Prince William has released a statement about the claims in Harry's book.

[user104658]

---

[arista]

I am sure they can talk about this.


No need to have it out in the press

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-7499565a-67bc-4c2b-9c97-74e7e8aa57d3.png

[Oliver_W]

A source close to the Royal has revealed that William has taken time to consider his position, and has said the following;

"Unfortunately, Harold is just jealous of me 'cause he... he just can't do what I do. So instead of just admitting it, he walks around and says all kinds of really mean things about me. Because he is a meanie. A meanie. But it's only because he's just really jealous of me, cause I'm what he wants to be, so he just looks like an idiot when he says these mean things, 'cause it's too easy to see he's really just a big todger. A big todger."

The press has reached out to Harry for comment.

Amusing. But fair? No.

Prince Wills has hardly been petulant, he's been "the grown-up", as is.

[Cherie]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-7499565a-67bc-4c2b-9c97-74e7e8aa57d3.png

Ouch....

[thesheriff443]

We all know what big Willy would do if he was in soldier boys kitchen!

That’s right he’d ask for a glass of water:joker:

[Swan]

A source close to the Royal has revealed that William has taken time to consider his position, and has said the following;

"Unfortunately, Harold is just jealous of me 'cause he... he just can't do what I do. So instead of just admitting it, he walks around and says all kinds of really mean things about me. Because he is a meanie. A meanie. But it's only because he's just really jealous of me, cause I'm what he wants to be, so he just looks like an idiot when he says these mean things, 'cause it's too easy to see he's really just a big todger. A big todger."

The press has reached out to Harry for comment.

Harry wont comment to the press yet, only when he needs them to promote the book he writes about William's comments. :hee:

The sequel to Spare, Pear.

[Cherie]

For someone who hates these threads SB ....?

[user104658]

Amusing. But fair? No.

Prince Wills has hardly been petulant, he's been "the grown-up", as is.

Kate making nasty underhand jibes about therapy suggests that it's not the same behind the scenes :hehe:.

[user104658]

For someone who hates these threads SB ....?

Hates what threads?

[Cherie]

Hates what threads?

Maybe I am confusing you with someone else

[Cherie]

The stark contrast between Big Willy and Kate visiting a hospital to thank staff and Harold doing the rounds of the TV studios to promote himself is far more valuable than any statement :hehe:

[rusticgal]

The stark contrast between Big Willy and Kate visiting a hospital to thank staff and Harold doing the rounds of the TV studios to promote himself is far more valuable than any statement :hehe:


It speaks volumes...

[bots]

in fairness willie has just been handed a giant wad of cash that dwarfs anything that harold could earn in a lifetime so they can smile a lot and open hospitals without a care in the world :laugh:

[jet]

Kate making nasty underhand jibes about therapy suggests that it's not the same behind the scenes :hehe:.

The desperate reaching. Context, SB, context. :nono:

During the visit, Kate asked: “Has producing music and taking part in those workshops helped? Has it helped with your personal lives?”
One young person replied that using music as a tool helped him express his emotions.

He said: “Producing music and letting out what you’re feeling is better than saying it in a clinical atmosphere.”
According to The Sun, Kate replied: “Talking therapies don’t work for some people, they’re not for everybody. It’s so important to have a range of therapies.”

She added: “Everyone is talking a lot more about mental health.
“There have often been negative connotations around it. But if we get across that there are these more positive spaces and experiences out there, then we are changing how we talk about it.”

How dare she! Harry would NEVER! :laugh:

[Oliver_W]

Kate making nasty underhand jibes about therapy suggests that it's not the same behind the scenes :hehe:.
Sometimes (talking) therapy doesn't work for everyone :shrug: One would be hard-pressed to say it's doing wonders for Prince Harry.

But the statement looks less nasty and underhand when not viewed in a trimmed headline:
The desperate reaching. Context, SB, context. :nono:

During the visit, Kate asked: “Has producing music and taking part in those workshops helped? Has it helped with your personal lives?”
One young person replied that using music as a tool helped him express his emotions.

He said: “Producing music and letting out what you’re feeling is better than saying it in a clinical atmosphere.”
According to The Sun, Kate replied: “Talking therapies don’t work for some people, they’re not for everybody. It’s so important to have a range of therapies.”

She added: “Everyone is talking a lot more about mental health.
“There have often been negative connotations around it. But if we get across that there are these more positive spaces and experiences out there, then we are changing how we talk about it.”

How dare she! Harry would NEVER! :laugh:

[user104658]

Maybe I am confusing you with someone else

I literally made a post saying how much I was (genuinely) enjoying the "Spare" thread and then logged off, and when I came back it was GONE :laugh:. So I have no idea what happened after that post!

[jet]

The stark contrast between Big Willy and Kate visiting a hospital to thank staff and Harold doing the rounds of the TV studios to promote himself is far more valuable than any statement :hehe:

Absolutely. William and Kate's job is to serve, Harry and Meghan left the job to serve themselves.

[Cherie]

I literally made a post saying how much I was (genuinely) enjoying the "Spare" thread and then logged off, and when I came back it was GONE :laugh:. So I have no idea what happened after that post!

same :laugh:

[jet]

same :laugh:

Same here.

[bots]

i caught the thread about 10 mins before it expired and it had gone down hill pretty fast at that point :laugh:

[Cherie]

Air New Zealand has mocked the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after Prince Harry claimed Meghan booked her father on a first class flight with the airline. Harry wrote that his wife arranged a trip from Mexico to Britain for Meghan's dad, Thomas Markle, as they were concerned about media harassment ahead of the Sussexes' wedding day in 2018. Mr Markle was accused of staging photos for the paparazzi, which he denied. Harry wrote: "We told him, leave Mexico right now: A whole new level of harassment is about to rain down on you, so come to Britain. Now. We'll arrange for an apartment where you can hole up safely until your flight. Air New Zealand, first class, booked and paid for by Meg.

But a spokesperson for the airline told the New Zealand Herald it has never run flights between Mexico and the UK. They also said they only have Business Premier class.

In a cheeky tweet liked more than 2,000 times, Air New Zealand said: "Introducing #SussexClass Apparently coming soon ".


:laugh:

[user104658]

i caught the thread about 10 mins before it expired and it had gone down hill pretty fast at that point :laugh:

And you didn't think to screenshot it! :hmph:

[Swan]

Air New Zealand has mocked the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after Prince Harry claimed Meghan booked her father on a first class flight with the airline. Harry wrote that his wife arranged a trip from Mexico to Britain for Meghan's dad, Thomas Markle, as they were concerned about media harassment ahead of the Sussexes' wedding day in 2018. Mr Markle was accused of staging photos for the paparazzi, which he denied. Harry wrote: "We told him, leave Mexico right now: A whole new level of harassment is about to rain down on you, so come to Britain. Now. We'll arrange for an apartment where you can hole up safely until your flight. Air New Zealand, first class, booked and paid for by Meg.

But a spokesperson for the airline told the New Zealand Herald it has never run flights between Mexico and the UK. They also said they only have Business Premier class.

In a cheeky tweet liked more than 2,000 times, Air New Zealand said: "Introducing #SussexClass Apparently coming soon ".


:laugh:

Air New Zealand are all a bunch of irrational haters

[Oliver_W]

Air New Zealand has mocked the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after Prince Harry claimed Meghan booked her father on a first class flight with the airline. Harry wrote that his wife arranged a trip from Mexico to Britain for Meghan's dad, Thomas Markle, as they were concerned about media harassment ahead of the Sussexes' wedding day in 2018. Mr Markle was accused of staging photos for the paparazzi, which he denied. Harry wrote: "We told him, leave Mexico right now: A whole new level of harassment is about to rain down on you, so come to Britain. Now. We'll arrange for an apartment where you can hole up safely until your flight. Air New Zealand, first class, booked and paid for by Meg.

But a spokesperson for the airline told the New Zealand Herald it has never run flights between Mexico and the UK. They also said they only have Business Premier class.

In a cheeky tweet liked more than 2,000 times, Air New Zealand said: "Introducing #SussexClass Apparently coming soon ".


:laugh:
I blame the editors as much as the Sussexes for that tbh. No-one can remember every little thing (when you're as rich as them, booking one flight would be the same as any other) so the fact-checkers should have made sure that such a flight exists :laugh:

[bots]

I blame the editors as much as the Sussexes for that tbh. No-one can remember every little thing (when you're as rich as them, booking one flight would be the same as any other) so the fact-checkers should have made sure that such a flight exists :laugh:

if they employed fact checkers, the book would be reduced to ... "my name is Harry" :laugh:

[jet]

if they employed fact checkers, the book would be reduced to ... "my name is Harry" :laugh:

:laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

if they employed fact checkers, the book would be reduced to ... "my name is Harry" :laugh:

more like

"my"

[user104658]

To be fair I would have thought common sense would dictate that Air New Zealand doesn't do flights from Mexico to the UK :think:

[Jordan.]

The stark contrast between Big Willy and Kate visiting a hospital to thank staff and Harold doing the rounds of the TV studios to promote himself is far more valuable than any statement :hehe:

Both are for self promotion.

[user104658]

Both are for self promotion.

Indeed and the contrast is very deliberate, which makes it a little bit ... shady.

Shady. Anyone? No?

I feel like this thread has been a tragic waste.

[thesheriff443]

It didn’t involve me maybe it was us taking the p1ss out of harry

[arista]

I literally made a post saying how much I was (genuinely) enjoying the "Spare" thread and then logged off, and when I came back it was GONE :laugh:. So I have no idea what happened after that post!


Yes 2 Deleted threads.

Admin will not answer

[arista]

It didn’t involve me maybe it was us taking the p1ss out of harry


No
it is the same old posters cause Deletions

[jet]

Indeed and the contrast is very deliberate, which makes it a little bit ... shady.

Shady. Anyone? No?

So shady!! The Royals have been doing good works ever since poor wee Harry was born to torture and spite him! Scandalous! :laugh:

[Cherie]

Has anyone asked Harold why he didn't bother to make the effort to meet his future father in law during the engagement, I would be fascinated by the answer

[user104658]

So shady!! The Royals have been doing good works ever since poor wee Harry was born to torture and spite him! Scandalous! :laugh:

They knew it was going to happen this way in advance, because the ghost of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the 2nd can actually travel through time.

