It annoys me that Jasmine doesn't get equal criticism though.

In fact, a lot of the people criticising Danica are supporting Jasmine, some even going so far as to display a Jasmine avatar.

Agree. It is somewhat hypocritical for Jasmine fans to criticise Danica.

Danica is as much a model as Rhian.

She was in Nuts, Zoo, FHM, Maxim and Loaded long before she was in that rinsing programme.

Those aren't small publications and they are a hell of a lot more prominent than the modelling Jasmine did.

Danika is a model too...How is she different from jasmine and rhian?
She also has a website, so do lots of models...so what?

If you think that pouting and bending over in Nuts and FHM are more prominent than modelling for the fashion houses of Milan and Paris, then me telling you otherwise is going to mean nothing to you.

In any case, I have no time for Jasmine and only mentioned her former career because you held her up as an example.

She's an "underwear model". I buy a lot of underwear, some of it quite expensive... I buy glossy magazines that don't include celebrity crap and kiss-and-tells. I have never heard of her or seen her face before. "Underwear model" must be code for something.

Well we could champion the HM's we like till the cows come home, fact is it was an incredibly rude thing to say. If I were danica I would be seeking legal advice for those slanderous comments.

Rhian and Jasmine have both got wikipedia pages, Danica hasn't.

*See's if anyone can spot the flaw in this argument* :whistle:

I'd never heard of Jasmine before Big Brother.

And she wasn't a fully fledged fashion model either, she was on a reality show that offered the chance to potentially get a foot in the door of that industry.

Which she didn't win.

Rag on Nuts, Zoo and FHM all you want but the fact is they are prominent magazines featuring predominantly natural looking, curvy girls that appeal to blokes and because of this fact it winds up a lot of women.

If Jasmine wasn't so skinny you can guarantee she would have taken up the chance to appear in all of those lads mags if given the opportunity.

In fact, post Big Brother you can guarantee she is featured in at least one of them.

No, she's a glamour model.

She's a regular in lads mags, she's not one of the more prominent ones but she has been on the cover several times.

If you don't read lads mags then I don't expect you to know her.

I don't read fashion magazines or Heat so I haven't got a clue who Jasmine is.

I wouldn't dream of "raggin on" the lads mags. They serve a purpose and if you want to champion them, then good for you. I'm sure there are sufficient men who base their view of women completely on whether they have big tits and can do the crab to keep those publications in the black.

Incidentally, most women have no problem with beautiful women, only when that beauty is all they have to offer.

You ARE her agent !!!

But she was described by Big Brother as an "underwear model", in fact that's how she's described herself. I thought underwear models modelled... you know... underwear. Surely she wouldn't say something that wasn't true to mask what she really does?!

Another attempted low blow and again totally misguided.

No, the reason I "champion" lads mags isn't because I expect women to have big tits and be bending over tables.

As I said on a previous post, I know two girls in the glamour modelling industry, one low level and one prominent.

Both have long term relationships and would be insulted by anyone referring to them as escorts or prostitutes, they despise the "oh you're just a wannabe WAG" stereotype, neither of them aspire to "bag a footballer".

Incidentally both of these girls do not agree with how Danica makes a living, but neither thinks she is a prostitute, just embarrassing for having a wish list which they think is tantamount to begging.

My point is totally the opposite of your claim, I don't care how a woman looks nor do I "base my opinion on them whether they have big tits or can do the crab", and neither do I assume that because a girl is a glamour model she also has loose morals, is a wannabe WAG or an air head.

I thought glamour models in FHM and nuts wore underwear?...That would make her an underwear model right?...

What's the difference?

Glamour, underwear, generally glamour models pose in their underwear.

She's been in countless lads mags.

And why all the veiled barbs about what she "really does" as though glamour models have some sort of predisposition towards being a slag or veering over into escorting and other shady activities in order to make money?

She is a babe station babe , she stands flashes her boobs and entices men to call her to talk about sex.

And?

Still not prostitution.

And as far as I'm aware she isn't on those channels anymore, presumably since she figured out she could make more money by doing less, instead of stripping for horny lads at 4am she figured she could make a whole lot more simply talking to older rich blokes over Skype.

Nuts magazine girls flash their boobs in the magazine and in the accompanying videos on the website.

Presumably when lads watch the videos they are thinking about sex and not climate change.

So a woman getting a man to think about sex is prostitution now as well?

Where does it end?

I don't really see the point in criticising her for not being famous enough for you, CBB is only trashy entertainment telly and has always had a pretty wide definition of "celebrity", does it really matter that much? :shrug:

Exactly, if it was ten ex-Eastenders in the house with the exact same level of fame can you imagine how boring it would be?

It'd be three straight weeks of ego massages.

er, yes sort of...but this is pot calling the kettle black. And all jasmine has done is give the 'sympathy vote' straight to dani-CAN :devil:

Quite true, not only did she not win, but she was clearly on it just for fame, not to actually become a model. I watched that series and she was the first person I remember seeing on a UK model who was clearly their just to make a name for herself, indeed just check her afore mentioned wiki page to see some choice facts about this woman of high morals... (what a joke)

Lovely girl not a fame ***** at all

Yes what a glittering model career and fine example of a human being to be judging other peoples career choices...

The woman is vile...

SO what does that make the millions of girls who happily sleep with guys they have no interest in a relationship with who shower them gifts?? Are they all *****S as well??

Also the online stuff she does involves no sexual content at all, weird I know but true I watched the show she was on about it. She has done late night adult chat TV but even that is a long way from real porn, and even real porn is VERY different to prostitution.

Lets please be factual and honest, if you dont like her fine but if you judge her with that harsh criteria you are pretty much calling 50% of young women *****s including Jasmine who Im sure has done much worse.

The double standards mooted by some FMs on this thread are laughably hypocritical:bored: It's sometimes hard to believe this is the 21st century, some on here are stuck in a 1950s time warp.

I couldn't give a chuff if he is.

He's atleast providing some facts amongst all the ridiculous prostitute accusations.