Log in

View Full Version : Is this years BB the MOST unfair?


GlitterEyes
31-08-2007, 04:08 PM
Now it is near the end, do you think this year it has been the most unfair in the aspects of the twins. They had an advantage from day 1 going in together, aswell as someone who would never ever vote the other out. It has certainly helped them along the way without a doubt. The HM have been fine with this throughout yet I would of thought that they would of thought it was unfair and talked about it at some point. Now the twins are as one Hm they have an even bigger advantage at winning.

Big brother is a game and a competition, how can any other housemate compete against two people?

JeanP!
31-08-2007, 04:09 PM
Nominating them
:conf2::conf2:

It was very easy, now is very late :thumbs2:

Arneldo
31-08-2007, 04:13 PM
It is completely unfair.

Sam & Amanda are nice girls but they have totally unfair advantage over the rest of the house. From day 1 they had somewhere who they could rely on and knew they would never nominate and knew they would never nominate them. They formed separate fan bases and then BB did its worst move ever and asked them did they want to become one. It was a blatant fix and it was unfair on the rest of the housemates. It was two against one and it ruined the game. Amanda & Sam had to separate big fan bases, while Brian & Liam had bigger fan bases. But when BB out Sam & Amanda two big fan bases together they handed them the prize.

bananarama
31-08-2007, 04:14 PM
Yeah. They were seperate for a long time. It's up to other housemates to realise the competition and nominate accordingly. If they do not then they have only them selves to blame ......Even when they became as one. If the others wanted a chance to win they should have nominated them at every oportunity.

After all they have all clocked on to the fact that the twins would be popular. They did nothing in the way of nominations to try and get them out.......

Mike
31-08-2007, 04:16 PM
It's been a complete joke. All the time they were counted as seperate housemates it was fine because it meant that all had an equal chance of winning but then the minute they became one housemate that was it, all their fans joined together meaning the other favourites i.e Brian & Liam couldn't get near them simply because their fanbases' were never going to be as big as two put together. No doubt the 'twins to win' people will disagree on this though.

Captain.Remy
31-08-2007, 04:26 PM
BB7 was the most unfair ! BB8 rocks !

JeanP!
31-08-2007, 04:26 PM
^Agree

CassetteFinger
31-08-2007, 04:27 PM
Samanda to win.

Arneldo
31-08-2007, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by sunshine30
BB7 was the most unfair ! BB8 rocks !

How?

Bells
31-08-2007, 04:37 PM
I am a big fan of the twins – that however is because I like their personalities, think they’re kind and fun-loving, so I generally think they’re pleasant housemates. At the same time though, I would be lying if I said the entire concept of having these two this year was fair.

At the beginning when they first entered, I remember plenty of people wondering what I was wondering – whether these two would count as one housemate or not. I definitely think that if this were to be the case, it should have been decided early on and made completely clear – then we wouldn’t have had the constant confusion and some of the audience thinking BB is biased (can’t say I fully blame them).

I feel Brian especially, being a strong contender, has been put at a disadvantage because of the unexpected twist... as well as the other housemates.

Flavaflav
31-08-2007, 05:26 PM
thats Big Brother For You

Barbie
31-08-2007, 05:28 PM
i can see how the twins having each other was an advantage but the housmates knew what they had to do but didnt want to nominate them and for me its oh well TWINS 2 WIN! call- 09011 21 22 24

bananarama
31-08-2007, 05:37 PM
Putting someone like Pete in was unfair. Someone like Nadia was unfair. (The nevelty vote counts)

It would be even more unfair if a fake like Brian got past the winning line....