high court megan markle¬

[Crimson Dynamo]

High court megan markle

[arista]

Yes it's Front Page no less.

[arista]

Posting again
for yet another thread on the Poxy Royals

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/11379/production/_110512507_thesunfrontpage15.01.20.jpg

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/05F1/production/_110512510_dailytelegraph15jan.jpg

[Niamh.]

What a great dad

[Liam-]

A wonderful father, definitely Meghan’s fault though

[Amy Jade]

No wonder she wants nothing to do with him.

[Denver]

What a great dad

A wonderful father, definitely Meghan’s fault though

No wonder she wants nothing to do with him.

I mean she was the one behind the smear campaign if him.

She has never been a nice person even before Harry made her relevant

[Liam-]

He literally sold stories about her and collided with the press to release details about their relationship and the wedding, him and her sister have been out for clout and money from the get go

[Denver]

She milked the brit taxpayers of their money then decided she wanted out after Kate stood up to her bullying ways

[Nicky91]

I mean she was the one behind the smear campaign if him.

She has never been a nice person even before Harry made her relevant

because Harry is a saint in all this :idc:


we all knew Harry as the whole rebel of the family, but yet now he seems to get treated by GBP like some sweet innocent angel

[Denver]

because Harry is a saint in all this :idc:


we all knew Harry as the whole rebel of the family, but yet now he seems to get treated by GBP like some sweet innocent angel

I never liked Harry, he got away with being a qunt because people fancied him

[Niamh.]

I mean she was the one behind the smear campaign if him.

She has never been a nice person even before Harry made her relevant

How dare you! Rachel Zane has always been relevant :nono:

https://media3.giphy.com/media/ToMjGpuWcPo1Z8OR8vC/giphy.gif

[arista]

She milked the brit taxpayers of their money then decided she wanted out after Kate stood up to her bullying ways



Yes Its a Bloody Outrage.

Its all Meghan
pissing everything UP

[arista]

I mean she was the one behind the smear campaign if him.

She has never been a nice person even before Harry made her relevant

Bang On Right WSM

[Twosugars]

The thread made on the basis what one side in the court case say.
A new low, Daily Hail accused in the case quoted as basis for discussion

[Tom4784]

Yeah, the hatred against Meghan is totally not a race driven thing but let's believe someone who sold stories about his own daughter, he's white after all.

[Denver]

Yeah, the hatred against Meghan is totally not a race driven thing but let's believe someone who sold stories about his own daughter, he's white after all.

Not everything has to be about race

[arista]

Not everything has to be about race


Valid Point.

[Liam-]

Not everything has to be about race

Correct, but when it is, it is

[Mitchell]

Yeah, the hatred against Meghan is totally not a race driven thing but let's believe someone who sold stories about his own daughter, he's white after all.

Tea

[Marsh.]

Useless dad suddenly wants a slice of the pie now his daughter is rich and famous shocker.

[Marsh.]

er no, Meghan took this action out against Associated Newspapers, as part of their defence tey will call Megan's father to testify. he gets nowt from this

Yes, this is the first time the poor man has spoken out.

Never sold a story on her has he. Oh wait...

[bots]

So many entrenched views when no-one knows the facts

It's getting exceedingly boring with racist being thrown around on every thread

[Denver]

So many entrenched views when no-one knows the facts

It's getting exceedingly boring with racist being thrown around on every thread

Its an excuse people use when their fave is disliked

[Liam-]

‘Their fave’? It’s not a reality show :facepalm:

I’m not really a big fan of any of the royals, but there’s no denying the racial undertones of the abuse and treatment she receives, whether it be from the public, or the media, not everyone is racist obviously, despite what the likes of Piers, Schofield and Holmes likes to say is being thrown around, but there is a big portion of the treatment of Meghan which does stem from racism, in my opinion

[Denver]

Meghan has done herself no favours with the British public and has made herself look like a gold digger

[Nicky91]

Meghan has done herself no favours with the British public and has made herself look like a gold digger

and the ongoing painting Meghan like a villain continues :idc:

poor girl can't do any good from the first moment she got married to Harry

[Denver]

She shouldnt have taken tens of millions of taxpayers money then wanted out soon as the funds dried up :idc:

[Kazanne]

How do people KNOW he was a bad dad ? they are just going off what the awful press/media relays to them and because they like Megan are automatically believing her, no one knows, so it's unfair to brand him a terrible dad, no one knows what goes on behind closed doors, if he is called upon to testify,surely he has to do that,its been reported on TV today just after his heart attack HARRY contacted him giving him an earful,is this true ? we don't know,I suppose it depends who you like. I ay just let them get on with it,this is just feeding more media frenzy.

