Hannah Pearl Davis, 27 is the USA Female version Andrew Tate

[arista]

https://www.livemint.com/lm-img/img/2023/07/02/600x338/Pearl_1688275875042_1688275881971.png

https://www.livemint.com/news/world/women-should-not-vote-controversial-youtuber-hannah-pearl-davis-andrew-tate-s-female-counterpart-explains-why-11688275704136.html


She started talking about a time when
only 5% of women wanted to vote
because of Dividing the family.

She cares about Men and Women.

And Stated, go work on the Oil Rigs
if you women want to be like men.

She,
was talking on Piers Morgan TalkTV HD
last week.
With angry young Feminist sitting next to her,
Ava Santina






I have many of his shows
Recorded

[Crimson Dynamo]

t6R62g-NkYc

[Niamh.]

Ugh she's painful to listen to. One would wonder with all of her opinions on men, women, marriage etc Why she's not married with kids herself at 27, she's pushing on now ............

[Crimson Dynamo]

:joker:

[Liam-]

Awful woman who doesn’t actually believe anything she says, just a plain old grifter trying to make money, that’s not even really that good at the grift

[Crimson Dynamo]

j0nSFFqxl9U

[arista]

Ugh she's painful to listen to. One would wonder with all of her opinions on men, women, marriage etc Why she's not married with kids herself at 27, she's pushing on now ............


You must like her Views
Feminist Women should work on Oil Rigs

[Niamh.]

You must like her Views
Feminist Women should work on Oil Rigs

I never get this logic. Why should they work on Oil rigs? should weak men work on oil rigs? Men who aren't good with their hands? Men who just don't want to work on oil rigs, should they be forced to or else treated like second class citizens? Some women do work on oil rigs, mostly men do though because in general men are physically stronger, what's your point?

[arista]

I never get this logic. Why should they work on Oil rigs? should weak men work on oil rigs? Men who aren't good with their hands? Men who just don't want to work on oil rigs, should they be forced to or else treated like second class citizens? Some women do work on oil rigs, mostly men do though because in general men are physically stronger, what's your point?

Very Simply Put by Hannah
She says you want to be Equal
Go Work on a Oil Rig.

[Niamh.]

Very Simply Put by Hannah
She says you want to be Equal
Go Work on a Oil Rig.

No that's not an answer Arista, not to the questions I asked. Can I ask you what do you mean "if I want to be equal"? What do you think I as a woman shouldn't be allowed to do because I don't want to work on an Oil Rig? Do you mean i shouldn't be allowed to vote because I'm not working on an Oil Rig?

Women can work on Oil Rigs btw, some do, just like men can be nurses but mainly women are, so?

[Niamh.]

VqzG91RlpgE

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://www.indy100.com/media-library/davis-has-said-she.png?id=34280821&width=776&height=516&coordinates=0%2C54%2C0%2C12&quality=80

[Niamh.]

Perfect couple ^ :laugh:

[arista]

No that's not an answer Arista, not to the questions I asked. Can I ask you what do you mean "if I want to be equal"? What do you think I as a woman shouldn't be allowed to do because I don't want to work on an Oil Rig? Do you mean i shouldn't be allowed to vote because I'm not working on an Oil Rig?

Women can work on Oil Rigs btw, some do, just like men can be nurses but mainly women are, so?


I am Putting it as she spoke on Piers Morgan
show Talk TV HD last week.

The Nice Lady next to her
said she is not built like a man
or like her,
and would not be able to work on a oil rig


Hannah Smiled.

[Swan]

Never heard of her, i gather from this thread she has controversial views on a "woman's place".

People hate Candice Owens and say she only says what she does to make money. I think that's so insulting, as she does make some very good points, some are ridiculous granted. The vile comments i've seen thrown at her only goes to show that the far left have no time for anyone who doesn't believe exactly what they do, and follow their narrative to the letter. I've seen her called a race traitor, brainwashed by whites, a evil woman only out for profit etc. Could just be she knows her own mind, and has a clear view on how she feels.

But again, i dunno about this Hannah woman and how she compares to Candice.

[Niamh.]

I am Putting it as she spoke on Piers Morgan
show Talk TV HD last week.

The Nice Lady next to her
said she is not built like a man
or like her,
and would not be able to work on a oil rig


Hannah Smiled.

