PIERS MORGAN presents a hilarious sneak preview of Meghan and Harry's Netflix deal

[jet]

Enjoyed this :joker:

'Around the world in 80 private jets' and other adventures: PIERS MORGAN presents a hilarious sneak preview of the woke TV the world can expect from Meghan and Harry's $150million Netflix deal
………...what they have inspired is me to now cast a crystal ball and look into the future to imagine the kind of hyper-woke, self-serving productions that I look forward to seeing on Netflix from Megxit Productions:

1) HOW TO HAVE YOUR ROYAL CAKE AND EAT IT - An inspiring and educational film in which the Sussexes throw vegan tea (Echinacea, obviously!) parties at their palatial Santa Barbara mansion for random strangers and explain how to milk (Almond…obviously!) the Royal Family brand name for massive financial gain.

2) AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 PRIVATE JETS - A lavish travel docu-series in which we follow the Duke and Duchess around as they bang on endlessly about the environment, saving the planet and the urgent need to reduce one's carbon footprint during live broadcasts filmed aboard their famous friends' private jets. Cameos from George Clooney, Sir Elton John and bankers from JP Morgan.

3) THE BROTHER GRIMM - An animated children's film depicting a fierce sibling rivalry between a saintly, much-misunderstood sensitive caring hero named Harry who never does anything wrong and his evil older brother William who has the audacity to think being the heir to the throne gives him some kind of entitlement to be treated differently, and even worse, had the bloody gall to suggest Harry think hard about marrying an ultra-woke, fame-hungry, much older American C-list actress divorcee social climber with a history of dumping people.

4) MEAT THE PARENT FOCKERS - A horror movie reboot of the popular comedy movie franchise starring the heroine's father Thomas – played by Robert de Niro – who gets disowned for daring to do exactly what his daughter did and collude with paparazzi, and ends up suffering a grisly demise when furious Meghan throws him into a meat-packing mincer during an angry reunion. She immediately blames the incident on the 'racist media'.

5) THE FROWN – A regal drama sequel to The Crown in which a rogue asteroid hits Sandringham during Christmas lunch, wiping out the top tier of the Royal Family, and meaning Harry and Meghan – who snubbed the holiday to be on Oprah's yacht instead - finally become King and Queen. Unfortunately, having got what they so badly craved, they spend so much time whining about everything ('The gold-plated Buckingham Palace toilet seats don't have enough gold in them!) and greedily exploiting their new-found status (Meghan is caught selling 'boring' royal art on eBay) that the British public rises up in fury and demands Prince Andrew replaces them as Monarch to reintroduce some integrity to the throne.

6) KEEPING UP WITH THE SUSSEXES – A Kardashian-style 24/7 fly-on-the-wall reality show featuring Harry and Meghan as two very private people leading very private lives with lots of scenes involving their son Archie who they want to keep very private.

7) FROGMORE COTTAGE – An enthralling Downtown Abbey style period drama set inside the lavish walls of the Sussexes' home in England where a huge privileged family spend the entire time plotting against each other and settling endless petty scores.

8) IS MEGHAN OK? - A powerful mental health documentary filmed at the height of the pandemic when health workers earning a pittance were dying in their droves trying to save lives. It features Meghan, wearing a suit of armor once worn by Joan of Arc, sitting inside billionaire star Tyler Perry's Beverly Hills mansion, being served chilled champagne by a butler, as Harry washes her laundry, asking the one burning question everyone in the world was asking as Covid-19 ran riot – 'WHY DOES NOBODY ASK MEGHAN IF SHE'S OK?'

9) WOKE ME UP BEFORE YOU GO GO - A musical about a ginger-haired teetotal kale-munching pop star named Harry Prince that falls for a fame-hungry B-list actress who forces him to abandon his family and country, wokes him to within an inch of his life, and then dumps him for Leonardo DiCaprio when he offers her co-star role in Titanic 2.

10) I DON'T WANT TO BE A VACUOUS CELEBRITY ANY MORE, GET ME OUT OF HERE – Harry finally grows a pair big enough to escape his woke hell, comes home, plays naked billiards, re-joins the Army and marries one of the dim blonde Young Conservatives that his brother told him he should marry in the first place.

:joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b0/09/39b009a83a8e29a021361bcc27998671.gif

[UserSince2005]

Maybe we could a get a reboot of I Wanna Marry "Harry" with the real Harry.

Obviously they would have to get a divorce but money is money at the end of the day.

[Liam-]

Hilarious

[jet]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b0/09/39b009a83a8e29a021361bcc27998671.gif

:joker:

[Kizzy]

re-joins the Army and marries one of the dim blonde Young Conservatives that his brother told him he should marry in the first place.... bet he'd rather cut his nads off with a rusty bread knife.

[Crimson Dynamo]

re-joins the Army and cuts his nads off with a rusty bread knife.


Sounds like one of their successful pitches to Netflix :hehe:

That and Monkey Tennis

[bots]

i may watch what they produce out of morbid curiosity .... from that perspective netflix have played a blinder

[jet]

re-joins the Army and marries one of the dim blonde Young Conservatives that his brother told him he should marry in the first place.... bet he'd rather cut his nads off with a rusty bread knife.

:hehe:

He likes smart ladies though. South African Chelsey Davey (law degree, businesswoman) was Harry’s first love of 6 years. He wanted to marry her and live a quiet life in his beloved S.Africa, but she turned him down in the end. He always said she was the love of his life - before he met Megs of course. Couldn’t risk it afterwards, she might cut off his nads with a rusty bread knife….:hee:

[Cherie]

i may watch what they produce out of morbid curiosity .... from that perspective netflix have played a blinder

That's the idea, same with the Obamas, though I have no idea what they were involved in, maybe its a work in progress :think:

[Cherie]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b0/09/39b009a83a8e29a021361bcc27998671.gif

:joker:

that is a very unflattering gif of Will and Kate :laugh:

[rusticgal]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b0/09/39b009a83a8e29a021361bcc27998671.gif



Absolutely brilliant...:joker:

[jet]

NETFLIX is to screen a tacky musical about Princess Diana — after signing up her son Harry and his wife Meghan in a £112million deal.

In the show the Queen calls the tragic princess a “tart”, while another scene sees Diana in bed with James Hewitt.
Her former bodyguard Ken Wharfe tonight urged Harry to get the musical pulled.

The musical also sees the Queen say to Diana: “In the old days we would have chopped off your head.”
The streaming giant is to air the sordid show despite signing Di’s son Harry and wife Meghan in the mega deal.

However, Harry was facing calls last night to stand up to his new TV paymasters and get Diana: A New Musical pulled.
The stage show details the breakdown of Charles and Diana’s marriage with swathes of vulgar dialogue and scenes of fiction…….

…...The show was previewed in New York in March — with theatregoers promised a tale about a “fearless princess who became timeless”.
However, a planned Broadway run was cancelled amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Netflix now plans to record it again this month at a New York theatre and broadcast it next year.

Ken Wharfe, 72, Diana’s former bodyguard, last night said Harry could now call on Netflix to ditch the “abhorrent” musical.
He said: “The Diana musical, soon to be premiered on Netflix, presents a huge dilemma to them both. If the critics are to be believed, this musical story is not a joyous journey of love with a happy ending but an episodic account of untruths, scandal and sex.

“Harry loved his mother dearly and has spoken of her in such loving detail recently.
“He now has the chance, irrespective of his lucrative deal with Netflix, to stand alone from his wife and make clear his abhorrence of such a musical and call Netflix to account.

“If he were to do this, his fading popularity would be guaranteed a huge resurgence.”
Representatives for Netflix and Meghan and Harry did not respond to requests for comment.
.................................................. .......................................

Hmmm...I wonder what he'll do.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12577043/netflix-diana-musical-harry-meghan/#:~:text=NETFLIX%20is%20to%20screen%20a,in%20bed%2 0with%20James%20Hewitt.

[Oliver_W]

I thought he was ignoring them now :shrug:

[Liam-]

I thought he was ignoring them now :shrug:

He’s got a book to sell!

[Beso]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/39/b0/09/39b009a83a8e29a021361bcc27998671.gif

😍

[Beso]

Look at that giff...kate is far more like diane than meghan..

Baldy husband and a brave face..

Not like harry/Andy meghan/fergie........and we all know how that's turning out..poor kids.

[Marsh.]

Yes, that's what everyone wants, a wife who looks like their mother. :/

[Beso]

Yes, that's what everyone wants, a wife who looks like their mother. :/

She looks nothing like Diane....what you trying to say now?

[Marsh.]

She looks nothing like Diane....what you trying to say now?

Who is this Diane you keep talking about?

[Beso]

Of wales.