She visited Philip in the early 80's in a dream, and whispered to him a rumour. She told him of a great danger awaiting the Royals in the 2nd decade of the 21st century. A great ginger cataclysm. The Oncoming Storm. Assuming this to be the offspring of Camilla and Charles, Philip set about ensuring that they would never procreate. When he realised his great error, he tried once again to correct his error in 1997, assuming by removing the influence of The Mother, the danger might be averted. But the future has a funny way of righting itself - a perverse and cruel happenstance - and all of Philips actions, in the end, only provided more energy for the firey tempest. Had the spirit of the queen never visited him, would any of this have come to pass? Was all of this planned by the glowing one himself, as a self-fulfilling prophesy? Those were the thoughts that passed through Philips head in his final moments.

He had always liked Harry. What had he done.

"Spare 3: 5th Dimensional Rufescent Calamity", in all GOOD bookstores 2031.

[Cherie]

To be fair I would have thought common sense would dictate that Air New Zealand doesn't do flights from Mexico to the UK :think:

You have the book have you got to that inaccuracy yet?

[jet]

Has anyone asked Harold why he didn't bother to make the effort to meet his future father in law during the engagement, I would be fascinated by the answer

According to Tom Bower's research for his book, Meghan made sure they didn't meet in case Thomas inadvertently gave a different account of her childhood and certain events than Meghan had given Harry. She told him tall tales to make him believe she shared his pain of childhood trauma - a we have SO much in common thing.

Harry on radio interview "The Royals are the family she never had".
She barely knew her half sister and half brother brother etc.

....and on top of that, according to the impressions of some who worked with her in Toronto, she was ashamed of his appearance and unsophistication.

[user104658]

You have the book have you got to that inaccuracy yet?

I have the audiobook which is over 15 hours long and I have to stop for half an hour to calm down every time I get a little overexcited, so it's going to take a while.

[arista]

I have the audiobook which is over 15 hours long and I have to stop for half an hour to calm down every time I get a little overexcited, so it's going to take a while.


His Voice has too much Bass

[jet]

I have the audiobook which is over 15 hours long and I have to stop for half an hour to calm down every time I get a little overexcited, so it's going to take a while.

Excerpt SPARE 1/11/2023
I felt pretty sure she hadn’t googled me, because she was always asking questions. She seemed to know almost nothing—so refreshing. It showed that she wasn’t impressed by royalty, which I thought the first step to surviving it. More, since she hadn’t done a deep dive into the literature, the public record, her head wasn’t filled with disinformation.
After Willy and I had laid flowers at Mummy’s grave, we drove together back to London. I phoned Meg, told her I was on my way. I tried to keep my voice nonchalant, not wanting to give myself away to Willy. There’s a secret way into the hotel, she said. Then a freight lift.
All went according to plan. After I’d met the friend and navigated a sort of maze through the bowels of Soho House, I finally reached Meg’s door. I knocked and suspended breathing while I waited. The door flew open. That smile. Her hair was partly covering her eyes. Her arms were reaching for me. She pulled me inside and thanked her friend in one fluid motion, then slammed the door quickly before anyone saw. I want to say we hung a Do Not Disturb sign on the door. But I don’t think there was time.


SB: "I get a little bit over excited". :eureka: I bet you do, SB. :laugh:

[user104658]

His Voice has too much Bass

You can feel it ... down there. Slipping around your todger like a blob of Elizabeth Arden moisturizer. Turn the bass up HIGHER if anything, arista.

[Crimson Dynamo]

"She seemed to know almost nothing—so refreshing. It showed that she wasn’t impressed by royalty, which I thought the first step to surviving it"

F me how naive can a man get :joker:

[jet]

"She seemed to know almost nothing—so refreshing. It showed that she wasn’t impressed by royalty, which I thought the first step to surviving it"

F me how naive can a man get :joker:

In the Netflix doc, Meghan said she googled him on Instagram 'to find out about him'.

In that passage from from the book, Harry says "I felt pretty sure she hadn’t googled me, because she was always asking questions."

The whole thing is just bizarre.

[arista]

You can feel it ... down there. Slipping around your todger like a blob of Elizabeth Arden moisturizer. Turn the bass up HIGHER if anything, arista.


No I would not have that

Its just clips on TV
I have heard him.

[thesheriff443]

You can feel it ... down there. Slipping around your todger like a blob of Elizabeth Arden moisturizer. Turn the bass up HIGHER if anything, arista.

Clearly harry is making it hard for you!
To concentrate.

[Glenn.]

According to Tom Bower's research for his book, Meghan made sure they didn't meet in case Thomas inadvertently gave a different account of her childhood and certain events than Meghan had given Harry. She told him tall tales to make him believe she shared his pain of childhood trauma - a we have SO much in common thing.

Harry on radio interview "The Royals are the family she never had".
She barely knew her half sister and half brother brother etc.

....and on top of that, according to the impressions of some who worked with her in Toronto, she was ashamed of his appearance and unsophistication.

She didn’t have a relationship with her half sister :joker:

Her father sold her out for a quick buck. You have seen the pap shots right? Him reading about England or royalty or whatever he was reading in the window.

One thing that became clear was that she did not have the relationship you conspiracy theorists claim she had with her father. Given what transpired and the reason he wasn’t at the wedding I can see why. The bloke didn’t even have a heart attack :joker:

[Glenn.]

Christ he was even papped goggling ****. The guy is a waster

[jet]

She didn’t have a relationship with her half sister :joker:

Her father sold her out for a quick buck. You have seen the pap shots right? Him reading about England or royalty or whatever he was reading in the window.

One thing that became clear was that she did not have the relationship you conspiracy theorists claim she had with her father. Given what transpired and the reason he wasn’t at the wedding I can see why. The bloke didn’t even have a heart attack :joker:

Whereas Harry and Meghan are not accepting one dollar for selling out his family. You are inadvertently hilarious. :hehe:

You clearly haven't seen the screenshots of her Tig, blog, where (before Suits and a bit of fame) she praised him constantly as the best father a girl could ever have. Gushing stuff. :rolleyes:

[user104658]

It's not even inconsistent unless you're determined for it to be; he said it seemed like she hadn't "googled him" which given his relationship with the press, I take to mean that it seemed she hadn't read about him from the press perspective and hadn't had her idea of him influenced by that.

She said she had looked him up on Instagram, where she would have learned about him from ... him. Well, either that or someone managing his social media which seems likely, but either way a source directly sanctioned by him.

They're not even vaguely the same thing unless you're determined to make them similar. "Googled him on Instagram" doesn't even make sense :joker:.

[user104658]

There's also the quite simple fact that people are far more likely to state that their parents were great and then later admit the truth (to themselves as well as others) than they are to randomly say that their wonderful parents were terrible. It just doesn't really happen, it's fantasy stuff that parents who don't have the emotional fortitude to openly question their own parenting cling to. The idea that offspring might just randomly decide to say mean things about their parents for absolutely no reason. "It's not HIS fault, I'm sure he did his best!!! ... !"

[rusticgal]

To be fair I would have thought common sense would dictate that Air New Zealand doesn't do flights from Mexico to the UK :think:


Well you to have multi sector flights...but clearly they did not fly that route.

[rusticgal]

I have the audiobook which is over 15 hours long and I have to stop for half an hour to calm down every time I reach for the sick bucket, so it's going to take a while.


:hehe:

[jet]

No I’m not :joker:

I’m trying to work out when jet decided Meghan was a liar. Again by that logic, jet hasn’t always thought she was a liar because of the blog where she mentions her dad and how great he was.

If you’re going to paint a narrative at least make it consistent.

Most people didn’t even know Meghan from Eve until she met Harry. We decided Meghan was a liar when she got with Harry and told lies thereafter to suit her narrative. Simples.
Did she lie when she went on about how wonderful her Dad was? There is nothing to indicate that she didn’t mean it. There are home videos and photos of them together which show a very affectionate relationship.

[Beso]

This is neither series nor news and needs moved to chat and games.. DO YOUR JOBS MODS

[jet]

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/prince-harry-reminded-of-princess-diana-while-putting-cream-on-his-penis/news-story/8af5087180736ec55b6e1abcb391da6f

Prince Harry reminded of Princess Diana while putting cream on his penis

Explaining that a friend had recommended the home remedy for frostbite after an uncomfortable return from the North Pole, Harry recalled of telling them: “My mum used that on her lips. You want me to put that on my todger?”

After the friend’s reassurance, Harry found himself a tube, writing that the smell of it transported him back to his childhood.
“I felt as if my mother was right there in the room. Then I took a smidge and applied it … down there,” he wrote.
.................
That is just sick. Someone tweeted: This book is a Freudian nightmare.
He is obsessed with Diana in a very unhealthy way.

[Cherie]

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/prince-harry-reminded-of-princess-diana-while-putting-cream-on-his-penis/news-story/8af5087180736ec55b6e1abcb391da6f

Prince Harry reminded of Princess Diana while putting cream on his penis

Explaining that a friend had recommended the home remedy for frostbite after an uncomfortable return from the North Pole, Harry recalled of telling them: “My mum used that on her lips. You want me to put that on my todger?”

After the friend’s reassurance, Harry found himself a tube, writing that the smell of it transported him back to his childhood.
“I felt as if my mother was right there in the room. Then I took a smidge and applied it … down there,” he wrote.
.................
That is just sick. Someone tweeted: This book is a Freudian nightmare.
He is obsessed with Diana in a very unhealthy way.


a very strange recollection :umm2:

[Jordan.]

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/prince-harry-reminded-of-princess-diana-while-putting-cream-on-his-penis/news-story/8af5087180736ec55b6e1abcb391da6f

Prince Harry reminded of Princess Diana while putting cream on his penis

Explaining that a friend had recommended the home remedy for frostbite after an uncomfortable return from the North Pole, Harry recalled of telling them: “My mum used that on her lips. You want me to put that on my todger?”

After the friend’s reassurance, Harry found himself a tube, writing that the smell of it transported him back to his childhood.
“I felt as if my mother was right there in the room. Then I took a smidge and applied it … down there,” he wrote.
.................
That is just sick. Someone tweeted: This book is a Freudian nightmare.
He is obsessed with Diana in a very unhealthy way.

Oh dear looks like the tabloids have already exhausted their faux outrage if THIS is the best thing they can come up with now.

