Prince Harry's shooting party pals told sexist and trans jokes

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/royal-family/2022/07/18/TELEMMGLPICT000302086199_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqp FlyLIwiB6NTmJwSX5rhseiWKOo9p9OQ-ymek.jpeg?imwidth=680

The Duchess of Sussex “reprimanded” Prince Harry’s friends over jokes about
transgender people and feminism in the early stages of their relationship,
according to a new biography.

“Their jokes, involving sexism, feminism and transgender people, ricocheted round the living rooms and dining rooms.

Bower claims: “Again and again she reprimanded them about the slightest
inappropriate nuance.

“Driving home after Sunday lunch, the texts pinged between the cars: “OMG
what about HER?” said one; “Harry must be f---ing nuts.”

Some friends said Meghan quibbled about the food and was “princessy”,
refusing to engage with Harry’s friends, it is alleged.

“She wasn’t interested in us,” one is quoted as saying.

A year later, for a second shoot at a hotel in Montreal, Meghan criticised the
hotel’s Tempurpedic bathrobe and slippers, it is claimed. She was also heard
complaining about “the production, the clothes, the style and the script”.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2022/07/18/prince-harrys-shooting-party-pals-told-sexist-trans-jokes-book/

[thesheriff443]

At this stage no one cares what has been said or not.

[Niamh.]

Are we surprised that a bunch of pompous rich assholes make jokes like that is the question......

[Jordan.]

Disgraceful. Thank god Meghan was there to shoot this vile behaviour down.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Looks like all the bullying allegations were true

i doubt anyone is surprised tbh

[GoldHeart]

Disgraceful. Thank god Meghan was there to shoot this vile behaviour down.

I was thinking this is something good about Meghan,but of course it still gets turned into another Meghan bashing article...typical really .

[Crimson Dynamo]

Book also said Queen was relieved Meghan did not attend Prince Philip 's funeral

Also claimed Meghan phoned PR firm in 'hysterics' after palace interview fury

[Crimson Dynamo]

Bower says the Duke of Sussex was 'looking forward' to 'endless banter' with his friends -
but Meghan, 40, was less than impressed and 'challenged every guest' who 'contravened
her woke values'.

Meghan 'lacked any sense of humour' and was a 'dampener on the party', Bower says in
his new book, according to The Times newspaper.

[Crimson Dynamo]

FROM THE MAIL ARTICLE:

TOP COMMENT: First step of an abuser is to isolate their partner from friends family

[GoldHeart]

FROM THE MAIL ARTICLE:

TOP COMMENT: First step of an abuser is to isolate their partner from friends family

Amazing how Meghan is still painted as the ' abuser ' , she's literally standing up against prejudice yet she's the bad person ..hmm ok . And I suppose if she laughed along with the sexist jokes etc ,she'd still be a 'bad person ' ? shock horror a NO win situation :idc:.

[Crimson Dynamo]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="qst" dir="ltr">Why? <a href="https://t.co/oEITbGEXON">https://t.co/oEITbGEXON</a></p>&mdash; Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1548981886441119746?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[Liam-]

Princess Meghan remains schooling the bigots

[Liam-]

They sound like the type of people who’d have probably taken shots at black people too if she weren’t in their presence tbh

[GoldHeart]

They sound like the type of people who’d have probably taken shots at black people too if she weren’t in their presence tbh

Probably

[Jordan.]

They sound like the type of people who’d have probably taken shots at black people too if she weren’t in their presence tbh

Yep, sad this is the company Harry used to keep. Even sadder some are more offended at Meghan for not finding it amusing.

[GoldHeart]

Yep, sad this is the company Harry used to keep. Even sadder some are more offended at Meghan for not finding it amusing.

Even if Meghan found their jokes "amusing" , she'd still be slated .

[Crimson Dynamo]

Meghan 'lacked any sense of humour'

what a total buzzkill

[arista]

Are we surprised that a bunch of pompous rich assholes make jokes like that is the question......


No we are not



His Wife will have to Whip him
now

[Niamh.]

No we are not



His Wife will have to Whip him
now

No harm by the sounds of the company he kept!

[Beso]

Yep, sad this is the company Harry used to keep. Even sadder some are more offended at Meghan for not finding it amusing.

Shes married a bigot.

[Liam-]

Yep, sad this is the company Harry used to keep. Even sadder some are more offended at Meghan for not finding it amusing.

She really has changed him as a person for the better, Queen ****

[bots]

a bunch of public school hooray henry's... genuine scum

[Crimson Dynamo]

a bunch of public school hooray henry's... genuine scum

lets not drag the Cabinet into this

[AnnieK]

Its actually fairly funny that people are trying to use meghan being offended by sexism, racism and whatever else as a stick to beat her :laugh:

There is a lot coming out at the moment in this book that is less than complimentary about Meghan....but trying to ridicule her for calling out bigotry is hilarious

[Crimson Dynamo]

Its actually fairly funny that people are trying to use meghan being offended by sexism, racism and whatever else as a stick to beat her :laugh:

There is a lot coming out at the moment in this book that is less than complimentary about Meghan....but trying to ridicule her for calling out bigotry is hilarious

yes if the "jokes" were

sounds to me like normal British banter that She took umbridge to everyone as she has a stick so firmly up her arse that every pal there thought she was a total nightmare

vile woman

no wonder his pals were like "f me Harry are you mad??"

[AnnieK]

yes if the "jokes" were

sounds to me like normal British banter that She took umbridge to everyone as she has a stick so firmly up her arse that every pal there thought she was a total nightmare

vile woman

no wonder his pals were like "f me Harry are you mad??"

Typical British banter?
Do you and your friends make sexist, racist and.anti trans jokes? None of my friends do....don't think its "typical"
If my mates were making inappropriate jokes, id call them out, as I hope they would me. Does that make me vile? I actually don't care if it does :laugh:

[GoldHeart]

Typical British banter?
Do you and your friends make sexist, racist and.anti trans jokes? None of my friends do....don't think its "typical"
If my mates were making inappropriate jokes, id call them out, as I hope they would me. Does that make me vile? I actually don't care if it does :laugh:

Don't forget it's Meghan calling them out therefore she's a witch with no sense of humour , if Kate called them out then she'd be a saviour as she's Mary Poppins .

[AnnieK]

Don't forget it's Meghan calling them out therefore she's a witch with no sense of humour , if Kate called them out then she'd be a saviour as she's Mary Poppins .

I actually don't expect an answer as I hope there really isn't a defense of offensive humour....but then conversely fully expect some anti-Meghan vitriol over this :laugh:

[jet]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/meghan-harry-wont-silence-me-27501192

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'won't silence me', says author of new bombshell book

Biographer Tom Bower spent a year collecting exclusive interviews with Meghan's friends and enemies before writing his tell-all biography which is set for release next week.
Prince Harry and Meghan were told 'don't expect to silence me' by the author of a new 'explosive' biography on the couple.
Investigative journalist and author Tom Bower is "pulling no punches" in his new book 'Revenge' which promises to reveal all the Sussexes' secrets, royal experts say.
Bower spent 12 months gathering evidence and exclusive interviews with both friends and enemies of Meghan Markle ahead of his release next Thursday (July 21).
But the couple are said to be "dreading" its publication after the author reportedly warned Meghan he wouldn't be silenced on the most controversial details….

