NEXT YEAR for homless people please

[deeran]

i think it will be immence if bb10 was for the homeless dont ask y i just think it be more interesting than fame hungry slags and that


also on a serius note if they get money they can get there own homes...if payed in cash...maybe not....but ye


WAT DO U THINK?

[BapStar]

awww thats nice :cheer:

[AngRemembered]

They say the crazy ideas are always best, and this is crazy enough to be considered brilliant:laugh:
It would really be fun to watch..

I would also like to see for once a change in the format, where we the public by voting who we wish to be nominated, so the HM's can vote to evict who they dont want.
That would spare all the nomination discussions for one year, they could say what they wanted then knowing its the public which gives them the choice.
Discussing who you dont like or potentially vote for, would be on thier own head as we'd punish them harder by putting them up.
Might make for a better show all round :laugh:

[bananarama]

Originally posted by Angiebabe
They say the crazy ideas are always best, and this is crazy enough to be considered brilliant:laugh:
It would really be fun to watch..

I would also like to see for once a change in the format, where we the public by voting who we wish to be nominated, so the HM's can vote to evict who they dont want.
That would spare all the nomination discussions for one year, they could say what they wanted then knowing its the public which gives them the choice.
Discussing who you dont like or potentially vote for, would be on thier own head as we'd punish them harder by putting them up.
Might make for a better show all round :laugh:

Not sure about a BB for the homeless. Depends on what you mean by homeless. Down and outs drug addicts etc......Can't see that drawing in the ratings....After all BB is not a charity.


However I quite like the sound of the alternative nominating.

[petitefleur]

I like this thread - good ideas! Any BB production spys out there, take heed. :colour:

(I wasn't to sure about the spelling of 'heed' but decided to go with it as I thought 'take head' might be misconstrued. :blush:)

[deeran]

Originally posted by bananarama
Originally posted by Angiebabe
They say the crazy ideas are always best, and this is crazy enough to be considered brilliant:laugh:
It would really be fun to watch..

I would also like to see for once a change in the format, where we the public by voting who we wish to be nominated, so the HM's can vote to evict who they dont want.
That would spare all the nomination discussions for one year, they could say what they wanted then knowing its the public which gives them the choice.
Discussing who you dont like or potentially vote for, would be on thier own head as we'd punish them harder by putting them up.
Might make for a better show all round :laugh:

Not sure about a BB for the homeless. Depends on what you mean by homeless. Down and outs drug addicts etc......Can't see that drawing in the ratings....After all BB is not a charity.


However I quite like the sound of the alternative nominating.

nooo no drug addicts and crimal people just people down on their luck but imagine the stories they would have to tell...id be fastinated

[AngRemembered]

Originally posted by bananarama
.


However I quite like the sound of the alternative nominating.

Yes, to be more specific, the vote would change from time to time so the HM's would be kept guessing as to how the public percieved them.

So week one we'd vote for our most popular and the least 2 or 3 would be up for the HM's to vote on one of them to evict.
It would save all this conspiracy to as to who dont like who in the house.

Then in week 2, a change now we vote for the least popular and the top 2 or 3 names go to the HM's to vote on who to evict.
They would never be aware of if they were the least popular or most disliked, a subtle difference which I think would keep them more paranoid of the publics view than what they get now.
But the main benefit would be to stop this stupid nominating talk which blights every series:rolleyes:

[deeran]

Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by bananarama
.


However I quite like the sound of the alternative nominating.

Yes, to be more specific, the vote would change from time to time so the HM's would be kept guessing as to how the public percieved them.

So week one we'd vote for our most popular and the least 2 or 3 would be up for the HM's to vote on one of them to evict.
It would save all this conspiracy to as to who dont like who in the house.

Then in week 2, a change now we vote for the least popular and the top 2 or 3 names go to the HM's to vote on who to evict.
They would never be aware of if they were the least popular or most disliked, a subtle difference which I think would keep them more paranoid of the publics view than what they get now.
But the main benefit would be to stop this stupid nominating talk which blights every series:rolleyes:

i dont understand the bit about voteing for our favs to be up cause no one would want to see their fav to go would they?

[KingRock]

Best topic on this forum for sure.

Imagine the incentive they would have to stay in, here they are with shelter, water, food but if they get evicted its back to the streets and soup kitchens.

They probably wouldn't care much about luxury budgets though since actually having food would be their luxury.

[AngRemembered]

Originally posted by deeran


i dont understand the bit about voteing for our favs to be up cause no one would want to see their fav to go would they?
No, in a public vote of your favourite HM, the bottom 2 would be given to the HM's, not the 2 most popular.

In the public vote of who's most disliked, those would be the top 2 to be sent to the HM's.

This subtle differece in the publics vote would keep the HM's guessing as to which vote we had taken, would they be the least popular, or the most disliked, there is a difference and that would be funny to see how they would react, and how they would vote when evicting the options we the public gave them.

[deeran]

Originally posted by KingRock
Best topic on this forum for sure.

Imagine the incentive they would have to stay in, here they are with shelter, water, food but if they get evicted its back to the streets and soup kitchens.

They probably wouldn't care much about luxury budgets though since actually having food would be their luxury.


thanks and exactly they would try their hardest the befriend people just to stay in

but wat i would hope is that if they got evicted that they would get mag deals and money to be able to get off the streets and try to rebuild their lives with a bit of a kick start

[deeran]

Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by deeran


i dont understand the bit about voteing for our favs to be up cause no one would want to see their fav to go would they?
No, in a public vote of your favourite HM, the bottom 2 would be given to the HM's, not the 2 most popular.

In the public vote of who's most disliked, those would be the top 2 to be sent to the HM's.

This subtle differece in the publics vote would keep the HM's guessing as to which vote we had taken, would they be the least popular, or the most disliked, there is a difference and that would be funny to see how they would react, and how they would vote when evicting the options we the public gave them.

lets hope bb find this idea cause that sounds AWESOME!!! :hugesmile:

[Nurse57]

I can see it now. They would have to do tasks for food, alcohol and drugs. All in the name of entertainment.

Oh hang on, it's been done.


http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=7vnrycOWL2Q&feature=related

[deeran]

Originally posted by Nurse57
I can see it now. They would have to do tasks for food, alcohol and drugs. All in the name of entertainment.

Oh hang on, it's been done.


http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=7vnrycOWL2Q&feature=related



:sad: not for drugs but forthe food budget and it will give them some were to stay

[Nurse57]

So you don't think it would be the slightest bit exploitative?

[deeran]

Originally posted by Nurse57
So you don't think it would be the slightest bit exploitative?

not if it is handled in the correct way after all the tasks that are done now are for a food budget


and think how great ful they would be

[Nurse57]

Yes, but the people in there now know they could walk out and know where their next meal is coming from. If you took the homeless this would not be the case. So you would be exploiting their desperation for your entertainment.

[dcp42]

Originally posted by deeran
i think it will be immence if bb10 was for the homeless dont ask y i just think it be more interesting than fame hungry slags and that


also on a serius note if they get money they can get there own homes...if payed in cash...maybe not....but ye

What a fantastic idea! :eureka:

[deeran]

Originally posted by Nurse57
Yes, but the people in there now know they could walk out and know where their next meal is coming from. If you took the homeless this would not be the case. So you would be exploiting their desperation for your entertainment.


but they will also know they will get some money from mag deals anyway cause it usualy always happens so they wont be as desperate

[kerri]

homeless people have got alot more about them than the hms in bb they wouldnt go near it for nothing and im talking from personal experience albiet ten years ago xx

[bananarama]

Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by bananarama
.


However I quite like the sound of the alternative nominating.

Yes, to be more specific, the vote would change from time to time so the HM's would be kept guessing as to how the public percieved them.

So week one we'd vote for our most popular and the least 2 or 3 would be up for the HM's to vote on one of them to evict.
It would save all this conspiracy to as to who dont like who in the house.

Then in week 2, a change now we vote for the least popular and the top 2 or 3 names go to the HM's to vote on who to evict.
They would never be aware of if they were the least popular or most disliked, a subtle difference which I think would keep them more paranoid of the publics view than what they get now.
But the main benefit would be to stop this stupid nominating talk which blights every series:rolleyes:


Sounds good to me.....Hope they are taking note.....

If they stay with the present system I would hope at least they have one strict punishment for talking about noms. That punishment should be an automatic ban on nominating on the relavent week. If they continue to break the rules they should then be deemed to have nominated themselves....

This years jail punishment is ridiculous. No deterent at all. They are still allowed to talk with there housemates in other words none ending visitors......What sort of jail term is that!!!! Do you think they should bring back hanging for BB crimes!!! Ok i will take off the ruthless hat now.....:bigsmile: