Matt
24-09-2007, 04:58 PM
Fix fiasco dogs The Apprentice
Fury erupted last night when it emerged that the final of the recent series of "TiBB Does The Apprentice" may have been fixed.
Viewers of the show were asked to text in to the show to vote for the candidate that they wanted to win, at a charge of £10 per text. The public vote was meant to account for 50% of the final vote, with the other 50% being made up by judge James's decision.
However, last night a mole from the production crew told us that, in a sensational twist, THE VIEWER VOTE COUNTED FOR NOTHING, with James's decision being the only deciding factor in the final, and that James had chosen his winner the night BEFORE viewers were asked to vote for their finalist.
Our mole told us: "The whole thing was corrupt from the beginning. Viewers votes counted for nothing on the final night: it was James's decision, made prior to the finale, which was the only decision that counted.
"It's a sad state of affairs when you have to fix voting."
The show's "winner", Matthew Scott, said this morning: "I am confident that the show was not fixed and that I was the true Apprentice."
The show's executive producer, Sam, was unavailable for comment last night.
The premium rate phone-line regulator ICSTIX has commissioned an investigation into the debacle. If found guilty, the producers could be fined up to £5billion pounds.
Recent allegations that some contestants were allowed to bypass the audition process are still being investigated.
Source: The Daily Fib
Original article (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=72704)
Incase you don't get it... it's a joke!
Fury erupted last night when it emerged that the final of the recent series of "TiBB Does The Apprentice" may have been fixed.
Viewers of the show were asked to text in to the show to vote for the candidate that they wanted to win, at a charge of £10 per text. The public vote was meant to account for 50% of the final vote, with the other 50% being made up by judge James's decision.
However, last night a mole from the production crew told us that, in a sensational twist, THE VIEWER VOTE COUNTED FOR NOTHING, with James's decision being the only deciding factor in the final, and that James had chosen his winner the night BEFORE viewers were asked to vote for their finalist.
Our mole told us: "The whole thing was corrupt from the beginning. Viewers votes counted for nothing on the final night: it was James's decision, made prior to the finale, which was the only decision that counted.
"It's a sad state of affairs when you have to fix voting."
The show's "winner", Matthew Scott, said this morning: "I am confident that the show was not fixed and that I was the true Apprentice."
The show's executive producer, Sam, was unavailable for comment last night.
The premium rate phone-line regulator ICSTIX has commissioned an investigation into the debacle. If found guilty, the producers could be fined up to £5billion pounds.
Recent allegations that some contestants were allowed to bypass the audition process are still being investigated.
Source: The Daily Fib
Original article (http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=72704)
Incase you don't get it... it's a joke!