will rachel win big brother???

[Dance2Night]

Rachel is crying on big brother live right now while she packs Kats suitcase
I really like her and I think she deserves to win
She is a kind, sweet person with a good heart and i think 80% like that

Rachel to win or if not mikey

[gavinh2008]

Yes I want Rachel to win and i think she will
Bless her

[30stone]

Yeh why not shes not done anything wrong to hate her other than a few.

bit boring is why i prefer sara but rachel for second though i think shes a good chance of first

so ill put yer.

[Jackie]

Hopefully:thumbs2:

[LewiisTreleaven]

She deserves it more than ANyone in there

[Roberus]

She's okay. Agree she's a bit dull and not the sharpest knife in the drawer (considering she's a trainee teacher or summat!!) but maybe that's a bit of an act.

At least Sara's got more about her but not sure she can win due to how she tends to treat Darnell who himself is a true oddball!

I reckon Mikey may win if Rachel doesn't.

[dcp42]

I hope not! Another fake actress! She soon got over her 'best fwend' being evicted though didn't she - piling on the slap 'just in case' they were back on with Davina!

[Captain.Remy]

Message original : LewiisTreleaven
She deserves it more than ANyone in there

What has she done then ? Just tell me because I'm confused.

[ange7]

No ... she's done NOTHING very very DULL human ... she hasn't been active ...just reactive. ie the only time I recall her at all is when she reacts to something someone else did to her eg Rex attacks for being boring... Bex attacks for being boring ... Rex attacks for being 2 faced. She didn't actually do anything ... she kept her head down the whole 14 weeks under the radar. oh and don't call those attacks bullying ... they were always one on one.
No sorry cannot support Rachel ever....she tries too hard to be seen to be saintly
http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/media/images/Channel4/bigbrother9/day32/evening/gallery/bb9_d32_raingallery_2A.jpg

[Roberus]

Agree.....at least Sara has a character!!

[Sunny_01]

I think she will win, she has been consistent right through the show so no reason why she shouldnt.

[Cody™]

She'd be the most undeserving winner till date.

[Marc]

I think her or Mikey will win, but meh yeah Rachel hasn't been that exciting

[ange7]

Originally posted by Sunny_01
I think she will win, she has been consistent right through the show so no reason why she shouldnt.
yeah when did "consistency" become a measure of whether someone should win bb?... not that Sara hasn't been consistent but Rache was consistently been a wall flower.
Go Sara
http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/media/images/Channel4/bigbrother9/d36/morning/gallery/beautybeast/bb9_d36_1220_saramaydarnell2_a.jpg

[CbgAndy]

i hope so.


however, i will be surprised , albeit very happily , if she won

[xXxCharlottexXx]

No. I would be happy if she finished somewhere in the top 3, but it would be a travesty if she beats Rex.

[karezza]

Fake Rach is the worst of the lot - she is a sly little actress.

If you vote for her you will regret it.:pat:

[NettoSuperstar!]

Lets hope not, shes done nothing absolutley nothing but avoid getting nominated! Oh yeh big cheers for the bore! This is mental and if you want to avoid the biggest dissapointment of the year you have to vote for Sara! she is the only one that can beat her! And why does Sara deserve it more you may ask! Because shes got a PERSONALITY!

[lolipop]

Originally posted by bbE
Lets hope not, shes done nothing absolutley nothing but avoid getting nominated! Oh yeh big cheers for the bore! This is mental and if you want to avoid the biggest dissapointment of the year you have to vote for Sara! she is the only one that can beat her! And why does Sara deserve it more you may ask! Because shes got a PERSONALITY! high five what a:sleep: fest that would be

[robb]

I'd like to see her win, but don't think she will. She was genuinely upset by kat's exit last nite. She tried to stay strong in front of rex and co. She's a really nice girl, as us with any sense have thought all along. Another nail in loopy luke's coffin. But sara will probably win on the sympathy votes she will get (thanks to darnell and rex). Other than that, sara would have gone when up against lisa last week.

[robb]

Sara has a split personality....she can't even decide which bloke she likes in the House :thumbs2:Stu or dale or rex or darnell...........she even flirted with mikey to get him on-side...............I DESPISE REX, but would prefer HIM to win than part-time, 4 weeks late sara...............

[xERFx]

Originally posted by robb
Sara has a split personality....she can't even decide which bloke she likes in the House :thumbs2:Stu or dale or rex or darnell...........she even flirted with mikey to get him on-side...............I DESPISE REX, but would prefer HIM to win than part-time, 4 weeks late sara...............


She dosnt have a split personality just cos she flirts why is that such a bad trait:rolleyes:

[razorbladeromance]

Being a nice person is not enough. For those complaining about boring characters who have won the show despite doing nothing, dont make this happen again.

Judging on Big Brother being an entertainment show, their is no way, NO way she deserves to win AT all.

She is a nice person. So what? I bet they all are deep down. Who cares. She is as dull as dishwater.

[Dan_]

Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

[rayheartbliss]

Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

[AngRemembered]

Originally posted by rayheartbliss
Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

:wink::thumbs:

[AngRemembered]

When did we see a HL show with Rachel asleep?

When has BB warned the HOH to keep everyone awake and its been because Rachel has dozed off?

Rex definately Darnell occasionally Mikey a few times, Sara once.. for an "entertainment" show sleepers make the HIGH LIGHTS!!!!!!
Why is Rachel so boring, whatever she is doing whilst not being dead to the world like her other finalists, its sure gotta be better than that.

What is boring about being yourself?, I notice similarities between the tibb game Eliminator and its live feed, and every day Rachel...
They/We managed a grand total of 404 ish pages of every day conversation, it was popular and rightly so, as it involved everyone just being themselves, I cant recall anyone refusing to vote in that game as a contestant was simply "boring", indeed the eventual winner was just that, and every day nice guy called Marc, not a stand up comic, not a singer, and not the next James Bond either, you could say he was boring like Rachel, but I and the people who voted in the game thought he was a genuinely nice guy who loved the game and made the effort.

The truth is none of them are entertaining, name one ex HM who has toured the UK and released an album, name one filling Hackney empire with his/her stand up routine, olympic winner anyone? anthing apart from still pics in a mag anyone?
The show and the clash of differing personalities is the entertainment, not the individuals they are ALL notoriously ordinary if not boring.
Just like our eliminator game, ordinary people chatting ordinary things, treating there peers with honest respect, but thoroughly enjoying the experience, and as they will agree fabulously entertaining a game it was.

My theory is boring has a new definition on tibb, it means "I cant think of any reason to dislike" and because we dont have to entertain on this forum, its so much easier to type the word boring instead of thinking of a real unique reason, especially when it comes to someone with a "nice" personality like Rachel.

What I cant understand is..why?

[rayheartbliss]

of course shel win

[Dan_]

Originally posted by rayheartbliss
Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

It wouldn't still be on tv if it was just to provide a social experiment rather than entertainment.

[rayheartbliss]

but the entertainment just goes a long...
they dont put entertainers in the house...they pick up people from the streets...
thats why being entertaining doesnt make you a winner..if your ugly inside!

[BBkid]

I think she'll be 2nd or 3rd.

[Dan_]

They go through an audition process and they pick out the people that they think the public will be interested in, you're not going to just watch a social experiment involving people that barely add anything worthy of talking about.

For me it's got be a combination of entertainment and liking the person to actually bother to vote for them.Rachel might be a really nice person but there's nothing else that she's done to really stand enough for me to bother to pick up the phone and use my money to vote for her to win.

[AngRemembered]

Originally posted by Dan_
They go through an audition process and they pick out the people that they think the public will be interested in, you're not going to just watch a social experiment involving people that barely add anything worthy of talking about.

For me it's got be a combination of entertainment and liking the person to actually bother to vote for them.Rachel might be a really nice person but there's nothing else that she's done to really stand enough for me to bother to pick up the phone and use my money to vote for her to win.

so what have the others done so differnetly to be worthy and entertaining individuals.

To help you we'll include every series, and you name one who's individual entertainment qualities have given them a career in the entertainment world and sustained it over a period of time.
Even the master of all z list nobodies Max Clifford has struggled to get careers going for some of them, but if winners of BB were purely picked on level of entertaining then you wont be struggling to name one "mega star"

will you?

[cutekidxox]

rachel 2 win wooooo =]:bouncy:

[bee-ash]

Originally posted by cutekidxox
rachel 2 win wooooo =]:bouncy:

[Dan_]

Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by Dan_
They go through an audition process and they pick out the people that they think the public will be interested in, you're not going to just watch a social experiment involving people that barely add anything worthy of talking about.

For me it's got be a combination of entertainment and liking the person to actually bother to vote for them.Rachel might be a really nice person but there's nothing else that she's done to really stand enough for me to bother to pick up the phone and use my money to vote for her to win.

so what have the others done so differnetly to be worthy and entertaining individuals.

To help you we'll include every series, and you name one who's individual entertainment qualities have given them a career in the entertainment world and sustained it over a period of time.
Even the mast of all z list nobodies Max Clifford has struggled to get careers going for some of them, but if winners of BB were purely picked on level of entertaining then you wont be struggling to name one "mega star"

will you?

For me,Mikey is someone that I do find entertaining to watch and also likeable.What I find entertaining about him is honesty and ability to just tell it like it is.At times I've also found him to be very funny, there's just certain things he does like with eating the chilli that make me laugh.I guess you either find someone interesting to watch or not.

Brian Dowling has done tv presenting for quite a few years but other than that nothing much of note.Obviously being an entertaining housemate, that people find interesting to watch is different from actually having a talent to sustain a career in the business though.Whilst they might have a personality that people find interesting to watch on a show like Big Brother, there's not a whole that they can do from just that alone.

[AirWalk]

Originally posted by rayheartbliss
but the entertainment just goes a long...
they dont put entertainers in the house...they pick up people from the streets...
thats why being entertaining doesnt make you a winner..if your ugly inside!
Well said mate :thumbs:

[AngRemembered]

Originally posted by Dan_


Brian Dowling has done tv presenting for quite a few years but other than that nothing much of note.Obviously being an entertaining housemate, that people find interesting to watch is different from actually having a talent to sustain a career in the business though.Whilst they might have a personality that people find interesting to watch on a show like Big Brother, there's not a whole that they can do from just that alone.

I really appreciate your time in answering Dan, thanks. and
I agree Mikey is another natural "in the game for experience" likeable guy (with some bad habits) I see him exactly like Rachel et al.

Thats my point, what makes Rachel so different, in this histeria to prove her boring almost like its an offence:shrug:
They (non extreme dislikeable charectors) are all as boring or entertaining as each other on a social expirement made for entertainment purposes.
The star of the show is the concept itself as Rayheartbliss said, and I agree with your answer to Brian Dowling too (another likeable man if nothing else) and another exaple individual entertainment qualities are not the criteria one looks for to be successful in BB.

[razorbladeromance]

Originally posted by rayheartbliss
Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...
No it is not. It has not been a social experiment since series 2.

[ListenSon]

the british public aint mugs

they can see the girls a joke. She might not be fake but shes still a pillock, shes boring man!!!

darnell should win it or mikey

[Jackie]

Racheal stands a chance of winning.

[DeonLime]

I think is a 40 - 40 between Sara and Rachel. I´ll give Rex 15 % and Mikey 5 %. Darnell is out.

[trasadkel]

Originally posted by rayheartbliss
Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

Totally agree. I am bemused as to who seriously thinks that she deserves to win. In terms of entertainment she has been totally non existant.

[ListenSon]

rachell dont deserve to win shes a nob

:flower:

[xFAITHx]

Originally posted by LewiisTreleaven
She deserves it more than ANyone in there

Why?