[Liam-]

How do people KNOW he was a bad dad ? they are just going off what the awful press/media relays to them and because they like Megan are automatically believing her, no one knows, so it's unfair to brand him a terrible dad, no one knows what goes on behind closed doors, if he is called upon to testify,surely he has to do that,its been reported on TV today just after his heart attack HARRY contacted him giving him an earful,is this true ? we don't know,I suppose it depends who you like. I ay just let them get on with it,this is just feeding more media frenzy.

Have the same energy when people are calling Meghan awful things because of the things they see in the press

[Liam-]

Meghan has done herself no favours with the British public and has made herself look like a gold digger

A gold digger worth millions in her own right? K

[jet]

She was full of praise on her Tig site for her father before she met Harry, excerpts were released - how he worked hard to pay to send her to the best schools and university in LA. How he was the greatest father in the world blah blah. Then she blatantly lies when giving a college speech about she knows how hard it is to put yourself through colllege, she knew what is was like, all the jobs she had to take etc etc. Lying in full view, and not caring....

Imagine not even taking the time to introduce her future husband to her father.

[Tom4784]

She was full of praise on her Tig site for her father before she met Harry, excerpts were released - how he worked hard to pay to send her to the best schools and university in LA. How he was the greatest father in the world blah blah. Then she blatantly lies when giving a college speech about she knows how hard it is to put yourself through colllege, she knew what is was like, all the jobs she had to take etc etc. Lying in full view, and not caring....

Imagine not even taking the time to introduce her future husband to her father.

When you have a difficult relationship with your parents, you can and will lie to other people about it because it's easier than unloading the truth on people. You want to paint a happier picture because you want it to be true.

If she did slate him, you and everyone else would use it against her. She cannot win either way.

[Jordan.]

Meghan has done herself no favours with the British public and has made herself look like a gold digger

Nope she's done herself no favours with royalists and racist (like she had a chance anyway) I can't imagine the average person actually cares how she and Harry want to live their lifes. Also her wedding made far more money than it cost before you continue the scrounger route.

[jet]

The poor man was left to cope on his own after the romance hit the headlines with dozens of press camped outside his door and following him around taking unflattering pics of him looking dishevelled and buying some beers.
Then his other daughter sets it up that they get a few pics of him in a more controlled and flattering light and BOOM, Meghan and Harry come down on him like a ton of bricks and Harry apparently read him the riot act.
That was when it all started to go wrong. He should have been shown the respect of being introduced to Harry and given protection from the press. He was given no advice or direction at all.

[Kazanne]

Have the same energy when people are calling Meghan awful things because of the things they see in the press

When have I ever said I don't like Megan ? It doesn't mean people don't like her because other things are reported. I just see both sides

[jet]

When you have a difficult relationship with your parents, you can and will lie to other people about it because it's easier than unloading the truth on people. You want to paint a happier picture because you want it to be true.

If she did slate him, you and everyone else would use it against her. She cannot win either way.

Thats a terribly weak excuse. Its well known that he gave her everything and adored her. Google it. She said so, her friends said so before she decided to ruthlessly cut him out of her life.

[Tom4784]

The poor man was left to cope on his own after the romance hit the headlines with dozens of press camped outside his door and following him around taking unflattering pics of him looking dishevelled and buying some beers.
Then his other daughter sets it up that they get a few pics of him in a more controlled and flattering light and BOOM, Meghan and Harry come down on him like a ton of bricks and Harry apparently read him the riot act.
That was when it all started to go wrong. He should have been shown the respect of being introduced to Harry and given protection from the press. He was given no advice or direction at all.

The 'poor' man invited the paparazzi to snap pictures of him getting a suit fitted for a wedding he wasn't invited to because he wanted to make a quick buck.

He courted the press just like Samantha Markle did.

Meghan's dad wasn't in her life by all accounts, they were estranged so why should Meghan introduce Harry to someone she had cut ties with? Judging from how her father has acted, it was for good reason.

[Marsh.]

Meghan has done herself no favours with the British public and has made herself look like a gold digger

Yes... that gold digger... stepping away from the Royal family and all that comes with it. Instead choosing to go independent. Bloody gold digger.

[Marsh.]

She shouldnt have taken tens of millions of taxpayers money then wanted out soon as the funds dried up :idc:

Which funds dried up?

[jet]

Meghan has done herself no favours with the British public and has made herself look like a gold digger

She is a gold digger...she wants to keep the income from the Duchy of Cornwall without doing the boring work for the income. No cutting ribbons and
visiting hospitals and chatting to old dignitaries for her.
She is seeing dollar signs in their hundreds of millions trading off their royal status in N. America with commerical ventures and getting millions for attending galas and making speeches. Consorting with the likes of Oprah and the Clooneys who wouldn't have looked twice at her as a B list actress.
I doubt she ever intended to stay in the UK when she married Harry in the first place, by all accounts Miss Diva is mega ambitious. He was her entry into where she wanted to get to - and he has tagged along.
I hope the Palace curb her greed.

[Elliot]

She is a gold digger...she wants to keep the income from the Duchy of Cornwall without doing the boring work for the income. No cutting ribbons and
visiting hospitals and chatting to old dignitaries for her.
She is seeing dollar signs in their hundreds of millions trading off their royal status in N. America with commerical ventures and getting millions for attending galas and making speeches. Consorting with the likes of Oprah and the Clooneys who wouldn't have looked twice at her as a B list actress.
I doubt she ever intended to stay in the UK when she married Harry in the first place, by all accounts Miss Diva is mega ambitious. He was her entry into where she wanted to get to - and he has tagged along.
I hope the Palace curb her greed.

We love conspiracy theorists

[Marsh.]

She is a gold digger...she wants to keep the income from the Duchy of Cornwall without doing the boring work for the income. No cutting ribbons and
visiting hospitals and chatting to old dignitaries for her.
She is seeing dollar signs in their hundreds of millions trading off their royal status in N. America with commerical ventures and getting millions for attending galas and making speeches. Consorting with the likes of Oprah and the Clooneys who wouldn't have looked twice at her as a B list actress.
I doubt she ever intended to stay in the UK when she married Harry in the first place, by all accounts Miss Diva is mega ambitious. He was her entry into where she wanted to get to - and he has tagged along.
I hope the Palace curb her greed.

Wow, someone loves reading tabloids in depth research.

[Twosugars]

She is a gold digger...she wants to keep the income from the Duchy of Cornwall without doing the boring work for the income. No cutting ribbons and
visiting hospitals and chatting to old dignitaries for her.
She is seeing dollar signs in their hundreds of millions trading off their royal status in N. America with commerical ventures and getting millions for attending galas and making speeches. Consorting with the likes of Oprah and the Clooneys who wouldn't have looked twice at her as a B list actress.
I doubt she ever intended to stay in the UK when she married Harry in the first place, by all accounts Miss Diva is mega ambitious. He was her entry into where she wanted to get to - and he has tagged along.
I hope the Palace curb her greed.

:laugh::laugh:

So much for your claims of deep research.

[James]

Posts deleted. No more insulting members.

[jet]

Wow, someone loves reading tabloids in depth research.

Nah, its partly my own opinion and partly what I read in their lengthy Sussexroyal 'leaving' statement...have a read at it yourself, its rather eye opening...

[The Slim Reaper]

She is a gold digger...she wants to keep the income from the Duchy of Cornwall without doing the boring work for the income. No cutting ribbons and
visiting hospitals and chatting to old dignitaries for her.
She is seeing dollar signs in their hundreds of millions trading off their royal status in N. America with commerical ventures and getting millions for attending galas and making speeches. Consorting with the likes of Oprah and the Clooneys who wouldn't have looked twice at her as a B list actress.
I doubt she ever intended to stay in the UK when she married Harry in the first place, by all accounts Miss Diva is mega ambitious. He was her entry into where she wanted to get to - and he has tagged along.
I hope the Palace curb her greed.

