Prince Harry's book contains a "bombshell for Queen Camilla"

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/4121/production/_123237661_people-nc.png



https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-harrys-book-shake-royals-26215261

[Prince Harry’s bombshell new book
will make clear his *feelings about
stepmother Camilla and is set to
“shake the monarchy to the core”,
*according to a pal.

The Duke of Sussex’s friends *predict
that the Duchess of Cornwall – unveiled
by Her Majesty last week as the future
Queen Consort – will come in for particular
criticism in the no-holds barred memoir.

Harry used his latest public
appearance, a video call this week
with former Wales rugby captain
Gareth Thomas, to pay tribute
to his late mother, Diana.]



Sign Of The Times

[glib]

Oh just **** off harry, you money hungry bastard, never worked a day in your life, keep on moaning about how daddy gives you 1 million a year now instead of 10. Leave us alone.

[Vicky.]

According to a pal.

So...she dyes her hair or something. Shocker!

[bots]

set to
“shake the monarchy to the core” :joker:



I don't think so

[user104658]

He's probably going to "reveal" what we all already suspect deep down: that Charles and Camilla's relationship never actually fully ended and they were romantically involved throughout William and Harry's entire childhoods (and they were probably very aware of dad's "close friend"). That would make it very complicated to get completely on board with them finally becoming "official" all those years later.

[arista]

According to a pal.

So...she dyes her hair or something. Shocker!


No, I think it words she has said
in the past

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10503927/RICHARD-KAY-Whats-Harry-appear-change-tune-wonderful-woman-Camilla.html

RICHARD KAY: What's made Harry appear to change his tune about 'wonderful woman' Camilla? Deafening silence from Montecito after the Queen gave her ultimate approval to Charles' wife in her historic Platinum Jubilee message

[Eight months before her death, Princess Diana sat down to watch a television programme that had been billed as the biggest ever live debate on the future of the monarchy.
In reality, the show was a shambolic, ill-tempered and deeply unpleasant affair which even its contributors condemned as no better than a cockfight.

But Diana, in her Kensington Palace apartment that evening in early January 1997, was mesmerised. As were her two companions, sitting either side of her on the striped sofa — Prince William and Prince Harry.
As three of the nation's best-loved royals, they had more at stake, of course, than perhaps anyone else who had tuned in.
The programme reached its raucous zenith when the audience, some 3,000 strong, were asked whether Camilla Parker Bowles could ever be Queen, and to respond by holding up cue cards — blue for Yes, red for No.

The vote resulted in a blizzard of red cards and a resounding No, but in Diana's sitting room the moment was broken by the then 12-year-old Prince Harry.
'Who's Camilla?' he asked in a small voice. As a knowing William smothered his laughter, Diana told her younger son that it was something he had to ask his father about…..

…….Eight years after that nervous question, 'Who's Camilla?', Harry was in no doubt. During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, he said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

Warming to his theme, he added: 'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'....]

As in many ways, Harry then and the Harry now are like 2 different people.

[Livia]

I'm sure Americans will be enthralled by the tales these two tell. Maybe if they stopped getting their sources to release stuff on their behalf the could finally have the privacy they say they crave.

[bots]

you have to ask yourself why the queen decided to endorse Camilla after all these years at this specific time. It's not coincidence that's for sure

[Kizzy]

I think many are confusing privacy with freedom. He want's the freedom to say what he likes about who he likes. And who's to say he shouldn't, did he ask to be born into this pantomime?
Due to his family ties he will always be a target and never be able to live a fully normal life but he has the right have his say.

This crosses over with the thread on what is and isn't funny, to me it seems like many don't like the book because many of the figures in it are deemed sacrosanct.

[rusticgal]

you have to ask yourself why the queen decided to endorse Camilla after all these years at this specific time. It's not coincidence that's for sure


I have heard through the grapevine that The Queen is not in good health. That may be the reason she is endorsing this now rather than later...

[rusticgal]

I think many are confusing privacy with freedom. He want's the freedom to say what he likes about who he likes. And who's to say he shouldn't, did he ask to be born into this pantomime?
Due to his family ties he will always be a target and never be able to live a fully normal life but he has the right have his say.

This crosses over with the thread on what is and isn't funny, to me it seems like many don't like the book because many of the figures in it are deemed sacrosanct.


He is free to say what he wants...however maybe he should stop attacking his family. Lets see what he has to say. Harry moaned about being cut off financially by his father despite his evident wealth combined with that of Megan's......if he does discredit her maybe its a bit more revenge on his part :shrug:

[Kizzy]

Why should he, let him spill how he feels regardless this is cathartic it's not an attack. And even if it it were so what?

The public will decide how they feel once he explains list life experiences in his own words.

[Cherie]

Publicity, there probably wont be anything major in it as he could be sued.

Who will buy it :shrug:

[Jordan.]

According to a pal.

So...she dyes her hair or something. Shocker!

:skull:

The rags know they only need to report the bare minimum to get some people riled up about Harry.

[rusticgal]

The public will decide.....


They already have....no one is really interested :laugh:

[Kizzy]

They already have....no one is really interested :laugh:

Then why are we discussing it now?

[rusticgal]

Then why are we discussing it now?


...interested in buying the book :hee:

[Kizzy]

Speak for yourself, I'm interested. If David Mitchell narrates it for audible I'm in :)

[Crimson Dynamo]

Its Camilla I feel sorry for :sad:

[rusticgal]

Its Camilla I feel sorry for :sad:


I'm sure she will take it with a pinch of salt...


Camilla has held her own for years....all the obvious backlash she took. She just kept her head down and ultimately gained a lot of respect.

[bots]

i'm going to go into full on speculation mode and say it was Camilla that made the racist comment that they mentioned in that interview

[Glenn.]

Let’s be real here, there’s no bombshell.

Must be a quiet Sunday with no other news to tell.

The way this piece of non news has been received is pretty predictable and hilarious though

[Cherie]

i'm going to go into full on speculation mode and say it was Camilla that made the racist comment that they mentioned in that interview

probably

[jet]

i'm going to go into full on speculation mode and say it was Camilla that made the racist comment that they mentioned in that interview

Really? Why would you think it was her? :conf:

[Crimson Dynamo]

i'm going to go into full on speculation mode and say it was Camilla that made the racist comment that they mentioned in that interview

Asking about what the baby would look like is not racist

Saying if it were brown that would be an issue is

but we dont know any details so it is incorrect to say it was a racist comment

all we know was it was cheaply weaponised to appear racist

[rusticgal]

Asking about what the baby would look like is not racist

Saying if it were brown that would be an issue is

but we dont know any details so it is incorrect to say it was a racist comment

all we know was it was cheaply weaponised to appear racist


Exactly....it was Meghan and Harry that have made it out to be a racist comment. No one will know in what context the comment was made...

[arista]

i'm going to go into full on speculation mode and say it was Camilla that made the racist comment that they mentioned in that interview


Sure, very possible

[Livia]

Harry thought it was a racist comment and he should know. He should remember the backlash when he called a fellow soldier "my little **** friend".

[rusticgal]

Harry thought it was a racist comment and he should know. He should remember the backlash when he called a fellow soldier "my little **** friend".

:laugh:

[bots]

Asking about what the baby would look like is not racist

Saying if it were brown that would be an issue is

but we dont know any details so it is incorrect to say it was a racist comment

all we know was it was cheaply weaponised to appear racist

I am just speculating that Camilla will be the target of that "episode" in harry's book.

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/AB8C/production/_127861934_dailyexpress-nc.png.webp

[Gusto Brunt]

I used to think Harry and Meghan were just greedy.

But now, I am thinking, greed, evil, and vindictiveness.

[Zizu]

https://twitter.com/skynews/status/1599072380541730817?s=46&t=gdW_IZuwsP705uXDsM19cQ


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Beso]

https://twitter.com/skynews/status/1599072380541730817?s=46&t=gdW_IZuwsP705uXDsM19cQ


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That would be cute if it wernt so creepy at the end.

Poor kids.

[Glenn.]

It’s nice to see a royal with personality

[rusticgal]

I used to think Harry and Meghan were just greedy.

But now, I am thinking, greed, evil, and vindictiveness.


The bitterness continues to fester….:laugh:

[Beso]

It’s nice to see a royal with personality

He just had to lift the mask at the end to make it all about the wider audience and himself, but certainly not for the kids.

[Zizu]

He just had to lift the mask at the end to make it all about the wider audience and himself, but certainly not for the kids.


