meghan Markle launches limited edition Jam, sends to 50 "influencers"

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04/16/08/83693587-13313341-Fashion_designer_Tracy_Robbins_posted_a_picture_of _the_jam_which-a-25_1713251157711.jpg

Meghan Markle has launched the first product from her new business American Riviera Orchard, sending 50 influencers and friends a jar of strawberry jam.

Fashion designer Tracy Robbins and Argentine socialite Delfina Balquier are among those who have posted an image of the product on their Instagram Stories today.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04/16/08/83693585-13313341-Delfina_Balquier_also_posted_a_photo_on_Instagram_ and_said_Straw-a-24_1713251151742.jpg

Fans of Meghan have been left hugely excited by the launch, with one tweeting: 'I don't eat jam that much but for you Meg I'm buying some. In fact hubby and kids will eat them on my behalf.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13313341/Meghan-Markle-American-Riviera-Orchard-product-jam-Prince-Harry.html

[Mystic Mock]

I'm not really a fan of Jam anymore personally.

But good luck to Meghan on her product.

[user104658]

I don't consume refined sugars but I will still buy this jam :flutter:. Looking at finance options now.

[bots]

i'm looking forward to tasting Megan's jam

[rusticgal]

Why has she labelled them '1 of 50'...'10 of 50'.

Perhaps she thinks they are an item of value...limited addition...handmade by a Duchess :joker:

[Crimson Dynamo]

i'm looking forward to tasting Megan's jam

https://content.invisioncic.com/Mrangmedia/emoticons/matron.png

[Beso]

Overpriced tat...the bloody labels even peeling away in that top pick...

[bots]

Overpriced tat...the bloody labels even peeling away in that top pick...

on the second pic they are deliberately holding the label down :laugh:

[Cherie]

Why has she labelled them '1 of 50'...'10 of 50'.

Perhaps she thinks they are an item of value...limited addition...handmade by a Duchess :joker:

Unless the pot stays closed they will grow mould on top if not eaten, maybe its the jar that is the collectors item

[Crimson Dynamo]

From world-leading humanitarian to Greengrocer in a year

how the mighty fall

:laugh2:

[Cherie]

How do you know from the pot what it is, there is no mention of strawberry or jam :laugh:

[Oliver_W]

Wow LT, thanks for keeping is abreast of her latest move, it's handy having a member of her fanclub here to make sure we won't miss anything.

[Swan]

https://img.gifglobe.com/grabs/peepshow/S04E01/gif/N20Uh6c9haIq.gif

[jet]

Strawberry jam - what an innovative idea! :hee:
Coming in the near future - Dog food,coasters,napkin rings, bird seed, gardening gloves and lots more assorted tat!
Is there no end to Marketplace Meghan’s Originality and Authenticity! :smug:

[jet]

https://img.gifglobe.com/grabs/peepshow/S04E01/gif/N20Uh6c9haIq.gif

:laugh:

[hijaxers]

Strawberry jam - what an innovative idea! :hee:
Coming in the near future - Dog food,coasters,napkin rings, bird seed, gardening gloves and lots more assorted tat!
Is there no end to Marketplace Meghan’s Originality and Authenticity! :smug:

Nothing original there and the only authentic thing about this 'tat' will be the $$$$$

[Crimson Dynamo]

:laugh:

That is a classic ep where Jeremey sleeps with Mark's Mother in Law :joker:

[Oliver_W]

Strawberry jam - what an innovative idea! :hee:
Coming in the near future - Dog food,coasters,napkin rings, bird seed, gardening gloves and lots more assorted tat!
Is there no end to Marketplace Meghan’s Originality and Authenticity! :smug:

Not all jam is the same, maybe hers is uniquely delicious in some way :shrug:

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/01/17/21/94226779-0-image-m-2_1737148190680.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14297853/Meghan-Markle-Harry-caregiver-reparenting-Montecito-claims-new-article.html

[Maru]

Wow LT, thanks for keeping is abreast of her latest move, it's handy having a member of her fanclub here to make sure we won't miss anything.

I'm American and unfortunately they don't let you forget here in the States anyway if you follow any kind of online media. They have a hate following for sure. One day our children's children will be studying them in schools and wondering what could have been...?

[Oliver_W]

I'm American and unfortunately they don't let you forget here in the States anyway if you follow any kind of online media. They have a hate following for sure. One day our children's children will be studying them in schools and wondering what could have been...?