She's been consorting with Oprah and the Clooneys?

My god, get me the Boris on line one.

https://i.gifer.com/3HeH.gif

[jet]

:laugh::laugh:

So much for your claims of deep research.

There is research for facts and there is opinion. Do you know the difference?

[Marsh.]

Nah, its partly my own opinion and partly what I read in their lengthy Sussexroyal 'leaving' statement...have a read at it yourself, its rather eye opening...

Of course you did.

[Twosugars]

There is research for facts and there is opinion. Do you know the difference?

I doubt you do.
You posted an unsubstantiated rant against her claiming to know her motivations, her plans past, present and future. That's not research, that's making things up

[jet]

She's been consorting with Oprah and the Clooneys?

My god, get me the Boris on line one.

https://i.gifer.com/3HeH.gifE

....and the Obama's, Elton John and the Beckhams. That's the life she's dreamed of, not stuffy old Palaces and ribbon cutting. She's cut and run as soon as she could, keeping her prince, her title and royal income.
Harry will be back home in a year, that's not the life he would want.
Now - this is my OPINION once again, got it? :hee:

[jet]

I doubt you do.
You posted an unsubstantiated rant against her claiming to know her motivations, her plans past, present and future. That's not research, that's making things up

Right, so you don't know the difference between a post stating researched facts and a post giving an opinion.
Not my problem.

[Marsh.]

E

....and the Obama's, Elton John and the Beckhams. That's the life she's dreamed of, not stuffy old Palaces and ribbon cutting. She's cut and run as soon as she could, keeping her prince, her title and royal income.
Harry will be back home in a year, that's not the life he would want.
Now - this is my OPINION once again, got it? :hee:

And we're entitled to say that opinion is based on nothing but lies and nonsense.

[Twosugars]

Right, so you don't know the difference between a post stating researched facts and a post giving an opinion.
Not my problem.

Anything to back it up?

[Kazanne]

Well it seems not all the US press will leave them alone
https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-cut-off-close-friends-during-meghan-markles-pregnancy-theres-a-lot-of-resentment/?utm_medium=browser&utm_source=people.com&utm_content=20200115&utm_campaign=473966

[Elliot]

Right, so you don't know the difference between a post stating researched facts and a post giving an opinion.
Not my problem.

‘Researched facts’ sksjksjsksjsksjsksjsksj

[The Slim Reaper]

E

....and the Obama's, Elton John and the Beckhams. That's the life she's dreamed of, not stuffy old Palaces and ribbon cutting. She's cut and run as soon as she could, keeping her prince, her title and royal income.
Harry will be back home in a year, that's not the life he would want.
Now - this is my OPINION once again, got it? :hee:

The Obamas just chill and do charity work, the beckhams do pretty much nothing these days, and Elton John tours his music, so assuming you're correct, what exactly are they aspiring to be/do?

If they already have £400m as has been mentioned, then they're richer than all of them already.

[jet]

And we're entitled to say that opinion is based on nothing but lies and nonsense.

Of course you are. Just as I'm entitled to think you are ill - informed and spend your time defending a mega rich, self entitled diva, who can't keep key staff (4 resigned in a year) and is on her 3rd nanny, but knock yourself out. :laugh:

[Nicky91]

Of course you are. Just as I'm entitled to think you are ill - informed and spend your time defending a mega rich, self entitled diva, who can't keep key staff (4 resigned in a year) and is on her 3rd nanny, but knock yourself out. :laugh:

Meghan isn't perfect, no one is perfect, makes us human


i personally am not too keen on Kate, or the whole middleton family but that's my own opinion

[The Slim Reaper]

Of course you are. Just as I'm entitled to think you are ill - informed and spend your time defending a mega rich, self entitled diva, who can't keep key staff (4 resigned in a year) and is on her 3rd nanny, but knock yourself out. :laugh:

Hiding insults behind hyphens still makes them insults.

[jet]

The Obamas just chill and do charity work, the beckhams do pretty much nothing these days, and Elton John tours his music, so assuming you're correct, what exactly are they aspiring to be/do?