He had to show his face to get maximum effect .. other than that it’s just some guy in a costume


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[rusticgal]

He had to show his face to get maximum effect .. other than that it’s just some guy in a costume


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


It was Spider-Man…:cheer2:

….oh no it was actually Prince Harry :fist:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/12/03/22/65211545-0-image-a-7_1670105979376.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11499083/Charles-Camilla-weary-Harry-Meghans-never-ending-criticism-royals.html

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-70e50e06-47aa-43ef-9545-d7e1ccca36d0.jpeg

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-7ef1471b-fbac-4119-a3d2-d13bcfc23fb7.png

[Zizu]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/4121/production/_123237661_people-nc.png







https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-harrys-book-shake-royals-26215261



[Prince Harry’s bombshell new book

will make clear his *feelings about

stepmother Camilla and is set to

“shake the monarchy to the core”,

*according to a pal.



The Duke of Sussex’s friends *predict

that the Duchess of Cornwall – unveiled

by Her Majesty last week as the future

Queen Consort – will come in for particular

criticism in the no-holds barred memoir.



Harry used his latest public

appearance, a video call this week

with former Wales rugby captain

Gareth Thomas, to pay tribute

to his late mother, Diana.]







Sign Of The Times



Hurrah !!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/12/04/02/65215965-0-image-m-15_1670120716480.jpg

[bots]

“shake the monarchy to the core” :joker:

[Liam-]

‘Friends fear criticism of royal step mum’ says it all really doesn’t it? They can’t stand anyone not bowing at their feet, why wouldn’t a son criticise the woman who was shagging his dad behind his mothers back from the day they met, even the night before their marriage?

Just because she got given the crown, doesn’t change the fact that the her and Charles played his mother for a fool and he is perfectly entitled to feel a certain way about that

[Zizu]

‘Friends fear criticism of royal step mum’ says it all really doesn’t it? They can’t stand anyone not bowing at their feet, why wouldn’t a son criticise the woman who was shagging his dad behind his mothers back from the day they met, even the night before their marriage?

Just because she got given the crown, doesn’t change the fact that the her and Charles played his mother for a fool and he is perfectly entitled to feel a certain way about that


Applause [emoji122]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

‘Friends fear criticism of royal step mum’ says it all really doesn’t it? They can’t stand anyone not bowing at their feet, why wouldn’t a son criticise the woman who was shagging his dad behind his mothers back from the day they met, even the night before their marriage?

Just because she got given the crown, doesn’t change the fact that the her and Charles played his mother for a fool and he is perfectly entitled to feel a certain way about that

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'

:joker:

When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.

[arista]

1599371035023151104

[Cherie]

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'

:joker:

When it suits him he does a complete u - turn, which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.


:joker::joker:

[bots]

this is the way life is these days. It doesn't matter that someone completely contradicts themselves. It doesn't matter if what they are saying is complete lies. If it gets them some attention then they have achieved their aim

[Beso]

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'

:joker:

When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.




I bet this doesnt get quoted much in this thread.

[Glenn.]

Well considering no one has even read the book and have no idea of the contents of the book, No one can really comment. That’s common sense no?

Sitting here talking as though you all know what the book says is hilarious and typical of your tabloid fuelled opinions :joker:

[jet]

Well considering no one has even read the book and have no idea of the contents of the book, No one can really comment. That’s common sense no?

Sitting here talking as though you all know what the book says is hilarious and typical of your tabloid fuelled opinions :joker:

That's why I said:
When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance). :hmph:

But I hope you are right and he talks of his love and closeness to Camilla in his book. LOL.

[Crimson Dynamo]

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'

:joker:

When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.

:joker:

Gotcha

and of course its Meghan who has made him do all this, beggars belief it really does

[rusticgal]

During an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September 2005, Harry said he and William 'loved her to bits'.
He went on: 'She's a wonderful woman and she's made our father very, very happy, which is the most important thing.'

'Look at the position she's come into. Don't always feel sorry for me and William, feel sorry for her. We are grateful for her . . . we're very happy to have her around.'
Should there have been any lingering doubts about the brothers' feelings for the duchess, who had married their father five months earlier, Harry emphasised: 'To be honest, she's always been very close to me and William. But no, she's not the wicked stepmother, I'll say that right now.'

:joker:

When it suits him he does a complete u - turn (if he does in this instance) which is why anything Harry (or Meghan) comes off with is suspect - it may not be REAL - but for effect to suit their latest narrative.


Oh the influence of Meghan over fickle Harry....lets wait and see :laugh:

[rusticgal]

Well considering no one has even read the book and have no idea of the contents of the book, No one can really comment. That’s common sense no?

Sitting here talking as though you all know what the book says is hilarious and typical of your tabloid fuelled opinions :joker:

Lets speculate and have some fun....:hee:

[Beso]

Whaaaa, whaaaaa...my big bwovver shouted at me.


Whaaaaaa, whaaaaaaaa..I'm a big adult baby..

[bots]

i thinks its obvious that the rift between harry and the rest of the royal family is much bigger/permanent than originally thought

[thesheriff443]

i thinks its obvious that the rift between harry and the rest of the royal family is much bigger/permanent than originally thought

He claims in the latest netsh1t episode that Meghan was out shining William and doing a better job than his brother who was born into the role

Harry you are delusional.

[GoldHeart]

Merry Christmas I guess :rolleyes:

[Zizu]

i thinks its obvious that the rift between harry and the rest of the royal family is much bigger/permanent than originally thought


What if their version of events is true !!!?

After all … the ‘family’ haven’t been exactly squeaky clean or honest / transparent about events over the decades .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

What if their version of events is true !!!?

After all … the ‘family’ haven’t been exactly squeaky clean or honest / transparent about events over the decades .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

i didn't say anything about who was right or wrong, i just thinks its a much bigger rift between them than certainly I originally thought

[Zizu]

i didn't say anything about who was right or wrong, i just thinks its a much bigger rift between them than certainly I originally thought


Oh yeah I realise … I was adding to your point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Kazanne]

It sounds like Harry is quite jealous of William ,which is a shame.

[Beso]

It sounds like Harry is quite jealous of William ,which is a shame.

Is this the txt msg meghan went WOW at?

[rusticgal]

Im not being funny....but I dont recall seeing much footage of their Australian tour....let alone it supposidly being a 'huge' success. :shrug:
So I dont get the jealousy thing...
Too much of them trying to draw similarities to Diana and her popularity is starting to be a bit embarrassing.

[user104658]

It sounds like Harry is quite jealous of William ,which is a shame.

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

[GoldHeart]

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

Well it was a dysfunctional family overall.

[bots]

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

we just need to look back at how Margaret was treated to know that it's more than likely to be true

[thesheriff443]

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

That rivalry from harry was going on when Diana was alive basically harry was jealous of his brother

[AnnieK]

That rivalry from harry was going on when Diana was alive basically harry was jealous of his brother

When most of your family favour your sibling because a family firm hierarchy....it is human nature to develop deep rooted resentment. It is very hard to live in the shadow of someone and treated differently just because of the order of your birth. I feel for Harry.....I don't think its William's fault but I can empathise with Harry too

[Cherie]

Just watching clips of how close they were on the news, what a shame, its not what Diana would have wanted at all

[Cherie]

When most of your family favour your sibling because a family firm hierarchy....it is human nature to develop deep rooted resentment. It is very hard to live in the shadow of someone and treated differently just because of the order of your birth. I feel for Harry.....I don't think its William's fault but I can empathise with Harry too

Where is the evidence of that :shrug:

[Beso]

If it's true, it is a shame, and it can only be the fault of Charles & the rest of the family because sibling jealousy doesn't just spring up out of thin air.

Could be a psychological thing with the very public death of their mother.

[thesheriff443]

When most of your family favour your sibling because a family firm hierarchy....it is human nature to develop deep rooted resentment. It is very hard to live in the shadow of someone and treated differently just because of the order of your birth. I feel for Harry.....I don't think its William's fault but I can empathise with Harry too

What didn’t he have that William had, harry had the same top level education, he had access to everything William had

It’s not like it’s a tale of the prince and the pheasant and now harry should shut up because he got away from the firm living the life of luxury with his lovely wife and family

People are sick of the selfish cry baby

[Beso]

He had way more freedom than william, but rather than feel sympathy for his brother, he just outright attacks him for everyone to see.

[Cherie]

I am super confused so Wills wanted them out but he shouted and screamed at him at the Sandringham summit when they said they wanted to leave, which left Harry terrified though it was Charles Wills and the Queen at the meeting, not Tony Soprano

They were more popular than Will and Kate which is why Wills bullied them out, but they left due to racism....


I see :laugh:

I saw this clip on the ITV news how can people sit through hours of this rubbish

[Cherie]

Also didn't they want a half in half out arrangement which the Queen vetoed so how could Wills have bullied him out :hehe:


Liars will always be found out

[GoldHeart]

I wonder what The Queen would say if she was alive.

[Liam-]

Probably do what she always did, close ranks and protect those most important to the business

[hijaxers]

I wonder what The Queen would say if she was alive.

She'd say recollections may vary ~ and they obviously do :laugh:

[DemolitionRed]

Have Harry & Meghan ever actually hurt people in the UK? Have they ever deprived poor kids of school meals? Cut people's benefits? Sent covid patients into care homes? Crashed the economy? So why is there MORE hatred for them than the politicians who did?

If you don’t like Harry and Meghan, you don’t have to watch their documentary series on Netflix. You don’t have to click on articles about them or search their names in google or on social media. You can just scroll on. You really can.

[Zizu]

That rivalry from harry was going on when Diana was alive basically harry was jealous of his brother


At the age of 11 and under ?

Any proof


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

I don’t know why everyone is getting so worked up about all this .

None of us really know the truth of what has been happening and probably never will


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

At the age of 11 and under ?

Any proof


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Yes Diana spoke of harry saying if William didn’t want to be king he would be king

[rusticgal]

I don’t know why everyone is getting so worked up about all this .

None of us really know the truth of what has been happening and probably never will


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


No one is getting worked up about it :shrug:….it’s just debate :shrug:

[rusticgal]

Meghan saying she didn’t think people would be lining the streets at their wedding…..:joker:


“I sat in the car and said to my mom…Look at all these people”…..


Seriously….

[Beso]

Have Harry & Meghan ever actually hurt people in the UK? Have they ever deprived poor kids of school meals? Cut people's benefits? Sent covid patients into care homes? Crashed the economy? So why is there MORE hatred for them than the politicians who did?

If you don’t like Harry and Meghan, you don’t have to watch their documentary series on Netflix. You don’t have to click on articles about them or search their names in google or on social media. You can just scroll on. You really can.



You get labelled racist if you attacked the PM and his cabinet these days, so that's why I dont associate myself with that anymore. So the only other option is to moan about harry and meghan cause that's the only other thing on the news or loose women or the scrumptious Lorraine show.

[rusticgal]

Have Harry & Meghan ever actually hurt people in the UK? Have they ever deprived poor kids of school meals? Cut people's benefits? Sent covid patients into care homes? Crashed the economy? So why is there MORE hatred for them than the politicians who did?

If you don’t like Harry and Meghan, you don’t have to watch their documentary series on Netflix. You don’t have to click on articles about them or search their names in google or on social media. You can just scroll on. You really can.


Sometimes there is a certain pleasure in seeing two people who lie and manipulate the public by digging out their own families…digging themselves a bigger grave…

[Zizu]

Yes Diana spoke of harry saying if William didn’t want to be king he would be king


That’s just self confidence not jealousy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

That’s just self confidence not jealousy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Keep making excuses
He is living his life the way he wants to live in the lap of luxury but still can’t stop himself and his attention seeking wife from playing the victim.

[jet]

From all accounts the docu is all carefully and artfully scripted to make them appear exactly how they want to be perceived, which is the hard done by, loved up perfect blameless couple who, in all of it, have done absolutely nothing wrong, obviously. NOT ONE THING was their fault.
It’s Daddy’s fault, it’s Charles, it's William, it's Kate, it’s the Courtiers, it’s the tabloids, it’s the media, it’s the racist UK, it's even the Queen’s fault…and its the Meghan show with Harry as the occasional guest speaker when she isn’t interrupting him because she hasn’t been on screen for 10 seconds. What a farce! It’s pretty hilarious really. :laugh:

[rusticgal]

From all accounts the docu is all carefully and artfully scripted to make them appear exactly how they want to be perceived, which is the hard done by, loved up perfect blameless couple who, in all of it, have done absolutely nothing wrong, obviously. NOT ONE THING was their fault.
It’s Daddy’s fault, it’s Charles, it's William, it's Kate, it’s the Courtiers, it’s the tabloids, it’s the media, it’s the racist UK, it's even the Queen’s fault…and its the Meghan show with Harry as the occasional guest speaker when she isn’t interrupting him because she hasn’t been on screen for 10 seconds. What a farce! It’s pretty hilarious really. :laugh:

Totally agree Jet. The wonderful Love Story…the scripted words out of a Hollywood movie interjected with the hate and abuse they suffered.
They haven’t once taken any responsibility…it’s everyone else’s fault. Meghan making herself out to be completely naive about the occasion of a Royal wedding…is farcical in itself. Also the whole thing is geared around Meghan being Diana…the same popularity…the same hounding of the press…it’s like you say uncomfortably hilarious.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-bfdf0020-78e9-4399-a1ed-dfc38dd00015.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-c3ef7d21-ce78-4e21-b97a-899983a652c7.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-e652ac4c-3a46-43b9-a05c-165fe72169ce.jpeg

[Beso]

From all accounts the docu is all carefully and artfully scripted to make them appear exactly how they want to be perceived, which is the hard done by, loved up perfect blameless couple who, in all of it, have done absolutely nothing wrong, obviously. NOT ONE THING was their fault.
It’s Daddy’s fault, it’s Charles, it's William, it's Kate, it’s the Courtiers, it’s the tabloids, it’s the media, it’s the racist UK, it's even the Queen’s fault…and its the Meghan show with Harry as the occasional guest speaker when she isn’t interrupting him because she hasn’t been on screen for 10 seconds. What a farce! It’s pretty hilarious really. :laugh:



The producers have also altered the queens most famous speech to make the monarchy sound worse.



No wonder they have "allegedly" tried to distance themselves a little bit from the series.

[Beso]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-e652ac4c-3a46-43b9-a05c-165fe72169ce.jpeg



:joker:

[jet]

The producers have also altered the queens most famous speech to make the monarchy sound worse.


Disgusting. :facepalm: and to think that the Queen could have still been alive now to witness all this and H&M didn't give a damn.
You don't attempt to undermine or even destroy the legacy of very elderly people you love. He didn't care. Harry has shown his desire for gimme gimme more money and kowtowing to his awful wife is all that matters to him.

[jet]

Totally agree Jet. The wonderful Love Story…the scripted words out of a Hollywood movie interjected with the hate and abuse they suffered.
They haven’t once taken any responsibility…it’s everyone else’s fault. Meghan making herself out to be completely naive about the occasion of a Royal wedding…is farcical in itself. Also the whole thing is geared around Meghan being Diana…the same popularity…the same hounding of the press…it’s like you say uncomfortably hilarious.

It really is. Meghan was just a wide - eyed ingenue who knew nuthin' about curtsying, she didn’t even know anything about Harry, not a thing! - she just wanted to know ‘was he nice?’. :laugh:
As you say, she was completely naive about Royal weddings, :rolleyes: she didn't know that people lined TWO sides of the street and was amazed that there were CROWDS there.

Nothing can be taken at face value that comes out of her mouth. Nothing....

This is what she said about Kate and William’s wedding on her TIG blog, 4 years before she married Harry:

"Grown women seem to retain this childhood fantasy. Just look at the pomp and circumstance surrounding the royal wedding and endless conversation about Princess Kate."

https://www.hellomagazine.com/brides/20210314108844/meghan-markle-comments-kate-middleton-wedding-unearthed-post/

:crazy:

[arista]

The most important
thing was pointed out on the end of NewsnightHD bbc2

William can not Reply

It is Netflix
making the money.
Of course, they paid Harry.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-464c3536-f7a0-450e-ac43-55f8e9aedbec.jpeg

[arista]

From Twitter
just the Top of Fridays Metro

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkDbahfUUAUGXDd?format=jpg&name=small

The Full Paper had to go on the Nurse Strike Thread
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-7c4d7af8-8f96-4f51-82db-7c6e39ee8601.png

[Cherie]

Has Harry explained yet why he never bothered to meet Megs father before the wedding, maybe he didnt have the transport

[bots]

at this stage it's all nonsense. If the royal family are sensible, they will just shut off all communications with Harry and Meghan and starve them of any further material. People will get bored of them pretty quickly if they keep going over stuff that happened in the past

[AnnieK]

Where is the evidence of that :shrug:

There are countless articles online by Royal Biographers that highlight it. William was always favoured as the Heir to the Throne....The Queen Mother always wanted William by her side, bever Harry. There is a reason all the "spares" go off the rails, Margaret, Andrew and now Harry....they are aware from a very young age that their presence is not as important to anyone as their older sibling. I don't care how many privileges or how much money they have, a child needs equal treatment to their siblings in order for no resentment to build. They were born in to wealth, that was always there.....they needed more love, affection and affirmation if their place in the family and nurturing and telling they were as important. I think its very telling how the 2nd siblings all apear to be the most troubled and spoilt. You can tell the difference in the Cambridge kids.....at the moment George is the most solemn whereas Charlotte and Louis are more carefree and mischievous much Harry was as a kid .....George is already being groomed for his future role whereas the others are being allowed to be kids. I think (hope) William and Kate's parenting is much different though, far more hands on and so hopefully Charlotte particulalry won't feel the "Spare".

The Queen is said to have treated them very differently.....although she loved them equally.

