Possessing photos of Muslim women without hijab should be made a criminal offence

[Crimson Dynamo]

Say Labour

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/03/04/20/95837961-0-image-a-1_1741120313722.jpg

The Commons' women and equalities committee said pictures of a Muslim
woman without her headscarf – taken without her consent – should be
considered 'non-consensual intimate images'.

Such photographs should be treated the same as child sex abuse images,
possession of which can carry long prison sentences, the MPs said.

It comes after a planned definition of "Islamophobia" being championed by
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was slammed for risking 'a blasphemy
law by the back door'.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/03/04/20/95837959-14461483-image-m-13_1741120608036.jpg
The committee's Labour chairman Sarah Owen said: 'Non-consensual
intimate image abuse is a deeply personal crime which can have life-
changing and life-threatening consequences'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14461483/Possessing-photos-Muslim-woman-without-hijab-criminal-offence-MPs-say.html

[Oliver_W]

No if the Photos are for the Police
then get that Religous Head gear off for that
then shove it back on


That is Common Sense
or it is hiding their full face.

Hijab doesn't hide the face.

[Beso]

:crazy:

[Beso]

Probably be a hate crime to insult a robot by 2030

[arista]

Hijab doesn't hide the face.


I corrected my text.

[bots]

taking a photo of anyone without consent isn't very cool, but how would you know it was a muslim woman that usually wore a hijab if she wasn't wearing one :laugh:

Love to see them try and prove wrong doing in court

[Crimson Dynamo]

taking a photo of anyone without consent isn't very cool, but how would you know it was a muslim woman that usually wore a hijab if she wasn't wearing one :laugh:

Love to see them try and prove wrong doing in court

There is no expectation of privacy when out in public and your pictures are captured all the time by CCTV and dashcam

[bots]

there is taking an indistinct photo in a crowd, and there is making someone the star of the phot. They are not the same thing, but i do agree, in the uk, there is no expectation of privacy in public, hence why we had harry in a nazi uniform etc :laugh:

[Crimson Dynamo]

Labour - covering muslim women from head to toe in public. Segregating Muslim women in public

https://i.pinimg.com/564x/77/11/c7/7711c7a8749bd065736d815636fbdc0e.jpg


Labour - Taking a picture of a Muslim women without being covered from head to toe

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZgV3ubT_JaW2ExDY8dhfF44ryeTs2_ PK4og&s

[bots]

the other thing is, who in labour actually knows what a woman is :laugh:

[Livia]

There is no expectation of privacy when out in public and your pictures are captured all the time by CCTV and dashcam

Yes. We are one of the most recorded people on the world. One nation, under surveillance. But hey, special treatment for Muslims.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Yes. We are one of the most recorded people on the world. One nation, under surveillance. But hey, special treatment for Muslims.

Yesterday:

Keir Starmer at the Ramadan Iftar event inside the British Parliament:

“I know this has been a very difficult time for Muslims in the UK with the pain of
the conflict in Gaza and the suffering of the Palestinians.”

[Livia]

Yesterday:

Keir Starmer at the Ramadan Iftar event inside the British Parliament:

“I know this has been a very difficult time for Muslims in the UK with the pain of
the conflict in Gaza and the suffering of the Palestinians.”

Poor, poor Muslims again.

[Ray.]

Probably be a hate crime to insult a robot by 2030

Only if that robot is praying towards Mecca at the time. :smug: