Do you agree with Sharon’s save and replace?

[Benjamin]

Poll coming.

[Ammi]

..yeah, I loved it and her reasoning for saving Zeze but her choices were good…

[Billy]

I was happy for her to put Fern up but not save ZeZe, I think it was quite a calculated decision on her part.

[saiwong]

I think Sharon should have kept BOTH Lauren and Zeezee up for eviction in order to allow the general public decide which side they wish to support

[joeysteele]

Yes She made a good choice.

I expected her to save Louis but as on X Factor, you expect the unexpected from Sharon

[bots]

im glad Zeze was saved

[Redrose]

They ask this on the app but the voting was closed. Wish I could have seen the results. I would have picked Ekin-Su over Fern

[Redrose]

I agree with her save but not her replace.

[HettyLip]

Nominating bland Fern instead of the Brixton loudmouth, whose eyes are every bit as shifty as those of loathsome Louis (the man who frequently and openly snacks on his fingernails and commits other unspeakable acts when poking his fingers into his mouth) suggests that Sharon was not at her best when making this inexplicable choice.
I appeal to BB to provide Louis, this humbug of a man, with a pacifier and a crash course in table manners.
As for awful Zeze, her combative approach to conflict-solving does little to achieve a modicum of harmony and understanding in the BB house,
She is the archetypal troublemaker who needs conflict as others need oxygen.
She is a mugger of social norms

[Kate!]

Sharon’s decision to save and replace holds both merits and drawbacks. While it may demonstrate a proactive approach to improving a situation, (https://storysaver.page/) it could also be perceived as favoritism or bias towards the individual being replaced. The effectiveness of this action depends on various factors such as the rationale behind the decision, transparency in communication, and fairness in execution.

Welcome to the Tibb Forum Micky.