![]() |
Quote:
Of course there may well be. But I really don't think so. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one has said you can't comment, you are being daft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So I was left having to assume that the opinion being a valid one (if stated by another female) was in some way linked to whether or not you agree with it? |
I just cannot imagine women telling blokes they were bigoted for discussing an issue that will affect them in a negative way. And thats basically what you are saying here, that women are pretending this will be a problem in order to hide their transphobia.
Its not transphobia. Its doing what we have been taught to do. Minimizing the risk to ourselves from male people. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or in other words; I can indeed comment, but if my comments are not in agreement with female commentators, my comments are not relevant. Is that how this works? Because again, it sure doesn't seem to be the case when Brillo comments on race issues :think:. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The fact she has offered to step down demonstrates how fair she tries to be - but she had better not leave! :fist: |
Quote:
|
The thing for me is, and the reason why I now make a conscious decision to not partake in these debates - is because they're conducted in a really hostile and exclusionary environment. I personally think it's less about your posts Vicky, and more those who agree with you. We went through a stage years ago where people who dared to have some left-field opinions were being belittled and patronised, and I stopped enjoying and contributing to these kind of threads. Then things got better for a time, and we were able to have a more civilised and productive discourse. But now if anything it's WORSE than it was years ago.
Look, I totally, TOTALLY understand why some women feel the way they do about these issues. And I also totally acknowledge and recognise my privilege as a man (and have explicitly done so before when I've decided to partake, or in similar threads - like the feminism one). This is a really emotive, contemporary issue for people on both sides of the argument - it strikes at the core of people's very being and their legitimacy - and that's why I wasn't surprised when the discussion a few days ago ended up heading in a very sour and reactionary direction. The problem is though, is that if all people are interested in is either a) opinions that they agree with, and/or b) opinions from females...this isn't a debate at all. And if it's not a debate, what is the point of these discussions existing? Because all they read like these days is a bunch of people clapping and back-patting each other, and trying to exclude anyone else they think isn't fit to comment. It's like...you may as well just set up a private group so you can all agree with each other to your heart's content. This is my favourite topic in the world, I spent a year of my life writing and researching about it. I LOVE talking about this, and have done so with female friends. But that's partly why I don't feel comfortable contributing anymore, because I too have a (completely different, granted) personal stake in it. And when you're too emotionally involved, it is very easy to feel personally slighted by the hostile environment these discussions are now conducted in. I just wish we could have these debates in a more fleshed out, academic, civilised manner...with less of the sniping, the baiting, the sarcasm, the exclusion, the inflammatory language, and the like. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And actually I have disagreed with Brillo before on a few things and said so. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People have their own personal style of posting. Some posters, like ammi and jack for example, will always make an attempt to say they have looked at both sides, will always put points across in a softer kind of way. Others such as myself and brillo are more blunt and to the point. My language is my language tbh, and my posting style is my posting style. I am still not really getting how using boy and man about a boy or a man is transphobic language :shrug: |
Quote:
So can we have an example of one of these posts? quote them... If it's not myself or Vicky that you have taken exception to that narrows it down a little. I don't know how souls relate to the physical body but in all fairness I haven't seen any support for that theory either, that was as far as I see a very personal view. As you've shown in relation to the proposed law changes you haven't the scope of information to have an opinion, therefore I fail to see how that elevates you to a position to criticise anyone that has and does take this proposal very seriously. I would go as far as to say it says something about your own sense of self importance that you feel you can challenge the views of those concerned while you yourself plead ignorance. |
Quote:
No it's worse than that, you are making presumptions on what others are thinking. |
:shrug: if people can't see the issue with this thread, they aren't going to, I guess. TIBB serious debates is an off limits zone for actual debates surrounding trans issues or feminism. Duly noted.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.