View Full Version : Who thinks the twins should be considered as one!
Wildcat!
19-07-2007, 10:18 PM
We all know that they have an unfair advantage by being twins and never involved in anything of substance. Does anyone agree that it would be fair, if they were given one vote, while nominating, and that when the housemate nominate, they should also vote for twins as one vote. Because until thats done, nobody will ever nominate them(and I am not saying they should be nominated, thats up to the housemates). Anyways I just dont think you can vote for sam, and not vote for amanda, and I am sure no one will ever nominate both of them. Any thoughts?:conf::conf:
Billy
19-07-2007, 10:19 PM
not really, there totally different ie, you can have a conversation with Sam
Conzors
19-07-2007, 10:19 PM
Not Me..
Theyre their individual person
LovelyL
19-07-2007, 10:20 PM
No they are totally different people and the housemates see that now
ChelseaFan
19-07-2007, 10:21 PM
Wouldn't be fair, I think it;s good as it is, they don't vote for the same people anyway.
spitfire
19-07-2007, 10:22 PM
Yes i agree nowsthebturn.They are both diffrent,i prefer sam but they do have an unfair advantage,as they have had since day 1.
imagination
19-07-2007, 10:41 PM
the most unfair thing as far as I am concerned, is would you upset one of the twins if you were in the house? Unlikely, knowing that , it automatically gives you 3 votes for nominations. Including Chanelle's for sure.
CassetteFinger
19-07-2007, 10:44 PM
No keep it simple there two diggerent people they shouldent be taged as the twins :xyxwave:
spitfire
19-07-2007, 10:49 PM
Originally posted by imagination
the most unfair thing as far as I am concerned, is would you upset one of the twins if you were in the house? Unlikely, knowing that , it automatically gives you 3 votes for nominations. Including Chanelle's for sure. As Tracey will find out this week:wink:
The other advantage is they are guarunteed one person not to vote them.
Lindyhop
20-07-2007, 01:59 AM
Originally posted by nowsthebturn
I just dont think you can vote for sam, and not vote for amanda, and I am sure no one will ever nominate both of them. Any thoughts?:conf::conf:
I see what your saying, but its not because they are twins that no-one will nominate them... if they were really annoying or argumentative, I'm sure they would both be nominated. its just coz they are so similar in their innocence and niceness that they arent nominated.
Lindyhop
20-07-2007, 02:01 AM
Originally posted by spitfire
The other advantage is they are guarunteed one person not to vote them.
It would have been really interesting to put twins who didnt get along into big brother! then they wouldnt have that guarantee... although i suppose they wouldnt have applied to be stuck together for so many weeks if they didnt get along.
CharlotteSometimes
20-07-2007, 02:02 AM
Originally posted by spitfire
The other advantage is they are guarunteed one person not to vote them.
The same is true of Piggy & Chanelle, or Liam & Brian, or Gerry & Carole, etc.
sarahtheangel
20-07-2007, 10:28 AM
twins are different people , may look the same but they are too differnt people . i have twins 1 boy 1 girl ,if they had both been the same sex i would have dressed them differntly to bring out there own person inside.
easypeasy
20-07-2007, 10:35 AM
who said they dont nominate the same people? thats untrue. carol and tracey every week.......
Its as unfair as having the goody family turning up in cbb, family sticks together. totally unfair on other hm's.
Wildcat!
20-07-2007, 11:29 AM
In BB France, they have triplets that are counted as one. They also get nominated as one, and get votes as one. They went up 4 eviction, all 3 and got sved. I just think it makes more sense
lily.
20-07-2007, 11:34 AM
Originally posted by imagination
the most unfair thing as far as I am concerned, is would you upset one of the twins if you were in the house? Unlikely, knowing that , it automatically gives you 3 votes for nominations. Including Chanelle's for sure.
But, you could say the same about Chanelle and Ziggy or anyone else who becomes part of a group or a couple.
I reckon the twins should be treated separately, as they are 2 different people.
I think if they are considered as a collective they have much better chances of winning. To the casual viewer , voting for 'Twins' is a tad easier than choosing between 2 people they dont no the difference between.
:)tom:)
20-07-2007, 12:41 PM
no
OPL73
20-07-2007, 01:07 PM
Frankly I couldn't give a rats @rse. Every single one of the housemates is starting to bore me.
lovelyg
20-07-2007, 01:12 PM
Totally agree, they both the same, boring, dull with nothing to say- get 'em both out x
spitfire
20-07-2007, 10:25 PM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Originally posted by spitfire
The other advantage is they are guarunteed one person not to vote them.
The same is true of Piggy & Chanelle, or Liam & Brian, or Gerry & Carole, etc. But the twins had that guarruntee before they even entered the house.The others had to make their friendships.
Foebane100
20-07-2007, 10:28 PM
since they have treated them as two that is the way it has to stay.
It wouldn't be fair to treat them as one and have them with four nominations they could use between them.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.