Montecito Harry's Un awaited book is to be called Spare

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1585611754368745472?s=20&t=kZJtQKy2i8u3RC6onlr4WA

[arista]

This
is on the other thread.
King Charles


It is being Edited
they want to sell millions
of his new book

[Crimson Dynamo]

This
is on the other thread.
King Charles


It is being Edited
they want to sell millions
of his new book

This is not about our King

Its about a man in LA being used by a Publisher to make them money

[arista]

This is not about our King

Its about a man in LA being used by a Publisher to make them money


Of Course LT
but he is connected to our King.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Of Course LT
but he is connected to our King.

Yes King Charles knew Harry's father I believe...

https://i2-prod.devonlive.com/incoming/article1585624.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/harry-hewitt.png

[hijaxers]

Well Harry what an uncreative title, may have well as called it Tit , suits better.

[jet]

SPARE. :laugh:
It’s £28 a copy to hear ‘Harry’s truth’. It’ll be all over the media anyway for free. If it’s anything like Meghan’s ‘truth’ it will be a load of codswallop.

Apparently he’s taken some bits out, following the Queen’s death, which is why it’s been delayed. He obviously didn’t care about the alive Queen’s reaction to it, but after the shock of seeing how popular the Monarchy are with how the public reacted to the Queen's death, he's running scared, poor thing.

[Cherie]

Spare 😂

[Glenn.]

I’m sure you’ll all let everyone know what’s inside

[jet]

They have departed company with their publicity team, Sunshine Sachs, who were hired to further their ambitions as a ‘dynamic duo’; the alternative and more popular Royals in the USA and make them loadsa money. After many headaches and getting back the millions the dynamic duo owed them, Sunshine Sachs are breathing a sigh of relief.

Now for the damage control. Their new team is pushing them as wholesome, regular Joe’s, misrepresented and misunderstood. Meghan, in her recent interview, said of their Netflix docuseries that the producers may not present it the way she and Harry would, distancing herself already, :laugh: and Harry has been begging for parts of his book to be axed, but the publishers may not have agreed with everything he wanted.
It will be the producers and the publishers fault if H&M’s own words and actions aren't well received, naturally. :laugh:

[Beso]

Urgh, hes such an odious prick...sick of the bloody sight of him.

Wonder if he talks about his closeness to uncle andrew..

[bots]

let me think .... £28 for the book or £28 toward the weekly shop ..... tough choice :think:

[Crimson Dynamo]

I mean just the cover :yuk: they have airbrushed under his eyes and it makes the image look fake and the only way is essex

who can look at that pic and say - yes that is a good one for the cover

barmy :huh:

[Jordan.]

I’m sure you’ll all let everyone know what’s inside

This

"Un awaited" (sic)

:joker:

[Beso]

let me think .... £28 for the book or £28 toward the weekly shop ..... tough choice :think:



Expensive bog roll.

[bots]

I mean just the cover :yuk: they have airbrushed under his eyes and it makes the image look fake and the only way is essex

who can look at that pic and say - yes that is a good one for the cover

barmy :huh:

they have given his face a strange texture too, it's pretty weird :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Could the title be any more bitter?

Him and his awful wife must have spent a whole afternoon sucking lemons before coming up with that

:laugh2:

[Glenn.]

Urgh, hes such an odious prick...sick of the bloody sight of him.

Wonder if he talks about his closeness to uncle andrew..

It always amuses me when people say this :joker:

Can’t stand them but obsessively talk about them at the first opportunity. If you can’t stand them stop talking about them :joker:

[Liam-]

An actual first hand view and experience of his life rather than those from bitter journalists and extended family? Sounds like a good thing to set the record straight, good on Haz

[Cherie]

The title pretty much confirms how narked he is at being the spare, thought he wanted out of all things Royal :hehe:

[Beso]

It always amuses me when people say this :joker:

Can’t stand them but obsessively talk about them at the first opportunity. If you can’t stand them stop talking about them :joker:

I cant stand dog ****e, but sometimes it sticks to my shoes.

[bots]

he could be considered meghans spare cheque book, maybe thats what he means

[rusticgal]

I mean, wouldn’t you be a bit narked if you were bred purely to be the understudy of your older sibling? I mean, the media has spent his entire life calling him the spare to the heir, it’s bound to take a toll on a person


He used to tease William about not having the responsibilities that William was going to have….he needs to make up his mind :laugh:

[rusticgal]

What a self pitying title….he has gone from Spare to Sidekick. Will that be the title of a future book??

[Glenn.]

It’s amazing how triggered y’all are :joker:

[arista]

SPARE. :laugh:
It’s £28 a copy to hear ‘Harry’s truth’. It’ll be all over the media anyway for free. If it’s anything like Meghan’s ‘truth’ it will be a load of codswallop.

Apparently he’s taken some bits out, following the Queen’s death, which is why it’s been delayed. He obviously didn’t care about the alive Queen’s reaction to it, but after the shock of seeing how popular the Monarchy are with how the public reacted to the Queen's death, he's running scared, poor thing.



Yes well Over Priced


Harry Got the 15Million Dollars

Only the Proceeds go to Charity

[smudgie]

Had an email from hmv that you can preorder for £14.

[rusticgal]

Yes well Over Priced


Harry Got the 15Million Dollars

Only the Proceeds go to Charity


What next?….there is little left to spill.

[rusticgal]

If ANYONE is interested :laugh:….the book has already been reduced to 14.99 from WHSmiths…

[Mystic Mock]

Personally if you don't want to see what he has to say then don't read it.

Why read a Book you're not interested in? Or don't like the Author in general?

[Mystic Mock]

SPARE. :laugh:
It’s £28 a copy to hear ‘Harry’s truth’. It’ll be all over the media anyway for free. If it’s anything like Meghan’s ‘truth’ it will be a load of codswallop.

Apparently he’s taken some bits out, following the Queen’s death, which is why it’s been delayed. He obviously didn’t care about the alive Queen’s reaction to it, but after the shock of seeing how popular the Monarchy are with how the public reacted to the Queen's death, he's running scared, poor thing.

Horrible title, I agree.

Tbf he might've put in some negative stuff about Elizabeth in the Book that might be seen as in poor taste given that she's only just passed away.

[Jordan.]

Had an email from hmv that you can preorder for £14.

Amazing news. I'll now buy 2 and donate one to the local library :love:

[thesheriff443]

Amazing news. I'll now buy 2 and donate one to the local library :love:

Why?
Have they got a wobbly table

[jet]

If ANYONE is interested :laugh:….the book has already been reduced to 14.99 from WHSmiths…

....and Waterstones...and comes with a free sickbag. :hehe:

[Jordan.]

Why?
Have they got a wobbly table

The only wobbles come from the fanatic mob :hehe:

[jet]

Horrible title, I agree.

Tbf he might've put in some negative stuff about Elizabeth in the Book that might be seen as in poor taste given that she's only just passed away.

But he wouldn't mind a frail old lady, his own grandmother, actually reading negative stuff he said about her?
He and Meghan trashed the institution the Queen had given her life to while her husband was on his deathbed.
No Mock, imo he's only worried about how himself and his ghastly wife will be perceived.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-43c20f62-9060-4425-9d66-4868ec6a209e.jpeg

[Mystic Mock]

But he wouldn't mind a frail old lady, his own grandmother, actually reading negative stuff he said about her?
He and Meghan trashed the institution the Queen had given her life to while her husband was on his deathbed.
No Mock, imo he's only worried about how himself and his ghastly wife will be perceived.

Well I don't know his relationship with some of his other family members, maybe he doesn't care about offending them.

But we all know that he had a good relationship with Elizabeth, he weren't gonna trash her in public when she's dead.

[Jordan.]

Well I don't know his relationship with some of his other family members, maybe he doesn't care about offending them.

But we all know that he had a good relationship with Elizabeth, he weren't gonna trash her in public when she's dead.

Exactly Mock, he's never once said a bad word personally about his granny and he isn't going to now she has passed either. It was always a false narrative used by those sickening enough to use a dying elderly lady to point score.

[Jordan.]

The same people pretending to care so much about the frail old lady have no issue with the PM who lied and partied whilst she had to sit alone at her husbands funeral.

[arista]

The same people pretending to care so much about the frail old lady have no issue with the PM who lied and partied whilst she had to sit alone at her husbands funeral.


You do talk rubbish

Johnson MP
does not like Parties.

[Beso]

Watching the pride of Britain awards last night it made me think how different things could have been for these 2..they could have been up for awards, or eagerly anticipated guests giving out an award..but no, their selfish arrogance got he better of them.

[rusticgal]

Personally I don't understand what the Royals are worried about....these two are proven liars. Anything he says will be taken with a pinch of salt...:shrug:

[bots]

i won £30 on the lottery, i can afford the book now :amazed:

[The Slim Reaper]

We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet :laugh:

[Glenn.]

:hehe:

[Crimson Dynamo]

We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet :laugh:

two posters have already tried that attempt

might have been 3

[The Slim Reaper]

two posters have already tried that attempt

might have been 3

Not attempting anything my perpetually disinterested brother. If it wasn't true, you wouldn't feel the need to try and object.

[Crimson Dynamo]

"Spare is a landmark publication full of insight, revelation, self-examination,
and hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief."

https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/1222206481_emoji2.png

[jet]

Exactly Mock, he's never once said a bad word personally about his granny and he isn't going to now she has passed either. It was always a false narrative used by those sickening enough to use a dying elderly lady to point score.

Nobody ever said he directly said a bad word about the Queen.

As has been posted before on several occasions, the Queen’s dresser told Katie Nicholl that Harry leaving the family in the way he did and his behaviour afterwards left his grandmother hurt and exhausted.
Moreover, given her age and frailty, and with time running out to do so, he and Meghan declined her invitation to visit her at Balmoral in the summer and again didn’t express a desire to visit when they were in the UK days before she died.
It is perfectly natural to be very annoyed and disgusted at the pair of them. Why aren’t you?

[The Slim Reaper]

The queens dresser :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

The queens dresser :joker:

or an excellent source

[Jordan.]

The queens dresser :joker:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4e/39/eb/4e39eb0ce06395667710fb9a906ce1a7.gif

[jet]

https://pagesix.com/2022/10/13/prince-harry-meghan-markle-netflix-show-contradicts-memoir/

Harry & Meghan ‘contradict’ their own stories in his tell-all, Netflix docuseries

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s docu-series will debut on Netflix in early December, multiple sources told Page Six — but there are still lots of conflicts.
Sources said Netflix and the series’ filmmakers were confused by some of the comments that Harry makes in his upcoming book being at odds with what he and his wife said on camera.

“A lot in the show contradicted what Harry has written, so that was an issue,” a senior Netflix source revealed.

“Then Harry and Meghan made significant requests [to filmmakers] to walk back content they themselves have provided, for their own project,” the source added.
—-------------
That’s what happens when you don’t tell the truth. You forget what story you peddled on your last pity party.
The book should have a disclaimer attached like The Crown is now doing, so that the gullible won’t think it’s all real.

[The Slim Reaper]

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4e/39/eb/4e39eb0ce06395667710fb9a906ce1a7.gif



https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f8/2d/c1/f82dc1f90d68a7f328920b298a010aaa.gif

https://y.yarn.co/33e4de54-8e97-4441-8445-0d0a61211d8a_text.gif

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://pagesix.com/2022/10/13/prince-harry-meghan-markle-netflix-show-contradicts-memoir/

Harry & Meghan ‘contradict’ their own stories in his tell-all, Netflix docuseries

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s docu-series will debut on Netflix in early December, multiple sources told Page Six — but there are still lots of conflicts.
Sources said Netflix and the series’ filmmakers were confused by some of the comments that Harry makes in his upcoming book being at odds with what he and his wife said on camera.

“A lot in the show contradicted what Harry has written, so that was an issue,” a senior Netflix source revealed.

“Then Harry and Meghan made significant requests [to filmmakers] to walk back content they themselves have provided, for their own project,” the source added.
—-------------
That’s what happens when you don’t tell the truth. You forget what story you peddled on your last pity party.
The book should have a disclaimer attached like The Crown is now doing, so that the gullible won’t think it’s all real.


They cant even remember their own lies

:facepalm:

[Glenn.]

The book should have a disclaimer attached like The Crown is now doing, so that the gullible won’t think it’s all real.

It’s a pity you don’t follow your own advice when it comes to tabloids :joker: :joker: :joker:

[jet]

They cant even remember their own lies

:facepalm:

The entertainment they bring us is priceless. :joker:

[Liam-]

The bitterness over a man telling his side of the story in his own words and using his own experiences

[jet]

Harry in a 2020 speech to rich bankers JP Morgan.
“I was in therapy for 7 years to to help me deal with my mothers death”.
He said it was William who encouraged him to get it.

Harry last week at the Masters of Scale summit for BetterUp.
“In the Royal family I never heard the word therapy.” It wasn’t until I met Meghan and she encouraged me to get it….

Meghan in a recent podcast:
“I remember at my worst point, (when she said she was suicidal) being finally connected to someone that my husband had found, a referral for me to call.”

Harry on Oprah, when asked what he had done to help Meghan when she was suicidal said
“I didn’t help her, I was too embarrassed to ask for help”.


Confused? You should be. So is Netflix. :laugh:

[Jordan.]

It’s a pity you don’t follow your own advice when it comes to tabloids :joker: :joker: :joker:

:joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Harry in a 2020 speech to rich bankers JP Morgan.
“I was in therapy for 7 years to to help me deal with my mothers death”.
He said it was William who encouraged him to get it.

Harry last week at the Masters of Scale summit for BetterUp.
“In the Royal family I never heard the word therapy.” It wasn’t until I met Meghan and she encouraged me to get it….

Meghan in a recent podcast:
“I remember at my worst point, (when she said she was suicidal) being finally connected to someone that my husband had found, a referral for me to call.”

Harry on Oprah, when asked what he had done to help Meghan when she was suicidal said
“I didn’t help her, I was too embarrassed to ask for help”.


Confused? You should be. So is Netflix. :laugh:

Hoisted by their own petard

[Jordan.]

