View Full Version : Nige and Donnie one on one
This should be good, I'll even miss the Merseyside Derby for this.
1465674546007183361
user104658
30-11-2021, 02:18 PM
No different to Ellen "interviewing" Meghan Markle really? There's not much to be gained from watching someone being interviewed by their pals or someone with a matching political agenda. It may well be entertaining but there's not going to be much insight to be gained from it. Could have been great if they'd had Andrew Neil still there to do it... but then, I imagine Trump only agreed to it because it's Nige.
I will be GOBSMACKED if Nigel actually gives him an in-depth good faith interview.
Crimson Dynamo
30-11-2021, 02:34 PM
woo hoo cant wait
:dance:
No different to Ellen "interviewing" Meghan Markle really? There's not much to be gained from watching someone being interviewed by their pals or someone with a matching political agenda. It may well be entertaining but there's not going to be much insight to be gained from it. Could have been great if they'd had Andrew Neil still there to do it... but then, I imagine Trump only agreed to it because it's Nige.
I will be GOBSMACKED if Nigel actually gives him an in-depth good faith interview.Donnie took on the press who hated him, most days for four years, he would stand there for hours taking their questions. He's done interviews with them all over the years including Oprah, 60 minutes and the rest of the mainstream elites. He'd do his research on Andrew Neil beforehand and handle him with ease. He's box office.
Nicky91
30-11-2021, 02:37 PM
hopefully Donnie has also done his research on Nigel
also ask him the tough questions, Nige make him sweat
arista
30-11-2021, 02:56 PM
I wondered why he was not on at 7PM
Should be Fun.
Weds 7PM GBnewsHD
user104658
30-11-2021, 03:06 PM
Donnie took on the press who hated him, most days for four years, he would stand there for hours taking their questions. He's done interviews with them all over the years including Oprah, 60 minutes and the rest of the mainstream elites. He'd do his research on Andrew Neil beforehand and handle him with ease. He's box office.
He used to interview well in his younger days (90's and early 2000's) and I've seen one or two good interviews during his Presidential era where he came across much better than in larger press conferences. To say that he faired well in those is not really accurate for me. He'd dodge and stonewall questions flippantly which his support base loved, but it's not really the same as annihilating a reporter with a spot-on answer is it. Granted - at the very least - I won't deny that he interviews better than Biden. I would note there though that Biden has a speech impediment - which is something that people like to conveniently forget or overlook.
I've seen him do plenty of absolutely dire interviews where he seemed uncomfortable and out of his depth as well though... this narrative that he's perfect is very odd.
Anyway, again, if he'd do well in an interview with an impartial reporter asking real unrehearsed questions then that's what I'd rather see than him sitting having an "interview" (a chat) with someone we know fine well he already knows, and likes, and who likes him, and who is not impartial by any measure.
arista
30-11-2021, 03:15 PM
https://twitter.com/RobBurl/status/1465688677586284547
Even the Former BBC Political Editor / Producer of Marr
and BBC Politics has posted it, Alf.
Rob has now left the BBC.
arista
30-11-2021, 03:20 PM
wrong thread :hehe:
Thats Fine
I have done the same.
Tom4784
30-11-2021, 03:22 PM
Deleted Post
Should be a fun time for the gullible idiots that can stomach to watch such a pair of arseholes, but I for one do not want to watch Nigel Farage desperately rim Donald Trump for attention.Gullibe. An anagram of that is Blue Gill. That's my prediction for the name of the next variant. The Blue Gill variant.
Jordan.
30-11-2021, 03:41 PM
6xfBw1bbV4k
Crimson Dynamo
30-11-2021, 03:54 PM
SHould comfortably be a record audience tuning in
SHould comfortably be a record audience tuning inHibs vs The Gers is on at the same time. Does that put you in a bit of a pickle?
Crimson Dynamo
30-11-2021, 05:13 PM
Hibs vs The Gers is on at the same time. Does that put you in a bit of a pickle?
D:
arista
30-11-2021, 07:07 PM
It is 2 Hours Long.
Tom4784
01-12-2021, 02:19 PM
Deleted Post
Anti-vaxxers are such cowards, they go on about fear tactics and things relating to the virus yet they don't see that they are so scared of reality that they choose to lie to themselves and others to delude themselves. They speak of fear only as a way to project their own fear onto others.Thanks for letting us know that.
Nicky91
01-12-2021, 02:26 PM
Anti-vaxxers are such cowards, they go on about fear tactics and things relating to the virus yet they don't see that they are so scared of reality that they choose to lie to themselves and others to delude themselves. They speak of fear only as a way to project their own fear onto others.
i can not speak for everyone, but yes partially i agree, and wouldn't call them cowards, just plain dumb, especially those who got very very active social lives
people like me, who never come anywhere, the anti-social ones i don't know
i mean it is not like i did go socializing before this pandemic, and not like i suddenly will if i am vaxxed, so
Livia
01-12-2021, 02:48 PM
Is it a fight? I'd definitely tune in for that.
user104658
01-12-2021, 02:55 PM
Is it a fight? I'd definitely tune in for that.
I'm actually quite looking forward to Tommy Fury vs Jake Paul (even though I'm convinced it'll be somewhat staged) but yeah I'd tune in to Trump vs Farage.
Farage is obviously significantly fitter but he has a weak-looking face so I reckon he'd be floored quite quickly if Trump got a good swing in.
And honestly I'd happily see either one of them lose :think:. Win-win situation really.
Livia
01-12-2021, 02:57 PM
I'm actually quite looking forward to Tommy Fury vs Jake Paul (even though I'm convinced it'll be somewhat staged) but yeah I'd tune in to Trump vs Farage.
Farage is obviously significantly fitter but he has a weak-looking face so I reckon he'd be floored quite quickly if Trump got a good swing in.
And honestly I'd happily see either one of them lose :think:. Win-win situation really.
Imagine Trump's tiny gloves.
arista
01-12-2021, 02:58 PM
Tonight GBnewsHD
7PM - 9PM
user104658
01-12-2021, 02:59 PM
Imagine Trump's tiny gloves.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/60/b3/c7/60b3c76963dea78d70b41eec9df22b47.jpg
Livia
01-12-2021, 03:01 PM
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/60/b3/c7/60b3c76963dea78d70b41eec9df22b47.jpg
LOL...
A fist fight between them is nice to think about.
a narcissist and a sycophant not my idea of an interesting watch
arista
01-12-2021, 07:03 PM
On Now
arista
01-12-2021, 07:47 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFhIMRnWUAMJv8h?format=jpg&name=small
user104658
01-12-2021, 09:10 PM
https://i.imgur.com/vXrXD8m.png
Crimson Dynamo
02-12-2021, 01:19 PM
nKZfKDciBMU
user104658
02-12-2021, 04:09 PM
Not sure if I can sit through the whole thing, watched about 5 minutes… still bleating about the “rigged election”. Living in the past. Sad.
Cant wait to get home to catch up on this...I've missed old donald.
Not sure if I can sit through the whole thing, watched about 5 minutes… still bleating about the “rigged election”. Living in the past. Sad.It's a work in progress, which means it's the present.
He's not a Meghan fan isn't Donnie, he's team Queen.
arista
02-12-2021, 05:32 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/ad_img/1466405609448824832/1Otc_W65?format=png&name=small
Crimson Dynamo
02-12-2021, 05:48 PM
Unsurprisingly, Farage’s interview with Trump last night was box office for GB
News. Figures seen by Guido show the interview pulled in Farage’s highest ever
viewer count, and the largest GB News viewership since its original opening
night. For two whole hours between 7pm to 9pm, GB News beat the BBC’s
average by 155,600 viewers to their 118,200, with Sky News some distance
behind on 60,500. The interview reached 208,500 just after 7pm and held
steady for the next hour. Nigel’s certainly earning his fee…
(Media Guido)
Unsurprisingly, Farage’s interview with Trump last night was box office for GB
News. Figures seen by Guido show the interview pulled in Farage’s highest ever
viewer count, and the largest GB News viewership since its original opening
night. For two whole hours between 7pm to 9pm, GB News beat the BBC’s
average by 155,600 viewers to their 118,200, with Sky News some distance
behind on 60,500. The interview reached 208,500 just after 7pm and held
steady for the next hour. Nigel’s certainly earning his fee…
(Media Guido)The last thing I say in post 4 of this thread.
James
02-12-2021, 06:00 PM
Unsurprisingly, Farage’s interview with Trump last night was box office for GB
News. Figures seen by Guido show the interview pulled in Farage’s highest ever
viewer count, and the largest GB News viewership since its original opening
night. For two whole hours between 7pm to 9pm, GB News beat the BBC’s
average by 155,600 viewers to their 118,200, with Sky News some distance
behind on 60,500. The interview reached 208,500 just after 7pm and held
steady for the next hour. Nigel’s certainly earning his fee…
(Media Guido)
None of these ratings are very good. :shrug:
Remember when Big Brother getting a million viewer was seen as a disaster.
Crimson Dynamo
02-12-2021, 06:36 PM
None of these ratings are very good. :shrug:
Remember when Big Brother getting a million viewer was seen as a disaster.
You have to view them in relation to 24 hour news channels and what they achieve.
YOu may as well look at Big Brother viewerships and say they are crap in comparison to Royal Weddings or England world cup games
user104658
02-12-2021, 07:13 PM
You have to view them in relation to 24 hour news channels and what they achieve.
It was an exclusive interview with one of the most - if not THE most - famous person on the planet over the past 5 years… you obviously do not “have to compare it to an average Wednesday night on 24h news” :joker:.
It was a one-off because of Trump’s high profile, and 155k live viewers is hilariously low.