[thesheriff443]

There are countless articles online by Royal Biographers that highlight it. William was always favoured as the Heir to the Throne....The Queen Mother always wanted William by her side, bever Harry. There is a reason all the "spares" go off the rails, Margaret, Andrew and now Harry....they are aware from a very young age that their presence is not as important to anyone as their older sibling. I don't care how many privileges or how much money they have, a child needs equal treatment to their siblings in order for no resentment to build. They were born in to wealth, that was always there.....they needed more love, affection and affirmation if their place in the family and nurturing and telling they were as important. I think its very telling how the 2nd siblings all apear to be the most troubled and spoilt. You can tell the difference in the Cambridge kids.....at the moment George is the most solemn whereas Charlotte and Louis are more carefree and mischievous much Harry was as a kid .....George is already being groomed for his future role whereas the others are being allowed to be kids. I think (hope) William and Kate's parenting is much different though, far more hands on and so hopefully Charlotte particulalry won't feel the "Spare".

The Queen is said to have treated them very differently.....although she loved them equally.

So that’s harry given a poor me pass, what’s Meghan’s excuse?

People come from poverty and unimaginable abuse but still make a life for themselves
Harry fcuk right off with his pity party, what he needs is a smack in the mouth and told to fcuk off

Maybe he wasn’t loved enough so now he can make a difference in his own kids lives but just remember when him and harry are flying to all these awards or harry is playing polo with Meg watching someone else is taking care of his kids

It’s pile of bull sh1t

[MTVN]

There are countless articles online by Royal Biographers that highlight it. William was always favoured as the Heir to the Throne....The Queen Mother always wanted William by her side, bever Harry. There is a reason all the "spares" go off the rails, Margaret, Andrew and now Harry....they are aware from a very young age that their presence is not as important to anyone as their older sibling. I don't care how many privileges or how much money they have, a child needs equal treatment to their siblings in order for no resentment to build. They were born in to wealth, that was always there.....they needed more love, affection and affirmation if their place in the family and nurturing and telling they were as important. I think its very telling how the 2nd siblings all apear to be the most troubled and spoilt. You can tell the difference in the Cambridge kids.....at the moment George is the most solemn whereas Charlotte and Louis are more carefree and mischievous much Harry was as a kid .....George is already being groomed for his future role whereas the others are being allowed to be kids. I think (hope) William and Kate's parenting is much different though, far more hands on and so hopefully Charlotte particulalry won't feel the "Spare".

The Queen is said to have treated them very differently.....although she loved them equally.

I find them both pretty insufferable but that's a good point tbf

[Swan]

There are countless articles online by Royal Biographers that highlight it. William was always favoured as the Heir to the Throne....The Queen Mother always wanted William by her side, bever Harry. There is a reason all the "spares" go off the rails, Margaret, Andrew and now Harry....they are aware from a very young age that their presence is not as important to anyone as their older sibling. I don't care how many privileges or how much money they have, a child needs equal treatment to their siblings in order for no resentment to build. They were born in to wealth, that was always there.....they needed more love, affection and affirmation if their place in the family and nurturing and telling they were as important. I think its very telling how the 2nd siblings all apear to be the most troubled and spoilt. You can tell the difference in the Cambridge kids.....at the moment George is the most solemn whereas Charlotte and Louis are more carefree and mischievous much Harry was as a kid .....George is already being groomed for his future role whereas the others are being allowed to be kids. I think (hope) William and Kate's parenting is much different though, far more hands on and so hopefully Charlotte particulalry won't feel the "Spare".

The Queen is said to have treated them very differently.....although she loved them equally.

Just replying to the bit about Andrew. I've seen a couple of interviews with ex security in the Palace, and both guys said (one of the guys worked pretty close for Andrew, not actually with him, if that makes sense) that Andrew was clearly the Queen's favourite. He would get away with being a complete sh!t to staff, be allowed questionable guests, and that the general feeling was the Queen would turn a blind eye to his awful behaviour. I mean he got away with so much, i can believe she favoured him.

[AnnieK]

So that’s harry given a poor me pass, what’s Meghan’s excuse?

People come from poverty and unimaginable abuse but still make a life for themselves
Harry fcuk right off with his pity party, what he needs is a smack in the mouth and told to fcuk off

Maybe he wasn’t loved enough so now he can make a difference in his own kids lives but just remember when him and harry are flying to all these awards or harry is playing polo with Meg watching someone else is taking care of his kids

It’s pile of bull sh1t

Not giving anyone a free pass, just pointing out some pretty relevant points in the behaviour of the Royals in general and how they treat the children of the Heir or Monarch.

Not sure what you are saying about other people watching his kids - the same can be said about William and Kate's children. They all have nannies :shrug: As do a lot of parents.

He really doesn't need a smack in the mouth - violence doesn't solve anything - you really don't have to take any notice of him if that's what you want as nothing he says will have ANY impact on your life.

[thesheriff443]

I find them both pretty insufferable but that's a good point tbf

Yes like when he was 21 in America shagging a 32 year old mother of two that boy as only had a life of misery, so yourself a favour and think about what you are writing.

If you want to think about how life is bad for someone think about the parents of those kids who just died falling through ice or a 4 year old girl who drowned in a public swimming pool while her mum took her two other kids to the toilet

[thesheriff443]

I find them both pretty insufferable but that's a good point tbf

Yes like when he was 21 in America shagging a 32 year old mother of two that boy as only had a life of misery, so yourself a favour and think about what you are writing.

If you want to think about how life is bad for someone think about the parents of those kids who just died falling through ice or a 4 year old girl who drowned in a public swimming pool while her mum took her two other kids to the toilet

[thesheriff443]

I find them both pretty insufferable but that's a good point tbf

Yes like when he was 21 in America shagging a 32 year old mother of two that boy as only had a life of misery, so yourself a favour and think about what you are writing.

If you want to think about how life is bad for someone think about the parents of those kids who just died falling through ice or a 4 year old girl who drowned in a public swimming pool while her mum took her two other kids to the toilet

[AnnieK]

Just replying to the bit about Andrew. I've seen a couple of interviews with ex security in the Palace, and both guys said (one of the guys worked pretty close for Andrew, not actually with him, if that makes sense) that Andrew was clearly the Queen's favourite. He would get away with being a complete sh!t to staff, be allowed questionable guests, and that the general feeling was the Queen would turn a blind eye to his awful behaviour. I mean he got away with so much, i can believe she favoured him.

He was by far her favourite child - that is very well known. The "Firm" is very different from just her though. She is said to have loved both William and Harry equally but treated them very differently - quite possibly turning a blind eye to Harry's indiscretions too but it doesn't stop the wider family, courtiers etc treating him as less important and that is the part that affects a child growing up. The actions of the many far outweigh the actions of the few

[AnnieK]

Yes like when he was 21 in America shagging a 32 year old mother of two that boy as only had a life of misery, so yourself a favour and think about what you are writing.

If you want to think about how life is bad for someone think about the parents of those kids who just died falling through ice or a 4 year old girl who drowned in a public swimming pool while her mum took her two other kids to the toilet

Those things are terrible but have nothing to do with this discussion. There will always be people who are worse off than others in this world but you can't "win" a debate by saying that :shrug:

[Cherie]

There are countless articles online by Royal Biographers that highlight it. William was always favoured as the Heir to the Throne....The Queen Mother always wanted William by her side, bever Harry. There is a reason all the "spares" go off the rails, Margaret, Andrew and now Harry....they are aware from a very young age that their presence is not as important to anyone as their older sibling. I don't care how many privileges or how much money they have, a child needs equal treatment to their siblings in order for no resentment to build. They were born in to wealth, that was always there.....they needed more love, affection and affirmation if their place in the family and nurturing and telling they were as important. I think its very telling how the 2nd siblings all apear to be the most troubled and spoilt. You can tell the difference in the Cambridge kids.....at the moment George is the most solemn whereas Charlotte and Louis are more carefree and mischievous much Harry was as a kid .....George is already being groomed for his future role whereas the others are being allowed to be kids. I think (hope) William and Kate's parenting is much different though, far more hands on and so hopefully Charlotte particulalry won't feel the "Spare".

The Queen is said to have treated them very differently.....although she loved them equally.


Sorry but I just don't buy it, I think Harry was SPOILED after Diana died and he was happy to be the spare and could let loose, the oldest child in any family tends to be the sensible one and the children who come after are given much more freedom as the eldest generally tests the water for the rest, its only in later life he has become bitter about it egged on by his awful wife

[Cherie]

Every parent in the world makes mistakes there is no perfect parent out there, the good thing for 99% of us is that our kids will never try to humiliate or embarrass us for money `

[thesheriff443]

Those things are terrible but have nothing to do with this discussion. There will always be people who are worse off than others in this world but you can't "win" a debate by saying that :shrug:

I can because there are people who are not living just surviving being tortured in their own head every day
Then you have a spoiled bastard claiming their life is hard
Give me a fcuking break

He has been paid millions to cry about how bad his life was and they both have layed it on extra thick

Look at that prick before Meghan came along he was happy, happy with his family happy being a royal happy with his brother and sister inlaw but when he got with that chancer things fell apart

[AnnieK]

Sorry but I just don't buy it, I think Harry was SPOILED after Diana died and he was happy to be the spare and could let loose, the oldest child in any family tends to be the sensible one and the children who come after are given much more freedom as the eldest generally tests the water for the rest, its only in later life he has become bitter about it egged on by his awful wife

That's fine - the articles are there but you don't have to buy it. :shrug: You asked for evidence and there are a number of articles and comments by trusted royal commentators was my whole point of quoting you.

