View Full Version : Panicked Omid Scobie - Royal Book Error
arista
28-11-2023, 10:57 PM
'I didn't do it': Panicked Omid Scobie denies
responsibility for error in Dutch copy of Endgame
that 'names the royal racist'
accused of speaking about Archie's
skin colour as sales of controversial book are
halted in Holland and
offending copies pulped
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12801567/Panicked-Omid-Scobie-denies-responsibility-error-Dutch-Endgame-names-royal-racist.html
https://twitter.com/rickeversroyal/status/1729510851059580979?s=51&t=TEfd6ZCZRSCJE7JlCxDb6A
rusticgal
28-11-2023, 11:00 PM
Deliberate….and anything he claims he knows about the Royals only ever came from the mouths of 2 people….but they deny any participation :laugh:
arista
28-11-2023, 11:06 PM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-56d6a93e-a6be-4c96-a326-c0ed1219a591.png
arista
28-11-2023, 11:08 PM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-364744dd-78d4-4be2-95fd-fbe9ae933a24.png
arista
28-11-2023, 11:09 PM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-651d1399-b79d-4b80-a44d-344a40357b18.png
arista
28-11-2023, 11:11 PM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/28/18/78313853-12800721-Omid_Scobie_appears_to_be_in_New_York_today_pictur ed_for_a_serie-a-1_1701197037152.jpg
rusticgal
28-11-2023, 11:12 PM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/28/18/78313853-12800721-Omid_Scobie_appears_to_be_in_New_York_today_pictur ed_for_a_serie-a-1_1701197037152.jpg
This bloke looks like and is a complete Dickhead…
arista
28-11-2023, 11:14 PM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/28/18/78278787-12800721-image-a-4_1701197063415.jpg
arista
28-11-2023, 11:18 PM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/28/10/78303585-12797993-Endgame_which_hits_shelves_today_received_a_damnin g_two_stars_ou-a-3_1701167192449.jpg
[Endgame, which hits shelves today,
received a damning two stars out of five in the Telegraph]
arista
29-11-2023, 12:20 AM
Sky News Text :
[The Daily Express reports that the
Royal Family remains united against
the "mischief making smears" made in
a new book by author Omid Scobie.]
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-61c1f042-c216-4bca-afd9-8bea8117809b.png
arista
29-11-2023, 12:48 AM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/28/22/78347315-0-image-a-30_1701210943196.jpg
Deliberate….and anything he claims he knows about the Royals only ever came from the mouths of 2 people….but they deny any participation :laugh:
As we know, they denied participation in Scobies last book; then Meghan had to admit to the court that she ‘forgot’ about her and Harry sending him briefing notes…
It must be penetrating the thick skulls of Meghan and Harry at last that the world is fed up to the back teeth listening to their endless drivel and grievances and dubious ‘truth’s, so they now have their lackey mouthpiece Scobie doing their dirty work for them. Nothing to do with them, of course. :laugh:
The book in a nutshell, according to the scathing reviews:
The Royals are all bad
Meghan and Harry are paragons of virtue who are never, ever wrong.
As per usual.
The End.
The epitome of a bottom feeder.
The mistake was obviously intentional, hope he ends up in court over it, thats what Harry and Meghan would do
Cherie
29-11-2023, 09:05 AM
Why is he still banging this drum, Harry is on record in his interview with Tom Brady saying neither he or Meghan regarded it as a racist comment
arista
29-11-2023, 09:29 AM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/29/09/78364247-0-image-m-7_1701249036373.jpg
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12803773/Omid-Scobie-Endgame-Dutch-translation-royal-racists.html
arista
29-11-2023, 09:30 AM
Why is he still banging this drum, Harry is on record in his interview with Tom Brady saying neither he or Meghan regarded it as a racist comment
Yes to sell the book
Free publicity
the names are still not available online so there must be a very powerful injunction in place
arista
29-11-2023, 10:02 AM
I assume it is King Charles
Cherie
29-11-2023, 10:10 AM
I assume it is King Charles
or Camilla
it couldn't have been the late queen or prince Philip because only the living can be protected by the courts
Oliver_W
29-11-2023, 10:43 AM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/28/18/78278787-12800721-image-a-4_1701197063415.jpg
While I think "brainwashed" is a strong word, from the way Prince Harry has spoken of therapy and meditation, it doesn't seem to have had much of a positive impact on his wellbeing or relationships with his blood-relatives.
rusticgal
29-11-2023, 11:18 AM
FFS.....asking about Archies skin colour is NOT a Racist comment :nono:
user104658
29-11-2023, 04:22 PM
It could have been any or all of them. Does it matter?
It could have been any or all of them. Does it matter?
of course it matters, the papers have a story to run :nono:
Oliver_W
29-11-2023, 05:55 PM
It could have been any or all of them. Does it matter?
Especially as H&M have (i think?) said they didn't actually regard the comment/question as racist. Nor did most other people. While it's not the best thing to have attributed to oneself, it's not the most damaging.
Piers has revealed the names in the Dutch edition as King Charles and Kate
Piers has revealed the names in the Dutch edition as King Charles and Kate
Well, of course.
arista
30-11-2023, 12:02 AM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-57ae3a36-a3b8-4b23-8350-6c944dc89f59.png
arista
30-11-2023, 02:02 AM
https://video.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2023/11/29/4943305114152356753/964x580_JPG-SINGLE_4943305114152356753.jpg
arista
30-11-2023, 10:11 AM
Omid
now live on this morning ITV1HD
Livia
30-11-2023, 10:26 AM
Meghan made the claim but never heard the comment because it was allegedly said to Harry. Harry denied it to Tom Bradbury saying the royal family isn't racist and blamed the British press. Omid Scobie then names the royals.... and he did, I mean, if the names were never in the manuscript, how could it be mistranslated?
Omid Scobie is fukt.
rusticgal
30-11-2023, 11:29 AM
Meghan made the claim but never heard the comment because it was allegedly said to Harry. Harry denied it to Tom Bradbury saying the royal family isn't racist and blamed the British press. Omid Scobie then names the royals.... and he did, I mean, if the names were never in the manuscript, how could it be mistranslated?
Omid Scobie is fukt.
I read somewhere that the names were originally in the transcript and he had them removed but they somehow (deliberately) didnt get removed from the Dutch edition :shrug:
Whilst Meghan was never part of these 'racist' conversations she put the accusations out there...Harry kept quiet until his interview with Tom Bradbury where he denied it was a racist comment...This Scobie bloke has deliberately spill names to get the book promoted and Harry and Meghan have got their revenge on Charles and Kate...because if it wasn't for them the names wouldn't be out there.
everyone knows it was an intentional dirty trick. If the names were never there, they wouldn't be in the book. The excuse is laughably bad
I assume it is King Charles
Yep
Charlie Boy and Kate
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Whilst Meghan was never part of these 'racist' conversations she put the accusations out there...
Harry kept quiet until his interview with Tom Bradbury where he denied it was a racist comment...This Scobie bloke has deliberately spill names to get the book promoted and Harry and Meghan have got their revenge on Charles and Kate....
Sounds like basic damage limitation from Harry ..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
FFS.....asking about Archies skin colour is NOT a Racist comment :nono:
Mmmmm
Depends on the context and the tone of voice ..
I don’t recall all the details but I thought it was asked before he was born ..
So maybe something like that..
“ what colour is this baby gonna be ? “
To me that would be hurtful and racist .
The suggestion with that example is that it’s a negative to be non white and that would be horrendous and extremely hurtful to the recipient.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Cherie
30-11-2023, 02:12 PM
Mmmmm
Depends on the context and the tone of voice ..
I don’t recall all the details but I thought it was asked before he was born ..
So maybe something like that..
“ what colour is this baby gonna be ? “
To me that would be hurtful and racist .
The suggestion with that example is that it’s a negative to be non white and that would be horrendous and extremely hurtful to the recipient.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Is it really any different to speculating if the baby will have red hair or brown eyes or whatever, it really isn't
Is it really any different to speculating if the baby will have red hair or brown eyes or whatever, it really isn't
Well nobody cares if you have blue eyes or brown hair ..
Sadly loads of people (far , far too many) do have issues with skin colour ..
I can definitely see Charley boy asking that question with a negative tone in his voice .
Imagine his horror of having a non white child in his royal photos ..
arista
30-11-2023, 02:55 PM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/11/30/01/78400947-0-image-a-44_1701309242264.jpg
Cherie
30-11-2023, 03:04 PM
Well nobody cares if you have blue eyes or brown hair ..
Sadly loads of people (far , far too many) do have issues with skin colour ..
I can definitely see Charley boy asking that question with a negative tone in his voice .
Imagine his horror of having a non white child in his royal photos ..
It has come from Harrys own mouth that the family are not racist, if that is not good enough for you not sure what is
Glenn.
30-11-2023, 03:21 PM
Well well well. KKKate aye? The reports of her being a generally awful person to Meghan don’t seem that far fetched anymore.
It has come from Harrys own mouth that the family are not racist, if that is not good enough for you not sure what is
He was probably protecting his family or maybe he was warned off / threatened financially ..
Who knows ..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
He was probably protecting his family or maybe he was warned off / threatened financially ..
Who knows ..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
unlikely given all the other sh!t he has come out with
Oliver_W
30-11-2023, 03:37 PM
Well nobody cares if you have blue eyes or brown hair ..
Sadly loads of people (far , far too many) do have issues with skin colour ..
I can definitely see Charley boy asking that question with a negative tone in his voice .
Imagine his horror of having a non white child in his royal photos ..
Meghan is white-passing to the point you wouldn't know she was meant to be anything else if she didn't talk about it. There's no way anyone was "worrying" about the royal photos being "ruined" by her genetic contribution.
Meghan is white-passing to the point you wouldn't know she was meant to be anything else if she didn't talk about it. There's no way anyone was "worrying" about the royal photos being "ruined" by her genetic contribution.
The photo reference wasn’t a serious point … you get the idea though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Oliver_W
30-11-2023, 03:43 PM
The photo reference wasn’t a serious point … you get the idea though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Yes I did get that it was an illustrative example.
Meghan is white-passing to the point you wouldn't know she was meant to be anything else if she didn't talk about it. There's no way anyone was "worrying" about the royal photos being "ruined" by her genetic contribution.
Really ?
I thought it was accepted that she looks mixed race ?
It’s a beautiful look as well , many of the most stunningly beautiful women around are mixed .
I haven’t got a clue about her parents or family genetics
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Oliver_W
30-11-2023, 03:45 PM
No-one with eyes would deny she's beautiful.
Well well well. KKKate aye? The reports of her being a generally awful person to Meghan don’t seem that far fetched anymore.
Not you still believing the BS that comes out of Meghan’s mouth, passed on via her cronies to her mouthpiece Scobie. Oh dear...:hehe:
They really need a reaction I suppose from the palace. It's always been like a reality series that is being scripted almost exclusively through PR maneuvers and other minions. Hollywood media and reality TV have slowly been merging into a business model that exhalts alternative reality over substance almost solely through subjective means. So it's no surprise they're trying to work off of that model, but it needs drama to actually thrive. They need the counter response so that they can continue to make it out it to be something it probably really isn't in the grand scheme (ie something they can manipulate and attach suddenly new details to with purported contexts...)... if they give any kind of response, they lose. The media will get their story by whatever means. If all that's left to milk is anti-H&M drama, then that's where it will all go... none of it is an honest business and the ones "blasting" the royals probably wouldn't have liked them to begin with and will believe anything negative, so I doubt it actually changes their ability to survive? (I feel like they should know this)
rusticgal
30-11-2023, 08:36 PM
Mmmmm
Depends on the context and the tone of voice ..
