PDA

View Full Version : Tonight's The Night!!


Amy
20-07-2004, 07:55 AM
Looks like last night Michelle got her man :bored: ....

This is on the Official BB Website....



Michelle got serious in her quest for some lovvin' tonight using every trick in the book to get Stu exactly where she wanted him.

But if the former sheriff thought he was off to some classy location for a night of passion, he was sadly mistaken. Michelle's notion of a perfect venue is...

Under the dining room table!



and....


So, finally, he crawled in.

"Have I made it cosy?" she purred, pulling the stools in after her like a trapdoor spider sealing its lair.

"Are you just up for talking for a bit?" stuttered the desperate boy.

"Yeah," she whispered assuringly.

What followed was an hour's worth of muffled gasps, moans, some very intense toe curling and the odd whimper, followed, rather suddenly, by the emergence of a bedraggled Stu. Michelle followed soon after, beaming!




Oh dear :bored:

For the full article Official Website (http://bigbrother.channel4.com/bigbrother/news/newsstory.jsp?id=6507)

BusyBee
20-07-2004, 08:21 AM
OH MY GOD - that's what comes of refusing to 'marry' her. She really is showing herself up now.

ribbonstring5145
20-07-2004, 08:46 AM
i dont think they did it...stuart wouldnt have let that happen

rachb
20-07-2004, 08:50 AM
I hope they didn't:nono::nono::nono: for the sake of their poor families:nono:

JC
20-07-2004, 09:57 AM
I was watching last night, but I didn't see that. I either missed that part, or E4 decided to hastily show something else. Last I saw Stu and Michelle, they were sat on the sofas with Jay and Vic. I got the impression they were going to bed. Stu looked more nervous than usual last night though, perhaps he saw it coming? :hugesmile:

She Devil
20-07-2004, 10:24 AM
JC it happened just after the party finished. Nadia and Shell had gone to bed and the jcs were the only ones about. Michelle has confided in Shell about what went on but the sound dipped. She did say that she thinks Stuart will be cross if he found out that she was spilling the beans.

JC
20-07-2004, 10:29 AM
Can't imagine Stu ever getting cross about anything! You think it might have been all that talk about strippers that made Michelle decide to "claim" Stu there and then? :hugesmile:

She Devil
20-07-2004, 10:38 AM
Yeah it probably made her all horny

bananarama
20-07-2004, 10:39 AM
Michelle is just brilliant. An artist at her work.:laugh:

If Stuart aint up to Michelle and her games then she should say to him what she said to Ahmad. "Why are you here" "Why do you come to a place like this"

"Now be a good little boy and play by Michelle's rules".....:laugh:

She is a deserving winner.......But sadly it won't happen as long as nicotine Nell and Slapper Dan and godfather Victor are still there...:mad:

kaphc
20-07-2004, 10:45 AM
Oh dear ... I think I prefered them having a row!

Stu, you've lost your chance of winning back the British public mate!

Michelle, your chance was gone already!

p2pnut
20-07-2004, 11:13 AM
SadSack ex-Schoolboy Stu Seduced by Scheming Saucy Slapper Sensation

........ or not, as the case may be .........

JC
20-07-2004, 01:16 PM
from the official site:
About Last Night...
Day 54, 10:45
Tuesday 20 July

Michelle has hinted that she and Stuart did more than just kiss and cuddle under the table last night.

Despite having promised Stuart she would say nothing on the matter, the brazen brunette, grinning from ear to ear, asked Shell this morning if she was any good at "talking in code".

And what followed suggested that neither were particularly good at talking in code, given that it was pretty clear that they were discussing Michelle and Stuart's 'romantic' session under the dining room table last night.

"I'm not allowed to talk about it," giggled Michelle, raising the question of why she'd bothered to bring it up in the first place.

But Shell was anxious to know just what happened when, last night, Michelle finally managed to get her man into the private den she'd built under the table.

"He made me promise," she explained her determination to remain 'silent' on the subject.

She managed to stick to her promise for all of about three seconds.

Sorry chick, I'm sworn to secrecy... but...


When Shell asked if her "immune system" felt "boosted this morning", Michelle giggled and announced, "Yes, it is."

Shell pursued the coded line of questioning by quizzing Michelle as to whether she'd "taken the Echinacea supplements" herself or whether someone had "given them to [her]".

"Someone else may have given them to me!" she answered.

"Did he use a tool to give it to you or did he use his hands?" continued Shell.

"A tool," Michelle giggled.

"SERIOUSLY?" squealed Shell.

"We're talking about Echinacea," Michelle added hastily, "But yeah..."

Hmmm....

Hooly One
20-07-2004, 02:54 PM
What a harlot!:joker:

bananarama
20-07-2004, 02:57 PM
That will teach him for trying to protect his inner self what ever that is......:hugesmile:

Hooly One
20-07-2004, 03:05 PM
:joker:

kaphc
20-07-2004, 06:43 PM
Question: Why were Michelle and Stu allowed to create a den that the cameras could not see into?

Surely that's not allowed in the BB house. I remember in BB1 when Sada and Caroline made a screen to get dressed and undressed behind, they were told to take it down.

It's not that I want to see Michelle behaving like a slapper again, it's that I want to know why Big Brother allowed it?

bananarama
20-07-2004, 06:50 PM
Well spotted kaphc but remember BB can change the rules when ever they want......:laugh:

Next years BB will run for 10 months instead of ten weeks and will include a a couple of midwives. :laugh:

BusyBee
20-07-2004, 07:51 PM
I too couldnt work out why they let Michelle get away with making her den. But then perhaps they wanted something to happen.

Kore
20-07-2004, 07:53 PM
yeah but us, the viewers wouldnt have seen it :laugh:
(under the covors is better):thumbs::laugh:

golden~rose
20-07-2004, 07:54 PM
very interesting...id rather watch jason exercise!!!

p2pnut
21-07-2004, 08:22 AM
It's possible that even Michelle (The Pouting Predator) has realised that her ability to mesmerise/bully Stu into submission is starting to fade - after all he had just refused to 'marry' her.

Hatching the plot to lure her chicken into the love nest was down to her desire to lay the Golden Egg of notoriety (or grab the Sun's £20,000) while she still had the chance.

However, the Seductive Slut's need to provide Stu with privacy may well backfire on her ....... who's to say whether the ensuing saucy sound track was due (in any way) to Stu's efforts - or was simply the result of Mucky Michelle playing in her own Lady's Garden ........... ???????

:xyxwave:

xx_michelle_fan_xx
21-07-2004, 09:35 AM
stu knew what was going to happen when he craweld under the table...as michelle whispered to him in the garden ... so she didnt exactly force him to go under there :laugh:

She Devil
21-07-2004, 09:38 AM
I only seen this on the 10 show, so it was obviously editted. From what I saw i really didn't like. Stuart said NO to Michelle about getting under the table when she first asked and she went of in a strop to bed. Why did she persist and go and make a den after Stu had said NO. Can't Michelle take NO for an answer.

I'm sorry but if it had been the other way round and Stu was pestering Michelle, wouldn't this be classed as some kind of rape.

You could see in Stus eyes he really didn't want this and he has been saying he didn't want this since the harlot got her claws into him.

And if he did say YES to her then it's because he felt cornered after her stroppy behaviour over this bride/groom issue.

xx_michelle_fan_xx
21-07-2004, 09:45 AM
stu didnt want it under the table i know .... becoz after it all he went to go to bed and stood outside like he regretted it :rolleyes:

She Devil
21-07-2004, 09:50 AM
Michelle is a spoilt child that throws a major strop if she doesn't get her own way. If she says she is falling in love with Stuart then she is going the wrong way to keep him.

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 12:28 PM
Originally posted by She Devil
I'm sorry but if it had been the other way round and Stu was pestering Michelle, wouldn't this be classed as some kind of rape.

What are you on about?

She Devil
21-07-2004, 12:44 PM
He really didn't want to have sex in the BB house and Michelle pushed him into it.

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 12:53 PM
Smaller words...

Originally posted by She Devil
I'm sorry but if it had been the other way round and Stu was pestering Michelle, wouldn't this be classed as some kind of rape.

No, it wouldn't.

She Devil
21-07-2004, 12:56 PM
Thanx for answering Deux. It was a question not a fact I was stating there.

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 12:59 PM
Hint: Use question marks for questions.

She Devil
21-07-2004, 01:03 PM
I will in future BOSS

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 01:04 PM
Ta.

She Devil
21-07-2004, 01:10 PM
Your welcome

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 01:16 PM
Yo - full stops are pretty handy, too.

She Devil
21-07-2004, 01:17 PM
Who are you my teacher????????????????????????????

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 01:18 PM
Well, are you learning anything?

She Devil
21-07-2004, 01:21 PM
Sweetheart it has been over 20 years that i was at school so i don't want to be lectured on something i enjoy doing. I don't come on here to be told how to either spell or correct my grammer. I come here for a healthy debate.

Deus Ex Machina
21-07-2004, 01:22 PM
'since', not 'that' ;o)

She Devil
21-07-2004, 01:24 PM
:mad:

bananarama
21-07-2004, 04:30 PM
It's all a wind up to hopefully keep the viewers wanting to watch them.....

If they are lucky they may have tricked the media into paying the £50,000 promised for the first ever.

The bookies have paid out. More fool them......:devil:

golden~rose
21-07-2004, 05:35 PM
i dont care who lead who on but personally they make me sick, especially michelle!!!

rachb
21-07-2004, 05:39 PM
I think that they are both adults and both knew what they were doing. It shows that they don't really have that much respect for each other if they can do this or even pretend to do this if it didn't really happen.
I'm sure there are two sets of parents who are not feeling very proud at the moment.

bananarama
21-07-2004, 06:11 PM
I agree there is no point blaming one and not the other. Sexism being rampant the girl always get's the blame more than the man.

I think Michelle's parent were probably well aware of what their daughter would get up to. If she is liberated in there with millions watching then she must have shown the same tendencies at home too. So i don't think they will be surprised.

Stuarts parents don't have all that much to be concerned with. What did we all see exactly. A table cloth and a pair of feet.

Jason relieving himself was more disgusting than anything Stuart and Michelle have portrayed.

One factor that will soon sooth away any embarresment from the parents is when the money starts rolling in from their stories in the press. All will be forgiven and forgotten...:laugh::laugh:

ribbonstring5145
22-07-2004, 10:13 PM
looks like they did do it. before they went into the love shack after the wedding, stuart asked jason for condoms. :shocked:

Sticks
22-07-2004, 10:34 PM
That was more a wind up from Jason.

As for Stuart's reluctance under to get the table, it could be that the idea of being on a hard floor would not be that confortable, (guessing here :blush: ), where as the snug is more designed for that and so no reluctance.

One thing I must point out, which was actually pointed out by my client, Miss Bass, the wedding task was an obvious set up of Michelle and Stuart. We have seen Endemol / Channel 4 stoop to cheap tacky opportunism before with the Meals for two on BB2. They expected serious action from Helen and Paul, but they were foiled when my then client, Mr Clarke spotted this dastardly scheme and prevented anything from happening.

One point I must make in my client's defence, is that by the creation of the dens under the table or in the snug, she was trying to accommodate Mr Wilson by making a hiding place from the cameras. Remember both were willing participants here.

It now seems that my client has become public enemy number one, but had this been the other way around, the man would have been seen in a more favourable light. This is a total double standard. One is reminded of the story in the eigth chapter of the Gospel of John about the women taken in adultary. That offence takes two, and yet they did not bring the MAN before Jesus to have him stoned to death.

My client has committed no crime or caused any personal harm to those who are hurling abuse at her. This is totally uncalled for. :mad:

Hooly One
23-07-2004, 12:38 AM
Originally posted by ribbonstring5145
looks like they did do it. before they went into the love shack after the wedding, stuart asked jason for condoms. :shocked:

Yes it doesn't take a Rocket scientist to figure out what really happened.:hugesmile: