...what can YOU do for your Trump...it’s kinda laughable, only it’s not...these are two people whose personal egos come before anything else and so many important things and people’s lives are at their expense...

arista
25-08-2019, 11:39 AM
...listening to the Boris and the Donald fluffing each other’s feathers and egos...I love you...I love you more...no, I love you more...no I said it first, I love you to the Summit and back...or summit...Boris isn’t a ‘great’ anything or the ‘right man’ for anything...those are all things that are undecided yet because it’s about his country, it’s about the U.K...not about Trump...that though is Trump’s mindset...how great will this person and their country leadership be for me..?...what can YOU do for your Trump...it’s kinda laughable, only it’s not...these are two people whose personal egos come before anything else and so many important things and people’s lives are at their expense...




Yes Madame
we need to ship our Pork Pie's
to NYC ports

arista
25-08-2019, 04:14 PM
A Iranian Foreign Minister has arrived at the G7
to speak to the French Minister.

USA are unhappy
Tough Titty

bots
25-08-2019, 07:27 PM
Does anyone looking at this picture honestly think it reflects like minded people with a special relationship

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/AD83/production/_108491444_0ca6a5cd-13ae-4c07-8806-b7ddf825dbac.jpg

arista
25-08-2019, 07:35 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1165706347201122310/kxQn9U8Y?format=jpg&name=small

bots
25-08-2019, 09:41 PM
1165635187423817728

:fan:

Ammi
25-08-2019, 09:46 PM
..tbf I read that she did take his hand ..(...the vid has been cut off immediately before ..)...but it’s protocol that Melania’s hand was taken first...which I presume he would have known../been explained...so maybe he forgot...his age, ya know..:fan:..

Twosugars
25-08-2019, 10:12 PM
The Polish first lady. Good.

Beso
25-08-2019, 10:15 PM
Leaving the European Union without a deal would vastly shrink the UK’s international influence and would represent “the biggest unilateral abandonment” of long-term British interests in modern history, a group of former ambassadors have claimed.

In a letter, signed by 25 former senior diplomats and published in the Times, they urged Boris Johnson to “signal a different approach” at this weekend’s G7 summit in Biarritz, France, and retain “close relationships with our European neighbours”.

It said: “An impending no-deal Brexit … would result in an unprecedented – and self-inflicted – diminution of Britain’s international influence. We need a foreign policy based on long-term UK interests and a strong economy, and that requires close relationships with our European neighbours.

“No deal represents the biggest unilateral abandonment of those interests in modern British history. It should not be allowed to happen. We hope the prime minister uses this G7 meeting to signal a different approach.”
The Guardian



Oh how dare Boris endanger these poor mens free loading jaunts in the future.:nono:

Twosugars
25-08-2019, 10:17 PM
Oh how dare Boris endanger these poor mens free loading jaunts in the future.:nono:

They are retired from public service. The word "former" should have given you the clue

Beso
25-08-2019, 10:19 PM
They are retired from public service. The word "former" should have given you the clue

Then they know **** all...and should shut the **** up.

Twosugars
25-08-2019, 11:39 PM
Then they know **** all...and should shut the **** up.

Yeah, the people who spent their lives defending British interests abroad know nothing, but a bunch of racist far right nutters like farage know everything.
I think our exchange of views is done, for good.

Beso
26-08-2019, 06:37 AM
Yeah, the people who spent their lives defending British interests abroad know nothing, but a bunch of racist far right nutters like farage know everything.
I think our exchange of views is done, for good.

Ahhh..there is a God. .:dance:

arista
26-08-2019, 04:09 PM
Johnson PM is live all media
at the G7


Both the BBC and SkyNewsHD
asked will he call a Election
if Parliament try's to extend his date,
he refused to answer.
He still thinks he can do a deal with the EU?


https://news.sky.com/story/live-pm-begins-talks-with-four-world-leaders-as-g7-summit-nears-end-11794529


He is a over a Hour late
as Trump went on so long

Twosugars
26-08-2019, 04:39 PM
Johnson PM is live all media
at the G7


Both the BBC and SkyNewsHD
asked will he call a Election
if Parliament try's to extend his date,
he refused to answer.
He still thinks he can do a deal with the EU?