The bitterness over a man telling his side of the story in his own words and using his own experiences

Some people have convinced themselves through the lack of their own life's that they know someone else's inside out.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The title of the book has sparked reactions from royal commentators.

Angela Levin, royal biographer, suggested the title is a "resentful" Harry
"trying to get his own back" for the cruel jibe separating him from brother
and future monarch William.

She said: "Spare, the title of Harry's book is desperately sad. Is that what he
still thinks of himself? After all the therapy, a wife he worships and freedom
he longed for, he is still full of resentment and out to get his own back. You
can see it in his eyes on the cover."

Journalist Meghan McCain wrote: "I’m not as plugged into this as Brits are
clearly - but the title seems like a troll… Is this your take?"

Another journalist Rupert Myers commented: “Is this the real cover and title?
Good grief.”

“The book is supposed to be about a journey to love and healing but
the title speaks about bitterness and jealousy,” Verdad penned.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/448964-prince-harry-worships-his-wife-meghan-markle

Going down a storm and not even out yet...https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/popcorn.gif

[Beso]

Chapter 7.

Uncle Andrew, my saviour.

[rusticgal]

i won £30 on the lottery, i can afford the book now :amazed:


You can afford to buy 2...its already half price :laugh:

[rusticgal]

We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet :laugh:


Not interested in what???

[Crimson Dynamo]

You can afford to buy 2...its already half price :laugh:

on its way to its final destination...

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/b8/51/b1/b851b1975bd97baf4f9e6726d5ad9840--stacked-books-table-legs.jpg

[rusticgal]

Harry in a 2020 speech to rich bankers JP Morgan.
“I was in therapy for 7 years to to help me deal with my mothers death”.
He said it was William who encouraged him to get it.

Harry last week at the Masters of Scale summit for BetterUp.
“In the Royal family I never heard the word therapy.” It wasn’t until I met Meghan and she encouraged me to get it….

Meghan in a recent podcast:
“I remember at my worst point, (when she said she was suicidal) being finally connected to someone that my husband had found, a referral for me to call.”

Harry on Oprah, when asked what he had done to help Meghan when she was suicidal said
“I didn’t help her, I was too embarrassed to ask for help”.


Confused? You should be. So is Netflix. :laugh:


:joker::joker::joker:

[rusticgal]

on its way to its final destination...

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/b8/51/b1/b851b1975bd97baf4f9e6726d5ad9840--stacked-books-table-legs.jpg


:joker:

[Jordan.]

on its way to its final destination...

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/b8/51/b1/b851b1975bd97baf4f9e6726d5ad9840--stacked-books-table-legs.jpg

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own :joker:

[rusticgal]

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own :joker:



Well its a good one...thanks for sharing LT :wavey:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own :joker:

Not with a good image

this makes it 60% funnier and also targets new members to today's post like slim

https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/alfie.png

[jet]

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own :joker:

Do you ever have any thoughts on H&M and the thread topics instead of repetitive one - liners about other posters?

[The Slim Reaper]

repetitive :laugh:

[Swan]

repetitive :laugh:

Genuine question though, don't you think Harry is a bit of a knob? I just think people should be allowed to criticise them. They do come out with a load of entitled, pompous bollocks at times.

[thesheriff443]

Genuine question though, don't you think Harry is a bit of a knob? I just think people should be allowed to criticise them. They do come out with a load of entitled, pompous bollocks at times.

Hello swan, the truth is he and others don’t give a flying fcuk about harry or Meghan there only interested in mocking other members and trying to get the threads closed

[Glenn.]

Hello swan, the truth is he and others don’t give a flying fcuk about harry or Meghan there only interested in mocking other members and trying to get the threads closed

This coming from posters who profess to never give a **** about Harry and Meghan…

[jet]

Here is the PR spiel for the book:

It was one of the most searing images of the twentieth century: two young boys, two princes, walking behind their mother's coffin as the world watched in sorrow and horror. As Diana, Princess of Wales, was laid to rest, billions wondered what the princes must be thinking and feeling-and how their lives would play out from that point on.

For Harry, this is that story at last. With its raw, unflinching honesty, Spare is a landmark publication full of insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief.
----------------------
The author who ghost wrote Harry’s book will have had his work cut out for him trying to portray Harry as honest, insightful and wise…but he is a Pulitzer prize winner so there is that…:hee:

[Zizu]

Genuine question though, don't you think Harry is a bit of a knob? I just think people should be allowed to criticise them. They do come out with a load of entitled, pompous bollocks at times.


It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi

[Crimson Dynamo]

Here is the PR spiel for the book:

It was one of the most searing images of the twentieth century: two young boys, two princes, walking behind their mother's coffin as the world watched in sorrow and horror. As Diana, Princess of Wales, was laid to rest, billions wondered what the princes must be thinking and feeling-and how their lives would play out from that point on.

For Harry, this is that story at last. With its raw, unflinching honesty, Spare is a landmark publication full of insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief.
----------------------
The author who ghost wrote Harry’s book will have had his work cut out for him trying to portray Harry as honest, insightful and wise…but he is a Pulitzer prize winner so there is that…:hee:


using his dead mother to sell books...https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/ang.png

[Zizu]

using his dead mother to sell books...https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/ang.png


You want him to erase her from his past ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Jordan.]

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi

:clap1:

[The Slim Reaper]

Genuine question though, don't you think Harry is a bit of a knob? I just think people should be allowed to criticise them. They do come out with a load of entitled, pompous bollocks at times.

You know my opinions on royalty, they're all knobs. I'm not trying to get the threads closed as MohammedI'mardBruceLee443 claims. Posters are forever crying in threads about me posting rather than contributing with anything.

Of course people are allowed to criticise them, but let me ask you a question in return; What is being said in this thread that hasn't been said in the 43983948739867396986398994846938496938673986964963 87498763984673967948739864796873906093096803946037 69387687309609386590387659386-987985795685795875698657935879 previous threads?

What do you learn from these threads?

[Crimson Dynamo]

You want him to erase her from his past ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

no just stop trying to make money out of her

[The Slim Reaper]

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi

Fair play zeez. You absolutely baffle me when it comes to other topics (Boris mainly :laugh: ), but you've absolutely nailed it here.

[Zizu]

Fair play zeez. You absolutely baffle me when it comes to other topics (Boris mainly :laugh: ), but you've absolutely nailed it here.


Thank you .. I think

:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1585972750153228288?s=20&t=F-5ulVbhNGv5geIED6-ZLQ

[Swan]

You know my opinions on royalty, they're all knobs. I'm not trying to get the threads closed as MohammedI'mardBruceLee443 claims. Posters are forever crying in threads about me posting rather than contributing with anything.

Of course people are allowed to criticise them, but let me ask you a question in return; What is being said in this thread that hasn't been said in the 43983948739867396986398994846938496938673986964963 87498763984673967948739864796873906093096803946037 69387687309609386590387659386-987985795685795875698657935879 previous threads?

What do you learn from these threads?

Yeah it's been said many times before, i guess from a logical standpoint it's annoying for regular people struggling with everyday life, then you have these 2 whining and preaching about this and that. Often non issues, or issues most other people haven't got room in their heads to worry about as putting food on the table isn't always a guarantee.

They have wealth, and status in life that 99.9% of people will never duplicate, and can only ever dream of. Instead of enjoying it, all they do is complain about it. It's annoying.

I do agree with the "if you stop talking about them they will go away" theory, but it's difficult when they're all over the media. It's kinda like Trump now, people still talk about him in unhealthy doses. But then he is current i guess, whether you like him or not. And for better or worse, so are Harry and Meghan.

[bots]

the thing is, now the queen has gone, no-one gives a flying **** what he says about the other royals. That's the truth of the matter. Obsessed twats like Piers Morgan will always blow hot air, but the bottom line is ..... no one gives a damn

[jet]

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi

It's been over 2 years since the world and its auntie loved Harry. The sad thing is, he HAS changed, enormously. His family, former friends and army mates are worried about him. He has cut himself off from almost all of them.
Denying the change in him without doing research to find out what most people see won't change that fact.

[Cherie]

Why?
Have they got a wobbly table

:joker::joker::joker:

[Cherie]

They cant even remember their own lies

:facepalm:

that is the problem with liars, a good memory is required

[rusticgal]

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi



He changed when he threw his family under the bus...accusing them of financially cutting him off and accused them of Racism...all very distasteful.

As for Charles and Camilla they have turned public opinion around and people in general like them. Andrew is a different story altogether...but this post is about Harry.

[jet]

I'll never get why people open threads they have no interest in, and only come in to complain about other people posting in them. :huh:

[The Slim Reaper]

Yeah it's been said many times before, i guess from a logical standpoint it's annoying for regular people struggling with everyday life, then you have these 2 whining and preaching about this and that. Often non issues, or issues most other people haven't got room in their heads to worry about as putting food on the table isn't always a guarantee.

They have wealth, and status in life that 99.9% of people will never duplicate, and can only ever dream of. Instead of enjoying it, all they do is complain about it. It's annoying.

I do agree with the "if you stop talking about them they will go away" theory, but it's difficult when they're all over the media. It's kinda like Trump now, people still talk about him in unhealthy doses. But then he is current i guess, whether you like him or not. And for better or worse, so are Harry and Meghan.

I don't ever come across them in my daily life. The only place I see them is on here, so I disagree about them whining when folks are just trying to get through their days. In fact, if you're struggling at the moment, then these threads are more of a detriment than the actual lives these threads discuss.

We don't know how they spend their lives or whether they are generally happy. We see the fact M has a podcast, we see H talking about his wife being suicidal, then we have 15 pages of the forum deciding they are the worst people in the world. Rinse and repeat ad nauseum.

The difference with Trump, is that he is actually important for how the world will develop over the next decade. There is a good chance we won't have a democratic America from January 2025. If Meghan doesn't release a podcast, or H doesn't attend the Invictus games, then that's NBD.

[jet]

the thing is, now the queen has gone, no-one gives a flying **** what he says about the other royals. That's the truth of the matter. Obsessed twats like Piers Morgan will always blow hot air, but the bottom line is ..... no one gives a damn

Harry and his book is on every news channel, and most of the daily papers. They are running out of Royal reporters to interview. :laugh:

[Zizu]

the thing is, now the queen has gone, no-one gives a flying **** what he says about the other royals. That's the truth of the matter. Obsessed twats like Piers Morgan will always blow hot air, but the bottom line is ..... no one gives a damn


Exactly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/Pooja33719735/status/1585904824109109249?s=20&t=9Jak8x-pskbQk-b-Pn4Lgg

[Zizu]

Harry and his book is on every news channel, and most of the daily papers. They are running out of Royal reporters to interview. :laugh:


Things go full circle . Harry will soon be THE most popular Royal and they will be begging him to return


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1585709856257884167?s=20&t=9Jak8x-pskbQk-b-Pn4Lgg

:joker:

[jet]

Things go full circle . Harry will soon be THE most popular Royal and they will be begging him to return


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Are you sure you're not confusing Harry with Boris? :laugh:

[Jordan.]

Things go full circle . Harry will soon be THE most popular Royal and they will be begging him to return


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Well he's already the most relevant. Not many aside from the 50+ bootlicker care about the rest of the dull family.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Well he's already the most relevant. Not many aside from the 50+ bootlicker care about the rest of the dull family.

did you miss the Queen's funeral?



i mean really :joker:

[Mystic Mock]

Personally I don't understand what the Royals are worried about....these two are proven liars. Anything he says will be taken with a pinch of salt...:shrug:

Tbf nobody wants to have their behaviour being scrutinised in public.

[Mystic Mock]

"Spare is a landmark publication full of insight, revelation, self-examination,
and hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief."

https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/1222206481_emoji2.png

Gerrard has become the whipping boy of jokes the poor bastard.:joker:

[rusticgal]

Things go full circle . Harry will soon be THE most popular Royal and they will be begging him to return


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


In your dreams....whilst William, Kate and their family are around they dont stand a chance.


...but dream on

[Beso]

Hello swan, the truth is he and others don’t give a flying fcuk about harry or Meghan there only interested in mocking other members and trying to get the threads closed

Keeps the forum alive though.:smug:

[Mystic Mock]

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi

Andrew is popular? Tbh that's not that surprising, I mean we are talking about people in 2022.

[Beso]

did you miss the Queen's funeral?



i mean really :joker:

Jordan cant answer that....you got him LT. You got him good.:hehe:

[thesheriff443]

Keeps the forum alive though.:smug:

The forum doesn’t need trolls to live on
It’s been proven by those that have already left.

[Zizu]

In your dreams....whilst William, Kate and their family are around they dont stand a chance.


...but dream on


Well only if ‘those’ rumours about William are unfounded ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Andrew is popular? Tbh that's not that surprising, I mean we are talking about people in 2022.


Popular was prob a tad overstepping things as regards him


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Beso]

The forum doesn’t need trolls to live on
It’s been proven by those that have already left.

It's nice to give it a good watering now and again though eh.:blush:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Well only if ‘those’ rumours about William are unfounded ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

they dont exist

malicious gossip by people who should know better does sadly..

[Jordan.]

did you miss the Queen's funeral?



i mean really :joker:

We're talking about the present? There's no question the queen was loved by many, the rest of the family are not.

[The Slim Reaper]

The forum doesn’t need trolls to live on
It’s been proven by those that have already left.

The forum doesn't need sesame street gangsters either :blush:

[rusticgal]

Well only if ‘those’ rumours about William are unfounded ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Well they are unfounded….I hadn’t even heard of them until I read comments on here…clearly a load of rubbish. William and Kate are extremely popular…rumours and all…

[The Slim Reaper]

I hadn’t even heard of them until I read comments on here…clearly a load of rubbish.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6f/62/ac/6f62acce8a7448a4abee3a3f6ae06796.gif

[Crimson Dynamo]

The fact that Kate and William are so loved and popular is the real reason behind Harry and his wifes anger

its plain jealousy

[thesheriff443]

The forum doesn't need sesame street gangsters either :blush:

T
Your the biggest muppet on here.

[jet]

The fact that Kate and William are so loved and popular is the real reason behind Harry and his wifes anger

its plain jealousy

That's exactly what it's all about. Plain and simple. The pathetic title of his book is a big clue.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Your the biggest muppet on here.

:joker:

[rusticgal]

That's exactly what it's all about. Plain and simple. The pathetic title of his book is a big clue.



The title speaks volumes of his bitterness and jealousy..

[The Slim Reaper]

T
Your the biggest muppet on here.

Aren't you the same dude who said this?

Hello swan, the truth is he and others don’t give a flying fcuk about harry or Meghan there only interested in mocking other members and trying to get the threads closed


Well then big lad, maybe you need to spend less time worrying about my posts, and start getting wound up by your own posts? You've spent all day obsessing over me in this thread.

Quickest way to get threads closed is actually insulting other members, something only one of us has done, you precious little thing :blush:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Aren't you the same dude who said this?




Well then big lad, maybe you need to spend less time worrying about my posts, and start getting wound up by your own posts? You've spent all day obsessing over me in this thread.

Quickest way to get threads closed is actually insulting other members, something only one of us has done, you precious little thing :blush:

wrong Jordan has had posts removed for insulting members

[thesheriff443]

Aren't you the same dude who said this?




Well then big lad, maybe you need to spend less time worrying about my posts, and start getting wound up by your own posts? You've spent all day obsessing over me in this thread.

Quickest way to get threads closed is actually insulting other members, something only one of us has done, you precious little thing :blush:

No one gives a fcuk about you, your in a thread trying to be clever and failing as always.

You ain’t got the balls to come out and say what you actually think like a real man.

A key board warrior like so many.

[The Slim Reaper]

No one gives a fcuk about you, your in a thread trying to be clever and failing as always.

You ain’t got the balls to come out and say what you actually think like a real man.

A key board warrior like so many.

You seem to definitely give AF about me :laugh:

A real man that talked to parm and swan about me, not to me, in this very thread? That kind of real man? A real big scary man? The kind of man that acts like a hardman? A real, real, real man? Like I said - sesame street gangster.

You're right, the problem with me has always been that people don't know what I really think about them :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

You seem to definitely give AF about me :laugh:

A real man that talked to parm and swan about me, not to me, in this very thread? That kind of real man? A real big scary man? The kind of man that acts like a hardman? A real, real, real man? Like I said - sesame street gangster.

You're right, the problem with me has always been that people don't know what I really think about them :joker:
you need to free yourself from the whole Sherrif obsession?

[thesheriff443]

you need to free yourself from the whole Sherrif obsession?

With a forum now so small it’s not going unnoticed

[Crimson Dynamo]

With a forum now so small it’s not going unnoticed

its alarming

[The Slim Reaper]

2 real men who turn into southern belles whenever I post. You love to see it :smug:

[Beso]

Hes got you there LT and sherriff.:joker:

[Mystic Mock]

The forum doesn’t need trolls to live on
It’s been proven by those that have already left.

Tbf I think it's just two sides of a debate strongly disagreeing with each other.

I think it's a good thing for the Forum to not be an echo chamber.

[Mystic Mock]

Popular was prob a tad overstepping things as regards him


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I hope that's true.

I scarily think that he is more popular than Meghan, Harry & possibly Charles though.

[Zizu]

I hope that's true.

I scarily think that he is more popular than Meghan, Harry & possibly Charles though.


… that in itself is madness


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[thesheriff443]

Tbf I think it's just two sides of a debate strongly disagreeing with each other.

I think it's a good thing for the Forum to not be an echo chamber.

Its not mock
You have members that knock Meghan and harry for being liars and full of self pity and then you have four members knocking members for knocking those two twats.

You are a nice guy mock but people use your kindness to peddle their crap

[jet]

Tbf I think it's just two sides of a debate strongly disagreeing with each other.

I think it's a good thing for the Forum to not be an echo chamber.

There is no strong debate.
Those of us who don’t like H&M explain why, or post items to back up our thinking. Time after time, the same people come in and offer nothing in the way of giving reasons why they disagree, they just use one liners to mock and insult posters. Whatever happened to the rule ‘talk about the topic, not other posters’.

Here are examples of those one liners from this thread - and there were more along the same lines which were removed:


Can’t stand them but obsessively talk about them at the first opportunity. If you can’t stand them stop talking about them

I’m sure you’ll all let everyone know what’s inside

It’s amazing how triggered y’all are

The only wobbles come from the fanatic mob

We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet

It’s a pity you don’t follow your own advice when it comes to tabloids

Some people have convinced themselves through the lack of their own life's that they know someone else's inside out.

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own
……………………
Where is the debate? Where are the posts in favour of H&M from these usual suspects to balance out the negative views? They are rare. Eventually, the thread descents into chaos, and is closed. They do it time after time.

[Mystic Mock]

Its not mock
You have members that knock Meghan and harry for being liars and full of self pity and then you have four members knocking members for knocking those two twats.

You are a nice guy mock but people use your kindness to peddle their crap

Thanks for the compliment.:blush:

Personally I don't understand the full on dislike of H&M, but it's good to hear why other people do.

Honest advice I can give to people that don't like H&M is to focus on Celebrities that you do like, I've fallen into a similar trap myself with Cheryl Cole years ago, and I ended up driving myself crazy.

I honestly don't mean it as an attack.

[Mystic Mock]

There is no strong debate.
Those of us who don’t like H&M explain why, or post items to back up our thinking. Time after time, the same people come in and offer nothing in the way of giving reasons why they disagree, they just use one liners to mock and insult posters. Whatever happened to the rule ‘talk about the topic, not other posters’.

Here are examples of those one liners from this thread - and there were more along the same lines which were removed:


Can’t stand them but obsessively talk about them at the first opportunity. If you can’t stand them stop talking about them

I’m sure you’ll all let everyone know what’s inside

It’s amazing how triggered y’all are

The only wobbles come from the fanatic mob

We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet

It’s a pity you don’t follow your own advice when it comes to tabloids

Some people have convinced themselves through the lack of their own life's that they know someone else's inside out.

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own
……………………
Where is the debate? Where are the posts in favour of H&M from these usual suspects to balance out the negative views? They are rare. Eventually, the thread descents into chaos, and is closed. They do it time after time.

Unfortunately some debates do get very heated at the moment, Harry & Meghan is one of them.

I like to think though that overall both sides have well intended arguments, even if it can get a bit out of hand sometimes.

[jet]

I like to think though that overall both sides have well intended arguments, even if it can get a bit out of hand sometimes.

I can't agree Mock. Perhaps you could give me the post numbers on this thread of what you consider to be well intended arguments/good debate/positive opinions about H&M from those who like them so I can understand where you are coming from? :shrug:

[Mystic Mock]

I can't agree Mock. Perhaps you could give me the post numbers on this thread of what you consider to be well intended arguments/good debate/positive opinions about H&M from those who like them so I can understand where you are coming from? :shrug:

Well Liam's post on page 1 talking about how it'll be good to hear his side of the story rather than the Media possibly twisting things isn't attacking a member imo.

Jordan's post of buying 2 so he could send 1 to the Library isn't attacking any members as far as I can tell anyway.

Admittedly this thread has probably gotten quite fiery since then from both sides tbf.

[jet]

Well Liam's post on page 1 talking about how it'll be good to hear his side of the story rather than the Media possibly twisting things isn't attacking a member imo.

Jordan's post of buying 2 so he could send 1 to the Library isn't attacking any members as far as I can tell anyway.

Admittedly this thread has probably gotten quite fiery since then from both sides tbf.

Liam isn't usually one of the 'usual' suspects I was referring to....and my point was that none of those I was referring to ever offer actual debate or reasoned arguments but instead mainly resort to personal insults to other posters starting from the first page in the thread- as proven by the list I gave you. That a few weren't attacks is irrelevant.
It's blatantly obvious Mock, but if you don't want to take sides, then fair enough. :)

[Glenn.]

There have been many many many threads about Harry and Meghan over the last few years. People gave up with reasoned debate because quite frankly there’s no need for debate. You can’t debate irrational hatred.

[Crimson Dynamo]

There have been many many many threads about Harry and Meghan over the last few years. People gave up with reasoned debate because quite frankly there’s no need for debate. You can’t debate irrational hatred.

so old

:bored:

[Glenn.]

so old

:bored:

Wow what wonderful insight and great addition to the “debate”

[thesheriff443]

There have been many many many threads about Harry and Meghan over the last few years. People gave up with reasoned debate because quite frankly there’s no need for debate. You can’t debate irrational hatred.

And yet here you are saying the same sh1t years later
You said you have no interest in the people being talked about
You said you have no interest in the people talking in the thread

If people want to talk about Meghan and harry on this forum that’s their choice not yours.

Your only interested in coming in the threads having digs at members because you are a sad old he bitch .

[Glenn.]

And yet here you are saying the same sh1t years later
You said you have no interest in the people being talked about
You said you have no interest in the people talking in the thread

If people want to talk about Meghan and harry on this forum that’s their choice not yours.

Your only interested in coming in the threads having digs at members because you are a sad old he bitch .

And yet your input in the thread is about what other posters post. The very thing you’re moaning about :joker:

[Jordan.]

There have been many many many threads about Harry and Meghan over the last few years. People gave up with reasoned debate because quite frankly there’s no need for debate. You can’t debate irrational hatred.

:clap1:

[thesheriff443]

And yet your input in the thread is about what other posters post. The very thing you’re moaning about :joker:

If you weren’t in the thread talking sh1t I wouldn’t have keep addressing your embarrassing lemon sucking posts

[The Slim Reaper]

Liam isn't usually one of the 'usual' suspects I was referring to....and my point was that none of those I was referring to ever offer actual debate or reasoned arguments but instead mainly resort to personal insults to other posters starting from the first page in the thread- as proven by the list I gave you. That a few weren't attacks is irrelevant.
It's blatantly obvious Mock, but if you don't want to take sides, then fair enough. :)

Meanwhile, the levels of debate or reasoned argument:

Well Harry what an uncreative title, may have well as called it Tit , suits better.

SPARE. :laugh:
It’s £28 a copy to hear ‘Harry’s truth’. It’ll be all over the media anyway for free. If it’s anything like Meghan’s ‘truth’ it will be a load of codswallop.

Apparently he’s taken some bits out, following the Queen’s death, which is why it’s been delayed. He obviously didn’t care about the alive Queen’s reaction to it, but after the shock of seeing how popular the Monarchy are with how the public reacted to the Queen's death, he's running scared, poor thing.


Urgh, hes such an odious prick...sick of the bloody sight of him.

Wonder if he talks about his closeness to uncle andrew..

I mean just the cover :yuk: they have airbrushed under his eyes and it makes the image look fake and the only way is essex

who can look at that pic and say - yes that is a good one for the cover

barmy :huh:



What a self pitying title….he has gone from Spare to Sidekick. Will that be the title of a future book??

Why?
Have they got a wobbly table

I don't know if you seriously think that this is an intellectual debate that's being had, and maybe it was at the beginning, but these are just joke threads these days, and that's not because of any mythical "4 posters", but because of what your side is offering.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Wow what wonderful insight and great addition to the “debate”

All you have in every post is to bleat about haters

you add nothing but anger and bitterness

try adding actual content:shrug:

[The Slim Reaper]

If you weren’t in the thread talking sh1t I wouldn’t have keep addressing your embarrassing lemon sucking posts

Again dude, you're the only person in this thread throwing insults around. On a smaller forum, it isn't going unnoticed :smug:

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1585611754368745472?s=20&t=kZJtQKy2i8u3RC6onlr4WA

SPARE. :laugh:
It’s £28 a copy to hear ‘Harry’s truth’. It’ll be all over the media anyway for free. If it’s anything like Meghan’s ‘truth’ it will be a load of codswallop.

Apparently he’s taken some bits out, following the Queen’s death, which is why it’s been delayed. He obviously didn’t care about the alive Queen’s reaction to it, but after the shock of seeing how popular the Monarchy are with how the public reacted to the Queen's death, he's running scared, poor thing.

They have departed company with their publicity team, Sunshine Sachs, who were hired to further their ambitions as a ‘dynamic duo’; the alternative and more popular Royals in the USA and make them loadsa money. After many headaches and getting back the millions the dynamic duo owed them, Sunshine Sachs are breathing a sigh of relief.

Now for the damage control. Their new team is pushing them as wholesome, regular Joe’s, misrepresented and misunderstood. Meghan, in her recent interview, said of their Netflix docuseries that the producers may not present it the way she and Harry would, distancing herself already, :laugh: and Harry has been begging for parts of his book to be axed, but the publishers may not have agreed with everything he wanted.
It will be the producers and the publishers fault if H&M’s own words and actions aren't well received, naturally. :laugh:

The title pretty much confirms how narked he is at being the spare, thought he wanted out of all things Royal :hehe:

He used to tease William about not having the responsibilities that William was going to have….he needs to make up his mind :laugh:

Yes well Over Priced


Harry Got the 15Million Dollars

Only the Proceeds go to Charity

Had an email from hmv that you can preorder for £14.

Horrible title, I agree.

Tbf he might've put in some negative stuff about Elizabeth in the Book that might be seen as in poor taste given that she's only just passed away.

But he wouldn't mind a frail old lady, his own grandmother, actually reading negative stuff he said about her?
He and Meghan trashed the institution the Queen had given her life to while her husband was on his deathbed.
No Mock, imo he's only worried about how himself and his ghastly wife will be perceived.

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-43c20f62-9060-4425-9d66-4868ec6a209e.jpeg

Well I don't know his relationship with some of his other family members, maybe he doesn't care about offending them.

But we all know that he had a good relationship with Elizabeth, he weren't gonna trash her in public when she's dead.

https://pagesix.com/2022/10/13/prince-harry-meghan-markle-netflix-show-contradicts-memoir/

Harry & Meghan ‘contradict’ their own stories in his tell-all, Netflix docuseries

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s docu-series will debut on Netflix in early December, multiple sources told Page Six — but there are still lots of conflicts.
Sources said Netflix and the series’ filmmakers were confused by some of the comments that Harry makes in his upcoming book being at odds with what he and his wife said on camera.

“A lot in the show contradicted what Harry has written, so that was an issue,” a senior Netflix source revealed.

“Then Harry and Meghan made significant requests [to filmmakers] to walk back content they themselves have provided, for their own project,” the source added.
—-------------
That’s what happens when you don’t tell the truth. You forget what story you peddled on your last pity party.
The book should have a disclaimer attached like The Crown is now doing, so that the gullible won’t think it’s all real.

Harry in a 2020 speech to rich bankers JP Morgan.
“I was in therapy for 7 years to to help me deal with my mothers death”.
He said it was William who encouraged him to get it.

Harry last week at the Masters of Scale summit for BetterUp.
“In the Royal family I never heard the word therapy.” It wasn’t until I met Meghan and she encouraged me to get it….

Meghan in a recent podcast:
“I remember at my worst point, (when she said she was suicidal) being finally connected to someone that my husband had found, a referral for me to call.”

Harry on Oprah, when asked what he had done to help Meghan when she was suicidal said
“I didn’t help her, I was too embarrassed to ask for help”.


Confused? You should be. So is Netflix. :laugh:

Hoisted by their own petard

The title of the book has sparked reactions from royal commentators.

Angela Levin, royal biographer, suggested the title is a "resentful" Harry
"trying to get his own back" for the cruel jibe separating him from brother
and future monarch William.

She said: "Spare, the title of Harry's book is desperately sad. Is that what he
still thinks of himself? After all the therapy, a wife he worships and freedom
he longed for, he is still full of resentment and out to get his own back. You
can see it in his eyes on the cover."

Journalist Meghan McCain wrote: "I’m not as plugged into this as Brits are
clearly - but the title seems like a troll… Is this your take?"

Another journalist Rupert Myers commented: “Is this the real cover and title?
Good grief.”

“The book is supposed to be about a journey to love and healing but
the title speaks about bitterness and jealousy,” Verdad penned.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/448964-prince-harry-worships-his-wife-meghan-markle

Going down a storm and not even out yet...https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/popcorn.gif

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

All that has happened is that everyone has been programmed by the media into believing he is now the son of the devil whilst the real ‘unpleasant’ people like Andrew , Charles and Chlamydia are suddenly appealing and popular .

I bet Di is squirming in her grave as we speak


Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi

https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/1585972750153228288?s=20&t=F-5ulVbhNGv5geIED6-ZLQ

Yeah it's been said many times before, i guess from a logical standpoint it's annoying for regular people struggling with everyday life, then you have these 2 whining and preaching about this and that. Often non issues, or issues most other people haven't got room in their heads to worry about as putting food on the table isn't always a guarantee.

They have wealth, and status in life that 99.9% of people will never duplicate, and can only ever dream of. Instead of enjoying it, all they do is complain about it. It's annoying.

I do agree with the "if you stop talking about them they will go away" theory, but it's difficult when they're all over the media. It's kinda like Trump now, people still talk about him in unhealthy doses. But then he is current i guess, whether you like him or not. And for better or worse, so are Harry and Meghan.

the thing is, now the queen has gone, no-one gives a flying **** what he says about the other royals. That's the truth of the matter. Obsessed twats like Piers Morgan will always blow hot air, but the bottom line is ..... no one gives a damn

It's been over 2 years since the world and its auntie loved Harry. The sad thing is, he HAS changed, enormously. His family, former friends and army mates are worried about him. He has cut himself off from almost all of them.
Denying the change in him without doing research to find out what most people see won't change that fact.

https://twitter.com/Pooja33719735/status/1585904824109109249?s=20&t=9Jak8x-pskbQk-b-Pn4Lgg

https://twitter.com/danwootton/status/1585709856257884167?s=20&t=9Jak8x-pskbQk-b-Pn4Lgg

:joker:

Tbf nobody wants to have their behaviour being scrutinised in public.

The fact that Kate and William are so loved and popular is the real reason behind Harry and his wifes anger

its plain jealousy

There is no strong debate.
Those of us who don’t like H&M explain why, or post items to back up our thinking. Time after time, the same people come in and offer nothing in the way of giving reasons why they disagree, they just use one liners to mock and insult posters. Whatever happened to the rule ‘talk about the topic, not other posters’.

Here are examples of those one liners from this thread - and there were more along the same lines which were removed:


Can’t stand them but obsessively talk about them at the first opportunity. If you can’t stand them stop talking about them

I’m sure you’ll all let everyone know what’s inside

It’s amazing how triggered y’all are

The only wobbles come from the fanatic mob

We're not interested in this, claim the most interested group of people on the planet

It’s a pity you don’t follow your own advice when it comes to tabloids

Some people have convinced themselves through the lack of their own life's that they know someone else's inside out.

Someone already made this joke yesterday. Do you ever have a thought that's your own
……………………
Where is the debate? Where are the posts in favour of H&M from these usual suspects to balance out the negative views? They are rare. Eventually, the thread descents into chaos, and is closed. They do it time after time.

Thanks for the compliment.:blush:

Personally I don't understand the full on dislike of H&M, but it's good to hear why other people do.

Honest advice I can give to people that don't like H&M is to focus on Celebrities that you do like, I've fallen into a similar trap myself with Cheryl Cole years ago, and I ended up driving myself crazy.

I honestly don't mean it as an attack.

Meanwhile, the levels of debate or reasoned argument:
I don't know if you seriously think that this is an intellectual debate that's being had, and maybe it was at the beginning, but these are just joke threads these days, and that's not because of any mythical "4 posters", but because of what your side is offering.

actual content above your post

and look who are missing...

[rusticgal]

Thanks for the compliment.:blush:

Personally I don't understand the full on dislike of H&M, but it's good to hear why other people do.

Honest advice I can give to people that don't like H&M is to focus on Celebrities that you do like, I've fallen into a similar trap myself with Cheryl Cole years ago, and I ended up driving myself crazy.

I honestly don't mean it as an attack.


It would also be nice to hear why people DO like them....but we never do :laugh:

[Beso]

actual content above your post

and look who are missing...

You missed my pride of britain post.

[jet]

actual content above your post

and look who are missing...

Well said, LT.

There is plenty of scope for people to give their opposing opinions, or at least say why they LIKE H&M, as Rusti pointed out.
H&M threads get many viewers. They are in Serious Debates and NEWS. H&M often put themselves in the NEWS. Harry’s book is NEWS.

As I said before, I’ll never understand why posters who say they have no interest open a thread only to tell other posters why they shouldn’t be posting in them. Not to post about the thread topic, but to mock and get personal with those who are interested and try to derail threads.

Someone who doesn’t dislike H&M is Annie K, who gives her own opinion and opposing views respectfully. A rarity. An example of how it is done.

[Beso]

I don't know if you seriously think that this is an intellectual debate that's being had, and maybe it was at the beginning, but these are just joke threads these days, and that's not because of any mythical "4 posters", but because of what your side is offering.




It's a news story, I cant see whats to debate about it so what you are saying is pointless.:shrug:

[Zizu]

It’s not that long ago that the world and it’s auntie absolutely LOVED Harry and even forgave his little idiosyncrasies … he can’t have changed that much ..

Bewildering stuff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Proi


I still like Harry .. plus you can’t knock him for falling in love with a gorgeous woman - he’s only human


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[rusticgal]

I still like Harry .. plus you can’t knock him for falling in love with a gorgeous woman - he’s only human


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


What do you like about him?