If they already have £400m as has been mentioned, then they're richer than all of them already.

Megs is worth £4 million and they don't have £400m, which tabloid did you read that in? :laugh:
They need contacts and proper introductions in the States to further their commerical ambitions.

[The Slim Reaper]

Megs is worth £4 million and they don't have £400m, which tabloid did you read that in? :laugh:
They need contacts and proper introductions in the States to further their commerical ambitions.

Yeah, the royal family needs introductions in America in order for them to reach their unknown/unlabelled/untitled ambitions. I saw that figure mentioned; I have no idea what they are worth, and nor do I care.

[Marsh.]

Of course you are. Just as I'm entitled to think you are ill - informed and spend your time defending a mega rich, self entitled diva, who can't keep key staff (4 resigned in a year) and is on her 3rd nanny, but knock yourself out. :laugh:

Posts like this make you sound jealous of her. Bless.

[Marsh.]

Megs is worth £4 million and they don't have £400m, which tabloid did you read that in? :laugh:
They need contacts and proper introductions in the States to further their commerical ambitions.

They have a private fortune of 34m, they won't be needing the States to fund them.

[Twosugars]

Megs is worth £4 million and they don't have £400m, which tabloid did you read that in? :laugh:
They need contacts and proper introductions in the States to further their commerical ambitions.

Lol.
World-famous and they need contacts and introductions? :laugh3:

Now you've lost the plot I'm afraid :hehe:

[bots]

Lol.
World-famous and they need contacts and introductions? :laugh3:

Now you've lost the plot I'm afraid :hehe:

Andrew is a prince and he needed Epstein to provide "introductions"

[jet]

Financial Times
https://www.ft.com/content/09096336-32f9-11ea-9703-eea0cae3f0de


Drawing inspiration from the Obamas, the Clintons and the commercial savvy of Gwyneth Paltrow, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle this week embarked on a fraught attempt to transform their philanthropic royal brand into a lucrative private business.....

......To find their way the Sussexes are instead looking further afield to the ranks of ex-presidents, prime ministers and Hollywood stars who have turned personal brands — and championing good causes — into formidable income streams.....

......The post-presidency success of Barack and Michelle Obama is one obvious model. Their political afterlife has included a $65m joint book deal with Penguin Random House, and an agreement with Netflix to produce films, worth tens of millions of dollars. Like Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, Mr Obama and his wife are able to charge hundreds of thousands of dollars for speaking appearances.

While on a smaller scale, the pulling power of the Sussexes is likely to be prized by publishers, the television industry and speaking agents. The Duke’s recent deal to make a film series on mental health with Oprah Winfrey and Apple TV is a possible template for other projects.

More controversial will be any moves to extend the Sussex brand to a lifestyle portal that offers a gateway to promoted products or corporate sponsors. One former courtier likened the idea to “a posh, royal version of Goop”, the lifestyle website of the actress Gwyneth Paltrow.

......The groundwork for commercial enterprise has already been laid to some extent. With the announcement of their separate foundation in June, the couple filed trademark applications on “Sussex Royal”. It covered everything from branding “pyjamas, suits, and hooded tops” to “advisory and consultancy services” and “health and wellness training”.

[Kizzy]

Andrew is a prince and he needed Epstein to provide "introductions"

Lol that's not the best example if the onus is on the royals being infallible :laugh:

[Liam-]

Charles and Camila and William and Kate have both secured their own brands to make money from who they are, why are Harry and Megs the only ones being called out on it? The pure bias against this couple is astounding and disgusting

[Twosugars]

Andrew is a prince and he needed Epstein to provide "introductions"

I dont think they plan to join the exclusive paedo ring so introductions wont be necessary

[Twosugars]

Charles and Camila and William and Kate have both secured their own brands to make money from who they are, why are Harry and Megs the only ones being called out on it? The pure bias against this couple is astounding and disgusting

I know. Charles's been flogging his biscuits and **** for ages
But not Meghan :laugh:

[bots]

I know. Charles's been flogging his biscuits and **** for ages
But not Meghan :laugh:

Harry's ginger snaps could be a gold mine :think:

[jet]

Charles and Camila and William and Kate have both secured their own brands to make money from who they are, why are Harry and Megs the only ones being called out on it? The pure bias against this couple is astounding and disgusting

Charles and Camila's 'own brand' is the inherited Duchy of Cornwall, which pays for the Royal's working income, eg, Harry is paid nearly 3 million a year - which the Sussex's want to keep, even though they are leaving...
William and Kate's 'brand' raises millions for their charitable causes only. If you know they are making money for themselves with commerical ventures, give details please....