[Liam-]

Even after all the hysteria and hyperbole there’s been in the reporting and harassment of Harry and Meghan, I genuinely didn’t quite expect to get to the stage of implying that Harry wants to shag his dead mum tbh

[Cherie]

Even after all the hysteria and hyperbole there’s been in the reporting and harassment of Harry and Meghan, I genuinely didn’t quite expect to get to the stage of implying that Harry wants to shag his dead mum tbh

Think you might be the only one thinking that, I just find it odd that he was to associate a memory evoked by his mother with his todger, he could have given us numerous anecdotes that did not include his nether regions

[jet]

Think you might be the only one thinking that, I just find it odd that he was to associate a memory evoked by his mother with his todger, he could have given us numerous anecdotes that did not include his nether regions

Yeah, my mind didn't go THAT far. His refers to his mother so often it seems she is never out of his mind, even when dealing with his frostbitten 'todger'.
It's not healthy.
While it was obviously a very traumatic and horrific experience for him, she has been gone for over 25 years.

[thesheriff443]

Let’s all be honest, if Harry’s mother wasn’t Diana and her dying in a car crash when he was a child we would not be interested in harry at all.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FmCq_lSWQAMwWVV?format=jpg&name=small

From Monday.

[Glenn.]

Let’s all be honest, if Harry’s mother wasn’t Diana and her dying in a car crash when he was a child we would not be interested in harry at all.

No **** :joker:

[Vanessa]

William will make a great king one day. He will be committed like the late Queen and caring like his mum Diana.

[Jordan.]

Let’s all be honest, if Harry’s mother wasn’t Diana and her dying in a car crash when he was a child we would not be interested in harry at all.

Diana making the royals relevant again shocker. Unlucky for them her influence will fade with time and then we'll see how they survive.

[Crimson Dynamo]

William will make a great king one day. He will be committed like the late Queen and caring like his mum Diana.

Yes we are blessed with a lovely Royal couple and family in Wills and Kate

[thesheriff443]

Diana making the royals relevant again shocker. Unlucky for them her influence will fade with time and then we'll see how they survive.

No, she is only making her cry baby son relevant and his wife who are trading on her name that’s why they mention her in every other sentence.

On there own they are nothing

[jet]

Diana making the royals relevant again shocker. Unlucky for them her influence will fade with time and then we'll see how they survive.

There has been a Monarchy in England for 1200 years. How did they manage to survive before Diana came along. :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

There has been a Monarchy in England for 1200 years. How did they manage to survive before Diana came along. :laugh:

ouch :laugh:

[Jordan.]

There has been a Monarchy in England for 1200 years. How did they manage to survive before Diana came along. :laugh:

https://files.ekmcdn.com/ropeseller/images/hangmans-noose-light-pull-rope-bridport-dagger-1324-1-p.jpg?v=5435D6A6-F43F-4D6D-95F5-F1E2425DFA53

[jet]

https://files.ekmcdn.com/ropeseller/images/hangmans-noose-light-pull-rope-bridport-dagger-1324-1-p.jpg?v=5435D6A6-F43F-4D6D-95F5-F1E2425DFA53

Very apt Jordan. People are saying of Harry and Meghan "Give them enough rope and they'll hang themselves"....and its working. :hee:

[rusticgal]

I see he is back hurling insults again

:rolleyes:


Of course he is….remember ‘Silence’ is the real antagoniser…:laugh:

[rusticgal]

Very apt Jordan. People are saying of Harry and Meghan "Give them enough rope and they'll hang themselves"....and its working. :hee:


….and they have. They will now fester on the silence and resistance to react…:laugh:

[thesheriff443]

You won’t believe what harry has said now
He wants to save Williams kids and wishes William had took mind bending drugs because when harry took them he realised his mother had gone and wants him to be happy

Also there is enough for another book

[rusticgal]

William will make a great King. He is very astute…he has both his mums caring values and he has the dedication to his family, his father and the Queen…and upholding the values of the Royal family. He is surrounded by an amazing wife and adorable children that will uphold the traditions of the Institution that makes this country great.

[rusticgal]

You won’t believe what harry has said now
He wants to save Williams kids and wishes William had took mind bending drugs because when harry took them he realised his mother had gone and wants him to be happy

Also there is enough for another book

Where did he say that?

[thesheriff443]

Where did he say that?

It’s in the sun online taken from yet another interview

[Crimson Dynamo]

sickening

[rusticgal]

Digging his own grave….he needs to stop.

[Swan]

Christ

[Beso]

https://files.ekmcdn.com/ropeseller/images/hangmans-noose-light-pull-rope-bridport-dagger-1324-1-p.jpg?v=5435D6A6-F43F-4D6D-95F5-F1E2425DFA53

Ginger cry baby and his hewitt face would have fit right into that in the olden days..the crowds would have paid in their thousands to witness it..

[jet]

You won’t believe what harry has said now
He wants to save Williams kids and wishes William had took mind bending drugs because when harry took them he realised his mother had gone and wants him to be happy

Also there is enough for another book

Have a look at William, and then have a look at Harry....that's what drugs do to your mind...

What kind of message is he sending out to young people? He needs gagging once and for all.

[thesheriff443]

Remember, this is the prick that left the monarchy to save his family and have privacy

Now he wants to reform the monarchy to save Williams kids, what an utter twat

[rusticgal]

Clearly the silence is doing his head in…he is being provocative…he wants a reaction and he aint getting it…he and Megs must be having sleepless nights glued to their iPads :laugh:

[rusticgal]

Have a look at William, and then have a look at Harry....that's what drugs do to your mind...

What kind of message is he sending out to young people? He needs gagging once and for all.

Exactly Jet….he is a disgrace.

[user104658]

I think he might be the actual best troll in history at this point. Like I actually can't quite believe the scale of it. A shining moment after years of nothing but bleak news.

[Crimson Dynamo]

the silence from the Palace must be killing markle

lol

[rusticgal]

the silence from the Palace must be killing markle

lol


She will be pulling her hair out :laugh:…..they will both be bald by the end of the month…:laugh:

[jet]

She will be pulling her hair out :laugh:…..they will both be bald by the end of the month…:laugh:

It was reported that a neighbour in Monticeto heard the sound of crockery being smashed soon after the Oprah interview.
The crockery will be currently flying, they'll have none left. :laugh:

[Jordan.]

She will be pulling her hair out :laugh:…..they will both be bald by the end of the month…:laugh:

Omg he wants to be willy so bad!

[jet]

It gets worse...

The Duke of Sussex has revealed that he grew up knowing that he was there to give his older brother, the current heir to the throne, an organ donation if he needed it, New York Post reported.
As per the Post, Harry said, "I was the shadow, the support, the Plan B. I was brought into the world in case something happened to Willy."

Furthermore, the Duke of Sussex said he knew that his role was to be a "diversion" and "distraction" from his brother or to provide, "if necessary, a spare part" to him. "Kidney perhaps. Blood transfusion. Speck of bone marrow," he mentioned in his memoir.
--------------------
WTF. Not being born first has driven him nuts. He needs an apology from God.
Imagine parents having more than one child! I hope Wills and Kate’s second child, lovely little Charlotte doesn’t hear that he said this EVER.

[Beso]

It was reported that a neighbour in Monticeto heard the sound of crockery being smashed soon after the Oprah interview.
The crockery will be currently flying, they'll have none left. :laugh:

Oh, they had JD round.

I guess someone had to reply to the invite eventually.

[Beso]

Makes you wonder with all the ****e in the book, what other ****e didnt make it.


The blokes an absolute tool. It can not be denied by a sane minded person.

[Glenn.]

It gets worse...

The Duke of Sussex has revealed that he grew up knowing that he was there to give his older brother, the current heir to the throne, an organ donation if he needed it, New York Post reported.
As per the Post, Harry said, "I was the shadow, the support, the Plan B. I was brought into the world in case something happened to Willy."

Furthermore, the Duke of Sussex said he knew that his role was to be a "diversion" and "distraction" from his brother or to provide, "if necessary, a spare part" to him. "Kidney perhaps. Blood transfusion. Speck of bone marrow," he mentioned in his memoir.
--------------------
WTF. Not being born first has driven him nuts. He needs an apology from God.
Imagine parents having more than one child! I hope Wills and Kate’s second child, lovely little Charlotte doesn’t hear that he said this EVER.

Well he was the spare wasn’t he? Everything he said is true.

[jet]

Makes you wonder with all the ****e in the book, what other ****e didnt make it.


The blokes an absolute tool. It can not be denied by a sane minded person.

Precisely. Right on target.

[rusticgal]

It gets worse...

The Duke of Sussex has revealed that he grew up knowing that he was there to give his older brother, the current heir to the throne, an organ donation if he needed it, New York Post reported.
As per the Post, Harry said, "I was the shadow, the support, the Plan B. I was brought into the world in case something happened to Willy."

Furthermore, the Duke of Sussex said he knew that his role was to be a "diversion" and "distraction" from his brother or to provide, "if necessary, a spare part" to him. "Kidney perhaps. Blood transfusion. Speck of bone marrow," he mentioned in his memoir.
--------------------
WTF. Not being born first has driven him nuts. He needs an apology from God.
Imagine parents having more than one child! I hope Wills and Kate’s second child, lovely little Charlotte doesn’t hear that he said this EVER.


I read that….I mean what a vile comment. Anyone who has a second child wants a sibling for the first child…not a back up organ donator.

[arista]

Larger Image
Easy Read.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/C511/production/_128294405_croppedtel1001rc-dtndt-1-140123-a001c-dt-nc.png.webp

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-f00b3a39-3e99-4b00-9347-dc85d4624fdc.jpeg

[bots]

Harry is so transparent. He is trying to goad willie into responding. They weren't biting, so now he is starting to mention the kids

[Glenn.]

Prince Harry’s Spare becomes fastest-selling non-fiction book ever

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/news/2023/1/prince-harrys-spare-becomes-fastest-selling-non-fiction-book-ever-732915

A real boot in the teeth for the haters :clap1:

[Oliver_W]

It gets worse...

The Duke of Sussex has revealed that he grew up knowing that he was there to give his older brother, the current heir to the throne, an organ donation if he needed it, New York Post reported.
As per the Post, Harry said, "I was the shadow, the support, the Plan B. I was brought into the world in case something happened to Willy."

Furthermore, the Duke of Sussex said he knew that his role was to be a "diversion" and "distraction" from his brother or to provide, "if necessary, a spare part" to him. "Kidney perhaps. Blood transfusion. Speck of bone marrow," he mentioned in his memoir.