Extracts have been serialised in the Times this past weekend....and WOW, she is even worse than many already believed.
You know those 'Dummy' books, like 'Computers for Dummies' or 'French for Dummies'...well, Bower's book is being hailed as 'Meghan Markle for Dummies'. :hehe:

[jet]

https://www.waterstones.com/book/revenge/tom-bower/9781788705035

The provocative biographer of Boris Johnson, Prince Charles and Tony Blair delivers a characteristically explosive and rigorously researched account of the rift between the Sussexes and the rest of the Royal Family, touching on every aspect of scandal and suspicion.

Tom Bower, Britain’s leading investigative biographer, unpicks the tangled web surrounding the Sussexes and their relationship with the royal family.

From the courtroom dramas to courtier politics, using extensive research, expert sourcing and interviews from insiders who have never spoken before, this book will uncover an astonishing story of love, betrayal, secrets and revenge....

My copy is ordered from Amazon. It's selling like hotcakes.

[AnnieK]

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/meghan-harry-wont-silence-me-27501192

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry 'won't silence me', says author of new bombshell book

Biographer Tom Bower spent a year collecting exclusive interviews with Meghan's friends and enemies before writing his tell-all biography which is set for release next week.
Prince Harry and Meghan were told 'don't expect to silence me' by the author of a new 'explosive' biography on the couple.
Investigative journalist and author Tom Bower is "pulling no punches" in his new book 'Revenge' which promises to reveal all the Sussexes' secrets, royal experts say.
Bower spent 12 months gathering evidence and exclusive interviews with both friends and enemies of Meghan Markle ahead of his release next Thursday (July 21).
But the couple are said to be "dreading" its publication after the author reportedly warned Meghan he wouldn't be silenced on the most controversial details….

Extracts have been serialised in the Times this past weekend....and WOW, she is even worse than many already believed.
You know those 'Dummy' books, like 'Computers for Dummies' or 'French for Dummies'...well, Bower's book is being hailed as 'Meghan Markle for Dummies'. :hehe:

Its actually pathetic....all this book will do is drive a bigger wedge and make Harry's book more sensational when it comes out. These "unofficial" books only stoke the flames and make a mockery of the monarchy. They all need to pipe down now and just get on with their lives

[Liam-]

Sounds like Harry’s previous friends didn’t like a woman having an opinion on things, glad they both escaped that bigoted atmosphere

[Crimson Dynamo]

Typical British banter?
Do you and your friends make sexist, racist and.anti trans jokes? None of my friends do....don't think its "typical"
If my mates were making inappropriate jokes, id call them out, as I hope they would me. Does that make me vile? I actually don't care if it does :laugh:

you are assuming the "jokes" were

I am assuming they were not

markle is a woke warrior who sees race in everything]

nasty

[AnnieK]

you are assuming the "jokes" were

I am assuming they were not

markle is a woke warrior who sees race in everything]

nasty

Did you actually read the article you posted?


Their jokes, involving sexism, feminism and transgender people, ricocheted round the living rooms and dining rooms.

I can't see the "not" in that

NASTY

[Crimson Dynamo]

Did you actually read the article you posted?


Their jokes, involving sexism, feminism and transgender people, ricocheted round the living rooms and dining rooms.

NASTY

yes and what factual data are you basing it on?

wait

one person's interpretation

do you think a single person who was there would agree?

I DONT

[AnnieK]

yes and what factual data are you basing it on?

wait

one person's interpretation

do you think a single person who was there would agree?

I DONT

So what factual data are you basing it on? :laugh:
LT, you really are clutching.

Just stop, it's embarrassing for you now. :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

So what factual data are you basing it on? :laugh:
LT, you really are clutching.

Just stop, it's embarrassing for you now. :joker:

what is embarrassing is your initial point that you seem unable to defend

hence why you cant answer the question

remember i posted the info

what data are you using to back up?

oh wait, what i posted

:facepalm:

[Jordan.]

Typical British banter?
Do you and your friends make sexist, racist and.anti trans jokes? None of my friends do....don't think its "typical"
If my mates were making inappropriate jokes, id call them out, as I hope they would me. Does that make me vile? I actually don't care if it does :laugh:

Well he does quite regularly on tibb, I doubt he's so brazen in real life.

[AnnieK]

what is embarrassing is your initial point that you seem unable to defend

hence why you cant answer the question

remember i posted the info

what data are you using to back up?

oh wait, what i posted

:facepalm:
What the **** are you on about?
You posted an article stating that Meghan called people out for making sexist, anti feminist and anti trans jokes. You said she was a "buzz kill" You then said it was typical British banter, I called that out. Do you think that's typical? Do you think Meghan was wrong for calling out that "humour" if it happened.

Carry on through thinking its typical British humour to find sexist, anti feminist and anti trans humour hilarious and anyone who calls that "humour" out is a massive buzzkill and a bully
All evident in your posts and all very illuminating to be honest

What is hilarious is there is far more dodgy stuff coming out about Meghan from the stuff in his book but you are fixating on her being offended by comments that I would.hope the majority of GBP would also find offensive

[Crimson Dynamo]

What the **** are you on about?
You posted an article stating that Meghan called people out for making sexist, anti feminist and anti trans jokes. You said she was a "buzz kill" You then said it was typical British banter, I called that out. Do you think that's typical? Do you think Meghan was wrong for calling out that "humour" if it happened.

Carry on through thinking its typical British humour to find sexist, anti feminist and anti trans humour hilarious and anyone who calls that "humour" out is a massive buzzkill and a bully
All evident in your posts and all very illuminating to be honest

What is hilarious is there is far more dodgy stuff coming out about Meghan from the stuff in his book but you are fixating on her being offended by comments that I would.hope the majority of GBP would also find offensive

do you realise that its one persons opinion?

of what was said?

[AnnieK]

do you realise that its one persons opinion?

of what was said?
Do you?

Considering you posted the article and thread??

[AnnieK]

Do you?

Considering you posted the article and thread??

Come on LT....have some conviction in your posts. In all your replies to me all you have done is try to deflect my responses. Have some balls now. If, as you say, the whole article is based on one persons opinion, why post it as fact and that bullying allegations were true and Meghan is a vile, woke person?

I'm not a kid...and will play deflect tennis for days with you if you want....ask me for factual data, i'll send that right back, its all heresay but don't try to make me look like a dick when you post tabloid gossip :laugh:

[jet]

These Hurrah Henry's were Harry's close friends, which says a lot....what made Meghan fall in love with him so quickly when he was 'one of them,'with the same 'banter'? Perhaps because he was a loaded Royal Prince it was different....
She had been angling to meet him for months after all.

[AnnieK]

These Hurrah Henry's were Harry's close friends, which says a lot....what made Meghan fall in love with him so quickly when he was 'one of them,'with the same 'banter'? Perhaps because he was a loaded Royal Prince it was different....
She had been angling to meet him for months after all.

Harry's mates says a lot about the Royal circle as a whole. Are William's mates as bigoted? Is that what we want going forward as a Monarchy? Entitled people making fun of minorities? Hopefully William's circle is not so bigotted???

[Crimson Dynamo]

Spot on as ever Jet

Spoken from a position of information as per

[AnnieK]

Spot on as ever Jet

Spoken from a position of information as per

What position of information?

You ignoring my questions to you? Shocking

[rusticgal]

Harry's mates says a lot about the Royal circle as a whole. Are William's mates as bigoted? Is that what we want going forward as a Monarchy? Entitled people making fun of minorities? Hopefully William's circle is not so bigotted???

Not really…Harry’s mates say a lot about him. Simple.

[jet]

Harry's mates says a lot about the Royal circle as a whole. Are William's mates as bigoted? Is that what we want going forward as a Monarchy? Entitled people making fun of minorities? Hopefully William's circle is not so bigotted???

Does it? What makes you think so?
I don’t recall any other Royals falling out of pubs blitzed out of their heads, taking drugs, or having naked pool parties.
I don’t recall any of the Royals dressing up as Nazis, calling people of colour ‘P**** in the army or slinging anti - semetic abuse at another army guy who annoyed him.
Meghan didn’t marry William, she married Harry, so I don’t know why William is even being mentioned.

[Beso]

She married a racist bigot, to suit her yearning amd longing to be impulses.

Shes a moron that is digging her own grave.

[jet]

Extract from Tom Bower book.
The Sunday Times

.....On March 13, 2016, Meghan flew into Montreal for her second Reitmans shoot. As she entered the location — an old restaurant — for the day’s filming, the tension was uncomfortable.
Jeannie Vondjidis-Miller described Meghan as the “National Spokesperson” for Reitmans. “We wanted someone with a point of view,” she said. Very soon, many of the creative team associated with the campaign were exhausted by Meghan’s point of view.

The 35-second commercial was called “The Label”. Meghan, the creative directors employed by the Tank agency and John Grammatico, the film director, disagreed about the “concept” that ended with Meghan delivering the tag-line “Reitmans... Really”.
“Seriously, this doesn’t make sense!” Meghan exclaimed about the storyboard. “I’m a brash American and if my name is going to be on something, I’m going to have my say.”
Tank’s account manager, Emmanuelle Thaon, and creative director Sophie Gaudet were reluctant to make changes. In their opinion, Meghan offered no worthwhile alternative ideas, other than suggesting that a Caribbean location with a Hollywood budget would be better.

On March 14 the arguments reached their climax. After ferocious exchanges a few script changes were made, only to be rejected by Meghan again. “She bulldozed her way through,” complained one of the team. No one stood up to her.
One year after the first campaign, Meghan was less enamoured that her “brand” was attached to Reitmans. Not only was she associated with a downmarket label, but their new clothes were decidedly unappealing.
In addition, her sense of entitlement had grown.

Unhappy that her executive suite for C$1,531 per night at the Place d’Armes hotel in Montreal was only a master bedroom, living-room and powder-room, Meghan demanded that the agency reserve a bigger suite at the more expensive Gault hotel. “She insists,” said her agent. The production team resisted. “She wants photographs of the hotel rooms and the rooms assigned to her on the set,” said her agent.

Next, Meghan demanded that she be registered in the hotel under an alias, Jane Smith. “Her identity must be kept secret,” said her agent, Lori Sale. “Meghan doesn’t want to be hassled by the hotel staff, other guests or photographers.” The production team were flummoxed. No one in French-speaking Montreal really knew Meghan. In the event, the hotel refused the request. No paparazzi gathered outside the hotel.
Inside the hotel room, ignoring the flower displays, bottles of her favourite wine and even a special calligraphy pen carefully laid out on the tables, she criticised the hotel’s Tempurpedic bathrobe and slippers. She wanted Dior. The tea was the wrong blend and the vegan green juice was warm.

“The Princess is coming,” sniggered one assistant as, hard-faced, Meghan arrived on set, avoiding eye contact with the crew. She disappeared upstairs to her dressing-room.
Throughout the day Meghan appeared for her shots escorted by her entourage — Felix the hairdresser and Marco the make-up artist — and then returned to her room. Both were ordered never to leave her side. “She was always fed up,” one crew member noted, “sighing, huffing and rolling her eyes at things. It was heavy-going working with her.” Another claimed that she would be “super sweet” with Felix and Marco and then within seconds turn to the crew and be “super-disagreeable”.

No one dared to contradict Meghan. Keeping their jobs depended on satisfying her demands. The only consolation was Meghan’s actual performance. In front of the lens she transformed herself into a warm, glamorous icon.

The following day, the mood deteriorated. To satisfy another of Meghan’s demands, the wardrobe staff had bought a pair of expensive Aquazzura beige suede shoes chosen by her. From her dressing-room, Meghan was heard complaining about the production, the clothes, the style and the script. In retaliation, members of the team began to speak in French.
During the filming, Meghan was asked: “What Canadian woman inspires you?” She laughed and asked for examples. “None of them inspires me,” she replied. “You can’t make me say something I don’t want to or don’t believe in.”

“It’s a wrap,” shouted the assistant at exactly 7pm. Meghan’s agent had already called to warn that her client would not film one extra minute. There was none of the customary “Thank you” or “See you again”. Meghan departed. To the surprise of the wardrobe staff she forgot to leave behind the Aquazzura shoes.

“She is definitely the meanest person I’ve ever met. Just saying,” Jean Malek, the third director, posted on Facebook.
----------------------------

Tom Bower, 2022. Extracted from Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors by Tom Bower, to be published by Blink Publishing, on July 21 at £22

[Jordan.]

Where will this fan fiction be published, tumblr?

[thesheriff443]

Where will this fan fiction be published, tumblr?

It will be sold in same shops that sold Meghan’s book only in the adult section.

[jet]

Where will this fan fiction be published, tumblr?

Tom Bower has written warts-and-all biographies about three Prime Ministers, one Leader of the Opposition and Prince Charles, among others.
He says he asks himself: “Do I have proof and would it stand up in court if I was sued?, if it’s a yes I go ahead”.

He has never been successfully sued for anything he has written. His lawyers have gone over the book with a fine tooth comb. IF he has got something wrong, and Meghan can prove it, I’m sure we will find out in the fullness of time.

Silly denials from Sussex fans mean diddly squat at this stage.
As a fan, why not read the book and post any positives instead of burying your head in the sand?

[AnnieK]

Tom Bowers book on Charles was similarly brutal by all accounts and reviews. He has never met Charles but managed to get 120 sources close to the monarchy to spill secrets about him, Camilla, his relationship with the family and between his team and Buckingham Palace. Its all pretty sensational and distasteful but sure those who don't like Charles lapped it up, as those who don't like Harry and Meghan will with this one.

[thesheriff443]

Tom Bowers book on Charles was similarly brutal by all accounts and reviews. He has never met Charles but managed to get 120 sources close to the monarchy to spill secrets about him, Camilla, his relationship with the family and between his team and Buckingham Palace. Its all pretty sensational and distasteful but sure those who don't like Charles lapped it up, as those who don't like Harry and Meghan will with this one.

I wouldn’t buy the book regardless of my opinion on Meghan and I think that’s true for all those who post on here

Jet’s maybe the only exception and that’s not him lapping it up it’s because he has a genuine interest in the royals.

[AnnieK]

I wouldn’t buy the book regardless of my opinion on Meghan and I think that’s true for all those who post on here

Jet maybe the only exception and that’s not him lapping it up but he has a genuine interest in the royals.

I wasn't talking about people on here....more the actual book buying public.

Charles has his fair share of detractors and the only reason to buy a Tom Bower book really is to read into the sordid, nasty stuff he uncovers.

I doubt Jet would buy it (might be wrong) as its not a factual book, no matter how the author tries to spin it, its all based on hearsay

[thesheriff443]

I wasn't talking about people on here....more the actual book buying public.

Charles has his fair share of detractors and the only reason to buy a Tom Bower book really is to read into the sordid, nasty stuff he uncovers.

I doubt Jet would buy it (might be wrong) as its not a factual book, no matter how the author tries to spin it, its all based on hearsay

If the nasty stuff can be proven to be false he would get sued
We know for sure Meghan and harry will sue if they don’t agree with what’s been written about them so we will see.

The bullying allegations don’t paint Meghan as a nice person but has she sued?, no

[bots]

i shall have to rush out and buy it :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

i shall have to rush out and buy it :laugh:

You must have a wonky table leg.

[Beso]

She sounds delightful!!

[jet]

Tom Bowers book on Charles was similarly brutal by all accounts and reviews. He has never met Charles but managed to get 120 sources close to the monarchy to spill secrets about him, Camilla, his relationship with the family and between his team and Buckingham Palace. Its all pretty sensational and distasteful but sure those who don't like Charles lapped it up, as those who don't like Harry and Meghan will with this one.

I’ve read his book on Charles. It’s a fascinating and absorbing read. I’m an avid reader and have read dozens of acclaimed Royal bio’s, whether I like them or not. I like the person behind the facade to be revealed as much as possible, not the likes of honey coated, gushing tales like Omid Scobies ‘Finding Freedom’. If people regard the findings of an author ‘sensational and distasteful’, rather than ‘here they are, warts and all’ then when it comes to the Sussexes, Finding Freedom would be a better fit. :shrug:

[rusticgal]

Its all pretty sensational and distasteful but sure those who don't like Charles lapped it up, as those who don't like Harry and Meghan will with this one.


Should be a Best seller then :laugh:

[rusticgal]

Extract from Tom Bower book.
The Sunday Times

.....On March 13, 2016, Meghan flew into Montreal for her second Reitmans shoot. As she entered the location — an old restaurant — for the day’s filming, the tension was uncomfortable.
Jeannie Vondjidis-Miller described Meghan as the “National Spokesperson” for Reitmans. “We wanted someone with a point of view,” she said. Very soon, many of the creative team associated with the campaign were exhausted by Meghan’s point of view.

The 35-second commercial was called “The Label”. Meghan, the creative directors employed by the Tank agency and John Grammatico, the film director, disagreed about the “concept” that ended with Meghan delivering the tag-line “Reitmans... Really”.
“Seriously, this doesn’t make sense!” Meghan exclaimed about the storyboard. “I’m a brash American and if my name is going to be on something, I’m going to have my say.”
Tank’s account manager, Emmanuelle Thaon, and creative director Sophie Gaudet were reluctant to make changes. In their opinion, Meghan offered no worthwhile alternative ideas, other than suggesting that a Caribbean location with a Hollywood budget would be better.

On March 14 the arguments reached their climax. After ferocious exchanges a few script changes were made, only to be rejected by Meghan again. “She bulldozed her way through,” complained one of the team. No one stood up to her.
One year after the first campaign, Meghan was less enamoured that her “brand” was attached to Reitmans. Not only was she associated with a downmarket label, but their new clothes were decidedly unappealing.
In addition, her sense of entitlement had grown.

Unhappy that her executive suite for C$1,531 per night at the Place d’Armes hotel in Montreal was only a master bedroom, living-room and powder-room, Meghan demanded that the agency reserve a bigger suite at the more expensive Gault hotel. “She insists,” said her agent. The production team resisted. “She wants photographs of the hotel rooms and the rooms assigned to her on the set,” said her agent.

Next, Meghan demanded that she be registered in the hotel under an alias, Jane Smith. “Her identity must be kept secret,” said her agent, Lori Sale. “Meghan doesn’t want to be hassled by the hotel staff, other guests or photographers.” The production team were flummoxed. No one in French-speaking Montreal really knew Meghan. In the event, the hotel refused the request. No paparazzi gathered outside the hotel.
Inside the hotel room, ignoring the flower displays, bottles of her favourite wine and even a special calligraphy pen carefully laid out on the tables, she criticised the hotel’s Tempurpedic bathrobe and slippers. She wanted Dior. The tea was the wrong blend and the vegan green juice was warm.

“The Princess is coming,” sniggered one assistant as, hard-faced, Meghan arrived on set, avoiding eye contact with the crew. She disappeared upstairs to her dressing-room.
Throughout the day Meghan appeared for her shots escorted by her entourage — Felix the hairdresser and Marco the make-up artist — and then returned to her room. Both were ordered never to leave her side. “She was always fed up,” one crew member noted, “sighing, huffing and rolling her eyes at things. It was heavy-going working with her.” Another claimed that she would be “super sweet” with Felix and Marco and then within seconds turn to the crew and be “super-disagreeable”.

No one dared to contradict Meghan. Keeping their jobs depended on satisfying her demands. The only consolation was Meghan’s actual performance. In front of the lens she transformed herself into a warm, glamorous icon.

The following day, the mood deteriorated. To satisfy another of Meghan’s demands, the wardrobe staff had bought a pair of expensive Aquazzura beige suede shoes chosen by her. From her dressing-room, Meghan was heard complaining about the production, the clothes, the style and the script. In retaliation, members of the team began to speak in French.
During the filming, Meghan was asked: “What Canadian woman inspires you?” She laughed and asked for examples. “None of them inspires me,” she replied. “You can’t make me say something I don’t want to or don’t believe in.”

