View Full Version : Donald Trump gasses his own people for a propaganda video
1267685430985662466
1267769176271343616
1267641244794212352
NOTE: The protest outside the White House was peaceful there was NO rioting taking place.
1267582823428501508
These people were trapped behind a gate and the police threw tear gas at them.
America is quickly turning into a fascist state. This is all just atrocious, the Western world hasn't seen anything like this in recent memory.
Tom4784
02-06-2020, 12:36 PM
There's nothing that peadophile won't do and nothing his supporters won't defend.
Denver
02-06-2020, 12:40 PM
They are heading for a dictatorship but he has put a bounty on his head, under the 2nd amendment civilians can shoot and kill tyrant militants and governments if there life is in danger
arista
02-06-2020, 01:11 PM
They are heading for a dictatorship but he has put a bounty on his head, under the 2nd amendment civilians can shoot and kill tyrant militants and governments if there life is in danger
No
they want the Public not to
become Criminal
Denver
02-06-2020, 01:12 PM
No
they want the Public not to
become Criminal
Martial Law is taking away the rights of the public
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 01:15 PM
They are a public health hazard and got what they deserved. They put millions of peoples lives at risk just so they could throw their tantrum.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
arista
02-06-2020, 01:16 PM
Martial Law is taking away the rights of the public
Yes
leave the area
on a Curfew
Denver
02-06-2020, 01:16 PM
They are a public health hazard and got what they deserved.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
So innocent people deserve to die?
armand.kay
02-06-2020, 01:22 PM
The fact that he can do this and people still defend him is terrifying.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZfODbpU0AAB4sh?format=jpg&name=small
Uncanny. We never learn.
Denver
02-06-2020, 01:31 PM
He is going to the Shrine if John Paul II today for photos.
He clearly doesnt know about anything the man thought for because it's the opposite to what he wants
Tom4784
02-06-2020, 01:36 PM
The fact that he can do this and people still defend him is terrifying.
As long as you're openly racist, racists will bend over backwards to protect you.
Liam-
02-06-2020, 02:03 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZgxlLXUYAI9LC_?format=jpg&name=large
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 02:12 PM
So innocent people deserve to die?They are not innonecent. They are endangering millions of people.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Denver
02-06-2020, 02:13 PM
They are not innonecent. They are endangering millions of people.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Trump is endangering 300 million people
armand.kay
02-06-2020, 02:21 PM
They are not innonecent. They are endangering millions of people.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
by protesting?
RileyH
02-06-2020, 02:26 PM
Absolutely disgusting but I'm not even shocked at this point. Still an absolute joke he's the president and an absolute joke he'll be elected for a 2nd term.
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 02:27 PM
Trump is endangering 300 million peopleSo you dont want to talk about the crowd that got dispersed any longer?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Denver
02-06-2020, 02:28 PM
So you dont want to talk about the crowd that got dispersed any longer?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The crowd who did nothing wrong that was violently dispersed so a fat paedophiles could walk a few feet to take a picture with an upside down bible?
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 02:29 PM
by protesting?By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Denver
02-06-2020, 02:30 PM
By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Trumo hasn't cared about the virus for 3 months so its habit late caring now after he cause over a 100k deaths
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 02:32 PM
The crowd who did nothing wrong that was violently dispersed so a fat paedophiles could walk a few feet to take a picture with an upside down bible?They do not have a right to infect people with a fatal virus in the process. They do not have a right to violate curfews. Trump does have a right to personally go acess the damages.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Mitchell
02-06-2020, 02:36 PM
446461592029630464
armand.kay
02-06-2020, 02:37 PM
By not social distancing while they protest. That is a public health health hazard. Their right to protest does not trump the publics right to not die from a disease they are spreading.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Then why didn't the shoot and tear gas the lunatics who were protesting because they wanted hair cuts and Starbucks coffee??? Also I thought Murica was the land of the free? Why did they send their military to the middle east to find their freedoms if they can't even protest without being attacked?
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 03:01 PM
Then why didn't the shoot and tear gas the lunatics who were protesting because they wanted hair cuts and Starbucks coffee??? Also I thought Murica was the land of the free? Why did they send their military to the middle east to find their freedoms if they can't even protest without being attacked?Freedom isnt absolute. Your rights dont get to put others in danger. Thats what the left was telling everyone up until theie campagin rally started in Minnesota last week. If people dont have a right to assemble in churches why do they have a right to assemble to protest. Its litterally the same constitutional right.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Greg!
02-06-2020, 03:02 PM
A revolution is needed. Disgusting man
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 04:07 PM
The crowd who did nothing wrong that was violently dispersed so a fat paedophiles could walk a few feet to take a picture with an upside down bible?The crowd that failed to back up when requested to do so and needed and recieved the appropriate amount of encouragement. That crowd.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Denver
02-06-2020, 04:09 PM
The crowd that failed to back up when requested to do so and needed and recieved the appropriate amount of encouragement. That crowd.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
The crowd had a legal right to be there
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 04:10 PM
Trumo hasn't cared about the virus for 3 months so its habit late caring now after he cause over a 100k deathsAgain i thought we were discussing the crowd. You keep going off topic.
The crowd according to the lefts criteria posed a public safety risk and have no 1A right.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Trump is going to extraordinary lengths to regain "control" of that country. The fact he was hiding in his bunker pissing himself while protesters rocked up on his literal doorstep is hilarious to me. He's acting like a manic child who will do and say anything to weasel his way out of trouble. His entire presidency has been strikingly reminiscent of someone who is living out their miniature wargaming fantasy on a grand scale, and it's terrifying to see.
Denver
02-06-2020, 04:26 PM
They are doing preliminary voting today so it will be interested in where that goes
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 05:29 PM
The crowd had a legal right to be thereThe SS has a legal right to disperse them.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Denver
02-06-2020, 05:31 PM
The SS has a legal right to disperse them.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Not under the human rights act they didnt
armand.kay
02-06-2020, 05:54 PM
Freedom isnt absolute. Your rights dont get to put others in danger. Thats what the left was telling everyone up until theie campagin rally started in Minnesota last week. If people dont have a right to assemble in churches why do they have a right to assemble to protest. Its litterally the same constitutional right.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
You didn't answer my first question, why is it one rule for a group of white people who want a hair cut and another rule for BLM?? Also wasn't America opening everything up and telling people to go back to work??
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 06:32 PM
Not under the human rights act they didntLink?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Trouble1321075
02-06-2020, 07:07 PM
You didn't answer my first question, why is it one rule for a group of white people who want a hair cut and another rule for BLM?? Also wasn't America opening everything up and telling people to go back to work??If they decided to tear gas them for refusing to dusperse the police would be within their right to do so
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Crimson Dynamo
03-06-2020, 10:08 AM
NO TEARGAS WAS USED
this thread is fake news i am afraid
Every single major media outlet falsely reported that Park Police were unprovoked when they used “tear gas” to clear the area. If any of that were true, it might mark the first time in history that cops without gas masks launched tear gas in an area that the president of the United States easily walked through minutes later.
"After thousands of false tweets, print stories, and broadcast stories to the contrary, local journalist Neal Augenstein of WTOP reported that a Park Police source said “tear gas was never used — instead smoke canisters were deployed, which don’t have an uncomfortable irritant in them.” Further, the source said the crowd was dispersed because of projectiles being thrown by the “peaceful protesters” at the Park Police and because “peaceful protesters” had climbed on top of a structure in Lafayette Park that had been burned the prior night.
Sgt. Eduardo Delgado, the public information officer for the Park Police, confirmed the agency did not use tear gas. And later this afternoon, United States Park Police acting Chief Gregory T. Monahan exploded the entire false narrative:
On Monday, June 1, the USPP worked with the United States Secret Service to have temporary fencing installed inside Lafayette Park. At approximately 6:33 pm, violent protestors on H Street NW began throwing projectiles including bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids. The protestors also climbed onto a historic building at the north end of Lafayette Park that was destroyed by arson days prior. Intelligence had revealed calls for violence against the police, and officers found caches of glass bottles, baseball bats and metal poles hidden along the street.
To curtail the violence that was underway, the USPP, following established policy, issued three warnings over a loudspeaker to alert demonstrators on H Street to evacuate the area. Horse mounted patrol, Civil Disturbance Units and additional personnel were used to clear the area. As many of the protestors became more combative, continued to throw projectiles, and attempted to grab officers’ weapons, officers then employed the use of smoke canisters and pepper balls. No tear gas was used by USPP officers or other assisting law enforcement partners to close the area at Lafayette Park. Subsequently, the fence was installed.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/02/media-falsely-claimed-violent-riots-were-peaceful-and-that-tear-gas-was-used-against-rioters/#.XtcNEnwYfhc.twitter
i wonder what other lies have been told?
:think:
Liam-
03-06-2020, 10:14 AM
I’ll take the word of the journalists and protesters on the ground who were hit with the teargas over a right wing rag tyvm
Crimson Dynamo
03-06-2020, 10:19 AM
I’ll take the word of the journalists and protesters on the ground who were hit with the teargas over a right wing rag tyvm
thats the problem you have liam, you are just believing what ever fits in with your own political narrative and not what is actually happening.
This is not good for your health
Sgt. Eduardo Delgado, the public information officer for the Park Police, confirmed the agency did not use tear gas.
If you have evidence to say he is lying then produce it here:
Toy Soldier
03-06-2020, 10:29 AM
Hmm. That does sound plausible if the police weren't wearing masks (any photo receipts for that?) and yes, the gas would linger so you couldn't clear people from an area using tear gas and then immediately move through that area without protection.
However that only makes it semi fake news. I'm not really convinced that clearing a crowd with smoke grenades (which yes would also cause minor eye and chest irritation) so that the pres can take a propaganda photo makes it OK? It's still absolutely ****ed.
Crimson Dynamo
03-06-2020, 10:43 AM
Hmm. That does sound plausible if the police weren't wearing masks (any photo receipts for that?) and yes, the gas would linger so you couldn't clear people from an area using tear gas and then immediately move through that area without protection.
However that only makes it semi fake news. I'm not really convinced that clearing a crowd with smoke grenades (which yes would also cause minor eye and chest irritation) so that the pres can take a propaganda photo makes it OK? It's still absolutely ****ed.
what is ********** up is how easy it is for lies to spread via twitter when people are interested more in likes than truth
Toy Soldier
03-06-2020, 11:03 AM
what is ********** up is how easy it is for lies to spread via twitter when people are interested more in likes than truthI don't disagree with that, I think my thoughts on the media (both printed and social) are quite well aired on here but I do disagree with your general stance on the current issues in the US. There are huge problems with racial prejudice, there are huge problems with abuse of power in the US police force and in politics, there have been forever. Ignoring or refuting that entirely is disingenuous and yes... :worry:... It's racist.
Crimson Dynamo
03-06-2020, 11:06 AM
I don't disagree with that, I think my thoughts on the media (both printed and social) are quite well aired on here but I do disagree with your general stance on the current issues in the US. There are huge problems with racial prejudice, there are huge problems with abuse of power in the US police force and in politics, there have been forever. Ignoring or refuting that entirely is disingenuous and yes... :worry:... It's racist.
whatever it is its no excuse for robbing ps4's from Target
(when PS5 is literally a few months away)
Toy Soldier
03-06-2020, 11:18 AM
whatever it is its no excuse for robbing ps4's from Target
(when PS5 is literally a few months away)
Rioting and looting is a symptom, glaring at it as an excuse to ignore the problem that lead to that symptom (I find) is usually little more than an attempt to deny that the problem exists. There's a huge underlying issue in the US that has lead to civil unrest. Some people have used the cover of civil unrest to loot/cause chaos for their own reasons - e.g. you also have the general anarchist groups joining in because they're relishing the opportunity to attack systems of power ... even though many of them have significant crossover with white power groups themselves.
This is what happens during civil unrest, it always has been and it always will be, going back to Rome and beyond.
It doesn't mean that the original cause, the frustration, and injustices that caused the initial civil unrest are not real or are not important and those issues aren't going anywhere if people can't stop themselves from being so distracted by the loud noises on the periphery that they can't (or wont - because they don't actually want to) take 10 minutes to think about that core issue.
Smithy
03-06-2020, 11:22 AM
NO TEARGAS WAS USED
this thread is fake news i am afraid
Every single major media outlet falsely reported that Park Police were unprovoked when they used “tear gas” to clear the area. If any of that were true, it might mark the first time in history that cops without gas masks launched tear gas in an area that the president of the United States easily walked through minutes later.
"After thousands of false tweets, print stories, and broadcast stories to the contrary, local journalist Neal Augenstein of WTOP reported that a Park Police source said “tear gas was never used — instead smoke canisters were deployed, which don’t have an uncomfortable irritant in them.” Further, the source said the crowd was dispersed because of projectiles being thrown by the “peaceful protesters” at the Park Police and because “peaceful protesters” had climbed on top of a structure in Lafayette Park that had been burned the prior night.
Sgt. Eduardo Delgado, the public information officer for the Park Police, confirmed the agency did not use tear gas. And later this afternoon, United States Park Police acting Chief Gregory T. Monahan exploded the entire false narrative:
On Monday, June 1, the USPP worked with the United States Secret Service to have temporary fencing installed inside Lafayette Park. At approximately 6:33 pm, violent protestors on H Street NW began throwing projectiles including bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids. The protestors also climbed onto a historic building at the north end of Lafayette Park that was destroyed by arson days prior. Intelligence had revealed calls for violence against the police, and officers found caches of glass bottles, baseball bats and metal poles hidden along the street.
To curtail the violence that was underway, the USPP, following established policy, issued three warnings over a loudspeaker to alert demonstrators on H Street to evacuate the area. Horse mounted patrol, Civil Disturbance Units and additional personnel were used to clear the area. As many of the protestors became more combative, continued to throw projectiles, and attempted to grab officers’ weapons, officers then employed the use of smoke canisters and pepper balls. No tear gas was used by USPP officers or other assisting law enforcement partners to close the area at Lafayette Park. Subsequently, the fence was installed.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/02/media-falsely-claimed-violent-riots-were-peaceful-and-that-tear-gas-was-used-against-rioters/#.XtcNEnwYfhc.twitter
i wonder what other lies have been told?
:think:
Dozens of articles: tear gas was used
One right wing Christian site: no it wasn’t
LT: sounds legit guys I think we should believe them
Liam-
03-06-2020, 11:42 AM
1268144515115814912
Denver
03-06-2020, 12:02 PM
whatever it is its no excuse for robbing ps4's from Target
(when PS5 is literally a few months away)
No need for Trum and his pals to steals millions from Americand
Crimson Dynamo
03-06-2020, 12:29 PM
1268144515115814912
And the police in the pic are not wearing gas masks?
I wonder why?
The Slim Reaper
03-06-2020, 01:02 PM
So if there was no Antifa there but people were pretending to be antifa, who do we suspect as the perps? Hmmmmmmmm
1268151172608790528
Denver
03-06-2020, 01:06 PM
So if there was no Antifa there but people were pretending to be antifa, who do we suspect as the perps? Hmmmmmmmm
1268151172608790528
We already know Proud Boys were involved and another White Supremacist group was posing as Antifa on Twitter
Oliver_W
03-06-2020, 01:12 PM
It doesn't matter who it was, rioting and looting should be stopped.
The Slim Reaper
03-06-2020, 01:17 PM
It doesn't matter who it was, rioting and looting should be stopped.