I wouldn't think twice about donating blood or organs to a close relative if needed :shrug: it goes without saying, why is he going all My Brother's Keeper over something most families would do for one another?

[Cherie]

I wouldn't think twice about donating blood or organs to a close relative if needed :shrug: it goes without saying, why is he going all My Brother's Keeper over something most families would do for one another?

Indeed, he might not even be a match...

[Cherie]

Harry is so transparent. He is trying to goad willie into responding. They weren't biting, so now he is starting to mention the kids

I have a regular Zoom call with some of my American cousins and they are all heartily sick of him even though they previously liked him....bringing big Willies kids into it is really low, and as for the book breaking records that says more about the interest in the Royal family and salacious gossip than any loyalty to Harry...I would liken it to the ghouls slowing down to look at a fatal car accident or the paps at Dianas

[arista]

I have a regular Zoom call with some of my American cousins and they are all heartily sick of him even though they previously liked him....bringing big Willies kids into it is really low, and as for the book breaking records that says more about the interest in the Royal family and salacious gossip than any loyalty to Harry...I would liken it to the ghouls slowing down to look at a fatal car accident or the paps at Dianas


Yes the true feelings
are a sign of his new Book
is not working well.


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/01/14/10/66570209-0-image-m-5_1673693278050.jpg
[He claimed that 'if people had listened'
to his concerns earlier, the gulf between
he and Meghan and the rest of the
royals would not have grown so wide.
He added: 'It was all so avoidable.]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11634693/Apologise-Prince-Harry-demands-Royal-Family-say-sorry-Meghan.html

[rusticgal]

So now Harry is saying he 'left a lot of bad stuff out because his brother and father would never forgive him....but there is enough for another book'

Is this almost like Blackmail???....what a nasty piece of work he has turned out to be.

[Zizu]

It will be interesting if Harry’s side of things prove to be the more accurate account … in the years to come


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

So now Harry is saying he 'left a lot of bad stuff out because his brother and father would never forgive him....but there is enough for another book'

Is this almost like Blackmail???....what a nasty piece of work he has turned out to be.

Great minds :hehe: I just came on to post this. :hee:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-prince-harry-blackmailing-his-family/

Is Prince Harry blackmailing his family?

…..Harry’s revelation that he has at least another book’s worth of considerably more scandalous material, which was dropped from his memoir for fear of causing irreconcilable offence, and his implicit threat that it could yet be published. In his words, ‘There are some things that have happened, especially between me and my brother, and to some extent between me and my father, that I just don’t want the world to know. Because I don’t think they would ever forgive me……’

The suggestion is clear: dance to my tune, or they will emerge in a future volume. He also states that the media has ‘a **** tonne of dirt’ about his family; the implication is that he will corroborate this, if required.
This appears to be, of course, nothing less than blackmail. Given that there are still questions swirling about how accurate Spare is – never did the phrase ‘recollections may vary’ seem more appropriate – then it would be easy to describe yet more scandalous revelations emerging as an attempt on Harry’s part to continue to convey his feelings of anger at his family in as public a fashion as possible. It also seems clear that the suggestion of further damaging revelations means that he is uninterested in any kind of behind-the-scenes peace settlement. He will not meet ‘the Firm’ halfway, or agree to anything other than a formal summit and a public apology.
...........
It is absolutely blackmail... my feelings now for this poor excuse for a man - just utter contempt.

[arista]

"It is absolutely blackmail"



He will not win.

[bots]

it's hardly blackmail when everyone knows harry has been paid for 4 volumes :laugh:

[arista]

Book 4

Could go in Poundland

[rusticgal]

it's hardly blackmail when everyone knows harry has been paid for 4 volumes :laugh:

Emotional Blackmail....its like Jet posted. Apologise to me and my wife and I wont say another word after publicly announcing he has worse stories to tell...

Its a threat and its emotional blackmail.

[Cherie]

So now Harry is saying he 'left a lot of bad stuff out because his brother and father would never forgive him....but there is enough for another book'

Is this almost like Blackmail???....what a nasty piece of work he has turned out to be.

It’s similar to the ‘concerns about Archie’s skin colour’ comment, it’s designed to get people speculating about what it could be and thinking badly of Charles and Big Willy, he will be back in a year saying he didn’t say it...and that it’s all the fault of the press :laugh:

[Glenn.]

:joker: :joker: :joker:

[jet]

it's hardly blackmail when everyone knows harry has been paid for 4 volumes :laugh:

Like Rusti understood, it's emotional blackmail, not monetary as we all know he's already been paid.
My understanding is that Harry and Meghan have a joint contract for 4 books.
The first was Meghan's The Bench, Harry's current book, a 'Wellness' (lol) book by them both...and the 4th? Possibly the blackmail book (Emotional). :p

[bots]

Willie beat him over the head with his teddy when he was 5

[Liam-]

Blackmail :joker:

[jet]

Willie beat him over the head with his teddy when he was 5

Probably happened in Willy's bigger bedroom. :hehe:

[Glenn.]

To think if the royal family supported Harry and Meghan instead of leaking stories to the press this wouldn’t have happened

[arista]

To think if the royal family supported Harry and Meghan instead of leaking stories to the press this wouldn’t have happened


Sure
but now they are Money Making Ex Royals.


Feel The Force

[arista]

Willie beat him over the head with his teddy when he was 5


how nice

[arista]

"Emotional Blackmail"


Yes Wicked

[thesheriff443]

Attention seeking

[rusticgal]

Probably happened in Willy's bigger bedroom. :hehe:


:joker:

[Cherie]

Probably happened in Willy's bigger bedroom. :hehe:

Bigger more luxurious bedroom...:laugh:

[Glenn.]

Sure
but now they are Money Making Ex Royals.


Feel The Force

Earning their own coin instead of handouts from taxpayers :clap1:

[Livia]

Selling gossip about your own family and imagining people see them as the wounded party. Deluded.

[Glenn.]

Meghans “family” did the same and they’re the wounded party :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/BRFguards/status/1613779506766155776?s=20&t=uiJu0wXZkVv6rEUsgmBZ5A

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/redsassypants/status/1614123612973453312?s=20&t=uiJu0wXZkVv6rEUsgmBZ5A

[hijaxers]

Meghans “family” did the same and they’re the wounded party :joker:

Well we'll soon see what they have to say when their Netflix programme airs.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/01/13/21/66558663-0-image-a-5_1673645761525.jpg

[Cherie]

Well we'll soon see what they have to say when their Netflix programme airs.

Are they doing one?

[jet]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Shop’s newspapers that weren’t on sale

During a visit to London in November 2016, weeks after she was revealed to be dating Harry, Meghan walked from Kensington Palace to the nearby branch of Whole Foods, an organic supermarket.
The prince says she queued at the check-outs. ‘Before her were rows and rows of magazines and newspapers, and on all of them, under the most shocking and disgusting headlines . . . was her. The other customers noticed as well. They looked at the magazines, looked at her, and now they too pulled out their phones, like zombies. Meg caught two cashiers sharing a horrible smile.’
All very dramatic and, if true, frightening. In fact, only one shopper recognised her — a journalist.
As for the headlines, on the day in question, November 10, Meghan did not feature on a single front page. Even if she had she wouldn’t have seen them at Whole Foods, because they don’t sell newspapers. And the only magazines it stocks are specialist lifestyle publications.
...........
That was the day Harry wrote that he came home to find Meghan sobbing and shaking and inconsolable...

[rusticgal]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Shop’s newspapers that weren’t on sale

During a visit to London in November 2016, weeks after she was revealed to be dating Harry, Meghan walked from Kensington Palace to the nearby branch of Whole Foods, an organic supermarket.
The prince says she queued at the check-outs. ‘Before her were rows and rows of magazines and newspapers, and on all of them, under the most shocking and disgusting headlines . . . was her. The other customers noticed as well. They looked at the magazines, looked at her, and now they too pulled out their phones, like zombies. Meg caught two cashiers sharing a horrible smile.’
All very dramatic and, if true, frightening. In fact, only one shopper recognised her — a journalist.
As for the headlines, on the day in question, November 10, Meghan did not feature on a single front page. Even if she had she wouldn’t have seen them at Whole Foods, because they don’t sell newspapers. And the only magazines it stocks are specialist lifestyle publications.
...........
That was the day Harry wrote that he came home to find Meghan sobbing and shaking and inconsolable...


:hehe:.....you couldnt make it up...oh no hold on a minute...Harry did :laugh:

[AnnieK]

https://twitter.com/BRFguards/status/1613779506766155776?s=20&t=uiJu0wXZkVv6rEUsgmBZ5A

William is totally punching :laugh:

[jet]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Art A-level ‘cheat’ scandal

A year after leaving Eton, Harry was accused by an art teacher of cheating in A-level coursework. ‘Broken-hearted, I wanted to release a statement, hold a press conference, tell the world: I did the work! I didn’t cheat,’ he writes. The cold-hearted Palace wouldn’t let him, he alleges. ‘In this, as in most things, the Palace stuck fast to the family motto: never complain, never explain. Especially if the complainer was an 18-year-old boy.’

All very scandalous. But also untrue: the Royal Family did release a statement, which strenuously denied the claims.
It was circulated by Clarence House on the day the story broke in October 2004 and begins: ‘It is not true that Harry cheated in his exam.’ It roundly dismissed what it called ‘unfounded allegations by a teacher in the context of a dispute with the school.’
Eton also described the claims as ‘untrue’ and ‘absurd’.

[rusticgal]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Art A-level ‘cheat’ scandal

A year after leaving Eton, Harry was accused by an art teacher of cheating in A-level coursework. ‘Broken-hearted, I wanted to release a statement, hold a press conference, tell the world: I did the work! I didn’t cheat,’ he writes. The cold-hearted Palace wouldn’t let him, he alleges. ‘In this, as in most things, the Palace stuck fast to the family motto: never complain, never explain. Especially if the complainer was an 18-year-old boy.’

All very scandalous. But also untrue: the Royal Family did release a statement, which strenuously denied the claims.
It was circulated by Clarence House on the day the story broke in October 2004 and begins: ‘It is not true that Harry cheated in his exam.’ It roundly dismissed what it called ‘unfounded allegations by a teacher in the context of a dispute with the school.’
Eton also described the claims as ‘untrue’ and ‘absurd’.