[Beso]

I camt help glasses and predictive text.

[Marsh.]

Of wales.

Ah, Diane of Wales.

[Beso]

But Kate's more like her than meghan ever will be..meghan and harry are the spam or fraybentos pie version of andrew and Sarah's half cooked steak at Miller and Carter..

[Beso]

Ah, Diane of Wales.
Glad you agree.

[Marsh.]

But Kate's more like her than meghan ever will be..meghan and harry are the spam or fraybentos pie version of andrew and Sarah's half cooked steak at Miller and Carter..

I don't think it's a competition about who can "be the most like their husband's dead mother". They are their own individuals.

But, yeah, comparing them unfavourably to Andrew is really rational. :thumbs:

[jet]

He’s got a book to sell!

Didn't know this so just looked it up on Amazon. It's called 'Wake Up: Why the world has gone nuts'.
Preview: If, like me, you’re sick and tired of being told how to think, speak, eat and behave, then this book is for you.

Out in October, if anyones interested. :hehe:

[Marsh.]

Didn't know this

:joker:

[Cherie]

NETFLIX is to screen a tacky musical about Princess Diana — after signing up her son Harry and his wife Meghan in a £112million deal.

In the show the Queen calls the tragic princess a “tart”, while another scene sees Diana in bed with James Hewitt.
Her former bodyguard Ken Wharfe tonight urged Harry to get the musical pulled.

The musical also sees the Queen say to Diana: “In the old days we would have chopped off your head.”
The streaming giant is to air the sordid show despite signing Di’s son Harry and wife Meghan in the mega deal.

However, Harry was facing calls last night to stand up to his new TV paymasters and get Diana: A New Musical pulled.
The stage show details the breakdown of Charles and Diana’s marriage with swathes of vulgar dialogue and scenes of fiction…….

…...The show was previewed in New York in March — with theatregoers promised a tale about a “fearless princess who became timeless”.
However, a planned Broadway run was cancelled amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Netflix now plans to record it again this month at a New York theatre and broadcast it next year.

Ken Wharfe, 72, Diana’s former bodyguard, last night said Harry could now call on Netflix to ditch the “abhorrent” musical.
He said: “The Diana musical, soon to be premiered on Netflix, presents a huge dilemma to them both. If the critics are to be believed, this musical story is not a joyous journey of love with a happy ending but an episodic account of untruths, scandal and sex.

“Harry loved his mother dearly and has spoken of her in such loving detail recently.
“He now has the chance, irrespective of his lucrative deal with Netflix, to stand alone from his wife and make clear his abhorrence of such a musical and call Netflix to account.

“If he were to do this, his fading popularity would be guaranteed a huge resurgence.”
Representatives for Netflix and Meghan and Harry did not respond to requests for comment.
.................................................. .......................................

Hmmm...I wonder what he'll do.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12577043/netflix-diana-musical-harry-meghan/#:~:text=NETFLIX%20is%20to%20screen%20a,in%20bed%2 0with%20James%20Hewitt.

That’s a bit weird, as part of any agreement you would expect he had it canned?

[jet]

That’s a bit weird, as part of any agreement you would expect he had it canned?

Absolutely.
Harry despised the press for exploiting his mother for profit - yet he makes a deal with Netflix who are exploiting his mother for profit.

But the price is right I guess, just like when he got paid megabucks by bankers to make a speech about how her death affected him.

[rusticgal]

Absolutely.
Harry despised the press for exploiting his mother for profit - yet he makes a deal with Netflix who are exploiting his mother for profit.

But the price is right I guess, just like when he got paid megabucks by bankers to make a speech about how her death affected him.



Im surprised he is having anything to do with them in that case...:nono: but maybe he is getting desperate for a job :laugh:

[Kizzy]

Didn't know this so just looked it up on Amazon. It's called 'Wake Up: Why the world has gone nuts'.
Preview:

Out in October, if anyones interested. :hehe:

'If, like me, you’re sick and tired of being told how to think, speak, eat and behave, then this book is for you'.

So he wrote it for Harry and Meghan?..

[jet]

'If, like me, you’re sick and tired of being told how to think, speak, eat and behave, then this book is for you'.

So he wrote it for Harry and Meghan?..

As self absorbed eternal victims, they will probably think it is. :laugh:

[Kizzy]

As self absorbed eternal victims, they will probably think it is. :laugh:

However ...they didn't write a book about it did they? The guy who is making all kinds of accusations and assumptions did :/

[jet]

AMANDA PLATELL: Meghan Markle will make millions for herself - but Camilla will make a difference to the world

When, more than a year ago, the Duchess of Cornwall first bravely spoke out in this newspaper about the horrors of domestic violence, I doubt I was alone in wondering: What could she possibly understand about it?
And yet through her quiet and diligent work as patron of the charity SafeLives, Camilla has done more than anyone to highlight the plight of abused women.

Yesterday, writing in The Guardian, she pointed out how lockdown has caused a huge increase in the torment suffered by those trapped in these relationships.
‘Abusers work from home,’ SafeLives chillingly warns. There is nothing self-aggrandising about supporting this cause. Domestic violence is gritty and ghastly: one of the least glamorous subjects for which any royal could campaign.
Yet it could still save lives: and Camilla is clearly sincere when she implores people to ‘reach in’ if they suspect someone is a victim, not to wait for them to reach out.
Needless to say, there are no multi-million pound TV deals in this line of work.

In her dogged way, Camilla is following a long tradition of royal women — the Queen, Princesses Diana and Anne, the Duchesses of Wessex and Cambridge — who undertake charity work that is mostly unseen and unsung.

How different is the path chosen by the woman who still takes care to call herself the ‘Duchess of Sussex’ and served the Royal Family for all of two years before she decamped to Los Angeles.

As Meghan and hapless husband Harry revealed in a toe-curlingly woke statement, their new multi-million-pound deal with Netflix will ‘shine a light on people and causes around the world . . . creating content that informs but also gives hope’.
The truth is Meghan knows that if she’d stayed in the Royal Family, she could have done all those things.

But there might not have been such an enormous pay packet for being the self-appointed saviour of the universe.

This former ‘briefcase girl’ on Deal Or No Deal has now become a money-grubbing, international laughing stock.
How I wish Meghan had taken the time to learn something from Camilla, who was once the most vilified woman in Britain.

Yet through hard work, duty and, dare I suggest, a sense of humour and a level of self-awareness that Meghan can only dream of, Camilla has gradually transformed herself into someone most of us respect and admire.
Is it too late for Meghan to do the same?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8699905/AMANDA-PLATELL-Meghan-Markle-make-millions-Camilla-make-difference.html
.................................................

Well said Amanda! I never liked Camilla because my sympathies lay with Diana,
but fair play to her.
Yep, too late for Meghan imo.

[user104658]

"Too late for Megan" after a few years when Camilla was vilified by the press for literal decades? :joker: kk.

[bots]

when all is said and done there are less than a handful of royals that anyone cares about. People are just not interested. Camilla is hardly an example of the public's favourite

[jet]

"Too late for Megan" after a few years when Camilla was vilified by the press for literal decades? :joker: kk.

Well exactly. Camilla was vilified by the press for decades and came through it by quietly getting on with her work, gaining respect.
Megan fled to LA, so its to late for her in the UK. She can't stick it out if she's not here, can she? :laugh:

[user104658]

Well exactly. Camilla was vilified by the press for decades and came through it by quietly getting on with her work, gaining respect.
Megan fled to LA, so its to late for her in the UK. She can't stick it out if she's not here, can she? :laugh:

Ahh so all Harry and Megan had to do to get on the scummy UK press's good side was put up with them and quietly get on with their work for multiple decades never speaking out, and THEN they'd get some respect.

Well ****.

[AnnieK]

Ahh so all Harry and Megan had to do to get on the scummy UK press's good side was put up with them and quietly get on with their work for multiple decades never speaking out, and THEN they'd get some respect.

Well ****.

That's the crux of it I think TS....if only Meghan had developed her stiff upper lip and dealt with the **** the press threw at her....then, just then, maybe, we might, possibly, have tolerated her....no promises but maybe, one day, fingers crossed.

[jet]

Ahh so all Harry and Megan had to do to get on the scummy UK press's good side was put up with them and quietly get on with their work for multiple decades never speaking out, and THEN they'd get some respect.

Well ****.

Camilla was vilified because she was Charles’s mistress, the old bat who took Diana's prince away from her, and the public loved and then lost Diana.
Why on earth do you think Meghan would have needed decades to gain the public’s respect?
Yes, Harry himself said she was well versed in what would be expected of her by himself, the Queen and palace aides. That she would not only be marrying him, but taking on a new job. She was welcomed by the people who were delighted for Harry.

