Markle releases new Podcast

[Crimson Dynamo]

The Times gave it one star out of 5 and James Marriott in The Times described
it as a 'tastefully soundtracked parade of banalities, absurdities and self-
aggrandising Californian platitudes'.


Celia Walden in the Telegraph said it was 'an interview with this inspirational
sporting figure in name only', and that Meghan was 'interviewing herself'.


She also said the Duchess was the sort of person 'who hijacks every
distressing anecdote with one of their own – only theirs is longer drawn-out,
more distressing'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11140809/Reviews-Meghan-Markles-Archetypes-podcast-Spotify-Serena-Williams.html


xwO8FFbGUVA

[Gusto Brunt]

Apparently she was describing a fictitious fire. Don't you call that poetic licence. In other words lying. :p

[hijaxers]

Well she's excelled herself with this one , she's a laughing stock :laugh: and with good reason.

[Cherie]

A fire broke out in Archies bedroom :joker: I mean really was the nanny burning incense or playing with matches?

[bots]

i'm so overjoyed that we are going to hear the real Meghan unfiltered. It's what we have all been waiting on. I will be perched for each word :flutter:

[Beso]

I cant believe she called harry her now husband.

[Gusto Brunt]

I cant believe she called harry her now husband.

Disgraceful.

[Jordan.]

Oh wow the fanatics finally getting their eagerly awaited podcast they were so concerned about her not releasing anything.

[hijaxers]

Oh wow the fanatics finally getting their eagerly awaited podcast they were so concerned about her not releasing anything.

Eagerly awaited ! are you for real :laugh: not fanantic's either , happy if she never makes another. Not even watched, but when its all over news being shoved down our throats what an idiot she's making of herself :shrug:

[Oliver_W]

One has to wonder what Prince Harry saw in her - by all accounts he always wanted to live away from the Royal Family at large and the pappzos, and live in Africa doing good works. Why would he want to shack up with an actress who only wants to be famous, floating around the vapid LA scene?

[rusticgal]

Embarrassing…

[thesheriff443]

Self indulgent

[Beso]

Eagerly awaited ! are you for real :laugh: not fanantic's either , happy if she never makes another. Not even watched, but when its all over news being shoved down our throats what an idiot she's making of herself :shrug:

I kinda hope she keeps making them in a way.:hehe:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Going on and on about how its hard for a woman to be ambitious and sitting opposite of her is the most successful female Tennis player in history

You could not make it up

:laugh2:

[Crimson Dynamo]

yQul_amcYTg

[The Slim Reaper]

At least she has a number of keen listeners in this thread, all pretending they're not bothered. :hehe:

[Cherie]

She is great for a laugh in these grim times :joker:

[Oliver_W]

At least she has a number of keen listeners in this thread, all pretending they're not bothered. :hehe:

I'm not gonna listen to it, I wouldn't know anything she gets up to without her every move being publicised here :joker: but yeah I agree most of her "audience" are probably hate-listening.

[Liam-]

All those people pretending not to be interested in her, rushing to listen to find the smallest something to slag her off about

[Beso]

All those people pretending not to be interested in her, rushing to listen to find the smallest something to slag her off about

Me.

[The Slim Reaper]

I'm not gonna listen to it, I wouldn't know anything she gets up to without her every move being publicised here :joker: but yeah I agree most of her "audience" are probably hate-listening.

I definitely won't be listening to it, but it's pure chefs kiss to see the obsessions kick in to overdrive whenever she breathes :laugh:

[Jordan.]

All those people pretending not to be interested in her, rushing to listen to find the smallest something to slag her off about

Such a bitter existence bless them.

[Oliver_W]

All those people pretending not to be interested in her, rushing to listen to find the smallest something to slag her off about

I only ever hear about her when people are slagging her off, and even that's too much.

[Oliver_W]

I definitely won't be listening to it, but it's pure chefs kiss to see the obsessions kick in to overdrive whenever she breathes :laugh:

Oh no I agree! I wouldn't even say I don't like her, I nothing her, so I don't go looking her up. But if I did dislike a public figure, the last thing I'd do is follow what they're up to, or give them the publicity I think they're addicted to :joker:

[Swan]

All those people pretending not to be interested in her, rushing to listen to find the smallest something to slag her off about

I wanna ask you a genuine question, im not trying to one up you, whatever you say i'll accept (i've made my anti royal views very clear on here anyway). But my question is - What do you actually like about her as a person? Like do you think she's a great Duchess and making a real difference?

I wont argue with you, we all have different opinions, but seriously, i just dont see what there is to like. Change my mind.

[Beso]

I have a ten word tic list that I tic when she is being one of the words whenever she talks about anything(or herself as it should be known)

It makes me feel good to tic each word whilst uttering "I was right about that on TIBB" each time she does talk.

Ive never felt this alive since helen woods appearence in BB.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I have a ten word tic list that I tic when she is being one of the words whenever she talks about anything(or herself as it should be known)

It makes me feel good to tic each word whilst uttering "I was right about that on TIBB" each time she does talk.

Ive never felt this alive since helen woods appearence in BB.

I think we all feel this Parmy (minus 3)


being right is such a great feeling

:hee:

[jet]

Like Swan did, I've asked the question to the few fans she has here "what do you find so likeable about Meghan" but there was never a genuine effort to answer.

Reviews of the podcast are damning, and no wonder:

STEERPIKE - THE SPECTATOR
Meghan's Archetypes podcast is really all about her
'The first guest is Serena Williams, but tennis enthusiasts who tune in might be a bit disappointed. The show is in fact all about Meghan, since it takes 11 minutes for Serena to barely get a word in edgeways.'
'It's hard to believe that it took 28 people, including eight executive producers, to make the episode – plus Meghan herself, who is also listed as an 'executive producer' in the credits.'

WTH?

HILARY ROSE – THE TIMES
Meghan's podcast: an insight about her private life? Yes, another one
'In hindsight, I should have beaten myself unconscious an hour ago with a copy of Finding Freedom. Instead, I've listened to 57 minutes and 28 seconds of Meghan Markle's syrupy California drawl, while rocking back and forth and moaning softly under my breath.'

'It seems to be an allegory of all the many ways in which she, a fierce, strong, brave woman was wronged and traduced in the ten minutes she lived in the UK and was fêted as the best thing to happen to the royal family in years. Her podcast is pure, narcissistic gibberish and next week she's 'in conversation' with Mariah Carey. Shoot me now.'

ANGELA LEVIN – MAILONLINE
'She would still be a D-list celebrity if she had not married a prince. She aligns herself with them [Serena Williams and next podcast guest Mariah Carey], but they have done brilliantly and overcome difficult childhood, whereas she has married a prince and spent a lot of money.'

[rusticgal]

I wanna ask you a genuine question, im not trying to one up you, whatever you say i'll accept (i've made my anti royal views very clear on here anyway). But my question is - What do you actually like about her as a person? Like do you think she's a great Duchess and making a real difference?

I wont argue with you, we all have different opinions, but seriously, i just dont see what there is to like. Change my mind.

The truth is Swan…none of them like her…none of them can categorically say anything positive about her despite being asked on several posts… they simply never reply :laugh:

[Jordan.]

Reviews of the podcast are damning, and no wonder:

STEERPIKE - THE SPECTATOR
Meghan's Archetypes podcast is really all about her
'The first guest is Serena Williams, but tennis enthusiasts who tune in might be a bit disappointed. The show is in fact all about Meghan, since it takes 11 minutes for Serena to barely get a word in edgeways.'
'It's hard to believe that it took 28 people, including eight executive producers, to make the episode – plus Meghan herself, who is also listed as an 'executive producer' in the credits.'

WTH?

HILARY ROSE – THE TIMES
Meghan's podcast: an insight about her private life? Yes, another one
'In hindsight, I should have beaten myself unconscious an hour ago with a copy of Finding Freedom. Instead, I've listened to 57 minutes and 28 seconds of Meghan Markle's syrupy California drawl, while rocking back and forth and moaning softly under my breath.'

'It seems to be an allegory of all the many ways in which she, a fierce, strong, brave woman was wronged and traduced in the ten minutes she lived in the UK and was fêted as the best thing to happen to the royal family in years. Her podcast is pure, narcissistic gibberish and next week she's 'in conversation' with Mariah Carey. Shoot me now.'

ANGELA LEVIN – MAILONLINE
'She would still be a D-list celebrity if she had not married a prince. She aligns herself with them [Serena Williams and next podcast guest Mariah Carey], but they have done brilliantly and overcome difficult childhood, whereas she has married a prince and spent a lot of money.'

3 reviews... meanwhile it's currently rated a 4.2/5 stars on Spotify based on 10,000 reviews :hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

3 reviews... meanwhile it's currently rated a 4.2/5 stars on Spotify based on 10,000 reviews :hee:

:laugh2:

[Beso]

3 reviews... meanwhile it's currently rated a 4.2/5 stars on Spotify based on 10,000 reviews :hee:

Only her fans bother to review it, and thats all they could muster.

[Jordan.]

Only her fans bother to review it, and thats all they could muster.

I'm sure there's a trickle of haters in the reviews.. after they got the tech help on how to do it.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I'm sure there's a trickle of haters in the reviews.. after they got the tech help on how to do it.

m8te the "haters" stuff is 2020

you are exposed

deal with it

:joker:

[Beso]

I'm sure there's a trickle of haters in the reviews.. after they got the tech help on how to do it.

Im fairly confident they all deleted there spotify accounts when she first mentioned the words podcast and spotify...

So you cant blame them for the minus points.

[Jordan.]

m8te the "haters" stuff is 2020

you are exposed

deal with it

:joker:

He says putting and 8 in mate like it's 2002.