[jet]

The problem is that the Sussexes seem to expect to make a fortune trading off their Royal status, which Royals have never been allowed to do.
Look what happened when Fergie tried it, she was blasted, and she wasn't even a royal anymore, only a divorced one.

[Marsh.]

The problem is that the Sussexes seem to expect to make a fortune trading off their Royal status, which Royals have never been allowed to do.
Look what happened when Fergie tried it, she was blasted, and she wasn't even a royal anymore, only a divorced one.

Well you've just answered your own question, Fergie is not a Royal... Harry and Meghan are.

The problem is you thinking you can read their minds.

[jet]

Posts like this make you sound jealous of her. Bless.

When you don't want to acknowledge something, play the 'jealous' card.
Old hat.

[jet]

Well you've just answered your own question, Fergie is not a Royal... Harry and Meghan are.

The problem is you thinking you can read their minds.

What am I reading their minds about?

[Marsh.]

When you don't want to acknowledge something, play the 'jealous' card.
Old hat.

When you don't want to see what's infront of your eyes, make stuff up and call it "research".
Old jet.

[Zizu]

They have a private fortune of 34m, they won't be needing the States to fund them.



That’s also my stance .

I do love Harry though and MM is gorgeous so it’s all good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

When you don't want to see what's infront of your eyes, make stuff up and call it "research".
Old jet.

When you don't want to be bothered to inform yourself, insult people who make the effort and base their opinions on that effort. You seldom post beyond a few baity sentences.
When have you even posted an article to back your opinions? When I do, its ignored and the sneering goes on.

[Marsh.]

When you don't want to be bothered to inform yourself, insult people who make the effort and base their opinions on that effort. You seldom post beyond a few baity sentences.
When have you even posted an article to back your opinions? When I do, its ignored and the sneering goes on.

You seem to be under the illusion that you don't insult.
You're also deluded if you think any link you may have posted holds any facts pertaining to the guff you're posting in this thread.

You're wrong on both counts.

[Marsh.]

That’s also my stance .

I do love Harry though and MM is gorgeous so it’s all good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Quite right, Zizu.

[jet]

You seem to be under the illusion that you don't insult.
You're also deluded if you think any link you may have posted holds any facts pertaining to the guff you're posting in this thread.

You're wrong on both counts.

Bait, and you'll get it back. It's your speciality, certainly trying to inform yourself isn't.

[Marsh.]

Bait, and you'll get it back. It's your speciality, certainly trying to inform yourself isn't.

All my posts have pertained to your comments in this thread about the thread topic.

Yours appear to be becoming more about me.

Speaks volumes about the weak foundations of your argument.

[jet]

All my posts have pertained to your comments in this thread about the thread topic.

Yours appear to be becoming more about me.

Speaks volumes about the weak foundations of your argument.

Your posts consist of calling my opinions guff and made up, you ignored an article backing up my conclusions. I responded by saying your posts are baity and lacking in any substance.
At least I attempt a reasoned argument, when do you?

[Beso]

Posts deleted. No more insulting members.

Hi james....can you pm me the deleted posts please.

[jet]

Meghan didn't mind when her friends published cherry picked excerpts of the private letter that made her look good and her father bad. Did she take the magazine to court then - no.
When her father published the letter to put it straight he's vilified and the paper is getting sued. :rolleyes:

[Marsh.]

Your posts consist of calling my opinions guff and made up, you ignored an article backing up my conclusions. I responded by saying your posts are baity and lacking in any substance.
At least I attempt a reasoned argument, when do you?

They are made up as the article was nothing more than the assumptions of a journalist.

You seem to mistake those for factual evidence.

[Glenn.]

Queen Meghan sure has made an impression

[jet]

They are made up as the article was nothing more than the assumptions of a journalist.

