Laurence Fox Gets on a Front Page

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/879E/production/_117081743_tele1001ic-dtndt-1-190221-a001c-dt-nc.png



Top Left Corner


"People do not want their History Rewritten"

[Beso]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/879E/production/_117081743_tele1001ic-dtndt-1-190221-a001c-dt-nc.png



Top Left Corner


"People do not want their History Rewritten"



Reads the same as bottom right( edit, I'm a dick) to me.

[Shaun]

Okay. So does Liz Hurley.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/covers/287x361front/2021-02-19.jpg

[Ammi]

...I can’t even read beyond a headline...’people don’t want their history re-written’...I mean, it would be funny if it wasn’t funny...history is always inclusive of the good, bad and ugly etc...not just taking snippets and certain bits etc...and he’s objecting to that, he wants a selective bit of ‘highlight’, rather than a full unedited story to be told...?...silly, silly little sausage he is...but guy has got to make an income, I guess....and in such a negative and restless/unsettled world like this atm, he knows his audience of followers will be plentiful and there is opportunity to be had...

[Jake.]

Okay. So does Liz Hurley.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/covers/287x361front/2021-02-19.jpg

:joker:

[arista]

...I can’t even read beyond a headline...’people don’t want their history re-written’...I mean, it would be funny if it wasn’t funny...history is always inclusive of the good, bad and ugly etc...not just taking snippets and certain bits etc...and he’s objecting to that, he wants a selective bit of ‘highlight’, rather than a full unedited story to be told...?...silly, silly little sausage he is...but guy has got to make an income, I guess....and in such a negative and restless/unsettled world like this atm, he knows his audience of followers will be plentiful and there is opportunity to be had...



Its Typical of L. Fox
against Woke fools

[arista]

Okay. So does Liz Hurley.

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/covers/287x361front/2021-02-19.jpg



Yes Liz
not a Political person.

[Ammi]

Its Typical of L. Fox
against Woke fools

...it’s become typical of L.Fox because he needs an income, Arista...there is no ‘woke’, it’s just an up to date label being attached by those who apparently don’t like labels...and he’s the fool because these things have a very short and limited shelf life....

[Black Dagger]

Yes Liz
not a Political person.

Neither is Laurence.

Unless being a rent a gob****e makes you a local MP now.

[Ammi]

...I guess as only Liz was mentioned that she’s the one who is the Queen of Lockdown...:laugh:...did anyone let Amanda know that, then...


...edited to say that it would be Liz as Queen for me as well...:flutter:...sorry Amanda but 2nd place is pretty good as well...

[user104658]

Right above "Ironing tea towels: The big new housekeeping debate"

Hard hitting stuff.

[UserSince2005]

Can we have him on page 3 also. hes absolutely gorgeous.

[Nicky91]

Can we have him on page 3 also. hes absolutely gorgeous.

ew no thank you

almost my breakfast came back up

[arista]

Neither is Laurence.

Unless being a rent a gob****e makes you a local MP now.


No
he has changed
When he went on Question Time
saying he can not help, being White


Also he set up a Political Movement
Went live on daytime TV.

[Kazanne]

Can we have him on page 3 also. hes absolutely gorgeous.

Oh yes,he is quite a looker:wavey:

[GoldHeart]

...it’s become typical of L.Fox because he needs an income, Arista...there is no ‘woke’, it’s just an up to date label being attached by those who apparently don’t like labels...and he’s the fool because these things have a very short and limited shelf life....

He really is a tedious weasel can't stand him :bored:

[The Slim Reaper]

Its Typical of L. Fox
against Woke fools

What does woke mean, Arista?

[arista]

What does woke mean, Arista?


[Woke

past of wake1.

adjectiveinformal•US
adjective: woke; comparative adjective: woker; superlative adjective: wokest

alert to injustice in society, especially racism.
"we need to stay angry, and stay woke"]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke

[The Slim Reaper]

[Woke

past of wake1.

adjectiveinformal•US
adjective: woke; comparative adjective: woker; superlative adjective: wokest

alert to injustice in society, especially racism.
"we need to stay angry, and stay woke"]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woke

Alert to injustice and racism, as understood by the words you copied and pasted.

Arista: Woke fools.


Hmm, so woke means being a decent human being, but to you they're fools?

[arista]

Alert to injustice and racism, as understood by the words you copied and pasted.

Arista: Woke fools.


Hmm, so woke means being a decent human being, but to you they're fools?


Woke Folks are Fools
in the sense they are demanding changes
without Democracy.

[The Slim Reaper]

Woke Folks are Fools
in the sense they are demanding changes
without Democracy.

So democracy is your pet peeve? You cheered on Boris' attempts to illegally close parliament, then you cheered on when they tried to give themselves the power to back out of democratically agreed legal agreements with other nations. Does that make you woke?

[arista]

So democracy is your pet peeve? You cheered on Boris attempts to illegally close parliament? Then you cheered on when they tried to give themselves the power to back out of democratically agreed legal agreements with other nations. Does that make you woke?


No

[The Slim Reaper]

No

So why are people concerned with injustice and racism, fools?

[arista]

So why are people concerned with injustice and racism, fools?


Woke Fools
are demanding changes that are not in Law,
change the Power
to a Woke Prime Minister

[The Slim Reaper]

Woke Fools
are demanding changes that on not in Law,
change the Power
to a Woke Prime Minister

So demanding the government acts in the best interests of everyone is a bad thing?

[arista]

So demanding the government acts in the best interests of everyone is a bad thing?


Change Laws from within Parliament
thats how the UK works.

[The Slim Reaper]

Change Laws from within Parliament
thats how the UK works.

I've already shown you cheered for illegal actions though. You're tying yourself up in circular knots. Why not just say that you don't care about anyone else and you have zero issues with racism? It would be quicker.

[arista]

I've already shown you cheered for illegal actions though. You're tying yourself up in circular knots. Why not just say that you don't care about anyone else and you have zero issues with racism? It would be quicker.


Hold On
At that time, they were Legal.
Brexit Matters
Slim.

[arista]

And for the Record
I care about Racism, it is Very Wrong
and illegal under UK laws.

[The Slim Reaper]

Hold On
At that time, they were Legal.
Brexit Matters
Slim.

It was never legal to close parliament as they tried to do, especially after sending Mogg to lie to the queen.

And for the Record
I care about Racism, it is Very Wrong
and illegal under UK laws.

Well you gave the definition of woke, then called them fools. Sort of contradicts what you're claiming now.

[arista]

It was never legal to close parliament as they tried to do, especially after sending Mogg to lie to the queen.



Well you gave the definition of woke, then called them fools. Sort of contradicts what you're claiming now.


Of Course
but there are other Type's of Woke Fools
that is what L. Fox is attacking.

[The Slim Reaper]

Of Course
but there are other Type's of Woke Fools
that is what L. Fox is attacking.

You used woke fools. He's scared of our history being rewritten, so what parts do you think he means? Especially when he's linked it to the removal of statues of folks that made bank on the backs of slaves.

[arista]

You used woke fools. He's scared of our history being rewritten, so what parts do you think he means? Especially when he's linked it to the removal of statues of folks that made bank on the backs of slaves.


Yes I am all for
New Information Slabs by Statues.


L. Fox
is against Films using
Asians in a 2nd World War Film,
he wants his own vision.

[The Slim Reaper]

Yes I am all for
New Information Slabs by Statues.


L. Fox
is against Films using
Asians in a 2nd World War Film,
he wants his own vision.

You mean Sikhs? He was wrong, we had 2 million fighting for us across both world wars. Sounds like Mr Fox wanted to rewrite history to exclude the contributions of minorities. What would any normal person think that means about Laurence and his intentions? And why would someone claiming to think that racism is wrong, be supporting his incorrect view of history and race?

He's trying to rewrite the same history he doesn't want rewritten :shrug:

[arista]

You mean Sikhs? He was wrong, we had 2 million fighting for us across both world wars. Sounds like Mr Fox wanted to rewrite history to exclude the contributions of minorities. What would any normal person think that means about Laurence and his intentions? And why would someone claiming to think that racism is wrong, be supporting his incorrect view of history and race?

He's trying to rewrite the same history he doesn't want rewritten :shrug:


Yes in a Film "1917"
that was Great, I watched in a 4DX Cinema
just before Covid arrived.
(4DX Cinema is Fantastic)


Fox is in that Film,
it is, his own Visions of what he prefers.

[arista]

He would be great as the Mayor

[Crimson Dynamo]

where has slim gone now?

[hijaxers]

where has slim gone now?

Filling in his application to beat Laurence :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

He would be great as the Mayor

+1

[arista]

1420698756031340546

[Alf]

1420698756031340546Jesus wept!

GB News telling their guests what they should be saying.

Lunatics everywhere!

[user104658]

Jesus wept!

GB News telling their guests what they should be saying.

Lunatics everywhere!

He's not "telling" him anything, he asks him a question;

("Aren't you part of the problem here?")

and instead of answering it properly;

("No I don't think so, and here's why...")

He chooses to not answer it at all or give any reasoning, but instead whinge about his freedom of speech being attacked, when it isn't;

("Waaah waaah I can say what I want u don't get to tell me about my tweetz!")


He's being asked for some sort of reasoning but fails to give any. Why has he even bothered going on if he doesn't want to answer a fairly simple question? Waste of space, waste of time. Not many people's time mind you because it was on GB News.

[arista]

Jesus wept!

GB News telling their guests what they should be saying.

Lunatics everywhere!



Tom is advising him
for good health reasons
to make sure, he says get a vax.


It was a Civil debate


Good of GBnewsHD in Paddington
to ask him in
Early today.

[Alf]

He's not "telling" him anything, he asks him a question;

("Aren't you part of the problem here?")

and instead of answering it properly;

("No I don't think so, and here's why...")

He chooses to not answer it at all or give any reasoning, but instead whinge about his freedom of speech being attacked, when it isn't;

("Waaah waaah I can say what I want u don't get to tell me about my tweetz!")


He's being asked for some sort of reasoning but fails to give any. Why has he even bothered going on if he doesn't want to answer a fairly simple question? Waste of space, waste of time. Not many people's time mind you because it was on GB News.Tom said something along the lines of "you shouldn't be posting those messages with the big following you have and then in the next sentence he said that Fox should post what he wants him to post to his followers, instead"


If you want to get people vaccinated, then start by getting all these clowns off the television, because most of the country don't believe a word they say, there's zero trust, it has totally gone.

[user104658]

Tom said something along the lines of "you shouldn't be posting those messages with the big following you have "

He pointed out the content of the tweets and asked;

"aren't you part of the problem". At no point does he say "you shouldn't". He did say "I do think there is a genuine problem when people with large followings tweet out to many people that they shouldn't take the vaccine" - this is clearly stated as his opinion, and thus, falls entirely under GB News' supposed remit of freedom of expression.

There is a difference, a clear one, between "I think it's a problem" and "you shouldn't do that". You can think something is problematic, and tell them so, whilst conceding their freedom to do whatever they want. I think this may be the idea some people struggle with.

and then in the next sentence he said that Fox should post what he wants him to post to his followers, instead"

No in fact it was Fox who sarcastically asked "should I get a Tom Harwood tweet passport" and then he replied - in the same sarcastic/tongue in cheek tone - "I think everyone should really, that would really help". Pretending that either of these is a serious statement is disingenuous, especially when it was Fox who started that exchange of sarcasm.

Towards the end he says;

"IF you were to tell your legions of followers to get the vaccine..."

Again a speculation/statement of opinion. There's no way to frame this as a demand.

You can't misquote and misrepresent a 1min 30sec video when it's right here in the thread - you posted it! - for everyone to listen to. It even has subtitles for goodness sakes, we can quote it verbatim.

[Alf]

He pointed out the content of the tweets and asked;

"aren't you part of the problem". At no point does he say "you shouldn't". He did say "I do think there is a genuine problem when people with large followings tweet out to many people that they shouldn't take the vaccine" - this is clearly stated as his opinion, and thus, falls entirely under GB News' supposed remit of freedom of expression.

There is a difference, a clear one, between "I think it's a problem" and "you shouldn't do that". You can think something is problematic, and tell them so, whilst conceding their freedom to do whatever they want. I think this may be the idea some people struggle with.



No in fact it was Fox who sarcastically asked "should I get a Tom Harwood tweet passport" and then he replied - in the same sarcastic/tongue in cheek tone - "I think everyone should really, that would really help". Pretending that either of these is a serious statement is disingenuous, especially when it was Fox who started that exchange of sarcasm.

Towards the end he says;

"IF you were to tell your legions of followers to get the vaccine..."

Again a speculation/statement of opinion. There's no way to frame this as a demand.

You can't misquote and misrepresent a 1min 30sec video when it's right here in the thread - you posted it! - for everyone to listen to. It even has subtitles for goodness sakes, we can quote it verbatim.I didn't misquote, I didn't even quote him, I said "Something along the lines of"

Anyway, I couldn't give a sh!t, I said my opinion and that's that, I'm not here for a lecture of you.

Go bother someone else.

[user104658]

I didn't misquote, I didn't even quote him, I said "Something along the lines of"


You said "something along the lines of" and then posted something that was not "along the lines of" what he said at all, misrepresenting an expressed opinion as a demand, as I pointed out by quoting what he actually said.

If you're not here to debate the content you post, don't post it in debates?

[Alf]

You said "something along the lines of" and then posted something that was not "along the lines of" what he said at all, misrepresenting an expressed opinion as a demand, as I pointed out by quoting what he actually said.

If you're not here to debate the content you post, don't post it in debates?Is that an order?

[arista]

Alf:
this fella avoided the Vaccine
Real Tragic................

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/129D2/production/_119624267_metro-nc.png

[user104658]

Is that an order?

Do orders have question marks after them? I see you're still confused by these concepts Alf. Don't worry your pretty little head about it :hee:

[Livia]

Do orders have question marks after them? I see you're still confused by these concepts Alf. Don't worry your pretty little head about it :hee:

Really, really tired of FMs telling other FMs how ****ing stupid they are.

[Rob!]

Woke Folks are Fools
in the sense they are demanding changes
without Democracy.

The right have completely made up their own definition for the word, ironically rewriting the definition of something to meet their own needs.

[Crimson Dynamo]

2AkckY9DhI0