PDA

View Full Version : Richard Madeley OUTS SAGE Scientist as a COMMUNIST!


Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 03:08 PM
https://mediacloud.theweek.co.uk/image/private/s--YHr92nzZ--/f_auto,t_primary-image-mobile@1/v1604754489/theweek/2017/10/valentin-shcherbakov-a-spectre-is-haunting-europe-the-spectre-of-communism-c.jpg

Genial and popular daytime television personality, Richard Madeley found himself at the
centre of a vicious Twitter storm yesterday after he courteously invited a
scientist to deny her advice to the government as a member of the SAGE
committee was coloured by her extreme politics.

She wants the lockdown to go on and on and did not like Dickie outing her Extreme left politics

1411938942702788611

“A behavioural scientist who wants mask mandates to continue forever
freaked out and refused to answer the question when asked if her lifetime
membership of the Communist Party informed her beliefs,” wrote
conservative commentator, Paul Joseph Watson.

In another post, Watson wrote: “Reminder that ‘Communist’ Michie is literally
one of the behavioural scientists who used ‘totalitarian’, ‘unethical’ fear
tactics to terrify the British public, yet the people on here [Twitter] think
it’s ‘misogynistic’ to ask about her political beliefs.”

https://foxhole.news/2021/07/06/watch-gmb-host-madeley-exposes-communist-sage-committee-member/

arista
06-07-2021, 03:11 PM
Yes he Dug that up this morning

He is not on Tomorrow
its Alastair Campbell for one day.

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 03:15 PM
She should be sacked

Cherie
06-07-2021, 03:18 PM
Her face when he brought it up :laugh:

How on earth is she able to sit on a panel given her political views :shrug:

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 03:23 PM
Her face when he brought it up :laugh:

How on earth is she able to sit on a panel given her political views :shrug:

"According to communist writers and thinkers, the goal of communism is to create a society without a government or a system of classes, and to end capitalism" wiki

so you know she has got the back of business

:facepalm:

Cherie
06-07-2021, 03:25 PM
"According to communist writers and thinkers, the goal of communism is to create a society without a government or a system of classes, and to end capitalism" wiki

so you know she has got the back of business

:facepalm:

I have seen her interviewed before and she was banging on about keeping restrictions going for years :facepalm:

bots
06-07-2021, 03:37 PM
but that's why scientists advise and elected politicians take the final decision, i don't think it matters what her politics are. The point surely is to get a broad analysis so that we get the fullest picture

user104658
06-07-2021, 03:38 PM
Dumb thread go derby dumb dumb.

Smithy
06-07-2021, 03:39 PM
Nobody:

LT: https://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/icons/icon4.gif

The Slim Reaper
06-07-2021, 03:40 PM
Nobody:

LT: https://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/icons/icon4.gif

:joker:

arista
06-07-2021, 03:43 PM
Dumb thread go derby dumb dumb.


Its a Legit Viewpoint
though, Wise TS

user104658
06-07-2021, 04:16 PM
Its a Legit Viewpoint
though, Wise TS


Asking pointed, accusatory questions, demanding answers to those questions, and then drawing conclusions from a refusal to answer is not a “legit” debating tactic by any stretch of the imagination. It’s almost always an attempt to “set a snare” by the person asking the question. The ONLY legitimate thing to do when someone “demands” the answer to a leading question is to refuse to answer it - even if you have an answer.

Cherie
06-07-2021, 04:17 PM
but that's why scientists advise and elected politicians take the final decision, i don't think it matters what her politics are. The point surely is to get a broad analysis so that we get the fullest picture

She has extreme views which could impact her decision making

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 04:22 PM
Asking pointed, accusatory questions, demanding answers to those questions, and then drawing conclusions from a refusal to answer is not a “legit” debating tactic by any stretch of the imagination. It’s almost always an attempt to “set a snare” by the person asking the question. The ONLY legitimate thing to do when someone “demands” the answer to a leading question is to refuse to answer it - even if you have an answer.

he wasnt debating her he was asking questions as a news anchor

and boy was she seething that her awful extreme politics got outed

Alf
06-07-2021, 04:23 PM
Great journalism by Dickie.

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 04:24 PM
Great journalism by Dickie.