Then her huge ego manifested itself when she announced she was going to modernise the monarchy. Staff were left in tears by her imperious attitude. She went through 4 Nanny’s before Archie was 9 months old ffs! She seemed to go out of her way to rub people up the wrong way. Yes, the press gave her a hard time, but they scrutinised all the young wives in their time and Meghan gave them gift after gift on a plate.
But all this could have been seen as teething problems and could have been turned around quickly enough is she so desired, by yes, quietly getting on with her work for her charities and patronages. Isn’t that what she is always on about, wanting to do good for the world? What better way to do it than in a 'firm' that has so many advantages at its disposal?

But it’s been widely believed for some time by those who would know better than you or I that she and Harry were planning their move to LA as long ago as during their engagement. She had no intention of staying in the UK, and the negative press would be a good excuse to get to LA and make loadsa money, live life among the A listers, and at the same time be seen as a victim.
....and there she is, in LA, living among the A listers and making loadsa money with a Netflix deal and seen as a victim.
She played a blinder.

[michael21]

There a lot of good show on Netflix

[Ammi]

That's the crux of it I think TS....if only Meghan had developed her stiff upper lip and dealt with the **** the press threw at her....then, just then, maybe, we might, possibly, have tolerated her....no promises but maybe, one day, fingers crossed.

...if she had not been Meghan, do you mean, Annie...if she had been more Kate or Camilla or Anne or Sarah or etc...I just cant gel with ‘comparisons’ in that way...it’s so like a parent saying to their child...why can’t you be more like your brother/your sister/your cousin etc...which is effectively saying you’re not good enough being you....whatever their decisions bring them, I’m glad that they’re both remaining true to themselves and not living the one life they have, for others...

[jet]

Imagine that, in your place of work, there arrives a new lower ranked and much less experienced ‘executive’, newly married to the bosses son.
Uncaring of what the boss or anyone might think, she states that she is going to modernize the firm she has just joined. :eek:
She then goes on to ignore the rules of the particular workplace. She makes those in lower positions than herself cry with her demands and attitude.They then leave because they can’t work with her.

She is jealous of your higher position, gained by many many years of hard work, loyalty and scrutiny; she feels she should be on a par with you.
She gets fed up with people bad mouthing her moves, so decides the job isn’t for her after all.
So she writes out her resignation, stating that she expects the firm to still pay part of her salary, retain her company car and all the other perks even though she won’t be working for it anymore. :crazy:
Off she goes, taking the hapless bosses son with her.
That person sounds just like Meghan. :fan:

[Kizzy]

Your imaginings sound less like reality and more like the plot of a straight to TV movie.

[thesheriff443]

They are a pair of self absorbed self pitying hypocrites.

They needed the millions to live the millionaires life style while claiming to know about real suffering.

Tell that to those on the streets or one pay check away from being on the streets they are absolute fake parasites living off the back of a royal heritage.

[jet]

Your imaginings sound less like reality and more like the plot of a straight to TV movie.

You should get a copy of her friend Omid Scobies biography of her (harry was just a sideline). Even he couldn’t manage to gloss over some of the realities. He tried his best though. :hee:

[Kizzy]

They are a pair of self absorbed self pitying hypocrites.

They needed the millions to live the millionaires life style while claiming to know about real suffering.

Tell that to those on the streets or one pay check away from being on the streets they are absolute fake parasites living off the back of a royal heritage.
Every royal, duke and duchess are parasites. What makes these different is they are at least attempting to earn money rather than just being gifted it.

[thesheriff443]

Every royal, duke and duchess are parasites. What makes these different is they are at least attempting to earn money rather than just being gifted it.

Yes Harry took money from bankers who hold people to ransom while talking about his dead mother to people who couldn’t care less about his mother.

If he was not part of the royal family no one would be interested in that pair of no bodies.

They are not interested in poor minoraties, just using them as a platform to get companies interested in them.

How people can be sucked into their bollox is beyond me.

[rusticgal]

They are a pair of self absorbed self pitying hypocrites.

They needed the millions to live the millionaires life style while claiming to know about real suffering.

Tell that to those on the streets or one pay check away from being on the streets they are absolute fake parasites living off the back of a royal heritage.



That just about sums it up...

[rusticgal]

Every royal, duke and duchess are parasites.


Thats not true...many of them have a job in one form or another its just its not publicised.

[Kizzy]

Thats not true...many of them have a job in one form or another its just its not publicised.

If they recieve money from the public purse they don't earn they are parasitic imo.

[thesheriff443]

Netflix should of given the millions they gave to that pair of work shy cry babies to the people that actually need it and filmed Them.

[jet]

If they recieve money from the public purse they don't earn they are parasitic imo.

The Royals who receive taxpayers money work incredibly hard. Have you any idea what they do, day in day out, mostly without publicity and fanfare?

[jet]

Plough through this lot - (and in addition she has to study the background of the engagement, who the people are she will meet, memorise speeches, answer correspondence etc.)
All with 3 young children to be a mother to.

Duchess Kate - Official Engagements (2019)
Kate's current count is 120 engagements for 2019.