[Crimson Dynamo]

it hurtz

i get it

https://media3.giphy.com/media/hTY1mRFsHHZR7tfaMh/200w.gif?cid=82a1493bs6k23cftyes9a04mh5b0kq9oogdqh u1b9b74yg3i&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

[Swan]

The truth is Swan…none of them like her…none of them can categorically say anything positive about her despite being asked on several posts… they simply never reply :laugh:

Yeah they never say anything positive about her, they just brand people who call out her blatant self indulged and deluded self importance as "Meghan Haters"

It's actually ****ing pathetic. Like worryingly weird.

Basically, they defend her because she's half black and think everyone who doesn't like her is racist. Extreme left looking for racism in the Monarchy when it clearly isn't there. It's beyond strange at this point.

[Beso]

He says putting and 8 in mate like it's 2002.


Try and answer swans question...its been a fun night tonight, lets not stop now.

[Jordan.]

ChnXPuXvww7
serenawilliams
I loved talking about so many important topics with my dear friend Meghan as her first guest on #archetypes for @spotify! It’s out now and worth the listen, especially if you’re ambitious ❤️

Lovely picture of Serena and Meghan. Remember that gossip rag book (probably not) that claimed Meghan was lying about their friendship :joker:

[GoldHeart]

The truth is Swan…none of them like her…none of them can categorically say anything positive about her despite being asked on several posts… they simply never reply :laugh:

Once again you fail to see ,that it's not about being a fan or liking Meghan. Some of us just aren't that fussed about Meghan and Harry ,and we don't follow them 24/7 in the media.

I find it fascinating that the people who dislike her / or them both , seem to give us a reoccurring update & a running commentary.Yes I understand things will pop up on Google about celebrity news & Meghan and Harry ....blah blah. But I usually ignore it.

[Beso]

ChnXPuXvww7
serenawilliams
I loved talking about so many important topics with my dear friend Meghan as her first guest on #archetypes for @spotify! It’s out now and worth the listen, especially if you’re ambitious ❤️

Lovely picture of Serena and Meghan. Remember that gossip rag book (probably not) that claimed Meghan was lying about their friendship :joker:




What adorable nail varnish that toddler has on.

[Crimson Dynamo]

such ambition

:laugh2:

[Beso]

Meghan, hand inserted into her front pocket trying ever so hard to not pose like princess diane...

Sickening.

[Cherie]

Like Swan did, I've asked the question to the few fans she has here "what do you find so likeable about Meghan" but there was never a genuine effort to answer.

Reviews of the podcast are damning, and no wonder:

STEERPIKE - THE SPECTATOR
Meghan's Archetypes podcast is really all about her
'The first guest is Serena Williams, but tennis enthusiasts who tune in might be a bit disappointed. The show is in fact all about Meghan, since it takes 11 minutes for Serena to barely get a word in edgeways.'
'It's hard to believe that it took 28 people, including eight executive producers, to make the episode – plus Meghan herself, who is also listed as an 'executive producer' in the credits.'

WTH?

HILARY ROSE – THE TIMES
Meghan's podcast: an insight about her private life? Yes, another one
'In hindsight, I should have beaten myself unconscious an hour ago with a copy of Finding Freedom. Instead, I've listened to 57 minutes and 28 seconds of Meghan Markle's syrupy California drawl, while rocking back and forth and moaning softly under my breath.'

'It seems to be an allegory of all the many ways in which she, a fierce, strong, brave woman was wronged and traduced in the ten minutes she lived in the UK and was fêted as the best thing to happen to the royal family in years. Her podcast is pure, narcissistic gibberish and next week she's 'in conversation' with Mariah Carey. Shoot me now.'

ANGELA LEVIN – MAILONLINE
'She would still be a D-list celebrity if she had not married a prince. She aligns herself with them [Serena Williams and next podcast guest Mariah Carey], but they have done brilliantly and overcome difficult childhood, whereas she has married a prince and spent a lot of money.'

:joker:

[rusticgal]

Once again you fail to see ,that it's not about being a fan or liking Meghan. Some of us just aren't that fussed about Meghan and Harry ,and we don't follow them 24/7 in the media.

I find it fascinating that the people who dislike her / or them both , seem to give us a reoccurring update & a running commentary.Yes I understand things will pop up on Google about celebrity news & Meghan and Harry ....blah blah. But I usually ignore it.


No..you fail to see that those that come on here to trash those that actually have an opinion on her fail to have a positive opinion on her and fail to offer any debate on what she does is worthy of criticism… For someone who doesn’t give a flying **** about them you never fail to defend those very people.

No one comes on here and gives any validity to what she says and does apart from trashing people who actually have an opinion on her….including yourself.

[rusticgal]

Try and answer swans question...its been a fun night tonight, lets not stop now.


They obviously can’t…:laugh:

[Jordan.]

No..you fail to see that those that come on here to trash those that actually have an opinion on her fail to have a positive opinion on her and fail to offer any debate on what she does is worthy of criticism… For someone who doesn’t give a flying **** about them you never fail to defend those very people.

No one comes on here and gives any validity to what she says and does apart from trashing people who actually have an opinion on her….including yourself.

How laughable you think making nasty comments about Meghan is offering an opinion.

This thread is about a podcast you haven't even listened to, what makes you think your opinion on the matter is worth debating? :joker:

[Beso]

They obviously can’t…:laugh:

Still cant.

And would rather go on about nasty comments, because they cant come to terms with its proper name which is, nasty truths.

[Jordan.]

Once again you fail to see ,that it's not about being a fan or liking Meghan. Some of us just aren't that fussed about Meghan and Harry ,and we don't follow them 24/7 in the media.

I find it fascinating that the people who dislike her / or them both , seem to give us a reoccurring update & a running commentary.Yes I understand things will pop up on Google about celebrity news & Meghan and Harry ....blah blah. But I usually ignore it.

They're blinkered goldie x

[Beso]

Once again you fail to see ,that it's not about being a fan or liking Meghan. Some of us just aren't that fussed about Meghan and Harry ,and we don't follow them 24/7 in the media.

I find it fascinating that the people who dislike her / or them both , seem to give us a reoccurring update & a running commentary.Yes I understand things will pop up on Google about celebrity news & Meghan and Harry ....blah blah. But I usually ignore it.



Im the opposite, when it pops up, and I can find a reason to discredit her and her actions in the story, Im right on it.

Ive never liked butterfly collectors like her, and him...him, hes just another spoilt rotten,flunked at school useless sideshow.

An easy royal butterfly for the devious collector to consume.

[GoldHeart]

No..you fail to see that those that come on here to trash those that actually have an opinion on her fail to have a positive opinion on her and fail to offer any debate on what she does is worthy of criticism… For someone who doesn’t give a flying **** about them you never fail to defend those very people.

No one comes on here and gives any validity to what she says and does apart from trashing people who actually have an opinion on her….including yourself.

Basically what you're saying is like for e.g ... If I decided to start watching the Kardashians( never going to happen as I can't stand TV shows like that) . And if I kept slagging down Kim & her family, yet continued to obsess over them & watch their reality show. . confusing really.

Meghan is criticised for the way she talks,breathes & stands practically. I didn't even know she had a podcast out , if people don't like her then don't listen to it. But it's clear as day .. people want to scratch that itch & still tune in just to complain about her , which literally makes no sense to me .

If some people are curious & want to see what her podcast or program or whatever is about....then ok . But if you already know you'll hate or find fault in something with someone you dislike,then why moan about it? .

It's not even about giving validity to anything Meghan does, and it's not about saying positive things about her . There's some people out there who literally don't care enough to have an opinion of Meghan, so whether you want to think it's 2 camps of 'meghan lovers' & 'meghan haters' , Meghan and Harry still don't affect my life & I wish them well.

[Beso]

Basically what you're saying is like for e.g ... If I decided to start watching the Kardashians( never going to happen as I can't stand TV shows like that) . And if I kept slagging down Kim & her family, yet continued to obsess over them & watch their reality show. . confusing really.

Meghan is criticised for the way she talks,breathes & stands practically. I didn't even know she had a podcast out , if people don't like her then don't listen to it. But it's clear as day .. people want to scratch that itch & still tune in just to complain about her , which literally makes no sense to me .

If some people are curious & want to see what her podcast or program or whatever is about....then ok . But if you already know you'll hate or find fault in something with someone you dislike,then why moan about it? .

It's not even about giving validity to anything Meghan does, and it's not about saying positive things about her . There's some people out there who literally don't care enough to have an opinion of Meghan, so whether you want to think it's 2 camps of 'meghan lovers' & 'meghan haters' , Meghan and Harry still don't affect my life & I wish them well.



So why come into a thread about her if the only thing you really feel like saying is not about her?

You are by far the least worse for doing that to be honest with you.

[Jordan.]

Basically what you're saying is like for e.g ... If I decided to start watching the Kardashians( never going to happen as I can't stand TV shows like that) . And if I kept slagging down Kim & her family, yet continued to obsess over them & watch their reality show. . confusing really.

Meghan is criticised for the way she talks,breathes & stands practically. I didn't even know she had a podcast out , if people don't like her then don't listen to it. But it's clear as day .. people want to scratch that itch & still tune in just to complain about her , which literally makes no sense to me .

If some people are curious & want to see what her podcast or program or whatever is about....then ok . But if you already know you'll hate or find fault in something with someone you dislike,then why moan about it? .

It's not even about giving validity to anything Meghan does, and it's not about saying positive things about her . There's some people out there who literally don't care enough to have an opinion of Meghan, so whether you want to think it's 2 camps of 'meghan lovers' & 'meghan haters' , Meghan and Harry still don't affect my life & I wish them well.

Great post goldie, it's refreshing to someone on here have a mature and rational approach to things they dislike. I think generally in life the majority of people share your mentality and just avoid these things but sadly there is always going to be those that gain personal satisfaction from being part of a mob and tearing others down. Meghan has continuously proven to be a tough cookie to crack and I'm sure that riles them even more. If anyone wants to know what is admirable about her let's begin with her tenacity :flutter:

[Beso]

Her privaliged tenacity..


Im sure everyone can associate with that.

[Jordan.]

Her privaliged tenacity..


Im sure everyone can associate with that.

How satisfied did that make you

[Crimson Dynamo]

How satisfied did that make you

https://www.imgur.com/s3ZjlsH.gif

[thesheriff443]

Meghan is as genuine as a photo copied 20 pound note

[Oliver_W]

Meghan is as genuine as a photo copied 20 pound note

So are most celebs tbf, phoniness isn't really something to drag her over.

[jet]

Meghan never puts herself in a position where her views could be challenged. The Oprah interview, the podcasts where sycophantic rich celebrities boost each other’s egos and whine about how hard their lives are. That’s cowardice and safe attention seeking.

I’d have some respect for Meghan if she actually engaged in a debate or an interview where the interviewer was allowed to ask some hard questions. Or if she actually DID something useful to help people, you know, ACTION, instead of making preachy speeches or sitting on her behind spouting a lot of wokey Californian platitudes with the help of a dozen plus producers (28 people worked on it in total!)
She never has anything new or innovative to say, it’s all been done before, and much better. In the end, it’s all about ME ME ME, with her signature move as a poor victim and a few more sympathy seeking tall tales always thrown in somewhere in the mix.

[rusticgal]

How laughable you think making nasty comments about Meghan is offering an opinion.

:



:facepalm:

[rusticgal]

So why come into a thread about her if the only thing you really feel like saying is not about her?

You are by far the least worse for doing that to be honest with you.


Exactly...

[rusticgal]

Basically what you're saying is like for e.g ... If I decided to start watching the Kardashians( never going to happen as I can't stand TV shows like that) . And if I kept slagging down Kim & her family, yet continued to obsess over them & watch their reality show. . confusing really.

Meghan is criticised for the way she talks,breathes & stands practically. I didn't even know she had a podcast out , if people don't like her then don't listen to it. But it's clear as day .. people want to scratch that itch & still tune in just to complain about her , which literally makes no sense to me .

If some people are curious & want to see what her podcast or program or whatever is about....then ok . But if you already know you'll hate or find fault in something with someone you dislike,then why moan about it? .

It's not even about giving validity to anything Meghan does, and it's not about saying positive things about her . There's some people out there who literally don't care enough to have an opinion of Meghan, so whether you want to think it's 2 camps of 'meghan lovers' & 'meghan haters' , Meghan and Harry still don't affect my life & I wish them well.


I have an interest and like of the Royal family which is why I have an opinion on each and everyone of them....which is why I will get involved in any debate about them.
Does that clear it up for you?
Meghan puts herself out there with her opinions...and if you are going to do that then expect to be judged.
I'm not interested in listening to her hour long drivel...but I am entitled to comment on the snipets I see.

[rusticgal]

Meghan never puts herself in a position where her views could be challenged. The Oprah interview, the podcasts where sycophantic rich celebrities boost each other’s egos and whine about how hard their lives are. That’s cowardice and safe attention seeking.

I’d have some respect for Meghan if she actually engaged in a debate or an interview where the interviewer was allowed to ask some hard questions. Or if she actually DID something useful to help people, you know, ACTION, instead of making preachy speeches or sitting on her behind spouting a lot of wokey Californian platitudes with the help of a dozen plus producers (28 people worked on it in total!)
She never has anything new or innovative to say, it’s all been done before, and much better. In the end, it’s all about ME ME ME, with her signature move as a poor victim and a few more sympathy seeking tall tales always thrown in somewhere in the mix.


Absolutely....if there was an opportunity to be interviewed by someone who would challenge her she would run a mile..:laugh:

[Cherie]

The argument that we can't comment on a current new item is nonsense, we comment on plenty news stories, why would Meghan finally releasing her pod cast be any different, as above I won't be listening to it any more than I wasted time watching the Ophrah interview, the excerpts released are enough

[jet]

No way am I listening to that drivel either, the many snippets and reports are more than enough. Meghan by all accounts drones on and on and Serena can hardly get a word in. It would have been relevant, in a talk about ambition, to hear how Serena, through real hard graft, became the amazing champion she is, rather than the whines and the usual well worn platitudes from a woman who is only being paid millions to do podcasts because she married a Prince.

[jet]

I can’t imagine Mariah Carey letting Meghan talk over her with her ME ME ME. I wonder how much editing will be needed with that episode. :laugh:

[Gusto Brunt]

They're too rich and privileged to think straight. It's like those lottery winners who win crazy amounts like £188Million.

They are like headless chickens running around desperate for something very expensive to spend their money on.

Just because they have it, spend it. That's their barmy motto.

It's quite pathetic really. I'd hate to be someone with all that much money who's basically a waster.

I bet Meghan would rather buy a £4,000 pair of jeans than pay its real worth of about £19.99

[GoldHeart]

Great post goldie, it's refreshing to someone on here have a mature and rational approach to things they dislike. I think generally in life the majority of people share your mentality and just avoid these things but sadly there is always going to be those that gain personal satisfaction from being part of a mob and tearing others down. Meghan has continuously proven to be a tough cookie to crack and I'm sure that riles them even more. If anyone wants to know what is admirable about her let's begin with her tenacity :flutter:


Thanks Jordan :wavey:, I don't even think I can be bothered to go into long lengths about people I dislike in the public eye . Especially if they don't affect my life lol .

[GoldHeart]

The argument that we can't comment on a current new item is nonsense, we comment on plenty news stories, why would Meghan finally releasing her pod cast be any different, as above I won't be listening to it any more than I wasted time watching the Ophrah interview, the excerpts released are enough


Cherie .. nobody is saying you can't talk about Meghan or anyone in discussion topics . Point some of us are making is ....alot of it is so petty & irrelevant to our daily lives.

I don't even know what Meghan & Harry is up to for the most part,but the people who dislike them seem to keep up to date with them.. it's a clear observation .

And nobody has to like Meghan , but the things I've seen written about her is such nit picking weirdness .

And yes of course people in the public eye will be talked about & criticised , it goes with the job so to speak. It just seems like some get more unnecessary grief over others .

This government gets less criticism, and they actually impact us .

[jet]

Thanks Jordan :wavey:, I don't even think I can be bothered to go into long lengths about people I dislike in the public eye . Especially if they don't affect my life lol .

You went to long lengths about Amber Heard, did you not? :hehe:

[Jordan.]

:facepalm:

Back to just posting smilies because you don't have a rebuttal, and you believe you are on the side with great debating skills :skull:

[GoldHeart]

You went to long lengths about Amber Heard, did you not? :hehe:

Nice try
It was televised, and I was following it .. what's your point?? . Meghan & Harry haven't had a public court hearing involving domestic violence,or did I miss something??? .

And I remember stating that the whole Johnny & Amber thing was an ugly situation ,as everything is out there.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Back to just posting smilies because you don't have a rebuttal, and you believe you are on the side with great debating skills :skull:

Jordan having obviously listened to the Podcast what are your thoughts?

[rusticgal]

You went to long lengths about Amber Heard, did you not? :hehe:


Even though she is irrelevant to our Daily lives....:laugh:

[Jordan.]

Jordan having obviously listened to the Podcast what are your thoughts?

I thought it was great, can't wait for the other 11 episodes. She really hit the nail on the head about the type of people who attack ambition women.

[Crimson Dynamo]

ambition women

[rusticgal]

Back to just posting smilies because you don't have a rebuttal, and you believe you are on the side with great debating skills :skull:


Well let me explain your ridiculous comment....

Whether you write something positive or negative about a person..it IS an opinion and part of the debate....:smug:

If you were to discuss the subject matter rather than those that have an opinion on her you might get a bit more respect on here.

[Swan]

She's just another Spice Girl, along with Thatcher etc.

[rusticgal]

I thought it was great, can't wait for the other 11 episodes. She really hit the nail on the head about the type of people who attack ambition women.


Oh do tell us...what did she say???

[GoldHeart]

Even though she is irrelevant to our Daily lives....:laugh:

Here we go again :rolleyes:
It was a public court hearing, and I never shied away from sharing the fact that I was ...watching/ following it ...so sue me ? Lol :shrug: .

You cannot compare the serious allegations of Johnny & Amber's toxic relationship involving VIOLENCE , to Meghan & Harry 'annoying' people . This is the biggest stretch.

[rusticgal]

Nice try
It was televised, and I was following it .. what's your point?? . Meghan & Harry haven't had a public court hearing involving domestic violence,or did I miss something??? .

And I remember stating that the whole Johnny & Amber thing was an ugly situation ,as everything is out there.


They are making Podcasts...having interviews and in the process of making of a Documentary...writing books etc etc all of which is being publicised on the news and Social media...they have had court cases...its no different to you going to great lengths discussing Amber Heard..can you not see that??

[Jordan.]

Well let me explain your ridiculous comment....

Whether you write something positive or negative about a person..it IS an opinion and part of the debate....:smug:

If you were to discuss the subject matter rather than those that have an opinion on her you might get a bit more respect on here.

Why don't YOU discuss the subject matter instead of expecting people to take your playground comments about another woman seriously. Come back when you've actually listened to the Podcast and I'll happily debate it with you as you claim to wish.

[jet]

Nice try
It was televised, and I was following it .. what's your point?? . Meghan & Harry haven't had a public court hearing involving domestic violence,or did I miss something??? .

