Chanelle In Nuts Pics

[andybigbro]

http://img6.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/a/0/6/2/a062c987b3e10d95f39e8936a82cf8e6f55c588e.jpg (http://img6.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=a062c987b3e10d95f39e8936a82cf8e6f55 c588e) http://img6.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/c/b/1/e/cb1e4edba1758a85c2d646a69029016f60762ce1.jpg (http://img6.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=cb1e4edba1758a85c2d646a69029016f607 62ce1) http://img5.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/3/7/8/8/37887cbdacc3bc1770637e88a3d76c1ce58a8515.jpg (http://img5.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=37887cbdacc3bc1770637e88a3d76c1ce58 a8515) http://img3.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/2/4/c/9/24c9b64f9bcc3be4b25488501267e0034c550d46.jpg (http://img3.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=24c9b64f9bcc3be4b25488501267e0034c5 50d46) http://img3.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/0/f/a/b/0fab62a1f27baab435d88b302315292cff715152.jpg (http://img3.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=0fab62a1f27baab435d88b302315292cff7 15152)
http://img6.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/a/d/a/0/ada0277da04cf71f1fc70f4ad43616746f7d8a08.jpg (http://img6.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=ada0277da04cf71f1fc70f4ad43616746f7 d8a08) http://img3.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/f/1/1/8/f118160fd1867f65e2272189ece3cc08f5cb6fa8.jpg (http://img3.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=f118160fd1867f65e2272189ece3cc08f5c b6fa8) http://img6.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/6/a/1/b/6a1ba4727b3f190b8f6122598b61e26640c6fe7f.jpg (http://img6.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=6a1ba4727b3f190b8f6122598b61e26640c 6fe7f) http://img5.shareavenue.com/thumbnails/e/4/b/b/e4bb3c56bdbdb9196e5d88de6878bd52a7cc60f5.jpg (http://img5.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=e4bb3c56bdbdb9196e5d88de6878bd52a7c c60f5)

[SairBabi92]

:rolleyes: This completley puts me off the HMs when they do this!

[bananarama]

Originally posted by SairBabi92
:rolleyes: This completley puts me off the HMs when they do this!


Why!!! Once in a life time to set themselves up financially. They are just pin up photoes. Nothing really bad........What's the problem! :puzzled:

[Jackie]

I think the pictures are classy why shouldnt she do this she has a lovely figure.

[Sarah.]

What's exactly classy about being in Nuts?

[Jackie]

Chanelle was on page 3 in the sun whats the difference between nuts and the sun?

[Wasted]

Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by SairBabi92
:rolleyes: This completley puts me off the HMs when they do this!


Why!!! Once in a life time to set themselves up financially. They are just pin up photoes. Nothing really bad........What's the problem! :puzzled:

The only real problem imo is that Chanelle slated a couple of the housemates for wearing revealing clothes in the house, not even nudity, just revealing clothes. And now she's posing for Nuts.

[bananarama]

Originally posted by mrs_rko
What's exactly classy about being in Nuts?

Nut's may not be regarded as a clasy magazine but some pictures within it could be described as staying on the side of acceptable taste to most. However such taste is dependant on each persons level of prudity....

[SairBabi92]

Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by SairBabi92
:rolleyes: This completley puts me off the HMs when they do this!


Why!!! Once in a life time to set themselves up financially. They are just pin up photoes. Nothing really bad........What's the problem! :puzzled:

Well it isn't very respectable! & I am allowed to express my opinion!

[CassetteFinger]

Woooo Chanelle .

[bananarama]

Originally posted by SairBabi92
Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by SairBabi92
:rolleyes: This completley puts me off the HMs when they do this!


Why!!! Once in a life time to set themselves up financially. They are just pin up photoes. Nothing really bad........What's the problem! :puzzled:

Well it isn't very respectable! & I am allowed to express my opinion!

Of course you are. But the statement "Not very respectable" sounds like it is meant to be a fact. When in fact it is only one persons point of view.

I beleive it is wrong to say someone is not respectable just because they do pin up pictures that are not even remotely lewd.

To assume someone is not respectable based on a few pictures is in my opinion wrong and probably just a sign of being prudish.......

[Retroman]

People have become more accepting of nudity due to constant exposure to it...
Just because you're used to something, and it becomes normality, doesn't necessarily make it acceptable or morally decent. It just means you're not shocked by it, hence you feel you don't have a problem with it.

We are afterall, witnessing the act of someone making a profit out of exposing their body. Which is cheap and requires no talent except having good gene's from your parents =] I don't believe things like that are right, when the majority of people have to work for their money [even many A- list celebrities such as actors etc.] Also, in my personal view, I would never date someone who is willing to expose themselves to the world in their underwear/topless with their legs wide open...
It simply doesn't represent someone who has values, or who is faithful etc.

On the other hand, this is her one opportunity to set herself up financially as previously mentioned and if she has a body that people will want to look at...she should take advantage of that for her own personal gain. There's no logical reason why not.

[bananarama]

Nudity be it something we are used to or not is in my opinion far removed from being immoral. Many people get their knickers in a twist over the human body when in fact nothing could be more natural.