January (7)
(9th: Kate's 37th birthday)
Friday 10th
Received Sir Keith Mills, Chairman of the Royal Foundation
Tuesday 15th
Visit the King Henry’s Walk Community Garden in Islington.
Wednesday 16th
Visited the Costume Department at the Royal Opera House
Tuesday 22nd
Visit Family Action Lewisham, which provides support for children and families in South London, to launch 'FamilyLine', a national support line
Tuesday 29th
Officially opened the Victoria and Albert Museum Dundee
Give speech
With William
Met employees of the Dundee Michelin tyre factory and their families at the Crescent Community Centre
Attended a Meeting of the Michelin Dundee Action Group
With William
Wednesday 30th
Received Ms Lorraine Heggessey, Chief Executive of the Royal Foundation
February (12)
Tuesday 5th
Visit Lavender Primary School in support of Place2Be’s Children's Mental Health Week
Visit Alperton Community School to meet the UK’s first winner of the Varkey Foundation Global
Teacher Prize, Andria Zafirakou
Wednesday 6th
Host dinner at Buckingham Palace (Royal Foundation)
Sunday 10th
Attend the BAFTA Film Awards ceremony at the Royal Albert Hall
With William
Wednesday 13th
Attend The Royal Foundation’s ‘Mental Health in Education’ conference.
100 Women in Finance gala in aid Heads Together's ‘The Mentally Healthy Schools" program
Wednesday 27th - Belfast, Northern Ireland
Visit the Irish Football Association, at the National Football Stadium
Visit Extern at Roscor Youth Village
Attended a Reception at the Belfast Empire Music Hall
Tuesday 28th - Northern Ireland
Received representatives from the Police Service of Northern Ireland at Hillsborough Castle
Visited Cinemagic at Braid Museum and Arts Centre
Visited Sure Start at St Joseph’s Early Years Centre
March (15)
Tuesday 5th
Attend reception at Buckingham Palace for 50th anniversary of Prince Charles's investiture as Prince of Wales
Wednesday 6th - Blackpool
Attend roundtable briefing about the town’s recent history, the challenges, and the investment and regeneration efforts that are currently underway at Blackpool Tower
Walkabout on ‘Comedy Carpet’
With William
Visited two properties in Kirby Road to see the efforts being made to improve the quality of housing in the town
With William
Visit Blackpool Central Library to attend sessions on early childhood development
Visit Revoe Park, community garden and park
With William
Friday 8th
Received Lorraine Heggessey, Chief Executive of the Royal Foundation
With William
Monday 11th
Attend Commonwealth Day Ceremony
Tuesday 12th
Visit the Henry Fawcett Children’s Centre to see how Leap Lambeth are using the Parent and Infant Relationship Service (PAIRS) to support parents, carers and their children
Attend the 2019 National Portrait Gallery's Portrait Gala
Wednesday 13th
Held a trustees meeting for the Royal Foundation
With William
Sunday 17th
Attend Irish Guard's St. Patricks Day Parade
Hand out shamrocks
With William
Tuesday 19th
Attend opening of Bush House at King’s College London
With The Queen
Visit the Foundling Museum in London
Wednesday 27th
Received Sir Keith Mills, chairman of the Royal Foundation
Thursday 28th
Visit UK Scouting at Gilwell Park to learn more about the organization’s new pilot to bring Scouting to younger children.
April (3)
Thursday 25th
Attend Anzac Day Service at Westminister Abbey
Tuesday 30th
Visit Sayers Croft Wildlife Garden and Forest School at Paddington Recreation Ground
Hold a Reception at Kensington Palace for members of the Early Years Steering Group.
May (13)
Wednesday 1st
Officially open the new Centre of Excellence for Anna Freud National Centre
Tuesday 7th
Attend the launch of the King’s Cup Regatta at Cutty Sark
With William
Wednesday 8th
Visit Caernarfon Coastguard Search and Rescue Helicopter Base in Northern Wales
With William
Visit Halen Môn Anglesey Sea Salt shop
With William
Joined representatives from 1st Menai Bridge Scouts Group, Surfers Against Sewage, the Isle of Anglesey County Council and Natural Resource Wales for beach exploration and clean-up activities at Newborough Beach
With William
Tuesday 14th
Visit Bletchley Park to view a special D-Day exhibition in the newly restored Teleprinter Building
Wednesday 15th
Visited the Royal Horticultural Society Back to Nature Garden in the gardens of the Royal Hospital Chelsea
Friday 17th
Visited the Royal Horticultural Society Back to Nature Garden in the gardens of the Royal Hospital Chelsea
Saturday 18th
Visited the Royal Horticultural Society Back to Nature Garden in the gardens of the Royal Hospital Chelsea
Sunday 19th
Visited the Royal Horticultural Society Back to Nature Garden in the gardens of the Royal Hospital Chelsea
With William & kids
Monday 20th
Attend RHS Chelsea Flower Show Preview Day
Tuesday 21st
Attend the Queen's Garden Party at Buckingham Palace
Received by The Queen & invested with the Insignia of a Dame Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order.
June (10)
Monday 3rd
Attend US State Banquet at Buckingham Palace
Tuesday 4th
Received Sir Keith Mills, Chairman, and Ms. Lorraine Heggessey, Chief Executive of the Royal Foundation
Thursday 6th
Attended the Household Division's Beating Retreat at Horse Guards Parade
Took the salute
Saturday 8th
Attend Trooping the Colours
Tuesday 11th - Cumbria
Visit the Market Square of Keswick
Walkabout
Visit a traditional fell sheep farm
Wednesday 12th
Attended Gala Dinner for Action on Addiction
Monday 17th
Attend Order of the Garter Service
Tuesday 18th
Attend Royal Ascot
Present King's Stand Trophy
Tuesday 25th
Visited a photography workshop at Warren Park Children’s Centre (Action for Children & Royal Photographic Society)
July (4)
Monday 1st
Attend RHS Hampton Court Palace Garden Festival Preview Day
Tuesday 2nd
Attend Wimbledon tennis tournament
Meet with winners of LTA's Tennis Awards
Saturday 13th
Attend Wimbledon tennis tournament women's finals
With Meghan
Sunday 14th
Attend Wimbledon tennis tournament Men's Finals
With William
August (1)
Thursday 8th
Host the inaugural regatta The King’s Cup on the Isle of Wight
September (10)
Tuesday 10th
Opened the Back to Nature Garden & attended the Back to Nature Festival at Royal Horticultural Society Garden Wisley
Wednesday 11th
Received Mr Richard Curtis, Screenwriter and Director (Royal Foundation)
Friday 13th
Received Sir Keith Mills, Chairman of the Royal Foundation, and Ms Lorraine Heggessey, Chief Executive
With William
Wednesday 18th
Attended a Trustees’ Meeting for the Royal Foundation
Thursday 19th
Visited Family Nurse Partnership at Sunshine House Children and Young People's Development Centre
Friday 20th
Received Mr. Jason Knauf (Chief Executive of the Royal Foundation
Held an Early Years Meeting.
Tuesday 24th
Held a held an Early Years Initiatives Meeting at Kensington Palace
Wednesday 25th
Held a Reception at Kensington Palace
With William
Thursday 26th
Visit Birkenhead to attend the naming ceremony of the UK’s new polar research ship, the RRS Sir David Attenborough
With William
October (24)
Tuesday 1st
Held a Reception and Meeting for the Royal Foundation
With William
Held a Reception for the finalists of BBC Radio One’s Teen Hero Awards
With William
Wednesday 2nd
Visited the Aga Khan Centre in London
Met with The Aga Khan and the High Commissioner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Received Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan at Kensington Palace
Tuesday 8th


Received Bill Gates, Co-Chairman and Trustee of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Wednesday 9th
Visited the Angela Marmot Centre for Biodiversity at the Natural History Museum
meeting with Sir Michael Dixon, Chief Executive
Friday 11th
Held a meeting for the Royal Foundation
Monday 14th: Flew to Pakistan )
Tuesday 15th - Pakistan
Visited Islamabad Model College for Girls
Visited the Margalla Hills
Called upon The President of Pakistan and Mrs. Arif Alvi
Called upon Mr. Imran Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan
Attended a Reception at the Pakistan Monument given by the High Commissioner to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, His Excellency Mr. Thomas Drew
Wednesday 16th - Pakistan
Visited a glacier in Broghil National Park
Visited a flood site to learn of the impacts of climate change in Bumburet
Viewed a first aid drill
Visited the Kalash Minority Village in Bumburet
Received the Chief of Army Staff (General Qamar Javed Bajwa) and Mrs. Qamar Bajwa at the Residence of the British High Commissioner in Islamabad
Thursday 17th - Pakistan
Attended a Meeting with the Governor of Punjab, Chaudhry Muhammad Sarwar, and Chief Minister of Punjab, Sardar Usman Buzdar, at Lahore Airport
Visited the SOS Children's Village
Visited the National Cricket Academy
Visited the Badshahi Mosque
Attended a Meeting with Faith Leaders
Visited Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre
Friday 18th - Pakistan
Held an Investiture at the Residence in Islamabad
Visited the SOS Children's Village
Visited the Army Canine Centre
November (15)
Tuesday 5th
Held an Early Years Meeting (Royal Foundation)
Wednesday 6th
Received Ms. Lorraine Heggessey upon relinquishing her appointment as Chief Executive of the Royal Foundation
With William
Thursday 7th
Attend the launch of the National Emergencies Trust at St. Martin-in-the-Fields
With William
Attended a meeting with the BBC Children's and Education's team at Old Broadcasting House
Meet with the Lord Hall of Birkenhead (Director General, the British Broadcasting Corporation)
Saturday 9th
Attend Festival of Remembrance at Royal Albert Hall
Sunday 10th
Attend Remembrance Day Service at the Cenotaph
Tuesday 12th
Attended Shout's Crisis Volunteer Workshop
Wednesday 13th
Visited the Brink (Action on Addiction)
Friday 15th
Visit the charity’s new hospice ‘The Nook’ to meet children and families being supported by EACH, tour the hospice, and officially open the building
Meet with Mr. Graham Butland upon relinquishing his appointment as Chief Executive
Monday 18th
Attend the Royal Variety Performance at the Palladium Theatre
With William
Wednesday 20th
Meet with the King and Queen of Bhutan
With William
Held an Early Years Meeting at Kensington Palace for the Royal Foundation
Received representatives from the midwife profession

Thursday 21st
Received Tusk Conservation Award winners at Kensington Palace
Attend Tusk Trust Awards at the Empire Theatre
Friday 22nd
Received Sir Keith Mills (Chairman) and Mr Jason Knauf (Chief Executive)
(26th-27th: Two Day of research and training with Kingston Hospital Maternity Unit in London.)
December (6)
Tuesday 3rd
Attend NATO Reception
Wednesday 4th
visited Peterley Manor Farm, Peterley Lane, Prestwood, Great Missenden, and was received by Her Majesty's Lord-Lieutenant of Buckinghamshire
Tuesday 10th
Attended a Trustees' Meeting for the Royal Foundation
Held a Reception at Buckingham Palace for charities and organizations that support Prince William & Duchess Kate's work.
Wednesday 11th
Held an Early Years Meeting
Attend Diplomatic Reception at Buckingham Palace

Labels: Court Circular, Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, Official engagements, Royal, Royal Duties
.................................................. ..........

[jet]

Thats not true...many of them have a job in one form or another its just its not publicised.

Yes, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie for example don't receive any public money and have their own jobs. The taxpayer doesn't pay for their security either.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Kate, the actual proper princess

:clap1:

[Kizzy]

The Royals who receive taxpayers money work incredibly hard. Have you any idea what they do, day in day out, mostly without publicity and fanfare?

No I don't... tell me what they do to live in the estates they live in the homes, the cars, the staff, the land..Tell me, what do they do? I'm very interested.

[jet]

No I don't... tell me what they do to live in the estates they live in the homes, the cars, the staff, the land..Tell me, what do they do? I'm very interested.

See Kates yearly engagements above.
Tell me, what do Meghan and Harry do to live in a massive LA mansion with 16 bathrooms? What did they do to get a megabuck Netflix deal?
Not a thing - they left the daily slog of the royals to 'make their own way' then used their royal status to get a job which they have no experience in and which others will mainly do for them. Netflix bought their 'name', not their 'work'.