Of course he was happier and carefree when he was younger(aren't most of us?) - as was Margaret and as was Andrew. With maturity comes retrospect and then you can look back and see things were not quite as rosy as you believed at the time.

I am sure he has been egged on by Meghan - she is American and most Americans have all been in therapy for years and look for reasons to blame their behaviour and actions on :laugh:

[AnnieK]

I can because there are people who are not living just surviving being tortured in their own head every day
Then you have a spoiled bastard claiming their life is hard
Give me a fcuking break

He has been paid millions to cry about how bad his life was and they both have layed it on extra thick

Look at that prick before Meghan came along he was happy, happy with his family happy being a royal happy with his brother and sister inlaw but when he got with that chancer things fell apart

You are obviously very angry about him, judging by your language so I will leave it there with this discussion with you.

[Cherie]

That's fine - the articles are there but you don't have to buy it. :shrug: You asked for evidence and there are a number of articles and comments by trusted royal commentators was my whole point of quoting you.

Of course he was happier and carefree when he was younger(aren't most of us?) - as was Margaret and as was Andrew. With maturity comes retrospect and then you can look back and see things were not quite as rosy as you believed at the time.

I am sure he has been egged on by Meghan - she is American and most Americans have all been in therapy for years and look for reasons to blame their behaviour and actions on :laugh:

This made me laugh from the carol concert last night

The King, Queen Consort, Prince of Wales, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, Princess of Wales and Countess of Wessex were pictured front and centre at the concert, holding candles while singing from the same hymn sheet.

:joker:

[thesheriff443]

You are obviously very angry about him, judging by your language so I will leave it there with this discussion with you.

I’m not the Incredible Hulk angry
It’s a piss take, if you are getting paid 80 odd million you got to spice it up

Real people with real problems get my upmost respect the poor me of the worlds can do one.

[Swan]

So is their Netflix thing done now? If the ratings are decent im sure Netflix will look for a 2nd season.

Also, the timing for this release is pretty awful, that's why sympathy is at an all time low. I mean, we live in a funny old world!

Energy prices crippling people (coldest snap we've had in years too, a cruel irony)
Strikes all over the place
Services cut daily
All that and it's the most expensive time of the year

None of that is Harry and Meghan's fault, but Christ, if they're expecting sympathy all things considered, then they're obviously deluded.

[bots]

i don't think Harry and Meghans main target audience is the UK. Everything they do is to maximise their earning potential in the USA. Everything they say is targeting american sensitivities. The press here like some juicy gossip, but the majority of it is just not of interest to the uk news consumers

[Swan]

i don't think Harry and Meghans main target audience is the UK. Everything they do is to maximise their earning potential in the USA. Everything they say is targeting american sensitivities. The press here like some juicy gossip, but the majority of it is just not of interest to the uk news consumers

California, and maybe parts of New York in the east, but over all the bulk of America doesn't care a toss about them and never will.

[Beso]

There are countless articles online by Royal Biographers that highlight it. William was always favoured as the Heir to the Throne....The Queen Mother always wanted William by her side, bever Harry. There is a reason all the "spares" go off the rails, Margaret, Andrew and now Harry....they are aware from a very young age that their presence is not as important to anyone as their older sibling. I don't care how many privileges or how much money they have, a child needs equal treatment to their siblings in order for no resentment to build. They were born in to wealth, that was always there.....they needed more love, affection and affirmation if their place in the family and nurturing and telling they were as important. I think its very telling how the 2nd siblings all apear to be the most troubled and spoilt. You can tell the difference in the Cambridge kids.....at the moment George is the most solemn whereas Charlotte and Louis are more carefree and mischievous much Harry was as a kid .....George is already being groomed for his future role whereas the others are being allowed to be kids. I think (hope) William and Kate's parenting is much different though, far more hands on and so hopefully Charlotte particulalry won't feel the "Spare".

The Queen is said to have treated them very differently.....although she loved them equally.




Princess Anne's, Edwards and surprisingly Andrew's kids all seem fine with each other.

[bots]

Princess Anne's, Edwards and surprisingly Andrew's kids all seem fine with each other.

none of them are constantly in the spotlight though, if they were, i'm sure there would be just as many stories about them.

Does anyone remember the story of harry as a youth, when he was found drunk as a skunk lying on the pavement? :laugh:

[Beso]

none of them are constantly in the spotlight though, if they were, i'm sure there would be just as many stories about them.

Does anyone remember the story of harry as a youth, when he was found drunk as a skunk lying on the pavement? :laugh:

Andrew's kids were always scrutinised and called names by the press.

[Liam-]

You’ve got to love the way people believe everything that’s written about these two in the press, because it’s coming from so called ‘experts’ and they’re perfectly fine with anybody and their mother writing anything they want about them, but yet the actual people involved with everything speak out about their experiences as they lived them and they’re the ones that these weirdos can’t trust or believe? Nah, I’ll trust the people with real lived experience over someone like Tominey who’s entire career is based purely on protecting the royal family at any cost.

Also, this whole ‘they’re milking it for their own gain cause they’ve got nothing else!!! :(‘ they’re telling their story from their perspective, about their own experiences, it’s down to them to do that in any way they want too, if anybody is milking them and their existence it’s the media, the multiple random people who’ve written articles or books about them filled with conspiracy theories or made up stories, they’re the ones milking it because they need to, it gives them ratings and money and 5 minutes of fame because as we’ve seen, peoples hatred of the pair leads them to consuming every single piece of media about them, despite proclaiming to not care what they say or do, it’s a business model to spread hate about Harry and Meghan and it’s working

[AnnieK]

Princess Anne's, Edwards and surprisingly Andrew's kids all seem fine with each other.

Again, though - they were not part of the Heir bloodline so nothing was expected of any of them so they will have all been treated equally as siblings.

[bots]

like i said earlier, Harry and Meghan are concentrating on income from the usa, thats what the Oprah interview, netflix and the books are all about. Culturally, the usa is anti monarchy, except when it matches with their Hollywood royalty, which is why Diana was popular there. Everything is about H&M making money in America, they are done with the UK

[Beso]

Again, though - they were not part of the Heir bloodline so nothing was expected of any of them so they will have all been treated equally as siblings.

They definitely had different "in lines" to the throne though, just like william and harry did.

I think you've believed too much you've read tbh.

[user104658]

California, and maybe parts of New York in the east, but over all the bulk of America doesn't care a toss about them and never will.

I mean yes but let's not forget that California and New York (state) combined have roughly the same population as the entire UK... and California alone is bigger than most countries.

[AnnieK]

They definitely had different "in lines" to the throne though, just like william and harry did.

I think you've believed too much you've read tbh.

What??? For any of those children to be anywhere close to being in line for the throne something catastrophic would have had to have happened. They were not in the direct bloodline.

I believe too much of what I've read - ok. Are you saying that also to everyone who has an opinion on this as that's the only way anyone can possibly form an opinion on anything to do with the Royal family - yourself and Jet (as the Oracle) included :shrug:

[Beso]

What??? For any of those children to be anywhere close to being in line for the throne something catastrophic would have had to have happened. They were not in the direct bloodline.

I believe too much of what I've read - ok. Are you saying that also to everyone who has an opinion on this as that's the only way anyone can possibly form an opinion on anything to do with the Royal family - yourself and Jet (as the Oracle) included :shrug:

I prefer to watch rather than read my royal news.
So TV is my outlet for royal news. Too many papers have too many different opinions for my liking.

[Glenn.]

You’ve got to love the way people believe everything that’s written about these two in the press, because it’s coming from so called ‘experts’ and they’re perfectly fine with anybody and their mother writing anything they want about them, but yet the actual people involved with everything speak out about their experiences as they lived them and they’re the ones that these weirdos can’t trust or believe? Nah, I’ll trust the people with real lived experience over someone like Tominey who’s entire career is based purely on protecting the royal family at any cost.

Also, this whole ‘they’re milking it for their own gain cause they’ve got nothing else!!! :(‘ they’re telling their story from their perspective, about their own experiences, it’s down to them to do that in any way they want too, if anybody is milking them and their existence it’s the media, the multiple random people who’ve written articles or books about them filled with conspiracy theories or made up stories, they’re the ones milking it because they need to, it gives them ratings and money and 5 minutes of fame because as we’ve seen, peoples hatred of the pair leads them to consuming every single piece of media about them, despite proclaiming to not care what they say or do, it’s a business model to spread hate about Harry and Meghan and it’s working

I thought this while watching it.

I honestly don’t know how and level headed rational person can watch this and not think ‘oh hang on a minute maybe things aren’t what they seem’

[AnnieK]

I prefer to watch rather than read my royal news.
So TV is my outlet for royal news. Too many papers have too many different opinions for my liking.

:laugh: They are still journalists and royal reporters - the exact same ones in many cases that I am talking about who put their words in print.

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FkFehxgWIAAdnoF?format=jpg&name=large

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/Ann90335924/status/1603599815496986624?s=20&t=Vhs8aw0jO_4fgnd-P16crg

#MeghanExposingHerself

[Cherie]

https://twitter.com/Ann90335924/status/1603599815496986624?s=20&t=Vhs8aw0jO_4fgnd-P16crg

#MeghanExposingHerself

did she say you couldn't wear the same colour as other Royals? what a weird thing to say

From the Guardian

Among the various claims to come from Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Netflix documentary – now the streaming service’s most watched ever – was Markle’s assertion that household staff advised her against wearing the same colour as other royals.

“You can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty, if there’s a group event,”said Markle. “But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the other more senior members of the family.”

That episode aired last week. On Thursday evening, multiple royals attended their Together at Christmas carol service at Westminster Abbey – in conspicuously matching burgundy.

Kate Middleton wore the colour head-to-toe: earrings from Accessorize, a v-necked coat from Eponine, and Gianvito Rossi heels – and carried gloves and a clutch bag in the same tone. Her daughter, Princess Charlotte, sister, Pippa and cousin-in-law, Zara, were all dressed in similar-hued coats. Princess Charlotte’s wool coat with Peter Pan collar is from Trotters Heritage and almost soon to be sold out. Prince William and Mike Tindall completed the reddish-purple set. As collective rebuttals go, it was a bold one.

[Crimson Dynamo]

did she say you couldn't wear the same colour as other Royals? what a weird thing to say

From the Guardian

Among the various claims to come from Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Netflix documentary – now the streaming service’s most watched ever – was Markle’s assertion that household staff advised her against wearing the same colour as other royals.

“You can’t ever wear the same colour as Her Majesty, if there’s a group event,”said Markle. “But then you also should never be wearing the same colour as one of the other more senior members of the family.”

That episode aired last week. On Thursday evening, multiple royals attended their Together at Christmas carol service at Westminster Abbey – in conspicuously matching burgundy.

Kate Middleton wore the colour head-to-toe: earrings from Accessorize, a v-necked coat from Eponine, and Gianvito Rossi heels – and carried gloves and a clutch bag in the same tone. Her daughter, Princess Charlotte, sister, Pippa and cousin-in-law, Zara, were all dressed in similar-hued coats. Princess Charlotte’s wool coat with Peter Pan collar is from Trotters Heritage and almost soon to be sold out. Prince William and Mike Tindall completed the reddish-purple set. As collective rebuttals go, it was a bold one.

her life is a lie to herself so telling lies is natural and normal

[The Slim Reaper]

Yes like when he was 21 in America shagging a 32 year old mother of two that boy as only had a life of misery, so yourself a favour and think about what you are writing.

If you want to think about how life is bad for someone think about the parents of those kids who just died falling through ice or a 4 year old girl who drowned in a public swimming pool while her mum took her two other kids to the toilet

Man had sex so should be happy is a brilliant self-own.

[Jordan.]

https://twitter.com/Ann90335924/status/1603599815496986624?s=20&t=Vhs8aw0jO_4fgnd-P16crg

#MeghanExposingHerself

Kate the bully, the only time she shows a personality.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Kate the bully, the only time she shows a personality.

so weak

https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/ang.png

[jet]

Harry and Meghan get called out by High Commissioner to Gabon, the Commonwealth‘s newest member …

” To think we would sign up blindly to be vassals to another Empire is to suggest we are foolish….many in Gabon feel patronised by these remarks “

It is racism to assume an African nation cannot make decisions about its collective future ….without the judgement of a white saviour Prince and his wife.

[rusticgal]

The hypocrisy….Meghan and Harry saying the Royals lied for their agenda. The media lie for their agenda….Meghan and Harry lied 17 times to Oprah for their agenda…:joker:

A total farce…all one sided because they know they won’t get questioned and held to account.

[jet]

The hypocrisy….Meghan and Harry saying the Royals lied for their agenda. The media lie for their agenda….Meghan and Harry lied 17 times to Oprah for their agenda…:joker:

A total farce…all one sided because they know they won’t get questioned and held to account.

They must be the most hypocritical and un- self aware couple who have ever lived.

Royal correspondent fact checkers have said the Netflix series has upped the lies and deliberate distortions to over 60 now.
:eek:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Netflix Shares Sink After Report of Weaker Ad Demand

Shares of Netflix took a hit Thursday, after a report that the company’s new
advertising tier has not hit its viewership targets.

The stock closed Thursday at $290.41, after dropping about 9 percent
throughout the day.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/netflix-shares-sink-after-report-of-weaker-ad-demand-1235283058/

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article22618067.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200c/0_Good-Morning-Britain-TV-show-London-UK-02-Sep-2020.jpg

[jet]

I honestly don’t know how and level headed rational person can watch this and not think ‘oh hang on a minute maybe things aren’t what they seem’

It's great that you've had your eyes opened at last Glenn. :hehe:

[Jordan.]

Netflix Shares Sink After Report of Weaker Ad Demand

Shares of Netflix took a hit Thursday, after a report that the company’s new
advertising tier has not hit its viewership targets.

The stock closed Thursday at $290.41, after dropping about 9 percent
throughout the day.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/netflix-shares-sink-after-report-of-weaker-ad-demand-1235283058/

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article22618067.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200c/0_Good-Morning-Britain-TV-show-London-UK-02-Sep-2020.jpg

Fitting use of a Piss Moron image when talking about not hitting viewership targets :joker::joker:

[Oliver_W]

To be fair, one mockumentary underperforming wouldn't be the sole cause of Netflix not meeting its targets.

[Crimson Dynamo]

To be fair, one mockumentary underperforming wouldn't be the sole cause of Netflix not meeting its targets.

its an example of poor choices for "big series"

a perfect example

[Cherie]

Harry and Meghan get called out by High Commissioner to Gabon, the Commonwealth‘s newest member …

” To think we would sign up blindly to be vassals to another Empire is to suggest we are foolish….many in Gabon feel patronised by these remarks “

It is racism to assume an African nation cannot make decisions about its collective future ….without the judgement of a white saviour Prince and his wife.


Ooop

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-00de42cc-db0c-4de1-90d2-41ff422c21bf.png

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-bb15e4b6-0a86-4d7e-a35c-c632e91a9fd5.png

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-bb15e4b6-0a86-4d7e-a35c-c632e91a9fd5.png

so that Hamzat is a wringer?

[hijaxers]

so that Hamzat is a wringer?

Didn't he have the same dance partner for years ? sure i read that.

[GoldHeart]

There's no coming back from this ,well and truly severed links with the family.

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11543863/SARAH-VINE-week-said-felt-sorry-Harry-fool-am.html

SARAH VINE: Last week I said I felt sorry for Harry. What a fool I am! The real arrogant, bitter, vicious Prince appears to be a rather nasty piece of work… and it's horrible to witness

Excerpt:
planned all this right from the start…..
……Moreover, much of it pre-dates the alleged campaign of hate and misinformation against them. It's almost as though, right from the start, they had a certain narrative they wanted to shape — and that documenting everything fed into their narcissistic little plan].
—----------------
This is what many of us have been saying all along…they had no intention of being working members of the family and wanted to make loads of money with media deals and be big noises in the US on the back of that country's love for Diana and their Royal titles.

They start filming private moments - only those that will fit in with their agenda - the many excuses to enable their exit and make it everybody’s fault but their own. This is what the interviews and ‘reality’ shows are all about. They are furious that their excuses weren't believed by the majority and are desperately trying to justify it all with their, once again, self indulgent, narcissistic, one sided scripted accounts of how horrible everyone was and how naive and hard done by and beyond reproach they were.
That’s why it isn’t working out for them, it’s all poor me me me self important fakery.

[Beso]

It's as if harry knows charles isnt his dad.

For me that's the true reason for all this.

[arista]

SkyNews Text :
[Harry and Meghan want a royal summit
to address the issues they raised in
their Netflix documentary series,
The Sunday Times reports.]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-3827849a-be56-48ff-9240-6e023471931d.jpeg

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-64d3dfb6-7a93-43e4-82c6-ac5bea260045.jpeg

[Cherie]

There has been no response, so the spoiled brats are having another tantrum, for a pair who wanted to leave Royal life behind they watch everything that is going on like hawks, they have lost the plot completely

[Jordan.]

OMG the brats demanding an apology because a "source" said so & after they just made an entire documentary about how the tabloids make up utter bs, what madness.

[thesheriff443]

OMG the brats demanding an apology because a "source" said so & after they just made an entire documentary about how the tabloids make up utter bs, what madness.

They would be quick to sue if it wasn’t true.

[jet]

There has been no response, so the spoiled brats are having another tantrum, for a pair who wanted to leave Royal life behind they watch everything that is going on like hawks, they have lost the plot completely

Yes, they were goading the Palace into an angry reaction and the dignified silence has them fuming. The attention seekers can't bear to be ignored.

[Cherie]

Surely Harry can’t want another summit given he was terrified at the last one :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

Yes, they were goading the Palace into an angry reaction and the dignified silence has them fuming. The attention seekers can't bear to be ignored.

It’s all they have got jet, if they didn’t have the links to the royals they would be little fishes in the big American pond.

[thesheriff443]

Surely Harry can’t want another summit given he was terrified at the last one :laugh:

This time he will take andrews teddy bears in with him

[Glenn.]

Yes, they were goading the Palace into an angry reaction and the dignified silence has them fuming. The attention seekers can't bear to be ignored.


imagine still basing your opinions on what you read on the front of a tabloid :joker:

[arista]

Let Harry/Meghan come
over, but without a Netflix Camera crew.


That would be more fair

[rusticgal]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11543863/SARAH-VINE-week-said-felt-sorry-Harry-fool-am.html

SARAH VINE: Last week I said I felt sorry for Harry. What a fool I am! The real arrogant, bitter, vicious Prince appears to be a rather nasty piece of work… and it's horrible to witness

Excerpt:
planned all this right from the start…..
……Moreover, much of it pre-dates the alleged campaign of hate and misinformation against them. It's almost as though, right from the start, they had a certain narrative they wanted to shape — and that documenting everything fed into their narcissistic little plan].
—----------------
This is what many of us have been saying all along…they had no intention of being working members of the family and wanted to make loads of money with media deals and be big noises in the US on the back of that country's love for Diana and their Royal titles.

They start filming private moments - only those that will fit in with their agenda - the many excuses to enable their exit and make it everybody’s fault but their own. This is what the interviews and ‘reality’ shows are all about. They are furious that their excuses weren't believed by the majority and are desperately trying to justify it all with their, once again, self indulgent, narcissistic, one sided scripted accounts of how horrible everyone was and how naive and hard done by and beyond reproach they were.
That’s why it isn’t working out for them, it’s all poor me me me self important fakery.


:clap2:....this is so true. So much footage of their own before Netflix even came on the scene. I really couldnt agree more with the statement above...Meghan saying she was complimented by the Captain 'for all she had done for his country'...then hugged by a Security guard as she landed in Canada as she told him 'I did everything I could'....such utter bollocks. She wanted the best of both worlds and when they didnt get what they wanted they started their campaign.
Bitter and jealous to the core....

[Glenn.]

:joker: :joker: :joker: :joker:

[rusticgal]

Bless...there is nothing worse than goading for a reaction only to be met with Silence...:laugh:

[thesheriff443]

Bless...there is nothing worse than goading for a reaction only to be met with Silence...:laugh:

So so true.

[Kazanne]

They would be quick to sue if it wasn’t true.

Yes, and funny when these papers / media are slagging the government off or someone they dont like, its all suddenly so true :laugh:

[Alf]

A bit of Andrew Lawrence. I haven't posted none for a while and I expect you miss him.


zFZf1VpbCvs

[Cherie]

A bit of Andrew Lawrence. I haven't posted none for a while and I expect you miss him.


zFZf1VpbCvs

Hard to argue with that

[Crimson Dynamo]

A bit of Andrew Lawrence. I haven't posted none for a while and I expect you miss him.


zFZf1VpbCvs

amen

[rusticgal]

A bit of Andrew Lawrence. I haven't posted none for a while and I expect you miss him.


zFZf1VpbCvs



Brilliant…

[hijaxers]

Talk about hit the nail right on the head !

[jet]

A bit of Andrew Lawrence. I haven't posted none for a while and I expect you miss him.


zFZf1VpbCvs

Excellent! :clap1:

[jet]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1710870/meghan-markle-prince-harry-rishi-sunak-conservatives-netflix-ofcom-latest-royal-news-ont

Meghan and Harry documentary sparks new law for Netflix regulation amid accuracy concerns

Under a proposed law, broadcasting regulator Ofcom will be given new powers to regulate Netflix and other streaming services for the first time, amid media questioning about the accuracy of the Harry and Meghan documentary.
Michelle Donelan, the Culture Secretary, is hoping to bring forward the Media Bill next year to give Ofcom new legal powers to regulate streaming services not based in the UK. Ofcom would also be allowed to impose fines up to £250,000 or an amount up to five percent of their revenue, whichever would be higher.....

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11554417/Britain-NOT-racist-country-says-Rishi-Sunak-wake-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-claims.html

Britain is NOT a racist country says Rishi Sunak as PM defends the monarchy in wake of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle claims

Rishi Sunak today insisted Britain is not a racist country in the wake of Prince Harry and Meghan's claims in their Netflix documentary.
The Prime Minister also defended the Royal Family following attacks made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in the couple's docuseries with the streaming giant.
Speaking in Riga, Latvia, after attending a meeting of some of Britain's military allies, Mr Sunak said he was 'really proud' of the UK.

And he described his 'enormous privilege' in being able to champion institutions such as the monarchy while abroad.....

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11554417/Britain-NOT-racist-country-says-Rishi-Sunak-wake-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-claims.html

Britain is NOT a racist country says Rishi Sunak as PM defends the monarchy in wake of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle claims

Rishi Sunak today insisted Britain is not a racist country in the wake of Prince Harry and Meghan's claims in their Netflix documentary.
The Prime Minister also defended the Royal Family following attacks made by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in the couple's docuseries with the streaming giant.
Speaking in Riga, Latvia, after attending a meeting of some of Britain's military allies, Mr Sunak said he was 'really proud' of the UK.

And he described his 'enormous privilege' in being able to champion institutions such as the monarchy while abroad.....

get them telt Rishi

[Glenn.]

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has revealed that he experienced racism growing up in the UK but the country has made incredible progress since then in confronting the issue. The British Indian leader was speaking to reporters in the wake of a racism row at Bucking-ham Palace, which saw the resignation of Prince William's godmother after it emerged that the senior palace aide had repeatedly questioned a black British charity work-er about where she was “really from”.

When asked about the controversy, Sunak said it would not be right for him to comment on palace matters and pointed out that action had been taken.

“It would not be right for me to comment on matters to do with the royal palace, although as we have seen they’ve acknowledged what’s happened and made an apology for it,” he said.

He said: “As I have talked about in the past, I have experienced racism in my life. But what I am pleased to say is some of the things that I experienced when I was a kid and a young person, I don’t think would happen today because our country has made incredible progress in tackling racism. “But the job is never done. And that’s why whenever we see it, we must confront it. And, it’s right that we continually learn the lessons and move to a better future.”

Was only last week no? Wants to make up his mind. Or maybe the Daily Fail need to stop printing lies

[Crimson Dynamo]

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has revealed that he experienced racism growing up in the UK but the country has made incredible progress since then in confronting the issue. The British Indian leader was speaking to reporters in the wake of a racism row at Bucking-ham Palace, which saw the resignation of Prince William's godmother after it emerged that the senior palace aide had repeatedly questioned a black British charity work-er about where she was “really from”.

When asked about the controversy, Sunak said it would not be right for him to comment on palace matters and pointed out that action had been taken.

“It would not be right for me to comment on matters to do with the royal palace, although as we have seen they’ve acknowledged what’s happened and made an apology for it,” he said.

He said: “As I have talked about in the past, I have experienced racism in my life. But what I am pleased to say is some of the things that I experienced when I was a kid and a young person, I don’t think would happen today because our country has made incredible progress in tackling racism. “But the job is never done. And that’s why whenever we see it, we must confront it. And, it’s right that we continually learn the lessons and move to a better future.”

Was only last week no? Wants to make up his mind. Or maybe the Daily Fail need to stop printing lies


go and live in Africa, China and India where racism is rife and 100x worse than the uk

thank God he lives in the world's most tolerant country

the UK

:clap1:

[jet]

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has revealed that he experienced racism growing up in the UK but the country has made incredible progress since then in confronting the issue. The British Indian leader was speaking to reporters in the wake of a racism row at Bucking-ham Palace, which saw the resignation of Prince William's godmother after it emerged that the senior palace aide had repeatedly questioned a black British charity work-er about where she was “really from”.

When asked about the controversy, Sunak said it would not be right for him to comment on palace matters and pointed out that action had been taken.