Imorality to me is when sick patients at hospitals are refused life saving drugs because of a shortage of money. While at the other end of the spectrum we give criminals a virtual blank cheque book when it comes to looking after them for as long as needed.... Nudity is a triviality....Goodness knows why some are so much in fear of it.....

[Retroman]

It's not a fear...
It's the insight as to the mindframe of the person who is willing to do such things that can be the problem.

If nudity is so natural, if you honestly believe that, you'd be a naturist.
Which, might I add, are a group of people often judged for being "odd" by society.

If however, you cover yourself, there are reasons behind it.

Also, as I mentioned, it's not entirely about the lack of clothes, but poses such as legs being open that also have their implications.

When someone makes a job offer for a nude photoshoot, they do so because they know that they'll sell more copies and make more money due to the large amount of people who will get a direct thrill out of seeing her naked.
It's the equivalent of a picture based sexual act, exciting and pleasing people around the country for reasons that are entirely based on sexual desire/perversion.

Nudity is trivial compared to some matters, but as this is a topic based on naked pictures of Chanelle, there doesn't seem to be much chance to talk about anything else.

Lets look at Amy for example, who never turns down the chance to reveal her body...
And quite funnily enough, admitted that even after 30mins she's gagging for it and told people she wanted to ride Liam hard. Not to mention getting with Liam after one proper conversation.

All im saying is that people who expose themselves for personal gain, usually tend to be a certain kind of person [to some extent.]
And that kind of person, in my eyes, has a lack of morals.

[BBCH:fan]

omg!!!!! shes only do that to money!!!!!

[SairBabi92]

Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by SairBabi92
Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by SairBabi92
:rolleyes: This completley puts me off the HMs when they do this!


Why!!! Once in a life time to set themselves up financially. They are just pin up photoes. Nothing really bad........What's the problem! :puzzled:

Well it isn't very respectable! & I am allowed to express my opinion!

Of course you are. But the statement "Not very respectable" sounds like it is meant to be a fact. When in fact it is only one persons point of view.

I beleive it is wrong to say someone is not respectable just because they do pin up pictures that are not even remotely lewd.

To assume someone is not respectable based on a few pictures is in my opinion wrong and probably just a sign of being prudish.......

I never implied Chanelle wasn't respectable at all! What i meant was that the poses and the clothes or should i say lack of clothes wasn't very respectable! I am a huge Chanelle fan and at the end of the day it is up to her how she chooses to make herself appear to the public...I know i won't be the first and last person to say and think this!

[Fanboy_Luke]

Originally posted by bananarama
Of course you are. But the statement "Not very respectable" sounds like it is meant to be a fact. When in fact it is only one persons point of view.

I beleive it is wrong to say someone is not respectable just because they do pin up pictures that are not even remotely lewd.

To assume someone is not respectable based on a few pictures is in my opinion wrong and probably just a sign of being prudish.......

It's not so much the pictures but what Nuts and Zoo stand for in general. Makes Loaded and FHM look like Vogue. Nuts is grubby and tbh I don't think it's as offensive to women as it is to men. It's a magazine aimed at a stereotype. If a girl were to read it I wouldn't blame her for hating the male race.

Sorry Chan but the forth picture along is trashy as.

[bananarama]

Originally posted by Fanboy_Luke
Originally posted by bananarama
Of course you are. But the statement "Not very respectable" sounds like it is meant to be a fact. When in fact it is only one persons point of view.

I beleive it is wrong to say someone is not respectable just because they do pin up pictures that are not even remotely lewd.

To assume someone is not respectable based on a few pictures is in my opinion wrong and probably just a sign of being prudish.......

It's not so much the pictures but what Nuts and Zoo stand for in general. Makes Loaded and FHM look like Vogue. Nuts is grubby and tbh I don't think it's as offensive to women as it is to men. It's a magazine aimed at a stereotype. If a girl were to read it I wouldn't blame her for hating the male race.

Sorry Chan but the forth picture along is trashy as.


Just like I said the reactions to the mags mentioned is dependant on each persons level of prudity.. Nothing to do with morals. It's just the perception from each of us as to what is moral or not.....Anyone of us could be right. Anyone of us could be wrong. It's all in the mind.......Prudity like jelousy can be very negative and destructive....

[Fanboy_Luke]

As you can see from my reaction to the Vanessa Hudgens issue, I'm not prudish or anti-nudity. For me it's not about morality and the fact that she is getting paid for it is irrelevant. I just think that some of those pictures look cheap and the whole appearing in Nuts is not in her best interests, they're just bimbos to the people who buy the magazines. It's a shame because when you watch the What They Did Next show she clearly says "I'm not taking my top off" which makes me think she may have felt pressured into it by the photographer. I really hope I'm wrong.

[Chri$]

Yummy for my Tummy

[Kate..]

i dont know what i think
she has a nice figure but she's just begging for attention really... and the money lol
xxx wonder what ziggy thinks!:laugh3:

[Retroman]

Good point...
If Ziggy and Chanelle are together, I can easily picture them getting in petty arguments about it. They both seem jealous/paranoid of eachother.

[DOG]

deleted....

[Captain.Remy]

She's awful, I don't like her body, her attitude, there is something strange and weird about her.

[camman123]

i like sam and amanda and chanelle there are the best girl and i do like liam and ziggy and brian and i do like a lot of people but i hate charley why does people like charley