[thesheriff443]

See Kates yearly engagements above.
Tell me, what do Meghan and Harry do to live in a massive LA mansion with 16 bathrooms? What did they do to get a megabuck Netflix deal?
Not a thing - they left the daily slog of the royals to 'make their own way' then used their royal status to get a job which they have no experience in and which others will mainly do for them. Netflix bought their 'name', not their 'work'.

Great post.

[thesheriff443]

It’s why people copy write there names and businesses to stop people using there name to make money.

That’s why the queen made them drop royal from their bollox

[Kizzy]

See Kates yearly engagements above.
Tell me, what do Meghan and Harry do to live in a massive LA mansion with 16 bathrooms? What did they do to get a megabuck Netflix deal?
Not a thing - they left the daily slog of the royals to 'make their own way' then used their royal status to get a job which they have no experience in and which others will mainly do for them. Netflix bought their 'name', not their 'work'.

Kate had 6 engagements in January... daily slog? :laugh:

[user104658]

Imagine that, in your place of work, there arrives a new lower ranked and much less experienced ‘executive’, newly married to the bosses son.

Uncaring of what the boss or anyone might think, she states that she is going to modernize the firm she has just joined. :eek:

She then goes on to ignore the rules of the particular workplace. She makes those in lower positions than herself cry with her demands and attitude.They then leave because they can’t work with her.



She is jealous of your higher position, gained by many many years of hard work, loyalty and scrutiny; she feels she should be on a par with you.

She gets fed up with people bad mouthing her moves, so decides the job isn’t for her after all.

So she writes out her resignation, stating that she expects the firm to still pay part of her salary, retain her company car and all the other perks even though she won’t be working for it anymore. :crazy:

Off she goes, taking the hapless bosses son with her.

That person sounds just like Meghan. :fan:Imagine that someone would describe marrying into a family in terms of "being a new low-ranker in a place of work" and new in laws as "boss executives".

At least I'm starting to understand your mindset when it comes to the Megan stuff. Pieces starting to fit together.

[Kizzy]

It’s why people copy write there names and businesses to stop people using there name to make money.

That’s why the queen made them drop royal from their bollox

He is still a prince however.. he is royal. It's not like he's some nobody who decided to stick HRH on stuff. Oh well doesn't look like it phased them much.

[thesheriff443]

He is still a prince however.. he is royal. It's not like he's some nobody who decided to stick HRH on stuff. Oh well doesn't look like it phased them much.

And why do you think he got the Netflix deal?

It’s on the back of his name, nobody would give him a deal like that if was not for his name and Meghan would not be getting a deals if she had not married him.

They don’t care about poor minority’s they have jumped on the bandwagon using other people’s suffering to feather their own nest.

[thesheriff443]

Why do large firms and corporations pay millions to celebrities and sports stars to plug their goods or services?

Because they sell more using these people.

[thesheriff443]

Imagine that someone would describe marrying into a family in terms of "being a new low-ranker in a place of work" and new in laws as "boss executives".

At least I'm starting to understand your mindset when it comes to the Megan stuff. Pieces starting to fit together.

When you marry into the royal family you are not marrying into a normal family.

There where clear expectations of what it involved.

And yes it is about pecking order and Meghan was not going to be top dog.

The queen is the boss and everyone one else has a role to play.

[Kizzy]

When you marry into the royal family you are not marrying into a normal family.

There where clear expectations of what it involved.

And yes it is about pecking order and Meghan was not going to be top dog.

The queen is the boss and everyone one else has a role to play.
Oh yes... I know.

Let's focus on another 'breakaway'

Nice to see the brothers united in this whatever else they appear divided on.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/a33831533/princess-diana-statue-prince-william-harry-statement/

[user104658]

When you marry into the royal family you are not marrying into a normal family.



There where clear expectations of what it involved.



And yes it is about pecking order and Meghan was not going to be top dog.



The queen is the boss and everyone one else has a role to play.

Right, and Harry himself has made it very clear that he (as an individual) does not like and does not want that sort of family life, and so has taken steps to move away from the Royal Tribe. I think it's quite insulting to his intelligence to suggest that he didn't know he had chosen to marry a partner who didn't "fit the mould" and there's plenty of pre-Megan evidence that he's always been a square peg in a round hole in the Royal family.

So what you're describing isn't a "job environment" at all, because if you don't like your job and the corporate structure, you're free to leave that job and find another path without being vilified for it. Apparently, the Royal Family is a job that you have to accept, politely, and never dare try to quit?

And people are suggesting this is a good thing?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pull the plug on glittering Invictus Games
fundraiser for wounded soldiers due to be shown on Amazon after signing
£112million deal with rivals Netflix


The music and comedy show was set to be held in California next summer
Organisers hoped event would raise £1 million for Invictus Games Foundation
Officials were reportedly 'stunned' after being informed of the cancellation


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8702907/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-pull-plug-glittering-Invictus-Games-fundraiser.html

not looking good in the comments..

[user104658]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8702907/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-pull-plug-glittering-Invictus-Games-fundraiser.html



not looking good in the comments..

Probably because its the Daily Mail and their commenters have significantly impaired reading comprehension;

"According to an Invictus spokesperson, the event was 'shelved' due to the Covid-19 pandemic and was a decision independent of the Netflix deal being signed.

The event was shelved because the primary revenue generator was ticket sales from a live concert in Los Angeles in the spring of 2021.

'Given current circumstances with Covid, the event needed to be reconceptualised.

'This was an independent decision made prior to a partnership with Netflix. The duke remains committed as ever to the Invictus Games.'

The 2020 Invictus Games which was due to be held in April were called off because of the coronavirus pandemic."


Perhaps you also skipped half the article and went straight to the toxic chav comments, LT?

[Swan]

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle pull the plug on glittering Invictus Games
fundraiser for wounded soldiers due to be shown on Amazon after signing
£112million deal with rivals Netflix


The music and comedy show was set to be held in California next summer
Organisers hoped event would raise £1 million for Invictus Games Foundation
Officials were reportedly 'stunned' after being informed of the cancellation


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8702907/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-pull-plug-glittering-Invictus-Games-fundraiser.html

not looking good in the comments..

The People's Prince and Princess :wavey:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Officials at the foundation were reportedly ‘stunned’ after a lawyer for the Sussexes informed them they would not be going ahead with the event last week, shortly before the Netflix deal was announced.

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a ‘conflict’ of plans with another streaming service.

A source involved in the planning of the event told the publication: ‘It’s very bad form and everyone at Invictus is gutted.

[jet]

Officials at the foundation were reportedly ‘stunned’ after a lawyer for the Sussexes informed them they would not be going ahead with the event last week, shortly before the Netflix deal was announced.

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a ‘conflict’ of plans with another streaming service.

A source involved in the planning of the event told the publication: ‘It’s very bad form and everyone at Invictus is gutted.

Yes, the Invictus games event was to be shown on Amazon - hence the conflict of interest. Harry created the Invictus games and always said it was his most important project. I guess making big money is more important now.

[Beso]

See Kates yearly engagements above.
Tell me, what do Meghan and Harry do to live in a massive LA mansion with 16 bathrooms? What did they do to get a megabuck Netflix deal?
Not a thing - they left the daily slog of the royals to 'make their own way' then used their royal status to get a job which they have no experience in and which others will mainly do for them. Netflix bought their 'name', not their 'work'.

They should use that money to pay off the loan they got off the public to do up goose step cottage or whatever its called in one go, rather than the poultry yearly amount they promised...I mean I know the public purse dont need the money during this pandemic or anything but fairs fair.

[jet]

Right, and Harry himself has made it very clear that he (as an individual) does not like and does not want that sort of family life, and so has taken steps to move away from the Royal Tribe. I think it's quite insulting to his intelligence to suggest that he didn't know he had chosen to marry a partner who didn't "fit the mould" and there's plenty of pre-Megan evidence that he's always been a square peg in a round hole in the Royal family.

So what you're describing isn't a "job environment" at all, because if you don't like your job and the corporate structure, you're free to leave that job and find another path without being vilified for it. Apparently, the Royal Family is a job that you have to accept, politely, and never dare try to quit?

And people are suggesting this is a good thing?

The Queen offered Meghan the chance not to do the job from the off, and she didn't take it.
Of course you can quit but you shouldn't expect to still be paid by Daddy, to have the same tax funded security, to have the perks without the graft....and that is what they demanded at the start of their departure in their 'leaving' announcement they posted on their Instagram page, without informing the Queen or palace first, there for all to see - to their astonishment.

