I'm not sure of Denmark derserved to place above it, but they deserved top ten. But, I thought that Belgium was rubbish really.

True. Denmark and Belgium didn't deserve to be above it in the scoreboard.

Apricot Stone definitely deserved top ten, everything about that song was amazing from the staging to the song and the vocals

Slovakia was robbed indeed but I understand that it was inaccessible for most people. It was not a mainstream song or one that non-Eurovision fans would consider "cool".

Oh, I loved "Apricot Stone"!

In 2010, two experimental risk songs were Slovenia and Slovakia and both failed to make it. Even though Slovakia deserved top ten at least like, I think one of the main reasons Armenia and Ukraine did so well was the staging. Those two and Russia possibly had the best staging and stage presence, and of course, they had great songs

I think some countries might pick up on the fact that a song sung in languages that wasn't english won, and might go bilingual or sing a song completely in a different language to english.

For example, Armenia did very well with an original song this year and Ukraine even won. But do you remember Slovenia 2010 or Georgia 2012? These were pretty original songs too but almost no one liked them.

I mean that sending original songs is a risk, you never know how it will turn out.

Yes, you're right. I think this year the general quality of the entries is going to be unpredictable. Countries will try to imitate Jamala and send original songs but I really hope they don't end up with "too weird" ones.

We do tend to see a few acts 'imitate' the previous year's winnig entry in the recent years