Fat Director Sacks female worker as she would not let him bonk her

[arista]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1162610/City-boss-sacked-director-refused-date-him.html





http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/03/17/article-1162610-03F18B9A000005DC-439_224x423.jpg
Guy Oppenheim Executive
wanted to bonk her.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/03/17/article-1162610-03EF6790000005DC-130_224x423.jpg

But Sexy Nadine did not want the Fat Director on top of her.
Wise Lady.




"The tribunal heard how Mr Oppenheim, who is married, sexually harassed 36-year-old Miss Nassar for more than a year, continually pestering her for dates."



Typical Executive.



Life In The City.

[Ninastar]

oh dear. . .

[andyman]

Bet she is a naughty lady.. Maybe, maybe not..
She will get £100,000,000 for her pain... And she is a miss! She could be the "other woman" that many women fear when their hubby is away.

[arista]

The Fat Director
was Married , andyman
he is a Dirty Stinking Git.


He just wanted her Knickers Down


Life In The City.

[andyman]

Thats life in the city for you then.

But maybe she is the skank! Hey they both could be skanks, maybe only weapon she has is sex? She will move onto another married man.. Maybe or maybe not!

[arista]

You are Wrong
He was Old School
and Dirty as hell.


Nadine is a Nice Lady.

[Sticks]

Come on, this is just another ex-employee who could not hack it and was useless, so when the time comes to axe her for good sound reasons she cooks up this story of this guy asking her out.

A load of rubbish from just another gold digger trying it on :mad:

[arista]

Originally posted by Sticks
Come on, this is just another ex-employee who could not hack it and was useless, so when the time comes to axe her for good sound reasons she cooks up this story of this guy asking her out.

A load of rubbish from just another gold digger trying it on :mad:



A Married Man
wanted to Bonk her.


She can Hack it
but not with her legs wide open.

[andyman]

Always comes down to sex! Bet she is a money mad skank that only has sex to offer!

[arista]

Originally posted by andyman
Always comes down to sex! Bet she is a money mad skank that only has sex to offer!


Many Women will not like your
Old School Attitude.


In Google Offices America
they never Bonk Jr. staff , for example.


Nadine is a Nice Lady.

[andyman]

She is playing the sex card knowing this will look bad on him... Kerching!!!

Do you really think she is doing this for true justice if she was wronged? This is about money! Money and sex like the trout she is.

Will she be happy if he got a fine and she gets no payout? Lol... Diggin the gold.

[arista]

He Crossed the Line
so he must pay up.


Rules Are Rules

Knickers do not get taken off by Fat Directors.

[andyman]

Arista... She could be lying to get money!

[arista]

Originally posted by andyman
Arista... She could be lying to get money!



Some may do.

But that Fat Dirty Director
wanted her knickers off.


He is Guilty.

[andyman]

They both maybe, had sex plenty of times.. She blackmails him, maybe she will tell the wife! She won't leave him alone.. She becomes a pain at work, does he tell his wife? Should he pay her to keep quiet? But she will still be there like a bad headache... Maybe he had to sack, maybe she felt robbed that he never left his wife? Maybe she thinks pay back time??

[arista]

Stop all your Silly Dirty 'maybes.'

[Twilight]

andyman do you not like woman because you seem to think man are at a higher rank. are you one of them man who think woman are just for cooking and cleaning

[andyman]

Originally posted by Twilight
andyman do you not like woman because you seem to think man are at a higher rank. are you one of them man who think woman are just for cooking and cleaning Cooking and ceaning? Women enjoy them things plus you missed out bringing up the kids, ironing, shopping for the family, baking lil cakes but that comes under cooking anyway.
Look there are three rules for women..
1. Be a good mother and kind loving wife.
2. Be a diry hoe in the bedroom.
3. Agree with her man, he is always right..:bigsmile:

[Harry!]

Oh dear, Bets the credit crunch I sopose.

[arista]

Originally posted by andyman
Originally posted by Twilight
andyman do you not like woman because you seem to think man are at a higher rank. are you one of them man who think woman are just for cooking and cleaning Cooking and ceaning? Women enjoy them things plus you missed out bringing up the kids, ironing, shopping for the family, baking lil cakes but that comes under cooking anyway.
Look there are three rules for women..
1. Be a good mother and kind loving wife.
2. Be a diry hoe in the bedroom.
3. Agree with her man, he is always right..:bigsmile:



Andyman
This Dirty Director is Married
but still wanted this workers Knickers Off.

[Sticks]

Originally posted by arista
Andyman
This Dirty Director is Married
but still wanted this workers Knickers Off.

That's just the word of a suspected gold digger who was not up to the job

There is no proof he made any advances and I am more inclined to believe him

[Twilight]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by arista
Andyman
This Dirty Director is Married
but still wanted this workers Knickers Off.
I am more inclined to believe him why??

[MarkWaldorf]

LOL what a pig.

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by arista
Andyman
This Dirty Director is Married
but still wanted this workers Knickers Off.

That's just the word of a suspected gold digger who was not up to the job

There is no proof he made any advances and I am more inclined to believe him

Why so? Please explain your reasons. It's strange that the innocent are being painted as villains here.

[arista]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by arista
Andyman
This Dirty Director is Married
but still wanted this workers Knickers Off.

That's just the word of a suspected gold digger who was not up to the job

There is no proof he made any advances and I am more inclined to believe him


That Sums you up.

[arista]

Originally posted by MarkSpears
LOL what a pig.


Yes he is a Fat Pig
wanting her knickers off.

Typical of some Executives.

[Sticks]

Originally posted by Muse
Why so? Please explain your reasons. It's strange that the innocent are being painted as villains here.

He is a deeply religious man who also lost his son last year, who was friends with royalty, to even contemplate such a decent man would do such a thing is beyond the pale :mad:

This woman got sacked because she could not hack the job and did not fit in and so she comes up with this outlandish tale hoping the tribunal will believe her

[arista]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by Muse
Why so? Please explain your reasons. It's strange that the innocent are being painted as villains here.

He is a deeply religious man who also lost his son last year, who was friends with royalty, to even contemplate such a decent man would do such a thing is beyond the pale :mad:

This woman got sacked because she could not hack the job and did not fit in and so she comes up with this outlandish tale hoping the tribunal will believe her


Thats your Typical view.

The real story is he demanded to Bonk her.

[TheMac]

And how do you know this "real story" Arista?

[arista]

Originally posted by mr_mitb
And how do you know this "real story" Arista?


Ask the Lawyers.

[TheMac]

No lawyer has ever told a lie before, eh :wink: They won't even know the full story

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by Sticks
Originally posted by Muse
Why so? Please explain your reasons. It's strange that the innocent are being painted as villains here.

He is a deeply religious man who also lost his son last year, who was friends with royalty, to even contemplate such a decent man would do such a thing is beyond the pale :mad:

This woman got sacked because she could not hack the job and did not fit in and so she comes up with this outlandish tale hoping the tribunal will believe her

Religion means sh*t, look at priests doesn't stop some of them being dirty peadophiles doesn't it? Last time I checked Royalty was hardly clean either, Prince Harry anyone?

I feel sorry for him losing his son but that doesn't give him a free pass for sexual harrasment.

In summary he is in the wrong and I think you are quite sexist.

[arista]

Bang On Right
Muse.

Religion is not in this.

And
Sticks is Old School.

[Sticks]

We see this all the time in tribunals

someone is not good at their job so they get sacked and then they try and claim it was some form of discrimination

Ohhhh Please

We've heard it before

Move along nothing to see

[arista]

Nothing to see.

There will be.
We see a big amount of Executives
demanding Sex with Lower Workers.

You stick with your Men Only Rule
thats your problem Sticks.


"Guy Oppenheim, 55, the Swiss-born
chief executive of Notz Stucki - one of Europe's largest asset management companies - bombarded Nadine Nassar with suggestive texts and late night phone calls, a tribunal was told."


Texts are kept.

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by Sticks
We see this all the time in tribunals

someone is not good at their job so they get sacked and then they try and claim it was some form of discrimination

Ohhhh Please

We've heard it before

Move along nothing to see

No you're just a bigot. You're trying to paint this woman as a gold digging ***** because you think this man cannot do wrong since he is religious and upper class.

Never heard so much bullsh*t in my life.

[Lauren]

Sticks, are you trying to tell us that someone who is mourning and religious cannot commit such an attack? Seriously?

If so, you're either seriously in need of a reality check, or a bigot with his head buried in the ground.

How would you react if this woman was a close member of your family, or someone in your church group?

[arista]

Does that matter Lauren
to Sticks
it is a Female.

[andyman]

And of course why would a woman lie? Oh women never lie do they???

Like i said before, would she be happy if he got a huge fine and no payout to her????

[Lauren]

Originally posted by andyman
And of course why would a woman lie? Oh women never lie do they???

Like i said before, would she be happy if he got a huge fine and no payout to her????

If what she has said is true, then I imagine she'd be happy without the payout to her, yes.

[Sticks]

Has she provided actual proof of misconduct

If this had been going on for some time, why wait until just before she is fired to put in a grievance?

Is it hard to entertain the possibility that she might be trying it on?

You have already convicted him when I thought we were "innocent until proven guilty" It is up to her to prove this happened.

The situation is that sometimes at tribunal when someone has been dismissed they may come up with some tale of discrimination, and note it it does not have to be based on gender as it is in this case. Why? Because they hope the lawyers will cave in to avoid bad publicity.

I once heard of a serial litigant who applied for jobs and when he did not get an interview played the race card, and some companies frightened of bad publicity just folded and coughed up

Kerching, nice work if you can get it

I have a relative who used to sit on tribunals, so we got to hear about some cases. It tends to make you a bit case hardened when you hear these bleatings from people who were usually dismissed fairly.

It is not a question of gender or class.

[andyman]

Originally posted by Lauren
Originally posted by andyman
And of course why would a woman lie? Oh women never lie do they???

Like i said before, would she be happy if he got a huge fine and no payout to her????

If what she has said is true, then I imagine she'd be happy without the payout to her, yes. hahahaha... C'mon, the whole case is money driven! Maybe he ended their fling, she wants pay back...?

[arista]

Andyman
read the paper again.

There is None of you bleedin'
"Maybes".


You can hold on.
This case is still going on.


"She made a formal complaint about Mr Oppenheim's alleged sexual harassment last March."


And she is playing by the book.

That Fat Pig
just wanted her knickers off.

[Lauren]

Originally posted by andyman
Originally posted by Lauren
Originally posted by andyman
And of course why would a woman lie? Oh women never lie do they???

Like i said before, would she be happy if he got a huge fine and no payout to her????

If what she has said is true, then I imagine she'd be happy without the payout to her, yes. hahahaha... C'mon, the whole case is money driven! Maybe he ended their fling, she wants pay back...?

And if not? Why are you completely disregarding the fact it could be a case of sexual harassment? It happens, and we shouldn't disregard all cases of it just cos there are times when women lie.

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by Sticks
Has she provided actual proof of misconduct

If this had been going on for some time, why wait until just before she is fired to put in a grievance?

Is it hard to entertain the possibility that she might be trying it on?

You have already convicted him when I thought we were "innocent until proven guilty" It is up to her to prove this happened.

The situation is that sometimes at tribunal when someone has been dismissed they may come up with some tale of discrimination, and note it it does not have to be based on gender as it is in this case. Why? Because they hope the lawyers will cave in to avoid bad publicity.

I once heard of a serial litigant who applied for jobs and when he did not get an interview played the race card, and some companies frightened of bad publicity just folded and coughed up

Kerching, nice work if you can get it

I have a relative who used to sit on tribunals, so we got to hear about some cases. It tends to make you a bit case hardened when you hear these bleatings from people who were usually dismissed fairly.

It is not a question of gender or class.

'Has she provided actual proof of misconduct'

Like Arista mentioned previously....texts.

'If this had been going on for some time, why wait until just before she is fired to put in a grievance?'

She filed a complaint last march....

'Is it hard to entertain the possibility that she might be trying it on?'

:joker: Yes because he's such a SEXGOD isn't he?

If she has proof then that is it, she's innocent he's guilty and you're bigoted. The worst thing is that you always try to put across that you're uber PC when you're more prejudiced then anyone on the forum.

EDIT: Lauren's got it spot on, you're disregarding the case and assuming the man's innocent you're just as worse as 'us thinking the man is guilty before he is proven so' (even though the woman has proof).

[andyman]

But Lauren you are already thinking he is in the wrong! Just like the other posts in the thread..

[Lauren]

Originally posted by andyman
But Lauren you are already thinking he is in the wrong! Just like the other posts in the thread..
No, I said "if what she said is true". I'm accepting she could be lying, but Sticks (and slightly you) are refusing to accept it could be true.

[arista]

Originally posted by Lauren
Originally posted by andyman
But Lauren you are already thinking he is in the wrong! Just like the other posts in the thread..
No, I said "if what she said is true". I'm accepting she could be lying, but Sticks (and slightly you) are refusing to accept it could be true.


Andyman
are you having a Drink?


As you seem to be missing bits.