Of course you can quit, but its not the quitting, its the WAY you go about it and how you conduct yourself afterwards....and its been one long litany of self - interest, selfishness, bad decisions, untruths, hypocrisy, tackiness, airing their dirty laundry, me me me whine whine whine ever since.

[Marsh.]

Yes, the Invictus games event was to be shown on Amazon - hence the conflict of interest. Harry created the Invictus games and always said it was his most important project. I guess making big money is more important now.

Did you actually read the article?

It hasn't gone ahead because of coronavirus and Harry is still attached to it.

[The Slim Reaper]

Yes, the Invictus games event was to be shown on Amazon - hence the conflict of interest. Harry created the Invictus games and always said it was his most important project. I guess making big money is more important now.

Supporting your family will and should always be the most important thing.

[jet]

Probably because its the Daily Mail and their commenters have significantly impaired reading comprehension;

"According to an Invictus spokesperson, the event was 'shelved' due to the Covid-19 pandemic and was a decision independent of the Netflix deal being signed.

The event was shelved because the primary revenue generator was ticket sales from a live concert in Los Angeles in the spring of 2021.

'Given current circumstances with Covid, the event needed to be reconceptualised.

'This was an independent decision made prior to a partnership with Netflix. The duke remains committed as ever to the Invictus Games.'

The 2020 Invictus Games which was due to be held in April were called off because of the coronavirus pandemic."


Perhaps you also skipped half the article and went straight to the toxic chav comments, LT?

Very insulting TS, given the first half of the article is centred around -
According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.


Which I read elsewhere as the reason, and the conflict was with Amazon.

The next half cites coronavirus, according to an Invictus spokesperson, as the reason.
So we don't know for sure which is correct.

How come you skipped the first half? Reading comprehension problem? :nono:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Very insulting TS, given the first half of the article is centred around -


Which I read elsewhere as the reason, and the conflict was with Amazon.

The next half cites coronavirus as the reason.
So we don't know for sure which is correct.

How come you skipped the first half? Reading comprehension problem? :nono:
The quote TS used is PR statement from INvictus (ie bollox)

the Sunday Times got to the actual story

Officials at the foundation were reportedly 'stunned' after a lawyer for the Sussexes informed them they would not be going ahead with the event last week, shortly before the Netflix deal was announced.

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.

A source involved in the planning of the event told the publication: 'It's very bad form and everyone at Invictus is gutted.

-----------------


then we get the PR stuff trying to save face


--------------------------

Its ANOTHER PR DISasTER for this couple

:facepalm:

[thesheriff443]

Right, and Harry himself has made it very clear that he (as an individual) does not like and does not want that sort of family life, and so has taken steps to move away from the Royal Tribe. I think it's quite insulting to his intelligence to suggest that he didn't know he had chosen to marry a partner who didn't "fit the mould" and there's plenty of pre-Megan evidence that he's always been a square peg in a round hole in the Royal family.

So what you're describing isn't a "job environment" at all, because if you don't like your job and the corporate structure, you're free to leave that job and find another path without being vilified for it. Apparently, the Royal Family is a job that you have to accept, politely, and never dare try to quit?

And people are suggesting this is a good thing?

If he didn’t want that for himself and his wife he should of left before getting the tax payer to pay something like 6 million for his wedding and invite lots of a list celebrities to it.

Oh and look they went to those same celebrities to get help in the form of private jets and free accommodation in mansions.


They used the he tax payers money and his royal heritage to set themselves up in their new life you know the private life they said they wanted for them selves and son.

They then jumped on their he racial bandwagon because the queen saw right thru them wanting to us the royal branding to live on while condemning the royals

[Marsh.]

If he didn’t want that for himself and his wife he should of left before getting the tax payer to pay something like 6 million for his wedding and invite lots of a list celebrities to it.

Oh and look they went to those same celebrities to get help in the form of private jets and free accommodation in mansions.


They used the he tax payers money and his royal heritage to set themselves up in their new life you know the private life they said they wanted for them selves and son.

They then jumped on their he racial bandwagon because the queen saw right thru them wanting to us the royal branding to live on while condemning the royals

Lots of whining about people you don't know.

[jet]

The quote TS used is PR statement from INvictus (ie bollox)

the Sunday Times got to the actual story

Officials at the foundation were reportedly 'stunned' after a lawyer for the Sussexes informed them they would not be going ahead with the event last week, shortly before the Netflix deal was announced.

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.

A source involved in the planning of the event told the publication: 'It's very bad form and everyone at Invictus is gutted.

-----------------


then we get the PR stuff trying to save face


--------------------------

Its ANOTHER PR DISasTER for this couple

:facepalm:

Given their track record, it fits.

[Beso]

Lots of whining about people you don't know.

On tibb off all places :joker:

[jet]

And now he's apparently going to do a Netflix docu on Diana's life. Making money off his late mother again. Dear Lord, hope this isn't true.

[Marsh.]

And now he's apparently going to do a Netflix docu on Diana's life. Making money off his late mother again. Dear Lord, hope this isn't true.

A documentary about their mother? Well, the Royals have NEVER done that before. :shocked:

[Crimson Dynamo]

And now he's apparently going to do a Netflix docu on Diana's life. Making money off his late mother again. Dear Lord, hope this isn't true.

No doubt dishing out blame right left and centre and then saying see the meedja killed me mam that is why we have to live in a big manshun in LA

wont someone think of the children???:bawling::bawling::bawling:

[jet]

If he didn’t want that for himself and his wife he should of left before getting the tax payer to pay something like 6 million for his wedding and invite lots of a list celebrities to it.

Oh and look they went to those same celebrities to get help in the form of private jets and free accommodation in mansions.


They used the he tax payers money and his royal heritage to set themselves up in their new life you know the private life they said they wanted for them selves and son.

They then jumped on their he racial bandwagon because the queen saw right thru them wanting to us the royal branding to live on while condemning the royals

Spot on!

[thesheriff443]

Lots of whining about people you don't know.

You don’t know them and you don’t know me.

Try giving an opinion on the thread topic not the people in it.

[rusticgal]

Lots of whining about people you don't know.


You dont have to know people personally to have an opinion ffs...

[Swan]

You dont have to know people personally to have an opinion ffs...

I mean more than half this forum is about having opinions on people we don't know personally :joker:

When BB was in full swing - 'how dare you have an opinion on a hm you don't know personally'

In that case, what's the point of any forum, ever? lol

[Marsh.]

You dont have to know people personally to have an opinion ffs...

To... have an opinion on them as people... yes you kind of do.

Making assumptions about who strangers may be based on tabloids is foolish.



ffs

[Marsh.]

I mean more than half this forum is about having opinions on people we don't know personally :joker:

When BB was in full swing - 'how dare you have an opinion on a hm you don't know personally'

In that case, what's the point of any forum, ever? lol

Having an opinion on a BB housemate.... doing something in BB is not the same.
But you know that.

[Swan]

Having an opinion on a BB housemate.... doing something in BB is not the same.
But you know that.

So to be clear, no one should have an opinion on someone they don't know personally? Be that a politician, a royal, a celeb, a terrorist etc? Ok :)

[rusticgal]

To... have an opinion on them as people... yes you kind of do.




So you never commented on the BB forum and posted comments about housemates....:joker:

[rusticgal]

Having an opinion on a BB housemate.... doing something in BB is not the same.
But you know that.


But you dont know them :shrug:...you are judging them on what you see..you know the edited clips...no difference what so ever.

[rusticgal]

So to be clear, no one should have an opinion on someone they don't know personally? Be that a politician, a royal, a celeb, a terrorist etc? Ok :)


:laugh:

[LukeB]

To... have an opinion on them as people... yes you kind of do.

Making assumptions about who strangers may be based on tabloids is foolish.



ffs

Exactly but anything to keep up the obsession with Meghan and harry. You would think after the toxic hate people give they would be tired of it by now and move on but it lives on.

[Swan]

We form opinions based on people's actions in the public eye. This is nothing new, but Harry and Megan should be immune to this because?

[Marsh.]

So to be clear, no one should have an opinion on someone they don't know personally? Be that a politician, a royal, a celeb, a terrorist etc? Ok :)

If you're not going to read a post, don't bother replying to it. x :)

If you have an opinion on a politician's politics, great. A Royal's royal duties, great.
A terrorists actions, great.

Commenting on a "celeb" or otherwise whose personal life you have no idea of? Foolish.

People commenting like they know Harry and Meghan personally is laughable. The comments about Harry not realising his own wife doesn't love him will be along in a minute.

[rusticgal]

Making assumptions about who strangers may be based on tabloids is foolish.






