PDA

View Full Version : Is this where the house will be??

John.
03-05-2009, 11:00 PM
is this the place where the house will be this year?

has there been a change in location or is it still at Elstree??

http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t267/funkychicken999/house3.png
Matt
03-05-2009, 11:01 PM
It's still at Elstree. That report surfaced before BB9.
ILoveTRW
03-05-2009, 11:02 PM
no, it was supposed to be the new BB8/9 (can't remember which) house if you believed heat magazine
John.
03-05-2009, 11:10 PM
Originally posted by ILoveMoney
no, it was supposed to be the new BB8/9 (can't remember which) house if you believed heat magazine

i thought that they had to mover the house because of the new rules at elstree. and how it annoyed local resident?

but obviously not?
Lewis.
04-05-2009, 07:27 AM
If you look at the bottom of the page, it says "september - October 2007"

So nope
Rob
04-05-2009, 08:58 AM
that an old rumour
John.
04-05-2009, 09:01 AM
Originally posted by LewisLeona
If you look at the bottom of the page, it says "september - October 2007"

So nope

i asked the question as in, is this the place that the big brother ouse is this year. not is this the big brother house?

((iprobably should have made that clearer!):laugh:
Rob
04-05-2009, 09:08 AM
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by LewisLeona
If you look at the bottom of the page, it says "september - October 2007"

So nope

i asked the question as in, is this the place that the big brother ouse is this year. not is this the big brother house?

((iprobably should have made that clearer!):laugh:

no its at elstree, considering the completely restructured the house last year they wont move for a few years at least now
Firewire
04-05-2009, 10:20 AM
It looks like an office block.
John.
04-05-2009, 10:28 AM
Originally posted by Firewire
It looks like an office block.

don't you think it looks very imposing?

and very new? i think it would have been great! what a launch seeing that thing!:laugh:
Sam!
04-05-2009, 12:24 PM
I remember posting this last year lool. [haha they are my scans aswell!]
BBDodge
04-05-2009, 01:49 PM
Anything less like a BB House would be difficult to imagine.

Heat got that one so wrong.
President
05-05-2009, 07:04 AM
No offence JD, but you know perfectly well that the house won't be there. Firstly, it's been publicly confirmed for ages that teh BB house would stay at Elstree studios until at least 2010.

Secondly, those pics were printed in 2007! So, it's very old rumours anyways.
jaybitches
05-05-2009, 07:35 AM
Originally posted by President
No offence JD, but you know perfectly well that the house won't be there. Firstly, it's been publicly confirmed for ages that teh BB house would stay at Elstree studios until at least 2010.

Secondly, those pics were printed in 2007! So, it's very old rumours anyways.

I love it... your soo blunt president lool i love it
John.
05-05-2009, 09:02 AM
Originally posted by President
No offence JD, but you know perfectly well that the house won't be there. Firstly, it's been publicly confirmed for ages that teh BB house would stay at Elstree studios until at least 2010.

Secondly, those pics were printed in 2007! So, it's very old rumours anyways.

no actually i didn't know... i was under the impression that for BB10 & BB11 the house was being relocated...

so:tongue:
BBDodge
05-05-2009, 09:35 AM
They don't have the money to re-locate.

They were forced out of their original location in Bow.
John.
05-05-2009, 09:43 AM
Originally posted by BBDodge
They don't have the money to re-locate.

They were forced out of their original location in Bow.
they weren't forced out, the contract was only for two years. and they didn't renew! which is fair enough?
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 09:45 AM
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by BBDodge
They don't have the money to re-locate.

They were forced out of their original location in Bow.
they weren't forced out, the contract was only for two years. and they didn't renew! which is fair enough?

Not true JD, they were told they had to leave as the land was to be restored to it's natural state. I remember there was a rush to find a new location.
John.
05-05-2009, 09:48 AM
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by BBDodge
They don't have the money to re-locate.

They were forced out of their original location in Bow.
they weren't forced out, the contract was only for two years. and they didn't renew! which is fair enough?

