Climate Zealots Harry and Markle FLY in kids photographer for pics

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/19/19/63631887-11333127-Meghan_during_the_California_photoshoot_for_Variet y-a-19_1666202436395.jpg

Meghan Markle hired an expensive top photographer for a family photoshoot with her rarely seen children

Jake Rosenberg, a New York-based photographer, is said to have flown
thousands of miles by plane to California in March to take pictures of Prince
Archie and his sister Princess Lilibet.

Mr Rosenberg has photographed the Duchess several times. His website
claims “his lens has captured the radiance of "talent" such as Meghan
Markle, Oprah Winfrey, Priyanka Chopra, Cindy Crawford, David Beckham,
and Michael B. Jordan, unveiling their authentic personas through his vibrant
imagery” and photoshop.

There are hundreds of such photographers in LA that would not need to fly to
take the pics

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2024/03/21/meghan-prince-harry-archie-lilibet-photos/

Do as I say, not as I do

https://i.insider.com/5d892b8e21214c47196b42d3?width=700

[Cherie]

I wonder how they excuse this?

[Crimson Dynamo]

id imagine the photographer will be submitting raw files to the media?

[Glenn.]

“ is said to have”…..

[Crimson Dynamo]

they are just good friends....

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ec/3c/cd/ec3ccdeed716e573856f974259f4d0c9.jpg

[Jordan.]

The effortless trolling

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/10/19/19/63631887-11333127-Meghan_during_the_California_photoshoot_for_Variet y-a-19_1666202436395.jpg

[user104658]

It was probably a cover-up and they're secretly smuggling Kate out of Europe in the cargo hold. Heroes.

[Maru]

I guess the royals are more openly warring now between website removals and this.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Top comment from the DT

"The photos will be scheduled for release to compete with the Princess of Wales’ return to
public life. The children (if they exist) will likely be blurred and/or pictured in 1/4 view or
seated at kitchen counter, backs to camera, captive audience of Meghan swishing around
the kitchen in an ill-fitting ballgown."

[user104658]

Imagine wanting to preserve the privacy of your children who aren't old enough to agree to fame instead of photoshopping them into an old photo of yourself as a shield from the press. Villains!

[Oliver_W]

Does it really matter?

We already know they're lying hypocrites. I don't think we need regular updates from their Fan Club to know that.

[Gusto Brunt]

I wonder how they excuse this?

By saying we can do whatever we damn want. 🙄

[Glenn.]

Top comment from the DT

"The photos will be scheduled for release to compete with the Princess of Wales’ return to
public life. The children (if they exist) will likely be blurred and/or pictured in 1/4 view or
seated at kitchen counter, backs to camera, captive audience of Meghan swishing around
the kitchen in an ill-fitting ballgown."

“If they exist”

These haters really are bat ****

[jet]

“If they exist”

These haters really are bat ****

They must remind you of the Kate haters and their bat**** crazy conspiracies about her. Yes?

[user104658]

They must remind you of the Kate haters and their bat**** crazy conspiracies about her. Yes?

You're so close to stumbling over the point, and yet, I'm still 100% sure that you won't :joker:.

[Glenn.]

You're so close to stumbling over the point, and yet, I'm still 100% sure that you won't :joker:.

Bless him. He thought he really had something there :joker:

[jet]

You're so close to stumbling over the point, and yet, I'm still 100% sure that you won't :joker:.

Ah, but the difference is I’m not a ‘hater’ and unlike you I don’t deal in bat**** crazy conspiracies like some do such as the Sussex children don’t exist. I stick to the Sussexes own words and actions to comment on. If you would stick to the same principles you might come across as not so unhinged.

[Glenn.]

Bless

[jet]

Bless him. He thought he really had something there :joker:

Bless you. What exactly is it I thought I had? Explain.

[Glenn.]

I don’t think you’d be able to handle the irony

[jet]

I don’t think you’d be able to handle the irony

Try me.

[Crimson Dynamo]

I don’t think you’d be able to handle the irony

like you knew when you posted originally

:joker:

[jet]

like you knew when you posted originally

:joker:

:laugh: Bless him. :pat:

[Glenn.]

That doesn’t even make sense

[Cherie]

Ah, but the difference is I’m not a ‘hater’ and unlike you I don’t deal in bat**** crazy conspiracies like some do such as the Sussex children don’t exist. I stick to the Sussexes own words and actions to comment on. If you would stick to the same principles you might come across as not so unhinged.

That is the nub of if, they are only spoken about when they give us something to speak about, otherwise they remain pretty much forgotten, no one is hounding them with conspiracy theories either

[user104658]

That is the nub of if, they are only spoken about when they give us something to speak about, otherwise they remain pretty much forgotten, no one is hounding them with conspiracy theories either

Hmm like when LT in this very thread was insinuating that Meghan was having an affair with their photographer? That sort of conspiracy theory?

I won't repost my own theory about why he's so paranoid about such things though, it's one of his soft underbelly spots that he reports to the mods. Too close to the bone.

[Cherie]

Hmm like when LT in this very thread was insinuating that Meghan was having an affair with their photographer? That sort of conspiracy theory?

I won't repost my own theory about why he's so paranoid about such things though, it's one of his soft underbelly spots that he reports to the mods. Too close to the bone.

are you seriously conflating LTs tongue in cheek photo with viral conspiracies on X .....okay?

[Glenn.]

No self awareness