PDA

View Full Version : Lord Levy in the Clear


rex3
20-07-2007, 12:30 PM
Lord Levy zionist-jew got away with paying tony blair for favours.

HOW COULD HE HAVE GOT AWAY WITH IT? he got caught and now hes in the clear?????

*democracy for civilians is a technique to hide what goes on every where else.

Sunny_01
20-07-2007, 12:33 PM
Who knows Rex, I htink that whenever politicians are involved they tend to get away with their corrupt behaviour which seems so unfair as we you can be sure would have faced the full wrath of the law.

rex3
20-07-2007, 04:26 PM
Originally posted by Sunny_01
Who knows Rex, I htink that whenever politicians are involved they tend to get away with their corrupt behaviour which seems so unfair as we you can be sure would have faced the full wrath of the law.

yeah but this shouldn't be the case of "oh its the weasely politicians again", i mean does any body know what favours they could have been.

for example:

Lord Levy was Blairs man for the Middle east, Levy is a zionist-Jew, could he have paid Tony Blair party to go to war with Iraq to stop Saddam from Waging war against the zionist regime of Israel.

James
20-07-2007, 04:42 PM
The fact that he is Jewish is not relevant to the Cash-for-honours affair.

rex3
20-07-2007, 05:20 PM
Originally posted by James
The fact that he is Jewish is not relevant to the Cash-for-honours affair.

zionist-jew is considered as one word, i did not say Jewish

James
20-07-2007, 05:24 PM
Still not relevant to the Cash-for-honours business.

rex3
20-07-2007, 06:14 PM
Originally posted by James
Still not relevant to the Cash-for-honours business.

*huff* he was Blairs envoy to the middle east and Israel is in the middle east.

There is a relevance that he is a Zionist (Pro-Israel) where biasm within Blairs policy towards the ME, would be caused becuase someone was paying him to be...............................................

maybe if i said blairs envoy was a Palestinian, then that wouldn't be so insensative.

Dan_
20-07-2007, 06:46 PM
Everyone involved in the Cash-for-honours scandal got away with it, no surprise there then.

spacebandit
22-07-2007, 12:05 AM
He got away with it because the political elite in this country closed ranks, and covered up the whole disgraceful and shameful mess.

Not because he was a jew or a zionist or anything else you want to call him, except "connected".

Corrupution in this country is endemic, we live in a country where it is a simple truth and a plain fact of life that some people are above the law and treat differently from Joe Public.


Originally posted by rex3
maybe if i said blairs envoy was a Palestinian, then that wouldn't be so insensative.

No, just equally as wrong as your reasoning why Levy got away with it

rex3
22-07-2007, 11:28 AM
why do you think he got away then?????????????

he was caught red handed?

Lauren
22-07-2007, 11:41 AM
Originally posted by rex3
why do you think he got away then?????????????

he was caught red handed?

He didn't get away with it persay, as we all know it happened. However, it was clearly a government cover-up to stop further investigations into more claims and presenting the government as the big mess it is.

spacebandit
23-07-2007, 12:29 AM
Originally posted by rex3
why do you think he got away then?????????????

he was caught red handed?

They were all caught red-handed and thats why he got away with it, not because he is jewish.

We have a ruling elite in this country who are above the law, there are intertwined links between our "rulers" and one or two media owners who essentially control this country's news and are able to manipulate the plebs [you, me and joe public].

There are a few bastions of a free press, but marginalised and scattered.

With all due respect this zionist conspiracy malarkey is just another form of control, to let people go off on wild tangets and then they can be easily made to look foolish.

The real power lies in a few families, their cronies and enforcers, and major corporations.

Fear is the key, keep the populace frightened, the boogey
man won't work, so we have things like the zionist conspiracy, "the war on terror", all replacing "reds under the beds". One way or another for the comtrol to work we have to be frightened

Am I saying a "zionist conspiracy" doesn't exist - no, I am saying the actual movement is tiny - but has been allowed to gain a massive, almost mythic status because of a series of false flag ops.

Black Ops and false flags are now endemic, creations of our "leaders" to frighten the population into meek subjugation, like a scolding parent "Only we can protect you"

We have a new McCarthyism, designed to instill fear in us.

That the only important factor is the money to be made, that the likes of you and I are expected to die for, and that they never ever get caught out.

those that speak out and look like they will be listened to, ALL go the same way. JFK, RFK, MLK, the list goes on.

Forget the zionist conspiracy, forget religion and look the major corporations and ties to our "leaders" for the real power brokers and criminals.

They and their sons don't fight in wars - they start them and they profit from them, and only in exceptional circumetances are any of them sacrificed on the alter of law, when they do something so breathtakingly crass - it can't be brushed away - and if its really really bad - well, people die everyday, and in circumstances such as those exceptional ones, usually just before they go to prison.

Dr43%er
23-07-2007, 10:46 AM
Keith Vaz has been getting away with it for years. Is he a Zionist Jew too?

rex3
23-07-2007, 04:50 PM
Originally posted by Dr43%er
Keith Vaz has been getting away with it for years. Is he a Zionist Jew too?

getting away with incouraging war? incouraging sales of weapons and guns in the ME?

Dr43%er
23-07-2007, 04:56 PM
So as long as it does not involve the middle east then they can get away with stuff and not be Zionist Jews?

rex3
23-07-2007, 09:01 PM
Originally posted by Dr43%er
So as long as it does not involve the middle east then they can get away with stuff and not be Zionist Jews?


WTF! for 1 minute stop thinking of the concept of BIASM, kieth vaz isnt involved in thousands DIEING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

spacebandit
24-07-2007, 01:12 AM
Originally posted by rex3
Originally posted by Dr43%er
So as long as it does not involve the middle east then they can get away with stuff and not be Zionist Jews?


WTF! for 1 minute stop thinking of the concept of BIASM, kieth vaz isnt involved in thousands DIEING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Neither is Levy - unless you are attempting to claim that ALL jews have blood on their hands

CharlotteSometimes
24-07-2007, 04:43 AM
Originally posted by spacebandit
They were all caught red-handed and thats why he got away with it, not because he is jewish.

We have a ruling elite in this country who are above the law, there are intertwined links between our "rulers" and one or two media owners who essentially control this country's news and are able to manipulate the plebs [you, me and joe public].

There are a few bastions of a free press, but marginalised and scattered.

With all due respect this zionist conspiracy malarkey is just another form of control, to let people go off on wild tangets and then they can be easily made to look foolish.

The real power lies in a few families, their cronies and enforcers, and major corporations.

Fear is the key, keep the populace frightened, the boogey
man won't work, so we have things like the zionist conspiracy, "the war on terror", all replacing "reds under the beds". One way or another for the comtrol to work we have to be frightened

Am I saying a "zionist conspiracy" doesn't exist - no, I am saying the actual movement is tiny - but has been allowed to gain a massive, almost mythic status because of a series of false flag ops.

Black Ops and false flags are now endemic, creations of our "leaders" to frighten the population into meek subjugation, like a scolding parent "Only we can protect you"

We have a new McCarthyism, designed to instill fear in us.

That the only important factor is the money to be made, that the likes of you and I are expected to die for, and that they never ever get caught out.

those that speak out and look like they will be listened to, ALL go the same way. JFK, RFK, MLK, the list goes on.

Forget the zionist conspiracy, forget religion and look the major corporations and ties to our "leaders" for the real power brokers and criminals.

They and their sons don't fight in wars - they start them and they profit from them, and only in exceptional circumetances are any of them sacrificed on the alter of law, when they do something so breathtakingly crass - it can't be brushed away - and if its really really bad - well, people die everyday, and in circumstances such as those exceptional ones, usually just before they go to prison.
LOL! Surely there must've been a synopsis of a Jeffrey Archer novel that's set in England you could've cut & pasted instead?

spacebandit
24-07-2007, 05:30 AM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
LOL! Surely there must've been a synopsis of a Jeffrey Archer novel that's set in England you could've cut & pasted instead?

LOL! Surely theres something original you could have cut and pasted instead ?

CharlotteSometimes
24-07-2007, 06:35 AM
You question originality when the majority of your own post ranges from 40+ to almost 60 years out of date? :joker:

spacebandit
24-07-2007, 09:27 AM
Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
You question originality when the majority of your own post ranges from 40+ to almost 60 years out of date? :joker:

Would you care to expand your reasoning, care to explain your comment, care to state your position - or should we just put it down to another ad hominem flame ?

CharlotteSometimes
24-07-2007, 09:46 AM
The 'reasoning' is blatantly obvious. The position is that the post in question is a mishmash of tired conspiracy theories and archaic US political issues, severely lacking direction. And in the context of this thread, completely irrelevant.

rex3
24-07-2007, 10:52 AM
DID I SAY ALL JEWS? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post edited - Please don't insult other users it is against the TiBB rules - Red

Dr43%er
24-07-2007, 10:55 AM
Do ALL ZIONIST Jews have blood on their hands?

spacebandit
24-07-2007, 11:26 AM
Originally posted by rex3
DID I SAY ALL JEWS? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post edited - Please don't insult other users it is against the TiBB rules - Red

is this anything like your claim that

Originally posted by rex3

the Majority of JEWS in this WORLD are now in ISRAEL!



Easily provable to be false, yet initially you based your zionist jew theory on that [false] claim, you quickly dropped it of course when the truth was pointed out to you.

So, are you now talking in the kind of absolutes you were when you made the claim of the majority of the the worlds jews living in Isreal as proof for your zionist theories, or will you again drop the subject when facts get in the way of your argument ?

James
24-07-2007, 11:38 AM
Why use the word 'jews' at all? If these topics continue to provoke insults they will be locked.

spacebandit
24-07-2007, 12:16 PM
the word "jews" is not seen in and of itself as an insult, although the word "jew" has been used as an insult - most notably in South Park, leading Jewish organisations are campaigning to get people to stop using it as an insult but they are not campaigning for the removal of the word "jew" from any vernacular.

The Anti-Defamation League, B'nai B'rith International , Hillel [an american based group for Jewish students at universites] and the American Jewish Congress, and in Britain The Board Of Deputies, the Community Security Trust and the Union Of Jewish Students all refer to those who practice Judaism in their literature as either "jews" or "jewish".

When using the words "jew" or "jews" in some posts I have made I am merely referencing the religious division of people who are jewish.

The word Isreali cannot be used as the majority of the worlds Jews are not actually in Isreal, it would be tantamount to labelling a moslem as a "Mecca".

I would be at a loss to find another term to use to describe those who practice Judaism, other than the two used within the faith itself, and provided of course it is not used in an insulting manner.