Who would have gone if you had decided?

[Mervi]

1. Elizabeth

Elizabeth was really boring. The only funny things connected with her don't do her good. When she impersonated the chickens, the others said: "Don't, they might think you're a cock!" When Brian danced with her, he said "Oh God I feel sick!" Her flirting with Stuart and Dean and her clothes made ME sick. Her "Exit"-outfit was good, though.

2. Amma

Amma was very boring, too. As Naz said, she was wrapped in the blanket CONSTANTLY! I hated her farting and burping.

3. Dean

Dean was always complaining about the lack of intelligence in the house. He was comical in Helen's 'Classy Cutz' -clothes and imitating Narinder (Nasty Boy).

4. Bubble

Bubble was always sleeping and whining at BB. His merit was playing pranks at Brian.

5. Josh

Boooring! Was reading books all the time, no nocturnal activities as promised. His nice body and Brian-imitation (Nasty Boy) kept him on my list this far.

6. Stuart

There was nothing good about Stuart but he could have stirred more trouble in the house. I hated his sit-ups and winking. "It is not your turn to speak." GAAH!

7. Penny

Penny was crazy, but it's good that she got out sooner, for her own sanity's sake. I loved it when she called Amma's brushing hair scraping a horse!

8. Brian

Brian was funny, naturally, romping Narinder ("You lying *****!"), dancing flamenco, putting edt in his pimple in front of the mirror/camera and playing the imaginary flute as a devil. He was mean to Helen and Paul, though.

9. Narinder

It would have been more interesting if Narinder had stayed longer. That's all I can say.

10. Paul

Words fail me. It annoyed me, though, that he was always fidgeting with his hair in front of the mirror.

11. Helen

Helen should've won!! But I didn't like her licking forks and plates and her insecurity. She's fabulous!!!

[WILDCHILD]

To be completely honest, I dont think I would have changed anything about Big Brother 2. I think it was fine the way it was.
All the housemates contributed to each part of the show, it wouldnt have been the same if one person wasnt there. Even Elizabeth and Amma, who I didnt particulary like made the show what it was. They made BB2 the most brilliant Big Brother series ever!!:colour::thumbs::colour:

[Romantic Old Bird]

I agree with just about everything you said mervi

At the time I was livid that Brian nominated Helen instead of Elizabeth. I was so sad when they were parted like that.

I also really wanted Helen to win.

Looking back now I am glad that it went as it did. If Paul and Helen had been in together any longer they wouldn't have managed to keep their hands off each other, would have been terribly embarassed and maybe they wouldn't have stayed together.

If Helen had won it also might have been more difficult for them.

As it is, they are together and happy. I wish we saw more of them, but I am glad that everything has gone so well for them

[Legally blonde]

I wouldn't have changed anything either, I think. There was only two people in the house I really disliked, Narinder and Penny (and Helen in the first week :blush:) and it would be quite nice to know what would've happened if the evictions would've gone differently. Maybe Sticks could tell us what happens in an alternative universe (or whatever it is)?

[kaphc]

I didn't dislike Narinder in the house, but I grew to dislike her more and more once she was out of the house!

I was glad that Penny left when she did as she seemed to fragile to cope with the intensity of the BB house and the nomination procedure.

[minni]

I wouldn´t have changed anything. The money belonged to Brian and Helen and Paul belonged to eachother. A perfect ending for me!!!! :bouncy:

[BusyBee]

I didnt dislike anyone particularly whilst they were in the house, although Narinder did really get on my nerves when she came out and became such a fame seeker.

I agree with ROB, at the time I hated the fact that Brian nominated Helen rather than Elizabeth. But thinking about it, if H and P had stayed in that last week, it would have been very awkward. I think their feelings were such that they wouldnt have been able to go into that hut alone without the chance that things would go further than they both wanted to happen in the houe. It also gave them a break from each other to see how they really felt.

Paul for instance I think missed Helen a lot more than he was expecting and that week made him realise that his feelings were real. Helen spent the week analysing how she felt. They wouldnt have been able to do that if they had both been left in.

I'm glad Helen didnt win, I think there were enough pressures put on them as it was and that would have been multiplied by loads if she had won. I think they may have been pulled apart however much they wanted to be together.

Anyway it all worked out for the best didnt it. and I am sure P and H wouldnt change a thing.

[Legally blonde]

I think Brian's reasons for not nominating Elizabeth were understandable. And besides he was genuinly upset when it was announced that Helen was up for eviction. He was so sweet, Brian. He deserved to win.