Log in

View Full Version : i read...


madman411
04-07-2008, 05:49 AM
... somewhere that this year there were not going to be new housemates entering during the series. it isn't fair to the contestants that entered the house on day 1. new housemates aren't really that exciting and i've already lost interest now. i thought that keeping the same hm's was a good idea. i realize that they need to replace dennis, but 3 new housemates!?? this is gonna be another series that featured 20+ housemates. come on... ::thumbsdown::

AngRemembered
04-07-2008, 05:57 AM
I agree with you, it never seems right to put additions in except to replace an ejected HM.
I don't suppose it will ever change though, and therefore I just wished there was a cut off point say by week 5, after that the numbers remain with no more additions, including whether there is an ejection after the designated cut off point

Rory
04-07-2008, 06:08 AM
I agree.
Not only is it non-beneficial for us, but it's non-beneficial for the late arrivals. Nobody ever warms up to them even if they're a fun person. They just aren't given the chance since everyone already has their favorites. Jennie is one that comes to mind that could've made it farther if she had been put in at launch.

SexualHeroics
04-07-2008, 06:13 AM
Get loads in. 30+ over the series.

They'd have a ****ing cheek expecting me to watch the same 15 housemates all year.

AngRemembered
04-07-2008, 06:16 AM
15 in one year? .. So you must be happy with the fact that we have already seen 17 in just under a third of a 13 weeks series:whistle:

SexualHeroics
04-07-2008, 06:25 AM
13 months more like. I don't know what they're dragging they're feet for, we should have had at least 25 through the doors by now. It's not Countdown where some grimey old ******* stinks up the chair for half the year, I want it quick, snappy, I haven't got time for all this bullshit.

AngRemembered
04-07-2008, 09:08 AM
Originally posted by SexualHeroics
13 months more like. I don't know what they're dragging they're feet for, we should have had at least 25 through the doors by now. It's not Countdown where some grimey old ******* stinks up the chair for half the year, I want it quick, snappy, I haven't got time for all this bullshit.

How come your Karma is so high, do you trade it on e-bay :joker::blush2::whistle:

arista
04-07-2008, 09:13 AM
Originally posted by madman411
... somewhere that this year there were not going to be new housemates entering during the series. it isn't fair to the contestants that entered the house on day 1. new housemates aren't really that exciting and i've already lost interest now. i thought that keeping the same hm's was a good idea. i realize that they need to replace dennis, but 3 new housemates!?? this is going to be another series that featured 20+ housemates. come on... ::thumbsdown::



No it is Very Fair

since Kat is Weak
Bex is Crazy

Mario and Lisa are too safe.


It is the best idea to Funk it up in there

madman411
04-07-2008, 10:46 PM
i think a good twist would make the series better. putting new hm's in is an old over used idea that doesn't do it for me any more. i miss old big brother.

SexualHeroics
04-07-2008, 11:34 PM
Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by SexualHeroics
13 months more like. I don't know what they're dragging they're feet for, we should have had at least 25 through the doors by now. It's not Countdown where some grimey old ******* stinks up the chair for half the year, I want it quick, snappy, I haven't got time for all this bullshit.

How come your Karma is so high, do you trade it on e-bay :joker::blush2::whistle:
What you jealous for? You've got twice as much as me.