Its not all about the tabloids though...their documentry about the poor women in South Africa that they used as a platform to make it all about them spoke volumes...

[Swan]

Exactly but anything to keep up the obsession with Meghan and harry. You would think after the toxic hate people give they would be tired of it by now and move on but it lives on.

And so does their now, almost hilarious, hypocrisy.

[Liam-]

The difference being, people are forming opinions of Meghan and Harry on gossip they read in newspapers, if anyone can name one actual thing they’ve done wrong that we’ve seen for ourselves, it might be a tad different

[Marsh.]

But you dont know them :shrug:...you are judging them on what you see..you know the edited clips...no difference what so ever.

A lot of difference. Just because you want to defend making personal comments about Harry and Meghan doesn't change it.

An opinion on who was right or wrong in an argument over cider on Big Brother is vastly different to assuming you know what a housemate is like as a parent in the real world for example.

[Marsh.]

Its not all about the tabloids though...their documentry about the poor women in South Africa that they used as a platform to make it all about them spoke volumes...

If the comments were restricted to what she did in a documentary that would be fair enough.

It's not. It starts to veer off into the fantasy story writing of what she said to Harry off camera and how she controls him and everyone around her.

The entire media backlash she received was based on gossip about what she'd done "behind closed doors" conveniently enough.

[Swan]

They're celebs in the public eye, some will like them, some wont. Their situation is far from revolutionary. When you're in the public eye (which obviously they're dong their best to avoid lol) scrutiny comes with the territory.

[rusticgal]

People commenting like they know Harry and Meghan personally is laughable. .


:sleep:

[rusticgal]

The difference being, people are forming opinions of Meghan and Harry on gossip they read in newspapers, if anyone can name one actual thing they’ve done wrong that we’ve seen for ourselves, it might be a tad different


So did you not think the Documentary they made about the the atrocities in SA was fitting for them to sabotage it and make it all about them?

[Marsh.]

They're celebs in the public eye, some will like them, some wont. Their situation is far from revolutionary. When you're in the public eye (which obviously they're dong their best to avoid lol) scrutiny comes with the territory.

That doesn't relate to anything I've said.

[Marsh.]

They are no different from anyone else....put yourself out there then expect people to have opinions.

That's fine, comment on what you see. But, again, make up fairy stories about what people think is happening behind closed doors then your "opinion" becomes laughable.

[Marsh.]

:sleep:

Yes, it is very boring.

[Kizzy]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?

[Marsh.]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?

Yep, very astounding.

[Swan]

People have an opinion of celebs in the public eye, shocking!

[Crimson Dynamo]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?

That isn't true

[rusticgal]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?


Make a thread and debate them...but this thread is about Harry and Meghan.

[Kizzy]

That isn't true

Funny how all the bad press surrounding trump and bojo isn't true...but when there's a load of tosh posted about harry and Meghan it's gospel :/

[jet]

People have an opinion of celebs in the public eye, shocking!

But....but...not when its Meghan and Harry! :bawling:

Listen up folks.... make sure you only form an opinion about what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears from now on concerning the lovely Sussex’es.
No Con papers!
No Channel 5 documentaries!
No biographies!
No royal editors!
No royal correspondents!
No News channels!
Stay away from the evil because you might be tempted to decide what seems likely and whats not, come to your own conclusions you gullible thicko's and horror of horrors, POST about it!

Do this instead:
Use your eyes to see them presenting themselves in the best light when appearing in public!
Use your ears to hear them saying things in public they want you to hear!

This is a dictatorship! Freedom of speech is not on if I don't agree!
This is the criteria from now on!
This isn’t a discussion forum you know, you fools!
:hehe:

[jet]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?

I think it could be called an interesting enough diversion. :whistle: You seem to assume that what all people worry and really care about in their real lives are what they choose to post about on a forum. Nope.

[thesheriff443]

It’s utterly ridiculous to think you need to know someone personally to have an opinion on them.

Because if that where true those saying it, can’t have an opinion on any one or anything they don’t personally know.

The weakest argument in the history of the world.

[thesheriff443]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?

Well your in these threads giving your two cents and defending them while the world is turning so what does it mean.

It’s astounding that you can’t see that you think when you talk about them its acceptable but if any one else talks about them it’s not.

[Kizzy]

I haven't made any presumptions as to their motives for any actions have I?...
All I highlighted is the reluctance to believe bad press about some people but swallow every word about others, that astounds me .
Have an opinion, that's not a problem, it's when entire imagined scenarios are played out as actual events it gets a tad worrying.

[bots]

no one person ever controls the narrative, if people want to debate things that others feel are trivial, that is their right. No-one decides what is worth discussion and what is not

[thesheriff443]

People are more than happy to hear opinions if it’s the same as theirs just remember it’s a big brother forum not the United Nations

[Ammi]

no one person ever controls the narrative, if people want to debate things that others feel are trivial, that is their right. No-one decides what is worth discussion and what is not

..on the ‘guest viewing’ bit...I’ve often seen guests viewing threads like ‘on bit in the slide tonight’...etc...I see you controlled those threads quite nicely...


...obviously might have been bit on the side, though...but hmmmm...:suspectsmiley:....

[Crimson Dynamo]

It's astounding to me that the most questionable people are currently in power that have made catastrophic decisions and shocking statements in recent times and the focus for some is the Queens grandson and his missus?

well the focus in a thread about them is on them

people can analyse more than one subject, we have threads on governments and elections too


:spin:

[rusticgal]

But....but...not when its Meghan and Harry! :bawling:

Listen up folks.... make sure you only form an opinion about what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears from now on concerning the lovely Sussex’es.
No Con papers!
No Channel 5 documentaries!
No biographies!
No royal editors!
No royal correspondents!
No News channels!
Stay away from the evil because you might be tempted to decide what seems likely and whats not, come to your own conclusions you gullible thicko's and horror of horrors, POST about it!

Do this instead:
Use your eyes to see them presenting themselves in the best light when appearing in public!
Use your ears to hear them saying things in public they want you to hear!

This is a dictatorship! Freedom of speech is not on if I don't agree!
This is the criteria from now on!
This isn’t a discussion forum you know, you fools!
:hehe:


:joker::joker::joker:

[AnnieK]

They should use that money to pay off the loan they got off the public to do up goose step cottage or whatever its called in one go, rather than the poultry yearly amount they promised...I mean I know the public purse dont need the money during this pandemic or anything but fairs fair.

Its being reported everywhere today that they have repaid the loan and Charles is no longer funding them. Hopefully, that will help pave the way for people to stop being quite so critical of their every move.

[Marsh.]

But....but...not when its Meghan and Harry! :bawling:

Listen up folks.... make sure you only form an opinion about what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears from now on concerning the lovely Sussex’es.
No Con papers!
No Channel 5 documentaries!
No biographies!
No royal editors!
No royal correspondents!
No News channels!
Stay away from the evil because you might be tempted to decide what seems likely and whats not, come to your own conclusions you gullible thicko's and horror of horrors, POST about it!

Do this instead:
Use your eyes to see them presenting themselves in the best light when appearing in public!
Use your ears to hear them saying things in public they want you to hear!

This is a dictatorship! Freedom of speech is not on if I don't agree!
This is the criteria from now on!
This isn’t a discussion forum you know, you fools!
:hehe:

Except you never reference any of the things you list.

Daily Mail is the limit of your research.

[Marsh.]

It’s utterly ridiculous to think you need to know someone personally to have an opinion on them.

Because if that where true those saying it, can’t have an opinion on any one or anything they don’t personally know.

The weakest argument in the history of the world.

When you purposely misunderstand what's actually been said I can see how you come to that conclusion.

It certainly explains your opinion on H&M also being full of make believe to justify whatever it is you're saying.

[Liam-]

Its being reported everywhere today that they have repaid the loan and Charles is no longer funding them. Hopefully, that will help pave the way for people to stop being quite so critical of their every move.

People will always find other reasons to justify their hatred

[Crimson Dynamo]

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pay back Sovereign Grant money, as they seek to remove 'public interest' in their new lives

-----------------------------------------

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's £112m Netflix deal 'could include a documentary on Princess Diana

-----------------------------------------

:laugh2:

[Swan]

Why are they any different to anyone else in the public eye though? Being critical of public figures is a perfectly natural human trait. We form judgements on what we see/read. They are certainly not being singled out, like some people would have you believe.

[Marsh.]

Why are they any different to anyone else in the public eye though? Being critical of public figures is a perfectly natural human trait. We form judgements on what we see/read. They are certainly not being singled out, like some people would have you believe.

That's fine. But making out someone's invented perception of a person's life behind closed doors is factual based on articles in the Daily Mail is laughable. That is the type of thing I am referring to.