They're literally not part of my world unless someone here posts about them :laugh:

[Glenn.]

Same :joker:

The irony is the best thing. The haters make sure they’re in the spotlight. No one else cares.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Vanity Fair did a hit piece on them

Now even they have had enough of the privacy couple

:joker:

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/01/18/11/94238371-14299197-image-a-1_1737200767362.jpg

[arista]

Yes LT
Anger at them..............

https://video.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2025/01/18/353319479158159810/964x580_JPG-SINGLE_353319479158159810.jpg

[Livia]

Strawberry jam - what an innovative idea! :hee:
Coming in the near future - Dog food,coasters,napkin rings, bird seed, gardening gloves and lots more assorted tat!
Is there no end to Marketplace Meghan’s Originality and Authenticity! :smug:

Marmalade next. With oranges!

[arista]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/01/18/11/94227195-14299357-Meghan_Markle_s_friends_have_denied_rumours_that_t he_Duchess_of_-a-3_1737200174645.jpg

Yes Meghan Markle
some will get Angry at you,
Move On

[arista]

[Locals blast 'the Prince and the starlet':
Furious Montecito residents describe
Harry and Meghan as the 'most entitled,
disingenuous people on the planet' - as bombshell
article lays bare couple's California nightmare]


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14297853/Meghan-Markle-Harry-caregiver-reparenting-Montecito-claims-new-article.html


Move On Meg

[Glenn.]

No sources were named in that article I bet

[rusticgal]

No sources were named in that article I bet


Probably because some like their privacy…:hee:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Probably because some like their privacy…:hee:

:joker:

[user104658]

No sources were named in that article I bet

Treather Lumpet, of Los Angeles, Fife.

[Crimson Dynamo]

stooping so low to become "disaster tourists" for likes at the California mismanaged fires

I mean really?

[bots]

really, who gives a crap what the pair get up to, i certainly don't. They aren't even very good scammers

[rusticgal]

really, who gives a crap what the pair get up to, i certainly don't. They aren't even very good scammers


Watching their desperation to remain relevant amuses me…:fan:

[user104658]

Watching their desperation to remain relevant amuses me…:fan:

:shrug: just a path to bitterness really. Sad.

[Glenn.]

The haters just love keeping us updated on their every movement. Ironic considering ‘no one is interested in them”

[user104658]

The haters just love keeping us updated on their every movement. Ironic considering ‘no one is interested in them”

I genuinely would have no clue what Harry and Meghan are up to in 2025, nor would I have since they left the UK, without regular updates from people on TiBB insisting that they're attention seeking and everyone should ignore them :joker:.

[Glenn.]

I genuinely would have no clue what Harry and Meghan are up to in 2025, nor would I have since they left the UK, without regular updates from people on TiBB insisting that they're attention seeking and everyone should ignore them :joker:.

You have to laugh

[rusticgal]

:shrug: just a path to bitterness really. Sad.



That certainly seems to be the path she is taking….:laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

That certainly seems to be the path she is taking….:laugh:

yep

:laugh:

[jet]

Yes LT
Anger at them..............

https://video.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2025/01/18/353319479158159810/964x580_JPG-SINGLE_353319479158159810.jpg

Could M&H get any more disgusting? Trampling over the destruction of peoples lives when the residents themselves weren’t allowed entry to rescue their pets and emergency workers were searching premises for the bodies of fire victims.
There they were, the publicity junkies, complete with 4 bodyguards, a camera crew and a press release to TMZ to record how wonderful they are. What exactly was the purpose of their 17 minute ghoulish visit?
Meghan launched herself on several people with hugs while Harry looked on with a gormless expression. Job done!

[Glenn.]

:joker: :joker: :joker:

So much venom

[Beso]

The haters just love keeping us updated on their every movement. Ironic considering ‘no one is interested in them”

That just translates to.....I cant support them anymore.

[Glenn.]

That just translates to.....I cant support them anymore.

I never did support them, I don’t know them, nor do I care about them. They have no effect on my life.

My issue is with the irrational hatred that is barrelled at them. It’s disturbing to read from people who equally don’t know them or affected by anything they do.

[Glenn.]

Could M&H get any more disgusting? Trampling over the destruction of peoples lives when the residents themselves weren’t allowed entry to rescue their pets and emergency workers were searching premises for the bodies of fire victims.
There they were, the publicity junkies, complete with 4 bodyguards, a camera crew and a press release to TMZ to record how wonderful they are. What exactly was the purpose of their 17 minute ghoulish visit?
Meghan launched herself on several people with hugs while Harry looked on with a gormless expression. Job done!

This being a prime example. So consumed with hatred towards them

[rusticgal]

I never did support them, I don’t know them, nor do I care about them. They have no effect on my life.

My issue is with the irrational hatred that is barrelled at them. It’s disturbing to read from people who equally don’t know them or affected by anything they do.


We are not ‘affected’ by their behaviour just commenting on it. You don’t know Liam Payne but you had a lot to say about him when he passed away…what’s the difference :shrug:

[user104658]

Thread has swiftly become a gruesome trog party as usual :joker: it's nice that some things never change. Nostaligic, almost, in the face of neoliberal Christian oligarchies etc.

A good old Royal H&M "Did you know we HATES 'em??" TiBB thread :flutter:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Thread has swiftly become a gruesome trog party as usual :joker: it's nice that some things never change. Nostaligic, almost, in the face of neoliberal Christian oligarchies etc.

A good old Royal H&M "Did you know we HATES 'em??" TiBB thread :flutter:

IV got it all sussed volume 146

I'm not here for cheap culture war points volume 215


:laugh:

[user104658]

I'm not here for cheap culture war points volume 215


Here for? I reckon it's literally all you get up in the morning for some days., Woke Watch.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Here for? I reckon it's literally all you get up in the morning for some days., Woke Watch.

If it triggers you do don't keep clicking into it..

Simple

[Glenn.]

The irony of being called triggered by someone who is triggered by everything.

[user104658]

If it triggers you do don't keep clicking into it..

Simple

I quite enjoy it, for the cringe humour, you have a strong David Brent vibe recently. I was just pointing out the absurdity of the curator of the "Woke Watch" thread himself, throwing around comments about "cheap culture wars". You do like to jump the shark sometimes.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The irony of being called triggered by someone who is triggered by everything.

I quite enjoy it, for the cringe humour, you have a strong David Brent vibe recently. I was just pointing out the absurdity of the curator of the "Woke Watch" thread himself, throwing around comments about "cheap culture wars". You do like to jump the shark sometimes.

"Yeah I'm not having a go at you, it's just...obviously the best people haven't turned up."

[jet]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/01/17/podcast-staff-needed-therapy-working-with-meghan-reports/

Podcast staff needed therapy after working with Meghan, reports claim
Victoria Ward

Jan 17th

Podcast staff needed “long-term therapy” or took extended breaks from work after working with the Duchess of Sussex, Vanity Fair has claimed.
The magazine recounts a source alleging that the strain Meghan put on her colleagues when things went wrong was “really, really, really awful” and “very painful”.....

…..The high-profile magazine says it spent months speaking to dozens of people who have lived and worked with the Sussexes to establish how their new life has panned out.
The resulting, 8,000-word cover feature paints a picture of a couple whose approach to their new careers in the world of show business has not always been well-received.
Prince Harry is portrayed as a naive, lonely figure who has failed to make any friends and is desperate to reconnect with his family…..

……Meanwhile, the Duchess is portrayed as a ruthless boss who treats those who fail to impress her with contempt.
One person is quoted as saying that this manifested as “undermining”, adding: “It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls-teenager.”

One source told the magazine: “You don’t tell the couple ‘no’,” adding: “I left because I couldn’t live with myself anymore.”

[Glenn.]

Reports claim
Source alleging

[Maru]

They're literally not part of my world unless someone here posts about them :laugh:

I used to watch channels that featured them a lot with royal stuff, but I stopped watching mainly because I don't really care that much about what they're doing (or not doing).

But I think in the US, if anyone is a "celebrity" with any level of fame and living in CA, chances are they will be featured at some point in some headline and spotlighted in every other American news sources as "current" interesting news. If they had not lived in such a place, they'd never be featured... that industry is self-containing. Just move to any area, preferably not CA but not maybe not even NY, and the industry won't really bother them... that's why so many people who want to be famous will live off of ramen to afford to rent there in the hopes to get noticed, because location is so critical. Outside of that area, people just don't care about celebrity. But yeah, unfortunately, other channels with actual news feature them for clicks even though they're not really relevant to US matters... and it's because they live in a spot of the US that is known for being a media petri dish. So even people who don't care still have to hear about them... that's most celebrities, not just Harry or Meghan in the US. The celebrity thing is self-perpetuating... it's not an organic thing :shrug:

[user104658]

I used to watch channels that featured them a lot with royal stuff, but I stopped watching mainly because I don't really care that much about what they're doing (or not doing).

But I think in the US, if anyone is a "celebrity" with any level of fame and living in CA, chances are they will be featured at some point in some headline and spotlighted in every other American news sources as "current" interesting news. If they had not lived in such a place, they'd never be featured... that industry is self-containing. Just move to any area, preferably not CA but not maybe not even NY, and the industry won't really bother them... that's why so many people who want to be famous will live off of ramen to afford to rent there in the hopes to get noticed, because location is so critical. Outside of that area, people just don't care about celebrity. But yeah, unfortunately, other channels with actual news feature them for clicks even though they're not really relevant to US matters... and it's because they live in a spot of the US that is known for being a media petri dish. So even people who don't care still have to hear about them... that's most celebrities, not just Harry or Meghan in the US. The celebrity thing is self-perpetuating... it's not an organic thing :shrug:

I agree in part however you also can't discount the fact that social circles (some of them, of course, horrific social circles; I'm not saying Hollywood is was a happy place) are a huge draw for choice of where to settle. You can say "if people want privacy they can just move elsewhere" but this is a young/new family that now lacks blood-family ties, thus proximity to friends becomes more important.

I know this will be countered with "they chose to cut contact with blood family!"

and

"Hollywood celebrity pals are not good close friends to have!"

Both of which may be true, I personally find the former questionable but I know some people strongly advocate for accepting poor treatment from family "cos it's family", but anyway, this isn't about personal thoughts on the reasons...

All I'm really saying is, I don't think it should be dismissed out-of-hand that the reason "the famous" might end up cluistering like this, might not just be because of "wanting to be noticed and relevant". It's probably at least in part about community. Which humans (as social animals) crave. Whether or not it's a healthy community is not really relevant.

[Kazanne]

We are not ‘affected’ by their behaviour just commenting on it. You don’t know Liam Payne but you had a lot to say about him when he passed away…what’s the difference :shrug:

I agree and dont forget the hatred Boris got when people didnt even know him. the haters lapped that all up as fact.:wavey:

[Cherie]

They are bandwagon jumpers Megs does a podcast on breaking down gender stereotypes and now she has transformed herself into a Trad Wife.... its all very bizarre, the trip to California was a very Royal thing to do....it works here...not so much in the US

[rusticgal]

I agree and dont forget the hatred Boris got when people didnt even know him. the haters lapped that all up as fact.:wavey:


Exactly…it’s a forum for discussion and all of us give our own opinions on public figures we don’t know on a personal level. There is no place on here where your defence is “you don’t know them personally”…it’s a weak and pathetic cop out.

[rusticgal]

They are bandwagon jumpers Megs does a podcast on breaking down gender stereotypes and now she has transformed herself into a Trad Wife.... its all very bizarre, the trip to California was a very Royal thing to do....it works here...not so much in the US


I agree Cherie….they have no relevance in America it just comes across as the photo opportunity it is.

[Maru]

They are bandwagon jumpers Megs does a podcast on breaking down gender stereotypes and now she has transformed herself into a Trad Wife.... its all very bizarre, the trip to California was a very Royal thing to do....it works here...not so much in the US

That's certainly the culture in that part of CA, though. She was raised deeply in that as I recall her father used to work lights. The problem is, she—like Harry—seem to really believe that the hustle of CA life itself trickles down to the masses in an even manner and eventually leads to some magical impression that they can then later turn to long-term success.. that may or may not pan out, as it's a very luck-based system... What doesn't help is poor Harry, his relevance was handed to him via birth. He's never going to be able to fully remake himself and that means he's somewhat pigeonholed. For Meghan, her career however minor was something she did have to work towards, but it was largely down to her father's occupation and being settled in such a small industry of talent so early on that gave her at least the basic skill to social climb... kind of like how the armorer who worked the Rust set (Baldwin shooting) used her father to get her foot in the door... and we know how that worked out. Edit: I wish her father was a bit more honest about his own role in what created the social hungry monster in her... not just the things he paid for, etc.

Online it does seem like bandwagon jumping is a more widespread thing, but in reality, it really does not trickle down to the masses the way that the internet can make Americans appear... it's just sort of there and we have to live with that noise...

I'd wager celebrity appeal has dropped substantially and continues to drop, not just Harry & Meghan's appeal, but the fact that these attention-seeking personalities can be found anywhere trying to hock some goods or services through their "super brand"... they joined that bandwagon way too late, imo. Maybe 15-20 years ago, they might've found a nice niche somewhere before the field became saturated with influencers...

[user104658]

That's certainly the culture in that part of CA, though. She was raised deeply in that as I recall her father used to work lights. The problem is, she—like Harry—seem to really believe that the hustle of CA life itself trickles down to the masses in an even manner and eventually leads to some magical impression that they can then later turn to long-term success.. that may or may not pan out, as it's a very luck-based system... What doesn't help is poor Harry, his relevance was handed to him via birth. He's never going to be able to fully remake himself and that means he's somewhat pigeonholed. For Meghan, her career however minor was something she did have to work towards, but it was largely down to her father's occupation and being settled in such a small industry of talent so early on that gave her at least the basic skill to social climb... kind of like how the armorer who worked the Rust set (Baldwin shooting) used her father to get her foot in the door... and we know how that worked out. Edit: I wish her father was a bit more honest about his own role in what created the social hungry monster in her... not just the things he paid for, etc.

Online it does seem like bandwagon jumping is a more widespread thing, but in reality, it really does not trickle down to the masses the way that the internet can make Americans appear... it's just sort of there and we have to live with that noise...

I'd wager celebrity appeal has dropped substantially and continues to drop, not just Harry & Meghan's appeal, but the fact that these attention-seeking personalities can be found anywhere trying to hock some goods or services through their "super brand"... they joined that bandwagon way too late, imo. Maybe 15-20 years ago, they might've found a nice niche somewhere before the field became saturated with influencers...

Out of genuine interest Maru - how do you reconcile an apparent understanding that trickle-down concepts are a boatload of BS, with being an apparent Trump/Oligarchy supporter?

[arista]

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-fd28913a-612b-48ce-9b41-950a4fe0bb8d.jpeg

[Glenn.]

Looks nothing like it lmao

[Cherie]

Looks nothing like it lmao

Errr..I think you need to go to specsavers

[Glenn.]

Errr..I think you need to go to specsavers

So you think she copied the logo then Cherie?

[Cherie]

So you think she copied the logo then Cherie?

Hopefully not intentionally ..

[Glenn.]

Hopefully not intentionally ..

Unlikely.

Porreres is typical of the small towns on the Mallorcan plain - nothing much to see, but an easy-going atmosphere and a good place to while away a couple of hours.

The fact it’s made headline news is ridiculous

[Maru]

That sticker not being on right still bugs me from the OP.

Also RIP old brand name.

[Livia]

They're similar but different enough. The palm.trees are different, the Spanish birds look like some kind of swift while Megan's look like humming birds... I'm not a Megan fan but this is a bit daft.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Total rip off

embarrassing

:facepalm:

[thesheriff443]

They cant even come up with an original name and logo
Total misfits

[bots]

who actually cares? :laugh:

[Cherie]

who actually cares? :laugh:

The Mayor of Majorca...:laugh:

[thesheriff443]

who actually cares? :laugh:

The people who issue trade marks

[Glenn.]

It’s a non story to feed the haters. Seems to be working :joker:

[Cherie]

If Meghan was the Apprentice, Sugar would be asking what that branding has to do with Jam :laugh:

It's incredible with all that talent they should have at their disposal that that is the best they can come up with :think:

[Crimson Dynamo]

:shocked:

Meghan Markle "emotionally abusing" Prince Harry to the point he is breaking down in
tears in public

BXNpCHZMs7M

[rusticgal]

Poor Megs...she just can't seem to get there first can she :shrug:

[Glenn.]

If Meghan was the Apprentice, Sugar would be asking what that branding has to do with Jam :laugh:

It's incredible with all that talent they should have at their disposal that that is the best they can come up with :think:

Pretty sure she’s moved on from Jam.

arista bumped an old thread

[Crimson Dynamo]

Another brand disaster for Meghan Markle? Duchess's merchandise empire in
crisis as American Riviera Orchard is renamed days before her Netflix launch...
with a subtle dig at Royal family

Meghan Markle's rebranding of American Riviera Orchard was today called a 'total rush' using 'recycled' promos made a year ago.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/assets/uploads/updates/2024-08-08/l_1217842_041406_updates.jpg

One communications veteran said today: 'You wouldn’t catch Kim Kardashian
doing this', adding the 11th hour name change 'telegraphed inauthenticity'.

