The paedo version of Naked Attraction for children

[user104658]

"Naked Education" on Channel 4. Highly questionable/slightly disturbing.

[bots]

it's got the word education in the title, so it must be ok .....


wtf

[arista]

Yes it was on Yesterday at 8PM Ch4HD


I was amazed full Naked Humans
shown to those kids.

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/04/05/07/69497227-11940669-image-m-26_1680676164719.jpg

The Women had not Shaved their area etc.

The One Fella had a small willy

[arista]

Is there a thread for this already?


No TS
just yours

[Crimson Dynamo]

In the news today full nasty details of horrific sexual child abuse in the west midlands. Tragic that utter filth like this is aired as entertainment

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/04/05/07/69497225-11940669-image-m-29_1680676196514.jpg

The Girls were giggling

[arista]

In the news today full nasty details of horrific sexual child abuse in the west midlands. Tragic that utter filth like this is aired as entertainment


Yes, I made thread on those 21


https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=385009



I think this Ch4 show got government funding
under Education

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/04/05/07/69497577-11940669-However_some_people_watching_the_show_defended_it_ and_said_it_wa-m-39_1680677186535.jpg



Or


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/04/05/07/69497161-11940669-image-a-21_1680675605180.jpg

[arista]

The Host was Anna Richardson

[arista]

1642451813088501760

[arista]

Next week is part 2

8PM Ch4HD Tuesday

It has 6 one hour parts

[arista]

TS

Why paedo
in your title?

[Crimson Dynamo]

*normalising*

[arista]

Sure, LT
they will watch it.


It's Educational
for teens.

Anna Richardson
thinks this is the correct way of doing this.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Sure, LT
they will watch it.


It's Educational
for teens.

Anna Richardson
thinks this is the correct way of doing this.

It is not educating teens it's exploiting them

[arista]

It is not educating teens it's exploiting them


Sure, this is the Debate.


Anna could have had a
proper debate about this, first
but she feels that her experience
is enough to go ahead with these 6 episodes.
Using Government TV Funding


Clever to start while Parliament is away on Holiday.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FszwX1VXgAIuILG?format=png&name=small


Anna is 52


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Richardson

[thesheriff443]

I watched some of it
I think the teenagers involved were very mature about the subjects being raised
There was a woman who had a condition which ment she was covered in hair even having a beard

[arista]

I watched some of it
I think the teenagers involved were very mature about the subjects being raised
There was a woman who had a condition which ment she was covered in hair even having a beard



Yes Anna is using all types in the show

[thesheriff443]

They reckon kids as young as 8 and 9 are sharing explicit pictures of themselves

[Beso]

Next week is part 2

8PM Ch4HD Tuesday

It has 6 one hour parts



Scat?

[arista]

Scat?



It's not poop

[UserSince2005]

C4 are just perverted

[Oliver_W]

Anna is 52

And she's still allowed on TV??!!

[GiRTh]

What is the point in this? Really?

I've ripped into this show before on here. I dont know why anyone would watch the full version never mind this monstrosity.

The show they're using to spread this 'message' is one of the worst on TV. We're really trying too hard in certain areas and not using the best resources to educate young people

[Crimson Dynamo]

What is the point in this? Really?

I've ripped into this show before on here. I dont know why anyone would watch the full version never mind this monstrosity.

The show they're using to spread this 'message' is one of the worst on TV. We're really trying too hard in certain areas and not using the best resources to educate young people

well said Girth

[Glenn.]

Most of them ‘kids’ have likely watched porn also. Let’s not pretend kids are sensitive to this sort of thing.

[thesheriff443]

Most of them ‘kids’ have likely watched porn also. Let’s not pretend kids are sensitive to this sort of thing.

It’s only gone and happened
Me and Glenn agreeing on something

[arista]

Presenter on GMBHD itv Kate Garraway
is not comfortable,
with Teens in front
of Adult Naked Bodies at 8PM on Ch4HD.

[arista]

And she's still allowed on TV??!!


Of Course
Anna's age is given
as it is public.


She is a Journalist.


Her photo with that wig
makes her look younger.
So it is good to give her Real Age

[arista]

1643879009552302081

[Oliver_W]

On the one hand, promoting body acceptance* is fine. Everyone should be comfortable in their own skin.
*I say acceptance, not positivity. There's nothing positive about looking like you can't climb a flight of stairs without hyperventilating.

On the other, we don't need overweight people to remove their clothes to know they have rolls.

[Oliver_W]

Most of them ‘kids’ have likely watched porn also. Let’s not pretend kids are sensitive to this sort of thing.

And they've almost certainly seen a fictional character die in a film or tv show, but that doesn't justify making them attend a live execution.

(They literally are kids, and wrapping airquotes around that word is a little troubling)

[Niamh.]

What is going on with all these weird naked shows? Before I opened this thread I saw two adds on TV for other shows where the contestants are Naked and Naked attraction wasn't even one of them. So grim. And this one is seriously odd

[arista]

What is going on with all these weird naked shows? Before I opened this thread I saw two adds on TV for other shows where the contestants are Naked and Naked attraction wasn't even one of them. So grim. And this one is seriously odd




Another 5 shows to go.


They are teens
all Nude people were checked.

[thesheriff443]

And they've almost certainly seen a fictional character die in a film or tv show, but that doesn't justify making them attend a live execution.

(They literally are kids, and wrapping airquotes around that word is a little troubling)

Kids with internet access can and do watch violent sex, straight sex , gay sex, basically any form of sex .

Like me and Glenn have both said, I know don’t fall over !

Those involved are mature young adults

Adults will watch this show more than children and hopefully they will learn to accept people for who they are.

[Oliver_W]

Kids with internet access can and do watch violent sex, straight sex , gay sex, basically any form of sex .
Yes, they may well have seen performed depictions of sexual encounters, created in controlled environments. And if they've seen Star Wars, they'd have watched multiple shootings and forced amputations.

[GoldHeart]

I don't get the obsession with nudity either, and why is there this attitude of "oh well kids have already seen worse" , isn't that alarming?? even if it's true ?. Plus it doesn't make it ok .

When I was that age in sex education ,we never had live adult models rocking up to classrooms and stripping naked. I understand teaching them about different body types,but this just looks weird.

Also this isn't the first time Anna Richardson had done a 'sex education ' for teens. I remember a while back she was showing teens how STDs are tested and that was pretty graphic . Some of the kids looked traumatised and embarrassed.

[thesheriff443]

Yes, they may well have seen performed depictions of sexual encounters, created in controlled environments. And if they've seen Star Wars, they'd have watched multiple shootings and forced amputations.

Millions of people have sex and issues with there bodies and people accepting their choices than the few people That are killing each other .

[Cherie]

Kids with internet access can and do watch violent sex, straight sex , gay sex, basically any form of sex .

Like me and Glenn have both said, I know don’t fall over !

Those involved are mature young adults

Adults will watch this show more than children and hopefully they will learn to accept people for who they are.

Since when was 14 considered adulthood?

[user104658]

The fact that they can (and will have) seen it online isn't the point at all. For one - the issue isn't even kids WATCHING the show, watching something on a screen that features nudity is very different to a child being in the physical presence of a naked adult.

The aim here seems to be to normalise (stranger, non-familial) adult nudity in front of children. It's literally a classic part of grooming tactics. There's also no need at all for it - it's been done to be deliberately provovative. No need at all for any of the people in that room to be under 16, preferably not under 18.

13 and 14 year old kids?

"But it's OK because they look at porn on their phone anyway" so Mr Smith from down the street might as well get his cock out for them I suppose. :facepalm:

[user104658]

Adults will watch this show more than children and hopefully they will learn to accept people for who they are.

To clarify Sheriff as it seems like you might have misunderstood what my issue was with this show;

It's not that they're encouraging teenagers to watch the show - it's that there is a section of the show where there are young teenagers physically in the room while the adults get naked and they're invited (or prompted) to comment on/ask questions about them.

Again that's very different to seeing nudity on-screen at home.

[thesheriff443]

To clarify Sheriff as it seems like you might have misunderstood what my issue was with this show;

It's not that they're encouraging teenagers to watch the show - it's that there is a section of the show where there are young teenagers physically in the room while the adults get naked and they're invited (or prompted) to comment on/ask questions about them.

Again that's very different to seeing nudity on-screen at home.

I see what you are saying but their parents will have given their permission

Teenagers know more today than we ever knew when we where growing up.

[thesheriff443]

Since when was 14 considered adulthood?

The police can arrest a ten year old or ask them to attend an interview with a responsible adult

So basically a ten year old is viewed as being old enough to know right from wrong and be responsible for their actions

[Cherie]

The police can arrest a ten year old or ask them to attend an interview with a responsible adult

So basically a ten year old is viewed as being old enough to know right from wrong and be responsible for their actions

That still doesn't make them an adult though, they cant vote, get married, drink, get a mortgage, they are children..


If they wanted children to be accepting of bodies they could have looked at other children as that would have been a bit more relatable though still doesnt make any sense .... to me any way

[Gusto Brunt]

In the news today full nasty details of horrific sexual child abuse in the west midlands. Tragic that utter filth like this is aired as entertainment


:clap1: :clap1:

[GoldHeart]

The police can arrest a ten year old or ask them to attend an interview with a responsible adult

So basically a ten year old is viewed as being old enough to know right from wrong and be responsible for their actions

"Old enough" is a dangerous mindset , as it will just continue to give perverts a green light to expose kids to all-sorts.

And I agree with soldier that teens watching it on TV is different to being present in the room with naked adults .

[Glenn.]

The fact that they can (and will have) seen it online isn't the point at all. For one - the issue isn't even kids WATCHING the show, watching something on a screen that features nudity is very different to a child being in the physical presence of a naked adult.