The people who talk about "Poor Harry" who doesn't realise Meghan doesn't love him and makes no decisions of his own. An observation anybody who doesn't know them personally could not possibly make.

[Swan]

That's fine. But making out someone's invented perception of a person's life behind closed doors is factual based on articles in the Daily Mail is laughable. That is the type of thing I am referring to.

The people who talk about "Poor Harry" who doesn't realise Meghan doesn't love him and makes no decisions of his own. An observation anybody who doesn't know them personally could not possibly make.

Are people saying that though? I mean they look as in love as any other celeb couple in the press. Harry is used to a highly privileged way of living, it's not like he's using these private jets and so on because of her, he'd always use them. Im against them because of their blatant hypocrisy. I have no actual hatred for them i just simply don't really like them from what i've seen/read.

[Marsh.]

Are people saying that though? I

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

[Swan]

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

But it's not like women wouldn't be queuing up for him, he's a wealthy Prince, he'll never be stuck for takers. I think they're both as bad as each other. However, i don't buy the 'poor harry' argument.

[Marsh.]

But it's not like women wouldn't be queuing up for him, he's a wealthy Prince, he'll never be stuck for takers. I think they're both as bad as each other. However, i don't buy the 'poor harry' argument.

No. Me neither.

[Beso]

Yep. It's been said several times. Everytime a thread on them is made we get the "poor manipulated Harry" routine.

Is that the royal we?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Is that the royal we?

:joker:

[jet]

Meghan and Harry’s Netflix plans brutally dismissed in poll ‘sooner watch paint dry!'
BRITONS have no interest in tuning in to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's new Netflix TV shows, according recent polling.
By EMILY FERGUSON

The survey, carried out from 1pm-10pm on September 3 on Express.co.uk, asked: “Will you watch Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s new Netflix shows?”

The vast majority of respondents, 95 percent (8,229 people) voted “no”, with just five percent (318 people) saying “yes”.

Less than one percent of the 8,649 respondents, 102 people, opted for “don’t know”.

The findings of the poll were also backed by a YouGov poll, which found a similar result.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1331144/meghan-markle-prince-harry-netflix-deal-tv-show-documentary-poll
.................................................. ...........

Oops....:hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Omg :joker:

[jet]

Omg :joker:

:hehe:

Royal POLL: Should the Queen remove Meghan and Harry’s royal titles over Netflix deal?

MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry made a bombshell announcement this week they had signed a multi-year deal with Netflix to make a range of programmes for the streaming giant, which has sparked renewed calls for the couple to stop using their Duke and Duchess titles while pursuing commercial ventures. Should the Queen remove Meghan and Harry's royal titles over Netflix deal? Vote in Express.co.uk's poll.
By RACHEL RUSSELL

Our exclusive poll found a staggering 96 percent (9,335 people) thought the couple should be stripped of their Duke and Duchess titles as a result of their newly-signed agreement with the streaming giant.

Just four percent (408 people) thought Meghan and Harry deserved to keep their titles even though they were pursuing commercial ventures while 76 people said they didn't know.

A total of 9,819 readers took part in the online survey which ran between 3pm and 9pm on Saturday.

[Beso]

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pay back Sovereign Grant money, as they seek to remove 'public interest' in their new lives

-----------------------------------------

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's £112m Netflix deal 'could include a documentary on Princess Diana

-----------------------------------------

:laugh2:




Receipts please....

[Beso]

Kings and queens of making the beckhams look normal.

[jet]

Its being reported everywhere today that they have repaid the loan and Charles is no longer funding them. Hopefully, that will help pave the way for people to stop being quite so critical of their every move.

They were under big pressure to repay it....


Confirmation of the £2.4m payment comes after significant pressure following news of their Netflix deal.


Speaking this weekend, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, deputy chair of parliament's public accounts committee, told the Telegraph: "Clearly anyone who has borrowed taxpayers' cash needs to pay it back as quickly as possible. £2.4million is a lot and even if you paid back £250,000 a year it would still take a decade."

Bim Afolami, a former member of the committee, which scrutinises public spending, agreed, saying: "If the Royal family wants to subsidise Harry and Meghan that's fine but the state should not pay for that. They need to pay the money back now."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2020/09/07/revealed-prince-harry-meghan-have-paid-back-24m-frogmore-cottage/

[Beso]

It was paid into the sovereign grant.

[Swan]

The Prince and Princess will don't deserve, literally :joker:

[arista]

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/Njh0lsZpGYEgBFEvjB-o4w/https/media.fyre.co/UTrNC9SCGd6MY2fFF29Q_0809%20Star.JPG

[arista]

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/rwcvLR1lq1NsLOfj-8R1jQ/https/media.fyre.co/uqChXGd1Qv6UFolBNQaf_0809%20Metro.JPG

[arista]

https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/Ku4_kkFjIgATtk2HTuNY4Q/https/media.fyre.co/7jPfNyrwTqW648YtRJfA_0809%20Mail.JPG

[Marsh.]

Yes, the Daily Star caused it. :umm2:



:laugh2:

[user104658]

People must be gutted that they can no longer croak "Frogmore" during their daily Harry and Megan bile-spew. I do feel some empathy for them so I will throw them a bone;

What about interest?? Normal people would pay INTEREST on a loan like that. They didn't pay any interest who do they think they are??? Some sort of lah-di-dah better than you non-interest-payers? Now we demand; pay interest for each year of Frogmore loan!!!

[Beso]

Yes, the Daily Star caused it. :umm2:



:laugh2:

It was me actually..2 pages ago.:smug:

[Beso]

People must be gutted that they can no longer croak "Frogmore" during their daily Harry and Megan bile-spew. I do feel some empathy for them so I will throw them a bone;

What about interest?? Normal people would pay INTEREST on a loan like that. They didn't pay any interest who do they think they are??? Some sort of lah-di-dah better than you non-interest-payers? Now we demand; pay interest for each year of Frogmore loan!!!

They ain't really paid us back at all, the money was paid into the soviergn grant which the queen and the rest lap up on dinner functions and soft bog roll.

[Marsh.]

They ain't really paid us back at all, the money was paid into the soviergn grant which the queen and the rest lap up on dinner functions and soft bog roll.

Which makes the backlash against Harry and his wife even more laughable.

"Come and be fodder for our tabloids and you can fill your pockets!!!"

[rusticgal]

Good....they just need their titles taken off them now then the mission is complete :laugh:

[user104658]

Good....they just need their titles taken off them now then the mission is complete :laugh:

Not likely - the family doesn't seem to harbour anything like the same resentment for them that the slobbering public does, despite the fairytales the tabloids like to peddle about it.

[Marsh.]

"Mission"

Yikes. Imagine if being Royal actually meant anything in this day and age. They'd be lynched. :worry:

[jet]

Not likely - the family doesn't seem to harbour anything like the same resentment for them that the slobbering public does, despite the fairytales the tabloids like to peddle about it.

Seems like you think the ‘slobbering public’, as you disdainfully call them, all go by what are often sensational headlines on the front of papers and never open one.
Inside papers like the Express, Times, DM, Telegraph for example, there are articles written by reliable sources that have known the royals for years and whose job it is to ferret out the truth from the nonsense. Many of these Royal experts, correspondents and royal reporters have known Harry since he was a little boy, have accompanied him on tours all over the world, have drank with him at the end of the day in bars, when he let his hair down.
There are his Royal biographers like Penny Junor who have interviewed him in depth and have been allowed to follow him in his work for months on end. Or Richard Kay, who became a close friend of Diana and the boys. More…...Angela Levin, Dickie Arbiter, Jennie Bond, Ingrid Seward, Hugo VIckers etc.

These sources also do TV interviews and take part in documentaries. They are the ones who get inside info and they can’t outright lie or they would be out of a job.
They don't 'slam' Meghan, they comment on what they have seen and have been told in a reasoned way. Their info and opinions are worth a read to anyone interested. At the end of the day, they have been able to learn more than you or I.
I would like to think I’m not so supercilious as to think the ‘slobbering public’ en masse can’t tell the difference between senseless tabloid fodder and articles with merit.

[GoldHeart]

Good....they just need their titles taken off them now then the mission is complete :laugh:

Give it a rest Jeeez :sleep:

[rusticgal]

Give it a rest Jeeez :sleep:


Give what a rest?....my opinion?

[jet]

Give it a rest Jeeez :sleep:

In other words, I don't like your opinion so shut up! How rude.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/10/11/16/34259056-8828167-image-a-17_1602430836202.jpg
[Meghan said they felt 'grateful' to spend time
with their son to witness moments
they 'otherwise might have missed
out on' in the absence of Covid
(pictured, with their son Archie)]