“It’s a wrap,” shouted the assistant at exactly 7pm. Meghan’s agent had already called to warn that her client would not film one extra minute. There was none of the customary “Thank you” or “See you again”. Meghan departed. To the surprise of the wardrobe staff she forgot to leave behind the Aquazzura shoes.

“She is definitely the meanest person I’ve ever met. Just saying,” Jean Malek, the third director, posted on Facebook.
----------------------------

Tom Bower, 2022. Extracted from Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors by Tom Bower, to be published by Blink Publishing, on July 21 at £22


...what Megan wants Meghan gets....poor Harry!!

[jet]

Should be a Best seller then :laugh:

:joker:

[Oliver_W]

I actually don't expect an answer as I hope there really isn't a defense of offensive humour....

All humour -and all speech- is defendable, regardless of how "offensive" it is.

[Beso]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="qst" dir="ltr">Why? <a href="https://t.co/oEITbGEXON">https://t.co/oEITbGEXON</a></p>&mdash; Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1548981886441119746?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 18, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



I wonder if he fulfilled his pre nuptial agreement in having to mention how wonderfull meghan is in every ****ing speech he gives.

[Beso]

Oh, I see he did. She must have wrote the little puppets speech for him.

I bet the low turnout was enthralled!!

[Beso]

61QmAIE_ang

[rusticgal]

Oh, I see he did. She must have wrote the little puppets speech for him.

I bet the low turnout was enthralled!!


There was barely anyone there….:laugh:

[jet]

I bet they expected a full house to see and hear them - the very important Duke and Duchess of Sussex. How embarrassing. :blush:

[jet]

A recap of a little of Meghan’s Vanity Fair Project from Tom Bower’s book:

Meghan was asked by Harry not to mention him at all in the Vanity Fair interview, but told the interviewer “We are a couple” “We are in love”.

She said she wanted to be portrayed as the serious actress, activist and philanthrophist that she was, but the researchers could find no proof of any activism or philantrophy.
One example - they said Meghan told them about a personal success she had achieved in writing a letter to Proctor and Gamble to persuade them to change one of their adverts - and she received a praising letter from Hilary Clinton about it. Turns out it was a school project and they had received thousands of similar requests over time which prompted the eventual change….and she was unable to produce any evidence of a letter from HC.

WTF is wrong with her? Does she make things up in her head and then believe them to be actually true? Does she expect people to automatically not question the wonderful persona and actions that she has invented for herself? Crazy stuff. :umm2:

[Beso]

Body language tells you everything.

2ajsC7CJZgo

[Beso]

Forever the opportunist..

Smile for the camera...


https://www.google.com/search?q=meghan+markle&client=ms-android-samsung&tbm=isch&prmd=niv&sxsrf=ALiCzsZoy48LgnVSweRXMCYVN0CqoJVTOQ:165826514 8555&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj5zP2I74X5AhUSiFwKHbKKA6wQ_AUIFygC&biw=360&bih=612&dpr=3#imgrc=Kj3beXBkchvyOM

[rusticgal]

Body language tells you everything.

2ajsC7CJZgo


I wouldn’t have wanted it back :joker:

[thesheriff443]

In the new book it will say quick thinking Meghan with no regards for her own safety saved a woman’s life.

[Oliver_W]

She said she wanted to be portrayed as the serious actress, activist and philanthrophist that she was, but the researchers could find no proof of any activism or philantrophy.


I'm not convinced there's evidence of her being a serious actress either :hehe:

[jet]

I'm not convinced there's evidence of her being a serious actress either :hehe:

:laugh: Very true.

[Jordan.]

2ajsC7CJZgo

Aw what a lovely gesture. Compassion in action :love:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Body language tells you everything.

2ajsC7CJZgo

God, Harry looks so depressed and downtrodden

who is caring for his mental health?

[rusticgal]

God, Harry looks so depressed and downtrodden

who is caring for his mental health?


You are right...he does.

[Zizu]

God, Harry looks so depressed and downtrodden

who is caring for his mental health?


I still really like Harry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Cherie]

Body language tells you everything.

2ajsC7CJZgo

why does she keep rubbing Harrys arm like he is a child needing reasurrance,

[thesheriff443]

why does she keep rubbing Harrys arm like he is a child needing reasurrance,

He is playing with his wedding ring again.

He looks anxious.

[The Slim Reaper]

Good to see tibbs team of MH experts in clinic again.

[thesheriff443]

Good to see tibbs team of MH experts in clinic again.

No one is claiming to be experts but does he look happy? Confident?

[The Slim Reaper]

No one is claiming to be experts but does he look happy? Confident?

Probably need to see him in his home environment to make an honest reading on it, same with any person with that profile. Faking happiness is likely to be more of an issue, as we see with the revolving door of celebs into therapy.

Without knowing them or using mail articles to pretend I do, I'd feel more comfortable with anyone who shone on the outside what was reflected on the inside, whether they're having a bad week or a good week. But even more importantly than that, I have no idea why you're so invested. :shrug:

[thesheriff443]

Probably need to see him in his home environment to make an honest reading on it, same with any person with that profile. Faking happiness is likely to be more of an issue, as we see with the revolving door of celebs into therapy.

Without knowing them or using mail articles to pretend I do, I'd feel more comfortable with anyone who shone on the outside what was reflected on the inside, whether they're having a bad week or a good week. But even more importantly than that, I have no idea why you're so invested. :shrug:

One I’m not invested, it’s a thread on a forum
Two, you have seen harry for years at big occasions so it’s not like you have no comparison.

[The Slim Reaper]

One I’m not invested, it’s a thread on a forum
Two, you have seen harry for years at big occasions so it’s not like you have no comparison.

Some days folks can be happy, others not so much. Some years folks can be happy, others not so much. If I was suffering, then maybe a nice comforting rub from the ol' ball and chain might make me feel better. I have no idea, but neither does anyone else.

I'm quite a touchy feely person in relationships, so maybe if I married a princess, you and the mail would be asking why I felt the need to hold her hand, or placed it on the small of her back. Who knows?

[bots]

harry has never been comfortable doing events like that so i'm not surprised

[thesheriff443]

Some days folks can be happy, others not so much. Some years folks can be happy, others not so much. If I was suffering, then maybe a nice comforting rub from the ol' ball and chain might make me feel better. I have no idea, but neither does anyone else.

I'm quite a touchy feely person in relationships, so maybe if I married a princess, you and the mail would be asking why I felt the need to hold her hand, or placed it on the small of her back. Who knows?

If Thomas dressed as a princess that’s your only hope of marrying one.

[The Slim Reaper]

If Thomas dressed as a princess that’s your only hope of marrying one.

I'll take princess thomas and leave the auto trader girls to you :smug:

[Oliver_W]

Yeah I'm not really interested in his body language when a camera is pointing at him, it's reaching a bit. It's like when people made videos dissecting the way Brie Lawson and people around her were acting during insipid interviews about throwaway movies :joker:

[thesheriff443]

I'll take princess thomas and leave the auto trader girls to you :smug:

One of us is in a relationship and it’s not you.
Maybe lay off on the touchy-feely

[The Slim Reaper]

One of us is in a relationship and it’s not you.
Maybe lay off on the touchy-feely

I hope at least this one knows she is in a relationship with you. Unlike the last few. Enjoy the sunshine :hee:

[thesheriff443]

I hope at least this one knows she is in a relationship with you. Unlike the last few. Enjoy the sunshine :hee:

What are you talking about?
I’ve been with my partner for 7 years.

[Beso]

God, Harry looks so depressed and downtrodden

who is caring for his mental health?

The bloke on his left hand side, edging away like theres no tomorrow.

[Beso]

why does she keep rubbing Harrys arm like he is a child needing reasurrance,

Cause the black people to his left and her right want **** all to do with them..parson my Spanish.

[Glenn.]

why does she keep rubbing Harrys arm like he is a child needing reasurrance,

Is it not normal for someone in a loving relationship to rub their better half’s arm then? I find that a very strange thing to pick at.

I’m always rubbing my boyfriends arm and he’s always rubbing mine? It’s nice. Maybe you need to be in a more loving relationship to understand.

[thesheriff443]

Is it not normal for someone in a loving relationship to rub their better half’s arm then? I find that a very strange thing to pick at.

I’m always rubbing my boyfriends arm and he’s always rubbing mine? It’s nice. Maybe you need to be in a more loving relationship to understand.

Pair of rubbers

[thesheriff443]

Don’t worry harry mummy will rub it better.

The explanations some members are coming up with.

People in Normal adult relationship don’t feel the need to hold onto or touch one another especially in public.

Who looked in control in that clip because it sure wasn’t harry.

Like the time she wiped the lipstick of his face making him appear child like and help less.

[bots]

the folks sitting either side of them are thinking, i'm going to be on the telly, how do i get out of shot

[The Slim Reaper]

Don’t worry harry mummy will rub it better.

The explanations some members are coming up with.

People in Normal adult relationship don’t feel the need to hold onto or touch one another especially in public.

Who looked in control in that clip because it sure wasn’t harry.

Like the time she wiped the lipstick of his face making him appear child like and help less.

Definitely not invested though :smug:

People in normal adult relationships can do whatever they like as long as it's consensual. Maybe real partners act differently to imaginary ones? :shrug:

[Liam-]

First touching her baby bump and now this? Rubbing her husbands arm? Honestly just chop her hands off! :fist:

[Swan]

It really is kinda ironic that he flew in his private jet to give a speech on our carbon footprints.

His preaching and level of self importance is pretty boring.

[Beso]

the folks sitting either side of them are thinking, i'm going to be on the telly, how do i get out of shot

::dance:

[thesheriff443]

Definitely not invested though :smug:

People in normal adult relationships can do whatever they like as long as it's consensual. Maybe real partners act differently to imaginary ones? :shrug:

Well when your make believe one gets home ask.
Are actually suggesting I don’t have a partner ?

[thesheriff443]

Again slim, it’s a thread on a forum , look at your new account post count, it’s clear you post on here more than me.
But keep trying to get a bite.

[jet]

Definitely not invested though :smug:

People in normal adult relationships can do whatever they like as long as it's consensual. Maybe real partners act differently to imaginary ones? :shrug:


https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-awkward-hand-holding-video-un-viral-twitter-1725929

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's Awkward Hand-Holding Video at U.N. Goes Viral

Scroll down to ‘Something is very wrong here’ video. There is nothing consensual about this.
Meghan takes Harry’s hand and he pulls it away, she takes it again and he pulls away again.
She then takes it AGAIN and this time holds onto it by holding his arm down.
He is pointedly avoiding looking at her. He looks bloody pissed off and miserable.

[The Slim Reaper]

https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-awkward-hand-holding-video-un-viral-twitter-1725929

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's Awkward Hand-Holding Video at U.N. Goes Viral

Scroll down to ‘Something is very wrong here’ video. There is nothing consensual about this.
Meghan takes Harry’s hand and he pulls it away, she takes it again and he pulls away again.
She then takes it AGAIN and this time holds onto it by holding his arm down.
He is pointedly avoiding looking at her. He looks bloody pissed off and miserable.

Probably need to see him in his home environment to make an honest reading on it, same with any person with that profile. Faking happiness is likely to be more of an issue, as we see with the revolving door of celebs into therapy.

Without knowing them or using mail articles to pretend I do, I'd feel more comfortable with anyone who shone on the outside what was reflected on the inside, whether they're having a bad week or a good week. But even more importantly than that, I have no idea why you're so invested. :shrug:

.

[jet]

When Harry was with the Royal family, he was seen as the ‘cheeky chappy’ because he was always laughing and larking about. He looked happy, he had a ‘spark’, no matter what he said about wanting out.

Well, he got out. He lives in sunny LA in a fabulous mansion and has two lovely kids of his own, something he always wanted. But it’s rare to see him with a smile on his face, he more often than not looks like a miserable git and when he talks it’s all doom and gloom. His light has gone out. Anyone can see that, no matter how they try to deny it. I almost feel sorry for him….almost…

[Crimson Dynamo]

When Harry was with the Royal family, he was seen as the ‘cheeky chappy’ because he was always laughing and larking about. He looked happy, he had a ‘spark’, no matter what he said about wanting out.

Well, he got out. He lives in sunny LA in a fabulous mansion and has two lovely kids of his own, something he always wanted. But it’s rare to see him with a smile on his face, he more often than not looks like a miserable git and when he talks it’s all doom and gloom. His light has gone out. Anyone can see that, no matter how they try to deny it. I almost feel sorry for him….almost…

spot on Jet

his eyes are dead

his life-force sucked out and absorbed

[Beso]

When Harry was with the Royal family, he was seen as the ‘cheeky chappy’ because he was always laughing and larking about. He looked happy, he had a ‘spark’, no matter what he said about wanting out.

Well, he got out. He lives in sunny LA in a fabulous mansion and has two lovely kids of his own, something he always wanted. But it’s rare to see him with a smile on his face, he more often than not looks like a miserable git and when he talks it’s all doom and gloom. His light has gone out. Anyone can see that, no matter how they try to deny it. I almost feel sorry for him….almost…


People will still try and disagree with that....for trolling purposes.:joker:

[jet]

When Harry was introduced at the UN, the guy got his title wrong - and called him the Duke of Wessex. Ouch!:hehe:

[hijaxers]

People will still try and disagree with that....for trolling purposes.:joker:

Surprised they've not arrived already ! :laugh:

[Cherie]

https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-awkward-hand-holding-video-un-viral-twitter-1725929

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's Awkward Hand-Holding Video at U.N. Goes Viral

Scroll down to ‘Something is very wrong here’ video. There is nothing consensual about this.
Meghan takes Harry’s hand and he pulls it away, she takes it again and he pulls away again.
She then takes it AGAIN and this time holds onto it by holding his arm down.
He is pointedly avoiding looking at her. He looks bloody pissed off and miserable.

Yeah sorry that is not normal PDA stuff where both parties are comfortable, I am sure someone will come along to say they and their boyfriend are regularly seen like this...yikes!

[rusticgal]

harry has never been comfortable doing events like that so i'm not surprised


But he is a ‘free’ man…he doesn’t have to do anything anymore :shrug:

[Beso]

Does anyone know who else made speeches?

[Glenn.]

Don’t worry harry mummy will rub it better.

The explanations some members are coming up with.

People in Normal adult relationship don’t feel the need to hold onto or touch one another especially in public.

Who looked in control in that clip because it sure wasn’t harry.

Like the time she wiped the lipstick of his face making him appear child like and help less.

People in normal adult relationships definitely feel the need to touch each other when they see fit. I feel sorry that your toxic masculinity or lack of experience in a relationship stops you from seeing that.

[Niamh.]

Don’t worry harry mummy will rub it better.

The explanations some members are coming up with.

People in Normal adult relationship don’t feel the need to hold onto or touch one another especially in public.

Who looked in control in that clip because it sure wasn’t harry.

Like the time she wiped the lipstick of his face making him appear child like and help less.

What? You don't hold hands or link or rub your other halves arm or hand in public ever? You're missing out. I even do that with my two adult(ish) kids, not hold hands but put an arm around them or rub their arms etc :laugh: I'm not a very tactile person in general but I am with Gav and the kids :love:

[Swan]

Im not arsed about their public affection for each other (her holding his hand/arm/whatever could also be a reassurance/security thing for her), but my god are they preachy. I don't understand their self appointed level of importance?!

[Swan]

Like, practice what you preach. Did he REALLY need to fly all that way in his private jet to give a speech about climate and carbon footprints? Could he not just have done it via satellite/video call? Wouldn't that make more sense giving one of the subjects he doesn't stop preaching about?

[AnnieK]

Like, practice what you preach. Did he REALLY need to fly all that way in his private jet to give a speech about climate and carbon footprints? Could he not just have done it via satellite/video call? Wouldn't that make more sense giving one of the subjects he doesn't stop preaching about?

See this is what annoys me with the Meghan and Harry thing. There is a lot to criticise them about - as you have pointed out above but the headlines and most discussion is more about things like her stroking his arm, or their relationship (which no-one actually knows about).

I would rather be disgusted about their carbon footprint whilst discussing climate issues, or if the bullying allegations have been proven rather than whether she stroked his arm or not.

[Swan]

See this is what annoys me with the Meghan and Harry thing. There is a lot to criticise them about - as you have pointed out above but the headlines and most discussion is more about things like her stroking his arm, or their relationship (which no-one actually knows about).

I would rather be disgusted about their carbon footprint whilst discussing climate issues, or if the bullying allegations have been proven rather than whether she stroked his arm or not.

Yep same. Like when she rubbed her belly when pregnant, couldn't care less. It's all their preachy sh1t i have a problem with. And things like promoting their brand with their royal titles but yet very critical of the monarchy . Soooooo much other actually important things could be discussed.

[Swan]

The Harry and Meghan argument has literally become a Left and Right political thing now. It shouldn't be like that in theory.

[thesheriff443]

People in normal adult relationships definitely feel the need to touch each other when they see fit. I feel sorry that your toxic masculinity or lack of experience in a relationship stops you from seeing that.

As usual you haven’t got a glue but it hasn’t stopped you after all these years so carry on talking bollox

[thesheriff443]

What? You don't hold hands or link or rub your other halves arm or hand in public ever? You're missing out. I even do that with my two adult(ish) kids, not hold hands but put an arm around them or rub their arms etc :laugh: I'm not a very tactile person in general but I am with Gav and the kids :love:

I’m well aware of what women like thank you very much and having a 27 year old Autistic daughter I’m often holding her hand when crossing roads or in other situations

The thread is about Meghan and harry and it’s Meghan touching harry and he isn’t even looking at her so it’s not a mutual thing

We have seen many times when it’s Meghan who wants to dominate

[AnnieK]

I’m well aware of what women like thank you very much and having a 27 year old Autistic daughter I’m often holding her hand when crossing roads or in other situations

The thread is about Meghan and harry and it’s Meghan touching harry and he isn’t even looking at her so it’s not a mutual thing

We have seen many times when it’s Meghan who wants to dominate

Aw, come on Sheriff. You said people in normal adult relationships don't touch in public which is just not true.

Many people don't but equally as many will. You can't say its not normal and then just say its about Meghan when you generalised public displays of affection for all normal people.

[Niamh.]

Aw, come on Sheriff. You said people in normal adult relationships don't touch in public which is just not true.



Many people don't but equally as many will. You can't say its not normal and then just say its about Meghan when you generalised public displays of affection for all normal people.Exactly, I was just responding to something he said about "normal adult relationships" :shrug:

[jet]

What? You don't hold hands or link or rub your other halves arm or hand in public ever? You're missing out. I even do that with my two adult(ish) kids, not hold hands but put an arm around them or rub their arms etc :laugh: I'm not a very tactile person in general but I am with Gav and the kids :love:

All that is normal enough, depending on how tactile an individial is, but this isn't.....

Originally Posted by jet View Post
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harr...witter-1725929

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's Awkward Hand-Holding Video at U.N. Goes Viral

Scroll down to ‘Something is very wrong here’ video. There is nothing consensual about this.
Meghan takes Harry’s hand and he pulls it away, she takes it again and he pulls away again.
She then takes it AGAIN and this time holds onto it by holding his arm down.
He is pointedly avoiding looking at her. He looks bloody pissed off and miserable.

[Swan]

In my longest relationship, it wasn't overly publicly affectionate. But when she was feeling a little anxious, she'd hold my hand and i'd stroke her hand with my thumb to reassure her. These are normal things, right?!

[The Slim Reaper]

Sheriff has more notches on his bedpost than Russell Brand. If he says he knows what women like, then he damn well knows. He forced himself into a 7yr relationship just to give the rest of us a chance, like a true alpha. Stop hatin' ladies.

[The Slim Reaper]

https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-awkward-hand-holding-video-un-viral-twitter-1725929

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's Awkward Hand-Holding Video at U.N. Goes Viral

Scroll down to ‘Something is very wrong here’ video. There is nothing consensual about this.
Meghan takes Harry’s hand and he pulls it away, she takes it again and he pulls away again.
She then takes it AGAIN and this time holds onto it by holding his arm down.
He is pointedly avoiding looking at her. He looks bloody pissed off and miserable.

All that is normal enough, depending on how tactile an individial is, but this isn't.....

Originally Posted by jet View Post
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harr...witter-1725929

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's Awkward Hand-Holding Video at U.N. Goes Viral

Scroll down to ‘Something is very wrong here’ video. There is nothing consensual about this.
Meghan takes Harry’s hand and he pulls it away, she takes it again and he pulls away again.
She then takes it AGAIN and this time holds onto it by holding his arm down.
He is pointedly avoiding looking at her. He looks bloody pissed off and miserable.

https://y.yarn.co/6960a060-9955-49b1-bb59-8d2c7c68db2a_text.gif

[thesheriff443]

Sheriff has more notches on his bedpost than Russell Brand. If he says he knows what women like, then he damn well knows. He forced himself into a 7yr relationship just to give the rest of us a chance, like a true alpha. Stop hatin' ladies.

Seriously grow the fcuk, you got a problem with me come out and say it like a man

And yes I am an alpha male.

[Swan]

Im an alpha male too -

https://c.tenor.com/Bos7GcKSaicAAAAM/kappa-turkishedits.gif

Im so alpha they call me Alfie

[Crimson Dynamo]

im an alpha male too -

https://c.tenor.com/bos7gcksaicaaaam/kappa-turkishedits.gif

im so alpha they call me alfie

was that not your avatar back in the day?

[The Slim Reaper]

Seriously grow the fcuk, you got a problem with me come out and say it like a man

And yes I am an alpha male.

You see sheriff, here's my problem. You try to be funny all the time and fail miserably, but the minute someone pokes a little fun in your direction, you get all serious and start trying to act tough, and it just comes off as this dude:

https://c.tenor.com/Hwng2tXQ_HAAAAAC/kev-alpha-male.gif

[Swan]

was that not your avatar back in the day?

Yeah i think it was actually.

[Crimson Dynamo]

You see sheriff, here's my problem. You try to be funny all the time and fail miserably, but the minute someone pokes a little fun in your direction, you get all serious and start trying to act tough, and it just comes off as this dude:

https://c.tenor.com/Hwng2tXQ_HAAAAAC/kev-alpha-male.gif

he can cram his dick up his arse you know

the secret is to put it up flaccid and then..

hey presto


(not Sherrif I mean but Kev)

[The Slim Reaper]

he can cram his dick up his arse you know

the secret is to put it up flaccid and then..

hey presto


(not Sherrif I mean but Kev)

:joker:

[thesheriff443]

You see sheriff, here's my problem. You try to be funny all the time and fail miserably, but the minute someone pokes a little fun in your direction, you get all serious and start trying to act tough, and it just comes off as this dude:

https://c.tenor.com/Hwng2tXQ_HAAAAAC/kev-alpha-male.gif

No, the reason you left last time round you think your funny taking the p1ss but you get put in your place every time and since being back you trued do the same and no one is interested.

You tried to dictate what was being posted a while back but admin won’t be told what can and can’t be posted

You came in this thread being sarcastic about members being experts on mental health

People don’t like your fantacy womean Meghan that’s why you come in these r
Threads baiting members.

I’m the same person on and off the forum, yes I’ve had loads of women and yea I can handle myself.

It’s not my fault you can’t keep a woman or fight you way out of a wet paper bag

And using the word dude is effin lame.

[Glenn.]

As usual you haven’t got a glue but it hasn’t stopped you after all these years so carry on talking bollox

That doesn’t even make any sense. If that’s your stance on relationships then I pity the poor woman shacked up with you (if she exists)

As many have pointed out it’s an extremely normal thing to do so maybe you’re just not normal

[The Slim Reaper]

No, the reason you left last time round you think your funny taking the p1ss but you get put in your place every time and since being back you trued do the same and no one is interested.

You tried to dictate what was being posted a while back but admin won’t be told what can and can’t be posted

You came in this thread being sarcastic about members being experts on mental health

People don’t like your fantacy womean Meghan that’s why you come in these r
Threads baiting members.

I’m the same person on and off the forum, yes I’ve had loads of women and yea I can handle myself.

It’s not my fault you can’t keep a woman or fight you way out of a wet paper bag

And using the word dude is effin lame.

I left because I'd had enough, and not too long after winning Most Loved when there were lots of members voting (not like today), so maybe that first point doesn't quite add up. :smug:

I haven't baited anyone, but the fact you think I have shows what I was talking about in my previous post - you get angry and try to act like a hard man whenever someone pokes fun at you.

That's your one true strength in my eyes - I believe you when you tell me you're exactly the same on or off the forum.

I apologise for using dude - I just don't have the brain power to use words like fantacy womean.

Alphas don't need to remind folks constantly that they're alphas :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

That doesn’t even make any sense. If that’s your stance on relationships then I pity the poor woman shacked up with you (if she exists)

As many have pointed out it’s an extremely normal thing to do so maybe you’re just not normal

I’ve not shacked up with a woman and she definitely doesn’t need your pity, I’ve just bought her a new fiat 500 to replace the Audi TT convertible I bought her for her birthday.

And I didn’t buy it for her because I had to it was because I wanted too.

And sorry to point out the elephant in the room but you are in a gay relationship and even though it’s accepted it’s the normal when it comes to relationship

So stick to men and leave women to the heterosexual’s

[The Slim Reaper]

https://thenewdaily.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/oprah-you-get-a-car-gif-7.gif

[Glenn.]

I’ve not shacked up with a woman and she definitely doesn’t need your pity, I’ve just bought her a new fiat 500 to replace the Audi TT convertible I bought her for her birthday.

And I didn’t buy it for her because I had to it was because I wanted too.

And sorry to point out the elephant in the room but you are in a gay relationship and even though it’s accepted it’s the normal when it comes to relationship

So stick to men and leave women to the heterosexual’s

That was a car crash of a post. Pun intended.

A relationship is a relationship no matter who’s involved you silly man

[Glenn.]

I can’t actually believe how stupid that post was :joker: :joker: :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Josy arrives in the nick of time..

https://media1.giphy.com/media/NV4cSrRYXXwfUcYnua/giphy.gif

[The Slim Reaper]

Josy arrives in the nick of time..

https://media1.giphy.com/media/NV4cSrRYXXwfUcYnua/giphy.gif

If she's quick she might get a new motor :laugh:

[thesheriff443]

If she's quick she might get a new motor :laugh:

You are totally oblivious to how pathetic you sound.

[Cherie]

In my longest relationship, it wasn't overly publicly affectionate. But when she was feeling a little anxious, she'd hold my hand and i'd stroke her hand with my thumb to reassure her. These are normal things, right?!

of course, but if she pulled her hand away and you grabbed it back and carried on reassuring her when it was clear she didnt need or want it, that would be abnormal imo

[Glenn.]

You are totally oblivious to how pathetic you sound.

Pot kettle

[thesheriff443]

Pot kettle

Keep stirring an empty pot.

[Glenn.]

That’s not stirring a pot. It’s stating fact.