“It would not be right for me to comment on matters to do with the royal palace, although as we have seen they’ve acknowledged what’s happened and made an apology for it,” he said.

He said: “As I have talked about in the past, I have experienced racism in my life. But what I am pleased to say is some of the things that I experienced when I was a kid and a young person, I don’t think would happen today because our country has made incredible progress in tackling racism. “But the job is never done. And that’s why whenever we see it, we must confront it. And, it’s right that we continually learn the lessons and move to a better future.”

Was only last week no? Wants to make up his mind. Or maybe the Daily Fail need to stop printing lies

Would you post the link please?

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11545683/Harry-Meghans-exhausting-endurance-test-documentary-scored-lowly-43-Rotten-Tomatoes.html?ico=related-replace

Harry and Meghan's 'exhausting endurance test' Netflix docuseries scores just 43% on Rotten Tomatoes as viewers blast 'cringeworthy' Netflix show

Harry and Meghan's docuseries has been scored at a lowly 43 percent on Rotten Tomatoes as critics in the United States rounded on the show after Netflix released the highly-anticipated second half on Thursday.

But while the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are relying on the US market to warm to them, the docuseries was described as a 'cringeworthy' 'exhausting endurance test' by outlets. One described it as 'going disastrously' for the couple…..

[Beso]

Sunak just reminds me of some bloke who would wipe down everything you had touched if you were in fixing his telly

I bet he has lots of white marble in his other houses.

[rusticgal]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11545683/Harry-Meghans-exhausting-endurance-test-documentary-scored-lowly-43-Rotten-Tomatoes.html?ico=related-replace

Harry and Meghan's 'exhausting endurance test' Netflix docuseries scores just 43% on Rotten Tomatoes as viewers blast 'cringeworthy' Netflix show

Harry and Meghan's docuseries has been scored at a lowly 43 percent on Rotten Tomatoes as critics in the United States rounded on the show after Netflix released the highly-anticipated second half on Thursday.

But while the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are relying on the US market to warm to them, the docuseries was described as a 'cringeworthy' 'exhausting endurance test' by outlets. One described it as 'going disastrously' for the couple…..


In between the unsubstantiated attacks…it was nauseating.

[Beso]

I hate her that much I cant bring myself to watch the show..

[Glenn.]

Go outside for a walk or something then

[Beso]

Go outside for a walk or something then

I wasnt planning on watching it at this very moment..:shrug:

[Glenn.]

cool

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/130/590x/Meghan-Markle-and-Prince-Harry-1252385.jpg?r=1583738013633

"Now they have typecast themselves as perpetual victims, and cashed in on
their bust-up with the royal family, it is going to be very difficult for them to
escape from that mould. Much though they might aspire to establish
themselves as inspirational global leaders, their value is as former royals with a
grievance. What people have come to expect from them is sensational
accusations against Harry’s father and brother, a modern-day Greek tragedy in
regular instalments. The irony is that a couple who lose no opportunity to blast
the tabloids have condemned themselves to be tabloid fare for ever after. "


No wonder high-minded liberals like Jacinda Ardern want nothing to do with
them.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/21/now-not-even-woke-queen-jacinda-ardern-wants-anything-do-harry/

[jet]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1710870/meghan-markle-prince-harry-rishi-sunak-conservatives-netflix-ofcom-latest-royal-news-ont

Meghan and Harry documentary sparks new law for Netflix regulation amid accuracy concerns

Under a proposed law, broadcasting regulator Ofcom will be given new powers to regulate Netflix and other streaming services for the first time, amid media questioning about the accuracy of the Harry and Meghan documentary.
Michelle Donelan, the Culture Secretary, is hoping to bring forward the Media Bill next year to give Ofcom new legal powers to regulate streaming services not based in the UK. Ofcom would also be allowed to impose fines up to £250,000 or an amount up to five percent of their revenue, whichever would be higher.....

Tory MPs have welcomed the Government’s plans and said they could put a stop to misleading statements from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in future, including their use of stock footage.

Bob Seely, a Conservative MP who is planning a parliamentary bill to strip the couple of their titles, said new rules would mean the couple would “not be allowed to get away with some of the obvious misrepresentation in the use of images, claiming the images were representing one thing when in fact they were entirely unconnected with Meghan and Harry”.

“I do think on principle that Netflix and other video streaming services should have the same ethical standards as other broadcasters like the BBC,” he said.

Tim Loughton MP, who has criticised the Duke and Duchess for their broadsides against other members of the Royal family, said the documentary had used “highly questionable” editing and should have been regulated in the same way as content from a broadcaster like the BBC, ITV or Channel 4.

“They should be subject to the same criteria,” he said. “That’s the problem with anything that’s now streamed or anything that’s now available on the internet.

“They’re not subject to the same publishing criteria as if it were a hard copy or in the terrestrial media.”
--------------------
The Sussexes' Netflix documentary have been accused of "spreading misinformation", while H&M themselves say they are passionate in tackling misinformation. Only about themselves, of course. Their usual typical hypocrisy.

[GoldHeart]

You see the problem I have is ....

There never seems to be acknowledgement that garbage was ever written about Meghan,I'm as yet to get a response as to why the media thought it was ok to say Meghan is "straight outta Compton" ? . She isn't from Compton. And why was there all the tacky comparisons with Kate ? .

Or Piers Morgan's unhealthy obsession with Meghan,which is borderline creep fest , she's basically keeping him in a job .

But now I don't understand the end goal with Meghan & Harry's mission, the netflix fiasco sounds like a mess & Harry's book .....will just cause more upset with his family . So I just feel like it's gone so far now ,to the point where there's no hope or any clear conclusion. It seems more it's all about attention & money .

Meghan's family haven't helped matters ,her dad & sister have cashed in majorly . And now it's all tit for tat.

It's basically so out of control now ,that I don't see the light at the end of the tunnel for anyone involved.

People say they're fed up of them ,yet they keep giving them the limelight by talking about them on different news channels & YouTube etc .

[Crimson Dynamo]

You see the problem I have is ....

There never seems to be acknowledgement that garbage was ever written about Meghan,I'm as yet to get a response as to why the media thought it was ok to say Meghan is "straight outta Compton" ? . She isn't from Compton. And why was there all the tacky comparisons with Kate ? .

Or Piers Morgan's unhealthy obsession with Meghan,which is borderline creep fest , she's basically keeping him in a job .

But now I don't understand the end goal with Meghan & Harry's mission, the netflix fiasco sounds like a mess & Harry's book .....will just cause more upset with his family . So I just feel like it's gone so far now ,to the point where there's no hope or any clear conclusion. It seems more it's all about attention & money .

Meghan's family haven't helped matters ,her dad & sister have cashed in majorly . And now it's all tit for tat.

It's basically so out of control now ,that I don't see the light at the end of the tunnel for anyone involved.

People say they're fed up of them ,yet they keep giving them the limelight by talking about them on different news channels & YouTube etc .


"why the media thought it was ok to say Meghan is "straight outta Compton" ?"

the media didnt (there is no such thing as "the media" anyway)

One American journalist writing out of LA for the USA version of DailyMail.com wrote one article that had the headline " "Harry's girl is (almost) straight outta Compton: Gang-scarred home of her mother revealed – so will he be dropping by for tea?" and this was 6 years ago.

Markle grew up in Crenshaw LA and Compton is located 14 miles from Crenshaw

[GoldHeart]

The left wing will always support everything Meghan & Harry does, and the right wing will always be against everything they do.

It seems there's never a middle ground, I'm not on either side. But I don't see the point in the netflix & book ....other than just to make money , it's not exactly achieving anything else.

[Crimson Dynamo]

G9hYfHFBbIA

[Beso]

2nd most popular search on netflix behind meghan and harry..big boys dont cry.

A true story.. a story of angst, hurt distrust..and one worthy of sharing.

You wont here Paul Connelly giving it the poor me poor me ****e though.

[Beso]

The left wing will always support everything Meghan & Harry does, and the right wing will always be against everything they do.

It seems there's never a middle ground, I'm not on either side. But I don't see the point in the netflix & book ....other than just to make money , it's not exactly achieving anything else.

I would have gone along with that had I not woke up to the story about the left wing New Zealand prime minister demanding she be taken out of the docudrama.

[rusticgal]

Apparently Meghan has been nominated for an Oscar for her performance....:joker:

[GoldHeart]

I would have gone along with that had I not woke up to the story about the left wing New Zealand prime minister demanding she be taken out of the docudrama.

It's generally speaking .

Just like the right wing ... especially the heavy right wing ,will hate on Meghan for everything she says & does.

I personally can not be in either camp ,as I see major faults with both sides .

[arista]

Harry's new Book

Reduced more WHsmith

Now Reserve your copy for £14

[arista]

G9hYfHFBbIA


She will not enter the Police Station
to see him now