View Full Version : Paedophiles and Rapists could face Chemical Castration
arista
22-05-2025, 03:39 AM
BBC News Text :
["Paedos to be castrated" blasts the Sun
as it reports that Justice Secretary
Shabana Mahmood is looking into
making the chemical castration of paedophiles
and rapists mandatory.]
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-6d966bf1-6c03-4f31-b394-76b7558ed4e3.jpegi
Jessica.
22-05-2025, 06:23 AM
GOOD
Mystic Mock
22-05-2025, 06:31 AM
I'm up for it.
Crimson Dynamo
22-05-2025, 07:31 AM
I'm up for it.
Its just for paedos Mock, its not a national roll-out
Its just for paedos Mock, its not a national roll-out
[emoji3]
BBC News Text :
["Paedos to be castrated" blasts the Sun
as it reports that Justice Secretary
Shabana Mahmood is looking into
making the chemical castration of paedophiles
and rapists mandatory.]
https://liveblog.digitalimages.sky/lc-images-sky/lcimg-6d966bf1-6c03-4f31-b394-76b7558ed4e3.jpegi
As long has they get injected by a medical practitioner and not left to self medicate…
Kate!
22-05-2025, 07:50 AM
Its just for paedos Mock, its not a national roll-out
:joker:
Livia
22-05-2025, 09:19 AM
Pakistani paedos in grooming gangs didn't even face appropriate jail terms for their crimes. I'll wait and see if this ever happens.
Parmy
22-05-2025, 10:15 AM
Its just for paedos Mock, its not a national roll-out
:joker::joker:
:clap1:
Vicky.
22-05-2025, 10:46 AM
Great news
i can see this generating decades of appeals, meanwhile the convicted will remain free to offend again
Sky News reports that sex offenders and paedos will POSSIBLY be OFFERED the option of chemical castration ..
So it’s basically a no story
Sky News reports that sex offenders and paedos will POSSIBLY be OFFERED the option of chemical castration ..
So it’s basically a no story
…it’s not a non story…(…as if Arista would give a non story…:laugh:…)…
The government is to rollout a chemical castration pilot for sex offenders in 20 prisons, the justice secretary has confirmed.
An independent sentencing review recommended a series of reforms to tackle the issue of overcrowding in prisons in England and Wales, including early release, which are being considered by Shabana Mahmood.
The review, led by former Conservative justice secretary David Gauke, suggests mitigating the danger of reoffending for sex offenders released early with drugs that “suppress libido” or reduce “sexual thoughts”.
Following the recommendations, Mahmood has now told the Commons that a rollout of chemical castration will go ahead – and it may potentially become mandatory.
She said: “The review has recommended we continue a pilot of so-called medication to manage problematic sexual arousal.
“I will go further with a national rollout, beginning in two regions covering 20 prisons. And I am exploring whether mandating the approach is possible.
“Of course, it is vital that this approach is taken alongside psychological interventions that target other causes of offending, like asserting power and control.”
What does the report say?
Asked about chemically castrating sex offenders, Gauke told Sky News on Thursday that it is “not appropriate for every sexual offender”, adding that evidence has to be “built up” about its effectiveness.
He added: “I’m not going to claim it’s the answer for everything. This is about reducing the risk of reoffending in future.
…full article, it’s very high profile mainstream news story atm…
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/chemical-castration-sex-offenders-sentencing-review-prisoners-064135830.html
…it’s not a non story…(…as if Arista would give a non story…:laugh:…)…
The government is to rollout a chemical castration pilot for sex offenders in 20 prisons, the justice secretary has confirmed.
An independent sentencing review recommended a series of reforms to tackle the issue of overcrowding in prisons in England and Wales, including early release, which are being considered by Shabana Mahmood.
The review, led by former Conservative justice secretary David Gauke, suggests mitigating the danger of reoffending for sex offenders released early with drugs that “suppress libido” or reduce “sexual thoughts”.
Following the recommendations, Mahmood has now told the Commons that a rollout of chemical castration will go ahead – and it may potentially become mandatory.
