Unlimited

[andyman]

... What does unlimited mean?

[Lauren]

There is no limit?

(I might have missed a deeper question LOL)

[andyman]

Usage policy applies= unlimited? Yep the net and phone..

[Lauren]

OOOH I get it now. I genuinely thought you were asking for a general definition :sad: Hahahah.


Yeah, my ISP is "unlimited" but there's a fair use policy attached to it. Somewhat pointless because sometimes the amount til it gets into "unfair" use is less than some of the limited packages they give.


For example:
Package 1: Unlimited (but caps at about 10gb per day for example)
Package 2: Not unlimited. (but it's set at 15gb per day).

Furthermore, LOL I said package. :joker:

[andyman]

Lol you do like a good package :tongue:
So really its not unlimited if the true meaning of the word means no limit... The clearly do have a limit.
I demand a truely unlimited service if the word means no limits, quick ring the police and tell em! :bigsmile: has to be a crime.

[Lauren]

If I remember correctly, BT are requesting from the government the ability to install fibre internet cables underground which will provide fast internet the most homes. If this goes ahead I imagine we'll start getting truly unlimited PACKAGES. But given the current financial climate, I can't imagine the Government will pass this too soon.

packagepackagepackage.

[andyman]

It wont be cheap for us, but then again its worth the extra cost for more speed... We talking about a HUGE PACKAGE with the cost?

[andyman]

Guest replying to thread?
Guest posting?... :shrug:

[Lauren]

Originally posted by andyman
It wont be cheap for us, but then again its worth the extra cost for more speed... We talking about a HUGE PACKAGE with the cost?

Yeah, it won't be cheap for the government too, because they have to pay for the wires to be put in place so that we can get a MASSIVE PACKAGE.

Edit: The guest thing is just a case of cookies being all muddled.

[andyman]

Whats a GIANT PACKAGE to the government, i dont mind paying bit extra tax... Few pence at the most :bouncy:

Guests are cookies???

[Lauren]

It's basically an invest on the part of the Government, so we can't pay taxes on it, cos not everyone will use it. But I imagine once the financial crisis is over it'll be paid and we will be provided with our highly-sought after LARGE PACKAGE.


Also, yes, chocolate chip.

[andyman]

Ha! I knew the guests are government spies! They aint tracking my brain down.. Nooooo way.
Well we all want super fast internet speeds and the uk needs it, very bad! Some parts of the uk is very poor and the wi-fi thing aint too great, 3G is much better. But people should have that ENORMOUS PACKAGE, its our right, we demand an ENORMOUS PACKAGE today!

[Lauren]

Yes, I'm with you. Enormous packages for all!

[andyman]

I have posted on word association but its not shown in todays posts, the thread will not be known by new members.. But still keep it where it is but still be shown in todays posts.

[andyman]

But would a GIGANTIC PACKAGE be better, some might need an MONSTEROUS PACKAGE for their needs, and people have needs.

[andyman]

Do you have a big smile on your face when you see the post man with a big package? :whistle:

[Lauren]

Originally posted by andyman
Do you have a big smile on your face when you see the post man with a big package? :whistle:

Hahah, at least our other innuendos related to the topic somewhat :tongue: This was just out-there suggestion!
But yes, he brings me them all the time.

[lily.]

I worry.

[andyman]

Originally posted by Linda
I worry. About the fall of constantinople? Me too! I thought i was the only one :bigsmile:

[Hugo]

I don't get computer stuff :sad:

[andyman]

Originally posted by HUGO
I don't get computer stuff :sad: Its more about the lie about unlimited when they aply an "usage policy applies" then its not truely "unlimited" if the word means no-limits, when clearly there is a limit so the word unlimited should not be used.

[lily.]

It's typical though, isn't it.. false advertising Andy.

Oh, and I worry about you and Loz and the obsession with the packages. lol

[andyman]

Originally posted by Linda
It's typical though, isn't it.. false advertising Andy.

Oh, and I worry about you and Loz and the obsession with the packages. lol You must like having a big package tho, i do. I have had a small package before but it does not meet my needs that a huge package can offer. :bouncy:

[MarkWaldorf]

Originally posted by HUGO
I don't get computer stuff :sad:

I'm confused too :sad:

[lily.]

Originally posted by andyman
Originally posted by Linda
It's typical though, isn't it.. false advertising Andy.

Oh, and I worry about you and Loz and the obsession with the packages. lol You must like having a big package tho, i do. I have had a small package before but it does not meet my needs that a huge package can offer. :bouncy:

I generally find that the size of the package is not as important as the content.

Sometimes bigger packages are a disapointment.

And, often a small to medium package can bring all kinds of delights.

You really can't generalise when it comes to packages. But as long as it fulfils the needs of the recipient, then the size of it is irrelevant.

[Lauren]

Packages can bring about them much debate.