He is a over a Hour late
as Trump went on so long

But was it BBCHD? Otherwise it doesn't count

arista
27-08-2019, 01:11 AM
https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/EPBMFDFLGCoFIQp34guBDQ/https/media.fyre.co/zrr5oq4TMW3bppYCJszy_daily-telegraph-27-august_1566852619_001.png

user104658
27-08-2019, 06:50 AM
Then they know **** all...and should shut the **** up.How on earth have you managed to convince yourself that you know more about international relations than ex-diplomats who have spent years working directly in international relations? Come on Parm. I know you're angry at the forum lately but there are better ways to express it than just being contrary in a nonsensical way.

Beso
27-08-2019, 07:31 AM
How on earth have you managed to convince yourself that you know more about international relations than ex-diplomats who have spent years working directly in international relations? Come on Parm. I know you're angry at the forum lately but there are better ways to express it than just being contrary in a nonsensical way.

In a letter, signed by 25 former senior diplomats.....

former...so what the hell do they know now...probably former diplomats for a reason...useless at thier jobs at the time.


And did you really just type that someone is angry at a forum:joker:


Wtf is that:shrug:



Twosugars pointed out they were former dips....so I reiterate. ..what the **** do they know?

joeysteele
27-08-2019, 07:32 AM
I've seen nothing that convinces me that our PM is really acting in the whole Nation's interests.

We are on a very worrying and dangerous slope towards a no deal exit.
Which frankly Johnson seems, with his own self appointed hard-line Cabinet, to lead us to.

I doubt strongly that all who voted to leave, supported any notion of a no deal brexit.
The majority would have definitely.

This is a major worry and the USA likely deals has me very uncomfortable.
Anyone who believes the NHS will not be drawn into the powerful drug companies and other USA trade elements, are fooling themselves.

As for Johnson.
He has gone from his expectancy of no deal being a million to one chance, to any deal with the EU being touch and go
Then on heading home, to saying a bit more optimistic of a deal.

You cannot trust a thing he says.
What a yoke around the UKs neck has been placed on the UK, with this disaster of a PM by the Conservative membership and Party.

If I were him, I wouldn't be fooled by the opinion polls either.
Act on them at his own peril.

Beso
27-08-2019, 07:34 AM
And if they are former diplomats, where are they getting thier info from?

That sounds pretty dangerous if these former diplomats are still somehow conected, so how do they keep those connections? Could it be all the free banquets they attend or something like that??

bots
27-08-2019, 07:40 AM
And if they are former diplomats, where are they getting thier info from?

That sounds pretty dangerous if these former diplomats are still somehow conected, so how do they keep those connections? Could it be all the free banquets they attend or something like that??

many former diplomats are kept in the loop because they have history and contacts, that's how the system works. They will often know as much if not more than current diplomats

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 07:43 AM
How on earth have you managed to convince yourself that you know more about international relations than ex-diplomats who have spent years working directly in international relations? Come on Parm. I know you're angry at the forum lately but there are better ways to express it than just being contrary in a nonsensical way.

Bc people who spent their lives in a job and have decades of experience apparently know nothing :laugh:
Why Gerrard or any former player should coach? They stopped playing therefore they know nothing about football :shrug:
**** experts

Beso
27-08-2019, 07:46 AM
many former diplomats are kept in the loop because they have history and contacts, that's how the system works. They will often know as much if not more than current diplomats

There you go then.....it is all just about them being scared of losing thier free jaunts around the world, like a said before.:blush:

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 08:00 AM
many former diplomats are kept in the loop because they have history and contacts, that's how the system works. They will often know as much if not more than current diplomats

But they know nothing bots, get on message. And post brexit we all be not allowed to travel so no more "jaunts" for naughty diplomats. House arrest.:laugh: global Britain will be very local

Beso
27-08-2019, 08:19 AM
Who are the 25 arseholes anyway?...Can't seem to find that out..

Cherie
27-08-2019, 09:03 AM
Brazil likely to reject G7 offer of aid

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-49479470

Kizzy
27-08-2019, 09:31 AM
In a letter, signed by 25 former senior diplomats.....

former...so what the hell do they know now...probably former diplomats for a reason...useless at thier jobs at the time.


And did you really just type that someone is angry at a forum:joker:


Wtf is that:shrug:



Twosugars pointed out they were former dips....so I reiterate. ..what the **** do they know?

They know a lot more than bojo wants you to know at this stage in the game. These diplomats were still in position untill a few weeks ago when Boris installed his no deal goblins everywhere.

Beso
27-08-2019, 09:35 AM
They know a lot more than bojo wants you to know at this stage in the game. These diplomats were still in position untill a few weeks ago when Boris installed his no deal goblins everywhere.


Do you have a list of the 25 names Kizzy?

Kizzy
27-08-2019, 09:36 AM
And if they are former diplomats, where are they getting thier info from?

That sounds pretty dangerous if these former diplomats are still somehow conected, so how do they keep those connections? Could it be all the free banquets they attend or something like that??

Well they'll be aware of where we were in the contingency planning for no deal as of a few weeks ago... I highly doubt seeing as bojo was bumbling around Europe trying to get them to ditch the backstop and not much else that no deal planning has evolved beyond then.

Beso
27-08-2019, 09:37 AM
Well they'll be aware of where we were in the contingency planning for no deal as of a few weeks ago... I highly doubt seeing as bojo was bumbling around Europe trying to get them to ditch the backstop and not much else that no deal planning has evolved beyond then.

Do you have a list of the 25 names Kizzy?

Kizzy
27-08-2019, 09:43 AM
Do you have a list of the 25 names Kizzy?

It's in the times behind a paywall.

Beso
27-08-2019, 09:54 AM
It's in the times behind a paywall.

Didn't they print them in the paper?...have you subscribed?...can you post the names of them all if you have.

Kizzy
27-08-2019, 10:16 AM
Didn't they print them in the paper?...have you subscribed?...can you post the names of them all if you have.

Do I sound like the sort of person who subscribes to the times?...

Beso
27-08-2019, 10:48 AM
Do I sound like the sort of person who subscribes to the times?...

I dunno..neve rthought much about it really....but no names...no story to check so atm everyone's opinion on the matter counts as much as the next persons.

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 11:01 AM
I dunno..neve rthought much about it really....but no names...no story to check so atm everyone's opinion on the matter counts as much as the next persons.

C'mon, parm; let's say Kizzy was a times subscriber because she loves the Murdoch press so much, and she also provided you with a list of the 25 names, then what?

Beso
27-08-2019, 11:04 AM
C'mon, parm; let's say Kizzy was a times subscriber because she loves the Murdoch press so much, and she also provided you with a list of the 25 names, then what?

Then I can spend the day researching the names, finding out about every individual...then I can decide if i was right or wrong..atm...Im right in my own head.

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 11:19 AM
Then I can spend the day researching the names, finding out about every individual...then I can decide if i was right or wrong..atm...Im right in my own head.

So why do you need to research the names? Do you believe they all got together to tell lies, or that they genuinely believe they are trying to warn the country out of a sense of right or wrong.

We all know what you'll do:

Well Joe Bloggs once shared a cab with Blair, so he can't be trusted.

That Joan Bloggs once passed Gordon Brown in a corridor, so she can't be trusted.

John Doe - he marched against brexit so he's biased.

Jane Doe once wrote an article at university decrying the bullingdon club culture, so she's anti Boris.

Let me phrase things another way, what person could come forward to warn you about what was happening that would a) instantly have your trust about what they are saying? B) What would they have to say, in order to prove that you'd been lied to and duped?

Beso
27-08-2019, 12:39 PM
No names yet then.

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 12:43 PM
No names yet then.

Signatories include Lord John Kerr, the author of Article 50; Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the former permanent representative to the European Union and ambassador to the United States of America; Lord David Hannay, permanent representative to the EEC under Margaret Thatcher's government; Peter Jenkins, former UK representative to the World Trade Organisation; Dame Mariot Leslie, former permanent representative of the United Kingdom to NATO; Sir David Warren, former ambassador to Japan; and Sir Roderic Lyne, former Ambassador to the Russian Federation.

Here are 7. I'll get the rest. Any chance I can get an answer to the 2 questions I posed?

Sir Nigel Sheinwald, Permanent Representative to the European Union 2000 -2003 and Ambassador to the United States 2007 – 2012;

Lord Kerr of Kinlochard, Permanent Representative to the European Economic Community/European Union 1990 – 1995 and Ambassador to the United States 1995 – 1997;

Lord Hannay of Chiswick, Permanent Representative to the European Economic Community 1985 – 1990 and Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York 1990 – 1995;

Sir John Grant, Permanent Representative to the European Union 2003 -2007;

Dame Mariot Leslie, Permanent Representative to NATO 2010-2014 and Ambassador to Norway 2002-2006;

Sir David Warren, Ambassador to Japan 2008 – 2012;

Peter Jenkins, UK representative to the World Trade Organisation 1996-2001 and to the International Atomic Energy Agency 2001-2006;

Michael W. Atkinson, Ambassador to Romania 1989-1992;

Ian Bond, Ambassador to Latvia 2005 – 2007;

Dame Nicola Brewer, High Commissioner to South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland 2009-13;

David Broucher, Ambassador to the Czech Republic 1997 – 2001;

John Buck, Ambassador to Portugal, 2004-2007;

Eric Callway, HM Consul-General Frankfurt, 1997-2001;

Dr Peter Collecott, Ambassador to Brazil 2004 – 2008;

Basil Eastwood, Ambassador to Syria 1996-2000 and Ambassador to Switzerland 2001-2004;

Sir Stephen Gomersall, Ambassador to Japan 1999–2004;

Michael Hall, Deputy UK Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe 1998-2002;

Sir Roderic Lyne, UK Ambassador to Russia 2000 – 2004;

Sir David Madden, High Commissioner to Cyprus 1994-99 and Ambassador to Greece 1999-2004;

Oliver Miles, Ambassador to Greece 1993 – 1996;

Colin A Munro, Ambassador to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe 2003-2007;

Stephen Nash, Ambassador to Latvia 1999 – 2002;

Sir John Ramsden, Ambassador to Croatia 2004–2008;

Nigel Thorpe, Ambassador to Hungary 1998 – 2003;

James Watt, Ambassador to Lebanon 2003–06, Ambassador to Jordan 2006–11, and Ambassador to Egypt 2011-2014.

Beso
27-08-2019, 12:47 PM
Thanks....best way I can answer it is a person who perhaps hadn't been lied to by the people they were talking to get the information.....which is why I needed the names to research thier character best I could and who they have been speaking to to get the info....


One more thing...unless you take back and apologise for saying I find that young boy sexy I won't ever respond to your questions again.

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 01:04 PM
Thanks....best way I can answer it is a person who perhaps hadn't been lied to by the people they were talking to get the information.....which is why I needed the names to research thier character best I could and who they have been speaking to to get the info....


One more thing...unless you take back and apologise for saying I find that young boy sexy I won't ever respond to your questions again.

They worked as ambassadors, one even for Thatcher, so I'd guess they wouldn't be using specific news sources like normal people, to get their news.

https://66.media.tumblr.com/c1d7e7d9e608deb13f84c21e3f61d28b/tumblr_miah34fTRq1qgpyloo2_r1_250.gif

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:07 PM
They worked as ambassadors, one even for Thatcher, so I'd guess they wouldn't be using specific news sources like normal people, to get their news.

https://66.media.tumblr.com/c1d7e7d9e608deb13f84c21e3f61d28b/tumblr_miah34fTRq1qgpyloo2_r1_250.gif

Aye..am no ****ing stupid...


But the people they talk to have a lot to lose as well on brexit so it's daft not to think they could have been lied to .

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:11 PM
I mean..come on folks, wake up..here's one ex ambassador.


https://amp.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jul/21/prince-andrew-quit-trade-ambassador

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 01:14 PM
Aye..am no ****ing stupid...


But the people they talk to have a lot to lose as well on brexit so it's daft not to think they could have been lied to .

You're so consumed with the belief that you feel people are only doing this because it might stops a few parties for them (one of those people hasn't been in these circles for nearly 20 years), but you can't even see the people that provably lied to the nation, are the people with the most to gain by brexit - especially a no-deal. JRM for example, his company is hiding it's accounts in the caymans to avoid paying tax on over £100m, he begged a government grant of just under £7m to renovate his ancestral home at the same time he was voting for a bedroom tax on poor people.

Eu are in the process of legislating tax haven profits back into taxable contributions, but yet you honestly believe, rich folks missing out on the odd jolly (when they can afford them anyway) makes them more corruptible than rich guys trying to avoid paying any tax.

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 01:15 PM
So why do you need to research the names? Do you believe they all got together to tell lies, or that they genuinely believe they are trying to warn the country out of a sense of right or wrong.

We all know what you'll do:

Well Joe Bloggs once shared a cab with Blair, so he can't be trusted.

That Joan Bloggs once passed Gordon Brown in a corridor, so she can't be trusted.

John Doe - he marched against brexit so he's biased.

Jane Doe once wrote an article at university decrying the bullingdon club culture, so she's anti Boris.

Let me phrase things another way, what person could come forward to warn you about what was happening that would a) instantly have your trust about what they are saying? B) What would they have to say, in order to prove that you'd been lied to and duped?

If only the same energy was spent on researching the cons who led people to vote for brexit :laugh:
Pathetic state of affairs. Some people will swallow anything if it agrees with their own prejudices.

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:17 PM
What prejudices do these people have Twosugars?


Slim...lol..

Stop personally attacking me in a different name.

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 01:21 PM
Has anybody said anything? No? Good.

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 01:21 PM
What prejudices do these people have Twosugars?


Slim...lol..

Stop personally attacking me in a different name.

Genuinely have no idea what you're on about. If you genuinely believe me to be a multi, ask Cherie (who I know you trust) about that.

I didn't attack you (again). I pointed you towards facts, and you believe them to be a personal attack. Pretty much sums up how we've ended up where we are.

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 01:24 PM
Japan went on record several times, TSR, saying bluntly that brexit is not in our interests

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:24 PM
Genuinely have no idea what you're on about. If you genuinely believe me to be a multi, ask Cherie (who I know you trust) about that.

I didn't attack you (again). I pointed you towards facts, and you believe them to be a personal attack. Pretty much sums up how we've ended up where we are.

Ok I take that back..paranoia maybe..


But you started your post saying I'm so consumed....Im not consumed by anything you described..

Jrm..yeah probably....same everywhere in my opinion...boh sides just full of corrupt wankers..that I simply have no time for..sure there will be good..but are the good, don't tell me the good don't know what's going on with the bad...but they turn a blind eye..so in my opinion are just as bad...these ambassadors...the prince Andrew types.....BY FAR THE WORST.

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 01:32 PM
Imagine thinking ambassadors are like royalty
They are professional diplomats who studied and worked hard in their profession.
It's not america where trump rewards his mates with posts abroad. We have professional diplomatic corps. God knows why they bother. Like judges they will be called enemies of the people.
With trump and brexit it is to hell with experts and let the ignorant have a go.

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:34 PM
Yet Andrew was made an ambassador..who allowed that...

Who allowed the rest?

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 01:36 PM
Ok I take that back..paranoia maybe..


But you started your post saying I'm so consumed....Im not consumed by anything you described..

Jrm..yeah probably....same everywhere in my opinion...boh sides just full of corrupt wankers..that I simply have no time for..sure there will be good..but are the good, don't tell me the good don't know what's going on with the bad...but they turn a blind eye..so in my opinion are just as bad...these ambassadors...the prince Andrew types.....BY FAR THE WORST.

Because I was reacting to your post where you flat out suggested that these ambassadors are doing it to avoid missing out on the odd soiree. Ambassadors are pretty much always from the Eaton set. No one goes into those jobs from conducting on busses.

All of your scepticism is purely on the side of remain though, so whilst I agree there is corruption on all sides, you're accepting it from one side but openly searching for it from the other. To me, those things don't add up. We know now that the leave side broke laws, and continue to lie to this very day.

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 01:40 PM
Yet Andrew was made an ambassador..who allowed that...

Who allowed the rest?

You are confusing things
Geri Halliwell was named an ambassador too :laugh:

They compare to real ambassadors as much as Mary Portas, the tsar of high street shopping, compared to the real Russian tsars :laugh:

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:41 PM
Because I was reacting to your post where you flat out suggested that these ambassadors are doing it to avoid missing out on the odd soiree. Ambassadors are pretty much always from the Eaton set. No one goes into those jobs from conducting on busses.

All of your scepticism is purely on the side of remain though, so whilst I agree there is corruption on all sides, you're accepting it from one side but openly searching for it from the other. To me, those things don't add up. We know now that the leave side broke laws, and continue to lie to this very day.

True..but that is how I feel until I do the research of the 25 names you so kindly provided me.

I have neatly written them down on my moleskin notepad and shall research each one at my leisure to see if my own mind can be changed by my own research...but at this time..I have them all down as the prince Andrew type..all weaklings, and all definitely unsuitable to be carrying Britain's name abroad due to there penchant for having a lot of baggage to carry.

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:41 PM
You are confusing things
Geri Halliwell was named an ambassador too :laugh:

They compare to real ambassadors as much as Mary Portas, the tsar of high street shopping, compared to the real Russian tsars :laugh:

Was she named an ambassador to a country...no she wasn't.

The Slim Reaper
27-08-2019, 01:47 PM
True..but that is how I feel until I do the research of the 25 names you so kindly provided me.

I have neatly written them down on my moleskin notepad and shall research each one at my leisure to see if my own mind can be changed by my own research...but at this time..I have them all down as the prince Andrew type..all weaklings, and all definitely unsuitable to be carrying Britain's name abroad due to there penchant for having a lot of baggage to carry.

"True, but... " is the most brexity of all the brexity things to say. Good luck with your research. I already know your findings.

Beso
27-08-2019, 01:50 PM
"True, but... " is the most brexity of all the brexity things to say. Good luck with your research. I already know your findings.

So do I...

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 03:13 PM
Was she named an ambassador to a country...no she wasn't.

Was prince Andrew named ambassador to a country? :facepalm:

Beso
27-08-2019, 04:52 PM
Was prince Andrew named ambassador to a country? :facepalm:

No...he wasn't. .:joker:

I thought I read that.. took a while to point that out though:hehe:

Twosugars
27-08-2019, 05:02 PM
No...he wasn't. .:joker:

I thought I read that.. took a while to point that out though:hehe:

Bc I have a life.

Took you a while to realize your comparison of professional ambassadors to prince Andrew was stupid huh

Leave you to it

Beso
27-08-2019, 05:05 PM
Bc I have a life.

Took you a while to realize your comparison of professional ambassadors to prince Andrew was stupid huh

Leave you to it

Please stick to your word this time.x