The aim here seems to be to normalise (stranger, non-familial) adult nudity in front of children. It's literally a classic part of grooming tactics. There's also no need at all for it - it's been done to be deliberately provovative. No need at all for any of the people in that room to be under 16, preferably not under 18.

13 and 14 year old kids?

"But it's OK because they look at porn on their phone anyway" so Mr Smith from down the street might as well get his cock out for them I suppose. :facepalm:

Mr smith getting his cock out would be without permission from parties involved. These teenagers are on the show with permission and consent.

[user104658]

Mr smith getting his cock out would be without permission from parties involved. These teenagers are on the show with permission and consent.

And there it is.

The idea that a 14 year old can consent. That's the slippery slope that makes this a massive safeguarding problem -- the idea that the only difference between a flasher assaulting a teenager and a perfectly legitimate encounter is consent.

In other words ... do you think it would be OK for Mr Smith to get his cock out for a group of teenage girls if he asked them if they want to see it first and they said "Sure lol" ...?

[user104658]

Teenagers know more today than we ever knew when we where growing up.

That's just not universally true from what I've seen, my daughter is nowhere near as "worldly" as I was at 14 and from what I've seen of the kids in her yeargroup, yeah they're exposed to a lot in media, but actually I find them less "grown up" seeming than ever these days. They might style their hair and do their make-up a lot better than teenagers did when I was at school, but just because they look less like kids doesn't mean they're any more emotionally mature.

[Oliver_W]

Some of the arguments on here are scarily close to the "if there's grass on the pitch..." and "they wanted it" excuses.

Note- not making any insinuations or accusations about anyone here.

[arista]

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/5a74076c98ba0e86ee8e2faa786432e0d55fb751/60_0_1800_1080/master/1800.jpg?width=700&quality=45&dpr=2&s=none

[Oliver_W]

There's no need to bodyshame, it doesn't matter what they look like :shrug:

[arista]

There's no need to bodyshame, it doesn't matter what they look like :shrug:


Sure
that is all to come
5 more one-hour episodes.


Tuesdays 8PM Ch4HD

[Oliver_W]

Sure
that is all to come
5 more one-hour episodes.


Meh.

I'm not even sure this show is effective in showing different body types - we all know overweight people exist, and them removing their clothes doesn't exactly reveal anything new.

What about people with severe birthmarks, or other skin conditions? Scars from surgery? Burns? Women with hirsutism?

All of this could be concealed by clothing, and people with such things might actually do something for body acceptance, and a form of it which isn't spoken of so much.

I'm not saying they should strip naked in front of children :joker: but at least revealing their differences (in an appropriate manner) might have some educational value.

[Mystic Mock]

There's no need to bodyshame, it doesn't matter what they look like :shrug:

Their bodies look better than mine.:joker:

Well most of them anyway.

[Alf]

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/5a74076c98ba0e86ee8e2faa786432e0d55fb751/60_0_1800_1080/master/1800.jpg?width=700&quality=45&dpr=2&s=noneWho ate all the pies? Who ate all the pies? You fat bastard, you fat bastard, you ate all the pies.

[Alf]

The fantastic Andrew Lawrence




UkRiU5Q0IOc

[Niamh.]

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/breaking-naked-education-slapped-930-29690773?fbclid=IwAR0B0vHd0u-XwtTb6638kRXoy9xqkU07xA8UpL6PRaYRyyqzOZJN_gqeV0Q

[arista]

Who ate all the pies? Who ate all the pies? You fat bastard, you fat bastard, you ate all the pies.


The Education Programme
is showing all people

[arista]

1645878212117901315

[arista]

https://i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk/incoming/article29684419.ece/ALTERNATES/s458/0_nakedmen_main.jpg

[arista]

https://i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk/incoming/article29691131.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/1_Naked-Education-branded-brave-by-fans-while-others-fume-over-filthy-show.jpg

[arista]

https://i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk/incoming/article29691140.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/2_Naked-Education-Ep1.jpg
Anna Richardson host's the show
she says it is good education for 11 year olds etc.

[arista]

1645878218631831552


Katz is Chief Content Officer at Ch4 UK

[GoldHeart]

https://i2-prod.dailystar.co.uk/incoming/article29691140.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/2_Naked-Education-Ep1.jpg
Anna Richardson host's the show
she says it is good education for 11 year olds etc.

She talk so much crap , she's got an obsession with nudity but weirdly would probably never get naked herself .

When I was 11 I never sat in a classroom full of full frontal naked adults , all under the guise of 'Education'. All this is of course Is pushing boundaries.

Just like that degrading silly Naked Attraction she hosts . I'll bet you anything the next stage will be letting kids touch them like they're just 'mannequin science props' . Anna will be like " Sure just go ahead and feel the different body shapes isn't it fascinating" :crazy: .

[Crimson Dynamo]

1645878218631831552


Katz is Chief Content Officer at Ch4 UK

and is talking bollocks to defend his nonce show

[Oliver_W]

They could spread the exact same message about accepting different body shapes etc by having them wear swimsuits.

There's just no need or excuse for it.