She said: “The review has recommended we continue a pilot of so-called medication to manage problematic sexual arousal.
“I will go further with a national rollout, beginning in two regions covering 20 prisons. And I am exploring whether mandating the approach is possible.
“Of course, it is vital that this approach is taken alongside psychological interventions that target other causes of offending, like asserting power and control.”
What does the report say?
Asked about chemically castrating sex offenders, Gauke told Sky News on Thursday that it is “not appropriate for every sexual offender”, adding that evidence has to be “built up” about its effectiveness.
He added: “I’m not going to claim it’s the answer for everything. This is about reducing the risk of reoffending in future.
…full article, it’s very high profile mainstream news story atm…
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/chemical-castration-sex-offenders-sentencing-review-prisoners-064135830.html
Sky News clearly said the option of chemical castration MAY be offered though about 20 minutes ago
They are displaying the pros and cons
Parmy
22-05-2025, 01:11 PM
I'm assuming the victims have been ignored in all of this..as usual.
I'm sure this will work just as well as releasing the mentally ill dysfunctional individual back into the population and expecting them to be timely on medication to steer away from trouble. How one does a study on that is interesting as well as who is going to self-report an illegal sex offense? And how do they know the medication was delivered on time and properly without impacting the quality on the study (incarcerated setting where medication is mandated would mean they're heavily supervised, etc). Sadly, all these supposed easy "just take a pill", etc fixes to society's ills need a lot of verification before we should ever trust them, much less implement them on a wide scale.
The Slim Reaper
22-05-2025, 03:37 PM
Whenever we give permission for the state to commit violence against any of us - however much you might think they deserve it, the state is one step closer to committing violence against all of us.
Folks are complaining about white moms being locked up for saying burn them in hotels, and that all came about because of the clampdown on BLM with the anti-protest bill, that most of the folks opposed to an incarcerated racist mom, clapped like seals for.
The state should not be in the business of violence against citizens, however heinous their crimes.
Crimson Dynamo
22-05-2025, 04:05 PM
Labour really are panicking
tomorrow it will be Starmer to bring back hanging
Next week B & B's must include signage to say "No Blacks or Irish"
:skull:
The Slim Reaper
22-05-2025, 04:59 PM
Prince Andrew reading this story
https://media2.giphy.com/avatars/Prevuenz/2QNC8VXHDdaG.gif
Labour really are panicking
tomorrow it will be Starmer to bring back hanging
Next week B & B's must include signage to say "No Blacks or Irish"
:skull:
Hanging weirdos and paedos and murderers
Yes please
Liam-
22-05-2025, 06:27 PM
Not a fan of state enforced medical procedures as punishment, no matter who it’s being performed on
chemical castration wont stop someone abducting, torturing and murdering children
Parmy
22-05-2025, 08:06 PM
chemical castration wont stop someone abducting, torturing and murdering children
It may even encourage some mental cases.
Cherie
22-05-2025, 09:03 PM
Its just for paedos Mock, its not a national roll-out
:joker:
Mystic Mock
23-05-2025, 01:09 AM
Its just for paedos Mock, its not a national roll-out
:joker:
Considering how many Paedos seem to be out there, it might need to be a national roll-out.:laugh:
Mystic Mock
23-05-2025, 01:16 AM
Prince Andrew reading this story
https://media2.giphy.com/avatars/Prevuenz/2QNC8VXHDdaG.gif
He said that it's "no sweat."
Mystic Mock
23-05-2025, 01:18 AM
Whenever we give permission for the state to commit violence against any of us - however much you might think they deserve it, the state is one step closer to committing violence against all of us.
Folks are complaining about white moms being locked up for saying burn them in hotels, and that all came about because of the clampdown on BLM with the anti-protest bill, that most of the folks opposed to an incarcerated racist mom, clapped like seals for.
The state should not be in the business of violence against citizens, however heinous their crimes.
I can see your point on that tbh.
I really wouldn't put it past the UK either.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.