for the most part the forum works but members will also question mods descisions because mods are also members so there could be a conflict of interest, after all people in positions of trust abuse their positions. I'm not saying this is happening, but a persons personality comes across in the posts they make.
If you choose to post on a the forum you agree to accept the rules and that mods are members.

Thank you and i wish you all the luck going forward to the future

:)

I'm talking about how you're describing Kirk's posts towards you. I've never seen this so I'm not about to believe it because you say so. :shrug:

Sure, unless you are willing to sort it out with him yourself because I am assuming that you have reported him based off what you are saying.

Can we not keep discussing other members please.

I don't have a problem with my posts being removed. I do have a problem with the fact that the appeals system was taken away from us because it was abused. I know how time consuming it must be to battle with an aggrieved FM but if you're going to censor you have to allow an appeal for mitigating circumstances. I'd like to see a reintroduction of appeals, something that can't be abused and take up a whole load of time... say, a 100 word maximum appeal followed by a final decision from mods/admin with no other correspondence being entered into.

Probably not the right place for this suggestion but I got on a roll...

I would like the same...at least the concept of appeal... in a format the mods can manage

I think its been brought up a few times and weve said each time there wont be another appeals section or the like, it just did not work and members can pm any mod to appeal something they aren't happy with.

a lot of the time when you pm a mod about an infraction all you get is "i didn't give that one" so like they can't do anything about it :unsure:

not a mod - passing the buck - expose bombshell now?

:omgno:

Its like Watergate never happened


:ninja2:

And further more .. how likely if they were the ones to give it, are they to consider your argument. Especially if your post was deleted or you got an infraction during a debate they were involved in... ie) serious debates and let's say Dezzy.

I have overturned bans I have given, along with infractions too :shrug:

I can confirm this.

Queen :love:

end bans

and never ban again




where is alex?

I appealed my ban to by pm to other mods and i didnt even get a response

Because mods know best when it comes to infractions

You should know this by now smh

I got a 7 day ban earlier in the year and by the time I had walked the dog it had been revoked (true)


so I would get a dog

I already have one

Yes... I suppose I should :idc:

I suppose that someone else reported it, but it certainly was not me. I'm used to Scott. :hee:

queen of getting used to me

Yeah same and I've also overturned bans and reversed infractions that others have given out when i feel it was unjustified after discussing it in admin forum.

I'm adding this here for the last time also stop using this and other suggestions threads to discuss your own infractions and bans.

And more importantly this targeting of certain mods stops now, some of you are doing the exact same thing you are accusing the mod of and even worse doing it with a pack mentality. Any problems you have should be taken to another mod or admin of your choice through pm or the contact us option.

We have this section for suggestions so we can discuss them in a civilised manner we also welcome constructive critisism about the forum but we will not tolerate blatant insults aimed at us.

Joz check your inbox there's a love...

I'm at work atm I'll answer any pms I have when I'm home

How did you appeal it? I find it hard to believe more than one mod ignored a polite message about an unfair infraction/ban. However I can see why it would be ignored if it was full of 'omgs I am right, why wasn't X banned, *insert insult here*, biast, leaving the forum, rargh'