Thats why he got that gig because he can smell a rat a mile off

great old school journalist

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 04:29 PM
Professor Michie’s views on suppressing coronavirus were recently described as
“nonsense” by geneticist Professor Antony Brooks from Leicester University who has
signed an open letter calling for an end to restrictions.

“If we continue with such stringent lockdown and suppression measures, the really
nasty mutations of SARS-CoV-2 (which will always be out there - and likewise for all the
other respiratory viruses) will be selected over the regular strains,” he said.

“Instead of keeping us safe, her plan could help these strains to emerge and spread into
dominance.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/25/government-scientist-has-advocated-covid-controls-member-communist/

user104658
06-07-2021, 04:34 PM
he wasnt debating her he was asking questions as a news anchor

and boy was she seething that her awful extreme politics got outed


Doesn’t matter, you don’t answer “boobytrap” questions. If someone demands an answer you refuse until they ask the question more fairly. Refusal to answer doesn’t indicate stance. You should always refuse.

Someone asks “Answer the question - do you believe that _________ or not???”

You don’t answer, you don’t pander, you don’t cave to aggressive questioning. It’s an automatic loss.

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 04:40 PM
There are some things that Prof Michie – whose first husband was Andrew Murray, once
a key adviser to former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn – is rather less inclined to discuss,
including money. Perhaps because she has so much of it. Indeed, she is the blue-
blooded descendant of an earl who, along with her brother, sold a family heirloom – a
Picasso painting called L'Enfant Au Pigeon – to Qatari royals for £50 million in 2013. This
didn't stop her once urging fellow Communists to support Jeremy Corbyn at a
presentation with the words: 'We, the working class…' :hehe:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9508159/IAN-GALLAGHER-lockdowns-biggest-fan-communist.html

Tom4784
06-07-2021, 05:49 PM
Deleted Post

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 05:54 PM
Does anyone have a source for this story that isn't from a far right nutjob website?

https://media4.giphy.com/media/ZBJRkXmd6B7tgnL5Gg/giphy.gif

GoldHeart
06-07-2021, 05:59 PM
Richard Madeley is so annoying and dithering, I've never liked his 'interview style'.

The Slim Reaper
06-07-2021, 06:06 PM
If you're consulting wiki to find out a 2 line headline to describe a political movement, then you have no business pretending the earth is falling in, over something you don't even understand.

Crimson Dynamo
06-07-2021, 06:13 PM
Richard Madeley is so annoying and dithering, I've never liked his 'interview style'.

He is a national treasure and much loved

joeysteele
06-07-2021, 06:24 PM
I watched this and couldn't get his point at all.

He's rather pathetic in my view and makes silly errors.

She refused to take any of his bait which is wise with people like him and she talked fairly good sense too on the virus.

I think he's trying a bit too hard to create controversy as Morgan did.
However he's failing even at that so perhaps concentrate more on getting things more correct on the programme.

Tom4784
06-07-2021, 06:25 PM
Deleted Post

bots
06-07-2021, 06:40 PM
He is a national treasure and much loved

he is a complete tit

Beso
06-07-2021, 06:41 PM
He appeals to easily pleased and gullible people.

And hippies.

smudgie
06-07-2021, 07:31 PM
He is a proper Dick.
Her political views are her own, nothing to do with him.
I don’t particularly agree with her stance on Covid, but she doesn’t stand alone on it.:shrug:

MTVN
06-07-2021, 07:34 PM
SAGE have been the single biggest influence of government policy over the last 15 months so I don't see why their members political views should be immune from scrutiny, not sure the same courtesy would be extended if a SAGE member was part of a hard right movement

FYI the Communist Party of Britain subscribes to Marxist-Leninism, the ideology that Stalin was the father of and which led Soviet policy for most of the USSRs existence

user104658
06-07-2021, 07:37 PM
SAGE have been the single biggest influence of government policy over the last 15 months so I don't see why their members political views should be immune from scrutiny, not sure the same courtesy would be extended if a SAGE member was part of a hard right movement

FYI the Communist Party of Britain subscribes to Marxist-Leninism, the ideology that Stalin was the father of and which led Soviet policy for most of the USSRs existence


Not about being immune from scrutiny, it’s about “gotcha” entrapment arguments and their place in a professional interview or half decent debate.