If a group is impersonating another group to try and move the narrative of what was happening, it absolutely does matter.
arista
03-06-2020, 01:18 PM
"police threw tear gas at them."
Fake news from Sam
Police confirmed they were pepper bombs
Not Tear Gas
Denver
03-06-2020, 01:20 PM
It's becoming obvious Antifa doesnt exist and it's something Teump is using to silence his critics so he can lock them up after accusing them
Oliver_W
03-06-2020, 01:21 PM
If a group is impersonating another group to try and move the narrative of what was happening, it absolutely does matter.
Then that can be added to their charges, all that matters while they're looting and rioting is that they're stopped :shrug:
Denver
03-06-2020, 01:21 PM
The officers who shot over 10 peoples eyes out and almost killed a 16 year old boy need to face attempted murder charges
The officers who shot over 10 peoples eyes out and almost killed a 16 year old boy need to face manslaughter charges
they didn't kill anyone so how can they face manslaughter charges and they were using non lethal force
Denver
03-06-2020, 01:53 PM
they didn't kill anyone so how can they face manslaughter charges and they were using non lethal force
Rubber bullet are not meant to be shot at people so if they are shot directly at people then we have a problem
Rubber bullet are not meant to be shot at people so if they are shot directly at people then we have a problem
if they wanted to avoid trouble they shouldnt have been protesting on the street. The police could have used their guns
Denver
03-06-2020, 02:07 PM
So your saying police can kill people using their right of the 1st Amendment?
Oliver_W
03-06-2020, 02:14 PM
Rubber bullet are not meant to be shot at people so if they are shot directly at people then we have a problem
Sure. But for someone to face manslaughter charges, someone would need to ... die?
Denver
03-06-2020, 02:21 PM
Sure. But for someone to face manslaughter charges, someone would need to ... die?
Anyway I just realised I put manslaughter I did actually mean attempted murder I have no idea why I put that
The Slim Reaper
05-06-2020, 06:44 PM
no teargas was used
this thread is fake news i am afraid
every single major media outlet falsely reported that park police were unprovoked when they used “tear gas” to clear the area. If any of that were true, it might mark the first time in history that cops without gas masks launched tear gas in an area that the president of the united states easily walked through minutes later.
"after thousands of false tweets, print stories, and broadcast stories to the contrary, local journalist neal augenstein of wtop reported that a park police source said “tear gas was never used — instead smoke canisters were deployed, which don’t have an uncomfortable irritant in them.” further, the source said the crowd was dispersed because of projectiles being thrown by the “peaceful protesters” at the park police and because “peaceful protesters” had climbed on top of a structure in lafayette park that had been burned the prior night.
Sgt. Eduardo delgado, the public information officer for the park police, confirmed the agency did not use tear gas. And later this afternoon, united states park police acting chief gregory t. Monahan exploded the entire false narrative:
on monday, june 1, the uspp worked with the united states secret service to have temporary fencing installed inside lafayette park. At approximately 6:33 pm, violent protestors on h street nw began throwing projectiles including bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids. The protestors also climbed onto a historic building at the north end of lafayette park that was destroyed by arson days prior. Intelligence had revealed calls for violence against the police, and officers found caches of glass bottles, baseball bats and metal poles hidden along the street.
To curtail the violence that was underway, the uspp, following established policy, issued three warnings over a loudspeaker to alert demonstrators on h street to evacuate the area. Horse mounted patrol, civil disturbance units and additional personnel were used to clear the area. As many of the protestors became more combative, continued to throw projectiles, and attempted to grab officers’ weapons, officers then employed the use of smoke canisters and pepper balls. No tear gas was used by uspp officers or other assisting law enforcement partners to close the area at lafayette park. Subsequently, the fence was installed.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/02/media-falsely-claimed-violent-riots-were-peaceful-and-that-tear-gas-was-used-against-rioters/#.xtcnenwyfhc.twitter
i wonder what other lies have been told?
:think:
1268955519970091009
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.