Lady Susan Hussey is BACK performing official duties

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/02/22/22/67977773-11782189-image-a-14_1677103436323.jpg
Lady Susan was spotted visiting Buckingham Palace yesterday morning
(pictured). She used the staff entrance

A Royal pardon! Lady Susan Hussey is BACK performing official duties for
Princess Anne just three months after "resigning" to quieten racial hysteria row

When Princess Anne realised she would not be able to attend the memorial
service for Dame Frances Campbell-Preston on Tuesday at the Royal Hospital in
Chelsea, she turned to her mother's friend, 83, for help.

'Lady Susan was formally asked to represent the Princess Royal at the service,'
a family friend said. 'She was more than happy to do so. Her official position
was recorded in the order of service. It's great to see her back in the royal fold.'

Many considered that Lady Susan, widow of former BBC chairman Lord
(Marmaduke) Hussey, was humiliatingly hung out to dry when she was
obliged to 'step aside' from royal duties

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11782189/Lady-Susan-Hussey-performing-official-duties-behalf-Princess-Anne.html

Top Comment: Good luck to her in her new job. Hopefully that's the end of this ridiculous witch hunt.

[arista]

Yes, using her bus pass.
Helping Princess Ann.


Can do no harm

[bots]

Tomorrows headline will be Princess Anne employs known racist

[Cherie]

and so she should be, she apologised, the apology was accepted, end of story

[Liam-]

Of course she is, they love racists and racism

[Cherie]

Of course she is, they love racists and racism

so the woman accepted the apology because she thought Hussey was a racist, how dim do you think she is?

[jet]

Of course she is, they love racists and racism

Lets have some evidence, eh?
Did you miss Harry saying that she wasn't a racist, she was a lovely woman...and that the Royal family weren't racist. Meghan's lies exposed by her own husband which he was too cowed to do in the Oprah interview. :laugh:

[Liam-]

I’d accept an apology as well if I had the hordes of racists and royalists in the press and the population after me as she did, the poor woman was terrorised for having the audacity to be the victim of racism, the entire thing was completely shameful

[Oliver_W]

Of course she is, they love racists and racism

Where are you from?

[UserSince2005]

Make her queen please

[Alf]

Of course she is, they love racists and racismWhy don't you apply for a role? I think you fit the criteria.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The Palace have done up that awful "charity worker" like a kipper

:joker:

[rusticgal]

Good…

[Livia]

The charity worker who was so offended by a "racist" runs a domestic abuse charity for African and Caribbean women ONLY. Sounds a little exclusionary to me.

[Alf]

The charity worker who was so offended by a "racist" runs a domestic abuse charity for African and Caribbean women ONLY. Sounds a little exclusionary to me.She gets a free pass. She's not White. Which means she can't be racist. Them's the time's we:re living in. If you accept that?

[Mystic Mock]

She gets a free pass. She's not White. Which means she can't be racist. Them's the time's we:re living in. If you accept that?

Anybody can be racist, it would be uneducated for anybody to say otherwise.

However having a Charity dedicated to certain communities isn't prejudiced imo, otherwise there's a lot of prejudice within Children In Need and Comic Relief then.

[Alf]

Anybody can be racist, it would be uneducated for anybody to say otherwise.

However having a Charity dedicated to certain communities isn't prejudiced imo, otherwise there's a lot of prejudice within Children In Need and Comic Relief then.Not really, Children in need and Comic relief are said to help out many communities, it's not ever been said it discriminates based on the colour of one's skin (although they're both probably scams that give out a few quid here and there to give the impression that they're not scams)

Her charity apparently discriminates based on skin colour. I don't know if that's true, but that's the assumption we get.

[Mystic Mock]

Not really, Children in need and Comic relief are said to help out many communities, it's not ever been said it discriminates based on the colour of one's skin (although they're both probably scams that give out a few quid here and there to give the impression that they're not scams)

Her charity apparently discriminates based on skin colour. I don't know if that's true, but that's the assumption we get.

Children In Need helps out children in the UK, to some people they could argue that it's discrimination because it's only one country being helped, or the fact that it's called Children In Need and not All In Need so that they could then help out adults as well as kids.

Obviously I'm playing devil's advocate here, I honestly don't care who Children In Need helps, or this woman's Charity as long as they're helping decent people improve their lives.

[bots]

it's not discrimination for a fund raiser to only help out the country where the money is raised, nor is it discriminatory to target the African continent.

It is discriminatory for a charity that is focussed on abused women, to turn away white women