View Full Version : Who was more childish
Sticks
09-07-2004, 08:33 PM
The protest was because the housemates failed the task and would not get their shopping (aw didums). I would have thought the footage of the housemates developing a silent communication would have been sufficient material for the producers. Oh No
The producers did not seem to get what they thought they wanted, so during the silence protest, the BB producers seemed placed restrictions on the housemates, played the alarm noises (I wonder if they had any consideration for those who live locally - On BB3 there were noise complaints by local residents :nono:), would not acknowledge them in the diary room and set fire to a cowboy hat.
The protest was because the housemates failed the task and would not get their shopping (aw didums), which may seem a childish response, but was the response of the BB producers even more childish?
Sunny_01
09-07-2004, 08:35 PM
I think it was more childish of the BB producers to be honest. I mean come on setting a hat on fire thats where all the real siliness started wasnt it ( well excluding Ahmed jumping up and down on the model )
Red Moon
09-07-2004, 08:37 PM
Has to be the producers.... it has been that way for most of the series. I liked the idea of the HM's taking control for a change.
And here we might have the start of an idea for BB6 - "The Producers" - where former HM's become BB and producers get tio live in the Bedsit for 2 and a bit months.
RED
Oh please it has to be the housemates! What this years bunch have forgotten about is what previous years housemates had to put up with!The BB3 lot had a divide with less food and fags than this years lot will ever get!
this years lot have had 2 weeks away abroad, food each week so far and a graduation party for Shell and BB didn't have to tell Shell about her graduation! I'm going to, probably be, the only one to defend BB but what we have to remember is they have lost this one shopping budget Boo Hoo.
Sticks
09-07-2004, 08:48 PM
My concern is also for the local residents who get disturbed by the noises played by the producers. There were complaints during BB3 that the housemates were a noise nuisance. I would have thought that the alarm noises would constitute a noise nuisance as well.
Red Moon
09-07-2004, 08:51 PM
Interesting about the noise caused by the house.... that is something I never thought about. I guess I always thought it was out in the middle of an industrial estate somewhere.
RED
Sunny_01
09-07-2004, 08:51 PM
well I am glad that I dont live near to them :hugesmile:
golden~rose
09-07-2004, 09:25 PM
they both were, hms started it to be childish and then bb played along so they are both equally childish!!
rachb
09-07-2004, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by Amy
Oh please it has to be the housemates! What this years bunch have forgotten about is what previous years housemates had to put up with!The BB3 lot had a divide with less food and fags than this years lot will ever get!
this years lot have had 2 weeks away abroad, food each week so far and a graduation party for Shell and BB didn't have to tell Shell about her graduation! I'm going to, probably be, the only one to defend BB but what we have to remember is they have lost this one shopping budget Boo Hoo.
No you won't Amy :thumbs:
I think the housemates must have thought they had gone to a holiday resort not big brother afterall why bother having tasks if its not going to make a difference if you fail:rolleyes:
Every year I scream at the tv when they order loads of rubbish on the shopping list the first week instead of stocking up on food in case they fail the tasks:nono:
I think they have had it easy not evil.
As for burning the hat isn't Stuart supposed to be an 'educated' grown up!?!
My two year old would not cry over losing his favourite hat
:rolleyes:
anybody would think they were burning his house down:laugh::laugh:
BigSister
09-07-2004, 09:41 PM
Yeah i agree with Rach I mean this year is called Evil BB not an holiday camp but they shouldnt have set Stus hat on fire if they hadnt done that Michelle wouldnt have tried to set the camera on fire
rachb
09-07-2004, 09:47 PM
The thing is though it wasn't Stu's hat.All the housemates got fancy dress costumes but he was the only one that kept the hat for longer:thumbs:and the money that they spent on buying him a new one would have bought food for this week when there isn't going to be any:thumbs:bet they wished they'd eaten the daft thing now:laugh::laugh::laugh:
The silence didn't get them anywhere if they had wanted to cause problems they should have had a few of the housemates that like to take their clothes off sit with no clothes on then the e4 coverage would have been of the garden all day:laugh::laugh:
that would have caused bb more problems:laugh::laugh:
golden~rose
09-07-2004, 09:49 PM
i agree, they should have thought of a better plan. though the silent treatment may work for a while it obviously looked like it was going to blow and you cant keep silent for too long anyways.
Red Moon
09-07-2004, 10:54 PM
They did it on the wrong day..... the show was shown on eviction night.... do it the day before and then they would have had less to pick from in the nightly broadcast.
RED
She Devil
09-07-2004, 11:01 PM
Surely the HM knew there was a chance they may have to sacrifice their food budget at some stage, afterall, it has happened on previous BBs and they have all seen it happen then
shellspeare
09-07-2004, 11:07 PM
Originally posted by Sticks
My concern is also for the local residents! I would have thought that the alarm noises would constitute a noise nuisance as well.
hello there sticks
me too and its terrible for the veiwers also!
love the "cyber warrior btw" its great
::wavey:
shellspeare
09-07-2004, 11:09 PM
Originally posted by She Devil
Surely the HM knew there was a chance they may have to sacrifice their food budget at some stage, afterall, it has happened on previous BBs and they have all seen it happen then
yeah, but who likes watching deprived people? its not survivour, give them fags and booze, thats entertaining!
:dance:
She Devil
09-07-2004, 11:09 PM
true
Originally posted by Sticks
The protest was because the housemates failed the task and would not get their shopping (aw didums). I would have thought the footage of the housemates developing a silent communication would have been sufficient material for the producers. Oh No
The producers did not seem to get what they thought they wanted, so during the silence protest, the BB producers seemed placed restrictions on the housemates, played the alarm noises (I wonder if they had any consideration for those who live locally - On BB3 there were noise complaints by local residents :nono:), would not acknowledge them in the diary room and set fire to a cowboy hat.
The protest was because the housemates failed the task and would not get their shopping (aw didums), which may seem a childish response, but was the response of the BB producers even more childish?
is that sticks?
complaining again????
:laugh: only jokin
Originally posted by Sticks
My concern is also for the local residents who get disturbed by the noises played by the producers. There were complaints during BB3 that the housemates were a noise nuisance. I would have thought that the alarm noises would constitute a noise nuisance as well.
well im sure the residents will pull thier finger out and complain if theres a problem :spin2:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.