I think she goes by Pearl. You should watch the video I posted :smug:

[arista]

https://www.indy100.com/media-library/davis-has-said-she.png?id=34280821&width=776&height=516&coordinates=0%2C54%2C0%2C12&quality=80


Yes, she does not agree with everything he says,
but said he is good for helping
young men.

[Crimson Dynamo]

DHs7p6o5oBo

[Niamh.]

Never heard of her, i gather from this thread she has controversial views on a "woman's place".

People hate Candice Owens and say she only says what she does to make money. I think that's so insulting, as she does make some very good points, some are ridiculous granted. The vile comments i've seen thrown at her only goes to show that the far left have no time for anyone who doesn't believe exactly what they do, and follow their narrative to the letter. I've seen her called a race traitor, brainwashed by whites, a evil woman only out for profit etc. Could just be she knows her own mind, and has a clear view on how she feels.

But again, i dunno about this Hannah woman and how she compares to Candice.

I've watched both, they're very different people. Candice's views are very much her views as far as I can tell, whether people agree with them or not, she also seems to live by what she says. Pearl (Hannah) as Liam said is clearly a grifter, if you get time watch the video i posted to see why

[arista]

DHs7p6o5oBo



Thank You LT
for Finding that interview



I love Ava next to her trying to have a go at her.

[arista]

I think she goes by Pearl. You should watch the video I posted :smug:


Sure but on
The UK Broadcast I watched
she is Hannah

[Crimson Dynamo]

Piers face at 6.14 :laugh2:

[Swan]

I've watched both, they're very different people. Candice's views are very much her views as far as I can tell, whether people agree with them or not, she also seems to live by what she says. Pearl (Hannah) as Liam said is clearly a grifter, if you get time watch the video i posted to see why

Im only 46 seconds in and she just said "if a woman cheats she wants to leave you, and if a man cheats it's just like a handshake" both not true and yeah that completely bonkers, and im on 46 secs in!

A women doesn't cheat because she wants to leave you fgs :joker: (in some cases maybe, but not on the whole)

[arista]

Piers face at 6.14 :laugh2:


Yes, the two of those Ladies
will be invited back.


Of Course that UK Show
is also shown on Fox Nation (The FoxNewsHD Online Server)

[Crimson Dynamo]

I see a lot of her on tiktok

[Swan]

I can't speak for all men, but men wanting "young and pure" women is a totally wrong and draconian view.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I can't speak for all men, but men wanting "young and pure" women is a totally wrong and draconian view.

Well most men when finding a partner in your 20s would not want a woman with a "Wagner-esque" body count :laugh:

[Niamh.]

Oh god where did all these awful terms spring from all of a sudden? "Body Count" I thought that was reserved for serial killers :laugh:

[Niamh.]

I can't speak for all men, but men wanting "young and pure" women is a totally wrong and draconian view.

What about human connection and chemistry, the way these people talk about relationships is very transactional and not like they're looking for an actual partner in the literal sense of the word. I feel sorry for people looking for that type of relationship actually.

[arista]

I can't speak for all men, but men wanting "young and pure" women is a totally wrong and draconian view.


(Piers Morgan Video)
Ava sitting right next to her,
made those points.




But Hannah is at least very honest.

[Swan]

Well most men when finding a partner in your 20s would not want a woman with a "Wagner-esque" body count :laugh:

Im not saying men want a women who's been with 100 different men by her mid 20's. But the young and pure thing is about 60 years too old in this day and age. People often start their first relationship in their teens, more times than not they have sex, and even more common is both reach their late teens/early 20's and realise their feelings have changed since they were 15/16 say, and they want different things.

I don't see why it would be a deal breaker for a guy if a woman has had a couple one night stands and flings by her mid 20's. If i was back in my mid 20's i'd much rather a women who's had experience in sex and relationships, it's healthy. It shows you've experienced what you want in a partner, what you don't want, what you like, don't like. I think both men, and women have a much clearer view after experience in these areas and makes for a much healthier and lasting relationship in the future. Rather than saving themselves for the man or women of their dreams, which is completely unrealistic anyway.

[Swan]

What about human connection and chemistry, the way these people talk about relationships is very transactional and not like they're looking for an actual partner in the literal sense of the word. I feel sorry for people looking for that type of relationship actually.

Yeah exactly, i covered how i personally feel in my reply to LT. Yep, it wont have the love and personality to survive, and if it does both people will probably be unhappy deep down anyway.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Oh god where did all these awful terms spring from all of a sudden? "Body Count" I thought that was reserved for serial killers :laugh:

Neem you need to keep your ear to the street, its what gen-z say

like "yo bruv - i aint going out wiv dat ho she has a well high body count and I am a top G -you feeling me mandem innit"

Then have a vape and a drink of Prime

:smug:

[Niamh.]

Im not saying men want a women who's been with 100 different men by her mid 20's. But the young and pure thing is about 60 years too old in this day and age. People often start their first relationship in their teens, more times than not they have sex, and even more common is both reach their late teens/early 20's and realise their feelings have changed since they were 15/16 say, and they want different things.

I don't see why it would be a deal breaker for a guy if a woman has had a couple one night stands and flings by her mid 20's. If i was back in my mid 20's i'd much rather a women who's had experience in sex and relationships, it's healthy. It shows you've experienced what you want in a partner, what you don't want, what you like, don't like. I think both men, and women have a much clearer view after experience in these areas and makes for a much healthier and lasting relationship in the future. Rather than saving themselves for the man or women of their dreams, which is completely unrealistic anyway.

Absolutely agree. In my experience, a man that doesn't want a woman just because she's slept with a few guys is probably not the kind of person you would want to have a relationship with anyway because he clearly doesn't view women as a proper human being like he is. That sounds a bit dramatic but I truly do believe that, especially when usually these guys think it's perfectly fine for men to have slept with as many women as they wanted. It means they don't view women as equal to them but more like a possession. That type of relationship is not for me

[Niamh.]

Neem you need to keep your ear to the street, its what gen-z say

like "yo bruv - i aint going out wiv dat ho she has a well high body count and I am a top G -you feeling me mandem innit"

Then have a vape and a drink of Prime

:smug:

:laugh:

[Swan]

Absolutely agree. In my experience, a man that doesn't want a woman just because she's slept with a few guys is probably not the kind of person you would want to have a relationship with anyway because he clearly doesn't view women as a proper human being like he is. That sounds a bit dramatic but I truly do believe that, especially when usually these guys think it's perfectly fine for men to have slept with as many women as they wanted. It means they don't view women as equal to them but more like a possession. That type of relationship is not for me

What you say makes perfect sense, imo anyway. And yeah, the view that it's cool for a man to sleep around, and that he's a "top g" if he does and celebrated by his peers, but that if a woman sleeps with different men she's a slut is absolutely ridiculous. Why can't a single women enjoy sex like a single bloke does without being branded "unworthy of marriage and a partner". It's such a weird stance to have.

It's a very selfish stance too. A guy that wants young and pure basically means he wants to show you what his idea of sex is, and what he expects from sex from you. Sod that, that's controlling ,and boring for the woman. Trust me young lads (if any are on here) experience in a woman is MUCH better. Not some lifeless shag whenever you feel like it because some think it's the "wifey's duty" to pleasure you whenever you feel like it. How soulless and boring!

[Crimson Dynamo]

Pearl also has a Wife School channel


Mfid7MjGXs0

[Niamh.]

I don't think they give great advice or style tips on that :laugh:

[Niamh.]

This one is for you Arista :p

ZUFGqVrAkss

[Crimson Dynamo]

This one is for you Arista :p

ZUFGqVrAkss

MEH

No different than a newspaper headline


or any advert

or the Bank of England with their "we love trans people" bollocks

Everyone is selling something

[Niamh.]

MEH

No different than a newspaper headline


or any advert

or the Bank of England with their "we love trans people" bollocks

Everyone is selling something

Have you watched it? I specifically said it was for Arista though because it focuses a lot on her "women can't vote unless they work on oil rigs" argument

[Crimson Dynamo]

Have you watched it? I specifically said it was for Arista though because it focuses a lot on her "women can't vote unless they work on oil rigs" argument

Yes but he seems to be mad at her for being popular on youtube and selling her particular schtick for likes - everyone is at that game on YT

[Niamh.]

Yes but he seems to be mad at her for being popular on youtube and selling her particular schtick for likes - everyone is at that game on YT

exposing her particular grift i would argue but anyway he didn't come across mad at her to me, just a bit confused by her stupid points :hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

exposing her particular grift i would argue but anyway he didn't come across mad at her to me, just a bit confused by her stupid points :hee:

:oh:

[arista]

"This one is for you Arista"

Yes Easy Work for him.

[arista]

Pearl has done it Now


Signing about Hitler

She had to Delete it


She was in Piers Morgan London Show

[Crimson Dynamo]

Pearl has done it Now


Signing about Hitler

She had to Delete it


She was in Piers Morgan London Show

you cant sing about Hitler?

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/ChrissieMayr/status/1684583194371190784?s=20

[arista]

you cant sing about Hitler?


Depends on what you sing.


She had to Delete it
FAST

[arista]

Stupid Pearl

Singing "why can't Hitler be a good guy"

[Crimson Dynamo]

she is looking for a positive historical angle

[arista]

she is looking for a positive historical angle


Too Late.


She sang a Stupid Song

[arista]

Hitler is not a good guy

As she sang with her Guitar


Good Piers Played some of it



Hitler is Pure Evil.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Hitler is not a good guy

As she sang with her Guitar


Good Piers Played some of it



Hitler is Pure Evil.

he was quite the guy back in the day

history has not been kind on him

like Barrymore

[Crimson Dynamo]

Uz1uh3FQulY

[arista]

Thanks, LT, for posting the Video

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1684724308654911488?s=20

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F2zIomeWUAA_uDA?format=jpg&name=900x900


https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1687944571194355712

[The Slim Reaper]

Tibb anti-Semitism experts when a real example exists...


https://imageio.forbes.com/specials-images/imageserve/64b2890430e8bb337b534a0f/bird-box1/960x0.jpg?format=jpg&width=960

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690197411862609920

[Oliver_W]

I remember I once saw a youtube video where some bloke was trying to make an argument that women shouldn't vote. He was speaking to a "panel" of two young women - I can't remember the names of anyone involved ( :joker: ) but he was using a cartoon avatar, and the two ladies both had long brown hair.
I thought they'd rip him a new one, but as he was talking they were nodding thoughtfully!

[Mystic Mock]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690197411862609920

I can say that in my experience there have definitely been women that have been better than me at certain things.

Basically she's not really on point with what she's saying.

[Alf]

DHs7p6o5oBoHow authoritarian was that blonde?

"I don't think you should be allowed to be paid for your views" She actually said that.

Fair play to Piers for pulling her up on that.

You can disagree with her arguments and give your own argument to why she is wrong, but to demand her to be silenced just means you've lost the argument.

This is the first video I've seen of Pearl and she won this debate simply because of her authoritarian opponent.

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690480476472094720

[arista]

In Las Vegas

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F3ZRXm5bgAIt-ei?format=jpg&name=900x900

[arista]

How authoritarian was that blonde?

"I don't think you should be allowed to be paid for your views" She actually said that.

Fair play to Piers for pulling her up on that.

You can disagree with her arguments and give your own argument to why she is wrong, but to demand her to be silenced just means you've lost the argument.

This is the first video I've seen of Pearl and she won this debate simply because of her authoritarian opponent.


No Ava is cool
Perfect balance in the argument


https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1493673549919305734/bsu0fDki_400x400.jpg

[user104658]

Pearl is quite blatantly a fraud who knows what to say to get outrage/attention. It's not even convincing. She's not a good actress.

[arista]

Pearl is quite blatantly a fraud who knows what to say to get outrage/attention. It's not even convincing. She's not a good actress.


I look Forward
to her Live again
on 8PM Piers Morgan Live Show


And who he picks as the other side,
a Tough Female is needed.


But when they know it is Pearl
they may back out?

[Niamh.]

I look Forward

to her Live again

on 8PM Piers Morgan Live Show





And who he picks as the other side,

a Tough Female is needed.





But when they know it is Pearl

they may back out?Why would anyone waste their breath arguing with a person who is clearly just trolling, though?

[arista]

Why would anyone waste their breath arguing with a person who is clearly just trolling, though?


It looks like trolling
but having a Nice Old
Fashioned viewpoint gets her, likes

[Mystic Mock]

Are we going back to the early 10's when trolling was seen as cool?

[arista]

She is Different
not a troll

[Alf]

Pearl is quite blatantly a fraud who knows what to say to get outrage/attention. It's not even convincing. She's not a good actress.Where as St Greta is definitely not a fraud and if you dare say anything negative about her then SB will come on and let you know how sad you are.

"It's ok when we do it"

[Niamh.]

It looks like trolling
but having a Nice Old
Fashioned viewpoint gets her, likes

Oh you think it would be "nice" if women weren't allowed to Vote? Quelle surprise ........

[Niamh.]

She is Different
not a troll

She's most certainly a troll, she doesn't live the way she preaches women should and she deliberately mis-represents stats even when she's been shown to know that they're wrong (eg. claiming more women are obese in the USA than men, someone actually proved to her that was a lie, she said she stood corrected but has still claimed that it was true on other interviews afterwards)

[arista]

Oh you think it would be "nice" if women weren't allowed to Vote? Quelle surprise ........


I did not say that,
I like her Spunk

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690795790376075265

[Liam-]

If she wasn’t a troll she’d be married and have kids already rather than being a still single and childless, ‘past her prime’ 26 year old, promoting herself and her career before everything else, the exact thing she claims women should never be

[Niamh.]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690795790376075265

Such an attention seeker, yawn. Well, that's all the attention she's getting from me now

[arista]

If she wasn’t a troll she’d be married and have kids already rather than being a still single and childless, ‘past her prime’ 26 year old, promoting herself and her career before everything else, the exact thing she claims women should never be


She is still young
it is hard in America

[Liam-]

There’s a lot of money to be made in the business of being a contrarian that throws your own people under the bus

[Liam-]

She is still young
it is hard in America

Then she shouldn’t make a career from telling easily manipulated, vulnerable men that women that are exactly like her, are worthless then.

If I believe, even for a second, that she believed even the smallest amount of the nonsense she comes out with, I’d feel sorry for her, because the bile she spouts for money, screams of a deeply unhappy and insecure person, fortunately she’s just spoilt, privileged daddy’s girl who’s running the grift of the current time

[arista]

Then she shouldn’t make a career from telling easily manipulated, vulnerable men that women that are exactly like her, are worthless then.

If I believe, even for a second, that she believed even the smallest amount of the nonsense she comes out with, I’d feel sorry for her, because the bile she spouts for money, screams of a deeply unhappy and insecure person, fortunately she’s just spoilt, privileged daddy’s girl who’s running the grift of the current time


Valid Response

Slick Liam

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690873603884298240

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1690873603884298240

couple of stunnaz

[Mystic Mock]

She is Different
not a troll

I seriously hope that you're wrong.

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1691340075118862336

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1691347920929341440

Thats a bit rude
Hannah.

[user104658]

Where as St Greta is definitely not a fraud and if you dare say anything negative about her then SB will come on and let you know how sad you are.

"It's ok when we do it"

What imaginary land do you live in where I give a stuff about Greta Thunberg? :joker:.

I'll let you know how sad you are if you're making unrelated personal attacks on young women because yes that's a saddo thing for a middle aged individual to be spending their days doing.

I'll let you know that I think you're dumb as a sack of bricks if you spout nonsense-science and flat-earther conspiracy BS.

You're free to think that Greta is disingenuous though - which is all I've said about Pearl. She's grifting. She makes lots of money by pretending to be the world's biggest PickMe. Is she a "fraud"? :shrug: only in the same way that people like Logan Paul or any other social media "notorious figure" is a fraud... they play a role for content engagement. That's it. I don't find Pearl's acting very convincing but that's also a valid and relevant personal opinion.

I think maybe her popularity/marketability is waning a bit because the Right Wing tide has turned on the likes of Tate, who she leaned heavily on in her content previously ... she seems to be grasping at straws a bit to try to stay relevant, but IMO it's having the opposite effect and people can just see what she's doing at this point.

I don't even blame her is the thing. If I could make a sack of cash being an alt-right shill I'd be marching through Washington DC in a red cap tomorrow morning :joker:.

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1691394735196278785?s=20

[thesheriff443]

What imaginary land do you live in where I give a stuff about Greta Thunberg? :joker:.

I'll let you know how sad you are if you're making unrelated personal attacks on young women because yes that's a saddo thing for a middle aged individual to be spending their days doing.

I'll let you know that I think you're dumb as a sack of bricks if you spout nonsense-science and flat-earther conspiracy BS.

You're free to think that Greta is disingenuous though - which is all I've said about Pearl. She's grifting. She makes lots of money by pretending to be the world's biggest PickMe. Is she a "fraud"? :shrug: only in the same way that people like Logan Paul or any other social media "notorious figure" is a fraud... they play a role for content engagement. That's it. I don't find Pearl's acting very convincing but that's also a valid and relevant personal opinion.

I think maybe her popularity/marketability is waning a bit because the Right Wing tide has turned on the likes of Tate, who she leaned heavily on in her content previously ... she seems to be grasping at straws a bit to try to stay relevant, but IMO it's having the opposite effect and people can just see what she's doing at this point.

I don't even blame her is the thing. If I could make a sack of cash being an alt-right shill I'd be marching through Washington DC in a red cap tomorrow morning :joker:.

It’s a shame you don’t have that same honest opinion that bang on about when it comes to Meghan and Harry’s, another pair grifter’s who are also compulsive liars

Instead you crawl up their back sides with posts aimed at members who have been proven 100 per cent correc in their honest opinions of the pair

When an intelligent man like yourself continues to defend proven liars it’s you that loses all credibility.

[user104658]

It’s a shame you don’t have that same honest opinion that bang on about when it comes to Meghan and Harry’s, another pair grifter’s who are also compulsive liars

Instead you crawl up their back sides with posts aimed at members who have been proven 100 per cent correc in their honest opinions of the pair

When an intelligent man like yourself continues to defend proven liars it’s you that loses all credibility.

"Members who have been proven 100% correct" :laugh:.

I provide a counter-balance to over-the-top, flag-humping royalists. It's not really been necessary since Liz died to be fair, because it turns out the Royalists were mainly Elizabeth Nostalgists ("Good Ol' Days" fans getting misty eyed about the 20th century) and they don't have much time for fat-fingered Chuck, noncey brothers, or Princes getting pegged by the maid. Doing my job for me.

[thesheriff443]

"Members who have been proven 100% correct" :laugh:.

I provide a counter-balance to over-the-top, flag-humping royalists. It's not really been necessary since Liz died to be fair, because it turns out the Royalists were mainly Elizabeth Nostalgists ("Good Ol' Days" fans getting misty eyed about the 20th century) and they don't have much time for fat-fingered Chuck, noncey brothers, or Princes getting pegged by the maid. Doing my job for me.

This has nothing to do with the royals it’s to do with harry and Meghan as people who have lied over and over and manipulated people to get their version of events and by doing so earning millions on the way

You have no defence for their lies but still willing to defend them

[user104658]

This has nothing to do with the royals it’s to do with harry and Meghan as people who have lied over and over and manipulated people to get their version of events and by doing so earning millions on the way

You have no defence for their lies but still willing to defend them

As I explained though Sheriff it's not that I think they're great, I think they're just flawed humans like everyone else on the planet (and thus, absolutely no diffrent to anyone else in the Royal Family). This forum is FULL of support for the "other side" of the Royal Family so I provide an equally over-the-top counterbalance.

I don't care that they've lied their way to millions any more than I care that the other Royals lie through their teeth as well. I also frankly couldn't care less if the lot of them (H&M included) disappeared tomorrow and were never heard from again. Same as Greta, Pearl and whoever else... just people. No more important than you, me or anyone else.

Slightly more important than LT.

[Crimson Dynamo]

:oh:

[Swan]

:oh:

You going to the England women's cricket team Barbie fancy dress party on Sunday while they watch the England women's final LT? :joker: I just had the Women's cricket game on and one of the players was talking about.

This Hannah woman is kinda like that "name 10 books kid" although he's a smarter troll on the whole from what i've seen :laugh:

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1693211619306717416

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1693211619306717416

who gave her that black eye?

[arista]

who gave her that black eye?

An Enemy in USA streets

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/status/1697635428562510127

[arista]

She was Live on GBnewsHD
with a female reporter of sport.

Dissing Female Footballers

She said no one
can name any of them?

[arista]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GAc8NWWXwAAPG8H?format=jpg&name=small

A year ago.