ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Britain's Got Talent (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=151)
-   -   Britain's Got Talent [Semi-Final 2] - Discussion thread (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=138179)

Beastie 01-06-2010 09:08 PM

Err so Simon and Piers put Connected through over Neil? for the teeny bopper votes wasn't it? FAIIIIIIIL.

bbfan1991 01-06-2010 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebeast (Post 3279921)
Err so Simon and Piers put Connected through over Neil? for the teeny bopper votes wasn't it? FAIIIIIIIL.

Connected are going to give George Sampson, Lloyd Daniels and Eoghan Quigg a run for their money apparently *shudders*:shocked:.

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 09:12 PM

Those five muppets can't even sing. It's weird mummies trying to make living replicas of the boybands they had crushes on. It's just creepy!

Beastie 01-06-2010 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbfan1991 (Post 3279935)
Connected are going to give George Sampson, Lloyd Daniels and Eoghan Quigg a run for their money apparently *shudders*:shocked:.

Nooooooooooooooooooooo! The torture!! I rather the lady gaga impersonator go through!! :hugesmile:

Jack_ 01-06-2010 09:20 PM

In fairness, Connected have far more potential than Neil does. If you can't see that you're deluded.

In saying that I liked both of them, so it was a tough choice either way.

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 09:23 PM

Arrangement, Starburst, Peridot, Chloe Higginbotham, Paul Birling, Jimmy Forde and two others tomorrow.

Beastie 01-06-2010 09:23 PM

I think The Arrangement are on tomorrow!!!!!! :)

Beastie 01-06-2010 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassiveTruck (Post 3280012)
Arrangement, Starburst, Peridot, Chloe Higginbotham, Paul Birling, Jimmy Forde and two others tomorrow.

Yes!!!!!! will be watching!!

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3279997)
In fairness, Connected have far more potential than Neil does. If you can't see that you're deluded.

In saying that I liked both of them, so it was a tough choice either way.

Potential... Potential...

to do what? I saw five boys stand up dressed by topman and hair by boots, attempt to sing but farted out a flat soul-less groan...

I want to know what this potential is? Apart from selling records to young impressionable girls... what is this potential... tell me... What?

Boothy 01-06-2010 09:26 PM

How did those snivelly ******wits get through? They're basically their mother's talentless puppets. Neil was miles better.

Jack_ 01-06-2010 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassiveTruck (Post 3280021)
Potential... Potential...

to do what? I saw five boys stand up dressed by topman and hair by boots, attempt to sing but farted out a flat soul-less groan...

I want to know what this potential is? Apart from selling records to young impressionable girls... what is this potential... tell me... What?

That's the potential. Like it or loathe it that's the potential they have. Oh, and that they can get better.

Neil's good but in fairness you need to ask yourself would he sell records? Chances are, no. See: Daniel Evans [XF5] for details.

Stacey. 01-06-2010 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boothy (Post 3280029)
How did those snivelly ******wits get through? They're basically their mother's talentless puppets. Neil was miles better.

:crazy:

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3280032)
That's the potential. Like it or loathe it that's the potential they have. Oh, and that they can get better.

Neil's good but in fairness you need to ask yourself would he sell records? Chances are, no. See: Daniel Evans [XF5] for details.

But that's not talent. That's the talent of the record company.

If a board of directors were contestants and they showcased five kids and said we're going to manufacture them as superficial boyfriends for the country then, the record company have the talent but it's nowhere near as good as the talent Neil has.

And please... don't compare him to Daniel Evans.

Jack_ 01-06-2010 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassiveTruck (Post 3280048)
But that's not talent. That's the talent of the record company.

If a board of directors were contestants and they showcased five kids and said we're going to manufacture them as superficial boyfriends for the country then, the record company have the talent but it's nowhere near as good as the talent Neil has.

And please... don't compare him to Daniel Evans.

Of course. But that's the potential, whether it is the talent of the record company or not. It is still potential.

I compare him because it's true. I'm sorry, but let's get back to reality for a second here. I very much doubt he would sell.

Like it or loathe it, that's the case.

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3280093)
Of course. But that's the potential, whether it is the talent of the record company or not. It is still potential.

I compare him because it's true. I'm sorry, but let's get back to reality for a second here. I very much doubt he would sell.

Like it or loathe it, that's the case.

You never know. If he can break through on the back of this show like many have then he can break through. Rather him than a copycat act.

Jack_ 01-06-2010 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassiveTruck (Post 3280104)
You never know. If he can break through on the back of this show like many have then he can break through. Rather him than a copycat act.

But people said that about Daniel Evans, didn't they?

Of course he has a chance, but a small chance that him and the record company will have to work ****ing hard for.

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3280115)
But people said that about Daniel Evans, didn't they?

Of course he has a chance, but a small chance that him and the record company will have to work ****ing hard for.

But from what you have said, you cannot say Connected have talent or even potential. All that is based upon the record company and whether the record company can do that on the back of nothing more than the publicity and the judges of Britain's Got Talent. All that disappears and only really works for a winner or a unique talent like Susan Boyle.

So they don't have talent and their potential is questionable. What's stopping me from getting five kids with top man clothes and hair gel and make up to perform and woo girls? Then am I not the talent.

I don't think Daniel is in the same boat as Neil because Daniel was slaughtered every week and so didn't have his true talent as potential but just as a gimmick on the show that the judges' could mock so AlexBLANDra Berk could win the show. Neil has had that impetus and he does have a unique talent because he carries it off a lot better than Daniel. While I accept it is hard to break through unless you have clear unique exuberance but all that being said, in terms of talent, Neil has pounds of it and connected have shown nothing more than Neil having more talent in a useless piece of excess skin on his bum than connected could ever imagine having over infinite life times.

Jack_ 01-06-2010 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassiveTruck (Post 3280233)
But from what you have said, you cannot say Connected have talent or even potential. All that is based upon the record company and whether the record company can do that on the back of nothing more than the publicity and the judges of Britain's Got Talent. All that disappears and only really works for a winner or a unique talent like Susan Boyle.

So they don't have talent and their potential is questionable. What's stopping me from getting five kids with top man clothes and hair gel and make up to perform and woo girls? Then am I not the talent.

I don't think Daniel is in the same boat as Neil because Daniel was slaughtered every week and so didn't have his true talent as potential but just as a gimmick on the show that the judges' could mock so AlexBLANDra Berk could win the show. Neil has had that impetus and he does have a unique talent because he carries it off a lot better than Daniel. While I accept it is hard to break through unless you have clear unique exuberance but all that being said, in terms of talent, Neil has pounds of it and connected have shown nothing more than Neil having more talent in a useless piece of excess skin on his bum than connected could ever imagine having over infinite life times.

They do have potential. The potential to sell records, regardless of whose 'talent' it is.

As for them having talent, sorry, but they can sing. Sure, they are pretty sh!t when solo, I'm not going to dispute that, but the harmonies when they come together are undoubtedly good, and if anyone disputes that, then I think they're pretty deluded. You may not like an act, but some people need to start accepting things when they are good. They're not the best, no, but they're not awful either. I think we can safely say there has been much, much worse over the years.

Regarding Daniel/Neil, that's fair enough I guess. I just still don't think he would sell, that's all.

MassiveTruck 01-06-2010 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 3280262)
They do have potential. The potential to sell records, regardless of whose 'talent' it is.

As for them having talent, sorry, but they can sing. Sure, they are pretty sh!t when solo, I'm not going to dispute that, but the harmonies when they come together are undoubtedly good, and if anyone disputes that, then I think they're pretty deluded. You may not like an act, but some people need to start accepting things when they are good. They're not the best, no, but they're not awful either. I think we can safely say there has been much, much worse over the years.

Regarding Daniel/Neil, that's fair enough I guess. I just still don't think he would sell, that's all.

I can say Westlife are good or Boyzone, well I can say they are average because sometimes you think, ok - there is something there.

These guys and this is with completely honesty, are mind numbingly rubbish for me. They don't exude anything other than five guys having a laugh.

MeMyselfAndI 01-06-2010 11:44 PM

Cant sleep :(
TINA AND CHANDI WERE AMAZING!!
Ruby Girls were amazing too
Well done Connected :D.
Neil was crap

Strictly Jake 02-06-2010 12:12 AM

I loved chandi. Neil should have got through. And the ruby girls man they were hot! At the moment I want tobias or spellbound to win. Not much talent tomorrow night

keithafc 02-06-2010 03:09 AM

I tip Tina and Chandi for glory.

CaraRawr 02-06-2010 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boothy (Post 3280029)
How did those snivelly ******wits get through? They're basically their mother's talentless puppets. Neil was miles better.

I agree.

Ruth*Star 02-06-2010 08:26 AM

Simon's selfish, That was Neils last chance at fulfilling his dream but he still choose the young boys of whom have years and years of opportunities ahead of them.

Jamesy 02-06-2010 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruth*Star (Post 3281249)
Simon's selfish, That was Neils last chance at fulfilling his dream but he still choose the young boys of whom have years and years of opportunities ahead of them.

Completely agree with you there! Connected have got years ahead of them to become famous where'as Neil hasn't got many opportunities ahead of him.

I think Connected were crap last night to be honest, in a few years there voices will drop and they will either sound great with there 'manly' voices or awful.

I'm just not getting into this year's series, there's just too many awful acts in these shows but then I suppose the producers/judges have done this since they clearly have a winner in mind. Anyway, tonight's one sounds much better than last night, looking forward to seeing what The Arrangement come up with.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.