PDA

View Full Version : Should the new HM's get immunity from nominations?


Mike
04-07-2008, 11:44 PM
What do you think? give them immunity from nominations next week? or throw them straight in to nominate/be nominated?

JeanP!
04-07-2008, 11:45 PM
Of course!! they should be exempt from eviction this week

Killian
04-07-2008, 11:46 PM
Let them nominate and be nominated. I was dissapointed to see Stuart being immune from nomination. I think that they should be given time to grow, but I doubt they'll be nominated during their first week. Also, I'd like to see their perspective of the housemates despite only just meeting them.

Sam1994
04-07-2008, 11:47 PM
Stuart did, so I think the new people should too.

Marc
04-07-2008, 11:47 PM
I've heard they CAN be nominated and CAN nominate

dylissimo
04-07-2008, 11:49 PM
They should be exempt... they're just obvious targets and its not fair.

*mazedsalv**
04-07-2008, 11:50 PM
I think they should be immune. Everybody that comes into BB as a late Hm has always been immune, why change it?

stonedape
04-07-2008, 11:50 PM
If it's only one of them I don't mind no immunity, but more than one and you're just asking for an intruder to be in one week. They deserve a chance to be at least a fraction as well known as the rest of the HMs.

CassetteFinger
04-07-2008, 11:51 PM
Originally posted by Sam1994
Stuart did, so I think the new people should too.

KKBL
04-07-2008, 11:58 PM
Stuart was immune so they should to.

BigSister
04-07-2008, 11:58 PM
only this week like stuart was

Dan_
05-07-2008, 12:25 AM
I think they should be immune from being nominated but should have the chance to vote.It would be interesting to see what their first impressions of their fellow housemates.

serensilver
05-07-2008, 07:49 PM
stu was immune so they should be too really i think! :thumbs:

BigOz
05-07-2008, 07:56 PM
Why not make a twist where they are ONLY ones ABLE to nominate? Liek Susie did.

Red Moon
05-07-2008, 08:01 PM
Yes they should be immune from nomination and not nominate.

The original housemates hardly know them and they shouldn't be allowed to nominate because they don't know the existing housemates. It makes it fair and also gives us a chance to get to know the new housemates.

Bells
05-07-2008, 08:24 PM
Wasn't something mentioned about Stuart being exempt on the night he went in? Maybe the fact that nothing was said last night means there might be more to it. Or maybe I'm just speculating. :hugesmile: I just think that unless there's a twist involved, they should be treated the same as Stu was.

jean
07-07-2008, 01:50 AM
i wud luv it to be the new housemates that nominate that wud be intersting lol

Lauren
07-07-2008, 01:51 AM
Throw them in the deep end.

MarkWaldorf
07-07-2008, 01:54 AM
It would be entertaining, I guess.
But then on the other hand they are still adapting.

rayheartbliss
07-07-2008, 03:10 AM
yerh....they have to nominate basd on whats happened in the house...not there views outside..but obviusly they know a few things! so it will affect how they nominate!

Xander
07-07-2008, 05:48 AM
I think they should, its only fair seeing as Stewart got immunity from nominations and I would like to see the new housemates stay in for a bit longer to see them come out their shells.

CrossingGuard
07-07-2008, 08:01 AM
They should have immunity. Let them have a chance to experience the BB house for at least a week.