As Ever has been launched in a breathless selfie-style video and will sell jam

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14408617/Meghan-Markle-American-Riviera-Orchard-rebrand-disaster.html

[jet]

Meghan has had to give up the name American Riviera Orchard for her lifestyle show. Back in November, she filled in the forms with incorrect information and was given 3 months to fix it. Now she can’t use it at all due to trademark issues. She has announced the new name will be ‘as ever’ :umm2: but there is already an independent clothing business in NYC with that name and they are not happy at all so she may have another trademark problem.
Does she not do any research at all before jumping in head first? A simple google can reveal that another business has the name that you want. An astute businesswoman she is not.
What a mess.

[jet]

Another brand disaster for Meghan Markle? Duchess's merchandise empire in
crisis as American Riviera Orchard is renamed days before her Netflix launch...
with a subtle dig at Royal family

Meghan Markle's rebranding of American Riviera Orchard was today called a 'total rush' using 'recycled' promos made a year ago.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/assets/uploads/updates/2024-08-08/l_1217842_041406_updates.jpg

One communications veteran said today: 'You wouldn’t catch Kim Kardashian
doing this', adding the 11th hour name change 'telegraphed inauthenticity'.

As Ever has been launched in a breathless selfie-style video and will sell jam

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14408617/Meghan-Markle-American-Riviera-Orchard-rebrand-disaster.html

That video is so cringe. I'm not laughing, honestly I'm not. :hehe:

[arista]

Meg has stolen a Logo
she must do another one.
Not let this go on.................

https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-fd28913a-612b-48ce-9b41-950a4fe0bb8d.jpeg

[Crimson Dynamo]

she looks ill in that photo

[GoldHeart]

Pretty sure she’s moved on from Jam.

arista bumped an old thread

Now it's Billy Elish T - Shirts :hee:

[arista]

she looks ill in that photo



Yes
Under stress.

Stealing a Majorca Logo
design.

[Cherie]

Pretty sure she’s moved on from Jam.

arista bumped an old thread

No its still Jam, she has rebranded and is now adding cakes

[Gusto Brunt]

She sent me a pot of jam. It was rubbish. :p

[Cherie]

That video is so cringe. I'm not laughing, honestly I'm not. :hehe:

My toes have yet to unfurl....:laugh:

[rusticgal]

No its still Jam, she has rebranded and is now adding cakes



Not Jam cakes….:laugh:

[bots]

Megs muffin would be a much more successul brand

[arista]

Sky News Text:
[The Duchess of Sussex has been
accused of exploiting her children
as part of "her latest money-making venture".]


https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-6e6d6134-fa36-41fc-9d08-33a1cf6e1854.jpeg

[thesheriff443]

She used to roll out Harry to get noticed now he is as unpopular as she is it’s the kids turn
She is desperate

[Crimson Dynamo]

"tacky and desperate"

[Beso]

Just stick them on the front of the jam jars and be done with it fgs.

[bots]

it's a family business

[Crimson Dynamo]

Meghan's £712 'ethical' handbag being sold via new online shop is made by
Rwandan women being paid as little as 10P AN HOUR... while Duchess is tipped
to make millions from new venture


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/14/18/93152087-14192859-image-a-8_1734201881440.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/03/25/09/96539471-14533723-image-m-2_1742894875754.jpg



Meghan Markle, as a "female founder," is launching a new podcast called
"Confessions of a Female Founder" with Lemonada Media, featuring candid
conversations with other female entrepreneurs, and exploring her own
journey as an entrepreneur.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14533723/meghan-markle-ethical-handbag-online-shop-women-10p-hour.html

[Livia]

"Ethical" lol.....

[rusticgal]

On another note I really don't get these photo's of people who clearly want to protect their children's identities and think we are all interested in looking at the back of their heads...:shrug:

[Glenn.]

On another note I really don't get these photo's of people who clearly want to protect their children's identities and think we are all interested in looking at the back of their heads...:shrug:

One of the reasons she began to be so hated was because she refused to show you all her new born baby.

[jet]

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

[Crimson Dynamo]

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.
She is and it's no surprise. She has used her father and sister in a similar way

Chilling

[rusticgal]

Nothing more left in the pot….its time to opt for the ‘private life’ they both desperately craved.

[Glenn.]

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

No one is entitled to see their children.

[Redway]

It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid) and heard more about them in the last few weeks than we did in 3 years.

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Meghan Markle Posts a Stunning New Photo of Archie and Lilibet in Her Garden

[Crimson Dynamo]

Oops

[rusticgal]

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.


No one said they didn’t…

[Redway]

No one said they didn’t…

“It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid)”

[Glenn.]

No one said they didn’t…

And the thread when Archie was born was dripping with anger and entitlement.

[Cherie]

And the thread when Archie was born was dripping with anger and entitlement.

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

[jet]

They’re children. They have a legal right to privacy.

Privacy for the kids until she is pushing an important money spinning venture, like the 2022 Netflix documentary. Out came little Archie, face and all.
Now that she is desperate for this latest venture to succeed, she has mentioned details about the kids at least a dozen times in the last few weeks. She’s just a struggling working Mom, don’t you know.

[Crimson Dynamo]

what on earth:shocked:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm20rrJWsAADhAY?format=jpg&name=small

[Mystic Mock]

what on earth:shocked:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gm20rrJWsAADhAY?format=jpg&name=small

What's wrong?

[Glenn.]

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.

[rusticgal]

“It's roll out the kids time. She’s using them, which has long been predicted, to promote her last ditch attempt at success. We’ve seen (well, not their faces, God forbid)”


Whats that got to do with your comment though...about rights to privacy. No one has said they dont have rights to privacy :shrug:

[rusticgal]

are you really trying to kick start an argument about a 5 year old thread....


Its exactly what he is doing. :sleep:

[Glenn.]

Whats that got to do with your comment though...about rights to privacy. No one has said they dont have rights to privacy :shrug:

Because of what jet said….

God forbid we see their faces.

No one has any entitlement to the children’s faces.

[rusticgal]

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.


It was about breaking with tradition...get your facts right.

[Glenn.]

Its exactly what he is doing. :sleep:

No babe I was stating fact. People were outraged, angry and entitled when Meghan had Archie. Seems pretty appropriate to bring up now her kids are the topic of conversation.



As you ignored the response and instead choose to try and come for me.

Very on topic to be discussing the vile entitlement of that baby that day was sickening. A sign of the unhinged behaviour that has snowballed.

[Glenn.]

It was about breaking with tradition...get your facts right.

It’s the same thing. It’s the parents decision to show their baby to the world. And you guys hated that they didn’t and excused your unhinged entitlement as “she’s breaking tradition”

It’s weird as ****

[rusticgal]

Because of what jet said….

God forbid we see their faces.

No one has any entitlement to the children’s faces.


It was clearly said in jest...and you have both turned it into something else...but if its the best you can do then carry on....anyway who is interested in seeing the back of people in a photograph....:laugh:

[Glenn.]

The “it was a joke” line

Debate over I think :joker:

[Livia]

No one wants to see the kids. No one wants to see even the back of their heads. No one wants to see anyone posting any kind of picture of their kids in order to sell some jam.

[Crimson Dynamo]

OR £700 African slave labour handbags

[jet]

No one wants to see the kids. No one wants to see even the back of their heads. No one wants to see anyone posting any kind of picture of their kids in order to sell some jam.

Exactly. I have never shown any interest in seeing their kids - who has? The whole point is Meghan’s hypocrisy when it comes to their privacy.

[Beso]

The “it was a joke” line

Debate over I think :joker:

She was debating with the troll, until you butted in..its not your decision to decide when they stop debating.

[Glenn.]

She was debating with the troll, until you butted in..its not your decision to decide when they stop debating.

Who yanked your chain?

[Livia]

Who yanked your chain?

Who yanked yours? You are so badly triggered when someone mentions Megan...

[Glenn.]

Here comes the pack. Bore off

[Beso]

Here comes the pack. Bore off

You want everyone discussing the topic to go away...

What if we say no?


Watch a gonna do then, big boy.

[Glenn.]

You want everyone discussing the topic to go away...

What if we say no?


Watch a gonna do then, big boy.

You’re not discussing the topic

[Livia]

Here comes the pack. Bore off

Ironic you use the term 'bore'. Are you going for the post record in this thread too?

[Livia]

You’re not discussing the topic

We're following your lead, perhaps.

[Glenn.]

Ironic you use the term 'bore'. Are you going for the post record in this thread too?

We're following your lead, perhaps.

Two posts to me in a matter of seconds? You having a slow day sweetheart?