You seem to mistake those for factual evidence.

Not evidence, but reasoned conclusions based on the long statement the Sussexes made about leaving and wanting financial independence. Have you read it yet?
At least the journalist, and others who drew the same conclusions, are in a position to make 'assumptions', having made the effort to do some groundwork.
If I post something you think is guff, look it up and provide a link to back up your disbelief, post a refuting article or at least state reasons why you think so, otherwise its just meaningless baiting.

[Glenn.]

An assumption isn’t fact though

[Marsh.]

Not evidence, but reasoned conclusions based on the long statement the Sussexes made about leaving and wanting financial independence. Have you read it yet?
At least the journalist, and others who drew the same conclusions, are in a position to make 'assumptions', having made the effort to do some groundwork.
If I post something you think is guff, look it up and provide a link to back up your disbelief, post a refuting article or at least state reasons why you think so, otherwise its just meaningless baiting.

It's baiting to point out your use of the word "fact" is wildly incorrect? Ok jet.

Listening to biased journalism is not "groundwork" and does not elevate what amounts to nothing more than malicious gossip to anything more than what it is.

I don't really need to backup my post that the gossip you perpetuate is not factual and comes from no actual source. It's down to you to prove your assumptions, that's kind of how it works.

[Marsh.]

An assumption isn’t fact though

Stop baiting by pointing out the obvious Glenn.

[The Slim Reaper]

It's baiting to point out your use of the word "fact" is wildly incorrect? Ok jet.

Listening to biased journalism is not "groundwork" and does not elevate what amounts to nothing more than malicious gossip to anything more than what it is.

I don't really need to backup my post that the gossip you perpetuate is not factual and comes from no actual source. It's down to you to prove your assumptions, that's kind of how it works.

C'mon Marsh. Prove I don't have an invisible unicorn in my garage.

[jet]

Reasoned assumptions are all any journalist can make. But 'reasoned' is the key word here if they are coming to conclusions from what the source themselves have said, in this case, the Sussex'es themselves.

And do I have to repeat again that I only trust the opinions of the respected royal correspondents. They have proved to be right time and time again and 'in the know' over many years - many times when I didn't want them to be. I seek out what they are saying for that reason.

So sneer at me all you like for doing some reading because it isn't what you want to hear. Time will tell.

[jet]

It's down to you to prove your assumptions, that's kind of how it works.

But you don't have to prove yours? :smug:

[Marsh.]

But you don't have to prove yours? :smug:

Prove my what? My comment that your opinions are baseless gossip and not factual points?

It speaks for itself.

[Marsh.]

So sneer at me all you like for doing some reading because it isn't what you want to hear. Time will tell.

Oh yes I'll sneer at what you choose as reading material but that has nothing to do with you misunderstanding fact, opinion and fiction.

Read what you like Jet, but don't pretend your fiction is fact. :)

[Black Dagger]

This bloke is an absolute parasite. Desperate and tacky as always.

[jet]

This bloke is an absolute parasite. Desperate and tacky as always.

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

[Beso]

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

For once, the band madness and the song embarrassment, would be true.

[Tom4784]

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

A nice man that tried to make money on his daughter's engagement by setting up situations with the paparazzi and selling stories on his own daughter.

If this was anybody else's father but Meghan's, I don't believe for a second you would defend them.

[jet]

A nice man that tried to make money on his daughter's engagement by setting up situations with the paparazzi and selling stories on his own daughter.

If this was anybody else's father but Meghan's, I don't believe for a second you would defend them.

The poor man was left to cope on his own after the romance hit the headlines with dozens of press camped outside his door and following him around taking unflattering pics of him looking dishevelled and buying some beers.

Then his other daughter sets it up that they get a few pics of him in a more controlled and flattering light and BOOM, Meghan and Harry come down on him like a ton of bricks and Harry apparently read him the riot act.
That was when it all started to go wrong. He should have been shown the respect of being introduced to Harry and given protection from the press. He was given no advice or direction at all.

He refused payment for any other interviews, the papers and media involved made a point of saying so.

[Twosugars]

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.

How do you know what motivated her? Can you mind read?
And dont start with "respected royal correspondents" bc they can't mind read either.


Btw do you know those correspondents are widely disliked by all members of the royal family? For being nosey and presumptuous hacks.

[Beso]

How do you know what motivated her? Can you mind read?
And dont start with "respected royal correspondents" bc they can't mind read either.


Btw do you know those correspondents are widely disliked by all members of the royal family? For being nosey and presumptuous hacks.



Official....:wavey:

[jet]

Btw do you know those correspondents are widely disliked by all members of the royal family? For being nosey and presumptuous hacks.

Did you read that in the tabloids? Or are you talking about the one that Prince Charles didn't like? I guess thats why they get inside info and all. :laugh:

[Twosugars]

Did you read that in the tabloids? Or are you talking about the one that Prince Charles didn't like? I guess thats why they get inside info and all. :laugh:

They get gossip from staff and they get hostile briefings from time to time.
Neither can be considered objective source unless backed up by evidence and corroborated by independent sources.


When Woodward and Bernstein broke the Watergate scandal they sought 3 independent sources of every scrap of info they dared to publish. That's journalism not hack job for clicks or money

[Marsh.]

They get gossip from staff and they get hostile briefings from time to time.
Neither can be considered objective source unless backed up by evidence and corroborated by independent sources.


When Woodward and Bernstein broke the Watergate scandal they sought 3 independent sources of every scrap of info they dared to publish. That's journalism not hack job for clicks or money

Spot. On.

[jet]

They get gossip from staff and they get hostile briefings from time to time.
Neither can be considered objective source unless backed up by evidence and corroborated by independent sources.


When Woodward and Bernstein broke the Watergate scandal they sought 3 independent sources of every scrap of info they dared to publish. That's journalism not hack job for clicks or money

Yet they are proved right over and over again. You really don't know that the Royals leak stuff bit by bit so big dramas that are coming have less impact on the public?- they've been doing it for years.

[Cherie]

Obviously they are called Royal correspondents for a reason :laugh: Tom Bradbury in particular seems to be very well informed

[Marsh.]

Obviously they are called Royal correspondents for a reason :laugh: Tom Bradbury in particular seems to be very well informed

Well, they call Piers Morgan a journalist so the world is full of crazy things. :hehe:

[Beso]

Obviously they are called Royal correspondents for a reason :laugh: Tom Bradbury in particular seems to be very well informed

Official royal correspondents :fist:

[Ammi]

...apparently according to the lawyers for The Mail On Sunday and Mail Online ...Meghan must have been fully aware that the letter would be published because her handwriting was so neat...I guess it’s a parent’s back in the day advice, like always wear clean underwear etc...’just in case your letters are published by the national media, make sure we can all read them, my love...neat, neat, neat at all times...’...


https://uk.yahoo.com/news/neat-handwriting-shows-meghan-expected-142751298.html

[arista]

The Mail will Win in Court

[bots]

Meghan is on sticky ground because unless the newspaper obtained the information illegally, privacy does not apply. If her father gave them a copy, they are perfectly entitled to publish it. They are also under no obligation to either print the whole letter or provide context to the parts they did publish

Seems to me her gripe is really with her father and that is extremely unfortunate if it gets aired in court

[Liam-]

Wether her father gave them the letter or not, I think there are guidelines and laws in place involving the manipulation of communications to skew the original meaning for a false narrative that the media have to adhere to.

I personally feel that it’s about time for another inquiry, our media, the majority of it run by only 4 people, has turned into such utter trash, in a time of political upheaval and divisiveness, media outlets should not be allowed to put out such biased, corrupt coverage as they have done for the past couple of years.

[bots]

The whole point of a free press is that there are very few restrictions on what they can print. Meddling with that will only be for the worse

[Liam-]

Free press yes, that’s the right to report on any story they want to, but they’re not allowed to purposely deceive and misconstrue something to achieve a false story

[Livia]

They should have slipped away quietly. No one would have noticed... instead we have another Meghan Media Circus. Far from taking them out of the limelight, the press are even more frantic to get to them now. Boring. Enough already.

[Nicky91]

not the OP, and those thread title changes :skull:

[bots]

shouldnt this thread be called cOURT? :idc:

[arista]

"High court megan markle "


Can admin correct the title please