[The Slim Reaper]

Well said, LT.

There is plenty of scope for people to give their opposing opinions, or at least say why they LIKE H&M, as Rusti pointed out.
H&M threads get many viewers. They are in Serious Debates and NEWS. H&M often put themselves in the NEWS. Harry’s book is NEWS.

As I said before, I’ll never understand why posters who say they have no interest open a thread only to tell other posters why they shouldn’t be posting in them. Not to post about the thread topic, but to mock and get personal with those who are interested and try to derail threads.

Someone who doesn’t dislike H&M is Annie K, who gives her own opinion and opposing views respectfully. A rarity. An example of how it is done.

There are lots of threads we all wish would have gone differently. Folks have been pointing out for years about how a certain poster has no interest in contributing to any threads other than trolling, and the forum powers weren't interested so I have no idea why you think these threads are a protected class now.

You're patting a dude on the back who brought trans people into practically every thread last night, for no reason other than to try and get a reaction, so instead of acting high and mighty, maybe realise that this is all this place is these days. I haven't insulted anyone (despite being insulted), and I haven't broken any forum rules, so maybe you all need to stop crying, post your own posts, and stop turning into Scarlett O'Hara every time someone who isn't one of your favourites, posts in the same threads as you.

There is no rule on Tibb that you can't put someone on ignore, or just ignore what someone you don't like says. It's really easy.

[jet]

There is no rule on Tibb that you can't put someone on ignore, or just ignore what someone you don't like says. It's really easy.

Right back at ya….and not only can you ignore people - you can ignore threads too. Unlike you, I don’t go into threads I have no interest in or no desire to get involved in just to tell posters who are interested that they shouldn’t be and insult them by childish name calling - like Southern Belles and Scarlett O’Hara's.
Grow up.
...and by the way, I would welcome debate from people who 'aren't my favourites' as you put it. I think of those people as 'thinking differently to the way I do' - that is what debate is all about. Sarky one liners aimed at posters to try and rile them, and ignoring the topic, kill debate.

[Beso]

It is also against the rules to take threads off topic.

[jet]

It is also against the rules to take threads off topic.

:wavey:

It used to be. Unfortunately it appears not to be enforced anymore.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Right back at ya….and not only can you ignore people - you can ignore threads too. Unlike you, I don’t go into threads I have no interest in or no desire to get involved in just to tell posters who are interested that they shouldn’t be and insult them by childish name calling - like Southern Belles and Scarlett O’Hara's.
Grow up.
...and by the way, I would welcome debate from people who 'aren't my favourites' as you put it. I think of those people as 'thinking differently to the way I do' - that is what debate is all about. Sarky one liners aimed at posters to try and rile them, and ignoring the topic, kill debate.

:clap1:

well said Jet

[jet]

You're patting a dude on the back who brought trans people into practically every thread last night, for no reason other than to try and get a reaction, so instead of acting high and mighty, maybe realise that this is all this place is these days.

I responded positively to LT in THIS thread. I don't follow him or anyone else around to see what they have posted elsewhere before I can agree with them on a different thread.
Heavens above. :bored:

[thesheriff443]

Right back at ya….and not only can you ignore people - you can ignore threads too. Unlike you, I don’t go into threads I have no interest in or no desire to get involved in just to tell posters who are interested that they shouldn’t be and insult them by childish name calling - like Southern Belles and Scarlett O’Hara's.
Grow up.
...and by the way, I would welcome debate from people who 'aren't my favourites' as you put it. I think of those people as 'thinking differently to the way I do' - that is what debate is all about. Sarky one liners aimed at posters to try and rile them, and ignoring the topic, kill debate.

Well said jet.

[The Slim Reaper]

Right back at ya….and not only can you ignore people - you can ignore threads too. Unlike you, I don’t go into threads I have no interest in or no desire to get involved in just to tell posters who are interested that they shouldn’t be and insult them by childish name calling - like Southern Belles and Scarlett O’Hara's.
Grow up.
...and by the way, I would welcome debate from people who 'aren't my favourites' as you put it. I think of those people as 'thinking differently to the way I do' - that is what debate is all about. Sarky one liners aimed at posters to try and rile them, and ignoring the topic, kill debate.


Welcome debate on what? Every single one of these threads has been exactly the same, with exactly the same type of comments

Again, the rules have been laid pretty clearly over the last couple of years by the powers that be in relation to what is allowed on here, so from my pov, there is nothing wrong with following them, which is all I do. I post where I like, about what I like, and when I like. The problem isn't mine to get over. As soon as the forum allowed others to have no interest in posting their own comments or contributing in any way in other SD threads, then the rules were set. I'm sorry if you don't like that, but you only see it when it's posters you don't like and ignore it when it comes from those that want to tell you how good your posts are.

Why am I posting sarky one liners, and yet it's crickets when others you like are actually throwing actual insults around? Please report anything you think is an insult of mine in here, because then mods/admin will read back though and see exactly what happened.


All you had to do was carry on posting your posts, but you couldn't, and now this thread is on it's way to being closed again, too, which is probably the aim, so the same group of you can cry about other posters again.

Seriously, post where you want about what you want, and who cares where others post?

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/shadesofgreaves/status/1585676464355254272?s=20&t=3pIHL_sQPVRHZKkzay6cSA

[Cherie]

https://twitter.com/shadesofgreaves/status/1585676464355254272?s=20&t=3pIHL_sQPVRHZKkzay6cSA

What is a 40oz and is this a real excerpt because it sounds like parody

[Crimson Dynamo]

What is a 40oz and is this a real excerpt because it sounds like parody

:nono: Bowling is an artform

[hijaxers]

What is a 40oz and is this a real excerpt because it sounds like parody

Well if it is from his book he'll be a laughing stock ~ i doubt it is though.

[Swan]

What is a 40oz and is this a real excerpt because it sounds like parody

40oz is a big bottle of beer. Known to be drunk mostly in "hoods"

And yes, it's parody.

[Crimson Dynamo]

he likes to bowl and drink

i wish you haterz would cut him some slack??

[Crimson Dynamo]

irrational

[jet]

Welcome debate on what? Every single one of these threads has been exactly the same, with exactly the same type of comments


It makes no sense to me why you carry on reading them then, but that's up to you.
As for the rest of your post - I honestly don't understand half of it and what I do understand I don't agree with.

Now I'm going to go back to the thread topic, the news about Harry and his book. :wavey:

[Crimson Dynamo]

It makes no sense to me why you carry on reading them then, but that's up to you.
As for the rest of your post - I honestly don't understand half of it and what I do understand I don't agree with.

Now I'm going to go back to the thread topic, the news about Harry and his book. :wavey:

dont rise to any comments that dont add to the thread Jet

not worth it

[jet]

https://twitter.com/shadesofgreaves/status/1585676464355254272?s=20&t=3pIHL_sQPVRHZKkzay6cSA

:joker: Parody on the bowling term a 'Spare' I guess.

[Crimson Dynamo]

:joker: Parody on the bowling term a 'Spare' I guess.

beautiful

:joker:

[jet]

dont rise to any comments that dont add to the thread Jet

not worth it

Yeah, back to the topic :thumbs: