Northampton: Art teacher who let pupils as young as 15 pose Topless, Sacked

[arista]

[A Teacher sacked for letting her girl pupils
pose topless for a photography class
has defended the project as “art”.

Emma Wright, 41, was fired and
banned from teaching for two years
for allowing her students,
some as young as 15,
to take the lewd shots for a school project.]



She never asked the Parents
or other teachers,


A Professional Photographer
was brought in.



[The pictures showed teenage girls
posing only in their underwear,
while holding cigarettes and booze
containers, with their hands,
bottles or cans covering otherwise
naked breasts.

Mrs Wright has now complained
to Government officials and
vowed never to return to teaching again.

She told Sun Online exclusively:
“I feel there is a deep injustice about it,
but I am not going to appeal because
I no longer wish to teach.
“I have written to my MP, the union and
the Education Minister regarding this.
I am a good person.
I am not the person they
are making out to be.]



https://www.thesun.ie/news/8963672/sacked-art-teacher-injustice-pupils-pose-topless/

https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/NINTCHDBPICT000740767638.jpg?w=1240

[Alf]

Banned for two years? She should never be allowed to teach again.

She feels injustice? You wanna think yourself lucky love because if you were a man you'd probably be in prison.

[arista]

Banned for two years? She should never be allowed to teach again.

She feels injustice? You wanna think yourself lucky love because if you were a man you'd probably be in prison.


Bang On Right
Alf.

[Niamh.]

Banned for two years? She should never be allowed to teach again.

She feels injustice? You wanna think yourself lucky love because if you were a man you'd probably be in prison.Yeah, you're not wrong there, she should have been charged as well.and should never teach again

[thesheriff443]

The road to hell is paved with good intentions
Art is subjective

If you only see wrong then you don’t really know art

She should of got permission first.

[arista]

The road to hell is paved with good intentions
Art is subjective

If you only see wrong then you don’t really know art

She should of got permission first.


Yes she failed

[thesheriff443]

Yes she failed

We know that arista

[Zizu]

Banned for two years? She should never be allowed to teach again.

She feels injustice? You wanna think yourself lucky love because if you were a man you'd probably be in prison.


On the face of it she’s been very lucky .

The whole thing sounds incredible

She shouldn’t be allowed near children again though as her judgment is massively impaired.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

I don't mean to play the "if she was a man" card, she'd have gotten more than a couple of years ban.

[Crimson Dynamo]

She told Sun Online exclusively: “I feel there is a deep injustice about it, but I am not going to appeal because I no longer wish to teach."


--------

They also said the images included teens “posing with their hand inside their underwear or in a pose which simulated masturbation”.


:facepalm:

[bots]

she certainly shouldnt be near kids/ young adults