Not true JD, they were told they had to leave as the land was to be restored to it's natural state. I remember there was a rush to find a new location.

yeah yeah! after the two year contract ran out, and they didn't renew!
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 09:56 AM
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by BBDodge
They don't have the money to re-locate.

They were forced out of their original location in Bow.
they weren't forced out, the contract was only for two years. and they didn't renew! which is fair enough?

Not true JD, they were told they had to leave as the land was to be restored to it's natural state. I remember there was a rush to find a new location.

yeah yeah! after the two year contract ran out, and they didn't renew!

Nope. The contract ran out and they weren't allowed to renew.
President
05-05-2009, 10:04 AM
Lol, nice one DigitalSid.

That JD person doesn't know what he's talking about. :bigsmile:
John.
05-05-2009, 10:09 AM
they didn't renew!

that's what i said.
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 10:09 AM
Originally posted by President
Lol, nice one DigitalSid.

That JD person doesn't know what he's talking about. :bigsmile:

Thanks :bigsmile:

Makes good fan designs though.
John.
05-05-2009, 10:10 AM
Originally posted by President
That JD person


is actually here!:cloud:
John.
05-05-2009, 10:11 AM
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by President
Lol, nice one DigitalSid.

That JD person doesn't know what he's talking about. :bigsmile:

Thanks :bigsmile:

Makes good fan designs though.

thanks!:cloud:
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 10:13 AM
Originally posted by JD.
they didn't renew!

that's what i said.

What? Look the contract ran out in late 2001 / early 2002 and the council ordered that it be turned back into greenery. They had no choice to renew.

Or at least that's how I remember it.
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 10:14 AM
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by President
Lol, nice one DigitalSid.

That JD person doesn't know what he's talking about. :bigsmile:

Thanks :bigsmile:

Makes good fan designs though.

thanks!:cloud:

No problem :pat:.
John.
05-05-2009, 10:15 AM
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by JD.
they didn't renew!

that's what i said.

What? Look the contract ran out in late 2001 / early 2002 and the council ordered that it be turned back into greenery. They had no choice to renew.

Or at least that's how I remember it.

that's what i'm saying though... the council didn't renew the contract :rolleyes:

doesn't matter if they wheren't allowed to renew, the fact of the matter is they didn't~!!:conf2:
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 10:25 AM
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by JD.
they didn't renew!

that's what i said.

What? Look the contract ran out in late 2001 / early 2002 and the council ordered that it be turned back into greenery. They had no choice to renew.

Or at least that's how I remember it.

that's what i'm saying though... the council didn't renew the contract :rolleyes:

doesn't matter if they wheren't allowed to renew, the fact of the matter is they didn't~!!:conf2:

But that's basically what Elliebrew was saying and councils don't do the renewing, the show applies for it to be renewed and they just give permission or reject it so your still technically wrong.

Plus we should stop referring to it as a contract it's a planning application.
John.
05-05-2009, 10:32 AM
Originally posted by DigitalSid

But that's basically what Elliebrew was saying and councils don't do the renewing, the show applies for it to be renewed and they just give permission or reject it so your still technically wrong.

Plus we should stop referring to it as a contract it's a planning application.
god. i think your going a bit ott on the technical side!
DigitalSid
05-05-2009, 10:36 AM
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by DigitalSid

But that's basically what Elliebrew was saying and councils don't do the renewing, the show applies for it to be renewed and they just give permission or reject it so your still technically wrong.

Plus we should stop referring to it as a contract it's a planning application.
god. i think your going a bit ott on the technical side!

Technical?

There's a big difference between a contract and a planning application so it's a little more than technical.
John.
05-05-2009, 10:41 AM
Originally posted by DigitalSid
Originally posted by JD.
Originally posted by DigitalSid

But that's basically what Elliebrew was saying and councils don't do the renewing, the show applies for it to be renewed and they just give permission or reject it so your still technically wrong.

Plus we should stop referring to it as a contract it's a planning application.
god. i think your going a bit ott on the technical side!

Technical?

There's a big difference between a contract and a planning application so it's a little more than technical.

my point exactly :joker: