so would you prefere normal highlights and nominations?

[mozzymozmoz]

what would you have prefered.
And i almost feel sorry for you if you chose a normal show.

[Sam1994]

It was way better than a normal show.

[mozzymozmoz]

THANK YOU!

everybody is so ungratefull

[Willz]

Miles better than normal nominations. Don't get why everyones in uproar. It's only because it's Sara and Lisa though.

[mozzymozmoz]

I can understand them being upset with the choice of hm, but bb had no controll over it.


and the person who voted for a normal show, in the last week may i add, should stop watching the show, and pretending to like big brother

[Brekkie]

It was more predictable than a Zimbabwean election.

It was obvious that face to face nominations would mean Lisa and Sara face eviction - if they'd been regular noms I'm sure Darnell would have been up.

And it was obvious they would share.

[mozzymozmoz]

so you would want the same routine as all 10 other weeks?
and complain at the end of the series saying it wasnt exiting enough.
were you an only child?

[Brekkie]

Nope, I'm a loyal viewer of nine years who expects more than a blatant Goldenballs rip-off.


With nominations, yes in fact I would have prefer the same because it was getting to the stage where the clique of five, who have dominated the process this year, were beginning to turn on each other - and are far more likely to do that secretly than behind closed doors. The real issue though is with 7 in the final week the last round of nominations is too easy for all concerned.


I wouldn't have minded something different if it had been good and completely unpredictable. Tonight's show would have been better if there was a risk of eviction - say if one had taken, the other gets evicted. If they share, they stay. If they both take, they both get evicted.


With £50k to play with though I'd have made it a Big Brother bribe show - and seen how much cash each HM would take to quit a week before the final. Whoever took the lowest gets evicted.

[Matt]

Originally posted by mozzymozmoz

were you an only child?

What does that have to do with anything?

The entire night was pointless and predictable. They could have done something so much better.

So yeah, whilst I'm pleased Lisa and Sara won something, I think they could have done something better with the shows.

Oh and by the way, no, I'm not going to stop watching, and no, I'm not going to stop "pretending to like Big Brother" - I, as a viewer, have a right to criticise what I watch, and on this occasion, I don't like it what they've done.

[mozzymozmoz]

blatent golden balls rip off eh... i think you need to read this:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Prisoner's_dilemma


never staisfied. you have had 10 weeks of normality, so what if tehre is a break in the chain for the LAST nomination of the series. no matter what happens, people like you, will always complain about something.

[dylissimo]

Yes - maybe then people would have had the guts to nominate Darnell.

The way he treats people and he gets ONE nomination. But Sara and Lisa get 4/5 just because they're not in "the group".

[mozzymozmoz]

Originally posted by Matt
Originally posted by mozzymozmoz

were you an only child?

What does that have to do with anything?

The entire night was pointless and predictable. They could have done something so much better.

So yeah, whilst I'm pleased Lisa and Sara won something, I think they could have done something better with the shows.

Oh and by the way, no, I'm not going to stop watching, and no, I'm not going to stop "pretending to like Big Brother" - I, as a viewer, have a right to criticise what I watch, and on this occasion, I don't like it what they've done.


because only children are sterotyped as spoilt. And i say sterotyped there.

as a viewer, you have the right to critisize that, aswell with every other highlight show this series according to everybodys behoviour on here.

it used to be a place where everybody talked about the issues in the house, not "THAT WAS RUBBISH!"

And saying they could have done so much better, thats shallow.
with that attitude i could say:
they could have done bb so much better and only let them out when they are breaking down. but then everyone would complain as usual.

[gavinh2008]

I thought it was so much better, more suspenseful it had my heart racing when they were nominating

[mozzymozmoz]

finnaly, another person that agrees.
=D

[Brekkie]

What they needed to do was tell the housemates the 50k was at stake before they nominated. That would have thrown a spanner in the works and made the nominations alot less predictable - would they go for people they want out, or people they want to win cash?


And in that scenario I can't predict who would be nominated - which would have made the whole thing so much better. I think though all the girls would definately have shared, as would Mikey (There's a point - I doubt the blocks were prepared with him in mind!).

Darnell I think it depends who he was against, but I think he'd share. Rex is the only one with the balls to take the cash and not care about the consequences. Mo was ineligible of course, but it would be interesting to see if he lived up to his "greedy Mo" name when it came to cash.



But hey, they didn't do that so we got predictable noms and a predictable outcome to the twist.