I don’t recall all the details but I thought it was asked before he was born ..
So maybe something like that..
“ what colour is this baby gonna be ? “
To me that would be hurtful and racist .
The suggestion with that example is that it’s a negative to be non white and that would be horrendous and extremely hurtful to the recipient.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It’s something Black people themselves speculate when a white person is the spouse….
Excellent article:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12802399/Prince-harry-meghan-deny-claims-omid-scobie-book-endorse.html
SARAH VINE: Where DO Harry and Meghan stand in relation to this puppet of theirs?
…..Either the Duke and Duchess denounce this effluent and its source, Scobie, or the general public on both sides of the Atlantic will have no choice but to conclude that, in the parlance of U.S. political campaigns (and make no mistake, this is political), they fully endorse Scobie's message.
Why they would associate themselves — even tacitly — with such a person is anyone's guess. Perhaps because, having attacked the Royal Family in a full- frontal assault via their interview with Oprah Winfrey, their Netflix documentary and Harry's memoir, Spare, the world still appears somewhat sceptical of their one-sided account.
Maybe Scobie's book is one last throw of the Sussex dice, a desperate — and increasingly hysterical — attempt to reclaim the narrative in the War of the Windsors, which in recent months has made them seem increasingly surplus to requirements….etc..
Glenn.
30-11-2023, 10:19 PM
Not you still believing the BS that comes out of Meghan’s mouth, passed on via her cronies to her mouthpiece Scobie. Oh dear...:hehe:
Just doing what you do Jet. Piece together reports and as they seem to line up pretty well with KKKates behaviour towards Meghan then I can’t see it any other way.
Always knew the veil would fall. Tut tut.
Jordan.
30-11-2023, 10:35 PM
Not you still believing the BS that comes out of Meghan’s mouth, passed on via her cronies to her mouthpiece Scobie. Oh dear...:hehe:
Like you wouldn't be frothing if this was another book painting H&M as the villains :joker:
Great to see KKKate finally exposed!
we only have glimpses of what these people are like behind closed doors. The speculation generated from a statement already walked back by H&M is just such an almighty waste of time :laugh:
Cherie
30-11-2023, 10:44 PM
looks like the Palace have finally had enough....nothing is off the table including legal action..how ironic :laugh:
rusticgal
30-11-2023, 10:49 PM
Great to see KKKate finally exposed!
Only because you want to believe those words were spoken in that context…:laugh:
Glenn.
30-11-2023, 11:27 PM
It’s amazing to see them all scurrying around making excuses for the racists
rusticgal
01-12-2023, 12:02 AM
It’s amazing to see them all scurrying around making excuses for the racists
….and the racist comment was?…
Just doing what you do Jet. Piece together reports and as they seem to line up pretty well with KKKates behaviour towards Meghan then I can’t see it any other way.
Always knew the veil would fall. Tut tut.
If it is true that Kate wasn’t all over MeMeMeghan like the narcissist MeMeMeghan expected, it just shows she was way ahead of everyone else in sussing out what MeMeMeghan was like and distanced herself, much like the majority who now have her measure are doing. :shrug:
we only have glimpses of what these people are like behind closed doors. The speculation generated from a statement already walked back by H&M is just such an almighty waste of time :laugh:
I only knew this happened because you said something here. I'm a part-time royal watcher in a sense, but mostly just listening to things in passing while running through chores... I'd thought the Harry & Meghan saga had run its course once all the book deals and other opportunities had passed. :shrug:
I only knew this happened because you said something here. I'm a part-time royal watcher in a sense, but mostly just listening to things in passing while running through chores... I'd thought the Harry & Meghan saga had run its course once all the book deals and other opportunities had passed. :shrug:
it has run it's course, it's just the media try and light a fire under it every month or 2 to see if they can get some traction :laugh:
Mystic Mock
01-12-2023, 04:49 AM
As we know, they denied participation in Scobies last book; then Meghan had to admit to the court that she ‘forgot’ about her and Harry sending him briefing notes…
It must be penetrating the thick skulls of Meghan and Harry at last that the world is fed up to the back teeth listening to their endless drivel and grievances and dubious ‘truth’s, so they now have their lackey mouthpiece Scobie doing their dirty work for them. Nothing to do with them, of course. :laugh:
The book in a nutshell, according to the scathing reviews:
The Royals are all bad
Meghan and Harry are paragons of virtue who are never, ever wrong.
As per usual.
The End.
Tbf this Scobie guy is writing it from Harry & Meghan's POV, so of course they're going to view themselves as in the right in all of these situations.
Mystic Mock
01-12-2023, 04:53 AM
FFS.....asking about Archies skin colour is NOT a Racist comment :nono:
I mean it kind of is.
Why would anyone ask what the baby's skin colour is going to be? Just looking at the parents 99.99% of the time should be the clue.:laugh:
Mystic Mock
01-12-2023, 04:58 AM
Is it really any different to speculating if the baby will have red hair or brown eyes or whatever, it really isn't
It's different tbf.
Because only a very tiny percentage of people would ask about hair colour or eye colour with any malice.
Mystic Mock
01-12-2023, 05:01 AM
It’s something Black people themselves speculate when a white person is the spouse….
But black people can be racist as well.
It's different tbf.
Because only a very tiny percentage of people would ask about hair colour or eye colour with any malice.
how do you know there was any malice in what was said? Both H & M explicitly said that the royals were not being racist
Jordan.
01-12-2023, 07:16 AM
If it is true that Kate wasn’t all over MeMeMeghan like the narcissist MeMeMeghan expected, it just shows she was way ahead of everyone else in sussing out what MeMeMeghan was like and distanced herself, much like the majority who now have her measure are doing. :shrug:
KKKate was wary of Meghan from day 1 because she saw someone naturally charismatic come into the fold that would show her up as the dull bumbling fool she is.
Cherie
01-12-2023, 07:26 AM
It's different tbf.
Because only a very tiny percentage of people would ask about hair colour or eye colour with any malice.
How do you know it was said with malice? it could have been said in a jokey way, pre MeMeMeghan Harry had a good relationship with his father and Kate? when Harry was asked about the comment point blank by Tom Bradby Harry denied they said it was racist and that it was the papers made that up....look it up for yourself
Glenn.
01-12-2023, 07:30 AM
It’s something Black people themselves speculate when a white person is the spouse….
It wasn’t the speculation that’s the issue. It was the “concern” for the skin colour. There were concerns what colour he would be and therein lies your racism
arista
01-12-2023, 08:13 AM
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/15657/production/_131893678_express-nc.png.webp
arista
01-12-2023, 08:18 AM
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/2E3F/production/_131893811_dailymail-nc.png.webp
arista
01-12-2023, 08:19 AM
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/106A7/production/_131893276_metro-nc.png.webp
James
01-12-2023, 08:45 AM
Omid's going to be a Celebrity Big Brother housemate, isn't he?
…:laugh:…maybe Harry/Meghan/Charles/Kate/William will become members and post…
arista
01-12-2023, 09:06 AM
Omid's going to be a Celebrity Big Brother housemate, isn't he?
Yes a Deal with ITV
is set up.
Oliver_W
01-12-2023, 09:15 AM
It wasn’t the speculation that’s the issue. It was the “concern” for the skin colour. There were concerns what colour he would be and therein lies your racism
Where was it said they expressed concern?
Omid's going to be a Celebrity Big Brother housemate, isn't he?
Link ??
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
James
01-12-2023, 12:30 PM
Link ??
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Just my semi-serious speculation.
rusticgal
01-12-2023, 12:38 PM
It wasn’t the speculation that’s the issue. It was the “concern” for the skin colour. There were concerns what colour he would be and therein lies your racism
Meghan's words...someone who told 17 untruths in that one interview and even lied in court.
Meghan's words...someone who told 17 untruths in that one interview and even lied in court.
That doesn’t mean that EVERYTHING she utters is a mistruth or a lie ..
I can definitely imagine that sentence being uttered by someone at the palace ..
I mean just look at their track record of massive gaffs over the years ..
It why very few take the royal family seriously
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
rusticgal
01-12-2023, 04:15 PM
That doesn’t mean that EVERYTHING she utters is a mistruth or a lie ..
I can definitely imagine that sentence being uttered by someone at the palace ..
I mean just look at their track record of massive gaffs over the years ..
It why very few take the royal family seriously
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Well considering she implied it to Oprah and then Harry later claimed it wasn't (and he should know since he was there and she wasn't) only goes to show she lied...:shrug:
rusticgal
01-12-2023, 04:20 PM
That doesn’t mean that EVERYTHING she utters is a mistruth or a lie ..
If you can go on National TV and mislead the public with a string of lies....if you can go into a Court of Justice under oath and lie....why should anyone ever want to believe a single thing that comes out of her mouth...
Glenn.
01-12-2023, 05:51 PM
Seem like people need to take their tinted glasses off and realise KKKate isn’t as wonderful as you hopelessly think
KKKate was wary of Meghan from day 1 because she saw someone naturally charismatic come into the fold that would show her up as the dull bumbling fool she is.
You got that the wrong way round Jordan. :hehe:
Odd then how the ‘fool’ Kate is respected and admired by the public and all those she works with, and is described by insiders from the various palaces (The Times) as “a clever, smart, determined woman who is quite literally the power behind the throne”!! -
meanwhile the ‘charismatic’ MeMeMeghan is seen as a quitter, a laughing stock, insincere and a pathological liar - and was even described by a top Spotify exec who worked with her as a ‘useless grifter’.
Kate is easy to like long - term. MeMeMeghans initial pushy and gushy effusiveness quickly becomes grating, and she just isn’t.
But each to their own of course as to what qualities they look up to in their public figures. :shrug:
Seem like people need to take their tinted glasses off and realise KKKate isn’t as wonderful as you hopelessly think
You are hilarious Glenn :laugh:
When it comes to MeMeMeghan, tinted glasses aren't for you - you are totally blindfolded. :laugh:
Glenn.
01-12-2023, 06:55 PM
The delusion is real. These haters really will defend anything as long as it goes against Meghan.
I’m just glad to see the truth finally coming to light. The whole family and its ways need to be abolished. They are good for nothing
rusticgal
01-12-2023, 07:00 PM
Seem like people need to take their tinted glasses off and realise KKKate isn’t as wonderful as you hopelessly think
Because Meghan and scoobie said so…:laugh:
The delusion is real. These haters really will defend anything as long as it goes against Meghan.
I’m just glad to see the truth finally coming to light. The whole family and its ways need to be abolished. They are good for nothing
Would you like them to quit all their charity work? They could be more useful like MeMeMeghan and go to Katy Perry, Taylor Swift and Beyonce concerts and alert the paps on trips to fancy restaurants. :laugh:
Don't forget the award ceremonies with meaningless titles
Don't forget the award ceremonies with meaningless titles
:thumbs: :hee:
rusticgal
01-12-2023, 07:46 PM
Don't forget the award ceremonies with meaningless titles
Then the catastrophic car chases….oops another lie :hehe:
Scobie is a Scottish name.. is he really THAT racist
arista
02-12-2023, 06:50 PM
This was Thursdays Front page
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-23b8387d-59e2-4a7b-a96f-bd080a0db429.png
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 06:56 PM
how do you know there was any malice in what was said? Both H & M explicitly said that the royals were not being racist
Because why would you ask that question when the family already knows what Meghan looks like.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what colour skin a child of H & M will have, so there's only one intention as to why that question would be asked and it begins with an R and ends with a T.
rusticgal
02-12-2023, 06:58 PM
This was Thursdays Front page
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-23b8387d-59e2-4a7b-a96f-bd080a0db429.png
Wonder where those details come from….:whistle:
rusticgal
02-12-2023, 07:01 PM
Because why would you ask that question when the family already knows what Meghan looks like.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what colour skin a child of H & M will have, so there's only one intention as to why that question would be asked and it begins with an R and ends with a T.
Well both Archie and Lilly look predominantly white… I know a mixed race couple who have had 2 sets of twins and in both cases one twin was white and the other mixed race.
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 07:10 PM
You got that the wrong way round Jordan. :hehe:
Odd then how the ‘fool’ Kate is respected and admired by the public and all those she works with, and is described by insiders from the various palaces (The Times) as “a clever, smart, determined woman who is quite literally the power behind the throne”!! -
meanwhile the ‘charismatic’ MeMeMeghan is seen as a quitter, a laughing stock, insincere and a pathological liar - and was even described by a top Spotify exec who worked with her as a ‘useless grifter’.
Kate is easy to like long - term. MeMeMeghans initial pushy and gushy effusiveness quickly becomes grating, and she just isn’t.
But each to their own of course as to what qualities they look up to in their public figures. :shrug:
Didn't the Media dislike Kate before Meghan came along?:laugh:
Plus it's funny to me how both Kate & Meghan get so much attention for William & Harry's dislike of each other.:joker:
What colour was the baby?
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 07:19 PM
This was Thursdays Front page
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-23b8387d-59e2-4a7b-a96f-bd080a0db429.png
That admittedly is in poor taste.
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 07:23 PM
Well both Archie and Lilly look predominantly white… I know a mixed race couple who have had 2 sets of twins and in both cases one twin was white and the other mixed race.
I get that mixed race children can have lighter or darker shades of skin colour depending on the genetics of the parents, I do get that tbf.
I just don't get why that question would be asked, especially when knowing what Harry & Meghan both look like, the answer is going to be mixed race regardless of if the child looks a certain way.
rusticgal
02-12-2023, 07:42 PM
I get that mixed race children can have lighter or darker shades of skin colour depending on the genetics of the parents, I do get that tbf.
I just don't get why that question would be asked, especially when knowing what Harry & Meghan both look like, the answer is going to be mixed race regardless of if the child looks a certain way.
But if you look at them neither of them look mixed race…in fact Lily looks very fair skinned….but there was always a chance the children could have looked a lot darker in their skin tone…of course they are still Mixed Race but the curiosity was about their skin tone and what it would be.
It was simply curiosity that has been turned into a Racist comment….later backtracked by Harry.
Didn't the Media dislike Kate before Meghan came along?:laugh:
NO, where on earth did you get that from? Why would they dislike her?
Plus it's funny to me how both Kate & Meghan get so much attention for William & Harry's dislike of each other.:joker:
Given all that transpired since Meghan's arrival on the scene, I don't understand what you mean here...:conf:
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 08:40 PM
What colour was the baby?
It was called yellow
Your skinnnnn, oh yeah your skin & bones
Turnnnnn innnn to something beautiful
Also we need to add an EastEnders duff duff to this plot twist.
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 08:43 PM
NO, where on earth did you get that from? Why would they dislike her?
I'm sure some of the Media used to find her "boring and robotic" for William back in the day.
Granted I don't think it was as widespread amongst the Media as it has been with Meghan, but I'm pretty sure that some of the Media never used to be as kind to Kate in the past compared to how they treat her now.
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 08:45 PM
But if you look at them neither of them look mixed race…in fact Lily looks very fair skinned….but there was always a chance the children could have looked a lot darker in their skin tone…of course they are still Mixed Race but the curiosity was about their skin tone and what it would be.
It was simply curiosity that has been turned into a Racist comment….later backtracked by Harry.
Maybe it's just me, but I have never heard anyone try and guess the skin tone of a child before.
I'm used to hair colour or eye colour, but never skin tone.
Mystic Mock
02-12-2023, 08:47 PM
Given all that transpired since Meghan's arrival on the scene, I don't understand what you mean here...:conf:
My point being that Kate & Meghan are getting more attention and criticism over the fact that William & Harry have issues with each other.
Oliver_W
02-12-2023, 08:57 PM
Plus it's funny to me how both Kate & Meghan get so much attention for William & Harry's dislike of each other.:joker:
It's either infantalising, by suggesting their mummywives made all the decisions for them, or suggesting the women are bitches for causing and encouraging the rift.
smudgie
02-12-2023, 09:03 PM
Maybe it's just me, but I have never heard anyone try and guess the skin tone of a child before.
I'm used to hair colour or eye colour, but never skin tone.
I have.
We have a few generations of mixed race in our family.
My daughter’s partner is mixed race.
I don’t think it’s any different wondering how the babies will look, hair, eyes, who they resemble etc.:shrug:
I'm sure some of the Media used to find her "boring and robotic" for William back in the day.
Granted I don't think it was as widespread amongst the Media as it has been with Meghan, but I'm pretty sure that some of the Media never used to be as kind to Kate in the past compared to how they treat her now.
I can't say I've ever seen the media calling Kate boring and robotic - Ive seen it here from some on BB though.
The media did use to call her waity Katey because William took so long to propose to her.
Glenn.
02-12-2023, 11:59 PM
The thing the haters seem to be deliberately misunderstanding is what actually happened. There were no wonderings about the skin colour of the baby. There were CONCERNS.
You have to be a certain kind of stupid to not understand why that IS racist.
thesheriff443
03-12-2023, 12:07 AM
The thing the haters seem to be deliberately misunderstanding is what actually happened. There were no wonderings about the skin colour of the baby. There were CONCERNS.
You have to be a certain kind of stupid to not understand why that IS racist.
You have to be stupid if you can’t understand that the father of the child in question was asked are the people that asked the question, ie, his family racist?
And his reply was no they are not.
So if harry says his family are not racists it couldn’t have be a racist comment
It's either infantalising, by suggesting their mummywives made all the decisions for them, or suggesting the women are bitches for causing and encouraging the rift.
Meghan obviously played a part in causing and encouraging thr rift but remember that Kate tried to bring the brothers together at Prince Philips funeral.
arista
03-12-2023, 12:11 AM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-95ae615c-44e9-4522-aa1e-9a04e9b20d1e.jpeg
Oliver_W
03-12-2023, 12:12 AM
The thing the haters seem to be deliberately misunderstanding is what actually happened. There were no wonderings about the skin colour of the baby. There were CONCERNS.
You have to be a certain kind of stupid to not understand why that IS racist.
Where was it said there were concerns?
arista
03-12-2023, 12:13 AM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-a88591ab-d05f-46d2-ab79-90404a2ef8c9.jpeg
arista
03-12-2023, 12:15 AM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/12/02/20/78509009-0-image-a-23_1701549923210.jpg
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12818383/Harry-Meghan-excluded-high-society-wedding-childhood-friend-Hugh-Grosvenor-William-Kate-invited-latest-sign-Royal-rift-two-brothers-revealed-groom-Archies-godfather.html
arista
03-12-2023, 12:16 AM
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-41e81ea5-19e6-42af-9a78-e2edbf32da88.jpeg
Mystic Mock
03-12-2023, 04:45 AM
It's either infantalising, by suggesting their mummywives made all the decisions for them, or suggesting the women are bitches for causing and encouraging the rift.
They are the common accusations flung at them.
And look maybe they are to blame for Harry & William's falling out, but if we're going to go with Harry's words, then he at the very least has had issues with William for awhile.
Mystic Mock
03-12-2023, 04:48 AM
I have.
We have a few generations of mixed race in our family.
My daughter’s partner is mixed race.
I don’t think it’s any different wondering how the babies will look, hair, eyes, who they resemble etc.:shrug:
Fair enough.
I suppose it depends on how it's being said I suppose.
It's just I've personally never heard of this kind of conversation before, so to me it is a bit odd.
Mystic Mock
03-12-2023, 04:52 AM
The thing the haters seem to be deliberately misunderstanding is what actually happened. There were no wonderings about the skin colour of the baby. There were CONCERNS.
You have to be a certain kind of stupid to not understand why that IS racist.
Well we know that the Royal Family in this country traditionally don't have many mixed race children in it's lineage, so it is probably a culture shock to some of them.
Not that having concerns about the skin colour would make it okay in any walk of life tbf, but I'm guessing that's where the two individuals in question might've stumbled onto such a minefield.
The only people that are making anything of this is the media, trying to make a story
The only people that are making anything of this is the media, trying to make a story
If the comments WERE made and it is entirely feasible then it IS a story .. a massive one as well
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
rusticgal
03-12-2023, 09:27 AM
If the comments WERE made and it is entirely feasible then it IS a story .. a massive one as well
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You will never know what happened...Meghan quoted words that made it sound Racist in the interview with Oprah...the Royals claimed 'recollections may vary'. Harry denied it was a Racist comment.
Believe the Royals and Harry...or believe Meghan who is known for her untruths.
You will never know what happened...Meghan quoted words that made it sound Racist in the interview with Oprah...the Royals claimed 'recollections may vary'. Harry denied it was a Racist comment.
Believe the Royals and Harry...or believe Meghan who is known for her untruths.
Harry said he felt that it wasn’t said in a racially way that . In effect, confirming it was said .. and it’s understandable to protect the family’s name
The meaning behind the comment is open to translation as we have shown in this very thread
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
rusticgal
03-12-2023, 10:17 AM
Harry said he felt that it wasn’t said in a racially way that . In effect, confirming it was said .. and it’s understandable to protect the family’s name
The meaning behind the comment is open to translation as we have shown in this very thread
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Well Harry was part of the conversation...he has said it was not said in a Racial way...end of story.
Well Harry was part of the conversation...he has said it was not said in a Racial way...end of story.
Why ?
That’s his take and it’s probably biased for so many possible reasons ..
If we were all sat round talking in a similar situation.. and someone said that .. I guarantee that there would be some very questioning looks from the others .
Remember that wasn’t a normal situation and they are far from normal people . Meghan was completely outnumbered .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Well we know that the Royal Family in this country traditionally don't have many mixed race children in it's lineage,
They do actually. King George 3rd's wife Charlotte was mixed race, directly descended from a Black branch of the Portuguese royal house. They had 15 children.
They do actually. King George 3rd's wife Charlotte was mixed race, directly descended from a Black branch of the Portuguese royal house. They had 15 children.
Interesting
What col…. Oh wait .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Fair enough.
I suppose it depends on how it's being said I suppose.
It's just I've personally never heard of this kind of conversation before, so to me it is a bit odd.
I know quite a few different race couples and they all wondered what skin tone their babies would have. There is nothing odd about it, it's perfectly normal and no different from wondering what colour eyes or hair etc, as others have already said.
Livia
03-12-2023, 03:13 PM
They do actually. King George 3rd's wife Charlotte was mixed race, directly descended from a Black branch of the Portuguese royal house. They had 15 children.
Any ancestor of Queen Charlotte who may have been black would have lived at least 15 generations - or about 300 years - before she was born. And there is much conjecture among historians whether or not the claims she had a black ancestor are true.
Any ancestor of Queen Charlotte who may have been black would have lived at least 15 generations - or about 300 years - before she was born. And there is much conjecture among historians whether or not the claims she had a black ancestor are true.
An interesting article about this:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/12/race-monarchy
Was this Britain's first black queen?
I know quite a few different race couples and they all wondered what skin tone their babies would have. There is nothing odd about it, it's perfectly normal and no different from wondering what colour eyes or hair etc, as others have already said.
Your scenario/s are entirely different to the toxic one we’re discussing though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Glenn.
03-12-2023, 05:41 PM
Your scenario/s are entirely different to the toxic one we’re discussing though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It’s like he’s deliberately missing out the bit where they were concerned.
rusticgal
03-12-2023, 05:50 PM
It’s like he’s deliberately missing out the bit where they were concerned.
Well the conversation was with Harry…if anyone had said they were “concerned about the colour of Archie’s skin”…Harry would have addressed it…he has never claimed the conversation was Racial in fact he has denied it….it was only Meghan that implied it was racial and she wasn’t even there…pick the bones out of that.
Well the conversation was with Harry…if anyone had said they were “concerned about the colour of Archie’s skin”…Harry would have addressed it…he has never claimed the conversation was Racial in fact he has denied it….it was only Meghan that implied it was racial and she wasn’t even there…pick the bones out of that.
Harry would naturally defend his family when he realised the size of storm brewing.
He could have even been pressurised in some way or other
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
rusticgal
03-12-2023, 06:19 PM
Harry would naturally defend his family when he realised the size of storm brewing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
He has done nothing but slag them off since he left the fold :smug:
Oliver_W
03-12-2023, 06:46 PM
Your scenario/s are entirely different to the toxic one we’re discussing though
It’s like he’s deliberately missing out the bit where they were concerned.
Where was it said that concern was expressed?
Harry would naturally defend his family when he realised the size of storm brewing.
He could have even been pressurised in some way or other
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
He didn't defend them when the storm was brewing, he let it all happen and it was a whole 2 years later when doing his interviews for 'Spare' that he said they weren't racist.
He would naturally defend his family? Jeez, as Rusti said, he was slagging them off continuously during those 2 years. :notimpressed:
The onus is on Harry to clear it all up, but he won't because he seems to want his dad to squirm. Which is ****ed up from whatever angle you view it
That doesn’t mean that EVERYTHING she utters is a mistruth or a lie ..
I can definitely imagine that sentence being uttered by someone at the palace
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I don’t believe for a moment that any senior members of the Royal family made any racist remarks (when in all their years they have been under relentless scrutiny and have never displayed even a hint of racism - quite the contrary!) - and the late Queen Elizabeth stated that ‘recollections may vary’ - a diplomatic and kindly way of saying, amidst all the resulting furore, that Charles’s daughter - in - law was making a mountain out of a molehill.
Yet you prefer to believe Meghan’s version when she told 17 lies in the Oprah interview (and an additional 15 exaggerations) in her proven toxic quest to damage the Monarchy.
Which scenario is the most likely?
But yeah, I don’t know why I bother.
If Meghan herself now admitted she lied, you would say she was pressured into it by the Royal family, much like you said about Harry when he stated that, being part of that family, he knows they aren’t racist.
I don’t believe for a moment that any senior members of the Royal family made any racist remarks (when in all their years they have been under relentless scrutiny and have never displayed even a hint of racism - quite the contrary!) - and the late Queen Elizabeth stated that ‘recollections may vary’ - a diplomatic and kindly way of saying, amidst all the resulting furore, that Charles’s daughter - in - law was making a mountain out of a molehill.
Yet you prefer to believe Meghan’s version when she told 17 lies in the Oprah interview (and an additional 15 exaggerations) in her proven toxic quest to damage the Monarchy.
Which scenario is the most likely?
But yeah, I don’t know why I bother.
If Meghan herself now admitted she lied, you would say she was pressured into it by the Royal family, much like you said about Harry when he stated that, being part of that family, he knows they aren’t racist.
You are making out the Royals are an upstanding family of angels when history shows they are far from it .. there are gaffs going back decades in the public domain just imagine what they’re like behind closed doors
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You are making out the Royals are an upstanding family of angels when history shows they are far from it .. there are gaffs going back decades in the public domain just imagine what they’re like behind closed doors
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I'm making out no such thing. They are fallible human beings like the rest of us - if we were under such continuous scrutiny few of us would fare any better.
There is no evidence whatsoever that the Monarchy is racist - but you seem to really want them to be proved as such. Why?
I'm making out no such thing. They are fallible human beings like the rest of us - if we were under such continuous scrutiny few of us would fare any better.
There is no evidence whatsoever that the Monarchy is racist - but you seem to really want them to be proved as such. Why?
The most notorious of the Prince’s comments was made in 1986 during his first and only state visit to China. Philip met with British university students who were studying Mandarin in Xi’an, telling one of them: “By the time you go back home you’ll have slitty eyes.”
The student, 21-year-old Simon Kirby, explained that the UK students didn’t live with their Chinese counterparts. Philip continued: “So [the Chinese] don’t want to mix with the barbarians.” A comment made in Australia in 2002 to an Indigenous Australian entrepreneur came a close scandalous second. Philip asked: “Do you still throw spears at each other?”
Philip once asked Lord Taylor of Warwick: ‘And what exotic part of the world do you come from?’ That’s because Lord Taylor is black.
When he once visited an electronics factory in Scotland and came across a “messy fuse box”, he exclaimed it looked ‘as though it was put in by an Indian’.”
The late Queen Liz had, for a good period of time, a household ban on hiring staff of colour, making herself exempt from racial equality laws. Due to applied pressures she conceded to employ some as menial servants.
The Queen's chief financial manager told civil servants that "it was not, in fact, the practice to appoint coloured immigrants or foreigners" to clerical roles, but they were allowed to be hired as domestic servants.
Even superficial changes, such as renaming the empire honours awards to make them less offensive, she refused to do.
The perception of the Queen as a harmless, benevolent older woman, hid the insidious racism of the monarchy, both past and present.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20231203/41788af98cb90dc4793ace4d03b35f1c.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
thesheriff443
03-12-2023, 10:20 PM
I'm making out no such thing. They are fallible human beings like the rest of us - if we were under such continuous scrutiny few of us would fare any better.
There is no evidence whatsoever that the Monarchy is racist - but you seem to really want them to be proved as such. Why?
Unfortunately jet you can’t reason with zizu he has shown in other threads, once he gets something in his head it takes over
We all know by now that harry and Meghan not only twisted the truth but blatantly told lies to fit their own agendas
They have made themselves a laughing stock around the world
Oliver_W
03-12-2023, 10:26 PM
when she told 17 lies in the Oprah interview (and an additional 15 exaggerations)
Are they random numbers? Or they verified fact-checks?
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20231203/41788af98cb90dc4793ace4d03b35f1c.jpg
What's that picture meant to prove?
Unfortunately jet you can’t reason with zizu he has shown in other threads, once he gets something in his head it takes over
We all know by now that harry and Meghan not only twisted the truth but blatantly told lies to fit their own agendas
They have made themselves a laughing stock around the world
It’s true I am impulsive/compulsive
Apologies
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
The most notorious of the Prince’s comments was made in 1986 during his first and only state visit to China. Philip met with British university students who were studying Mandarin in Xi’an, telling one of them: “By the time you go back home you’ll have slitty eyes.”
The student, 21-year-old Simon Kirby, explained that the UK students didn’t live with their Chinese counterparts. Philip continued: “So [the Chinese] don’t want to mix with the barbarians.” A comment made in Australia in 2002 to an Indigenous Australian entrepreneur came a close scandalous second. Philip asked: “Do you still throw spears at each other?”
Philip once asked Lord Taylor of Warwick: ‘And what exotic part of the world do you come from?’ That’s because Lord Taylor is black.
When he once visited an electronics factory in Scotland and came across a “messy fuse box”, he exclaimed it looked ‘as though it was put in by an Indian’.”
The late Queen Liz had, for a good period of time, a household ban on hiring staff of colour, making herself exempt from racial equality laws. Due to applied pressures she conceded to employ some as menial servants.
The Queen's chief financial manager told civil servants that "it was not, in fact, the practice to appoint coloured immigrants or foreigners" to clerical roles, but they were allowed to be hired as domestic servants.
Even superficial changes, such as renaming the empire honours awards to make them less offensive, she refused to do.
The perception of the Queen as a harmless, benevolent older woman, hid the insidious racism of the monarchy, both past and present.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You are harking back to a completely different time and generation when people thought nothing of enjoying programmes like ‘the black and white minstrel show’, and comedies like ‘Till death us to part’ and ‘love thy neighbour’ which were full of iffy jokes. It didn’t mean they were necessarily racist.
Harry and Meghan issued a statement soon after the Oprah interview saying that neither Prince Philip nor the Queen had anything to do with the comments they were complaining about.
Have a look at these 2 sites:
https://www.royal.uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-and-the-commonwealth#:~:text=As%20Head%20of%20the%20Common wealth,geographical%20regions%2C%20religions%20and %20cultures.
https://www.princestrustglobal.org/ (Charles’s lifelong passion)
When Charles was the Prince of Wales he got flack for saying that when he became KIng, he didn’t want to be the ‘defender of the faith’ (Christian) but a defender of all faiths.
Royals must be totally crap at being racists. :hee:
Taking heed of what sheriff said about there is no reasoning with you, this is my last attempt to put my points across to you on this subject.
We do agree on other things, so see you around! :wavey:
You are harking back to a completely different time and generation when people thought nothing of enjoying programmes like ‘the black and white minstrel show’, and comedies like ‘Till death us to part’ and ‘love thy neighbour’ which were full of iffy jokes. It didn’t mean they were necessarily racist.
Harry and Meghan issued a statement soon after the Oprah interview saying that neither Prince Philip nor the Queen had anything to do with the comments they were complaining about.
Have a look at these 2 sites:
https://www.royal.uk/queen-elizabeth-ii-and-the-commonwealth#:~:text=As%20Head%20of%20the%20Common wealth,geographical%20regions%2C%20religions%20and %20cultures.
https://www.princestrustglobal.org/ (Charles’s lifelong passion)
When Charles was the Prince of Wales he got flack for saying that when he became KIng, he didn’t want to be the ‘defender of the faith’ (Christian) but a defender of all faiths.
Royals must be totally crap at being racists. :hee:
Taking heed of what sheriff said about there is no reasoning with you, this is my last attempt to put my points across to you on this subject.
We do agree on other things, so see you around! :wavey:
It’s all good .. we all have our differing views on a variety of issues.
Other than Di and Harry I’ve no time for the royals and never will have
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Are they random numbers? Or they verified fact-checks?
The Oprah interview was raked over by journalists and Royal experts and around 16 - 18 lies are the numbers they variously came up with, so people seem to have settled for always saying 17. :hee:
arista
04-12-2023, 11:20 AM
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/12/04/08/78546445-0-image-m-3_1701679735332.jpg
Omid
spill your beans on Celebrity Big Brother ITV1HD
in a month or so.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.