Log in

View Full Version : This year's winner was better than last year's...


officialleafan
06-09-2008, 02:02 PM
I just thought i'd like to remind you critics about last year's finale.

Most of the forums thought the twins would win, in fact...i was certain they would, as where many others.

But they didn't, and it kind of ruined the final for me...this year was a shock. I was certain Mikey would win...and he didn't.

I must say, Rachel was a far better winner than Brian last year. She was nice, and didn't have a bad bone in her body. Brian was...thick. And he won...No, Rachel was by far the better winner.

Arneldo
06-09-2008, 02:03 PM
In your opinion.

At least Brian actually DID somthing suring his time in the house.

Dal1966
06-09-2008, 02:03 PM
Originally posted by officialleafan
I just thought i'd like to remind you critics about last year's finale.

Most of the forums thought the twins would win, in fact...i was certain they would, as where many others.

But they didn't, and it kind of ruined the final for me...this year was a shock. I was certain Mikey would win...and he didn't.

I must say, Rachel was a far better winner than Brian last year. She was nice, and didn't have a bad bone in her body. Brian was...thick. And he won...No, Rachel was by far the better winner.

I totally agree,

:thumbs:

Adamw92
06-09-2008, 02:05 PM
I agree, i hated Brian he was so fake, the dumb thing was so put on, at least Rachel didnt pretend to be dumb

officialleafan
06-09-2008, 02:06 PM
Originally posted by Arneldo
In your opinion.

At least Brian actually DID somthing suring his time in the house.

But then Rachel is called fake, but she had to of done something to be called fake...if that makes sense.

NettoSuperstar!
06-09-2008, 02:12 PM
worst winner ever more like

AngRemembered
06-09-2008, 02:12 PM
Originally posted by officialleafan
Originally posted by Arneldo
In your opinion.

At least Brian actually DID somthing suring his time in the house.

But then Rachel is called fake, but she had to of done something to be called fake...if that makes sense.

makes perfect sense, to do "nothing" for 13 weeks with 48 different cameras on you 24/7 is something almost impossible, and untill I heard the the "fact" Rachel had done nothing I would have sworn it was actually impossible to do absolutely nothing.
How on earth did she become HOH if she done nothing.
Oh well, as I say now, to do nothing for 13 weeks is an achievement in its own right as its ..well difficult to actually do.

robb
06-09-2008, 02:13 PM
Yeah, here here!!! The twins propped brian up last year. He would have just skulked about the house otherwise, as he did on many occasions anyway. Rachel was supportive to so many people. I feel she will be a cool ambassador for BB, RATHER THAN THE WANABEES she beat. :xyxwave:

KKBL
06-09-2008, 02:15 PM
Brian was the second most entertaining HM of his series Rachel was the 21st most entertaining HM from her series.Brian is a better winner and im sure the majority of the general public willa gree with me.

Adamw92
06-09-2008, 02:19 PM
More like Brian was the 10th best housemate of his series and Rachel was like the 5th, if the public make good decisions then Mikey would have been 5th or 4th and not 2nd

AngRemembered
06-09-2008, 02:23 PM
Originally posted by KKBL
Brian was the second most entertaining HM of his series Rachel was the 21st most entertaining HM from her series.Brian is a better winner and Im sure the majority of the general public willa gree with me.


well the majority of the viewing BB public obviously didnt agree.

You seriously dont think Rachel was less entertaining than Alex and Dennis.. and what of Maysoon who walked out?
Stuart who moped about wanting to be evicted? and Dale who was only exited when being evicted?
How can any of these who didnt enjoy the experience have been more entertaining, imagine a house full of these charectors, we would never have seen week 5 let alone week 13.

peacemaker
06-09-2008, 02:43 PM
rachel is the worst winner of bb history, people say rachel isn't fake, she can't do an act for 12 weeks, well this time last year brian did an act for 10 weeks so it isn't impossible, i honestly don't know if rachel was fake or not but she did nothing to deserve winning apart from being kind & nice but anyone can do that
at least brian did something & was funny despite being "fake", he's nowhere near the worst winner of bb, it's rachel

Adamw92
06-09-2008, 02:45 PM
Originally posted by peacemaker
rachel is the worst winner of bb history, people say rachel isn't fake, she can't do an act for 12 weeks, well this time last year brian did an act for 10 weeks so it isn't impossible, i honestly don't know if rachel was fake or not but she did nothing to deserve winning apart from being kind & nice but anyone can do that
at least brian did something & was funny despite being "fake", he's nowhere near the worst winner of bb, it's rachel

Sorry no the title of worst winner goes to Cameron from Big Brother 4

officialleafan
06-09-2008, 03:14 PM
I for one am glad that Rachel won, i mean, a woman actually won...it's been an amazing finale.

peacemaker
06-09-2008, 03:28 PM
i agree it was good to see a female winner but wouldn't you have prefered if it was someone like jen, steph or sara, it's better than boring rachel?

MrGaryy
06-09-2008, 04:06 PM
YES! By far Rachel was a MUCH better winner than Brian!

Billy
06-09-2008, 04:08 PM
Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by KKBL
Brian was the second most entertaining HM of his series Rachel was the 21st most entertaining HM from her series.Brian is a better winner and Im sure the majority of the general public willa gree with me.


well the majority of the viewing BB public obviously didnt agree.

You seriously dont think Rachel was less entertaining than Alex and Dennis.. and what of Maysoon who walked out?
Stuart who moped about wanting to be evicted? and Dale who was only exited when being evicted?
How can any of these who didnt enjoy the experience have been more entertaining, imagine a house full of these charectors, we would never have seen week 5 let alone week 13.

And a house full of Rachels wouldn't have seen Launch Night.

Wildcat!
06-09-2008, 04:11 PM
Originally posted by peacemaker
i agree it was good to see a female winner but wouldn't you have prefered if it was someone like jen, steph or sara, it's better than boring rachel?

ermm, no, no and hell no!!!

Nutters22000
06-09-2008, 04:19 PM
Theres just no pleasing some people:devil:

Brian = well deserved winner.
Rachel = well deserved winner.

AngRemembered
06-09-2008, 04:25 PM
Originally posted by Billy21
Originally posted by Angiebabe
Originally posted by KKBL
Brian was the second most entertaining HM of his series Rachel was the 21st most entertaining HM from her series.Brian is a better winner and Im sure the majority of the general public willa gree with me.


well the majority of the viewing BB public obviously didnt agree.

You seriously dont think Rachel was less entertaining than Alex and Dennis.. and what of Maysoon who walked out?
Stuart who moped about wanting to be evicted? and Dale who was only exited when being evicted?
How can any of these who didnt enjoy the experience have been more entertaining, imagine a house full of these charectors, we would never have seen week 5 let alone week 13.

And a house full of Rachels wouldn't have seen Launch Night.

we had a house full of Rachels, on launch nite, ordinary people with nothing special about any of them.

One by one those deciding to be threatening and or violent were eliminated (surely your not suggesting thats good familly entertainment?)
we were left with those that be moaned and whinged about the show they auditioned for (again thats real dull TV don't you think?)
Rachel may not be scintilating exitement, neither are the others but at least she enjoyed the show, loved the people she got on well with (most of them) and treated everyone with respect, rachel could have been anyone on this very forum, decent, normal and respectful to others (she did a better job of it than me and most here too) that makes her a worthy winner.
We have a house full of Rachel (charector likes) within tibb's forum yet its you who keep returning i just wonder whats the attraction if you honestly believe BB would have struggled so much.
Again I say if we had a tibb forum full of Alex or Dennis (charector lights) the place would'nt be anywhere near a success if at all running.

Fom
06-09-2008, 04:29 PM
Any of the housemates this year could of beat Brian! I would even prefer Maysoon over Brian. I hate him with a passion, and still do.

Nutters22000
06-09-2008, 04:32 PM
Originally posted by Fom
Any of the housemates this year could of beat Brian! I would even prefer Maysoon over Brian. I hate him with a passion, and still do.


Pretty stupid statement. you must be an immature Baffoon:kiss:

jcdub
06-09-2008, 04:54 PM
I love how you differentiate him from her by saying that HE is thick.