PDA

View Full Version : Do you think that the audition age should be lowerd to 16?

bigbrothermad123
18-05-2009, 04:59 PM
I DEFINATLY DO IT WOULD BE GREAT COZ THEN I WOULD HAVE ONLY 2 MORE YEARS TO GO AND THEN I COULD AUDTION !:hello::cheer2::colour::dance2::dance::spin2:
Noel
18-05-2009, 05:01 PM
Calm down, jive turkey.
I don't think they could due to being underage and all..there was a teen one before though!
BIG-BRO-FAN
18-05-2009, 05:03 PM
I think the age should remain at 18.


Just so you know, posting in capitals is against the rules. It's considered shouting.
Patrick
18-05-2009, 05:07 PM
Deffenatly then i could audition in 2 years!!!
bronaaaa
18-05-2009, 05:44 PM
Nope, I think I'd just encourage younger ones to frop out before finishing their GCSE's and all that.
mkdfan
18-05-2009, 05:48 PM
No way, 18 is a good age.
Twilight
18-05-2009, 05:49 PM
Originally posted by bigbrothermad123
I DEFINATLY DO IT WOULD BE GREAT COZ THEN I WOULD HAVE ONLY 2 MORE YEARS TO GO AND THEN I COULD AUDTION !:hello::cheer2::colour::dance2::dance::spin2:
annoying member number 1 is mado
annoying member number 2 is bigbrothermad123
:rolleyes:
Tom4784
18-05-2009, 05:51 PM
No way, It's just stupid. It'd create a media sh*tstorm the size of Texas.
arista
18-05-2009, 05:53 PM
Originally posted by bigbrothermad123
I DEFINATLY DO IT WOULD BE GREAT COZ THEN I WOULD HAVE ONLY 2 MORE YEARS TO GO AND THEN I COULD AUDTION !:hello::cheer2::colour::dance2::dance::spin2:



No
as a Jr.Version is done
from time to time.
Marc
18-05-2009, 05:53 PM
No.. definately not. There are numerous laws that Big Brother cannot overcome for that to happen. Silly children... have an education, your probably not even interesting enough to get accepted :tongue:
Tom
18-05-2009, 06:01 PM
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

if anything it should be put up to 21

all of the best housemates are around 30 imo, they're the ones I tend to support- the ones that have had an interesting life and are still quite young ...

18 year olds in the house annoy me
Mister-Darko
18-05-2009, 06:27 PM
If it was a few years ago, I would've said yes because it'd be sooner for me to apply.

But now that I'm over 16, NO! SCREW YOU KIDDIES! You can wait like I had to! BAHAHA!
30stone
18-05-2009, 06:30 PM
19 - 29 is the best age housemates.

16 would be horrible, especially in there with adults.
Moses1
18-05-2009, 06:51 PM
Certainly not. I think BB is far too focussed on the lower age groups. People are far more interesting when they get older. Less about the booze, clubbing, pulling shite. More about deep intellectual conversation.
Imagine loads of 14 year old loud mouths in there shouting nonsense and spelling 'definitely' wrong.
Mister-Darko
18-05-2009, 06:52 PM
Originally posted by Moses1
Imagine loads of 14 year old loud mouths in there shouting nonsense and spelling 'definitely' wrong.

:joker:
FelixO
18-05-2009, 06:53 PM
Eurgh, No!

They would run a mock and plus they couldn't handle the psychological effects and what not
30stone
18-05-2009, 06:55 PM
Lower ages are annoying and over reactive.

Older ages are annoying, boring and over reactive.


But them not being 18 would be pointless like not being able to drink etc..

All should be from 19 - 35.


I dont like old people in the house.
FelixO
18-05-2009, 06:56 PM
Exactly, wouldn't be half as entertaining
Tom
18-05-2009, 07:00 PM
Originally posted by Moses1
Certainly not. I think BB is far too focussed on the lower age groups. People are far more interesting when they get older. Less about the booze, clubbing, pulling s****. More about deep intellectual conversation.
Imagine loads of 14 year old loud mouths in there shouting nonsense and spelling 'definitely' wrong.

I don't want deep intellectual conversations, I want scenes like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt6xbuNm2WY

:laugh3:
Nicky.
18-05-2009, 07:04 PM
Definitely not!
But I think the age to be at the launch/eviction/final should be lowered!
LemonJam
18-05-2009, 07:07 PM
Originally posted by bronaaaa
Nope, I think I'd just encourage younger ones to frop out before finishing their GCSE's and all that.

This. :lovedup:
Mister-Darko
18-05-2009, 07:08 PM
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by Moses1
Certainly not. I think BB is far too focussed on the lower age groups. People are far more interesting when they get older. Less about the booze, clubbing, pulling s****. More about deep intellectual conversation.
Imagine loads of 14 year old loud mouths in there shouting nonsense and spelling 'definitely' wrong.

I don't want deep intellectual conversations, I want scenes like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt6xbuNm2WY

:laugh3:

Fight night was awesome.
Brekkie
18-05-2009, 07:16 PM
If anything it should be raised to 21.
Tom
18-05-2009, 07:25 PM
Originally posted by Nicky.
Definitely not!
But I think the age to be at the launch/eviction/final should be lowered!

Its not that good

A lot of waiting around really just to stand there and cheer/boo
cocopops
18-05-2009, 07:55 PM
no way, it must be so physiologically straining to be a housemate both in and out the house, i dont think kids would be equipped to deal with it! I think it should be raised to 21.
thisisme2008
18-05-2009, 08:31 PM
Originally posted by Bradley!
Calm down, jive turkey.
I don't think they could due to being underage and all..there was a teen one before though!

Teen one was all 18 or 19 year olds.

I don't think they could for child labour laws.

Also they'd have to be really careful with alcohol etc.

There would be loads of complaints about exploitation, etc.
MR.K!
18-05-2009, 08:32 PM
NO! that would let in a bunch of wanabee spoiled bratty people :(
Beastie
18-05-2009, 08:40 PM
yeah i think it as to remain at 18!! because of alcohol and all that!!

so for the sake of the younger generation who want to go on!

keep bb alive forever! lol
mado
18-05-2009, 09:30 PM
no 16 is to young:dance:
Nicky.
18-05-2009, 09:31 PM
Originally posted by Tom
Originally posted by Nicky.
Definitely not!
But I think the age to be at the launch/eviction/final should be lowered!

Its not that good

A lot of waiting around really just to stand there and cheer/boo

True!
But I'd like to be at the final though!
ozzycam
18-05-2009, 10:08 PM
No way leave well alone
Indierock&roll
19-05-2009, 03:48 PM
16 would be way too young.. though then i could audition but still too young
StrawberryCake
19-05-2009, 04:44 PM
No because one wrong move and their lives will be AHEMED for the rest of their lives and if there was a romance it would be....wrong. Also imagine lots of 16 year olds in a house when they start to argue.
MrGaryy
19-05-2009, 04:48 PM
Originally posted by Twilight
Originally posted by bigbrothermad123
I DEFINATLY DO IT WOULD BE GREAT COZ THEN I WOULD HAVE ONLY 2 MORE YEARS TO GO AND THEN I COULD AUDTION !:hello::cheer2::colour::dance2::dance::spin2:
annoying member number 1 is mado
annoying member number 2 is bigbrothermad123
:rolleyes:

annoying member number 3 is twilight.
get a life and stop pestering the newbies.
Benji
19-05-2009, 04:48 PM
No - I dont agree with 16+ Auditions purely because of what BB does to you, we hear all the horror stories of past housemates etc. and at that age - your options in education are very wide. You may regret it and you may be young and naive, still childlike. Im sure aswell Nudity would come into play aswell - You would have to be over 18.
bigbrothermad123
19-05-2009, 07:16 PM
I WOULD GET IN, TRUST ME !!!
Lil-Lindz
19-05-2009, 07:20 PM
Yes and no, allthough i cant select both, i think it will be interesting to see how younger people react in the house (as in 16 and 17 year olds) it may also cause a divide as they 16/17 year olds cannot drink, and so may become separate from the older people
But i also feel 16/17 is too young to be in the bb house

its hard to decide really! :shrug: