Consevative Suella Braverman Home Sec. : Job Safe

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-b75d9edb-7d13-4010-9979-c346139b4d6d.jpeg

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-b725577c-7686-4397-afe7-4ce20e0a87b6.png


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-4444e994-9ac0-422d-a645-b1f3a5df19ba.png

[Alf]

What's she done wrong? Has she put the bog roll on the wrong way around on the bog roll holder or something?

[bots]

So now it's a crime to ask if you can do something? That's a new one on me

[arista]

Labour say
she is not to use civil servants
to help fix it.


I am sure they would

[arista]

2:30PM
she is meant to be in Parliament
Home Office questions

Last time, Labour went potty
as she sent in more able
Chis Philp MP
in her place.

[bots]

labour are setting themselves up for a whole lot of trouble when they take office. If they moan about trivialities they can expect the same when they are in power

[arista]

https://twitter.com/GMB/status/1660533660141928450

[joeysteele]

Not necessarily for this issue which I don't think has much about it.

She however has broken the code before, she was dropped by another PM.
Sunak brought her back
Braverman should never have been a Minister under any PM.
She only is because on the backbenches Sunak knows she could gather a strong element of those against him.

It's not just Labour pushing this, the LibDems are in the hunt too.

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwtnTO1WIAA2T4p?format=jpg&name=small

[Liam-]

It’s hardly trivial is it, she tried to get civil servants to do something for her personally so she could avoid public embarrassment and scrutiny, it’s an abuse of power, on top of all the other nonsense she’s been allowed to get away with as well

[arista]

It’s hardly trivial is it, she tried to get civil servants to do something for her personally so she could avoid public embarrassment and scrutiny, it’s an abuse of power, on top of all the other nonsense she’s been allowed to get away with as well



No need for a Inquiry, then.
Slick Liam.

Sack her Today

[joeysteele]

No need for a Inquiry, then.
Slick Liam.

Sack her Today


What a good idea.

[bots]

Sunak didn't sack Raab for asking a civil servant to jump out a window, so i think sacking her now is highly unlikely :laugh:

[arista]

Sunak didn't sack Raab for asking a civil servant to jump out a window, so i think sacking her now is highly unlikely :laugh:



Yes but,
he has a Good Fast Replacement
possible


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Official_portrait_of_Chris_Philp_MP_crop_2.jpg/440px-Official_portrait_of_Chris_Philp_MP_crop_2.jpg

Chris Philp MP, 46
already in the cabinet,
as Home Office Minister

[UserSince2005]

Another faux scandal by the media to cripple the country

[arista]

https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1660609328464687105

[arista]

She is meant to be in Parliament
today around 2:30PM

Clock ticking

[arista]

Suella Now Live


BBCnewsHD
SkyNewsHD
GBnewsHD
ParliamentHD

[arista]

Prime Minister Sunak
is considering a Investigation.

His Ethics Adviser should just tell Sunak
Sack Her.

[joeysteele]

Prime Minister Sunak
is considering a Investigation.

His Ethics Adviser should just tell Sunak
Sack Her.

The Ethics Advisor should indeed.

[arista]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/B5E3/production/_129836564_i-nc.png.webp

[arista]

[Rishi Sunak decides not to order inquiry into
Suella Braverman speeding row]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65694017

[Liam-]

Shock, he’s terrified of holding the extremists in his party accountable for anything because he made endless shady deals with them to secure his job, integrity my ass

[arista]

Shock, he’s terrified of holding the extremists in his party accountable for anything because he made endless shady deals with them to secure his job, integrity my ass



https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1660782192476438531/rB6CxoNV?format=jpg&name=small

[joeysteele]

He wouldn't dare.
This is really just to avoid problems she WOULD absolutely bring about if he dared to do anything negative regarding her.

Awful way to run a governnent.
Fishy Sunak failing again.

[bots]

in fairness every political party does the same, and if we had a PR system, it would be a lot worse :laugh:

[joeysteele]

in fairness every political party does the same, and if we had a PR system, it would be a lot worse :laugh:

Nothing could be worse than this failing first past the post.

PR is coming.
Maybe not in a manifesto for the coming election but it is coming.
The overwhelming vote for it at Labours last 2 conferences will not now go away.

I came round to PR years ago now.
It couldn't be in any way worse than this system now.

The only people strongly against PR are likely to be in the main, hard-line Con supporters, hard-line Con members and the Con party itself.
The ONLY Party that is against it of all Parties in existence are the Cons.

Because they know they'll NEVER again have absolute power to create the extreme hard-line governing they've done in recent years.
Rightly they'd never get absolute power alone and equally so rightly neither would Labour.
Or in fact any other Party.

They'd need more consensus policies to govern with other, like minded policies, Parties.

Why Starmer won't do it now as policy in the coming election is puzzling to me.
He'd guarantee walking the next election with the LibDems and all other Parties on board with him.
That would be a real positive change in politics.
I can't wait for it.

It's not the full answer to all the political set up issues but it will be the strongest start to being.
The Cons, their members, their hard-line supporters would be messing themselves.