Crimson Dynamo
02-12-2021, 07:18 PM
It was an exclusive interview with one of the most - if not THE most - famous person on the planet over the past 5 years… you obviously do not “have to compare it to an average Wednesday night on 24h news” :joker:.
It was a one-off because of Trump’s high profile, and 155k live viewers is hilariously low.
Again
not for a news channel
however, you try to deny it. Its a huge win for GB news
Nigel has been a unmitigated success
Jordan.
02-12-2021, 07:34 PM
Made no noise. How characteristically embarrassing for all involved in Gammon Britian news :joker:
Crimson Dynamo
02-12-2021, 07:50 PM
Made no noise. How characteristically embarrassing for all involved in Gammon Britian news :joker:
what is actually embarrassing is you are still having a go at people for their skin colour to score some imaginary point..
:skull:
Calling someone a 'gammon' is hate speech
Tanya Gold explains why calling someone a gammon is like calling a Jew a k**e or calling poor white Americans trailer trash
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/what-does-gammon-mean
user104658
02-12-2021, 08:03 PM
Again
not for a news channel
however, you try to deny it. Its a huge win for GB news
Nigel has been a unmitigated success
It’s a huge win for GB News but only because their viewership has been so low, it’s also a one-off as I find it extremely unlikely he has anyone else as interesting to the general public as Trump. He’s played his Trump Card already, quite literally :hehe:. An exclusive interview with a recent ex-POTUS is massive, 155k viewers is low for what it is no matter what channel it was on. I wonder if Donnie was duped into thinking it’s a bigger channel than it is?
Crimson Dynamo
02-12-2021, 08:06 PM
It’s a huge win for GB News but only because their viewership has been so low, it’s also a one-off as I find it extremely unlikely he has anyone else as interesting to the general public as Trump. He’s played his Trump Card already, quite literally :hehe:. An exclusive interview with a recent ex-POTUS is massive, 155k viewers is low for what it is no matter what channel it was on. I wonder if Donnie was duped into thinking it’s a bigger channel than it is?
as one of the most media astute men on the planet i very much doubt that
lol
Livia
03-12-2021, 11:08 AM
what is actually embarrassing is you are still having a go at people for their skin colour to score some imaginary point..
:skull:
Calling someone a 'gammon' is hate speech
Tanya Gold explains why calling someone a gammon is like calling a Jew a k**e or calling poor white Americans trailer trash
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/what-does-gammon-mean
Maybe a homophobic comeback is called for? I'm sure while he's calling out people because of their age, ethnicity and religion.... he wouldn't mind people pointing out he's gay in a homophobic way? Quid pro quo and all that.
user104658
03-12-2021, 11:12 AM
what is actually embarrassing is you are still having a go at people for their skin colour to score some imaginary point..
:skull:
Calling someone a 'gammon' is hate speech
Tanya Gold explains why calling someone a gammon is like calling a Jew a k**e or calling poor white Americans trailer trash
https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/what-does-gammon-mean
I mean it... it isn't... it isn't at all like those things. Those slurs are based on making assumptions or disliking a person based on something entirely abitrary and not because of their character. Calling someone a "Gammon" is an observation and comment on their character. There appears to be a misunderstanding here that people who are using the word Gammon believe that it applies to all middle aged white men and thus it's a slur based in generalisation akin to homophobia or racism.
People get branded "gammons" because of the things they have said, NOT because of their age or what they look like.
I mean it... it isn't... it isn't at all like those things. Those slurs are based on making assumptions or disliking a person based on something entirely abitrary and not because of their character. Calling someone a "Gammon" is an observation and comment on their character. There appears to be a misunderstanding here that people who are using the word Gammon believe that it applies to all middle aged white men and thus it's a slur based in generalisation akin to homophobia or racism.
People get branded "gammons" because of the things they have said, NOT because of their age or what they look like.
incorrect. Gammon is targeting middle aged white men for how they look, irrespective of what they say.
Liam-
03-12-2021, 11:19 AM
incorrect. Gammon is targeting middle aged white men for how they look, irrespective of what they say.
Incorrect
Liam-
03-12-2021, 11:23 AM
I mean it... it isn't... it isn't at all like those things. Those slurs are based on making assumptions or disliking a person based on something entirely abitrary and not because of their character. Calling someone a "Gammon" is an observation and comment on their character. There appears to be a misunderstanding here that people who are using the word Gammon believe that it applies to all middle aged white men and thus it's a slur based in generalisation akin to homophobia or racism.
People get branded "gammons" because of the things they have said, NOT because of their age or what they look like.
People know this, but seeing as angry, bigoted white people will take any opportunity to look like victims, they purposefully ignore the facts, it’s funny really because by doing so, they are exhibiting a prime example of gammonry
user104658
03-12-2021, 11:25 AM
incorrect. Gammon is targeting middle aged white men for how they look, irrespective of what they say.
There's literally no argument for this being the case. There are numerous middle-aged white men on TV who are never accused of being any variety of pork product.
Tom4784
03-12-2021, 04:11 PM
Deleted Post
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.