And I remember stating that the whole Johnny & Amber thing was an ugly situation ,as everything is out there.

Well, you contradicted yourself. :hee:
Meghan and Harry are frequently in the news and in the papers, and we comment on those stories as they appear as we do on any specific Royal news.

It’s weird how people think they can get anywhere by telling posters what they should or shouldn’t be posting about.

[Jordan.]

ambition women

Is that threatening to you? She discusses it in the podcast.

[GoldHeart]

Also I'm not Kate & William's biggest fans , I rarely comment on them.

I'm not a royalist, never have been that invested in any of them .

[Jordan.]

Meghan's podcast is now #1 on Spotify congratulations to her :love:

[Jordan.]

Also I'm not Kate & William's biggest fans , I rarely comment on them.

I'm not a royalist, never have been that invested in any of them .

It's weird how many self proclaimed royalists popped up on here as soon as Meghan came into the picture :skull:

[GoldHeart]

Well, you contradicted yourself. :hee:
Meghan and Harry are frequently in the news and in the papers, and we comment on those stories as they appear as we do on any specific Royal news.

It’s weird how people think they can get anywhere by telling posters what they should or shouldn’t be posting about.

:joker::joker: Yes of course I've contradicted myself , keep telling yourself that . The comparison is so off the mark I'm laughing.

You literally ignore everything I say ,and only selectively pick out what you want to interpret. When did any of us say you can't talk about people in the news & papers ?.

If you scroll back you'll see I said it goes with the job ,but there's still alot of nit picking irrelevant stuff . Saying "Meghan is trying to stand like Diana but has hand in pocket " ? ,What does that even mean,or what has it got to do with anything.

The choice is either you listen to Meghan's podcast or you don't, I don't think anyone has a gun to your head forcing you :hee: .

[rusticgal]

Why don't YOU discuss the subject matter instead of expecting people to take your playground comments about another woman seriously. Come back when you've actually listened to the Podcast and I'll happily debate it with you as you claim to wish.


You have been given the chance to debate it...but you cant because you haven't watched it have you :nono:

[rusticgal]

Meghan's podcast is now #1 on Spotify congratulations to her :love:


For all the wrong reasons...:laugh:

[GoldHeart]

They are making Podcasts...having interviews and in the process of making of a Documentary...writing books etc etc all of which is being publicised on the news and Social media...they have had court cases...its no different to you going to great lengths discussing Amber Heard..can you not see that??

As I keep saying over & over again you can talk & criticise anyone & anything, this is a discussion forum. But it's baffling to me that people would put more energy into slating Meghan when there's a royal thread praising Kate , if you like Kate then why not focus on the positive :hee: .

I went to great lengths on 'amber heard' , because I watched the trial . It's not the same as moaning about Meghan releasing a podcast . I could moan all day about Piers Morgan's TV show. But I just avoid his program .

[Jordan.]

You have been given the chance to debate it...but you cant because you haven't watched it have you :nono:

Yes I have listened, what exactly am I meant to be "debating" when i'm seemingly the only one in this thread who has? As I keep repeating if you'd like to actually inform yourself on the subject matter and maybe highlight a part of the podcast you didn't like I'd be happy to discuss it with you.

[Crimson Dynamo]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is a typically disgusting &amp; defamatory tweet from Britain’s most disgusting race-baiter. My views of Ms Markle have nothing to do with her skin colour, and everything to do with the way she trashes the Royal Family whilst fleecing her royal status for massive financial gain. <a href="https://t.co/sTxwNFMHrM">https://t.co/sTxwNFMHrM</a></p>&mdash; Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1562473920410042369?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">🤣🤣 Is this the ‘silenced’ voice that’s spent the last two years publicly trashing her family for $$$$$$$ ? I’ve seen some deluded lickspittles in my time but this guy’s beyond parody. <a href="https://t.co/Nik12yDYxp">https://t.co/Nik12yDYxp</a></p>&mdash; Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1562484476264849409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[Jordan.]

1562337907951771648

So true. Just an example of how some suddenly became hardcore pro royalist as soon as an black outspoken women entered the picture.

[jet]

:joker::joker: Yes of course I've contradicted myself , keep telling yourself that . The comparison is so off the mark I'm laughing.

You literally ignore everything I say ,and only selectively pick out what you want to interpret. When did any of us say you can't talk about people in the news & papers ?.

If you scroll back you'll see I said it goes with the job ,but there's still alot of nit picking irrelevant stuff . Saying "Meghan is trying to stand like Diana but has hand in pocket " ? ,What does that even mean,or what has it got to do with anything.

The choice is either you listen to Meghan's podcast or you don't, I don't think anyone has a gun to your head forcing you :hee: .

I didn’t post it, so I wouldn’t know what it means.
I post about more serious matters concerning Meghan, like how she passes herself off as a great humanitarian but is really a lazy and privileged proven liar, bully, narcissist and manipulator of young minds for her own self-aggrandizement and greed for easy money.

[rusticgal]

As I keep saying over & over again you can talk & criticise anyone & anything, this is a discussion forum. But it's baffling to me that people would put more energy into slating Meghan when there's a royal thread praising Kate , if you like Kate then why not focus on the positive :hee: .

I went to great lengths on 'amber heard' , because I watched the trial . It's not the same as moaning about Meghan releasing a podcast . I could moan all day about Piers Morgan's TV show. But I just avoid his program .


But thats just it Goldheart....if there was a thread on Piers Morgan you would be on it airing your grievances...and there is nothing wrong with that so what is the difference :shrug:

[GoldHeart]

But thats just it Goldheart....if there was a thread on Piers Morgan you would be on it airing your grievances...and there is nothing wrong with that so what is the difference :shrug:

I've already been there & done that ,I'm tired of talking about Piers Morgan tbh . I don't like him so I feel better to avoid him.

[Crimson Dynamo]

1562337907951771648

So true. Just an example of how some suddenly became hardcore pro royalist as soon as an black outspoken women entered the picture.

she isnt black

her father is white and her mother is black. She is mixed race

at least try and get the basics right

[GoldHeart]

she isnt black

her father is white and her mother is black. She is mixed race

at least try and get the basics right


Get better at trolling, you're just embarrassing yourself now .

A mixed race person still is classed as black, are you to question them in real life about their 'blackness' .

I dare you to tell them they're "not black", especially when they experience racism & name calling from ignorant folk.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Get better at trolling, you're just embarrassing yourself now .

A mixed race person still is classed as black, are you to question them in real life about their 'blackness' .

I dare you to tell them they're "not black", especially when they experience racism & name calling from ignorant folk.

well lets ask Meghan herself..


"In Britain, Meghan Markle’s racial identity sparked a national debate even though she herself explicitly stated back in 2015 that she identifies as biracial."


https://theconversation.com/biracial-britain-why-mixed-race-people-must-be-able-to-decide-their-own-identity-154771

[The Slim Reaper]

she isnt black

her father is white and her mother is black. She is mixed race

at least try and get the basics right

And yet this nuance is completely lost when it comes to ranting about "black on black crime." :blush:

[Crimson Dynamo]

And yet this nuance is completely lost when it comes to ranting about "black on black crime." :blush:

stop ranting about it then slim and save yourself a headache :blush:

[GoldHeart]

well lets ask Meghan herself..


"In Britain, Meghan Markle’s racial identity sparked a national debate even though she herself explicitly stated back in 2015 that she identifies as biracial."


https://theconversation.com/biracial-britain-why-mixed-race-people-must-be-able-to-decide-their-own-identity-154771


AND....
Like I said mixed race/ biracial people are STILL classed as BLACK ! . Her mother is black . Meghan gets called African American.

[jet]

She is mixed race, but it seems Meghan wanted to be portrayed as Caucasian as that is what she put down on her audition applications when applying for acting parts. Which is why she had her hair straightened and her nose refined.
She liked being mistaken for Italian.

She only became vocal about being a 'proud black woman' when it suited her to call everybody racist who dared to criticise her, which does a disservice to all black women who wouldn’t dream of using their skin colour to provoke racial tensions and hide behind. It’s her ace card and it works a treat on the gullible.

[The Slim Reaper]

stop ranting about it then slim and save yourself a headache :blush:

I know you are but what am I? Is vacuous and nonsensical. Even for you. :smug:

[Beso]

Thanks Jordan :wavey:, I don't even think I can be bothered to go into long lengths about people I dislike in the public eye . Especially if they don't affect my life lol .

She says after 3 million pages of johnny depp v amber heard.:hee:

[The Slim Reaper]

She is mixed race, but it seems Meghan wanted to be portrayed as Caucasian as that is what she put down on her audition applications when applying for acting parts. Which is why she had her hair straightened and her nose refined.
She liked being mistaken for Italian.

She only became vocal about being a 'proud black woman' when it suited her to call everybody racist who dared to criticise her, which does a disservice to all black women who wouldn’t dream of using their skin colour to provoke racial tensions and hide behind. It’s her ace card and it works a treat on the gullible.

She plays a mixed race woman in her biggest ever acting role (suits). :laugh:

[Beso]

I thought it was great, can't wait for the other 11 episodes. She really hit the nail on the head about the type of people who attack ambition women.

Did you hear her being racist about kevin costner.

[The Slim Reaper]

https://pressgazette.co.uk/survey-funds-media-coverage-of-meghan-markle-racist/

50% of journalists even said reporting about her was racist.

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://pressgazette.co.uk/survey-funds-media-coverage-of-meghan-markle-racist/

50% of journalists even said reporting about her was racist.

so one imagines 50% said it wasnt?

[jet]

She plays a mixed race woman in her biggest ever acting role (suits). :laugh:

I know. She must have been more successful when she stopped trying to pretend she was something other than who she was.
She probably put 'mixed race' on some applications too though as well as Caucasian - more parts to apply for....

[GoldHeart]

She is mixed race, but it seems Meghan wanted to be portrayed as Caucasian as that is what she put down on her audition applications when applying for acting parts. Which is why she had her hair straightened and her nose refined.
She liked being mistaken for Italian.

She only became vocal about being a 'proud black woman' when it suited her to call everybody racist who dared to criticise her, which does a disservice to all black women who wouldn’t dream of using their skin colour to provoke racial tensions and hide behind. It’s her ace card and it works a treat on the gullible.

Do you have any idea how difficult it is for black people especially black women, in the industry. Meghan being mixed race gave her an advantage & even then it's still tough in the industry. And you're constantly stereotyped & judged on your background & race .

If you don't see the racism Meghan has experienced in the media ,then you must be turning a blind eye.
She's from LA ,yet a dumb headline was written about her as "straight out of Compton". If you can't see the racist stereotyping there then wow .

Meghan seems very proud of her black roots , she's probably had people make ignorant remarks about her skin tone - race all her life. People have different ways of dealing & coping with that .

It's not her fault of people think she can pass for Italian, some light skinned mix race people can pass for white ..but it still doesn't change who they are or where they're from.

What's interesting is when idiots make racist comments in front of them, not realising they're actually black. People show their true colours when they think they're with their own 'kind' .

What right does anyone have to tell Meghan how black she is , she is still black. Her hair & nose have zero to do with it .

Ever think she might have been pressured to change her appearance?. Even Alexandra Burke said the music industry would bully her into changing her hair & skin tone , to be more 'appealing' . It's utterly disgusting really.

[The Slim Reaper]

I know. She must have been more successful when she stopped trying to pretend she was something other than who she was.
She probably put 'mixed race' on some applications too though as well as Caucasian - more parts to apply for....

She probably....

So in other words you have absolutely no idea but have landed upon the only explanation that fits in with your petty repetition?

[Crimson Dynamo]

She probably....

So in other words you have absolutely no idea but have landed upon the only explanation that fits in with your petty repetition?

hey Slim you missed this probably from the post just above your one..

"she's probably had people make ignorant remarks about her skin tone - race all her life."

best tell Goldie that he has no idea too?

[The Slim Reaper]

so one imagines 50% said it wasnt?

Only half of journalists working in the press, think it is a generally racist profession, isn't really a mathematical issue. For decent people, at least..

[GoldHeart]

I know. She must have been more successful when she stopped trying to pretend she was something other than who she was.
She probably put 'mixed race' on some applications too though as well as Caucasian - more parts to apply for....

Have you ever actually filled out a form where they ask your race .

I tell you something , it's alot more than just "mixed race" :hee: .

It asks your nationality aswell as heritage/ background . I've filled out enough to know.

How do you know she put Caucasian ? . Plus you don't know what she went through in her auditions, it's not exactly an easy road .

[The Slim Reaper]

hey Slim you missed this probably from the post just above your one..

"she's probably had people make ignorant remarks about her skin tone - race all her life."

best tell Goldie that he has no idea too?

Why? Anyone with half a brain cell can tell the difference.

[GoldHeart]

She says after 3 million pages of johnny depp v amber heard.:hee:

You can keep banging on about Johnny & Amber all you like,but the comparison will never match this .

Come back to me when Meghan & Harry have audio recordings of abuse,and evidence of dangerous toxicity with eachother. I'm talking more than the whole hand holding / pulling away clip .

[jet]

hey Slim you missed this probably from the post just above your one..

"she's probably had people make ignorant remarks about her skin tone - race all her life."

best tell Goldie that he has no idea too?

:laugh:

[jet]

She probably....

So in other words you have absolutely no idea but have landed upon the only explanation that fits in with your petty repetition?

Well she must have put mixed race on some applications because she got a mixed race part. Yes?

[GoldHeart]

Well she must have put mixed race on some applications because she got a mixed race part. Yes?

You're the one claiming she put 'caucasion' , you seem confused.

[The Slim Reaper]

Well she must have put mixed race on some applications because she got a mixed race part. Yes?

Maybe her ethnicity wasn't the reason she actually got the part? I think the first person cast as Ms Zane was a honky blond.

[The Slim Reaper]

Why? Anyone with half a brain cell can tell the difference.

:laugh:

Point proven :smug:

[GoldHeart]

Maybe her ethnicity wasn't the reason she actually got the part? I think the first person cast as Ms Zane was a honky blond.

I think some people find it hard to grasp that people are or should be cast on their merit & acting ability, rather than just how they look or what ethnicity they are.

Don't get me wrong I know it depends on the role ,but the person needs to have the skills aswell .

[jet]

You're the one claiming she put 'caucasion' , you seem confused.

Nothing confusing about it. She put Caucasion, I've seen screenshots; and as she got a mixed race part she must also have put mixed race on that, and maybe other, applications. Someone doesn't have to only do one thing or the other at all times.

[The Slim Reaper]

I think some people find it hard to grasp that people are or should be cast on their merit & acting ability, rather than just how they look or what ethnicity they are.

Don't get me wrong I know it depends on the role ,but the person needs to have the skills aswell .

I don't doubt the way she looks was probably the most important aspect of her securing that role. It's just the weird obsession of pretending everything that's ever happened in her life, is confirmation of whatever the deep thinkers project on to her and want to believe, I don't get.

[GoldHeart]

Nothing confusing about it. She put Caucasion, I've seen screenshots; and as she got a mixed race part she must also have put mixed race on that, and maybe other, applications. Someone doesn't have to only do one thing or the other at all times.

None of us know the obstacles she may have come across, both Hollywood & the music industry can be brutal. & They will pressure you to do things to get 'the role ' .

It's especially tough on women as I keep saying , especially women of colour.

[GoldHeart]

I don't doubt the way she looks was probably the most important aspect of her securing that role. It's just the weird obsession of pretending everything that's ever happened in her life, is confirmation of whatever the deep thinkers project on to her and want to believe, I don't get.

Even if her looks helped her / gave her leverage. She still will have had to go through the endless audition process to impress. Some producers & directors have zero filter , she probably got told she had to look a certain way or to change this & that .

[Beso]

You can keep banging on about Johnny & Amber all you like,but the comparison will never match this .

Come back to me when Meghan & Harry have audio recordings of abuse,and evidence of dangerous toxicity with eachother. I'm talking more than the whole hand holding / pulling away clip .

Come back to me when people are discussing those things about meghan and harry, because as yet nobody is.

Peolle are discussing her personality that she is giving out for us to watch. Thats what people are discussing.

[jet]

Do you have any idea how difficult it is for black people especially black women, in the industry. Meghan being mixed race gave her an advantage & even then it's still tough in the industry. And you're constantly stereotyped & judged on your background & race .

If you don't see the racism Meghan has experienced in the media ,then you must be turning a blind eye.
She's from LA ,yet a dumb headline was written about her as "straight out of Compton". If you can't see the racist stereotyping there then wow .

Meghan seems very proud of her black roots , she's probably had people make ignorant remarks about her skin tone - race all her life. People have different ways of dealing & coping with that .

It's not her fault of people think she can pass for Italian, some light skinned mix race people can pass for white ..but it still doesn't change who they are or where they're from.

What's interesting is when idiots make racist comments in front of them, not realising they're actually black. People show their true colours when they think they're with their own 'kind' .

What right does anyone have to tell Meghan how black she is , she is still black. Her hair & nose have zero to do with it .

Ever think she might have been pressured to change her appearance?. Even Alexandra Burke said the music industry would bully her into changing her hair & skin tone , to be more 'appealing' . It's utterly disgusting really.

Of course there was some racism in certain sections of the press, nobody is denying that. It’s not a perfect world. There is far worse racism in certain parts of the USA than there will ever be in the UK, but Meghan, according to her family and the friends she grew up with, never had a problem with racism growing up in California. She went to exclusive schools which were absolutely racially diverse with well off pupils from all over the world. Meghan would not have stood out one bit, far from it. Her neighbourhood was racially diverse. Her friends were racially diverse. Do you know anything about her life, from her own mouth and from those who she grew up with?

The point I’m making is that Meghan and the likes of her cheerleaders Shola and Omid Scobie and her admirers are using her skin colour now to divert from valid criticism of someone whose actions, presentation and motives are very polarising and questionable to say the least. She never presented herself as a ‘proud black woman’ until she could use it to her advantage. That, to me, is disgusting and an example of racism in itself.

Should a very unlikeable, bullying, lying black woman be allowed a pass that a very unlikeable, bullying, lying white woman wouldn’t get to save those who dislike her from being labelled as racist? Absolutely not, though many use that as their trump card, just like Meghan herself.

[jet]

Even if her looks helped her / gave her leverage. She still will have had to go through the endless audition process to impress. Some producers & directors have zero filter , she probably got told she had to look a certain way or to change this & that .

She probably got told nothing of the sort. If she had, we'd have heard about it all loud and clear because being the poor victim and how hard her life has been - (it wasn't, she was a pampered prima donna) is her bread and butter.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Of course there was some racism in certain sections of the press, nobody is denying that. It’s not a perfect world. There is far worse racism in certain parts of the USA than there will ever be in the UK, but Meghan, according to her family and the friends she grew up with, never had a problem with racism growing up in California. She went to exclusive schools which were absolutely racially diverse with well off pupils from all over the world. Meghan would not have stood out one bit, far from it. Her neighbourhood was racially diverse. Her friends were racially diverse. Do you know anything about her life, from her own mouth and from those who she grew up with?

The point I’m making is that Meghan and the likes of her cheerleaders Shola and Omid Scobie and her admirers are using her skin colour now to divert from valid criticism of someone whose actions, presentation and motives are very polarising and questionable to say the least. She never presented herself as a ‘proud black woman’ until she could use it to her advantage. That, to me, is disgusting and an example of racism in itself.

Should a very unlikeable, bullying, lying black woman be allowed a pass that a very unlikeable, bullying, lying white woman wouldn’t get to save those who dislike her from being labelled as racist? Absolutely not, though many use that as their trump card, just like Meghan herself.
spot on Jet

nail on head

[Swan]

See i don't get why she can't be criticised? She a public figure, just like the rest of them. You put yourself out there you are automatically open to criticism, and praise.

I absolutely agree without argument that our sensationalist press have been petty and over the top with some of their trash headlines and nit picking. People come in with this Meghan haters nonsense, at the same time they're coming in and defending her like she's the second coming or something. Her defence is even more obsessive than her criticism for the most part at this point.

Why can people just simply not like her without being branded racist either, it's so strange. If i had a top 10 list of celebs who annoy me i can almost be certain they'd all be white. Why does not liking a mixed race celebrity make you a racist?!

[Oliver_W]

Nothing confusing about it. She put Caucasion, I've seen screenshots; and as she got a mixed race part she must also have put mixed race on that, and maybe other, applications. Someone doesn't have to only do one thing or the other at all times.
The first thing a casting agent would have seen would be her headshot. If they didn't like her picture, they wouldn't have read on. It wouldn't matter how she classed herself.

Really, bickering over something as irrelevant as her akon colour is stupid.

[Crimson Dynamo]

See i don't get why she can't be criticised? She a public figure, just like the rest of them. You put yourself out there you are automatically open to criticism, and praise.

I absolutely agree without argument that our sensationalist press have been petty and over the top with some of their trash headlines and nit picking. People come in with this Meghan haters nonsense, at the same time they're coming in and defending her like she's the second coming or something. Her defence is even more obsessive than her criticism for the most part at this point.

Why can people just simply not like her without being branded racist either, it's so strange. If i had a top 10 list of celebs who annoy me i can almost be certain they'd all be white. Why does not liking a mixed race celebrity make you a racist?!

In all the markle threads and of course this one, the people who "support" her do 3 things

1. never address what she does or says
2. try and frame any criticism as "irrational hate"
3. play the race card

Regular as clockwork :joker:

[Liam-]

I wanna ask you a genuine question, im not trying to one up you, whatever you say i'll accept (i've made my anti royal views very clear on here anyway). But my question is - What do you actually like about her as a person? Like do you think she's a great Duchess and making a real difference?

I wont argue with you, we all have different opinions, but seriously, i just dont see what there is to like. Change my mind.

I don’t think I’ve ever said I like her personally, because I don’t really know enough about her to be a ‘fan’ and I don’t pretend to, unlike the people who hate her and make believe they know all aspects of her personality to try and justify just why they hate her so much.

I just see a woman who was and continues to be treated appallingly by the British media and the hordes of brainless morons who jump on the bandwagon, if you saw someone in real life you thought was being unfairly mistreated, would you say something about it or just ignore it or even join in because you think they deserved it for who they are?

I don’t see that she’s done anything wrong, or anything worthy of the unrelenting vitriol that is sent her way and I will call it out anytime I feel like it because to me, it’s wrong

[Jordan.]

Meghan Markle’s podcast Archetypes took down The Joe Rogan Experience as the top podcast on Spotify in the United States on Thursday, just two days after the Duchess of Sussex dropped the first episode of her highly-anticipated podcast.

KEY FACTS
Archetypes’ ascent ended Rogan’s reign at the top of the Spotify podcast charts, which he had held off and on for nearly three years—although his podcast has been topped before—even amid criticism over claims he was spreading misinformation on Covid-19 vaccines.

Archetypes, which Markle describes as an interview series to “dissect, explore and subvert the labels that try to hold women back,” also premiered above The Official Game of Thrones Podcast: House of the Dragon, Girls Next Level and Huberman Lab, which took the third, fourth and fifth spots in Spotify’s charts—the streaming service does not list the number of plays each podcast received.

Markle released the first episode of her podcast on Tuesday, featuring an interview with 23-time Grand Slam champion Serena Williams, who recently announced she will retire from pro tennis.

In addition to the U.S., Markle’s podcast also topped Spotify’s podcast charts in Australia, Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom.

Spotify exec's must be very happy with this success, we can look forward to more projects with Meghan in the future :clap1:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Spotify exec's must be very happy with this success, we can look forward to more projects with Meghan in the future :clap1:

disaster movies tend to get great audiences

as do car crashes

:joker:

[Jordan.]

disaster movies tend to get great audiences

as do car crashes

:joker:

That's nice. As long as Meghan stays being relevant and getting paid :hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

That's nice. As long as Meghan stays being relevant and getting paid :hee:

:joker:

https://media1.giphy.com/media/UKqZSSEgl7hDO/200w.gif?cid=82a1493bzdk8ll0lsa7g88qr5zpzb3ipnotry ezwrz5q6tl2&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

[Jordan.]

it hurtz

i get it

https://media3.giphy.com/media/hTY1mRFsHHZR7tfaMh/200w.gif?cid=82a1493bs6k23cftyes9a04mh5b0kq9oogdqh u1b9b74yg3i&rid=200w.gif&ct=g

:hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

:hee:

have you lost weight?

:clap2:

[Jordan.]

have you lost weight?

:clap2:

60 going on 16 yikes

[Jordan.]

1562834815254032384

[The Slim Reaper]

Of course there was some racism in certain sections of the press, nobody is denying that. It’s not a perfect world. There is far worse racism in certain parts of the USA than there will ever be in the UK, but Meghan, according to her family and the friends she grew up with, never had a problem with racism growing up in California. She went to exclusive schools which were absolutely racially diverse with well off pupils from all over the world. Meghan would not have stood out one bit, far from it. Her neighbourhood was racially diverse. Her friends were racially diverse. Do you know anything about her life, from her own mouth and from those who she grew up with?

The point I’m making is that Meghan and the likes of her cheerleaders Shola and Omid Scobie and her admirers are using her skin colour now to divert from valid criticism of someone whose actions, presentation and motives are very polarising and questionable to say the least. She never presented herself as a ‘proud black woman’ until she could use it to her advantage. That, to me, is disgusting and an example of racism in itself.

Should a very unlikeable, bullying, lying black woman be allowed a pass that a very unlikeable, bullying, lying white woman wouldn’t get to save those who dislike her from being labelled as racist? Absolutely not, though many use that as their trump card, just like Meghan herself.

Before I address the bit I want to, I want to make clear that I'm not calling you racist.

So the myth that minorities or PoC get away with stuff that the honkys would never be allowed to, despite centuries of historical and contemporary evidence, is inherently racist. It just is.

[Crimson Dynamo]

1562834815254032384

its sweet that them thinks anyone believes its not people watching a slow motion trainwreck

please dont say you do too??

:shocked:


omg

[The Slim Reaper]

1562834815254032384

Jet alone is probably responsible for at least one million of those listens :smug:

[Crimson Dynamo]

weak

[Oliver_W]

its sweet that them thinks anyone believes its not people watching a slow motion trainwreck

please dont say you do too??

:shocked:


omg
Sure, it's probably mostly people listening to laugh at her, or crappy "journalists" looking for headlines they can endlessly drone on about ... But it's all clicks, which counts in her favour.

You've probably given her a few extra listeners by advertising her show on here. Stop giving her the spotlight she craves, I only ever hear about her on here :joker:

[jet]

Before I address the bit I want to, I want to make clear that I'm not calling you racist.

So the myth that minorities or PoC get away with stuff that the honkys would never be allowed to, despite centuries of historical and contemporary evidence, is inherently racist. It just is.

That's a leap you are taking there. I didn't say PoC get away with stuff whites wouldn't. I was specifically referring to Meghan and her admirers using her colour as a way of berating anyone who criticises her, which they do. It's 'you don't like Meghan because she's a black woman, end of'! It's rolled out over and over again, and right here on this thread as well. Utter rubbish.

[The Slim Reaper]

That's a leap you are taking there. I didn't say PoC get away with stuff whites wouldn't. I was specifically referring to Meghan and her admirers using her colour as a way of berating anyone who criticises her, which they do. It's 'you don't like Meghan because she's a black woman, end of'! It's rolled out over and over again, and right here on this thread as well. Utter rubbish.

I tried talking in generalities so you wouldn't think you were being accused of anything. You're doing it again. I wasn't talking about anything other than the specific words you wrote in that post. Still not calling you a racist, but you're using the language of the white grievance movement.

[jet]

I tried talking in generalities so you wouldn't think you were being accused of anything. You're doing it again. I wasn't talking about anything other than the specific words you wrote in that post. Still not calling you a racist, but you're using the language of the white grievance movement.

Seems to me you use the language of the bull****ter movement. :umm2:

[Oliver_W]

I tried talking in generalities so you wouldn't think you were being accused of anything. You're doing it again. I wasn't talking about anything other than the specific words you wrote in that post. Still not calling you a racist, but you're using the language of the white grievance movement.

I think the point was meant to be that Markle's race should be irrelevant, but that's all people like "Dr" Shola can see when they look at a person, so from their racist viewpoint, that's the motivation for any criticism.

[The Slim Reaper]

I think the point was meant to be that Markle's race should be irrelevant, but that's all people like "Dr" Shola can see when they look at a person, so from their racist viewpoint, that's the motivation for any criticism.

The point I’m making is that Meghan and the likes of her cheerleaders Shola and Omid Scobie and her admirers are using her skin colour now to divert from valid criticism of someone whose actions, presentation and motives are very polarising and questionable to say the least. She never presented herself as a ‘proud black woman’ until she could use it to her advantage. That, to me, is disgusting and an example of racism in itself.


You could be right Oliver, which is why I wanted to check with him in a non accusatory manner, but the weird demand that if she wants to be a proud, black woman, then she had to inform masser jet a lot sooner, on top of the fact he assumes her skin colour is another weapon in her armoury, rather than it being who she actually is, is pretty weird you have to admit.

[bots]

i find her to be a bit like a parrot. She just regurgitates largely meaningless nonsense. There is nothing to hate about her, but I could never take her seriously and thats what she seems to crave more than anything else

[rusticgal]

i find her to be a bit like a parrot. She just regurgitates largely meaningless nonsense. There is nothing to hate about her, but I could never take her seriously and thats what she seems to crave more than anything else


Exactly. Whilst she may have had a lot of viewers they were all very much of the same mindset and reached the same conclusion....Meghan wont get what she craves.

[jet]

I think the point was meant to be that Markle's race should be irrelevant, but that's all people like "Dr" Shola can see when they look at a person, so from their racist viewpoint, that's the motivation for any criticism.

Exactly Oliver. :thumbs:

[jet]

I don’t think I’ve ever said I like her personally, because I don’t really know enough about her to be a ‘fan’ and I don’t pretend to, unlike the people who hate her and make believe they know all aspects of her personality to try and justify just why they hate her so much.

I just see a woman who was and continues to be treated appallingly by the British media and the hordes of brainless morons who jump on the bandwagon, if you saw someone in real life you thought was being unfairly mistreated, would you say something about it or just ignore it or even join in because you think they deserved it for who they are?

I don’t see that she’s done anything wrong, or anything worthy of the unrelenting vitriol that is sent her way and I will call it out anytime I feel like it because to me, it’s wrong

Well, that’s exactly why we don’t ignore Meghan’s unfair mistreatment, bullying and blatant lies about other people, not to mention her manipulations and polarising actions. We don’t ignore it, we say something.

You don’t see that she’s done anything wrong?
Before you blindly defend Meghan maybe have a look at Tom Bowers book? Her admirers won’t - because they are afraid to or can’t be bothered. Even if he got only half of it right, (which I doubt, he’s a widely acclaimed, thorough and respected biographer who has never once lost in court by the many who attempted to sue him….and Meghan, oddly enough, isn’t showing any signs of suing him, hmmm), the book still reveals a very grim picture of Meghan Markle and her treatment of and untruths about others that she considers beneath her narcissistic wonderfulness.

[Jordan.]

Well, that’s exactly why we don’t ignore Meghan’s unfair mistreatment, bullying and blatant lies about other people, not to mention her manipulations and polarising actions. We don’t ignore it, we say something.

You don’t see that she’s done anything wrong?
Before you blindly defend Meghan maybe have a look at Tom Bowers book? Her admirers won’t - because they are afraid to or can’t be bothered. Even if he got only half of it right, (which I doubt, he’s a widely acclaimed, thorough and respected biographer who has never once lost in court by the many who attempted to sue him….and Meghan, oddly enough, isn’t showing any signs of suing him, hmmm), the book still reveals a very grim picture of Meghan Markle and her treatment of and untruths about others that she considers beneath her narcissistic wonderfulness.

The same book that said she and Serena were acquaintances and not friends... and you blindly believed it :joker:

[jet]

You could be right Oliver, which is why I wanted to check with him in a non accusatory manner, but the weird demand that if she wants to be a proud, black woman, then she had to inform masser jet a lot sooner, on top of the fact he assumes her skin colour is another weapon in her armoury, rather than it being who she actually is, is pretty weird you have to admit.

I ‘demanded’ no such thing, either in words or implication, so from now on I will have no time for you and your OTT s**t stirring melodramatics.
Anything I said are the thoughts of members of her own family and friends who she grew up with and who seem to be looking on askance at the person who was rather different before finding some fame in Suits.

[Beso]

I hate her as a person, like helen wood or marco sabas.for me, like them, there is no redemption.

[Beso]

Markle windsor davies the turd,would stab her own toe nails off if it gained her ears what they yearn for..


Thank **** she aint built like spock or her fa hather in law.

[jet]

The same book that said she and Serena were acquaintances and not friends... and you blindly believed it :joker:

Sorry to bring your laughter to an end, but that is wrong.

Bower was recounting what Kashner claimed. Here is the quote from the book:

Over the next few days, he (Kashner) said he called those who Meghan recommended as her friends. Serena Williams denied she was Meghan’s friend but just an acquaintance.
She gave him an enigmatic quote: You’ve got to be who you are, Meghan, you can’t hide’.

On the contrary, Bower goes on to talk about Meghan going to see Serena playing tennis and how Serena paid for her NY baby shower. So he was aware they were friends. Puzzled about what Kasher had told him, he asked for clarification from Serena who neither confirmed nor denied what Kasher had said, but simply responded with ‘no comment’.

And no, I obviously didn't 'blindly believe it', you made that up. :nono:

[Mystic Mock]

I tried talking in generalities so you wouldn't think you were being accused of anything. You're doing it again. I wasn't talking about anything other than the specific words you wrote in that post. Still not calling you a racist, but you're using the language of the white grievance movement.

From my point of view I am not some black rights activist that supports every little complaint that they make, in fact some of it can sometimes be tiresome imo.

However I honestly do not understand what Meghan has done so wrong? Especially when it's to the point where thread after thread is made about how horrible she is.

I don't intend to offend anyone with what I'm saying, but I've honestly not heard any justifiable reason why Meghan is so hated.

And imo this is hatred, it's basically a witch hunt at this point, which I'll never support regardless of if it's about racism or not.

And in terms of history Slim, I'd say that you're correct in that black people have definitely faced more racism than white people, or any other race if we're being honest.

However I do believe that any group can be racist or face racism before the right wingers come for me.:joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

From my point of view I am not some black rights activist that supports every little complaint that they make, in fact some of it can sometimes be tiresome imo.

However I honestly do not understand what Meghan has done so wrong? Especially when it's to the point where thread after thread is made about how horrible she is.

I don't intend to offend anyone with what I'm saying, but I've honestly not heard any justifiable reason why Meghan is so hated.

And imo this is hatred, it's basically a witch hunt at this point, which I'll never support regardless of if it's about racism or not.

And in terms of history Slim, I'd say that you're correct in that black people have definitely faced more racism than white people, or any other race if we're being honest.

However I do believe that any group can be racist or face racism before the right wingers come for me.:joker:

more racism than Jews?

[Jordan.]

From my point of view I am not some black rights activist that supports every little complaint that they make, in fact some of it can sometimes be tiresome imo.

However I honestly do not understand what Meghan has done so wrong? Especially when it's to the point where thread after thread is made about how horrible she is.

I don't intend to offend anyone with what I'm saying, but I've honestly not heard any justifiable reason why Meghan is so hated.

And imo this is hatred, it's basically a witch hunt at this point, which I'll never support regardless of if it's about racism or not.

And in terms of history Slim, I'd say that you're correct in that black people have definitely faced more racism than white people, or any other race if we're being honest.

However I do believe that any group can be racist or face racism before the right wingers come for me.:joker:

Spot on Mock, a witch hunt is exactly what it is. They pretend they don't care about her, have no interest in what she has to say, wish she'd go away etc all that nonsense yet still actively pursue her career to attack her. They are mad now about a podcast they have zero obligation to even listen to... and then they wonder why people question their motive.

[Kazanne]

I'm not fussed about her either way, but it does make me smile when those defending her get personal and try and belittle anyone who doesn't like her, I would say it's fanatical when people defend to the hilt someone they don't know when the topic comes from the horse's mouth, I don't care what she does or says, but the defense of her is a bit cringy and amusing imo.

[Beso]

Yes LT, I also believe the jews have had it worse.

[rusticgal]

Meghan was hugely popular when she married Harry....her popularity dropped significantly when she went on National Television telling numerous lies and discrediting the Royal Family. Her selfish self absorbed character has constantly shone through in everything she does....the most telling thing to me was when she went to Africa to highlight the atrocities that young women endured and then made the whole thing about poor mememe...
Everything she does is about her...all over exaggerated to get maximum effect....poor poor Meghan...she wants nothing to do with the Royal Family but holds on to her title to make herself important.

She is famous all over the world (albeit mainly for the wrong reasons)...she says she is trying to reach out to people with a message hence the Podcasts. She could make herself more relatable if she dropped the title and stopped making everything about her.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I'm not fussed about her either way, but it does make me smile when those defending her get personal and try and belittle anyone who doesn't like her, I would say it's fanatical when people defend to the hilt someone they don't know when the topic comes from the horse's mouth, I don't care what she does or says, but the defense of her is a bit cringy and amusing imo.

Have you noticed Kaz how hard it is to defend her now?

Its a real struggle :hehe:

[bots]

Meghan is being criticised therefore it must be racism seems to be the default defence

[rusticgal]

Meghan is being criticised therefore it must be racism seems to be the default defence


Yes...her behaviour and actions are irrelevant...:laugh:

[GoldHeart]

I'm not fussed about her either way, but it does make me smile when those defending her get personal and try and belittle anyone who doesn't like her, I would say it's fanatical when people defend to the hilt someone they don't know when the topic comes from the horse's mouth, I don't care what she does or says, but the defense of her is a bit cringy and amusing imo.

But not everyone likes Meghan as a fan ,they just don't understand the hatred .

Spot on Mock, a witch hunt is exactly what it is. They pretend they don't care about her, have no interest in what she has to say, wish she'd go away etc all that nonsense yet still actively pursue her career to attack her. They are mad now about a podcast they have zero obligation to even listen to... and then they wonder why people question their motive.

:clap1:

Yes LT, I also believe the jews have had it worse.


Is this a competition now , didn't realise the suffering of both Jewish people & the Black community was being put to the test for a prize.

[rusticgal]

But not everyone likes Meghan as a fan ,they just don't understand the hatred .






It is not 'hatred' as you call it...its simply negative opinion on what she says and does.
You do seem to be a bit hypocritical because when someone's behaviour gets your back up you don't hold back from expressing that on this Forum,,,it really is no different.

[GoldHeart]

It is not 'hatred' as you call it...its simply negative opinion on what she says and does.
You do seem to be a bit hypocritical because when someone's behaviour gets your back up you don't hold back from expressing that on this Forum,,,it really is no different.

It's not hypocrisy

I don't know why you keep comparing when I dislike someone, it's not the same thing.

Plus I move on ,I don't keep moaning about the person I dislike over & over again like some broken record.

[Mystic Mock]

more racism than Jews?

Admittedly that would be a close one.:joker:

One of the most is what I should've said.

[Mystic Mock]

Spot on Mock, a witch hunt is exactly what it is. They pretend they don't care about her, have no interest in what she has to say, wish she'd go away etc all that nonsense yet still actively pursue her career to attack her. They are mad now about a podcast they have zero obligation to even listen to... and then they wonder why people question their motive.

Exactly this.

Because personally speaking if I don't like someone in Showbiz I only discuss them at rare intervals.

[Mystic Mock]

I'm not fussed about her either way, but it does make me smile when those defending her get personal and try and belittle anyone who doesn't like her, I would say it's fanatical when people defend to the hilt someone they don't know when the topic comes from the horse's mouth, I don't care what she does or says, but the defense of her is a bit cringy and amusing imo.

Hello Kazanne, how have you been doing?

Back on topic, I am only sticking up for Meghan because she's having some people ripping her apart for anything that she does, which imo is an unhealthy attitude to have towards anyone.

And I'm gonna guess that a lot of her defenders are feeling the same as me.

[GoldHeart]

Exactly this.

Because personally speaking if I don't like someone in Showbiz I only discuss them at rare intervals.

This is what I don't understand
The obsession with her every move , like I said I didn't even know about the podcast until I saw this thread.

[rusticgal]

This is what I don't understand
The obsession with her every move , like I said I didn't even know about the podcast until I saw this thread.


It’s not obsession over her every move….she has just produced a Podcast which is being discussed…stop with the exaggeration ffs.

[Crimson Dynamo]

This is what I don't understand
The obsession with her every move , like I said I didn't even know about the podcast until I saw this thread.

It was reported and reviewed in every newspaper and featured on every news channel

so im afraid your sample size of one only suggests you dont keep abreast of the news

[rusticgal]

It was reported and reviewed in every newspaper and featured on every news channel

so im afraid your sample size of one only suggests you dont keep abreast of the news


Exactly LT…

[Jordan.]

It’s not obsession over her every move….she has just produced a Podcast which is being discussed…stop with the exaggeration ffs.

Where? :conf:

[Jordan.]

I hate her as a person

It is not 'hatred'

:joker:

[The Slim Reaper]

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GrouchySlipperyAlligatorsnappingturtle-size_restricted.gif

[Crimson Dynamo]

sample size one rather illustrates the reaching

and to cheerlead it too

oh dear

:skull:

[rusticgal]

Where? :conf:

From page one…until you and yours come on here and divert the discussion to the usual ‘bullying’ ‘hatred’ and ‘Racist’ agenda :hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

"Archie, then four months old, was not in the room in Cape Town when a heater started to
smoke - but the incident left the Duchess of Sussex 'shaken' and 'in tears', she told tennis
star Serena Williams in her new podcast."

NO fire
child not in room when a heater started to smoke


LIES
LIES
LIES

what a nasty nasty fantasist

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11151757/South-Africans-hit-Meghan-Markle-told-fire-Archies-room.html

[Jordan.]

From page one…until you and yours come on here and divert the discussion to the usual ‘bullying’ ‘hatred’ and ‘Racist’ agenda :hee:

Your only post on page one "embarrassing". Such food for thought, HOW did the conversation not blossom???

[Jordan.]

"Archie, then four months old, was not in the room in Cape Town when a heater started to
smoke - but the incident left the Duchess of Sussex 'shaken' and 'in tears', she told tennis
star Serena Williams in her new podcast."

NO fire
child not in room when a heater started to smoke


LIES
LIES
LIES

what a nasty nasty fantasist

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11151757/South-Africans-hit-Meghan-Markle-told-fire-Archies-room.html

She never said he was in the room at the time :conf: those that listened to the podcast would know this isn't news.

[Crimson Dynamo]

She never said he was in the room at the time :conf: those that listened to the podcast would know this isn't news.

Fire?

[Jordan.]

Fire?

She was recounting what she was told 2nd hand and how it panicked her as a parent. Maybe listen to the podcast to avoid further confusion?

[Crimson Dynamo]

She was recounting what she was told over the phone. Maybe listen to the podcast to avoid further confusion?

as a good mum she asked questions right?


and as a good mum she would not use her child to have a dig at her inlaws

to some fake pal for financial gain

right?


f me

do i have to type this??

:bored:

[jet]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11148709/Prince-Harry-slammed-phone-William-heated-call-Meghan-Markle-bullying-claims.html
Aug 26th
Claims are made in a new documentary series by popular French news channel

Prince Harry 'slammed the phone down' on Prince William after being confronted with witness statements portraying Meghan Markle as a vicious bully of female staff, a new French documentary claims.
In turn, William – 'who already didn't like his sister-in-law very much' – became so angry at his brother's insistence on protecting his wife from criticism that he jumped in a car 'towards Kensington Palace to go and confront Prince Harry'.
The explosive claims are contained in a documentary by the most popular TV news outlet in France.

BFM TV displays emails - disclosed as part of the Duchess of Sussex's privacy claim against the Mail on Sunday - in an investigative documentary series called 'Red Line: William and Harry, the enemy brothers'.
It claims that traumatised staff resigned from the Royal Household and set up a WhatsApp group called 'The Sussex Survivors' Club'.

The series firmly blames 'The behaviour of Meghan for being at the heart of the break-up between William and Harry.'
It says the Duchess of Sussex, 41, used her position in the Royal Family to bully and intimidate staff while living in Kensington Palace, with Harry, 37……etc.

[Jordan.]

Who is excited for next week's podcast with MARIAH CAREY??

H1Yt0xJKDY8

[Jordan.]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11148709/Prince-Harry-slammed-phone-William-heated-call-Meghan-Markle-bullying-claims.html
Aug 26th
Claims are made in a new documentary series by popular French news channel

Prince Harry 'slammed the phone down' on Prince William after being confronted with witness statements portraying Meghan Markle as a vicious bully of female staff, a new French documentary claims.
In turn, William – 'who already didn't like his sister-in-law very much' – became so angry at his brother's insistence on protecting his wife from criticism that he jumped in a car 'towards Kensington Palace to go and confront Prince Harry'.
The explosive claims are contained in a documentary by the most popular TV news outlet in France.

BFM TV displays emails - disclosed as part of the Duchess of Sussex's privacy claim against the Mail on Sunday - in an investigative documentary series called 'Red Line: William and Harry, the enemy brothers'.
It claims that traumatised staff resigned from the Royal Household and set up a WhatsApp group called 'The Sussex Survivors' Club'.

The series firmly blames 'The behaviour of Meghan for being at the heart of the break-up between William and Harry.'
It says the Duchess of Sussex, 41, used her position in the Royal Family to bully and intimidate staff while living in Kensington Palace, with Harry, 37……etc.

This isn't relevant to Meghan's #1 podcast.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Who is excited for next week's podcast with MARIAH CAREY??

H1Yt0xJKDY8

people who listened to the first

ie not you

:joker:

[Jordan.]

people who listened to the first

ie not you

:joker:

OK :pat:

[Crimson Dynamo]

we all know

[Jordan.]

Who is excited for next week's podcast with MARIAH CAREY??

H1Yt0xJKDY8

.

[jet]

Who is excited for next week's podcast with MARIAH CAREY??

H1Yt0xJKDY8

People who admire bullies?

[Cherie]

So apart from the ‘fire’ that left everyone on the SA tour shaken and in tears :joker: what other snippets you got for us from the podcast...question for the fanboys

[GoldHeart]

It was reported and reviewed in every newspaper and featured on every news channel

so im afraid your sample size of one only suggests you dont keep abreast of the news

So because I didn't know what Meghan was up to ,it means I don't keep up to date with the news? Sure ok:hee: .

I don't really read the newspapers, I saw something pop up on Google about Meghan ... I assume about the podcast but I didn't read it .

[Cherie]

Hold up wasn’t there a 2.4 million refurb of Frogmore Cottage before they moved in....surely they upgraded the central heating system, why would they need some dusty electric heater in the nursery :suspect:

[Jordan.]

So because I didn't know what Meghan was up to ,it means I don't keep up to date with the news? Sure ok:hee: .

I don't really read the newspapers, I saw something pop up on Google about Meghan ... I assume about the podcast but I didn't read it .

I didn't know about it until this thread was posted either Goldie. Sitting reading the daily mail website day in day out isn't a hobby for some of us. I'm sure I would have seen it on Spotify eventually when it flew up the charts.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I didn't know about it until this thread was posted either Goldie. Sitting reading the daily mail website day in day out isn't a hobby for some of us. I'm sure I would have seen it on Spotify eventually when it flew up the charts.

but you still listened to the Podcast...

:joker:

what utter bollox

[James]

I going to close this now.