It seems that a few of the situations Harry says the palace did not support him and he and Meghan are being proved to be completely untrue…

[thesheriff443]

William is totally punching :laugh:

He’s not called big Willy for nothing anniek

[Cherie]

Spare needs to be recategorised ASAP to a work of fiction

[Cherie]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Art A-level ‘cheat’ scandal

A year after leaving Eton, Harry was accused by an art teacher of cheating in A-level coursework. ‘Broken-hearted, I wanted to release a statement, hold a press conference, tell the world: I did the work! I didn’t cheat,’ he writes. The cold-hearted Palace wouldn’t let him, he alleges. ‘In this, as in most things, the Palace stuck fast to the family motto: never complain, never explain. Especially if the complainer was an 18-year-old boy.’

All very scandalous. But also untrue: the Royal Family did release a statement, which strenuously denied the claims.
It was circulated by Clarence House on the day the story broke in October 2004 and begins: ‘It is not true that Harry cheated in his exam.’ It roundly dismissed what it called ‘unfounded allegations by a teacher in the context of a dispute with the school.’
Eton also described the claims as ‘untrue’ and ‘absurd’.

I mean a simple google shows this as a pack of lies I think I remember this as well :laugh2:

Royal Family denies Harry cheated
Prince Harry
Prince Harry got a B for his art A-level
The Royal Family has denied a claim that Prince Harry cheated in his art A-level.
The allegation is said to have been made by a former teacher at Eton who is taking the college to an industrial tribunal claiming unfair dismissal.

Sarah Forsyth reportedly said a senior master told her to help the prince answer questions enabling him to achieve a B grade.

Clarence House said an investigation by an examination board had concluded there had been no cheating.

Ms Forsyth will make her allegations when she appears at the tribunal on Monday, the News of the World said.

The newspaper reported that the former teacher claims she was asked to assist Prince Harry to compile his AS-level art coursework journal. The marks from this discipline counted towards his final A-level grade.

The private school's board has denied the allegations.

'Unsubstantiated'

Teachers sent the prince's 2002 exam paper to be double-checked anonymously by the exam board, but no irregularities were discovered.

The board, Edexcel, said in a statement that it did not comment on individuals but could confirm that in 2003 Eton contacted it about an allegation of cheating against a candidate.

"All such complaints are treated very seriously and always thoroughly investigated by experienced personnel," the board said.

"In this particular instance there was no evidence to support the claim. It was found to be unsubstantiated and the file closed."

The 20-year-old royal, whose other A-level pass was a D in geography, needed reasonable grades in order to help him qualify for Sandhurst military academy, where he will begin his army career in January.

The minimum Sandhurst entrance requirement is two A-levels and it is understood Prince Harry's military career could be at stake if one of his passes was shown to have been obtained by cheating.

A statement released by Clarence House dismissed the allegation as "unfounded".

"A full investigation into these allegations was held by the relevant exam board which found no evidence to support the claims."

Ms Forsyth is thought to have been turned down for a staff position at the school after three years on probation, before being offered a £10,000 pay-off.

Prince Harry, who is third in line to the throne, passed his Sandhurst entrance exams in September.

The Regular Commissions Board four-day test included obstacle courses, medicals and planning exercise.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3730684.stm

[jet]

Spare needs to be recategorised ASAP to a work of fiction

It seriously does. There is so much being exposed as made up rubbish.

Guy Adams and Richard Kay “Talk about recollections may vary”

Army ‘bunking off’ claim

Fast-forward to December 2004, and a knee injury saw Harry’s entry into the Army postponed. In Spare, he claims newspapers quickly ‘began pushing a story that I was afraid to go into the Army, that I was bunking off, using a fake knee injury as a way of stalling. I was, they said, a coward’.

Quite the claim. But is it true? The Mail is unable to find a single newspaper article covering the affair which contained the words ‘fake’, or ‘bunking off’ or ‘coward’. Neither can we find any piece which claimed he was afraid to enlist.

Harry later claims a hostile media reaction to the Army’s decision, in May 2007, to cancel plans to send him to Iraq. ‘The following week,’ Spare claims, newspapers ‘reported that the abrupt about-face in my deployment had been my own doing. The coward story again’.
In fact, newspapers universally described the prince as being ‘angry’ and ‘devastated’ to be missing out, with the Mail calling him a ‘courageous young man badly let down by his superiors’.

[Swan]

His memory and detail for all this is far too good to be true.

[jet]

:hehe:.....you couldnt make it up...oh no hold on a minute...Harry did :laugh:

:joker:

[hijaxers]

Are they doing one?

Yes they said they are sick of her lies and they have their own truth, so i can't wait for that one !

[Glenn.]

Selling gossip about your own family and imagining people see them as the wounded party. Deluded.

Meghans “family” did the same and they’re the wounded party :joker:

Can see this has been ignored :joker:

[Beso]

It seriously does. There is so much being exposed as made up rubbish.

Guy Adams and Richard Kay “Talk about recollections may vary”

Army ‘bunking off’ claim

Fast-forward to December 2004, and a knee injury saw Harry’s entry into the Army postponed. In Spare, he claims newspapers quickly ‘began pushing a story that I was afraid to go into the Army, that I was bunking off, using a fake knee injury as a way of stalling. I was, they said, a coward’.

Quite the claim. But is it true? The Mail is unable to find a single newspaper article covering the affair which contained the words ‘fake’, or ‘bunking off’ or ‘coward’. Neither can we find any piece which claimed he was afraid to enlist.

Harry later claims a hostile media reaction to the Army’s decision, in May 2007, to cancel plans to send him to Iraq. ‘The following week,’ Spare claims, newspapers ‘reported that the abrupt about-face in my deployment had been my own doing. The coward story again’.
In fact, newspapers universally described the prince as being ‘angry’ and ‘devastated’ to be missing out, with the Mail calling him a ‘courageous young man badly let down by his superiors’.

That would explain why he wanted to jump from pilot to gunner pilot to get a kill total.


Hopefully it wasnt civilians. I guess only the saved video evidence of the knight mounting the prawn would prove whatever

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-330a6f02-0763-41b4-920f-0b406fe47800.jpeg

[Cherie]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-330a6f02-0763-41b4-920f-0b406fe47800.jpeg

Just leave them where they are ...who cares

[rusticgal]

Of course the big difference is Meghans father was thrown into the spotlight…not used to having any sort of media attention…I don’t think he knew where to turn. I also think that Meghan was embarrassed of her own father…who would she rather walk her down the aisle watched by millions…the future King of England or her rather scruffy unkempt looking father. She’s a massive snob…image means so much to her…her family were not befitting her image…so she invited those that would…Hollywood elite at its best…most of whom she had never even met before. The only person she had there was her mother who ‘projected a bit of class’.
Despite everything she dropped her father at the drop of a hat…his selling of a story is NOTHING compared to what they have done.
Everything Harry and Meghan have done…they have never had a thought for anyone but themselves…it’s all about them and they will walk over everyone including their families for money and exposure. Meghan thinks she is so special that playing second fiddle to Kate was never going to be an option….

[rusticgal]

Just leave them where they are ...who cares


Yup…I agree.
If they come to the Coronation people won’t be so respectful as they were at the Queens funeral….and the disapproval will be well and truly heard.

[Beso]

Her father gave her everything, she returned with a locket full of ****e rustic..

Superb post.

[rusticgal]

Her father gave her everything, she returned with a locket full of ****e rustic..

Superb post.


Thanks Parmy…

The pair of them in trying to expose the wrong doings of everyone else…not taking one bit of responsibility, have only exposed themselves for what they are…over privileged self indulgent idiots…who are desperate for everyone to believe they are victims…they have manipulated the truth for their own gain…and in doing so they have shot themselves in the foot…:laugh:

[Glenn.]

The two situations are no different :joker:

Meghans dad sold his stories to the press without any regard to anyone’s feelings. Harry’s done the same.

You cannot with a straight face defend one and chastise the other. It stinks of hypocrisy.

[rusticgal]

Just read an interesting article by Sarah Vine….where is Meghan? :laugh:

[arista]

Just leave them where they are ...who cares


Yes Sunday Times
Front page today

King Charles want's to
bang their heads together




Harry has to have his own Netflix Film Crew
with him.


That is wrong.

[GoldHeart]

nBRaQPwSgac

[Swan]

nBRaQPwSgac

Lol :joker:

[bots]

Yes Sunday Times
Front page today

King Charles want's to
bang their heads together



thats obviously nonsense, big Willie hasn't said anything, why should his head be banged at all :laugh:

[rusticgal]

thats obviously nonsense, big Willie hasn't said anything, why should his head be banged at all :laugh:


No William hasn't....however I dont know that William will ever forgive Harry for what he has done and I wouldn't blame him.

[jet]

I think it would be a mistake to ‘make up’ with Harry unless in a ‘sit down and talk’ summit, which Harry has said he wants, Charles and William take the opportunity to demonstrate to Harry how delusional and paranoid he has become by having an evidence dossier ready that refutes the claims he made about leaks and plants and not doing anything to protect Saint Meghan. All the inconsistencies, the lies. Make him face the truth - with the proof.
Otherwise, no amount of ‘talking’ will convince Harry that he and Meghan aren’t totally blameless and everything is the Royals fault.
Then he needs to realise that he needs proper help, not help from a lot of quack LA therapists cashing in on his problems.

[bots]

the royals would be best to do nothing at all, just ignore Harry. They shouldn't even consider inviting him to the coronation. Nothing will convince Harry of anything, so there is just no point

[jet]

the royals would be best to do nothing at all, just ignore Harry. They shouldn't even consider inviting him to the coronation. Nothing will convince Harry of anything, so there is just no point

Oh I absolutley agree. But if these recently reported 'peace talks' have any truth to them, something more than talking has to take place to drum some sense into Harry's thick skull.

[rusticgal]

the royals would be best to do nothing at all, just ignore Harry. They shouldn't even consider inviting him to the coronation. Nothing will convince Harry of anything, so there is just no point


I agree. Harry, I dont believe will settle for anything less than a public apology bfrom his Brother and Father..just because his own pride wont allow it. He has put it all out there and to back down will be seen as weak...despite the fact he is.

[Glenn.]

The two situations are no different :joker:

Meghans dad sold his stories to the press without any regard to anyone’s feelings. Harry’s done the same.

You cannot with a straight face defend one and chastise the other. It stinks of hypocrisy.

Can see no one has addressed this: I wonder why

[rusticgal]

Can see no one has addressed this: I wonder why


Maybe because we are all ignoring you on these threads...

[GoldHeart]

Can see no one has addressed this: I wonder why

You know full well I addressed it ,but the posts disappeared... I guess it didn't fit with your narrative.

[jet]

Maybe because we are all ignoring you on these threads...

Precisely. And it's already been addressed over and over again in the last few years...:laugh:

[Swan]

Precisely. And it's already been addressed over and over again in the last few years...:laugh:

It's all the H/M irrational defenders have though. The world can see what H/M are like now, some people just can't accept their hero's have been exposed for the liars and desperate attention seekers H/M are.

[jet]

An amusing article: :laugh:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-11636007/SARAH-VINE-Meghan-Shes-usually-grafted-Harrys-side.html

SARAH VINE: So where is Meghan? She’s usually grafted to Harry’s side

One thing really struck me about Prince Harry’s media blitz last week. Not so much the careless inaccuracies in his various accounts of events, from the death of the Queen Mother to recollections of his first date with Meghan. Nor even his petulance (bordering on naked aggression) towards the few hand-picked journalists enlisted to help sell his narrative whenever any of them dared ask him anything even vaguely approximating a searching question.
No, the real question in my mind is this: where was Meghan?
I don’t mean in terms of the book – after all, her fingerprints are all over that. I mean physically, where is she?
We haven’t seen hide nor hair of her for days. Which, really, is most uncharacteristic…….etc etc….

[rusticgal]

An amusing article: :laugh:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-11636007/SARAH-VINE-Meghan-Shes-usually-grafted-Harrys-side.html

SARAH VINE: So where is Meghan? She’s usually grafted to Harry’s side

One thing really struck me about Prince Harry’s media blitz last week. Not so much the careless inaccuracies in his various accounts of events, from the death of the Queen Mother to recollections of his first date with Meghan. Nor even his petulance (bordering on naked aggression) towards the few hand-picked journalists enlisted to help sell his narrative whenever any of them dared ask him anything even vaguely approximating a searching question.
No, the real question in my mind is this: where was Meghan?
I don’t mean in terms of the book – after all, her fingerprints are all over that. I mean physically, where is she?
We haven’t seen hide nor hair of her for days. Which, really, is most uncharacteristic…….etc etc….


Its brilliant...

[Glenn.]

You know full well I addressed it ,but the posts disappeared... I guess it didn't fit with your narrative.

I know you addressed it. I was talking more to the staunch Harry and Meghan haters not the newly converted.

The point I’m trying to make is that no one can argue with it. The one thing that has got the haters knickers in a twist is exactly what Meghans family did but they were applauded for it.

Irrational hatred at its finest. Pure deluded hypocrisy that cannon balls holes in any argument they have. Conveniently ignoring me, give me a break :joker:

[Liam-]

The woman can’t win, one minute people are saying they’re sick of the sight of her and want her to go away and shut her mouth, the next minute the same people are complaining we haven’t seen or heard from her, what do these awful people actually want? Other than something to be perpetually annoyed at, the weak little snowflakes

[Beso]

I know you addressed it. I was talking more to the staunch Harry and Meghan haters not the newly converted.

The point I’m trying to make is that no one can argue with it. The one thing that has got the haters knickers in a twist is exactly what Meghans family did but they were applauded for it.

Irrational hatred at its finest. Pure deluded hypocrisy that cannon balls holes in any argument they have. Conveniently ignoring me, give me a break :joker:



Difference being, meghans fathers stories all seemed to be about his loss of his daughter and the confusion as to why.

Harry is just attacking anything and everything without a care in the world. Hes blackmailing and slandering his family, whilst markle dad just wanted reconciliation with his daughter or at least a bit if closure as to why she has cut him off.


One is a desperate old man, whilst the other is an aggresive racist fool...that's why one can be defended whilst the other one cant.

[rusticgal]

the next minute the same people are complaining we haven’t seen or heard from her


I think you have misunderstood...no one is complaining its an observation :laugh:

[Glenn.]

The woman can’t win, one minute people are saying they’re sick of the sight of her and want her to go away and shut her mouth, the next minute the same people are complaining we haven’t seen or heard from her, what do these awful people actually want? Other than something to be perpetually annoyed at, the weak little snowflakes

They’re so ridiculous they can’t even see it :joker:

[Beso]

The woman can’t win, one minute people are saying they’re sick of the sight of her and want her to go away and shut her mouth, the next minute the same people are complaining we haven’t seen or heard from her, what do these awful people actually want? Other than something to be perpetually annoyed at, the weak little snowflakes

How do you know Sarah was sick off the site of her?

Or are you referring to other people who you are assuming feel that way.

[Liam-]

They’re so ridiculous they can’t even see it :joker:

They can see it, they just don’t care about their own hypocrisy because it just gives them more opportunities to beat them with their imaginary sticks

[Beso]

They can see it, they just don’t care about their own hypocrisy because it just gives them more opportunities to beat them with their imaginary sticks

You are speculating after one tweet.

[Glenn.]

They can see it, they just don’t care about their own hypocrisy because it just gives them more opportunities to beat them with their imaginary sticks

It’s kinda like they revel in being awful. Only on the internet though. Behind the safety of their keyboards.

[jet]

The woman can’t win, one minute people are saying they’re sick of the sight of her and want her to go away and shut her mouth, the next minute the same people are complaining we haven’t seen or heard from her, what do these awful people actually want? Other than something to be perpetually annoyed at, the weak little snowflakes

If most of us never seen or heard from the fake ever again, we'd be over the moon. :cheer2: :dance:

[bots]

If most of us never seen or heard from the fake ever again, we'd be over the moon. :cheer2: :dance:

speak for yourself, i live for her inspiring words :smug:

[rusticgal]

speak for yourself, i live for her inspiring words :smug:


:joker:

[thesheriff443]

speak for yourself, i live for her inspiring words :smug:

Your lucky to be alive

[Swan]

speak for yourself, i live for her inspiring words :smug:

Like her and Harry's other irrational worshippers :joker:

[Glenn.]

If most of us never seen or heard from the fake ever again, we'd be over the moon. :cheer2: :dance:

:joker: :joker: :joker: :joker: :joker:


**** that’s funny

[jet]

speak for yourself, i live for her 'inspiring' words :smug:

Did you mean to say 'lying' words? :hehe:

[rusticgal]

speak for yourself, i live for her inspiring words :smug:



How has she inspired you…:laugh:

[Jordan.]

If most of us never seen or heard from the fake ever again, we'd be over the moon. :cheer2: :dance:

You'd all have to find new personality traits.

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-88eebb29-943f-455d-8fb3-81b8b8c8ff32.jpeg

[user104658]

On the "Where's Meghan" stuff:

Doesn't it just highlight the deluded mindset of the obsessive Meghan Markle haters / "evil woman" narrative spinners... That they simply cannot fathom why she's not very public at the moment, and that it must be for some nefarious reason, not just the obvious reason - that it's Harry's book, Harry's story and Harry's fight with his family and always was. I know this doesn't fit the preferred fantasy of many people who are desperate to blame all of Harry's actions on his wife.

On the coronation:

Bit of a catch 22 for ol Charles. Yes having Harry there could be messy. But also exceptionally messy for him to be being crowned King, and one of his sons to not be there. Either way it's going to draw focus on the day, there's no way around it.

[thesheriff443]

On the "Where's Meghan" stuff:

Doesn't it just highlight the deluded mindset of the obsessive Meghan Markle haters / "evil woman" narrative spinners... That they simply cannot fathom why she's not very public at the moment, and that it must be for some nefarious reason, not just the obvious reason - that it's Harry's book, Harry's story and Harry's fight with his family and always was. I know this doesn't fit the preferred fantasy of many people who are desperate to blame all of Harry's actions on his wife.

On the coronation:

Bit of a catch 22 for ol Charles. Yes having Harry there could be messy. But also exceptionally messy for him to be being crowned King, and one of his sons to not be there. Either way it's going to draw focus on the day, there's no way around it.

Don’t start using the same language as Glenn for fcuk sake

People will naturally ask where is Meghan because they have been permanently joined at the hip

It’s wise of her to let harry take the back lash on his own, he might of sold a lot of his half price books but it has cost him dearly in terms of ever having a close relationship with his family but who’s to say harry didn’t put his foot down and said to Meghan he was going to do this on his own.

But no one on here really cares one way or the other.

[Glenn.]

But no one on here really cares one way or the other.

Jesus Christ :joker: you have zero self awareness.

Facts: moans when Meghan wants all the attention. moans when she’s silent.

Damned if she don’t, damned if she does.

Must be killing the haters to see their theory’s on Meghan’s behaviour fall apart just as they’d fall apart if they ever came face to face with them.

[thesheriff443]

This a big brother forum not a Meghan markle forum
Her and Harry’s shelf life is the same as fresh milk
When they are no longer in the news members will discuss something or someone else like we have been doing for years.

[rusticgal]

It seems that Harry didn't include a lot of stuff in his book. He didn't address the 'racist' comments that he apparently was privy to...and he didnt address the 'bullying allegations' against Meghan....which most likely will come out in her predicted book...which is probably why she isn't stuck to his arm and rubbing his back to bring up all his hot air...:laugh:

[thesheriff443]

It seems that Harry didn't include a lot of stuff in his book. He didn't address the 'racist' comments that he apparently was privy to...and he didnt address the 'bullying allegations' against Meghan....which most likely will come out in her predicted book...which is probably why she isn't stuck to his arm and rubbing his back to bring up all his hot air...:laugh:

You can guarantee he will be getting three sausages when he gets home

[Cherie]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-88eebb29-943f-455d-8fb3-81b8b8c8ff32.jpeg



This is the level of the book tbf

[user104658]

Funny story - I threw the biggest temper tantrum of my entire childhood aged about 8 because my sister got 3 sausages once and I only got 2. I went absolutely ****ing ham.

To be fair to little me; it wasn't about the sausage... my parents laughed at me when I got annoyed about it. And I absolutely ****ing flipped. I was throwing stuff, swearing at them, spitting :omgno:, my dad (who never laid a hand on me as a kid) had me pinned to a wall shouting to calm down and I was going OFF, thrashing about, wriggled free and ran away! ... escaped the house, got on my bike and ended up in a town nearly 10 miles away before I calmed down and turned around.

Sausage equity is serious business guys.

[thesheriff443]

Some men never get over sausage envy

[Cherie]

Funny story - I threw the biggest temper tantrum of my entire childhood aged about 8 because my sister got 3 sausages once and I only got 2. I went absolutely ****ing ham.

To be fair to little me; it wasn't about the sausage... my parents laughed at me when I got annoyed about it. And I absolutely ****ing flipped. I was throwing stuff, swearing at them, spitting :omgno:, my dad (who never laid a hand on me as a kid) had me pinned to a wall shouting to calm down and I was going OFF, thrashing about, wriggled free and ran away! ... escaped the house, got on my bike and ended up in a town nearly 10 miles away before I calmed down and turned around.

Sausage equity is serious business guys.

I think most of us can equate to a feeling a sibling is getting special treatment at times the problem is Haz is equating everything to big Willie being the heir when it was more about him being 3 years older and something that happens in most normal families...bigger bedroom...bigger portions ...it flips around though and the younger sibling gets more freedom as the old one has done the road testing :laugh:

[user104658]

equating everything to big Willie being the heir when it was more about him being 3 years older and something that happens in most normal families...

I think that's interesting and probably true, but hard to figure out which is which for someone in that very unique situation.

Also very true about more freedom for younger sibling - I have an older sister (so gender comes into it too) but my parents always wanted to know who she was with/that she was safe. From about age 15 they didn't give stuff where I was :oh:. In my later teens I used to just bunk down on friend's floors after nights out and didn't even tell them where I was. I coulda been dead in a ditch :hmph:.

[bots]

as the younger brother, i got hand me downs as a kid, not often, but it still happened, and it annoyed the crap out of me :laugh:

[Oliver_W]

I think that's interesting and probably true, but hard to figure out which is which for someone in that very unique situation.

Also very true about more freedom for younger sibling - I have an older sister (so gender comes into it too) but my parents always wanted to know who she was with/that she was safe. From about age 15 they didn't give stuff where I was :oh:. In my later teens I used to just bunk down on friend's floors after nights out and didn't even tell them where I was. I coulda been dead in a ditch :hmph:.

And where's your pitifilly entitled whinging book??!! Slacker.

[user104658]

And where's your pitifilly entitled whinging book??!! Slacker.

https://i.imgur.com/5ca3OJu.png

[arista]

https://i.imgur.com/5ca3OJu.png

2013 Happy Days


Conserv/LibDem Power.

[jet]

On the "Where's Meghan" stuff:

Doesn't it just highlight the deluded mindset of the obsessive Meghan Markle haters / "evil woman" narrative spinners... That they simply cannot fathom why she's not very public at the moment, and that it must be for some nefarious reason, not just the obvious reason - that it's Harry's book, Harry's story and Harry's fight with his family and always was. I know this doesn't fit the preferred fantasy of many people who are desperate to blame all of Harry's actions on his wife.


Not entirely, he has to take responsibility for what he does, but the opinion of many (including myself) is that to a large extent her influence is behind, in Harry’s words, “not the prince I was born but the man I have become" - and we know what sort of man he has become, don’t we?
The little crew who calls anyone whose opinion differs from theirs “deluded” “obsessive” “haters” will be delighted to see you joining their ranks.

[user104658]

Not entirely, he has to take responsibility for what he does, but the opinion of many (including myself) is that to a large extent her influence is behind, in Harry’s words, “not the prince I was born but the man I have become" - and we know what sort of man he has become, don’t we?
The little crew who calls anyone whose opinion differs from theirs “deluded” “obsessive” “haters” will be delighted to see you joining their ranks.

I only call differences of opinion deluded, obsessive and hateful when they're deluded, obsessive and hateful :joker:. There are plenty of very valid criticisms of Harry and Meghan and reasons not to personally like them and many people share those views well, reasonably, and proportionately.

And then... well... there's another group isn't there :laugh:

[jet]

I only call differences of opinion deluded, obsessive and hateful when they're deluded, obsessive and hateful :joker:. There are plenty of very valid criticisms of Harry and Meghan and reasons not to personally like them and many people share those views well, reasonably, and proportionately.

And then... well... there's another group isn't there :laugh:

Is there? Where? Could you give examples (per your opinion) of these deluded, obsessive and hateful posts?

[jet]

This is a very good example of Hateful:

Prince Harry. SPARE

"Unlike other matrons, Pat wasn't hot. Pat was cold. Pat was small, mousy, frazzled and her hair fell greasily into her always tired eyes. Pat didn't seem to get much joy out of life." Pat had many crosses to bear. "The biggest being her knees and spine. The latter was crooked, the former chronically stiff. Walking was hard, stairs were torture. She'd descend backwards, glacially. Often we'd stand on the landing below her, doing antic dances, making faces. Do I need to say who did this with the most enthusiasm?"

Yeah, you did, and you seem proud of it, you nasty, cruel little man…and instead of being ashamed, you put it in your book, not caring if she or her family could see it.

[user104658]

That's not hateful, it is quite thoughtless and inconsiderate to put it in the book assuming there was no prior knowledge but it's not hateful. He actually goes on to say that he enjoyed trying to make her smile or laugh because she didn't laugh often.

To say it's hateful that he did it at the time is laughable - he's talking about being a 12/13 year old boy. Lord help us all if the plan is to start judging us on things we did or said when we were 12 :joker:.

[hijaxers]

I think most of us can equate to a feeling a sibling is getting special treatment at times the problem is Haz is equating everything to big Willie being the heir when it was more about him being 3 years older and something that happens in most normal families...bigger bedroom...bigger portions ...it flips around though and the younger sibling gets more freedom as the old one has done the road testing :laugh:

I really think Harry, Harold , Haz :laugh: is stuck at age 12. all these silly things that still bother him most people grow out of, way before age 40.

[rusticgal]

That's not hateful, it is quite thoughtless and inconsiderate to put it in the book assuming there was no prior knowledge but it's not hateful. He actually goes on to say that he enjoyed trying to make her smile or laugh because she didn't laugh often.

To say it's hateful that he did it at the time is laughable - he's talking about being a 12/13 year old boy. Lord help us all if the plan is to start judging us on things we did or said when we were 12 :joker:.

Perhaps then as a grown man he should have thought twice about putting those hurtful things about a clearly crippled lady out of his book….:nono:

[user104658]

I really think Harry, Harold , Haz :laugh: is stuck at age 12. all these silly things that still bother him most people grow out of, way before age 40.

I think despite his best efforts he still has significant trauma from when his mother died, certainly. I don't think he's "stuck at 12" but let's play devil's advocate and say you're right and he is indeed a perpetual 12 year old.

Who do you think is ultimately the cause of that?

Because I don't think you're entirely wrong and I think William beneath a wafer-thin veneer is also much more hot-headed and volatile than an adult should ideally be. They both still display some "petulant teen" tendencies AND their relationship as brothers is not that of adult men, but teenage boys.

That can ONLY be down to how they were raised after Diana died.

I.e. A lack of real parenting. Raised by "the institution" and their schools.

Charles and all of his generation are the same.

Harry has at least tried to break away from it and forge a new path... Unfortunately the therapy he's sought out is the Americanised/Hollywood celeb brand of self-improvement that's far from ideal and he'd have been better served by some real philosophy and exploration rather than Los Angeles pop stuff but... It's better than nothing.

[user104658]

Perhaps then as a grown man he should have thought twice about putting those hurtful things about a clearly crippled lady out of his book….:nono:

Perhaps as a grown woman you shouldn't use the word "crippled" to describe someone with physical disabilities but I guess none of us is perfect?

[thesheriff443]

Is there? Where? Could you give examples (per your opinion) of these deluded, obsessive and hateful posts?

Yes I too want to see examples

[bots]

i don't think Harry is child like at all, i think he feels genuinely aggrieved, he just lacks basic intelligence and is egged on/encouraged by an ambitious wife. William is just the product of a privileged public school environment

[jet]

That's not hateful, it is quite thoughtless and inconsiderate to put it in the book assuming there was no prior knowledge but it's not hateful. He actually goes on to say that he enjoyed trying to make her smile or laugh because she didn't laugh often.

To say it's hateful that he did it at the time is laughable - he's talking about being a 12/13 year old boy. Lord help us all if the plan is to start judging us on things we did or said when we were 12 :joker:.

"Quite thoughless". Dear God.....unbelievable. I'm not judging him as a 12 yr old boy, I'm judging him NOW. He said did it to make her laugh...if the poor lady laughed it was as a defense mechanism, nothing will convince me she enjoyed being mocked in her pain and disability - and to describe her appearance in the book in that way is just beyond cruel.

[rusticgal]

Perhaps as a grown woman you shouldn't use the word "crippled" to describe someone with physical disabilities but I guess none of us is perfect?

He ridiculed her disabilities…described them in great detail in the knowledge that she and her family would read it….despicable.

[Oliver_W]

Perhaps then as a grown man he should have thought twice about putting those hurtful things about a clearly crippled lady out of his book….:nono:

Has there been any indication he's been thinking more than once?

[thesheriff443]

He ridiculed her disabilities…described them in great detail in the knowledge that she and her family would read it….despicable.

It’s about attacking the member instead of defending harry or Meghan it’s all they have because deep down they know they are wrong

[jet]

Because I don't think you're entirely wrong and I think William beneath a wafer-thin veneer is also much more hot-headed and volatile than an adult should ideally be. They both still display some "petulant teen" tendencies AND their relationship as brothers is not that of adult men, but teenage boys.

That can ONLY be down to how they were raised after Diana died.


No.
‘Early childhood, which spans the period up to 8 years of age, is critical for cognitive, social, emotional and physical development’.

Harry was spoiled rotten by Diana, who reportedly used to encourage his rebelliousness, telling him “You can do naughty things, just don’t get caught.
Harry was protected from the problems of his parents, by them and by Willliam, who Diana confided in about all her problems because 'he was so mature'!

At the time of Mexit, William said:

‘I’ve put my arm around my brother all our lives, I can’t do it anymore,’ -
https://www.marieclaire.co.uk/news/prince-william-prince-harry-quote-681486

You talk about William’s ‘temper’, but the only indication of that is when he was at his wits end with worry with Harry, who refused to listen to him. There is no indication that William is like a 'petulant teen', no matter how you try to paint him as on a par with Harry's awful behaviour. William has shown nothing but responsibilty in his role, and great restraint and dignity in the face of the treachery and disloyalty from Harry.
You are full of excuses for Harry (and Meghan) but assume things about other Royals to divert from their awful behaviour. You really aren't doing yourself any favours, as sheriff once observed, correctly.

[rusticgal]

Has there been any indication he's been thinking more than once?

No…that’s true

[GoldHeart]

He ridiculed her disabilities…described them in great detail in the knowledge that she and her family would read it….despicable.

There's so much irrelevant rubbish in the book by sounds of it , He's either oversharing or moaning . And I don't know why he thinks people want to know in detail about how he made fun of this disabled woman, does he not realise how bad it all sounds !? :bored: .

[Beso]

Perhaps as a grown woman you shouldn't use the word "crippled" to describe someone with physical disabilities but I guess none of us is perfect?


A bit harsh soldier boy. And condescending towards women.

[rusticgal]

There's so much irrelevant rubbish in the book by sounds of it , He's either oversharing or moaning . And I don't know why he thinks people want to know in detail about how he made fun of this disabled woman, does he not realise how bad it all sounds !? :bored: .


…and who really wants to know about his private parts.
The immaturity of Harry….pulls the punches on his own family but includes snippets of child-like scenarios in his life including the ridicule of a disabled woman at his school like we can all relate to the childish behaviour..all to try and lighten up the cowardly attack on his family in the knowledge they won’t retaliate…

[rusticgal]

Jeremy Clarkson apologises for remarks in a private message…but apology not good enough….:shrug:

Harry demanding an apology from Charles and William for the way they treated Meghan…. Will an apology ever be good enough :shrug:

[Cherie]

The Iranian regime has used Prince Harry's confession that he killed 25 Taliban in Afghanistan to take aim at Britain amid the escalating row over the execution of Alireza Akbari.

In a string of tweets criticising Britain's outrage over the killing of the British-Iranian dual national who was accused of spying, Iran claimed the country was 'in no position to preach'.

The official Twitter account of the Iran Foreign Ministry accused the Duke of Sussex of showing no remorse over the killings of 'innocent' lives and accused Britain of allowing this 'war crime'.

It said: 'The British regime, whose royal family member, sees the killing of 25 innocent people as removal of chess pieces and has no regrets over the issue, and those who turn a blind eye to this war crime, are in no position to preach others on human rights.'

The post was referring to a controversial passage about the death count from Harry's new memoir Spare which is already the subject of a mounting backlash.

The Iranian regime has used Prince Harry's confession that he killed 25 Taliban in Afghanistan to take aim at Britain amid the escalating row over the execution of Alireza Akbari (above)

[Glenn.]

Can see it’s being taken out of the context that’s actually present in the book .

[arista]

1615176712471601153

[Cherie]

1615176712471601153

:laugh2:

[Crimson Dynamo]

the stupid ginger fool is a worldwide laughing stock

lol

[thesheriff443]

Didn’t he do well
Would love to see the look on Meghan’s face .

[rusticgal]

:laugh2:



:joker:

[Swan]

1615176712471601153

The mainstream left is turning on them now in the US then. Wow, never thought i'd see it. Just shows only their hardcore irrational worshippers, like the 2 or 3 on here, are going to put up with their constant me me me, cry cry cry hypocrisy crap. :hehe:

[GoldHeart]

Can see it’s being taken out of the context that’s actually present in the book .

Now you sound like Harry , he fed the media and wanted the attention....now he's all " ohhhh but it was taken out of context" . The press is literally just quoting his own words. If he doesn't like it ,then why did he release a silly book.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/01/18/02/66688695-0-image-m-13_1674008025100.jpg
[Prince Harry is dubbed 'a stupid boy'
as growing number of ex-top brass criticise him
for revealing his Taliban kill count
after Iran used it to justify hanging Brit citizen
amid growing row over 'maniacal' regime's bid
to excuse the execution]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11646107/Prince-Harry-slammed-giving-ammunition-Iranian-regimes-propaganda-machine.html

[user104658]

"Used it to justify" is right, the idea that they weren't going to hang this person anyway is ludicrous, and I cannot get my head around people spending more energy focussed on criticising someone for something they wrote in a book than on the regime that actually executes people.

[bots]

iran is executing people in the hundreds and harry wrote a book .... like for like really :skull:

it just show how bad the media have become

[Liam-]

Look what Harry has done, first he killed Lizzie now he’s forcing the Iranians to execute people, the silly little boy!

[user104658]

I actually, at least somewhat, agree that he shouldn't have been quite so explicit in his detailing of his war kills (or at least, he should have provided more context about the thinking, and why soldiers often have to think that way to preserve their own mental health). That's on a personal level. I wouldn't have said the exact number and I would have given a lot more mental health context for the dehumanisation ("chess pieces") and why so many in the armed forces have to do it.

But seriously ... the messaging behind the tabloid spin on this is really quite sinister. It's basically saying "there are scary, violent people out there in the world who don't want you to say certain things, so we shouldn't say those things, as we might provoke them... we should keep our mouths shut, because who KNOWS what they might do, and it'll be all YOUR fault."

This is literally the goal of terrorism; to stifle speech and action with threats of violence and retribution. We're not supposed to cave to it. We're supposed to continue to live free, speak our minds, write whatever we want in our books. Not doing so out of fear of "what those bad people will do" is terrorism working, and it is WELL KNOWN that the #1 thing that encourages more terrorism, is an indication that terrorism is effective.

Harry is a free man who wrote about his own, personal, subjective experience of being a soldier in his own book. If violent groups and individuals do violent things because of that, that is on THEM, and all other soldiers should continue to write about their personal experiences of war undeterred. This is what "not giving in to terrorism" means.

[Cherie]

Look what Harry has done, first he killed Lizzie now he’s forcing the Iranians to execute people, the silly little boy!

You are missing the point...these are tweets from Iran not manufactured tabloid spin...speaking about your military life is one thing giving tyrannical regimes like Iran the exact number of kills is insane, of course they were going to seize on it for propaganda ....loose lips sink ships

[user104658]

You are missing the point...these are tweets from Iran not manufactured tabloid spin...speaking about your military life is one thing giving tyrannical regimes like Iran the exact number of kills is insane, of course they were going to seize on it for propaganda ....loose lips sink ships

Luckily there aren't any ex-soldiers who have written entire novels about their experiences of their time in the middle east or anything without any comment at all from the tabloids or "patriots", and it's just this one paragraph in Harry's book! Otherwise we might be in real trouble. Those terrorists would have us on the naughty step good 'n' proper :worry:. Sorry, terrorists and dictatorial regimes. I promise we won't do it again! Sorry, sorry...

[Cherie]

I actually, at least somewhat, agree that he shouldn't have been quite so explicit in his detailing of his war kills (or at least, he should have provided more context about the thinking, and why soldiers often have to think that way to preserve their own mental health). That's on a personal level. I wouldn't have said the exact number and I would have given a lot more mental health context for the dehumanisation ("chess pieces") and why so many in the armed forces have to do it.

But seriously ... the messaging behind the tabloid spin on this is really quite sinister. It's basically saying "there are scary, violent people out there in the world who don't want you to say certain things, so we shouldn't say those things, as we might provoke them... we should keep our mouths shut, because who KNOWS what they might do, and it'll be all YOUR fault."

This is literally the goal of terrorism; to stifle speech and action with threats of violence and retribution. We're not supposed to cave to it. We're supposed to continue to live free, speak our minds, write whatever we want in our books. Not doing so out of fear of "what those bad people will do" is terrorism working, and it is WELL KNOWN that the #1 thing that encourages more terrorism, is an indication that terrorism is effective.

Harry is a free man who wrote about his own, personal, subjective experience of being a soldier in his own book. If violent groups and individuals do violent things because of that, that is on THEM, and all other soldiers should continue to write about their personal experiences of war undeterred. This is what "not giving in to terrorism" means.


Apples and Oranges ..Harry is not some random soldier who documents his story...how likely is that going to come to the attention of terrorist regimes :shrug:

[Cherie]

Luckily there aren't any ex-soldiers who have written entire novels about their experiences of their time in the middle east or anything without any comment at all from the tabloids or "patriots", and it's just this one paragraph in Harry's book! Otherwise we might be in real trouble. Those terrorists would have us on the naughty step good 'n' proper :worry:. Sorry, terrorists and dictatorial regimes. I promise we won't do it again! Sorry, sorry...

With respect even if the tabloids dod not report it he has done innumerable interviews where it has been discussed

[user104658]

[/B]
[/B]

Apples and Oranges ..Harry is not some random soldier who documents his story...how likely is that going to come to the attention of terrorist regimes :shrug:

So you agree that the problem wasn't the paragraph in his book - the problem was the great honking spotlight that the media chose to shine on that paragraph. Quite right.

[Cherie]

So you agree that the problem wasn't the paragraph in his book - the problem was the great honking spotlight that the media chose to shine on that paragraph. Quite right.

No I dont agree with confirming the number of kills as you well know and that would go for any author

[user104658]

With respect even if the tabloids dod not report it he has done innumerable interviews where it has been discussed

It's been brought up by the interviewers because of the press attention it's gathered. And if you substitute "press attention" with "media attention" it amounts to the same; if any of these media outlets were as concerned as they pretend to be about the potential consequences of Harry's words, they wouldn't have them on our screens or front pages.

[jet]

With respect even if the tabloids dod not report it he has done innumerable interviews where it has been discussed

"Harry’s comments are also reminiscent of a separate controversy during a 2013 interview where he compared his control of the weapons system as a “joy,” likening it to “playing PlayStation and Xbox,” according to the Guardian".

[user104658]

No I dont agree with confirming the number of kills as you well know and that would go for any author

But you loosely agree that part of the issue here is that a spotlight was put on those words and it was drawn to the attention of these groups because of the world media attention, and that would not be the case if (when) someone else writes the same sort of words.

[Cherie]

It's been brought up by the interviewers because of the press attention it's gathered. And if you substitute "press attention" with "media attention" it amounts to the same; if any of these media outlets were as concerned as they pretend to be about the potential consequences of Harry's words, they wouldn't have them on our screens or front pages.

Harry will have agreed on what questions he will be asked about :shrug:

You can blame the media all you like but he signed off on it to sell books