That being; They have no place. She was right to ignore the aggressive demand-based questioning.

MTVN
06-07-2021, 07:43 PM
Not about being immune from scrutiny, it’s about “gotcha” entrapment arguments and their place in a professional interview or half decent debate.

That being; They have no place. She was right to ignore the aggressive demand-based questioning.

He asked if her political views have any bearing on how comfortable she is with increased state powers given that Communist countries are renowned for placing great restrictions on their citizens

It's a pretty relevant question imo, she declined to answer twice and he said 'that's a perfectly fair answer and thank you for that', hardly aggressive interviewing

joeysteele
06-07-2021, 10:34 PM
He is a proper Dick.
Her political views are her own, nothing to do with him.
I don’t particularly agree with her stance on Covid, but she doesn’t stand alone on it.:shrug:

He can be annoying.

I also agree, it wasn't an appropriate question in my view.
She wasn't on talking about elections or anything it was about the virus.

I don't know of any other scientists or even other so called experts who have been questioned on their political stance when talking about the virus.

Ammi
07-07-2021, 05:03 AM
….she was giving a view that aligned with many other SAGE views, so the question had no relevance at all other than to try to be sensationalist in some way and to ‘create a moment’ and it was clumsy…..if she had just given him some kind of extreme views that didn’t align with her colleagues then the question would have been valid but it wasn’t and she effortlessly made him look a bit silly for asking it…it just feels like another ‘quest for outrage’ rather than seeking informative facts from a guest on the show….and over something as important as people’s lives ….he wouldn’t have backed off with his ‘fair answer’ had he had any type of point but he really didn’t, based on what she was saying and what she was saying showed her in the process of displaying to him that her policy had no bearing on her job credentials….


….what a silly man he it’s and his silliness does seem to be impacting his work, though, in contrast….

bots
07-07-2021, 05:28 AM
i have no idea who she is, ive never heard her in the past, but i think we should be clear on what sage's roll is

Sage typically is made up of over 80 participants, it provides a broad spectrum of scientific advice to government. It doesn't make any decisions.


1 voice in over 80 just means nothing, lets have some perspective into what part she actually plays in the proceedings

Cherie
07-07-2021, 06:58 AM
I don't think there is any outrage but it is of public interest what politics these people follow, almost like a conflict of interest form that everyone has to fill out at work?

joeysteele
07-07-2021, 09:06 AM
I didn't see the relevance of his question to her considering she was on to talk about the virus.

He may well along with others see the Communist party as unsavoury as I myself do as to politics.
However individual or professional views on other subjects have no bearing on that.

Plus too, the Communist party is NOT an illegal institution in the UK.

So should all experts, professionals, scientists and advisors now be asked which Party they are members of too.

No of course they shouldn't be asked that in my view..

Ammi
07-07-2021, 09:15 AM
I didn't see the relevance of his question to her considering she was on to talk about the virus.

He may well along with others see the Communist party as unsavoury as I myself do as to politics.
However individual or professional views on other subjects have no bearing on that.

Plus too, the Communist party is NOT an illegal institution in the UK.

So should all experts, professionals, scientists and advisors now be asked which Party they are members of too.

No of course they shouldn't be asked that in my view..


…to give him credit, Joey…?…I do feel that maybe he did quickly realise how misjudged and clumsy it all was, which is why he so readily retreated with his ‘fair answer’….

The Slim Reaper
07-07-2021, 09:21 AM
SAGE have been the single biggest influence of government policy over the last 15 months so I don't see why their members political views should be immune from scrutiny, not sure the same courtesy would be extended if a SAGE member was part of a hard right movement

FYI the Communist Party of Britain subscribes to Marxist-Leninism, the ideology that Stalin was the father of and which led Soviet policy for most of the USSRs existence

Just to point out, that Britain tried herd immunity first - made clear by Boris' speech in February, and confirmed by Cummings. That was not sage. Then late lockdowns, the Christmas back and forth were all Johnson working against advice, and not sage who were consistently recommending earlier lockdowns.

The government has always tried to do anything and everything else before taking the appropriate advice. Eat out to help out and taking schools to court and forcing them to open were nothing to do with sage.

joeysteele
07-07-2021, 09:51 AM
…to give him credit, Joey…?…I do feel that maybe he did quickly realise how misjudged and clumsy it all was, which is why he so readily retreated with his ‘fair answer’….

Oh I get that definitely Ammi.
It was the right thing to do too.

However he isn't a novice presenter and interviewer.
He has years of vast experience.

For me, it more demonstrated he can't detach his personal prejudices from the professional expectation of himself which there should be.

DouglasS
07-07-2021, 10:21 AM
She is ridiculous and idiotic.
Good job on him for calling her out

DouglasS
07-07-2021, 10:27 AM
He is a national treasure and much loved

Never knew much about him but seeing him call out Dr Hilary for ridiculous claims such as “we have freedom already” (meanwhile kids aren’t at school, uni students have yet to even attend a lecture in person or meet people outside their living arrangements and people are not even able to work from home or attend any events” is ridiculous.

and now this, he seems like a great guy speaking truths :clap1:

MTVN
07-07-2021, 12:09 PM
Just to point out, that Britain tried herd immunity first - made clear by Boris' speech in February, and confirmed by Cummings. That was not sage. Then late lockdowns, the Christmas back and forth were all Johnson working against advice, and not sage who were consistently recommending earlier lockdowns.

The government has always tried to do anything and everything else before taking the appropriate advice. Eat out to help out and taking schools to court and forcing them to open were nothing to do with sage.

It was actually, in fact I don't think Boris himself has ever used the term herd immunity but Vallance specifically talked about the need to build it up in February. SAGEs advice was certainly one of the biggest reasons behind how long it took us to lock down - they were still sceptical of implementing a full lockdown well into mid March

The Slim Reaper
07-07-2021, 12:58 PM
It was actually, in fact I don't think Boris himself has ever used the term herd immunity but Vallance specifically talked about the need to build it up in February. SAGEs advice was certainly one of the biggest reasons behind how long it took us to lock down - they were still sceptical of implementing a full lockdown well into mid March

You don't need to say the words "herd immunity" to be promoting it.

Here is his speech in February before it took hold, talking about us being the country brave enough to stay open. There was only ever one way that could happen - herd immunity.

tLRZdKGLpew

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-sage-urged-govt-to-lockdown-a-week-earlier-uks-chief-scientific-adviser-says-12029956

Coronavirus: SAGE urged government to lockdown a week earlier, UK's chief scientific adviser says (regarding the initial march LD)

Here he is again, clearly talking about the strategy of herd immunity, without saying the exact phrase.

PiZJOOxHFb0

Dominic Cummings tells committee he heard PM say 'let the bodies pile high' after ordering second lockdown

https://news.sky.com/story/dominic-cummings-says-he-heard-pm-say-let-the-bodies-pile-high-12317584

This is who has been making the decisions, and I saw a James O'Brien clip from earlier today and he made a good point; If Hancock was still in charge, do you think we'd be rushing headlong into doing scrapping all protections in July, in the same as we are under Libertarian Ayn Rand acolyte, Sajid? Because I don't.

Hancock would definitely have a more measured approach to re-opening fully, and this for me, absolutely demonstrates it's about the personal approaches of individuals versus any kind of clear strategy being governed by science.

The government have ignored things for as long as they could get away with it, and there would definitely be more clarity in objectivity if a different party was in office and handled this pandemic making the exact same decisions.

Before we worry about the extreme politics of one member of sage, tories were busy seriously restricting right to protest the other night with their actual authoritarianism, and are pushing through draconian asylum and police laws, and are trying to disenfranchise voters of colour with an voter ID policy that would impress the republicans across the pond.

The Slim Reaper
07-07-2021, 01:10 PM
Just to add - communism is an extremely broad church. I think there is actually some validity in asking her about it, but a question asking her for her definition, the way Farage just gets to talk in vague terms about immigrants, or Tommy gets to solely talk about his opposition to Muslim pedophiles.

I don't have an issue with questions to find out what people believe, but the use of Stalin and Russia as boogeymen, when Stalin's horrendous regime was a mix of communism, theocracy, and flat out magical thinking. It's not really a coincidence that he was brought up through the church.

Crimson Dynamo
11-07-2021, 06:17 PM
jHp-qnZp55w